We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

Tsuga canadensis in Ohio: Synecological and phytogeographical relationships

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Tsuga canadensis is the dominant in four topo-edaphic associations and one edaphic association in Ohio. WhileTsuga may occur withPinus strobus and a variety of deciduous trees (e.g.,Fagus grandifolia, Acer saccharum) in these communities, only hemlock is persistently reproducing. As compared with the contiguous mesophytic deciduous forest, these associations have a depauperate understory, a possible consequence of the shallow and generally coarse soils and low light intensity in these habitat types. The narrow gorge microhabitat of theT. canadensis-Dryopteris intermedia habitat type and the northerly exposure of theT. canadensis-D. marginales habitat type with lower light intensity and lower evapotranspiration allow the establishment and maintenance of hemlock to the exclusion of most deciduous tree species. In addition, the gorges provide some fire protection, and due to their general inaccessibility, protection from logging. These Ohio hemlock associations bear little floristic similarity to the more extensive climatic climax hemlock communities in southern Ontario, possibly reflecting elimination of most boreal associates in Ohio with climatic change since the end of the Pleistocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, H. L. 1951. A remnant of old white pine-hemlock forest in New Hampshire. Ecology 32: 750–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, Gily E. 1967. The woody vegetation of the mature forest of the Mianus River Gorge Preserve. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 94: 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E.W. 1965. Species pattern in a Lebanese Poterietum. Vegetatio 13: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, R. & S. F. Anliot. 1965. The structure and floristic composition of a virgin hemlock forest in West Virginia. Castanea 30: 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Robert Alan. 1974. A synecological study of Ohio Tsuga canadensis. M. Sc. Thesis, Kent State Univ. 98 pp.

  • Bormann, F. H. & R. B. Platt. 1958. A disjunct stand of hemlock in the Georgia Piedmont. Ecology 39: 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos, G. J. 1927. The hydrometer as a new method of the mechanical analysis of soils. Soil. Sci. 23: 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, E. L. 1967. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner, N. Y. 569 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, A. C. & S. H. Spurr. 1942. The virgin upland forest of central New England. Harv. For. Bull. 21: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, H. 1973. Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest. Contrib. Herb. Univ. Mich. 10, 404 pp.

  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison. 657 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, H. T. 1930. Vegetation of the Porcupine Mountains, northern Michigan. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts & Letters 13: 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. 1959. A canopy coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci. 33: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant communities. Harper & Row, N.Y. 300 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. American Book Co. 8th ed. N.Y. 1632 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowells, H. A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. U.S. For. Serv., Handbook 271, Washington, 762 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesner, R. C. & J. E. Potzger. 1932. Studies in forest ecology II. the ecological significance of Tsuga canadensis in Indiana. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud. 2(12): 144–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthwait, R. P., A. Dreimanis, J. Forsyth, P. F. Karrow, & G. W. White. 1965. Pleistocene deposits of the Erie Lobe. In: ‘The Quaternary of the United States’, eds. H. E. Wright, Jr. & D. G. Frey, p. 85–97. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. B. 1969. The natural vegetation of Ohio in pioneer days. Ohio Biol. Surv. Bull. 3(2), 113 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. C. 1974. The vegetation of the ravines of the Southern Finger Lakes, New York region. Amer. Midl. Nat. 91: 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A. V., D. V. Schmelz, & S. A. Nichols. 1969. Natural areas in Indiana and their preservation. Report Ind. Nat. Areas Surv. Dept. of Biol. Sci. Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Ind.

  • Lutz, H. J. 1930. The vegetation of Heart's Content, a virgin forest in northwestern Pennsylvania. Ecology 9: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maissurow, D. K. 1941. The role of fire in the perpetuation of virgin forests of nothern Wisconsin. J. For. 39: 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. D. 1959. An analysis of forest succession in Algonquin Park, Ontario. Ecol. Mono. 29: 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, C. 1901. Plant life of Alabama. U.S. Dept. Agric. Cont. Natl. Herb. VI. 921 pp.

  • Ogden J. G. III. 1966. Forest history of Ohio. I. Radiocarbon dates and pollen stratigraphy of Silver Lake, Logan County, Ohio. Ohio. J. Sci. 66: 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, L. F. & M. F. Buell. 1968. Forest vegetation of the New Jersey Highlands. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 95: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., F. W. Stearns, & Nienstaedt. 1959. Eastern hemlock seeds and seedlings. Conn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 620.

  • Oosting, H. J. & W. D. Billings. 1939. Edapho-vegetational relations in Ravenel's Woods, a virgin hemlock forest near Highlands, N. C. Am. Mid. Nat. 22: 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting, H. J. & P. F. Bourdeau. 1955. Virgin hemlock forest segregates in the Joyce Kilmer Memorial forest of western North Carolina. Bot. Gaz. 116: 340–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royse, C.F. 1970. An introduction to sediment analysis. Tempe 180 pp.

  • Segars, C. B., L. C. Crawford, & A. M. Harvill. 1951. The occurrence and distribution of hemlock in Alabama. Ecology 32: 149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterns, F. 1951. The composition of the sugar maple-hemlock-yellow birch association in northern Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, E. T. 1961. The fern guide. Doubleday, N.Y. 318 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D. R. 1972. Approaches to disjunct populations: the contribution of palynology. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 59(2): 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. B. 1936. The composition and dynamics of a beech-maple climax community. Ecol. Monogr. 6: 318–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. N., R. T. Wareham, & H. T. Scofield. 1949. Microclimates and macroclimates of Neotoma, a small valley in central Ohio. Ohio Biol. Surv. Bull. 8(1): 1–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. E., Jr. 1971. Late Quaternary vegetational history of North America. In: ‘The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages’, ed. K. K. Turekian, p. 425–464. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nomenclature follows Fernald (1950) for spermatophytes, Wherry (1961) for pteridophytes, and Crum (1973) for bryophytes.

We thank T. Cooperrider, J. A. Herrick, S. Mazzer, R. Stuckey, and D. Waller for assistance in various stages of the study, and R. Daubenmire and L. Bliss for critical review of the manuscript. R. H. Whittaker has provided constructive editorial comments. Field work was supported by the Society of Sigma Xi and the research program of Kent State University.

About this article

Cite this article

Black, R.A., Mack, R.N. Tsuga canadensis in Ohio: Synecological and phytogeographical relationships. Plant Ecol 32, 11–19 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02094660

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02094660

Keywords

Navigation