B I OD I V E R S I TA S
Volume 21, Number 12, December 2020
Pages: 5595-5604
ISSN: 1412-033X
E-ISSN: 2085-4722
DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d211204
Comparison of Agathis philippinensis resin tapping and collection
practices in three selected sites in the Philippines
VIVIAN C. DARACAN, ROSALIE C. MENDOZA, ALFIE M. TORRES, AILEEN A. JARA,
RONNIEL D. MANALO, CHELLE HENNESSY R. BATALLONES, RAMON A. RAZAL
Department of Forest Products and Paper Science, Wood Science Building, D.M. Lantican Street, College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University
of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna 4031, Philippines. Tel./fax.: +63-49-536 3432, email: vcdaracan@up.edu.ph
Manuscript received: 1 August 2020. Revision accepted: 5 November 2020.
Abstract. Daracan VC, Mendoza RC, Torres AM, Jara AA, Manalo RD, Batallones CHR, Razal RA. 2020. Comparison of Agathis
philippinensis resin tapping and collection practices in three selected sites in the Philippines. Biodiversitas 21: 5595-5604. This study
documented and compared almaciga (Agathis philippinensis Warb.) resin tapping and collection practices in three sites namely Mt.
Hamiguitan, Governor Generoso, Davao Oriental; Mt. Mantalingahan, Brooke’s Point, southern Palawan; and Puerto Princesa
Subterranean River National Park, Marufinas, central Palawan. Resin tappers, mostly male belonging to a local organization, were
interviewed, and tapping sites were visited. Tapping and collecting A. philippinensis resin is one of the supplemental income sources of
the respondents from the three sites. Market influences, and how tappers learned the trade could partly explain the similarities and
differences in tapping practices. Discrepancies in selecting trees to be tapped, tools used, type of incisions made on the ba rk, and how
resin was harvested were noted. Differences in resin appearance across sites were observed, and the existence of uncollected and wasted
resins clinging to trees or sprawling at its base was found in all sites. Removing dirt from the portion of the stem to be tapped, covering
the bark incision with plastic for protection, and contriving handmade resin baskets from plant parts available in the site were some
practices found to be worth replicating. On the other hand, there were damaged or dying trees due to the intensity of tapping, the lack of
tapping skills, and limited attention given to the health of trees. There is a need for strengthening tappers’ organizations for increased
bargaining power to secure better resin price and policy support to prioritize indigenous peoples in tapping into their ancestral domain.
Tappers can benefit from cross-visits and other learning opportunities for sharing lessons and experiences to improve tapping practices
for better resin quality and higher prices.
Keywords: Agathis philippinensis, almaciga, indigenous knowledge, local tappers, resin yield, supply chain
INTRODUCTION
Almaciga (Agathis philippinensis Warb.) is an
indigenous Philippine softwood species belonging to the
family Araucariaceae. Its height reaches 60 m and diameter
at breast height can reach up to 300 cm. It thrives in
mountainous forests throughout the Philippines particularly
in the provinces of Cagayan, Rizal, Isabela, Benguet, Abra,
Zambales, Nueva Ecija, Bataan, Quezon, Polilio, Aurora,
Mindoro, Camarines, Albay, Sorsogon, Calayaan Island,
Sibuyan, Negros, Samar, Palawan, Misamis, Davao, and
Zamboanga (ERDB-DENR 2013). A. philippinensis is the
main source of resin commercially known as “Manila
Copal,” considered as the country’s most important
chemical non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Manila
copal comes in the form of ground or fossil resin, or as
surface or tapped resin. Fossil resin is the amber-colored
exudation from the roots, which is obtained by digging into
the ground where the plant once grew, whereas surface
resin is extracted by tapping living A. philippinensis trees.
The resin is mainly used as a component of varnishes
(Frezza et al. 2020). In addition, resins, in general, are used
in torches, embalming chemicals, waterproofing and
caulking ships, incense, paints, and medicines, a major
portion of the resins are also used as food additives, paint,
lacquer, paper, cosmetics, food, pharmaceutical and
chemical industries (Sharma et al. 2018). In southern
Palawan, the resin of A. philippinensis is also used as an
adhesive for making native baskets (Guerrero C 2020, pers.
com).
At the core of the supply chain for A. philippinensis
resin are the tappers who are mostly indigenous peoples
(IPs) or members of indigenous cultural communities
(ICCs). Tapping A. philippinensis trees for resin has
become one of the major livelihoods of many indigenous
groups in the country, especially in Palawan, Davao
Oriental, and northeastern Luzon. A. philippinensis trees
remain relatively abundant in the identified study sites,
namely the municipality of Governor Generoso, Davao
Oriental in Mindanao, in Mt. Mantalingahan in Brooke's
Point, southern Palawan, and the hinterlands of Puerto
Princesa City, in the central part of Palawan. In Gov.
Generoso, there are a little over 100,000 standing A.
philippinensis trees in about a hundred hectares of stand
(Mordeno 2019). Since 2007, the local government unit of
Gov. Generoso has been supporting tappers belonging to
the Mandaya and Manobo Lumad tribes and some Bisaya
tappers through the “Biodiversity Partnership Project.” The
Gov. Generoso tappers are organized into an association
called Lumad Almaciga Tappers Association of Governor
Generoso (LATAGG).
5596
B I OD I V E R S I TA S 21 (12): 5595-5604, December 2020
Meanwhile, indigenous communities in Palawan who
are engaged in tapping include the Pala’wan and
Tagbanua. The Pala’wan is one of the oldest tribes in the
Philippines (Perez 2014). In Brooke’s Point, the Pala’wan
tappers, who are also members of an existing communityowned cooperative known as Samahan ng mga Pala’wano
sa Amas Brooke’s Point (SBABP), have been tapping A.
philippinensis trees for years. Since the 1990s, SBABP has
been managing tapping operations, from the inventory of
the resin-producing trees up to trading of the resin. In
Marufinas, Puerto Princesa City, the community organizers
and the male members of the Samahang Pagkakaisa ng
mga Katutubong Tagbanua ng Marufinas (SPKTM) are
engaged in tapping A. philippinensis trees.
This paper describes and compares the resin tapping
and collection practices in the three resin tapping
communities. Although the market for A. philippinensis
resin exists and there had been various efforts towards
industry development, information on the production chain
is still limited. There is so much to be learned by reaching
out to the communities as tapping practices are mostly
traditional and location specific. An understanding of the
local practices is vital to enable sustainable resource
management, biodiversity protection, and the development
of a more efficient value chain. Possible interventions and
recommendations are presented to enhance local practices
for more efficient extraction and to contribute to the further
development of the resin industry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the key informant interviews (KIIs) and the focus
group discussions (FGDs), a semi-structured interview
schedule was prepared. The interview questions were
designed to elicit information on the profile of the tappers,
their tapping and collection practices, which include
activities done before, during, and after tapping, how they
learned to do tapping, the various tools they use, the
frequency of tapping and collection, as well as problems
and challenges encountered during tapping, collection and
marketing the resins.
As mentioned, the target communities are the tappers in
(a) Gov. Generoso, Davao Oriental, (b) Brooke’s Point,
Palawan, and (c) Marufinas, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan.
Permits were obtained from various local authorities to be
able to conduct the interviews and to document the resin
tapping and collection practices. In Gov. Generoso, letters
were sent to the Office of the Municipal Mayor to be able
to visit and conduct the data gathering work. The courtesy
call, site reconnaissance, and interview with tappers and
representatives of the local government of Gov. Generoso
were conducted on April 4-6, 2019. The respondents who
were interviewed in Gov. Generoso were residents of six
barangays namely Oregon, Sergio Osmena, Surop,
Tandang Sora, Tiblawan, and Upper Tibanban, while the
former Mayor (now Vice Mayor) and the Municipal
Tourism Officer served as respondents for the focus group
discussion. The project team was assisted by the local
government in identifying and bringing to the town center
the tappers who served as interview respondents.
In conducting the study in Palawan, a gratuitous permit
had to be obtained based on the requirements of the
Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD),
which entailed submission of a letter of intent, payment of
application fee, submission of a copy of the research
proposal and a Memorandum of Understanding that the
results will be shared with PCSD upon project completion.
Separate presentations to the respective Protected Area
Management Boards (PAMBs) that have jurisdiction over
the study sites were also done to secure the PAMB
clearance. The community also had to be consulted to
provide the Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) stating
their willingness to allow the research team to conduct the
study in their sites. In Brooke’s Point, the team was
assisted by the Nagkakaisang mga Tribu ng Palawan
(NATRIPAL), a non-government organization composed
of different tribal organizations in Palawan, in bringing the
tappers to a community house in Barangay Amas in the
lowland for the KIIs and FGDs. The tappers reside in the
upland areas of Barangay Amas and Saraza in Mt.
Mantalingahan. For Barangay Marufinas in Puerto Princesa
City, the project team was assisted by the Office of the
Protected Area Superintendent of the Puerto Princesa
Underground River in bringing the tappers to the Puerto
Princesa City Office for the interviews. Travel to Puerto
Princesa City and Brooke's Point for the conduct of
respective focus group discussions were held from April 29
to May 2, 2019.
Actual field observations were later done to validate
information collected from the interviews and FGDs,
observe tapping, and assess the status of the A.
philippinensis trees that were tapped in the different sites.
Gov. Generoso was revisited on June 24-28, 2019 when
actual resin tapping activities in barangays Tandang Sora,
Tiblawan, and Upper Tibanban in Mt. Hamiguitan were
observed. For Palawan, field observations were conducted
on September 8-15, 2019 in resin tapping sites in Mt.
Mantalingahan in Brooke’s Point. The field visit to Puerto
Princesa Subterranean River National Park in Barangay
Marufinas was done on November 9-15, 2019. The field
visits to the different sites involved various forms of
transport and required significant trekking over long
distances. Going to Marufinas also entailed traversing a
portion of the West Philippine Sea by boat, which is done
at a time of the year when the seawater is relatively calm.
Altogether, several relevant actors involved in the A.
philippinensis resin tapping and collection practices were
interviewed. Photo documentation of the tapping practices,
tools used, and of the tapped trees was done. Team
meetings were conducted to compare the tapping and
collection practices from the different sites and evaluate the
information gathered. This led to the identification of gaps
and problems and the formulation of interventions and
recommendations for the improvement of existing
practices.
DARACAN et al. – Almaciga resin tapping and collection practices
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Profile of the respondents
A total of 31 respondents from Gov. Generoso, 24 from
Brooke's Point, and 20 from Puerto Princesa City were
interviewed. Their profile is shown in Table 1. In the
municipality of Gov. Generoso, the interviewed tappers
belong to the Lumad Almaciga Tappers Association of
Gov. Generoso or LATAGG. The ages of the tappers are
from 15-70 years old. Because A. philippinensis trees were
found to be abundant in the municipality, the local
government unit of Gov. Generoso introduced the tapping
of the trees to help in the livelihood of the upland
communities who depend mostly on planting crops,
livestock, and fishing. They sought help from the Forest
Products Research and Development Institute-Department
of Science and Technology (FPRDI-DOST) to train the
community members on the proper tapping of the A.
philippinensis trees. Resin collection is done from A.
philippinensis trees growing within their barangay as
assigned to them by a kapatas, the foreman selected by the
community tasked to hire tappers and or supervise an A.
philippinensis stand. For each tapper, the number of trees
that could be tapped ranges from 15 to more than 700 trees.
There is strong local government support for sustaining
tapping as a livelihood, evident in the establishment of a
nursery designed to nurture A. philippinensis seedlings for
transplanting in the forest.
In Brooke’s Point, the Pala’wan tappers are organized
into the Samahan ng mga Pala’wano sa Amas Brooke’s
Point (SBABP). The tappers, mostly male, are between 18
to 60 years old, the eldest of whom has been tapping A.
philippinensis trees for most of his life. The number of
trees that each tapper can claim ranges from four to more
than 100 trees. Young tappers acquired their knowledge
and skills in tapping the resin producing trees from their
5597
ancestors. For most of them, farming, craft-making, and
resin tapping remain to be their source of income.
The ages of the tappers from Marufinas in Puerto
Princesa City ranged from 19-45 years old. These tappers
learned tapping from their ancestors, with no formal
training. Their primary livelihood consists of farming and
fishing. Tappers, who belong to the Tagbanua tribe, are
members of Samahang Pagkakaisa ng mga Katutubong
Tagbanua ng Marufinas (SPKTM). The organization also
facilitates the trade of goods and services within the
barangay. In both sites in Palawan, the parents pass on a
certain number of trees to their children or nearest kin.
Each can lay claim to tap from five to more than 20 trees.
Non-tribal individuals from nearby villages may be
given the right to cultivate and tap A. philippinensis trees.
In Gov. Generoso, the decision rests on the resident tappers
per barangay. In Upper Tibanban, resident tappers do not
allow tappers from outside the barangay to tap trees within
their area. In Palawan, non-tribal individuals who marry
members of indigenous communities may be allowed to tap
after submitting papers for the barangay council’s
permission, albeit it is a practice that is forbidden according
to indigenous law (Olave 2020, pers. com).
According to Sopsop and Buot (2011), collection of
rattan poles and A. philippinensis resins, the two most
common commercial non-timber forest products, remains
intense and considered as the main source of income
among the IPs in Palawan. Some Palawan resin tappers are
also rattan gatherers. They utilize it in handicraft making
such as baskets and mats. Some gather rattan for
improvising containers for collecting and transporting the
resin.
The observed practices from the pre-tapping up to the
post-tapping of A. philippinensis in the three sites are
discussed in the succeeding sections and summarized in
Table 3.
Table 1. Profile of respondents from the three sites in Davao Oriental and Palawan, Philippines
Study sites
Demographic profile
Age
Gender involved in the tapping
and collection activities
Residence (Sitio/Barangay)
Main source of income
How knowledge in tapping was
acquired
Number of A. philippinensis
trees being tapped
Association/Cooperative
Mt. Hamiguitan,
Governor Generoso,
Davao Oriental
Mt. Mantalingahan,
Brooke’s Point,
Palawan
15-70
Mostly males
18-60
Mostly males
Barangays Oregon, Sergio
Osmena, Surop, Tandang
Sora, Tiblawan, Upper
Tibanban
Farming and fishing
Learned through
training/seminars
Sitios Malia and Macaguaay in
Barangay Amas
Sitios Banton, Candis, Neltikan,
and Kalwe in Barangay Saraza
Farming, craft-making
Inherited/acquired from
parents/relatives (Indigenous
knowledge)
15-700+
4-100+
Lumad Almaciga Tappers
Association of Gov.
Generoso (LATAGG)
Samahan ng mga Pala’wano sa
Amas Brooke’s Point (SBABP)
Puerto Princesa
Subterranean River National
Park, Puerto Princesa City,
Palawan
19-45
Mostly males
Barangay Marufinas
Farming and fishing
Inherited/acquired from
parents/relatives (Indigenous
knowledge) or learned from
co-tapper
5-20+
Samahang Pagkakaisa ng mga
Katutubong Tagbanua ng
Marufinas (SPKTM)
B I OD I V E R S I TA S 21 (12): 5595-5604, December 2020
5598
Table 3. Summary of the resin tapping and collection practices observed in Davao Oriental and Palawan, Philippines
Tapping stages
Pre-tapping activities
Selection of the A.
philippinensis tree to be
tapped
Cleaning of the tree and
immediate surroundings
Actual tapping activities
Choice of tapping tools
Choice of cutting shape and
dimensions
Rechipping
Wrapping/sealing of tapped
portion using plastic
Post tapping activities
Collection of resin
Cleaning of resin
Sorting of resin
Storing of resin
Study sites
Governor Generoso,
Brooke’s Point,
Davao Oriental
Palawan
Factors considered/practices employed
Bark structure, tree location,
Resin color, tree dbh
crown density, tree dbh
Most tappers clean the tree,
scrape off the bark and clear
the immediate surroundings
where the resin will flow
Only the older tappers perform
this activity
Factors considered/practices employed
Bolo/machete, branchwood
Bolo/machete, branchwood
Rectangular cut
Diamond-shaped,
5 cm × 30 cm
Triangle shaped incision
10 cm × 30 cm
̴6 cm × 6 cm
No specific depth of cut
Quadrilateral method
No specific dimensions
No specific depth of cut
Creating a thin cut just above
Cutting the original wound or
the previously made cut; the
creating new cuts above the
schedule is dependent on the
previous one depending on resin
time/choice of tappers (once a
flow, usually done 15 days
week, once a month, twice a
month, once every three
months, etc.)
Some tappers wrap and seal A.
Not practiced
philippinensis resin on the tree
itself with clear plastic attached
to the tapped portion using
small wooden pegs
Tappers use bolo
Some tappers still use plastic to
contain resin
Some use plastic bags or sacks
to contain resin
Tappers clean their resins using
bolo to remove dirt and other
impurities
Local buyers perform solubility
test using lacquer thinner to
determine the resin class
Price of resin:
PhP 20/kg (USD 0.39)
Resins are stored in a
designated area
Observations on resin tapping and collection practices
Pre-tapping activities
Selection of Agathis philippinensis trees to be tapped
Tappers from the three sites have different
considerations in selecting the tree to be tapped. Tappers
from Gov. Generoso classify their A. philippinensis trees as
almaciga babae and almaciga lalaki, meaning female and
male trees, respectively. According to the tappers,
almaciga babae and almaciga lalaki differ in the color of
the inner bark, where almaciga babae has white inner bark
Puerto Princesa City,
Palawan
Bark structure, tree dbh
Not practiced
Bolo/machete, branchwood
Rectangular cut with no
specific dimensions
No specific depth of cut
Creating a continuous cut
above the previous cut
following its shape/resin
flow, usually done once a
month
Not practiced
Tappers use bolo
Tappers use a kayobong to
contain resin and kiba to transport
the resin
Tappers use bolo
Tappers use a sarad to
contain resin and rarong to
transport the resin
Tappers clean their resins using
bolo to remove dirt and other
impurities
Classifier weighs the resin and
sorts the resin into tipak, class a
and class b
Price of resin:
Tipak (PhP 30/kg or USD 0.59)
Class a (PhP 28/kg or USD 0.55)
Class b (PhP 10/kg or USD 0.20)
Resins are stored in a designated
area
Not practiced
Not practiced
Price of resin:
PhP 18-20/kg (USD 0.360.40)
No storage area for collected
resin
while almaciga lalaki has reddish inner bark. In terms of
resin yield, the tappers observed that almaciga babae
produced more resin than almaciga lalaki. The tappers also
consider the location of the tree and its crown density in the
tree selection. They choose the tree with a higher crown
spread because they believe it would exude more resin.
They do not tap trees that are in downhill areas for safety
and practical reasons. Some studies reported a positive
relationship between the crown ratio and resin flow of pine
species (Davis et al. 2012; Rodríguez-García et al. 2014;
DARACAN et al. – Almaciga resin tapping and collection practices
Lai et al. 2017; Seyfullah et al. 2018) emphasizing that
trees with larger crown biomass would be richer in
carbohydrates available for defense (resin production and
resin duct formation). Lai et al. (2017) explained that the
accumulation of greater carbon surpluses by trees with
larger crown sizes makes possible the shift of carbohydrate
allocation from growth to defense, leading to more
production of resin.
Palawan tappers have fewer considerations in selecting
the A. philippinensis trees to be tapped. Tappers from
Brooke’s Point classify A. philippinensis trees based on
resin color - puti for those trees with white resin and
bunga-bunga for those with red resin, also known as
“kemanga” among the Pala’wan. The tappers from
Marufinas in Puerto Princesa, on the other hand, select A.
philippinensis trees based on bark characteristics such as
thickness and hardness. They believe that thin and hard
bark which cannot easily be removed or peeled off from the
trunk will produce low amounts of resin, while thick and
soft barks will give high resin yield. This local practice is
supported by different scientific studies. It was reported
that there is a positive correlation of bark thickness with
resin production not only in A. philippinensis (FAO 1995)
but also in other resin-producing species like Pinus
merkusii (Susilowati and Rachmat 2018) and lacquerproducing Toxicodendron vernicifluum varieties (Zhao et
al. 2013). There is also a study which found that bark
thickness is directly related to tree protection mechanisms
against external mechanical disturbances such as wind that
can damage resin ducts, thus affecting resin yield
(Susilowati and Rachmat 2018). The study of Tolera et al.
(2013) on the inner bark anatomy of Boswellia papyrifera
can also explain why thicker bark is preferred in tapping.
According to this study, inner bark can be segmented into
three zones: intact, partially dilated, and highly dilated
zones. More resin canals are present in the partially dilated
and intact zones which occupy the bulk of inner bark. The
thicker the bark, the larger area being occupied by these
resin canal-rich zones.
Another factor that was considered by tappers in the
three sites is the diameter at breast height (dbh) of the tree.
Most Palawan tappers consider trees with a dbh of >45 cm
as suitable for tapping (Razal et al. 2013). They estimate
the dbh using commonly available measuring units like
dangkal (length of a stretched-out hand from the tip of the
pinky finger to the tip of the thumb) and dipa (length of
both arms stretched out). Some tappers use car tire,
electrical post, or drum container to estimate dbh.
Meanwhile, tappers in Gov. Generoso follow the FPRDIDOST guidelines and select trees with at least 40 cm dbh.
They measure the tree dbh using a steel tape which they
were trained to use.. However, in all the sites, some tappers
do not strictly follow this dbh requirement and tap trees
with dbh smaller than the suggested range. During the site
visit in Marufinas, the team encountered a small tree that
was already subjected to tapping (Figure 1). The use of a
calibrated rope for dbh measurement is recommended by
the study team especially in Palawan to avoid
underestimation of the tree dbh and the tapping of trees
smaller than the prescribed dbh.
5599
Figure 1. Tapped Agathis philippinensis tree with diameter at
breast height below 40 cm
The belief of tappers that tree size affects resin yield is
supported by several studies. Based on the FPRDI-DOST
guidelines, tapping should be done only on trees with a dbh
of at least 40 cm (Ella and Tongacan 1992). It is
recommended to avoid tapping A. philippinensis trees with
60 cm dbh and larger. Similarly, Hadiyane et al. (2015)
reported that the production of resin from Pinus merkusii
was affected by tree diameter. The average resin
production of diameter class 38-40 cm exhibited higher
resin yield than the average values of the other smaller
diameter classes within the range of 30-38 cm (Hadiyane et
al. 2015). Based on the findings in these studies, it was
recommended that only A. philippinensis trees with at least
40-60 cm dbh should be tapped. Ella (2000) pointed out
that with a larger bark surface and heavier crown, a bigger
tree would produce more resin than a smaller one. Ella
further stated that resin yield increased with increasing
diameters up to 60 cm, and then decreased at higher
diameter classes.
Based on observations from the three sites, tappers used
different criteria to determine if a tree would give low or
high resin yield. They relied on the physical features of the
tree or of the resin itself. Further research on which
varieties of A. philippinensis could produce higher resin
yield is being conducted. This will aid in the proper
identification of trees to be tapped and could help avoid
mistrials and reduce the number of trees that are damaged
or killed.
5600
B I OD I V E R S I TA S 21 (12): 5595-5604, December 2020
Cleaning of the tree and immediate surroundings
Another pre-tapping activity that is done is cleaning the
A. philippinensis tree and its immediate surroundings. This
includes weeding and removal of pocked-mark barks,
fallen leaves, and dirt within the immediate area of the
standing tree to avoid the accumulation of impurities when
the resin flows from the cut. This is also done to avoid
insect attacks such as by ants and termites that may
eventually cause deterioration of the tree, leading to lesser
resin flow (Razal et al. 2013). Tappers from Gov. Generoso
and the older tappers from Brooke’s Point perform this
activity, and this should be replicated by the younger
tappers from Brooke’s Point and Puerto Princesa City. It
was observed that the resin collected by tappers who
cleaned the trees have lesser impurities embedded in the
resin. FAO (1995) emphasized that harvesting, cleaning,
and handling practices of resins have the greatest influence
on the quality of the product, and hence, every effort
should be made to improve these activities. Moreover,
clean resin, which is considered good quality resin by
buyers and processing companies, is more sought after and
commands higher prices in the market. Impurities
embedded in the resin lower its price, therefore, decreasing
the benefits that the tappers can get from it. Clean resin
also has a higher grade based on the system of grading
developed by FPRDI-DOST (Ella and Tongacan 1992).
Actual tapping activities
Choice of tapping tools
Tappers from the three study sites use similar tools in
tapping, like bolo or machete to make incisions on the bark
of the tree and any heavy piece of wood, usually a fallen
branch which is available in the area to serve as a mallet.
With assistance from the government, a tapping tool
consisting of a 17 cm-long knife with a curved blade and a
special tip for cutting, costing around one hundred fifty
pesos (Figure 2) was developed by Gov. Generoso tappers.
However, due to the difficulty in using this knife for
making a cut on the bark of A. philippinensis, most of the
tappers reverted to the use of bolo as their tapping tool. The
use of a bolo as a tapping tool in Palawan was previously
reported by Razal et al. (2013). Excessive or deep cuts
penetrating the cambium was observed in the field. This is
due to the uncontrolled cut depth caused by the bolo.
Similarly, it was reported that deeply tapped and
“overtapped” A. philippinensis trees were found in
Cleopatra’s Needle Critical Habitat (CNCH) in Palawan.
Batak, one of the indigenous people’s groups in CNCH,
used machete as their main tapping tool (Vermeer et al.
2017). The cambium is penetrated during tapping due to
the uncontrolled use of the tool in removing the bark of the
tree. Batak tappers shifted from using tapping knives to
machete as their tapping tool since the former is too
expensive for them to buy (Vermeer et al. 2017). For these
reasons, the use of a wood chisel, a tool with flat and wide
cutting edge instead of bolo is recommended for tapping. It
would be easier to use and control with the help of a
wooden mallet. Hence, its use is suggested to
inexperienced and beginner tappers.
Figure 2. Specialized tapping knife developed for Gov. Generoso
tappers
Choice of bark incision shape and dimensions
The tappers from the three sites make different incision
or wound shapes and dimensions on the bark of A.
philippinensis trees (Figure 3). Gov. Generoso tappers
make rectangular cuts with a width of 30 cm and height of
5 or 10 cm. On the other hand, tappers from Brooke’s Point
have more varied tapping techniques. Older tappers make
diamond- and triangular-shaped wounds as described by
Razal et al. (2013), with each side measuring
approximately 6 cm, as well as quadrilateral shapes, while
others just tap the trees and form no particular size nor
shape of the wound. However, according to Guerrero (pers.
comm., 2020), tappers in Brooke’s Point would initially
make a rectangular cut, but the subsequent maintenance
tapping, called “ipat” or “pegipat,” is in triangular form as
the tappers believed that it is the best way to get the "tipak"
high-grade resin in large sizes. Resin from an incision that
is spread could easily fall, break and would be full of
impurities.
In Marufinas, Puerto Princesa City, tappers make
rectangular cuts with no specific dimensions. Slanting cuts
were also employed by Palawan tappers, which extend to
greater than 2/3 of the circumference of the tree (Razal et
al. 2013). The data on the two-day resin yield gathered
from the field (Table 2) shows that the difference in the
cutting shape and dimension among the three sites is
statistically significant (with p=0.038 and treatment
mean=4.20). The rectangular cut, which was introduced by
FPRDI-DOST to Gov. Generoso tappers yields higher resin
compared to the triangular and quadrilateral wound shapes
practiced in Brooke’s Point. In the FPRDI-DOST
guidelines on the proper A. philippinensis resin tapping
techniques, horizontal cut 1 to 2 cm wide and 30 cm long
using a sharp knife or bolo is recommended (Ella and
Tongacan 1992). However, the comparison of resin yield
should be taken with precaution since the number (3 per
type of cut) of trees is limited and the yield values were
obtained only for 2 days of tapping, which were done on
different dates in different sites. In the study of Seyfullah et
al. (2018), it was mentioned that the amount of resin
secreted appeared to be related to the size of the injury.
DARACAN et al. – Almaciga resin tapping and collection practices
5601
Table 2. Resin yield of Agathis philippinensis trees from the three sites after 2 days of tapping
Resin yield (g)
Brooke’s Point,
Governor Generoso,
Sap tapping
Palawan
Davao Oriental
Triangular-shaped
Quadrilateral method
Rectangular method
1st
0.8698
0.5183
3.7867
2nd
2.8177
4.3546
9.2879
3rd
1.1647
1.4215
7.3382
Average
1.6174a
2.0981 a
6.8043 b
Note: Means that do not share a letter are significantly different
Puerto Princesa City,
Palawan
Rectangular method
6.4829
4.4721
3.3574
5.4775 b
A
B
C
D
Figure 3. Tapping incisions made on the bark of Agathis philippinensis trees by tappers in (A) Governor Generoso, (B & C) Brooke’s
Point, Palawan and (D) Marufinas, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines
affect tree survival due to the anatomical and chemical
defenses of conifer bark against stem infesting insects and
pathogens (Krokene 2015), it is critical that the removal of
woody tissue is controlled and does not damage the
cambium since the formation of new cells, healing, as well
as the vulnerability to attacks by decay agents, depend on
this tree layer (Ella and Tongacan 1992).
Figure 4. Dead Agathis philippinensis tree in Marufinas, Puerto
Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines
It was also observed during the site visits that the depth
of cut depended on the knowledge and skills of the tappers.
In general, the tappers do not have a specific protocol for
the depth of cut, and most of the tappers still make wide
and deep cuts into the tree. In Puerto Princesa City, the
team encountered dead A. philippinensis trees (Figure 4)
which died due to overtapping, based on the tappers’ own
account. Previous studies stressed the importance of depth
of cut in tapping trees for resin production. Williams et al.
(2017) cited that radial growth is not possible anymore on
the tapped sides of the trunk if the cambium is damaged
mechanically. While the removal of woody tissue may not
Rechipping
With rechipping, the resin that accumulates around the
bark incision is removed and a new cut (about 3 cm of
bark) is added above the wound to increase resin flow
(Vermeer et al. 2017). In Gov. Generoso, rechipping is
normally done by creating a thin cut just above the
previous cut. When to do rechipping is the tappers’
decision, as tappers claimed to perform it once a week,
once a month, twice a month, once every three months,
etc.) Tappers also allow the resin to harden before
collection and rechipping. Brooke’s Point tappers employ
various methods of rechipping such as making a new
wound with the same dimensions above the previous
wound, or cutting the upper portion of the original wound,
enlarging the original bark opening. Normally, they do
rechipping after 15 days. Rechipping by tappers in
Marufinas is done just above the previous cut, usually once
a month. However, for both sites in Palawan, some
previously tapped A. philippinensis trees were not regularly
rechipped. This is true of the trees that belong to tappers
who have other sources of income. Some A. philippinensis
trees had numerous uncollected small and discolored lumps
of resins that remain attached to the bark or stem. The
rechipping practices by Gov. Generoso tappers, in which a
thin cut just above the previously made cut is made, can be
replicated by the Palawan tappers to avoid damaging the
cambium. The depth of the new cut can be controlled to
lessen the injury to the tree. According to Samanta et al.
5602
B I OD I V E R S I TA S 21 (12): 5595-5604, December 2020
(2016), repeated wounding is needed at the right season to
maximize Commiphora wightii (guggal) resin yield.
Frequent rechipping is also believed to increase the flow
rate of resin, although it reduces the purity of the exuded
product due to the presence of chips of bark, wood, and
foreign materials in the resin (Ella and Tongacan 1992).
Wrapping/sealing of tapped portion using plastic
As mentioned earlier, dirt like stones, soil, dried leaves,
chipped wood, and bark lower the quality of the harvested
resin. It was also noticed that in all the sites, a significant
amount of resin had flowed and accumulated on the
ground. To lessen dirt and wastage of the resin, some
tappers in Gov. Generoso would attach, with wooden pegs,
a clear plastic bag just beneath the cut as receptacle for the
exuding resin, and then place another plastic sheet above
the wound and the mouth of the bag. The same practice
was reported in Brazil, where the collection of oleoresins
from pine also uses plastic bags that are belted around the
trunk (Rodrigues-Correa et al. 2013). Boschiero and
Tomazello-Filho (2012) also stated that fixing a plastic bag
by tying it around the trunk is a basic step in pine resin
tapping. This is to minimize contamination of the resin by
rainwater and other foreign materials. However, the use of
plastic cover is not being practiced by all tappers in Gov.
Generoso, as there are claims that the practice facilitates
collection by illegal tappers and outsiders. In Palawan,
tappers do not use any material to wrap and seal the tapped
portion of the tree. They just leave the wound open, with
resin exposed until it hardens, resulting in the accumulation
of dirt on the resin. The Palawan tappers can harvest
cleaner resin if they adopt the practice of the Gov.
Generoso tappers.
Post-tapping activities
Collection of resin
The frequency of resin collection depends on many
factors, such as tappers' needs, resin availability, and the
weather. A whole variety of responses were given by the
tappers from the three study sites on the frequency of their
resin collection to include once a day, once or twice a
week, once, twice or thrice a month, every after 45 days,
once every two, every three months, etc. Razal et al. (2013)
reported that Palawan resin gatherers do the harvesting
once or twice a month.
All the tappers from the three study sites use a bolo to
remove the hardened resin from the tree. Razal et al. (2013)
earlier described that Palawan tappers scraped off resins
from the bark using a sharp bolo. The use of a bolo does
not always lead to the complete and clean separation of the
resin from the tree. The hardened resin may be broken into
small pieces, resulting in wastage or losses because the
small fragments are usually left behind during collection.
According to some experienced tappers in Palawan, they
do not remove all of the resin from the wound and even
allow some to fall to the ground and gather around the base
of the tree to serve as a deterrent to termite attack (Razal et
al. 2013). The terpenoids present in the resin may have
combined chemical toxicity and repellency that render
them capable of defense (Krokene 2015). Interestingly, the
Palawan tappers devise their own environment-friendly
containers to collect and transport the harvested resins.
Tappers in Brooke’s Point use a kayobong (Figure 5.A),
which is made from kaong (Arenga pinnata) leaves and
serves like an entrapment that prevents the resin from
falling to the ground and being contaminated with dirt.
Marufinas tappers in Puerto Princesa City collect the
hardened resin with sarad (Figure 5.B), which is made of
used rice sack and rattan.
To transport the resin from the collection site to their
homes or the point-of-sale, tappers in Brooke’s Point
devised a bigger container called kiba (Figure 5.C) made of
woven rattan stems and palm/kaong leaves, which can be
carried on their backs and keeps the hands free for holding
onto something as they descend from the mountains. They
will carefully arrange and pack up to 60 kgs of resin into
the kiba, according to the size of the resin lumps. This
exceeds the volume previously reported by Razal et al.
(2013), which described a kiba that can carry about 40 kgs
of resin at a time. Likewise, Marufinas tappers improvise a
container called rarong (Figure 5.D) made from rattan in
transporting resin from the collection site to their respective
storage areas. In Gov. Generoso, tappers use plastic bags or
used sacks for collecting resin.
A
B
C
D
Figure 5. Post-tapping tools used by tappers of Brooke’s Point and Puerto Princesa City, Philippines: A. Kayobong; B. Sarad; C. Kiba.
and D. Rarong
DARACAN et al. – Almaciga resin tapping and collection practices
A
B
Figure 6. Governor Generoso's (A) and Brooke's Point's (B)
bodega showing A. philippinensis resin stored in sacks
Cleaning of resin
Razal et al. (2013) described the resin cleaning process
as one that involved the immersion of resins in water to
allow the pieces of bark and other impurities to either float
on the water surface or to settle at the bottom of the
container. Afterward, the resins are chipped using sharp
knives to remove unclean portions of the resin. In the
present study, it was found that cleaning activities are not
religiously practiced in the three study sites. When done, as
in Gov. Generoso and Brooke’s Point, tappers remove dirt
from the resin by scraping them off with their bolo. This is
usually performed at their houses before transporting the
resin to the warehouse or the point-of-sale. Intact and clean
resins command a better price. But for the tappers from
Puerto Princesa City, the collected resin is sold as is. They
do not perform resin cleaning since according to them,
these practices do not lead to a higher selling price for the
resin. In Java, Indonesia, instead of removing foreign
matter and impurities from the collected resin, sieving and
handpicking are being done (FAO 1995).
Sorting of resin
No uniform sorting and pricing scheme for the A.
philippinensis resin was observed in the three sites. Pricing
is not affected by the resin’s physical properties in Gov.
Generoso and is mainly dictated by the buyers. The resin is
sold at PhP 20/kg (USD 0.39) regardless of size or color. It
is worth noting that in Gov. Generoso, they perform
solubility test using lacquer thinner to determine the resin
class, especially when the resin being sold were sourced
from new sites. Razal et al. (2013) reported that higher
solubility means fewer insoluble materials (i.e., dirt, soil,
bark) resulting in a higher recovery of the resin, a quality
that is good for processing and suitability for export. As in
Gov. Generoso, the price of resin is also dictated by the
buyers in Puerto Princesa City, hence sorting of resin is
hardly done. The resin is sold at PhP 18-20/kg (USD 0.360.40). In Brooke’s Point, the classifier of the SBABP sorts
the resin into three classes: tipak (PhP 30/kg or USD 0.59),
class A (PhP 28/kg or USD 0.55) and class B (PhP 10/kg or
USD 0.20) based on perceived resin “wholeness” and
“cleanliness.”
5603
In the value chain study of A. philippinensis resin
conducted by Razal et al. (2013), it was reported that in
Palawan, the resin was usually sold to a kapatas or ahente
at PhP 22.00 per kilogram. The tappers are ensnared in an
informal credit system or cash advance practice through the
kapatas or ahente where the tappers could get “cash
advance” or loan before the delivery of the resin. However,
because the kapatas pays a low price for the resin and
imposes high interest on the loan, this practice diminishes
the tapper’s net income (Razal et al. 2013). According to
FAO (1995), in Indonesia, traded copal was distinguished
by their hardness, color, size of the pieces as well as the
state of cleanliness. Pale, clean pieces with high solubility
in alcohol are of the best quality. They also reported that
resin quality depends on the harvesting, cleaning, and
handling practices; thus, it is important to improve these
activities. Clean resin has always been considered by
buyers and processors to be of good quality, thereby
commanding higher demand and price. No further
processing was carried out until the resin is formulated into
finished products by the manufacturers. Subsequent
processing being done by the end-users include heat
treatment and dissolution in a suitable solvent (FAO 1995).
Storage of resin
In Gov. Generoso, the tappers sell the resin to
designated buyers from within the respective barangays.
The Municipal Tourism Officer, who doubles as resin
consolidator, goes around the different barangays to collect
the resins from the designated buyers to ensure there will
be enough inventory for the next shipment. A warehouse
(bodega) is maintained by the consolidator in the town
proper which serves as storage area for the collected resin
(Figure 6.A). There are laborers in the bodega who reweigh
the resin using a 500-kg platform scale and repack them in
50 to 80-kg sacks, being careful to keep them clean and
solid.
Razal et al. (2013) reported that in Palawan, there was a
warehouse or point-of-sale where the kapatas weighs,
sorts, grades, and packs resins delivered by the tappers.
These are still the same warehouse practices in Brooke’s
Point as observed in the current study (Figure 6.B). SBABP
buys the resins from the tappers and maintains the
warehouse. Puerto Princesa City tappers temporarily store
their resin in an area of their choice before sales, unlike that
being practiced in both Gov. Generoso and Brooke’s Point.
The tapping practices, which are steeped in native
traditions and cultural beliefs, have been passed on from
generation to generation among the Pala’wan tappers.
Some tappers also uphold their customary laws such as
avoiding spitting and urinating on the A. philippinensis
trees. Others would utter a prayer and perform rituals like
offering eggs or planting a coin on the soil near the tree
before tapping, believing that these will help increase resin
yield. Spraying with sulfuric acid during tapping to
stimulate resin flow was introduced by FPRDI-DOST (Ella
and Tongacan 1992), but the tappers refused to adopt the
method. They prefer the resin to flow naturally because
there is no additional cost entailed and they consider it
safer for the tapper, the trees, and the environment.
5604
B I OD I V E R S I TA S 21 (12): 5595-5604, December 2020
In conclusion, the results of the study show that there
are similarities and differences in the tapping and collection
practices of A. philippinensis resin in different sites. But
there are unique practices that were proven to be beneficial
in some sites that may be worth replicating in the others to
improve their A. philippinensis resin tapping and
collection. Improved tapping helps boost indigenous
peoples’ incomes, sustain and protect the trees, and
conserve biodiversity.
Tappers collect resins depending on their needs,
availability, and season. The tappers agree that tapping
resin as a livelihood is hard. The team’s field visits
confirmed the harrowing distances covered to reach the
tapping sites, and in returning to the village centers while
carrying the resin on their backs. For many households in
the three study sites, tapping A. philippinensis resin is an
alternative source of income, preferably done during the
dry season when traversing the mountain is less difficult.
Future research undertakings on the following areas
need to be conducted to further improve A. philippinensis
resin production: (i) identification of higher-yielding
varieties of A. philippinensis, (ii) determination of factors
affecting resin yield and quality (iii) developing less
damaging and high-yielding tapping methods, and (iv)
mandating grading and pricing standards for A.
philippinensis resin.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Department of Science
and Technology – Philippine Council for Agriculture,
Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and
Development (DOST-PCAARRD) under the DOST Grantin-Aid Program. The authors are also grateful to all the
tappers who willingly shared their knowledge and
practices, and to the local partner organizations (LGU of
Gov. Generoso, Davao Oriental, Nagkakaisang Tribu ng
Palawan and Non-Timber Forest Products Exchange
Programme (NTFP-EP) Philippines, and the Office of the
Protected Area Superintendent of the Puerto Princesa
Underground River) for their generous assistance.
REFERENCES
Boschiero FAT, Tomazello-Filho M. 2012. Anatomical aspects of resin
canals and oleoresin production in pine trees. Resin: Biol Chem Appl
67-86. ISBN: 978-81-308-0493-4.
Davis RS, Hood S, Bentz BJ. 2012. Fire-injured ponderosa pine provides
a pulsed resource for bark beetles. Can J For Res 42: 2022-2036.
DOI: 10.1139/x2012-147.
Frezza C, Venditti A, De Vita D, Toniolo C, Franceschin M, Ventrone A,
Tomassini L, Foddai S, Guiso M, Nicoletti M, Bianco A, Serafini M.
2020. Phytochemistry, chemotaxonomy, and biological activities of
the Araucariaceae family - A review. MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Plants 9 (7), 888. DOI: 10.3390/plants9070888Licensee.
ERDB-DENR [Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau]. 2013.
Compilation of selected forest species from Vol. 1 Nos. 1-10, 2013.
Rise Information Series on Ecosystems (RISE) 25 (2 & 3).
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Philippines.
Ella AB, Tongacan AL. 1992. Techniques in tapping almaciga (Agathis
philippinensis Warb.) for sustained productivity of the tree: The
Philippine experience. FPRDI J 2 (1&2): 73-79.
Ella AB. 2000. Improved tapping of almaciga tree for sustained resin
yield. Seminar proceedings: Harvesting of non-wood forest products.
Joint FAO/ECE/ILO Committee on Forest Technology, Management,
and Training. Menemen-izmir, Turkey.
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization]. 1995. Gums, resins, and
latexes of plant origin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations, Rome.
Hadiyane A, Sulistyawati E, Asharina W, Dungani R. 2015. A study on
production of resin from Pinus merkusii Jungh. Et De Vriese in the
Bosscha Observatory Area, West Java-Indonesia. Asian J Plant Sci 14
(2): 89-93.
Krokene P. 2015. Conifer defense and resistance to bark beetles. In: Vega
FE, Hofstetter RW (eds) Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of
Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier, New York.
Lai M, Dong L, Yi M, Sun S, Zhang Y, Fu L, Xu Z, Lei L, Leng C, Zhang
L. 2017. Genetic variation, heritability and genotype X environment
interactions of resin yield, growth traits, and morphologic traits for
Pinus elliottii at three progeny trials. Forests 8 (11), 409. DOI:
10.3390/f8110409.
Mordeno MC. 2019 August 7. Almaciga: Lighting up lives in Governor
Generoso (Second Part). Minda news (This is our Mindanao).
https://www.mindanews.com/special-reports/2019/08/almacigalighting-up-lives-in-governor-generoso-second-of-three-parts/
Perez D. 2014. Governance and leadership of the Pala’wan Tribe of
Palawan, Philippines. Asia Pac J Educ Arts Sci 1 (5): 136-143.
Razal RA, Maralit AC, Colili NB, Alsa LN, Canlas RP. 2013. Value
Chain Study for Almaciga resin. Non-Timber Forest Products Task
Force.
Rodrigues-Correa K, De Lima J, Fett-Neto A. 2013. Pine oleoresin:
tapping green chemicals, biofuels, food protection, and carbon
sequestration from multipurpose trees. Food Energy Secur 1 (2): 8193 DOI: 10.1002/fes3.13.
Rodríguez-García A, López R, Martín JA, Pinillos F, Gil L. 2014. Resin
yield in Pinus pinaster is related to tree dendrometry, stand density
and tapping-induced systemic changes in xylem anatomy. For Ecol
Manag 313, 47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.038.
Samanta JN, Mandal K, Saravanan R, Gajbhiye N, Ravi, V. 2016.
Influence of tapping position, intensity of tapping and season on
gummosis of guggal (Commiphora wightii), oleo-gum-resin yield and
quality. Indian J Agric Sci 86 (1): 143-146.
Seyfullah LJ, Beimforde C, Dal Corso J, Perrichot V, Rikkinen J, Schmidt
AR. 2018. Production and preservation of resins - past and present.
Biol Rev 93 (2018): 1684-1714. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12414.
Sharma SC, Prasad N, Pandey SK, Giri SK. 2018. Status of resin tapping
and scope of improvement: A review. AMA, Agricultural
Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 49: 16-26.
Sopsop LB, Buot, Jr. IE. 2011. Human-forest interaction in Aborlan Guba
System, Palawan Island, Philippines: Implications for conservation
and management. Asia Life Sci 20 (1): 153-171.
Susilowati A, Rachmat H. 2018. Growth and resin production structure of
Pinus merkusii under different environment conditions (Case study in
Perum Perhutani Seedling Seed Orchard). IOP Conf Ser Earth
Environ
Sci
209
(1):
012028.
DOI:
10.1088/17551315/209/1/012028.
Tolera M, Menger D, Sass-Klaassen U, Sterck F, Copini P, Bongers F.
2013. Resin secretory structures of Boswellia papyrifera and
implications for frankincense yield. Ann Bot 111 (1): 61-68. DOI:
10.1093/aob/mcs236.
Vermeer L, Bocxe K, Zuidema P, Sopsop L, Hoevenaars K, ReyesAntonio R. 2017. Effects of resin harvesting on the status of the
Agathis philippinensis population in the Cleopatra’s Needle Critical
Habitat, the Philippines. Palawan Sci 9: 1-16.
Williams R, Nauman C, Zhu J. 2017. The effects of resin tapping on the
radial growth of Masson pine trees in South China - A case study.
Agric
Res
Technol
8
(2):
1-4.
DOI:
10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.08.555732.
Zhao M, Liu C, Zheng G, Wei S, Hu Z. 2013. Comparative studies of bark
structure, lacquer yield and urushiol content of cultivated
Toxicodendron vernicifluum varieties. N Z J Bot 51 (1): 13-21. DOI:
10.1080/0028825X.2012.731005.