05.04.2013 Views

DEFORESTATION AROUND THE WORLD - India Environment Portal

DEFORESTATION AROUND THE WORLD - India Environment Portal

DEFORESTATION AROUND THE WORLD - India Environment Portal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>DEFORESTATION</strong><br />

<strong>AROUND</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WORLD</strong><br />

Edited by Paulo Moutinho


Deforestation Around the World<br />

Edited by Paulo Moutinho<br />

Published by InTech<br />

Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia<br />

Copyright © 2012 InTech<br />

All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0<br />

license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for<br />

commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which<br />

ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. After this work<br />

has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in<br />

any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the<br />

work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify<br />

the original source.<br />

As for readers, this license allows users to download, copy and build upon published<br />

chapters even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly<br />

credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications.<br />

Notice<br />

Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors<br />

and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher. No responsibility is accepted for the<br />

accuracy of information contained in the published chapters. The publisher assumes no<br />

responsibility for any damage or injury to persons or property arising out of the use of any<br />

materials, instructions, methods or ideas contained in the book.<br />

Publishing Process Manager Maja Bozicevic<br />

Technical Editor Teodora Smiljanic<br />

Cover Designer InTech Design Team<br />

First published March, 2012<br />

Printed in Croatia<br />

A free online edition of this book is available at www.intechopen.com<br />

Additional hard copies can be obtained from orders@intechopen.com<br />

Deforestation Around the World, Edited by Paulo Moutinho<br />

p. cm.<br />

ISBN 978-953-51-0417-9


Contents<br />

Preface IX<br />

Part 1 Deforestation Impacts 1<br />

Chapter 1 The Climatic Effects of Deforestation<br />

in South and Southeast Asia 3<br />

Rachindra Mawalagedara and Robert J. Oglesby<br />

Chapter 2 Impacts of Deforestation on Climate<br />

and Water Resources in Western Amazon 21<br />

Ranyére Silva Nóbrega<br />

Chapter 3 Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses 35<br />

Maria Anete Lallo<br />

Chapter 4 Impact of Deforestation on the Sustainability<br />

of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor 49<br />

Vani Starry Manoharan, John Mecikalski,<br />

Ronald Welch and Aaron Song<br />

Chapter 5 Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation<br />

and Desertification of Limestone Terrain 73<br />

Andrej Kranjc<br />

Chapter 6 Landslides Caused Deforestation 95<br />

Diandong Ren, Lance M. Leslie and Qingyun Duan<br />

Chapter 7 Deforestation Dynamics: A Review and Evaluation<br />

of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece 123<br />

Serafeim Polyzos and Dionysios Minetos<br />

Part 2 Mapping Deforestation 143<br />

Chapter 8 Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation and Land Use<br />

Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria 145<br />

Nathaniel O. Adeoye, Albert A. Abegunde and Samson Adeyinka


VI Contents<br />

Chapter 9 Unsupervised Classification<br />

of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 171<br />

Antonia Macedo-Cruz, I. Villegas-Romero,<br />

M. Santos-Peñas and G. Pajares-Martinsanz<br />

Chapter 10 Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics 187<br />

Anthony Stocks, Andrew Noss,<br />

Malgorzata Bryja and Santiago Arce<br />

Chapter 11 Sustainable Forest Management Techniques 203<br />

K.P. Chethan, Jayaraman Srinivasan, Kumar Kriti and Kaki Sivaji<br />

Chapter 12 Bunjil Forest Watch<br />

a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service 229<br />

Chris Goodman<br />

Chapter 13 Remnant Vegetation Analysis<br />

of Guanabara Bay Basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,<br />

Using Geographical Information System 253<br />

Luzia Alice Ferreira de Moraes<br />

Part 3 Preventing Deforestation 281<br />

Chapter 14 Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems:<br />

Catalyzing Conservation Contagion 283<br />

Robert H. Horwich, Jonathan Lyon, Arnab Bose and Clara B. Jones<br />

Chapter 15 Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent<br />

and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica 319<br />

Óscar M. Chaves<br />

Chapter 16 Agroforestry Systems<br />

and Local Institutional Development<br />

for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 333<br />

Lorena Soto-Pinto, Miguel A. Castillo-Santiago<br />

and Guillermo Jiménez-Ferrer<br />

Chapter 17 Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 351<br />

Yoshito Takasaki


Preface<br />

Forests are giant reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity that must remain largely intact<br />

if we want to bring global warming under control and preserve life on earth.<br />

However, over the last decade, 13 million ha/year of forests have been deforested in<br />

the word. South America and Africa present the highest deforestation rates (> 3.4<br />

million ha/yr) and forest losses were also intense in many places of Asia. Although<br />

studies don’t always agree, they generally indicate that deforestation causes are<br />

related to infrastructure investments, expansions of agricultural and pasture frontiers,<br />

land tenure issues, absence of adequate surveillance by the government, high demand<br />

for forest products (wood), rural settlements, mining, and logging. International<br />

growing demand for commodities and global land crises can also affect deforestation.<br />

Consequently, the impacts resulting from deforestation can include changes in the<br />

rainfall regime - increasing the risk of forest fires during dry seasons - negative<br />

changes on river level and on the quality of water, as well as enormous biodiversity<br />

losses, considering that more than half of the animals and plants living on the planet<br />

live in forests. Deforestation also dramatically affects human population living in or<br />

from the forests. Indigenous peoples and traditional communities -the natural<br />

guardians of the forests - have seen their territories been reduced or invaded by<br />

deforesters. However, they are the most promising alternative to protect the forests<br />

and simultaneously create a sustainable economy based on forest products.<br />

Despite global consequences, deforestation presents local/regional-based dynamics.<br />

This book provides a general view about this dynamics, incorporating the diversity of<br />

causes, impacts and actions to prevent deforestation in several places around the<br />

world. The chapters are divided in three sections: (I) Deforestation Impacts, (III)<br />

Mapping Deforestation, and (II) Preventing Deforestation.<br />

Chapter 1 (Oglesby) discusses the impacts of land cover changes on the climate in<br />

South and Southeast Asia, and Chapter 2 (Nóbrega) presents the effects of<br />

deforestation on the climate and hydrological cycle in Rondonia state, Brazil, that can<br />

have potential effects on the biodiversity, as indicated by Chapter 3’s (Lallo) study on<br />

parasites population in Brazil. Chapter 4 (Manoharan and colleagues), describes how<br />

deforestation and changes in physical and climate parameters could affect the<br />

potential of environmental protection provided by the Mesoamerican Biological<br />

Corridor (Central America). Then, Chapter 5 (Kranjc) exemplifies the large


X Preface<br />

environmental consequences of deforestation in the Dinaric Karst region, Slovenia,<br />

and finally, Chapter 6 (Diandong et al.) shows how disturbs caused by landslides can<br />

provoke vegetation losses at landscape scale.<br />

The first section is closed by Chapter 7 (Polyzos et al.) and relates the forest land use<br />

changes in Greece and how it has affected the regional and economic development.<br />

The next section, Mapping Deforestation, begins with Chapter 8 by Adeoye et al. They<br />

use a set of images data to analyze the historical deforestation in southwestern Nigeria<br />

demonstrating the potential of the remote-sensing and GIS technology for forest<br />

conservation. Chapter 9 (Macedo-Cruz, et al.) suggests a new remote-sensing<br />

methodology, an unsupervised classification method, with potential to map<br />

deforestation. Stocks et al. (Chapter 10) demonstrate how deforestation mapping is<br />

important for forest protection in the Waodani indigenous land, Ecuador, and Chapter<br />

11 (Jayaraman et al.) discusses the potential of the Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)<br />

as an accessible and low cost technology that could be useful to monitor the<br />

environment in a large area. Chapter 12 (Goodman) proposes a free public online<br />

service to map the recent forest disturbances in one particular area and explains how it<br />

could attend local communities. Finally, Chapter 13 (De Moraes) provides a timeseries<br />

of land-cover in the Guanabara Bay Basin, Brazil, to demonstrate how remote<br />

sensing data is essential to measure the critical changes in vegetation remnants of<br />

Atlantic Forest, the most deforested forest in Brazil, to offer better information for<br />

decision-makers.<br />

On the last section, Preventing Deforestation, Chapter 14 (Horwich et al.)<br />

demonstrates how the community-based initiatives positively affect the conservation<br />

of forests in three different countries, Belize, Namibia and <strong>India</strong>. Chapter 15 (Chaves)<br />

bring us a review on the potential of different conservation strategies (ecotourism,<br />

payments for environmental services, private reserves, and environmental education)<br />

to mitigate deforestation in Costa Rica. Chapter 16 (Soto-Pinto et al.) reveals how a<br />

sustainable production (agroforestry), reforestation and forest conservation -<br />

developed by the Scolel Té project is dealing with deforestation in Chiapas State,<br />

Mexico. Finally, the Chapter 17 (Taksaki) provides a critical review on how economic<br />

models for shifting cultivation and deforestation are presented by economists and how<br />

these models can be related to deforestation dynamics.<br />

I hope the study-cases reported here may call attention for the velocity we are losing<br />

our forests in a planetary scale and for inestimable impact that will have in human life<br />

quality, in wild life, in water, soil and air and in the world economy. To keep it short,<br />

it won’t be a surprise if the cost to fix the losses would overcome the investments we<br />

have done to achieve the present unsustainable development.<br />

I am grateful to InTech for the opportunity to edit this volume and the authors with<br />

whom I learned so much about the issues of deforestation around the world. I am also


Preface XI<br />

thankful to Maja Bozicevic, the InTech’s Publishing Manager, who assisted me in the<br />

editing process.<br />

Paulo Moutinho<br />

IPAM - Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia<br />

Brazil


In Memoriam of Cyrene Moutinho


Part 1<br />

Deforestation Impacts


1. Introduction<br />

The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in<br />

South and Southeast Asia<br />

1<br />

Rachindra Mawalagedara and Robert J. Oglesby<br />

University of Nebraska, Lincoln<br />

USA<br />

Deforestation is the removal of the existing natural vegetation cover, especially where the<br />

native cover is largely forest. The growth in the world population has increased the clearing<br />

of forests to obtain fuel and building material, to grow crops and to raise livestock. Over the<br />

past 300 years, 7-11 million km 2 of forest has been cleared (Foley et al. 2005). Deforestation<br />

can have a devastating impact on biodiversity as about 70% of land dwelling animals and<br />

plants are found in forests. Impacts such as land degradation in the absence of forest<br />

regrowth, soil erosion and sedimentation in rivers can have a negative impact on the<br />

environment. These impacts are discussed in greater detail in the other chapters of the book.<br />

Importantly, deforestation can also have strong effects on climate.<br />

In the past it was assumed that the local climate determined the vegetation type in a region<br />

(Nobre et al. 1991) with the amount of incoming solar radiation, precipitation and soil type<br />

determining the vegetation cover of the region. But studies have shown that the atmosphere<br />

and the vegetation interact with each other, exchanging energy, moisture and momentum<br />

(Zeng et al. 1999) and are in a dynamic equilibrium (Nobre et al., 1991). Therefore any<br />

change in vegetation cover can potentially lead to a change in the climate. As deforestation<br />

is a pressing problem in most parts of the world it is important to understand the possible<br />

consequences of deforestation and the mechanisms by which the change in land cover can<br />

alter the climate.<br />

The impacts of land cover changes on the atmosphere have been studied extensively using<br />

both observations and computer models (Suh and Lee, 2004; Lean and Warrilow, 1989;<br />

Kanae et al., 2001; Clark et al., 2001). Previous studies have shown that deforestation can<br />

change the surface albedo, surface roughness and the amount of evapotranspiration<br />

(evapotranspiration is the combined effect of evaporation from the surface and the<br />

transpiration from vegetation) (Gibbard et al., 2005; Oglesby et al., 2010; Hasler et al., 2007)<br />

thus, leading to a modification of the surface energy and moisture budgets.<br />

In order to determine the full climatic impact of deforestation, it is necessary to understand<br />

the behavior of the surface energy and the moisture budgets, as deforestation interacts<br />

directly or indirectly with all the components of these budgets. The surface energy budget<br />

looks at all the possible sources and sinks of energy at the surface as well as any possible<br />

horizontal transport (fluxes) and storage of energy within the seasonally active layer just<br />

below the surface. Over land, incoming and reflected solar radiation (shortwave radiation),


4<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

incoming and outgoing longwave radiation, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux and ground<br />

storage are the important terms that need to be considered for the surface energy budget.<br />

Unlike in the oceans where transport of energy (by the oceans) is significant to the climate<br />

system, horizontal transport of energy in the ground is negligible. The moisture budget is<br />

related to the hydrologic cycle and takes into account precipitation, evaporation, surface<br />

runoff (horizontal transport of water) and storage. If the period considered is a year or<br />

longer, the storage of energy and moisture can be considered negligible. The changes in the<br />

terms of the two budgets can be used to determine the changes in the climate.<br />

To understand how deforestation impacts the climate it is important to understand the<br />

behavior of the terms that make up the surface energy and moisture budgets. The primary<br />

source of energy that contributes to the surface energy budget is the sun. The energy that<br />

sustains the Earth and drives the global circulation is acquired from incoming solar<br />

radiation but is not absorbed directly by the atmosphere. Instead, most of the incoming<br />

solar radiation is first absorbed by the surface. The amount of solar radiation absorbed by<br />

the surface depends on the surface albedo, which determines the fraction of solar<br />

radiation reflected from the surface. The albedo can be expressed either as a percentage or<br />

a fraction, ranging from 100% (1.0) to 0% (0.0) with the former value indicating that all the<br />

incoming radiation is reflected (no absorption) and the latter indicating that no reflection<br />

of radiation takes place (all incoming radiation is absorbed). The surface albedo is related<br />

to the texture and the colour of the surface, with dark rough surfaces (low albedo)<br />

absorbing more energy.<br />

Once the energy is absorbed by the surface, radiative and non-radiative processes transfer it<br />

from the surface to the atmosphere. Part of the absorbed energy warms the surface and is<br />

then emitted as longwave radiation from the surface. The magnitude of the emission is<br />

determined by the temperature and the emissivity of the surface (emissivity depends on the<br />

type of the surface: vegetated, bare soil etc.) and can be determined by the Stephen-<br />

Boltzmann Law. Part of the longwave radiation emitted by the surface is absorbed and<br />

reemitted by the atmosphere (can be calculated using the emissivity and the temperature of<br />

the atmosphere). A portion of the reemitted longwave radiation then acts as a source of<br />

energy for the surface. The remaining energy is partitioned between sensible and latent heat<br />

fluxes which are the non-radiative terms in the surface energy budget. The sensible heat flux<br />

heats the atmosphere in contact with the surface and is a less efficient method of heat<br />

transfer compared to the latent heat flux. It is difficult to measure the sensible heat flux<br />

directly. But it can be calculated easily if the latent heat flux and the Bowen ratio are known.<br />

The Bowen ratio is a measure of the water availability in a region and is the ratio between<br />

sensible heat flux and the latent heat flux. The latent heat flux can be calculated using the<br />

rate of evaporation.<br />

The latent heat exchange, a significant process in the surface energy budget, is proportional<br />

to the amount of evaporation, and thereby provides a link to the surface moisture budget.<br />

The magnitude of the latent energy flux depends both on the amount of moisture available<br />

at the surface and the energy available for evaporation. In the tropics energy is not usually a<br />

limiting factor and hence the dependency is on the water availability. Therefore the energy<br />

that is not emitted as longwave radiation or stored in the ground is partitioned between<br />

sensible and latent heat and this partitioning is determined by the amount of water available<br />

at the surface. The latent heat flux also provides a measure of cooling at the surface due to


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

evapotranspiration (i.e. water absorbs energy from the surface and evaporates thus cooling<br />

the surface). Once the evaporated moisture condenses in the atmosphere the latent energy is<br />

released. The energy released contributes to convection and helps to drive the local<br />

circulation. Therefore the latent heat exchange is not only an important cooling mechanism<br />

but is an important measure of the energy available for regional circulation.<br />

The surface moisture budget accounts for precipitation, evapotranspiration and surface<br />

runoff. The evapotranspiration term links this to the surface energy budget. Changes in<br />

availability and the partitioning of energy can have an impact on evapotranspiration and<br />

hence other terms in the moisture budget. The information from the surface moisture<br />

budget namely, precipitation and evaporation can be used to compute the atmospheric<br />

moisture convergence/divergence which gives the net amount of water vapor transported<br />

into or out of a region by the regional circulation. If the amount of precipitation is larger<br />

than the local evapotranspiration this indicates that the moisture transport into the region<br />

makes a significant contribution to precipitation. Thus the atmospheric moisture<br />

convergence can be used to determine the relative importance of an external moisture<br />

source to that of local evaporation.<br />

As discussed above both surface albedo and emissivity are sensitive to the nature of the land<br />

surface and hence depend on the type of land-use (forest, water, urban etc). The magnitude<br />

of the latent heat flux also depends on the land-use category as the water available for<br />

evapotranspiration changes with land-use. For example a vegetated surface would have<br />

more moisture available for evapotranspiration than barren land, and, as described more<br />

fully later in the chapter, forested land will have higher values than grassland or shrubland.<br />

Therefore it is evident that any change in the land-use in a region will modify both the<br />

surface energy and the moisture budgets.<br />

Deforestation alters the land surface properties and the interactions between the surface and<br />

the atmosphere. Two of the most important changes due to deforestation are the increase in<br />

surface albedo and the decrease in evapotranspiration. The significance of these changes is<br />

discussed in more detail under the methods section.<br />

Deforestation results in two competing effects, warming due to the reduction in<br />

evapotranspiration and a cooling due to the increase surface albedo. Previous studies have<br />

shown that in most regions the magnitude of warming is much greater than that of cooling,<br />

resulting in warmer and drier conditions (Zhang et. al., 1996; Oglesby et al., 2010). But these<br />

impacts are further modulated or enhanced by the dominant circulation patterns and<br />

moisture sources of the considered region. For example the change in precipitation due to<br />

the decrease in evapotranspiration would be more dramatic in a region such as the Amazon<br />

basin where 50% of the moisture available for precipitation comes local evapotranspiration<br />

(Lean and Warrilow, 1989). But if the region is close to a water body such as an ocean or a<br />

lake and the local and/or regional circulations are favorable for moisture transport, the<br />

contribution from local evapotranspiration would not be as significant. Most coastal regions<br />

receive abundant moisture from the ocean, carried inland by onshore flow (i.e. sea breeze –<br />

local circulation) contributing to precipitation. This mechanism alone is not strong enough<br />

for moisture to be transported to inland regions far from the oceans. But a large scale<br />

circulation pattern such as the Asian monsoon can penetrate further inland supplying<br />

moisture to continental regions thus making the impact of reduced evapotranspiration on<br />

precipitation much smaller.<br />

5


6<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

This study focused on South Asia, Southeast Asia and Sri Lanka, all regions where the Asian<br />

monsoon plays an important role, and all regions where deforestation is currently or<br />

potentially a major issue. In these regions, the monsoon flow brings moisture from the ocean<br />

over land and this together with moisture provided by evapotranspiration produce<br />

abundant rainfall. The wet season is mostly during the summer monsoon period, but some<br />

areas experience rainfall during the winter monsoon as well. Any changes in this established<br />

pattern of rainfall and associated climate could have devastating consequences as this is a<br />

heavily populated area where agriculture is of great importance.<br />

The Hadley cell is one of the prominent features that make up the global circulation. The<br />

Hadley cell consists of two asymmetric cells extending between approximately 15 o in the<br />

summer hemisphere and 30 o in the winter hemisphere (Lu et al. 2007). This circulation is<br />

defined by a branch of rising air over the surface low pressure belt (Inter-Tropical<br />

Convergence Zone- ITCZ) in the tropics, a poleward flow in both hemispheres in the upper<br />

troposphere, a branch of subsiding air in the subtropics and equator-ward flow (in both<br />

hemispheres) at the surface that converges at the ITCZ (Mitas et al., 2005). This circulation<br />

transports both energy and angular momentum and gives rise to many of the climatic<br />

regions that are present today. For example regions that fall under the ITCZ receive<br />

abundant rainfall due to the strong convection associated with the rising branch of the<br />

Hadley cell and either receive rainfall throughout the year or have well defined wet/dry<br />

seasons. The subtropical deserts are in the regions where the subsiding branches of the<br />

Hadley cell are found as the sinking of air prevents the formation of clouds and hence<br />

precipitation. Any changes in the strength or the extension of the Hadley cell will therefore<br />

impact the climate within the region and have the ability to change the geographical<br />

boundaries of these climate zones. As the location of Southeast Asia is closely associated<br />

with the rising branch of the Hadley cell and the poleward transport of energy,<br />

deforestation can have consequences on both regional and global scales.<br />

It is evident that tropical deforestation can have an impact on the climate by modifying the<br />

magnitudes and the spatial and the temporal patterns of temperature and precipitation,<br />

creating warmer and drier climatic conditions in most regions. These changes might then be<br />

modulated or enhanced by the dominant circulation patterns such as the Asian monsoon<br />

leading to additional changes in the climate. The local moisture sources of the considered<br />

region may also play a significant role in modifying the climatic effects of deforestation<br />

Therefore, it is important to understand the possible consequences of deforestation and the<br />

mechanisms by which the change in land cover can alter the monsoonal climate.<br />

2. Methods<br />

In order to understand the impacts of tropical deforestation on the climate in South and<br />

Southeast Asia, a widely-used regional climate model (WRF – Weather Research and<br />

Forecasting Model) was employed. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model is a<br />

next generation mesoscale numerical weather prediction system that has been developed as<br />

a collaborative effort by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), the<br />

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (the National Centers for <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Prediction (NCEP) and the Forecast Systems Laboratory (FSL), the Air Force Weather<br />

Agency (AFWA), the Naval Research Laboratory, the University of Oklahoma, and the


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). WRF can be used in a wide scope of spatial scales<br />

ranging from a few meters to thousands of kilometers and is suitable for both operational<br />

forecasting and atmospheric research (Skamarock et al., 2008; http://www.wrfmodel.org/index.php).<br />

The main focus of this study was to identify the impacts of deforestation on the monsoonal<br />

climate in South and Southeast Asia. Therefore a Regional Climate Model (RCM) was used<br />

for this study instead of a Global Circulation Model (GCM), so that it was possible to run the<br />

model at a high resolution. This allowed the model to include the regional features and<br />

predict the regional climate with more accuracy. The GCM which usually has a horizontal<br />

resolution of 100 – 250 km (McGuffie and Henderson-Sellers, 2005). can capture the features<br />

of large and synoptic scale atmospheric circulation, but is too coarse to include small scale<br />

features such as the effects of topography or land surface effects to simulate the climate on a<br />

regional scale accurately (Denis et al., 2002). Since GCM simulations are done for the entire<br />

globe it is not feasible to run it at very high resolution due to limitations in computing<br />

power. Therefore regional climate models (RCM) are used to study regional climate<br />

changes. The main difference is a RCM is focused on the region of interest and has a much<br />

higher resolution. For example WRF simulations can be done at a resolution of 4 km which<br />

allows many small scale features such as mountains, coastlines and, importantly for our<br />

purposes, land-use categories to be represented more accurately.<br />

The model was forced at the lateral boundaries by NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data (NNRP) 1 .<br />

Since the model is a regional model the simulations are done for a restricted region.<br />

Therefore, conditions at the boundaries of the specified domain need to be provided so that<br />

the model can properly simulate the climate within the domain. Reanalysis data is used to<br />

provide these boundary conditions as observations alone are not sufficient to describe the<br />

full state of the atmosphere due to missing or spatially non-uniform data. Reanalysis data<br />

solves this problem by combining actual observations with a global model of the<br />

atmosphere to produce a comprehensive data set that serves as a proxy for real<br />

observations, thus providing better boundary conditions for the regional model.<br />

The model simulations focused on three specific domains: 1. South Asia (Southern <strong>India</strong> and<br />

Sri Lanka with a resolution of 12 km), 2. Southeast Asia (with a resolution of 12 km), 3. High<br />

resolution focus on Sri Lanka (with a resolution of 4 km). The WRF simulations were done<br />

for the years 1988, 1991 and 1993. These years represent a strong, weak and normal<br />

monsoon year with respect to South Asia. For each of these three years, a control run as well<br />

as two idealized runs (completely deforested and forested situations) were carried out and<br />

analyzed. The control runs are also compared to actual observations in order to identify<br />

model strengths and weaknesses, as well as any biases. In the deforested run all the land use<br />

categories (other than inland water) were replaced with grassland, which has a higher<br />

albedo than the tropical forests, but much less capability at extracting water from the soil. In<br />

the forested run evergreen broadleaf forest was used. These land-use changes, while<br />

extreme, provided the maximum possible range of impacts due to deforestation.<br />

1The data for this study are from the Research Data Archive (RDA) which is maintained by the<br />

Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL) at the National Center for Atmospheric<br />

Research (NCAR). NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The original data are<br />

available from the RDA (http://dss.ucar.edu) in dataset number ds090.2.<br />

7


8<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

In a WRF simulation each grid point has a land-use category (grassland, cropland,<br />

evergreen broadleaf forest, water etc.) assigned to it based on the land-use data set being<br />

used for the model run. The properties (surface albedo, surface emissivity, moisture<br />

availability, surface roughness length) of each land-use category depend on the land surface<br />

model used in the WRF run. The land surface model is the component that takes care of the<br />

processes involving land-surface interactions. For the WRF runs, the 5-layer thermal<br />

diffusion scheme was selected as the land surface model. USGS (winter) data set was used<br />

to specify land-use categories and their properties. To simulate deforested conditions, all the<br />

land-use categories other than water were replaced with grassland. Grassland has a higher<br />

albedo (23%) than most other land-use types and therefore absorbs less energy. The<br />

specified moisture capacity (0.30) is, however, also low. Water bodies have the lowest<br />

surface albedo (8%) and a specified moisture availability of 1.0 (saturated surface). Forested<br />

conditions were simulated by replacing all land-use categories other than water by<br />

evergreen broadleaf forest which has a very low surface albedo (12%), but much higher<br />

moisture availability (0.5) compared to grassland, with the former allowing the surface to<br />

absorb more incoming energy and the latter supporting larger evaporation amounts.<br />

Before analyzing the results of the WRF simulations it is important to understand the<br />

possible impacts of the land-use changes made to the deforested and deforested runs (as<br />

mentioned above), on the surface energy and the moisture budgets and how the changes<br />

will ultimately affect the regional climate.<br />

Tropical forests have a low surface albedo throughout the year. This allows the forests to<br />

absorb a large part of the incoming radiation. Most land-use categories have surface albedos<br />

that are higher than that of a tropical rainforest. Therefore tropical deforestation leads to an<br />

increase in the surface albedo, allowing the surface to reflect more radiation. As a result the<br />

surface absorbs less radiation creating a cooling effect. This also reduces the amount of<br />

energy available for evapotranspiration.<br />

On the other hand, the trees found in tropical forests have the capacity to draw water from<br />

the soil and thereby add a large amount of moisture to the atmosphere via transpiration.<br />

The large leaf and stem area allows the trees to intercept a significant amount of the rainfall.<br />

The intercepted water is then evaporated into the atmosphere. Evapotranspiration can be an<br />

important moisture source for local precipitation, especially in regions that are not in the<br />

proximity of a water body. Also evapotranspiration helps to lower the surface temperature.<br />

Deforestation leads to a decrease in evapotranspiration. This removes or reduces the<br />

capacity of the local moisture source and the cooling effect of evapotranspiration. This also<br />

alters the energy partitioning between latent and sensible heat fluxes at the surface. Due to<br />

the reduction in evapotranspiration and hence the latent energy flux, the energy transfer<br />

between the surface and the atmosphere would be achieved mostly through the exchange of<br />

sensible heat. As this is a less efficient method of heat transfer (compared to the cooling by<br />

latent heat transfer), this would lead to an increase in the surface temperature. The<br />

reduction in the latent energy flux means the energy available for convection is reduced.<br />

This can potentially lead to a weakening of the local circulation that in turn can have a<br />

negative impact on the moisture convergence in the area. The reduction of moisture<br />

convergence and evapotranspiration result in a reduction in precipitation. Therefore the<br />

reduction in evapotranspiration can result in a warming of the surface and a decrease in<br />

precipitation. The decrease in precipitation then acts as a positive feedback to further reduce


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

the evapotranspiration and enhance the warming effect. Thus, deforestation will result in a<br />

warmer and drier climate.<br />

The surface energy and the moisture budgets were analyzed to see if the possible changes<br />

that are discussed above were present in the WRF output. Temperature, precipitation and<br />

evaporation anomalies (deforested – forested) were also calculated to identify the climatic<br />

impact of deforestation.<br />

3. Results<br />

In response to deforestation, for all three years, there is an increase in temperature over<br />

majority of the land areas whereas the changes over the oceans are more variable. Figure I<br />

show the changes in temperature (at 2 m) between the deforested and the forested runs for<br />

the year 1988. (For brevity, we show changes for one representative year.) Changes in the<br />

magnitudes in the spatial patterns of both the annual and the seasonal (JJA) temperatures<br />

are shown in the figure. The period of June, July and August (JJA) was selected to focus on<br />

the height of the summer monsoon season. Most regions show a clear warming, evident in<br />

both the annual and the seasonal values. The most prominent warming is seen along the<br />

west coast of <strong>India</strong> and Sri Lanka. There is a small region in the central highlands of Sri<br />

Lanka where the response is a cooling of temperature. Figure II shows the time series of<br />

temperature over land areas for 1988. The warming is evident in the monthly temperatures<br />

in all of the domains. The temperature at 2 m (for 1988) for the deforested and the forested<br />

situations and the corresponding changes are shown in table II.<br />

The spatial pattern of precipitation over each of the three years shows a decrease over land<br />

whereas some regions over the oceans experience enhanced rainfall. The annual<br />

precipitation values show a larger reduction than just the values in the monsoon season.<br />

This indicates that while the amount of precipitation received during the summer monsoon<br />

is affected by deforestation so are the other mechanisms such as the winter monsoon and<br />

convection that provide rainfall during the rest of the year. Figure III shows the<br />

precipitation anomalies between the deforested and the forested simulations for the<br />

representative year 1988. Also the increase in Bowen ratio (over land) indicates that<br />

conditions become drier. The annual precipitation (for 1988) over South Asia decreases by<br />

19% while the reduction over Sri Lanka is only 10% relative to the forested run. Southeast<br />

Asia experiences a 53% decrease in precipitation as a result of deforestation (All the percent<br />

changes provided in this chapter are calculated as the difference between the deforested and<br />

forested runs with respect to the forested run. i.e. [(D-F)/F]*100%).<br />

Evaporation over land is much smaller after deforestation but the changes over the ocean in<br />

the domains over South Asia and Sri Lanka show an increase. (The increase over the ocean<br />

is likely due to the warmer temperatures due to deforestation. The amount of water vapor<br />

the atmosphere can hold strongly depends on the temperature with warm air being able to<br />

hold more moisture than cold air. As deforestation warms the atmosphere, the air over the<br />

adjacent ocean also warms, gaining the ability to hold more moisture. This implies that more<br />

evaporation can take place before the air is saturated thus enhancing evaporation over the<br />

ocean.) Overall, the annual evapotranspiration over all three domains is reduced. This can<br />

be seen in figure IV which shows the anomalies in evapotranspiration for 1988. The largest<br />

decrease is seen over Sri Lanka where the (area averaged) annual evaporation decreases by<br />

9


10<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

465 mm (table I), which is 29% reduction compared to the forested run, over the year. The<br />

annual evapotranspiration over South Asia decreases by 420 mm (27%) whereas the<br />

decrease over Southeast Asia is 415 mm (25%). The reduction in evapotranspiration is a<br />

result of the lower transpiration, reduced interception of precipitation (due to reduced leaf<br />

and stem area) and smaller roughness length. The roughness length provides a measure of<br />

the surface friction and the exchange of moisture between the atmosphere and the surface,<br />

with smaller roughness lengths modulating the exchange.<br />

The latent heat flux shows a decrease over all domains, consistent with the reduction in<br />

evaporation. As moisture becomes limited with the change in land-use, less energy is used<br />

for evapotranspiration. This means the evaporative cooling at the surface is reduced and the<br />

remaining energy goes into warming the surface. The sensible heat flux, which heats the air<br />

in contact with the surface, shows an increase due to the change in energy partitioning at the<br />

surface (i.e. in response to the decrease in latent energy flux). The changes in evaporation,<br />

latent heat flux and sensible heat flux support the warming observed in response to<br />

deforestation.<br />

Precipitation is greater than the evapotranspiration over South Asia and Sri Lanka. This<br />

indicates that the moisture provided from a moisture source (i.e. moisture transported from<br />

the <strong>India</strong>n Ocean into the area by the regional circulation) other than local<br />

evapotranspiration makes a significant contribution to the precipitation in the region,<br />

suggesting that the <strong>India</strong>n monsoon plays a dominant role where precipitation is<br />

considered. Out of the two regions the moisture transport is more significant for Sri Lanka<br />

as precipitation over the region can be more than twice the amount of the local<br />

evapotranspiration.<br />

The decrease in precipitation is much larger than that of evapotranspiration over Sri Lanka.<br />

The decrease in the local moisture recycling capacity alone cannot explain this strong<br />

reduction in precipitation. This indicates the moisture transported into the region has<br />

decreased, signaling a weakening or a change in the regional circulation leading to a<br />

reduced atmospheric moisture convergence into the area. This shows that while the<br />

moisture brought in with the monsoon flow may be a prominent factor in determining the<br />

amount of precipitation, deforestation can apparently weaken the moisture flux so that less<br />

water is available for precipitation in the region.<br />

On the other hand, the reduction in precipitation over South Asia is less than that of<br />

evaporation. This indicates a stronger moisture convergence over the <strong>India</strong>n subcontinent.<br />

As a result deforestation causes two competing effects on precipitation. The decrease in<br />

evapotranspiration has a negative impact on precipitation whereas the increased moisture<br />

convergence has a positive effect on it. But the magnitude of the latter is smaller than that of<br />

the evapotranspiration, therefore ultimately resulting in a decrease in precipitation.<br />

The difference between precipitation and evapotranspiration is also a measure of surface<br />

runoff and storage. The changes in surface runoff can be very important for streamflow in<br />

the region. But further analysis of these terms are not possible because the land surface<br />

model used in the WRF runs does not have the capability to compute these terms separately.<br />

Clouds reflect part of the incoming solar radiation back out to space, hence the amount of<br />

incoming shortwave radiation at the surface can be used as a proxy for cloud cover. The<br />

incoming shortwave radiation shows a reduction for all three years over all domains. This is<br />

a indication of reduced cloud cover. The decrease in evaporation (and hence latent heat flux)<br />

means that there is less moisture.


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

Table 1. The terms of the surface energy and the moisture budgets for deforested (D) and<br />

forested (F) WRF simulations as well as the difference between the two simulations (D-F)<br />

over South Asia, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia . These are the areas averaged values for<br />

1988 and are computed only over land areas. Precipitation and evaporation are yearly totals.<br />

The units are Wm -2 unless noted otherwise in the table. The Bowen ratio is unitless. Here<br />

SW – shortwave radiation, LW – longwave radiation, Rnet – net radiation, LE – latent energy<br />

flux, SH – sensible heat flux, GE – storage, P – precipitation, E – evaporation. The subscripts<br />

(up/down) give the direction of the radiation. SWnet and LWnet are calculated as the<br />

difference between downward and upward radiation. A positive net radiation value<br />

indicates that the radiation is aimed towards the surface (downwards).<br />

11


12<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Table 2. The area averaged annual temperature at 2 m and surface skin temperature (surface<br />

temperature) are shown here. Temperature values are in Kelvins (K). Surface emissivity and<br />

surface albedo for both deforested and forested simulation are included here. All the values<br />

in the table are for 1988


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

Fig. 1. The annual and the seasonal (June, July and August) temperature anomalies (i.e.<br />

deforest –forest) for South Asia (a,d), Sri Lanka (b,e) and Southeast Asia (c,f) for 1988.<br />

Temperature is the surface air temperature 2m above the surface and is expressed in Kelvins<br />

(K) with a contour interval of 0.25 K.<br />

13


14<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 2. The time series of temperature for 1988. The monthly temperature values over land<br />

regions (excluding oceans) for South Asia (a), Sri Lanka (b) and Southeast Asia (c) are shown<br />

here. Temperature is the air temperature 2m above the surface and is measured in Kelvin (K)


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

Fig. 3. The total annual and the seasonal (June, July and August) precipitation anomalies (i.e<br />

deforest –forest) for South Asia (a,d), Sri Lanka (b,e) and Southeast Asia (c,f) for 1988.<br />

Precipitation is in millimeters (mm) with a contour interval of 100 mm.<br />

15


16<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 4. The annual and the seasonal (June, July and August) evaporation anomalies (i.e<br />

deforest –forest) for South Asia (a,d), Sri Lanka (b,e) and Southeast Asia (c,f) for 1988.<br />

Evaporation is in millimeters (mm) with a contour interval of 200 mm for annual plot and 50<br />

mm for the seasonal plot.


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

4. Discussion<br />

Deforestation leads to warmer and drier climatic conditions. As a result of deforestation less<br />

moisture is available at the land surface, leading to a reduction in evapotranspiration. This<br />

in turn leads to an increase in temperature and a decrease in precipitation over land. These<br />

changes then work together to alter the moisture convergence in the region. These changes<br />

are seen not only during the monsoon season but through the entire year.<br />

The monsoon is primarily driven by the pressure gradient created by the differential heating<br />

of the ocean and land. Land regions especially the Tibetan plateau warms up more than the<br />

<strong>India</strong>n Ocean during the summer due to the small heat capacity of land. This creates a<br />

thermal low pressure over land and the resulting pressure gradient between ocean and land<br />

initiates the monsoon flow. Subsequently, the monsoon is sustained by the release of latent<br />

heat into the atmosphere. Therefore warmer temperatures should intensify the monsoon,<br />

increasing precipitation over land. But this is not seen in the results. The reasons for this are<br />

regionally specific. Over Sri Lanka it is likely that the warming of the land itself is reducing<br />

the amount of precipitation. The initial step in the formation of precipitation is the rising of<br />

parcels of warm moist air. The air being warm and moist by itself is not sufficient to cause<br />

rising motion. For air to rise the density of a parcel of air has to be lower than that of the<br />

surrounding air, that is the parcel temperature must be warmer than that of the surrounding<br />

(cooler) air. When deforestation warms the air over land, it reduces this difference, creating<br />

a more stable atmosphere which inhibits the rising of air and hence also weakens the<br />

atmospheric moisture convergence. Therefore even if the atmosphere otherwise holds<br />

plenty of moisture this process reduces the amount of precipitation that can form. Therefore<br />

the weakened moisture convergence together with the reduced evaporation causes the<br />

reduction in precipitation. The conditions are different in the <strong>India</strong>n subcontinent where the<br />

summer monsoon is at its’ strongest. The warming of the land region now results in a<br />

stronger moisture convergence indicating the possibility that the monsoon might become<br />

stronger over the region. It is possible that the warming over the <strong>India</strong>n subcontinent (which<br />

has a smaller magnitude than the warming in Sri Lanka) is insufficient to stabilize the<br />

atmosphere. But as discussed in the results section the reduced evapotranspiration at any<br />

rate plays the dominant role in reducing the annual and the seasonal precipitation.<br />

The changes in the climatic conditions due to deforestation can have a strong impact on<br />

society. Warmer and drier conditions can have far reaching consequences in many different<br />

ways. The elevated temperatures alone can cause life loss especially if the number of heat<br />

waves increases. <strong>India</strong> would be more susceptible to this as parts of the country experience<br />

high summer temperatures prior to the onset of the monsoon, a time during which people<br />

are vulnerable to the excess heat. The warm temperatures can also kill livestock and destroy<br />

stored goods.<br />

The reduction in precipitation in combination with the warmer temperature can have a<br />

negative impact on agriculture in the region. These climatic changes can result in reduced<br />

crop yields, a shift in the life cycle of the crop and change the length of the growing season<br />

and the timing of the harvest. Also the regions that are the best suited for growing crops<br />

may migrate. As the warm and dry conditions act as positive feedbacks, deforestation can<br />

lead to persistent droughts. This may then result in desertification making some regions no<br />

longer viable as agricultural land and marginally habitable regions unsuitable for living. In<br />

17


18<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

addition to this the changes in temperature and precipitation may change the habitats of<br />

animals and expand or alter the spread of diseases such as malaria.<br />

Some regions depend largely on rainfall and/or stream flow for drinking water. If the<br />

decrease in precipitation is large enough, the lack of access to clean drinking water can<br />

become a major problem. In addition to this the water level in the rivers are important for<br />

transport along the rivers, generation of hydropower and irrigation of crops. If the regions<br />

that feed the river flow experience a decrease in precipitation it would lower the water<br />

levels regardless of what happens downstream causing many economic problems.<br />

All these changes would lead to a shortage in food and a disruption in the well established<br />

livelihoods in the region leading to poverty and famine in extreme cases. They would also<br />

cause many health and safety issues to which the very young, the old and the poor would be<br />

the most sensitive.<br />

Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia has an impact on the monsoonal climate. These<br />

climatic impacts then in turn will cause social, economical, environmental and health<br />

problems in the region. It is important to notice that Southeast Asia still has a significant<br />

amount of forest whereas the situation in south Asia is closer to the conditions of the<br />

deforested simulations. Therefore it is imperative to set in place, policies that would prevent<br />

or slow down deforestation in the region as well as to implement steps to deal with issues<br />

that have already arisen due to deforestation.<br />

This study illustrates the maximum possible range of changes possible due to deforestation<br />

and shows that the signal due to deforestation can override even a strong monsoon.<br />

Therefore it is worthwhile to continue this study, focused on more realistic land-use changes<br />

and to examine the magnitude of the changes. Also future studies would include the<br />

changes to the Hadley cell and the occurrence of extreme events, especially floods, under<br />

both realistic and idealized situations.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

Deforestation impacts the climate by modifying surface energy and moisture budgets. These<br />

modifications are mostly due to the decrease in evapotranspiration and increase in the<br />

surface albedo. The changes in surface albedo and evapotranspiration have competing<br />

effects on the temperature, but as seen from the results of the WRF runs the warming effect<br />

due to the reduced evapotranspiration dominates over the cooling effects of the reduced<br />

albedo.<br />

Results show that majority of the land areas would become warmer and drier in response to<br />

deforestation, with precipitation, evapotranspiration and cloud cover all showing a<br />

decrease. Atmospheric moisture convergence shows regionally specific changes. These<br />

changes are seen in both the annual and monsoon seasonal values, suggesting that the<br />

changes that take place due to deforestation have the ability to override even a strong<br />

monsoon signal. The changes over the oceans are more variable, with an increase in<br />

evaporation seen in both seasonal and annual values in the domains over South Asia and Sri<br />

Lanka.<br />

These changes due to deforestation can have far reaching social, economic and<br />

environmental impacts as well as cause serious health issues. Warm temperatures can cause<br />

illness and even heat related deaths. The decrease in precipitation can lead to the drying of


The Climatic Effects of Deforestation in South and Southeast Asia<br />

natural springs and reduced stream flow, cutting of access to clean drinking water in some<br />

regions. The habitats of plants and animals can change resulting in spread of diseases.<br />

Further the warm dry conditions can reduce or destroy crops, kill livestock and decrease the<br />

output from hydro powered electricity plants.<br />

The climatic changes due to deforestation have the very real potential to impact the<br />

economic and the social structures of a country. As deforestation has been an ongoing<br />

problem, a climatic signal may already be present and the consequences of the changes<br />

already affecting us to some extent. If such a signal is present further deforestation may<br />

amplify these changes to a level that they would be clearly evident. Therefore it is important<br />

to understand the impacts of human activity on the climate, and set in place policies not<br />

only regarding deforestation but also implement steps to understand and deal with the<br />

consequences of a climatic signal that can result from current land-use practices.<br />

6. References<br />

Clark D. B., Xue Y., Harding R. J. & Valdes P.J. (2001). “Modeling the impact of land surface<br />

degradation on the climate of tropical north Africa”. Journal of Climate, vol 14<br />

1809-1822<br />

Denis B., Laprise R., Caya D. & Côté J. (2002). “Downscaling ability of one-way nested<br />

regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment”. Climate Dynamics 18:627-<br />

646<br />

Foley J. A., DeFries R., Asner G. P., et al., (2005). “Global consequences of land use”. Science,<br />

309, 570-574.<br />

Gibbard S.G., Caldeira K., Bala G., Phillips J.J. & Wickett M., (2005). “Climate effects of globa<br />

land cover change”. Geophysical research letter.<br />

Hasler, N. & Avissar R. (2007). "What controls evapotranspiration in the amazon basin?"<br />

Journal of Hydrometeorology 8(3): 380-395.<br />

Kanae S., Oki T. & Musiake K. (2001). “Impacts of deforestation on regional precipitation<br />

over the Indochina peninsula”. Journal of Hydroclimatology, vol 2 51-70<br />

Lean J. & Warrilow D.A. (1989). “Simulation of the regional climatic impact of Amazon<br />

deforestation”. Nature 342: 411-413<br />

Lu J., Vecchi G. A. & Reichler T., (2007). “Expansion of the Hadley cell under global<br />

warming”. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 34<br />

McGuffie K. & Henderson-Sellers A. (2005). A climate modeling primer (third edition). John<br />

Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 9780470857502<br />

Mitas C. M. & Clement A., (2005). “Has the Hadley cell been strengthening in recent<br />

decades?”. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 32<br />

Nobre C.A., Sellers P.J. & Shukla J., (1991). “Amazonian deforestation and regional climate<br />

Change”. Journal of Climate vol 4: 957-988<br />

Oglesby R. J., Sever T. L., Saturno W., D. J. Erickson, III & Srikishen J. (2010), “Collapse of<br />

the Maya: Could deforestation have contributed?”, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D12106,<br />

doi:10.1029/2009JD011942.<br />

Skamarock W.C., Klemp J.B., Dudhia J., Gill D.O., Barker D.M., Duda M.G., Huang Xiang-<br />

Yu, Wang W. & Powers J.G., (2008) “A Description of the Advanced Research WRF<br />

Version 3”<br />

19


20<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Suh M. S., & Lee D. K. (2004). “ Impacts of land use/cover changes on Surface climate over<br />

east Asia for extreme climate cases using RegCM2”. J. Geophy. Res.,109<br />

Zeng N. & Neelin J. D., (1999). “A land-atmosphere interaction theory for the tropical<br />

deforestation problem”. Journal of Climate Vol12: 857-872<br />

Zhang H. & Henderson-Sellers A. (1996). “Impacts of tropical deforestation. Part 1: Process<br />

analysis of local climatic change”. Journal of Climate vol19: 1497-1517


1. Introduction<br />

Impacts of Deforestation on Climate<br />

and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

2<br />

Ranyére Silva Nóbrega<br />

University Federal of Pernambuco<br />

Brazil<br />

The Amazon importance in several areas of research demonstrates how the region affects<br />

the balance of South America and, depending on the scale used, on the planet. The<br />

biodiversity, mineral wealth, water resources wealth, carbon sequestration, transport of<br />

energy in the atmosphere are examples of important aspects of the region. Another<br />

important phenomenon that occurs in the Amazon are the energy flows between soilvegetation-atmosphere<br />

dynamics that affect the climate, water resources and the advection<br />

of moisture to the surrounding parts.<br />

Deforestation is the major environmental problem in the Amazon River basin nowadays,<br />

and its impacts affect both the local and global scale. In fact, this region is responsible for<br />

approximately 13% of all global runoff into the oceans (Foley et al., 2002) and its abundant<br />

vegetation releases large amounts of water vapor through evapotranspiration leading to a<br />

recycling in precipitation of about 25-35% (Brubaker et al, 1993; Eltahir and Bras, 1994;<br />

Trenberth, 1999).<br />

Rondonia State, located in Western Amazon, already has a large area of vegetation changed<br />

by deforestation. Historically, there were tax incentives and government so that there was<br />

an expansion of development. Today the concern with changes in environmental balance of<br />

the Amazon basin, Rondônia, is justified by the increasing pressure on various forms of<br />

exploitation of the region, for example, timber extraction and agricultural expansion, the<br />

construction of hydropower, exploitation of biological and mineral riches.<br />

Krusche et al. (2005) suggest the following reasons for this progress: between 1970 and 1990<br />

there was a surge in state occupancy with settlers coming from other regions, extensive<br />

cattle ranching became the main economic activity and the state ground most is old and<br />

weathered, with the exception of some basins, promoting agriculture in an appropriate area.<br />

According to the authors, the pattern of occupancy was observed of the "fishbone"<br />

associated with the opening of roads.<br />

The highway BR-364construction, responsible for turning the region with the rest of the<br />

country, was one of the factors that triggered large projects of colonization / occupation.<br />

Earlier this deforestation process was seen as boon, as a prerequisite for applying for tenure<br />

and subsequent legalization of land (Santos, 2001). Fearnside (2007) assert that the main<br />

aspect of change in land use / land cover in region is deforestation, and that it has grown<br />

over the years.


22<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Deforestation rates of the State during the period 1988 to 2007 followed, in general, the same<br />

degradation that deforestation in the Amazon, since it has to be estimated. The most<br />

relevant peaks occurred in 1994 and 2004, showing a slight decrease for the years 2005 to<br />

2007, however, leaving the state responsible for a higher percentage than the last 10 years<br />

earlier, reflecting a greater intensity on change in coverage plant that closed in the rest of the<br />

Amazon.<br />

Year<br />

Deforestation (km2)<br />

Rondönia Amazon<br />

1988 2340 21050 11.10<br />

1989 1430 17770 8.00<br />

1990 1670 13730 12.20<br />

1991 1110 11030 10.10<br />

1992 2265 13786 16.40<br />

1993 2595 14896 17.40<br />

1994 2595 14896 17.40<br />

1995 4730 29059 16.30<br />

1996 2432 18161 13.40<br />

1997 1986 13227 15.00<br />

1998 2041 17383 11.70<br />

1999 2358 17259 13.70<br />

2000 2465 18226 13.50<br />

2001 2673 18165 14.70<br />

2002 3067 21651 14.50<br />

2003 3620 25396 14.40<br />

2004 3834 27772 14.00<br />

2005 3233 19014 17.00<br />

2006 2062 14286 14.70<br />

2007 1611 11651 13.82<br />

2008 1136 12911 10.00<br />

2009 482 7464 6.45%<br />

2010 427 6451 6.6%<br />

Table 1. Annual deforestation rates - Amazon and Rondônia (Source data: Prodes, Inpe)<br />

Public policies has been working to combat deforestation across the Amazon, we can<br />

observe the decrease in the rate since 2007, however, has been observed that in conservation<br />

areas this rate is increasing.<br />

The proposal chapter is investigating the impacts that deforestation and climate change can<br />

lead on hydrological cycle in the region, as well as the feedback system of climate and<br />

hydrological cycle.<br />

%


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

2. Metodology<br />

The study is centered in Rondônia state, whose area of about 234.000 km2. The state's<br />

network runoff is represented by Madeira river (an important tributary of the Amazonian<br />

river basin) and its streams that form eight important sub river basins, among them, it is the<br />

Jamari sub river basin (Fig. 1). About 28% of the Rondônia state have already been<br />

deforested, because of this, is used as the test catchment study.<br />

The Jamari river basin has suffered a substantial deforestation due to the advance of the<br />

agricultural frontier in the Rondônia state. The basin is crossed by two important rivers<br />

namely Jamari and Candeias. Jamari river has its nascent in the southwest part of “Serra do<br />

Pacaás Novos”, in Rondônia, and streams northward flowing into the right bank of Madeira<br />

river, whose river basin is defined by the geographical coordinates 08º 28'S to 11º 07'S of<br />

latitude and 62º 36'W to 64º 20'W of longitude with about 29.066.68 km² of area.<br />

The semi-distributed hydrological model SLURP with more detailed input parametric<br />

information will be used in this research in order to investigate the impacts caused by<br />

deforestation as well as climate changes on hydrological processes in Jamari River basin.<br />

Realistic and extremes scenarios of deforestation will be analyzed, and also scenarios of<br />

temperature rise and precipitation increase/decrease.<br />

Fig. 1. Localization and drainage network Jamari sub river basin.<br />

23


24<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

2.1 Hydrological model<br />

Semi-distributed Land Use-based Runoff Processes - SLURP is a basin model that simulates<br />

the hydrological cycle from precipitation to runoff including the effects of reservoirs,<br />

regulators and water extractions (Kite, 2005). First divides a basin into sub-basins using<br />

topography from a digital elevation map. These sub-basins are further divided into areas of<br />

different land covers using data from a digital land cover classification. Each land cover<br />

class has a distinct set of parameters for the model.<br />

This model uses basically three types of data: i) digital elevation data (DEM); ii) land cover<br />

data; and iii) climatic data. The matrix data of both DEM and land cover data must have the<br />

same dimension. Climatic data should contain: precipitation, air temperature, dew-point<br />

temperature (or relative humidity), solar radiation and wind intensity. Firstly, it divides a<br />

hydrological basin into sub-river basins and then divides each sub-river basin into land<br />

cover components using the public-domain topographic analysis software TOPAZ (and<br />

Martz and Garbreht, 1999). These homogeneous areas are based on the hydrological<br />

response unit (HRU) concept described by Kite (2005). SLURP defines these areas as<br />

Aggregated Simulation Areas (ASA).<br />

The model has been applied in many countries for small hectares basins (Su et al., 2000) to<br />

large basins such as Mackenzie (Kite et al., 1994) and it was developed to make maximum<br />

use of remote sensing data. Applications of the model includes studies of climate change<br />

(Kite, 1993), hydropower (Kite et al., 1998), water productivity (Kite, 2005), irrigation (Kite<br />

and Droogers, 1999) and wildlife refuges (de Voogt et al., 1999), contribution of snowmelt to<br />

runoff (Laurente and Valeo, 2003; Thorne and Woo, 2006), and large mountainous<br />

catchment (Thorne and Woo, 2006). However, the SLURP model was not used in the<br />

Amazon, and its conceptual approach allows its use in regions with little data, as well as the<br />

possibility and direct use of remote sensing data which allows to retrieve physical<br />

parameters with good accuracy, even in basins with small slopes, as found in some subbasins<br />

in the Amazon River.<br />

2.2 Data<br />

Digital Elevation Model - DEM from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) with<br />

90-m resolution horizontal was used to obtain topography. In order to correct failures, it was<br />

used the technique of space filtering, interactive filling.<br />

For actual land cover data it was used seven images of Landsat 7 scenes 2007 over the<br />

Jamari sub-river basin, resolution of 30m, provided by Amazonian Protection System<br />

(SIPAM). Firstly, the scenes were georeferenced and then a mosaic was composed. Secondly,<br />

NDVI performed a supervised classification to obtain the land-cover image. Then, the data<br />

was sampled again to 90m resolution, since the SLURP requires that the matrix of land<br />

cover has the same size of DEM. Finally, the data was classified into four classes: water,<br />

forest, non-forest and man-modified (urbanized). The non-forest class includes agricultural<br />

areas and the savannah.<br />

2.3 Climatic, rainfall and runoff data<br />

Climatic, rainfall and runoff data are some of the main difficulties in hydrometeorological<br />

modeling in the Amazon. The time series available is short and has many flaws. Was used<br />

data set from four stations with information about precipitation, air temperature and dew


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

point of the Agency for <strong>Environment</strong>al Development in Rondônia (SEDAM). We also use<br />

data from five rainfall gauge of the National Water Agency (ANA). The data sets are from<br />

the period between 1 January 1999 and December 31, 2007.<br />

2.4 Model performance evaluation criteria<br />

Model performance was evaluated by using four different error measures: Nash and<br />

Sutcliffe (NS), Percent BIAS (PBIAS), Daily Root Mean Square (DRMS) error criteria (Zhi et<br />

al., 2009; Moriasi et al., 2007), and Deviation Volume (D%) (Kite, 2005). The equations were<br />

given as showed below:<br />

n<br />

(Q Q )<br />

2<br />

<br />

i 1<br />

obs<br />

<br />

mod<br />

NS<br />

1 <br />

n<br />

(Q Q )<br />

2<br />

<br />

i 1<br />

obs<br />

<br />

<br />

obsd<br />

where Qobs and Qmod are the measured and modeled data, respectively; . Q obsd . is average<br />

modeled data; and n is the total number of data records. The coefficient can range from -∞ to<br />

1 and represents the amount of data oscillation that is explained by the model. The model is<br />

considered optimal if NS = 1, appropriate and good if NS > 0.75, acceptable if 0.36


26<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

volumes measured and simulated. A positive value indicates underestimation of the<br />

simulated volumes (losses in origin). A negative value indicates that the calculated average<br />

flow is high (losses in sinks) (Kite, 2005).<br />

3. Simulations<br />

Based on the percentage of deforestation in the basin obtained from the PRODES data (Table<br />

2) it was defined two trends scenarios: i) DEFOR+20, 20% more deforestation area, and ii)<br />

DEFOR+30, 30% deforestation area. It was defined three extreme scenarios of land cover for<br />

investigating the relationship between soil-cover change and runoff within SLURP model.<br />

The experiments are: i) 100%FOR, one hundred per cent with forest and water; ii)<br />

100%NOFOR, one hundred per cent with savannah plus pasture and water; and iii)<br />

100%MANMODIF, one hundred per cent man-modified area and water. For climatic<br />

impacts analysis has been used two scenarios. The scenarios were based in climate futures<br />

projections up to 2050 A2 HadCM3 model, discussed in Marengo (2006b). In both scenarios<br />

is assumed that the temperature rise 2 oC, and rainfall varies 20%, decreasing and increasing.<br />

The climate scenarios are: i) P+20, meaning 20% increase in rainfall, with an increase in<br />

temperature of 2 degrees, and ii) P-20, meaning 20% reduction in rainfall, with an increase in<br />

temperature of 2 degrees.<br />

SCENARIO DESCRIPTION<br />

DEFOR+20 20% more deforestation area<br />

DEFOR+30 30% more deforestation area<br />

100%FOR 100% forest area<br />

100%NOFOR 100% savannah plus pasture<br />

100%MANMODIF 100% man-modified area<br />

P+20 20% increase in rainfall, and 2oC temperature increase<br />

P-20 20% decrease in rainfall, and 2oC temperature increase<br />

Table 2. Simulations scenarios<br />

3.1 Problems identified – implementation of necessary remedial measures<br />

SLURP model needs data from weather stations which contains precipitation, temperature,<br />

humidity and wind. The average is calculated using the Thiessen polygons method for each<br />

ASA. If there is no such data, the model does not perform the simulation (for example, when<br />

there is rainfall data, but there is not temperature).<br />

In some countries, such as Brazil, it is common to have only rainfall station, instead of<br />

weather station, making the network rainfall much denser than the weather. But the<br />

compilation of the model does not allow the use of this data. Aiming to overcome this<br />

limitation, we tried to develop a methodology that would use the climatic stations without<br />

changing the source code of the model. Adopted method is based on the concept that the<br />

spatial variability of precipitation is less than the other data, such as temperature. Then,<br />

without the model, it was calculated the mean rainfall for each ASA also using the Thiessen<br />

method, but including the data from rainfall stations. After that, the files of average<br />

precipitation for each ASA were replaced.


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

4. Results and discussion<br />

Jamari sub-river basin was automatically divided by SLURP into five aggregate similar<br />

areas (ASAs) according to the DEM and land cover data (Fig. 2). For each ASA it was<br />

obtained the percentile area of land cover occupied for each of the four classes: i) water; ii)<br />

forest; iii) non-forest; and iv) man-modified (Table 3). The total basin area obtained by the<br />

model is 28.847 km 2 (~99% of the total area, according to Government State official data).<br />

The model was calibrated and checked by the two different types of data: i) weather stations<br />

data (OBS1); and ii) weather station data added rainfall gauge station (OBS2). Obviously it is<br />

expected that the use of a denser network of precipitation within a basin simulation results<br />

in improvements, since the data quality is consistent, but it was not clear if the model would<br />

accept the manual modification.<br />

Fig. 2. ASAs for Jamari sub river basin; X – weather stations; ● – rainfall station<br />

27


28<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

ASA Name Water Forest Non forest Man modified Total (km 2)<br />

ASA 01 9.0 63.0 7.8 20.2 3025.81<br />

ASA 02 3.6 67.3 11.7 17.4 5007.65<br />

ASA 03 9.3 61.3 7.0 22.4 9239.68<br />

ASA 04 3.9 62.2 11.4 22.5 10999.55<br />

ASA 05 4.1 93.8 2.0 0.1 573.94<br />

Table 3. Land coverage and total area for each ASA (%)<br />

The NS, RSR, PBIAS and D(%) for OBS2(OBS1) calibration period was 0.88(0.74), 0.31(0.45), -<br />

7%(-12%) and -0.94%(-10.1%), respectively. The NS, RSR, PBIAS and D(%) for OBS2(OBS1)<br />

validation period was 0.84(0.71), 0.34(0.48), -8%(-15%) and -13.4(-10.3). The verification of<br />

the model efficiency criteria indicates that the values are acceptable during both the<br />

calibration and validation period. (Table 3), but it is clear that the model did better with the<br />

inclusion of climatic stations. From this point, we used OBS2 data with SLURP climate<br />

input.<br />

4.1 Calibration and verification<br />

Model was calibrated and verified by the two different types of data: i) weather stations<br />

data (OBS1); and ii) weather station data added rainfall gauge station (OBS2). Obviously it is<br />

expected that the use of a denser network of precipitation within a basin simulation results<br />

in improvements, since the data quality is consistent, but it was not clear if the model would<br />

accept the manual modification.<br />

The NS, RSR, PBIAS and D(%) for OBS2(OBS1) calibration period was 0.88(0.74), 0.31(0.45), -<br />

7%(-12%) and -0.94%(-10.1%), respectively. The NS, RSR, PBIAS and D(%) for OBS2(OBS1)<br />

validation period was 0.84(0.71), 0.34(0.48), -8%(-15%) and -13.4(-10.3). Model efficiency<br />

criteria verification indicates that the values are acceptable during both the calibration and<br />

validation period (Table 4), but it is clear that the model did better with the inclusion of<br />

climatic stations, therefore, used OBS2 data with climate input.<br />

OBS2 (OBS1) NS RSR PBIAS D(%)<br />

Calibration 0.88 (0.74) 0.31(0.45) -7%(-12%) -0.94 (-10.1)<br />

Verification 0.84 (0.71) 0.34(0.48) -8% (-15%) -13.4 (-10.3)<br />

Table 4. Model performance<br />

4.2 Deforestation impacts<br />

Taking into account the current deforestation rate in the area which is being studied, the<br />

trend scenarios can be designed by 2013 and 2016, respectively. The results for DEFOR+20%<br />

and DEFOR+30% indicated increased runoff compared to the average from 1999-2007, 825.3<br />

m 3.s -1, to 1048.1 m 3.s -1 and 1163.7 m 3.s -1, resulting in an increase of 27% and 41%,<br />

respectively. During the dry season (characterized by a weak runoff), the flow trends to<br />

increase remarkably, what can be a concern for local population who use these rivers for


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

human supply, navigation (in some places, the only kind of transportation), and also for<br />

power generation. If these scenarios become real, the rivers of the basin will be subjected to<br />

a different runoff pattern that might cause some socioeconomic impact. Although the<br />

extreme scenarios are not realistic, the results are instructive because they clarify the nonlinear<br />

response of the hydrological cycle to the progressive changes in land cover.<br />

When modifying the land cover to 100%FOR, the annual calculated runoff average<br />

decreased from 825.3m3.s-1 to 329.1 m3.s-1, i.e., a decrease of about 60%. On the other hand,<br />

for the scenarios with 100%NOFOR and 100%MANMODIF, runoff increased to 2313.1m3.s-1, and 1729.4m3.s-1, an increase of 181%, and 109% of the observed annual runoff average,<br />

respectively.<br />

The parameters that most influenced the results in these scenarios were related to the<br />

amount of available soil water for evapotranspiration and canopy interception, which were<br />

modified according to the soil cover. The high interception in scenario 100%FOR leads to a<br />

reduction of precipitation that reaches the soil and thus reduces runoff. It also reduces the<br />

amount of water available for evaporation. Furthermore, the increase of flowing in scenarios<br />

100%NOFOREST and 100%MANMODIF is due to the substantial decrease in<br />

evapotranspiration and rainfall interception by the canopy. It is worth mentioning that this<br />

study used the same series of precipitation for all scenarios, but the precipitation in the<br />

region is a variable that has its intensity, largely influenced by local evaporation. Hence,<br />

decrease in evapotranspiration tends to reduce rainfall. The use of SLURP coupled to an<br />

atmospheric model can reveal more about this feedback mechanism in further studies.<br />

The elements of water balance are shown in Fig. 3. It may be noticed that evapotranspiration<br />

varies slightly between the scenarios, except the 100%NOFOR, where evapotranspiration is<br />

approximately 90% the value of the other scenarios. However, when the exchange of water<br />

between the surface and the atmosphere is divided into evaporation and transpiration, the<br />

peculiarities of each scenario are quite evident. In 100%FOREST, transpiration contributed<br />

to the increase of evapotranspiration. This is quite obvious, since in this scenario, the<br />

interaction between the surface and free atmosphere is dominated by the exchange of<br />

processes in the vegetation canopy. In 100% NOFOREST, the land cover formed by the<br />

typical savanna and pasture vegetation makes the transpiration to be twice as much as<br />

evaporation. In 100% MANMODIF, the deforested soil with urban characteristic implies a<br />

greater contribution in evaporation than in transpiration.<br />

It can be observed that the evapotranspiration and groundwater reduces slightly with the<br />

decrease of forest areas when we compare with the trend scenarios. In terms of numbers the<br />

evapotranspiration decreased from 20% to 30%, respectively; groundwater flow decreased<br />

20% and 8%, respectively. As long as deforestation leads to less water interception by<br />

vegetation, the contribution of evaporation increases with the expansion of the deforested<br />

area.<br />

Several studies suggest the local contribution of evapotranspiration as responsible for about<br />

50% of the precipitation that occurs in western Amazonia (Nóbrega, 2005; Marengo, 2006a;<br />

Nóbrega, 2008). Therefore, a decrease in vegetation cover over a region can alter the<br />

precipitation regime is this region (and neighborhood), decreasing the amount of water<br />

vapor originated there, because the evapotranspiration decreased in these simulated<br />

scenarios, and this trend, combined with the increase in flowing during dry periods, may<br />

worsen social and environmental problems during more critical periods.<br />

29


30<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 3. Observed and Simulated water balance components for scenarios DEFOR+20% and<br />

DEFOR+30<br />

4.3 Climate change impacts<br />

Daily changes in runoff due to temperature and precipitation variations are shown in Fig. 4.<br />

The effect when the rainfall increases or decreases in 20% was as expected. An increase in<br />

rainfalls tends to increase runoffs, and a decrease in rainfalls tends to decrease runoffs,<br />

which is more noticeable during the rainy season, when rains are more significant. For the<br />

scenario P +20, the runoff increased 31%, and setting P-20 decreased 13%, indicating that a<br />

increase rainfall will respond more significantly than the decrease in this specific region.<br />

These results allow an analysis that a decrease in rainfall may have a critical effect especially<br />

during the rainy season, affecting navigation, agricultural production, human consumption<br />

and power generation. Fig. 5 shows the seasonal average flow for the investigation period,<br />

confirming that the impacts are more significant during the rainy season.<br />

Fig. 4. Observed and Simulated runoff for scenarios P+20 and P-20


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

mm 3 /s<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dez<br />

Observed P+20 P-20<br />

Fig. 5. Superficial runoff monthly average Observed and simulated for scenarios P+20 and<br />

P-20<br />

Water balance changes due to changes in temperature and precipitation, it was observed<br />

that an increase in temperature tends to increase transpiration in both scenarios, and a<br />

decrease in rainfall tends to reduce evaporation (Fig. 6). The evapotranspiration increases<br />

30% and 54%, evaporation decreases 21% and increases 3%, transpiration increases 37% and<br />

41%, and groundwater decreases 35% and 33% for the sets of P-20 and P +20 respectively.<br />

(mm/yr).10 2<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Default P-20 P+20<br />

ETp E T G<br />

Fig. 6. Observed (Default) and simulated water balance components for scenarios P+20 and<br />

P-20<br />

It is important to mention that the simulation did not consider the impacts that deforestation<br />

would cause on climatic variables. Although with the results obtained from the simulation,<br />

it is possible to conclude that deforestation modifies substantially physical processes of the<br />

hydrological cycle.<br />

31


32<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Impacts are easier to be seen during the rainy season. Furthermore, with less water available<br />

for evapotranspiration, the vegetation may suffer from water stress. Although some authors<br />

found a precipitation increase in deforested areas (Li et al., 2007), if the deforestation keeps<br />

on increasing, the changes in the hydrological cycle might become unsustainable. The<br />

change in cover / land use can lead the current system to a new dry equilibrium, and<br />

vegetation should be modified to adapt itself to climate changes.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

Firstly, it was needed to make sure if the model could be used in that region, due to the lack<br />

of some meteorological data and the small slope of the region. Based on the NASH, RSR,<br />

PBIAS and D% criteria, the results indicate acceptable values. Furthermore, since it is a<br />

semi-distributed model, it requires less startup parameters than the distributed models, and<br />

also is able to calculate results faster.<br />

Deforestation in Amazonia has been occurring for some decades and the rate of annual<br />

growth is noticeable. In addition, this might be influenced by climatic and social-economics<br />

factors. Land cover/use changes simulations indicated that the runoff can be changed. The<br />

results suggest that there is an increase in runoff when deforestation occurs in the extreme<br />

and trend scenarios, associated with less interception of water by the canopy. If the average<br />

rate of deforestation continues to be about 3.45% per year in the basin, our simulations<br />

predict that the annual runoff will increase about 27% by 2013 and 41% by 2016. Samuel<br />

Hydropower, located on the Jamari river, began to be built in 1982. Between 2004 and 2006,<br />

the hydropower floodgates had to be opened because the river level reached its maximum<br />

level.<br />

The results make us believe that the ongoing deforestation could be responsible for<br />

opening these floodgates, since the observed data do not indicate more rain than the<br />

average. In used model, sediment load that affects the level increase of the river is not<br />

taken into account, but it is likely to result in a sediment increase due to the silt produced<br />

by deforestation.<br />

Evapotranspiration and groundwater tend to decrease with deforestation. Results show that<br />

the main impact might occur on transpiration, which tends to decrease with deforestation,<br />

while the evaporation tends to increase. Alterations in water balance in the Amazon can<br />

result in modifications in the local hydrological cycle, and agreeing with other studies, it<br />

will affect rain patterns there and close areas, once the water vapor generated goes straight<br />

to the neighborhood.<br />

6. References<br />

Brubaker, L.K., Entekhabi, D., and P.S. Eagleson. (1993). Estimation of continental<br />

precipitation recycling. J. Climate, Vol. 6, pp. 1077-1089.<br />

de Voogt, K., Kite, G.W., Droogers, P., and H. Murray-Rust. (1999). Modeling water<br />

allocation between a wetland and irrigated agriculture in the Gediz Basin,<br />

Turkey. Research Report, International Water Management Institute, Colombo,<br />

Sri Lanka


Impacts of Deforestation on Climate and Water Resources in Western Amazon<br />

Eltahir, E.A.B., and R.L. Bras. (1994). Precipitation recycling in the Amazon basin. Quart. J.<br />

R. Met. Soc., Vol. 120, pp. 861-880.<br />

Fearnside, P.M. (2007). Deforestation in Amazonia. Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. C.J.<br />

Cleveland (General Editor) & M. Hall-Beyer (Topic Editor). <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the <strong>Environment</strong>,<br />

Washington, D.C., U.S.A.<br />

Foley, I.A., Botta, A., Coe, M.T., and M.H. Costa. (2002). The El Niño-Southern Oscillation<br />

and the climate ecosystem and river of Amazonia. G. Biogeochemical Cycles,<br />

Vol.16, pp.1132-1144.<br />

Kannan, N. et al., (2007). Hydrological modelling of a small catchment using SWAT-2000 –<br />

Ensuring correct flow partitioning for contaminant modeling. J. Hydrology, Vol.<br />

3(34) pp. 64-72.<br />

Kite, G.W. (2005). Manual for the SLURP hydrological model. 236 p.<br />

Kite, G.W., and P. Droogers. (1999). Irrigation modeling in the context of basin water<br />

resources. J. Water Resources Development, Vol.15, pp. 43-54.<br />

Kite, G.W., Danard, M., and B. LI. (1998). Simulating long series of streamflow using data<br />

from an atmospheric model. Hydrological Sciences, Vol.43(3).<br />

Kite, G.W., and P. Droogers. (1999). Irrigation modeling in the context of basin water<br />

resources. J. Water Resources Development, Vol.15, pp. 43-54.<br />

Krusche, A.V., Ballester, M.V.R., and R.L. Victoria. (2005). Effects of land use changes in the<br />

biogeochemistry of fluvial systems of the Ji-Paraná river basin, Rondônia. Acta<br />

Amazônica, Vol. 35(2), pp. 192-205.<br />

Laurent, MESt, C. Valeo. (2003). Modeling runoff in the northern boreal forest using<br />

SLURP with snow ripening and frozen ground. Geophysical Research Abstracts,<br />

Vol. 5, pp. 06-30.<br />

Li, K.Y., Coe, M.T., Ramankutty, N., and R. Jong. (2007). Modeling the hydrological impact<br />

of land-use change in West Africa. J. Hydrology, Vol. 337, pp. 258-268.<br />

Marengo, J.A., (2006a). On the hydrological cycle of the Amazon basin: a historical review<br />

and current state-of-the-art. Rev. Brasil. Meteorologia, Vol. 21(3), pp. 1-19.<br />

Marengo, J.A., (2006b). Global Climate Changesand biodiversity efects. 201 p.<br />

Martz, W., and J. Garbrecht. (1999). An outlet breaching algorithm for the treatment of<br />

closed depressions in a raster DEM. Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 25, pp. 835-<br />

844.<br />

Moriasi, D.N. et al., (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of<br />

accuracy in watershed simulations. Vol. 50(3), pp. 885-900.<br />

Nóbrega R.S., (2008). Modeling impacts of deforestation in water resources of river basin<br />

Jamari (RO) using data surface and TRMM. D.Sc. Thesis. Federal University of<br />

Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil. 212p.<br />

Santos, C. A. (2001). Fronteira do Guaporé. Porto Velho/RO: EDUFRO.<br />

Su, M, Stolte, W.J., and G. van der Kamp. (2000). Modeling Canadian prairie wetland<br />

hydrology using a semi-distributed streamflow model. Hydrological Processes,<br />

Vol.14(14), pp. 2405-2422.<br />

Thorne R., and M. Woo. (2006). Efficacy of a hydrologic model in simulating discharge<br />

from a large mountainous catchment. J. of Hydrol, Vol. 30(1-2), pp.301-312.<br />

Trenberth, K.E. (1999). Atmospheric Moisture Recycling: Role of Advection and Local<br />

Evaporation. J. Climate, Vol. 12, pp.1368-1381.<br />

33


34<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Zhi, L., et al., (2009). Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an<br />

agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. J. Hydrology (doi:<br />

10.116/j.jhydrol.2009.08.007)


1. Introduction<br />

3<br />

Deforestation and<br />

Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

Maria Anete Lallo<br />

Universidade Paulista (UNIP), São Paulo<br />

Brazil<br />

Disease emergence or re-emergence is often the consequence of the societal and<br />

technological change and manifests frequently in an unpredictable manner. It has been<br />

estimated that among emerging diseases, 75% has zoonotic characteristics. Many factors<br />

influencing the emergence of zoonoses, such as environmental change and land use,<br />

changes in demographics, changes in technology and industry, increasing international<br />

travel and commerce, breakdown of public health measures, and microbial adaptation and<br />

change (Broglia & Kapel, 2011).<br />

Deforestation is one of the most disruptive changes affecting parasitic and vector<br />

populations. When the forest is cleared and erosion of the soil strips away the former state,<br />

if indeed, it is permitted and able to regenerate. The response of tropical forests to<br />

perturbation is affected by soil type, elevation, mean precipitation, and latitude. Cleared<br />

tropical forests are typically converted into grazing land for cattle, small-scale agricultural<br />

plots, human settlements or, left as open areas. Expansion of existing human settlements<br />

and movement of human populations create a need for increased food supply, leading to<br />

changes in the types and amounts of vegetation, thereby providing changed ecological<br />

niches and conditions for proliferation of newly arriving and/ or adaptive existing vectors<br />

and their parasites (Slifko et al., 2000). Deforestation is one of the changes that most affect<br />

the ecological niches of the disease, favoring the transmission of them (Patz et al., 2000;<br />

Slifko et al., 2000).<br />

The waterborne or food is the main route of transmission of parasitic diseases. Zoonoses<br />

such as giardiasis, cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis are waterborne diseases that<br />

include the participation of domestic and wild animals and man. <strong>Environment</strong>al changes<br />

and ecological disturbances, due to both natural phenomena and human intervention, have<br />

exerted and can be expected to continue to exert a marked influence on the emergence and<br />

proliferation of zoonotic parasitic diseases. They change the ecological balance the ecological<br />

balance and context within which vectors and their parasites breed, develop, and transmit<br />

disease (Patz et al, 2000).<br />

Interest in the contamination of drinking water by enteric pathogenic protozoa has increased<br />

considerably during the past three decades and a number of protozoan parasitic infections of<br />

humans are transmitted by the waterborne route (Patz et al., 2000; Slifko et al., 2000).


36<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Waterborne transmission is one of the main risk factors for intestinal diseases causing an<br />

important morbidity and mortality worldwide. Over 50% of the waterborne infections are<br />

produced by unknown agents. In the last years, for economic and environmental reasons,<br />

spreading sewage sludge on agricultural lands has increased. This might affect not only the<br />

circulation of recognized pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia, but also emerging<br />

pathogens, such as microsporidia. The general impression is that treatment of water has<br />

demonstrated a high efficacy of pathogen removal, however, as viable pathogen have been<br />

detected in water. It is important understand that the presence of human pathogens in<br />

surface water may suggest the presence of living environmental reservoirs, such as domestic<br />

and wild animals. Aquatic birds may play an important role in the transmission of different<br />

pathogens (Izquierdo et al., 2011).<br />

The parasites Cryptosporidium, Giardia e microsporidia are major of diarrheal disease in<br />

human, worldwide and have also been recognized as the predominat causes of waterborne<br />

diseases. Cryptosporidium, Giardia and microsporidia have life cycle wich are suited to<br />

waterborne and foodborne transmission. Their life cycle are completed within and<br />

individual host, with transmission by fecal-oral route. The transmissible stages,<br />

Cryptosporidium oocysts or Giardia cysts or microsporidia spores, are produced in a large<br />

numbers and are infectious when excreted, a marked resistence to environmental and water<br />

treatment stresses, wich assists their dissemination, and have the potential to be transmitted<br />

from non-human to human hosts (zoonoses) and vice-versa, enhancing the reservoir of<br />

(oo)cysts or spores markedly (Smith et al, 2007). The purpose of this chapter is to show the<br />

biological and epidemiological aspects most relevant of the parasites Cryptosporidium,<br />

Giardia and microsporidia responsible for waterborne parasitic diseases most important.<br />

2. Cryptosporidiosis<br />

It is a parasitic disease caused by protozoa of the genus Cryptosporidium, which affects<br />

amphibians, birds, mammals, reptiles and fish and is characterized by impairment of the<br />

digestive system. Since its first description in the 1970s, cryptosporidiosis has been considered<br />

an opportunistic infection in immunodeficient individuals, it is known today, however, that it<br />

is a prevalent disease in immunocompetent individuals also important. Many studies have<br />

also revealed the prevalence of this protozoan infection in animals, although the zoonotic<br />

transmission of the disease is not yet fully understood (Fayer et al., 2010).<br />

2.1 About the agent and the disease<br />

Cryptosporidium is a protozoan that has about 22 identified species (Table 1). Although many<br />

species have been described to date, C. parvum is the most widespread species of mammals,<br />

including man. It is known that C. parvum is not a homogeneous species since the isoenzyme<br />

analysis and DNA sequencing revealed differences between oocysts isolated from various<br />

animal species. 7 genotypes have been identified - of cattle, humans, mice, pigs, opossuns,<br />

dogs and ferrets (Fayer 2010; Plutzer Karanis, 2009).<br />

As in other coccidian monoxenic its life cycle is not employing intermediate host.<br />

Cryptospodirium oocysts are small and contain four sporozoites inside free. When they are<br />

ingested by the host, the oocysts release of sporozoites in the small intestine, which invade<br />

intestinal cells. The sporozoites begin multiplying to form asexual meront type I and type II


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

with 4 and 8 merozoites, respectively. The type II merozoites give rise to the sexual phase of<br />

the cycle or gametogony with differentiation stages in male (microgametes) and female<br />

(macrogametes). The microgametes penetrates macrogamete leading to the formation of a<br />

zygote that develops into oocyst. Are two types of oocysts produced - a kind of thin-walled<br />

autoinfectante able to release within the host, starting a new cycle and a thick-walled, highly<br />

resistant to environmental conditions, which is eliminated in feces. The cycle time is variable<br />

and may occur in up to 48 hours or 14 days depending on the host species. Unlike other<br />

coccidia, which eliminate the non-sporulated oocysts, the oocysts of C. parvum undergo<br />

sporulation within the host, eliminating the already infective for the environment (Carey,<br />

2004; Chalmers & Davies, 2009).<br />

Species Hosts<br />

Fishes<br />

Psicicryptosporidium cichlidis Oreochromis miloticus e Tilapia zilli<br />

Psicicryptosporidium reichenbachklinkei Trichogaster leeri<br />

Cryptosporidium molnari Sparus auratusDicentrarchus labrax (Gilthead)<br />

C.scophthalmi Scophthalmus maximus(Turbot)<br />

Amphibians and reptiles<br />

C. serpentis Elaphe guttata (Corn snake)<br />

C. varanii Varanus prasinus (Emerald monitor)<br />

C. fragile Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Black-spined toad)<br />

Birds<br />

C. meleagridis Meleagris gallopavo (turkey)<br />

C. baileyi Gallus gallus (chicken)<br />

C. galli Gallus gallus (chicken)<br />

Mammals<br />

C. muris Mus musculus (mice)<br />

C. parvum Mus musculus (mice)<br />

C. wrairi Cavia porcellus (guinea pig)<br />

C. felis Felis catis (cat)<br />

C. andersoni Bos taurus (cattle)<br />

C. canis Canis familiaris (dog)<br />

C. hominis Homo sapiens (man)<br />

C. suis Sus scrofa (pig)<br />

C. bovis Bos taurus (cattle)<br />

C. fayeri Macropus rufus (kangaroo)<br />

C. ryanae Bos taurus (cattle)<br />

C. macropodum Macropus giganteus (kangaroo)<br />

Table 1. Species of Cryptosporidium by Fayer (2010).<br />

The pathogenesis and clinical picture of criptoporidiose are influenced by several factors,<br />

including animal species, age, immune response and association with other pathogens. The<br />

infection can range from subclinical to severe, And have more severe disease (Table 2). In<br />

humans, the incubation period is 20-10 days and the duration of the disease in<br />

immunocompetent individuals, up to 3 weeks. In immunodeficient or immunosuppressed<br />

individuals, infection is chronic, with symptoms and elimination of persistent oocysts. The<br />

37


38<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

clinical signs manifested in cryptosporidiosis include profuse watery diarrhea, vomiting,<br />

anorexia, weight loss, abdominal pain, fever and dehydration. In immunocompetent<br />

individuals, these symptoms are mild and transient. The spread of infection to the<br />

gallbladder and bile ducts, pancreas and respiratory system is common in AIDS patients<br />

(Barr, 1998; Chalmers & davies, 2009).<br />

The diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is based on the meeting of the parasite in feces, using<br />

methods of concentration of oocysts, such as formaldehyde or ether flotation with saturated<br />

sucrose solution, associated with staining techniques, such as Ziehl- Nielsen, Kinyoun,<br />

fuchsin or safranin. Different immunological techniques have been used for the diagnosis of<br />

human cryptosporidiosis. Among them, ELISA or immunofluorescence with monoclonal or<br />

polyclonal antibodies are used to detect oocysts in the feces. The PCR technique is an<br />

alternative to both conventional diagnosis of Cryptosporidium in fecal specimens and in<br />

environmental samples. Although PCR is rapid, sensitive and accurate, has limitations as<br />

the detection of nucleic acid of viable organisms, naked nucleic acid and the possibility of<br />

laboratory contamination. We recommend its use for oocysts in water samples (Fayer et al.,<br />

2000; Marquardt et al., 2000; Xiao, 2002).<br />

Characteristics Immunodeficient individuals<br />

Immunocompetent<br />

individuals<br />

Susceptible population<br />

Immunocompromised persons<br />

of all ages, especially with AIDS<br />

Children, first with less than<br />

1 year of age and adults of all<br />

ages<br />

Infection sites Intestinal or extraintestinal Intestinal usually<br />

Enteric form<br />

Asymptomatic or transient or<br />

chronic diarrhea or fulminant<br />

Asymptomatic, acute and<br />

persistent<br />

Clinic form<br />

Diarrhea, fever, abdominal<br />

Diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain,<br />

cramps, weight loss, nausea<br />

weight loss e vômitos<br />

and vomiting<br />

Table 2. Characteristics of cryptosporidiosis in humans.<br />

2.2 Epidemiology and prophylaxis<br />

Cross-transmission studies revealed that oocysts obtained from humans are infective to<br />

other mammals, as oocysts from animals that are infectious to other species, it is a zoonotic<br />

disease potential. The epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis is influenced by the capacity of<br />

thick-walled oocysts survive in the environment (Table 3) (Xiao, 2002).<br />

Temperature Survival Time<br />

25 e 30C 3 months<br />

20C 6 months<br />

15C 7 months<br />

-20 e -70C Feel hours<br />

Table 3. Survivel condition of Cryptosporidium oocysts<br />

The oocyst is the oral-fecal route and occurs until now, have been described various forms<br />

of transmission, can be highlighted - from person to person by direct or indirect contact,


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

including sexual activities, from animal to animal, animal to man, by drinking water or<br />

recreation, from food and air. The number of oocysts required to establish an infection is small,<br />

it is estimated that the infectious dose varies from 9 to 1,000 oocysts (Fayer et al., 2010).<br />

Feces containing oocysts contaminate soil, food and water. The movement of oocysts in the<br />

environment is favored by the winds, the rain water, the movement of animals and the actions<br />

of man himself. The major outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis reported in HIV-negative people are<br />

linked to the ingestion of water contaminated with oocysts derived from cattle or sheep. This<br />

water containing oocysts also contaminated foods, especially vegetables and fruits, and is<br />

another important way of transmission in outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis. Additionally, food<br />

can be contaminated by the hands of manipulators (Robinson et al., 2010).<br />

A variety of risk factors are associated with infection by Cryptosporidium, among them stand<br />

out from the deficiency of the immune response, the presence of concomitant infections,<br />

ingestion of contaminated food and water, poor sanitary conditions and occupational<br />

exposure, is the contact with animals or infected humans (Plutzer et al., 2009).<br />

From the earliest descriptions of cryptosporidiosis in humans, the number of cases has<br />

continued to grow, in the case of individual reports or outbreaks, such infection is attributed to<br />

C. parvum. The average prevalence in industrialized countries by 2.2% in immunocompetent<br />

individuals and 14% in HIV-positive. Already in developing countries, these numbers increase<br />

and may reach 8.5% in immunocompetent patients and 24% in HIV-positive. This means that<br />

proper sanitary conditions and a rigorous treatment of the water, as seen in developed<br />

countries, the spread of the disease can be decreased (Hajdušek et al., 2004).<br />

In the United States, an estimated 50% of the animals from cattle herds eliminate oocysts of<br />

C. parvum, however, the disease is preferentially observed in calves that manifest from the<br />

4th day of life until the fourth week. In other domestic animals, the prevalence of<br />

cryptosporidiosis is less valued, however it is known that predominates in neonates and<br />

young people (Thompson et al., 2009).<br />

Human or animal cryptosporidiosis can only be controlled if the oocysts of the parasite is<br />

eliminated or destroyed. The oocysts can spread and persist in the environment for a long<br />

time. Moreover, it is known that this parasitic form also resists water to conventional<br />

treatments such as chlorination and filtration. Giardia is 14 to 30 times more susceptible to<br />

water treatment with chlorine or ozone. Either way, ozone is the most effective chemical<br />

agent in the inactivation of Cryptosporidium oocysts (Thompson et al., 2008).<br />

To reduce the risk of infection of individuals more susceptible to cryptosporidiosis, such as<br />

HIV-positive, immunosuppressed individuals and children, it is recommended that drinking<br />

water be boiled for about 1 minute before ingestion. The same recommendation should be<br />

made for the young or immunodeficient animals (Fayer et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2008).<br />

Others include general health care and proper cleaning of the hands of food handlers,<br />

proper disposal of animal waste, sewage treatment, washing litter boxes with boiling water,<br />

among others (Chalmers & Davies, 2009).<br />

One should keep susceptible individuals, HIV-positive or immunosuppressed, have contact<br />

with the feces of pets, especially if they have less than 6 months old. If this is not possible,<br />

you should recommend the appropriate use of gloves. Not recommended the removal of<br />

this person's contact with your pet because of the strong emotional bond that unites them.<br />

Immunosuppressed patients should ideally acquire an animal older than 6 months, you do<br />

not have diarrhea and it has been previously examined by a veterinarian (Fayer et al, 2000;<br />

Xiao, 2010).<br />

39


40<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Of the various species of Cryptosporidium, C. parvum has been observed in a larger number of<br />

human infections, and reaches a large number of animal species. Within this species, two<br />

genotypes are, most of the time, described the infection - the human (38% of infections) and<br />

cattle (62% of infections). Thus, for the human cryptosporidiosis occurring bovine genotype<br />

is necessary to contact with infected animals such as cattle, sheep and goats, or that there is<br />

environmental contamination, especially water and food. Several cases of cryptosporidiosis<br />

have been reported in veterinary students and animal handlers, resulting probably from<br />

contact with infected animals, especially cattle, which reinforces the possibility of such<br />

transmission. Recently, the dog genotype of C. parvum has also been identified in human<br />

infections(Fayer et al, 2000; Xiao, 2010).<br />

All these evidences indicate that a large number of hosts and genotypes may be involved in<br />

cryptosporidiosis and molecular characterization of this parasite should facilitate<br />

understanding of the epidemiology of the disease. While these points are not completely<br />

understood, it is recommended the adoption of control measures in situations of potential<br />

risk (Xiao, 2010).<br />

3. Giardiasis<br />

It is a disease caused by the flagellate protozoan Giardia, intestinal parasite of a wide variety<br />

of animals, including man, constituting one of the most prevalent intestinal parasites,<br />

known and described throughout the world (Marquardt et al.,2000).<br />

3.1 About the agent and the disease<br />

The most accepted classification of the genus Giardia is based on its morphological<br />

characteristics, with six described species - G. agilis, G. Muris, G. psittaci, G. ardeae, G. microti<br />

and G. duodenalis (Table 4). G. duodenalis is also known as G. intestinalis or G. lamblia. This<br />

protozoan has two simple forms of life - the trophozoite and cyst. The trophozoite lives in<br />

the small intestine where they act by the scourges, but many are adhering to the intestinal<br />

mucosa. The cyst is ovoid and is surrounded by a proteinaceous fibrous wall that confers<br />

resistance to the environment conditions (Hopkins et al., 1997; Volotão et al, 2007).<br />

Giardia has a direct life cycle and its transmission is oro-faecal route. Drinking water<br />

contaminated with cysts represents a major cause of giardiasis in humans and other<br />

animals, which is therefore considered a waterborne disease (Kulda & Nohýnková, 1995).<br />

Inside the host, the cyst release two trophozoites that attach to the small intestine. The<br />

trophozoites start their asexual multiplication by binary fission and by action of bile salts<br />

and alkaline pH suffer encystment, but the mechanism and where this occurs remain<br />

unknown (Bogitsh & Cheng, 1998).<br />

Giardiasis may present as an asymptomatic or symptomatic, Acute or chronic disease. In<br />

adult animals, the infection is usually asymptomatic and is rarely detected. Already in<br />

young animals aged less than one year, clinical signs and symptoms may be present and<br />

identification of the parasite is more easily obtained (Thompson, 2000).<br />

In general, clinical signs and symptoms observed in giardiasis include diarrhea, acute or<br />

chronic, steatorrhea, abdominal pain, lethargy, anorexia, flatulence, fatigue, abdominal<br />

distension, nausea, mucus in stools, growth deficits and weight loss (Bogitsh & Cheng,<br />

1998).


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

The elimination intermittent cysts and lack of specific clinical signs makes the diagnosis of<br />

Giardia more difficult and requires multiple fecal examinations are carried out within 4 to 5<br />

days (Kulda & Nohýnková, 1995).<br />

Species and genotypes Hosts<br />

G. microti Muskrat and voles<br />

G. agilis Amphibians<br />

G. muris Rodents<br />

G. psittaci Birds<br />

G. ardeae Birds<br />

G. duodenalis (G. intestinalis ou G.<br />

lamblia)<br />

Genotypes of G. duodenalis<br />

Mammals<br />

Genotype A<br />

Humans, primates, dogs, cats, cattle, rodents, wild<br />

animals<br />

Genotype B Humans, primates, dogs, horse, cattle<br />

Genotype C Dogs<br />

Genotype D Dogs<br />

Genotype E Ungulates<br />

Genotype F Cats<br />

Genotype G Rodents<br />

Table 4. Species and genotypes of Giardia.<br />

Techniques that promote the fluctuation of the cysts, using saturated solutions of zinc<br />

sulphate and sugar, are methods that allow diagnosis of most cases. Another method of<br />

diagnosis is an ELISA assay, which detects Giardia antigen in faeces preserved in formalin or<br />

kept under refrigeration. In humans, the sensitivity and specificity of this test is high (100%<br />

and 96%, respectively), allowing quick diagnosis, however, its use in dogs and cats revealed<br />

similar results flotation techniques, which are preferred for their low cost and ease of<br />

implementation.The indirect immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)<br />

have been used for epidemiological studies or as research tools (Kulda & Nohýnková, 1995).<br />

3.2 Epidemiology and prophylaxis<br />

Giardiasis is spread throughout the world being described more than 250 million<br />

symptomatic cases in humans for years and is now included as the list of neglected diseases<br />

made by the World Health Organization in humans, its prevalence depends on the level of<br />

hygiene and sanitary facilities, ranging from 2% to 43%. Children are more susceptible to<br />

infection because of its low immunity and their lack of hygiene. In adults, infection may<br />

provide a certain degree of resistance to subsequent infections, reducing its prevalence in<br />

this age group (Mohammed Mahdy et al, 2008; Monis &Thompson, 2003).<br />

Although giardiasis is classified as a zoonosis by the World Health Organization, it is<br />

unclear the exact participation of animals in the epidemiological chain of transmission of<br />

this disease. However one must consider that the interaction of multiple hosts associated<br />

with environmental conditions are essential links to propitiate the occurrence of giardiasis,<br />

which just as cryptosporidiosis, are the waterborne disease (Mohammed Mahdy et al, 2008;<br />

Monis &Thompson, 2003).<br />

41


42<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Of all the species of Giardia only G. duodenalis has been observed in humans, livestock and<br />

pets. Many of these animals possess a particular genotype, but they all have infections with<br />

genotypes A and B also found in humans. The number of molecular studies involving the<br />

infection observed in man with concomitant infections in animals is very restricted in<br />

aboriginal Australians were detected 13 human cases and 9 dogs in the genotype A, as<br />

found cases of giardiasis by genotypes A and B simultaneously in dogs and humans in<br />

Bangkok. Some wild animals such as beavers and rats, which have a high prevalence of<br />

giardiasis by genotype B, has historically been considered important sources of water<br />

contamination (Cacció & Ryan 2008).<br />

The intake of only 10 cysts of Giardia is sufficient to determine the disease and an infected<br />

person can eliminate up to 300 million cysts per ml of feces (Inpankaew et al, 2007).<br />

The infection is acquired by ingesting contaminated food or water. Cysts remain viable for<br />

weeks in water, which facilitates its transmission. The survival of cysts in the water the same<br />

temperature dependent and may remain viable for up to 2 months in water at 8 ºC and for<br />

only 4 hours in water at 37 °C (Xiao & Fayer, 2008).<br />

Water contamination is through human sewage or feces from infected animals. The<br />

occurrence of giardiasis in sparsely populated areas, such as the Arctic region of Canada,<br />

reinforces the hypothesis that wild animals such as beavers, constitute important sources of<br />

infection. The beavers have 44% prevalence of Giardia and therefore are reservoirs for<br />

human infection. As the transmission of this disease occurs by contamination of water, food<br />

and environment as described in Table 5, the prevention of giardiasis include environmental<br />

sanitation (Hunter &Thompson, 2005).<br />

Lack of hygiene of food handlers<br />

Use of contaminated feces, sewage and manure as fertilizer for agriculture<br />

Grazing cattle close to agriculture<br />

Defecation of infected wild hosts in plantations<br />

Vector-borne contamination of food contaminated by sewage<br />

Use of animal manure or soil contaminated with human feces in agriculture<br />

Use of contaminated water for irrigation<br />

Use of contaminated water to dilute insecticides or fungicides<br />

Wash salads and raw foods in contaminated water<br />

Use of contaminated water to make ice or frozen foods<br />

Use of contaminated water to make food that they receive the least amount of heating or<br />

treatment with preservatives<br />

Table 5. Possible sources of food contamination.<br />

The water should be protected from possible contamination by proper disposal and<br />

treatment of sewage from humans or animals. Because Giardia is resistant to routine<br />

chlorination of water, it is recommended that the flocculation, sedimentation and filtration<br />

of water are carried out before use. When the water is not subjected to such treatment, there<br />

should be boiling water, which promotes the complete removal of Giardia cysts. The greatest<br />

risk of zoonotic transmission is related to the genotype of G. duodenalis, which has been<br />

described in humans, farm animals, dogs, cats, beavers and in rodents (Hunter &<br />

Thompson, 2005; Jerlström-Hultqvist, 2010).


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

Farm animals, especially cattle, are an important source of infection for man. Cattle with<br />

giardiasis can eliminate up to one million cysts per gram of feces, so few infected animals<br />

are a major risk to public health (Thompson et al, 2008).<br />

Although the clinical consequences of infection with Giardia in dogs and cats seem to be<br />

minimal, there are grounds for believing that such animals are important sources of<br />

infection in urban areas. Molecular epidemiology studies have shown that some genotypes<br />

are closely related to the infection in humans and dogs (Smith et al., 2007).<br />

4. Microsporidiosis<br />

Microsporidia are small eukaryotic intracellular parasites considered to be true, due to the<br />

presence of nuclear envelope coated core of intracytoplasmic membrane systems and<br />

separation of chromosomes by mitotic spindle. However, these protozoa also possess<br />

characteristics of prokaryotes, as a small ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the absence of<br />

mitocrôndrias, peroxisomes and Golgi cisterns. These indicators point to the fact that they<br />

are phylogenetically very primitive protozoa, however, molecular studies reveal a close<br />

proximity of this group of parasites with the fungi, a fact that still causes doubts in the<br />

classification of these parasites. Diarrhea is the most frequent health problem caused, mainly<br />

in immunocomopromised people. The transmission routes indicated are via airborne,<br />

person-to-person, zoonotic, and waterborne means (Didier, 2005; Theiller, Breton, 2008).<br />

4.1 About the agent and the disease<br />

The life cycle of microsporidia includes three distinct phases: the spores responsible for<br />

transmission of infection, the proliferation of vegetative forms of intracellular schizogony or<br />

merogony calls, and finally the formation of spores or sporogony (Mathis, 2000).<br />

The spores are very resistant structures to environmental conditions in its interior is an<br />

extrusion apparatus (polar tubule), whose function is to inject the infective material<br />

(sporoplasm) into the host cell. In the presence of favorable conditions, the extruded polar<br />

tubule and enters the host cell to inoculate sporoplasm in the cytoplasm of the same. The<br />

sporoplasm injected into the host cell starts proliferation merogony stage. His rapid<br />

multiplication occurs by binary or multiple fission. Then sporogony begins when meront<br />

acquire a dense amorphous layer around the cell, being called sporonts. These again can<br />

grow and multiply by binary or multiple fission sporoblasts to form, which, in turn, develop<br />

distinct cytoplasmic organelles and a thick wall, making the spores mature. The spores<br />

spread through the tissues of the host by infecting new cells and continuing the cycle<br />

(Mathis, 2000; Weiser, 2005).<br />

So far, no evidence of intermediate hosts or vectors of microsporidial infection in man. For<br />

some genera that infect mosquitoes, has been reported a complex sequence of development,<br />

involving alternation between different invertebrate hosts (Weber et al., 2002).<br />

The development of some species of microsporidia can be confined to cells of a single organ.<br />

However, other species can cause systemic infection. The clinical manifestations of infection<br />

are dependent on the species infected and the competence of the host immune response. The<br />

imbalance in the parasite-host relationship results in the proliferation and spread, causing<br />

cell destruction (Didier, 2005).<br />

So far have been described about 1000 species of microsporidia belonging to 100 genera,<br />

however, this number will increase as new hosts are being researched. In humans, the<br />

infection was first described by Matsubayashi et al. in 1959 and since then an increasing<br />

43


44<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

number of cases have been reported particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The<br />

clinical manifestations include ocular lesions (conjunctivitis, chorioretinitis), muscles<br />

(myositis), kidney (nephritis), neurological (encephalitis), liver (hepatitis), peritoneal<br />

(peritonitis) and others (Abreu-Costa, 2005; Lallo et al., 2002; Lallo & Bondan, 2005; Weber et<br />

al., 2002).<br />

Some species of microsporidia infecting invertebrates and can cause serious economic<br />

losses. Two well-known examples are the Bombyx mori, which affects the creations of<br />

silkworm and Nosema apis, which infects bees and honey production decreases. On the other<br />

hand, some species are used in biological control of some pests, for example, Nosema locustae<br />

used to control locusts (Mathis, 2000; Méténier & Vivarès, 2001).<br />

More than 60 species, 11 genera of microsporidia have been described in fish. The most<br />

important genera are: Glugea, Pleistophora and Sprague. In freshwater fish and saltwater, the<br />

infection is highly contagious and can be fatal, the parasite is found in the intestine, bile<br />

ducts, liver, mesenteric lymph nodes, nerve ganglia, in the subcutaneous tissue, testes and<br />

ovaries (Rodriguez-Tovar et al.,2011).<br />

We found cysts of Giardia were found in faecal samples from 2 prehensile-tailed porcupines<br />

(Coendou villosus) and Cryptoporidium oocysts in 3 rodents - montane akodont (Akodon<br />

montensis), ebony akodont (Thaptomyces nigrita) and guainan squirrel (Sciurus aestuans).<br />

Microporidia spores were seen in the stools of small rodents, including 3 montane akodonts,<br />

1 prehensile-tailed porcupine and 2 pigmy rice rats (Oligoryzomys sp.), as well as of 3<br />

marsupials, including 1 gray slender mouse opossum (Marmosops incanus) and 1 big eared<br />

opossums (Didelphis aurita), and of 3 hairy-legged vampire bats (Diphylla ecaudata). This was<br />

the first description of microsporidiosis in wildlife animals in Brazil. The study emphasizes<br />

the importance of the animals, particularly small wild mammals, as potential sources of<br />

parasite infection to other animal populations, including man, in areas of deforestation<br />

(Lallo et al. 2009; Pereira et al. 2009).<br />

Few cases of human microsporidiosis had been reported until the advent of AIDS. However,<br />

it is now considered emerging and cosmopolitan. Among the species that cause human<br />

microsporidiosis, E. bieneusi is responsible for most infections occurring in approximately<br />

40% of AIDS patients who have chronic diarrhea. It is not clear, however, what the risk<br />

factors that may be related to the prevalence of infection. Most reports occur in male<br />

patients, HIV-positive and CD4+ lymphocyte count at or below 100 cells/mm3, with few<br />

cases observed in women and children (Malčekova, 2010).<br />

4.2 Epidemiology and prophylaxis<br />

There is much controversy about the mechanisms of transmission of microsporidia. It is<br />

believed that the ingestion of spores is an important route for the species that infect the<br />

gastrointestinal tract of man and that environmental contamination occurs by the spread of<br />

the spores contained in faeces, urine and other excretions. In foxes, domestic dogs and<br />

squirrels, it was observed that transplacental transmission is an important mechanism of<br />

spread of the disease (Bern, 2005; Weiss, 2001).<br />

Although microsporidia spores are resistant to the environment, can be inactivated when<br />

exposed for 30 minutes at 70% alcohol, 1% formaldehyde or hydrogen peroxide 1% as well<br />

as when they are autoclaved for 10 minutes at 120ºC (Méténier & Vivarès, 2001).<br />

The phenotypic and genotypic differences among strains of Encephalitozoon cuniculi can be<br />

used to indicate the main sources of infection for man. The lack of a specific host, coupled<br />

with the fact that the primate is susceptible to encephalitozoonosis suggests that man can<br />

become infected when exposed to an infected animal (Bern, 2005).


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

The possibility that microsporidiosis is a zoonotic disease is still obscure. However, one<br />

must consider that these primitive protozoa have great capacity to adapt, since they are<br />

distributed among different groups of invertebrates and vertebrates (Didier, 2005).<br />

Transmission of invertebrate microsporidia to humans has been considered impossible. This<br />

hypothesis is based on the temperature differences between the two classes of animals.<br />

However, Trammer et al. (1997) obtained infection of athymic mice inoculated with Nosema<br />

algerae, one of Microsporidian of the culicids. These results demonstrate for the first time it is<br />

possible the development of invertebrate microsporidia in mammalian hosts. Therefore, one<br />

should consider the possibility that invertebrates may be sources of infection for human<br />

microsporidiosis.<br />

Diarrhea is the most frequent health problem caused by microsporidia, mainly in<br />

immunocompromised people. Waterborne transmission of microsporidia spores has not yet<br />

been appropriately addressed in epidemiological studies, due to the small size of spores.<br />

Their presence have been associated with waterborne outbreaks and also with recreational<br />

and river water (Fournier et al., 2000; Izquierdo et al., 2011).<br />

Several drugs have been used to treat microsporidiosis. Fumagillin was the first drug to<br />

have effective results in the control of Nosema apis and was subsequently described as a<br />

broad-spectrum drugs to combat various species of microsporidia that parasitise insects.<br />

This drug has managed to control the multiplication of E. cuniculi in vitro and has been<br />

effective in the treatment of ocular infection by E. hellen in HIV-positive (Mathis, 2000).<br />

Other active ingredients have been used to combat the microsporidia of invertebrates and<br />

small vertebrates. However, there are few drugs licensed for human use. Albendazol seems to<br />

be the most appropriate drug to combat infection by microsporidia (Bern, 2005; Weiss, 2001).<br />

Measures aimed at preventing infection by microsporidia are not specific, since the mode of<br />

transmission and sources of infection for the disease remain uncertain. However, as the<br />

transmission of this parasite appears to be based on the ingestion of spores from feces and<br />

urine, preventive measures aimed at controlling the intake of them. In hospital settings<br />

precautions with body fluids, and good personal hygiene of infected individuals. These<br />

measures are particularly important for the prevention of eye infection, which results from<br />

hands and fingers contaminated by spores of respiratory fluids or urine (Didier, 2005).<br />

The infective potential of the spores can only be evaluated in vitro for species that grow in<br />

cell culture. Experimental studies show that microsporidia spores can survive for months or<br />

years, depending on humidity and temperature, due to their chitin wall. Disinfectants usual,<br />

the simple boiling and autoclaving can kill the spores (Weiser,2005).<br />

5. Relationship between deforestation and the perpetuation of the parasites<br />

and enviromental<br />

Deforestation and ensuing changes in landuse, human settlement, commercial development,<br />

construction of roads, water control systems (dams, canals, irrigation systems, reservoirs),<br />

and climate singly and in combination have been accompanied by global increases in<br />

morbidity and mortality from a number of emergent parasitic diseases.<br />

The nature and extent of change in the incidence of parasitic disease are affected by changes in<br />

landuse and settlement, the time interval from one landuse to another/others, changes in type<br />

of soil and its degree of water absorption, changes in vegetation characteristics, changes in the<br />

types and amounts of bodies of water, their size, shape, temperature, pH, flow, movement,<br />

sedimentation and proximity to vegetation and, changes in climate (Table 6).<br />

45


46<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Deforestation envariomental changes<br />

Grazing land (cattle):<br />

create supportive habitat for parasites (specially Cryptosporidium genotype cattle)<br />

Small-scale agricultural plots:<br />

promove food contamination by water<br />

sugar cane or rice may be surrounded by a network of irrigation ditches and artificial<br />

bodies of farms and wells<br />

Climate changes:<br />

warmer temperatures cause increased precipitation intensity and more rainfall events,<br />

favoring the survival of cysts, oocysts and spores of the parasites in the environment<br />

Open areas:<br />

cleared lands have neutral pH and steep inclines and streams make large pools, both<br />

changes promote the creation of a microclimate favorable to the persistence of parasites in<br />

the environment<br />

Humans settlements:<br />

migrants become a new reservoir for transmission of parasitic disease (migrants, foreign<br />

or non-immune resident settlers, indigenous)<br />

animals and humans are exposed to new contacts in new environments<br />

roads facilitate acceleration of crop farming, ranching, logging, mining, commercial<br />

development, tourism and, building of dams and hydroelectric plants and new<br />

settlements, increase erosion and blocking the flow of streams<br />

Table 6. <strong>Environment</strong>al changes caused by deforestation and its relationship with the<br />

emerging parasites.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

Cryptosporidium, Giardia and microsporidia are single-celled, microscopic organisms and are<br />

disease-causing parasites that may infect people through contaminated drinking water and<br />

recreational waters. Symptoms resulting from infection include mild to severe diarrhea,<br />

abdominal cramps, weight loss, bloating, and vomiting. Chlorine, a commonly used<br />

disinfectant in water supplies, can not eliminate Giardia, Cryptosporidium or microsporidia<br />

from water sources. Rates of deforestation have grown explosively since the beginning of<br />

the twentieth century. Driven by local to global demand for agricultural and forest products<br />

and expanding human population centers, large swaths of species-rich tropical and<br />

temperate forest, and prairies, grasslands, and wetlands, have been converted to specie-poor<br />

agriculatural and ranching areas. The global rate of tropical deforestation is continuing at<br />

staggering levels well into this decade, with more than 2.3% of humid tropical forests<br />

cleared between 2000 and 2005 alone. Parallel to this habitat destruction is an exponential<br />

growth in human-wildlife interaction and conflict, which has resulted in exposure to new<br />

pathogens for humans, livestock, and wildelife. This way, we can conclude that<br />

deforestation can contribute to transmission of waterborne diseases.<br />

7. Reference<br />

Abreu-Acosta, N. et al. (2005). Enterocytozoon bieneusi (microsporidia) in clinical samples<br />

from immunocompetent individuals in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Trans.<br />

Royal Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., Vol. 99, pp. 848-855.


Deforestation and Water Borne Parasitic Zoonoses<br />

Barr, S.C. (1998). Cryptosporidiosis and cyclosporidiosis. In: Infectious diseases of the dog and<br />

cat. GREENE, C.E., pp.518-524, W B Saunders, Philadelphia.<br />

Bern, C. et al. (2005). The epidemiology of intestinal microsporidiosis in patient with HIV-<br />

AIDS in Lima, Peru. J. Infec. Dis., Vol.191, pp.1658-64.<br />

Bogitsh, B.; Cheng, T.C. (1998). Human parasitology. pp. 210. Academic Press, San Diego.<br />

Broglia, A.; Kapel, C. (2011) Changing dietary habits in a changing world: emerging drivers for<br />

the transmission of foodborne parasitic zoososes. Vet. Parasitol., Vol.182, pp.2-13.<br />

Cacció, S.M.; Ryan, U. (2008). Molecular epidemiology of giardiasis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol,<br />

Vol.160, pp.75-80.<br />

Carey, C.M. et al. (2004). Biolgy, persistence and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and<br />

Cryptosporidium hominis oocysts. Water Research, Vol.38, pp.818-862.<br />

Chalmers, R.M.; Davies, A.P. (2009). Minireview: clinical cryptosporidiosis. Exp. Parasitol.<br />

Vol.76, pp.1976-1979.<br />

Didier, E.S. (2005) Microsporidiosis: an emerging and opportunistc infection in humans and<br />

animals. Acta Trop., Vol.94, pp.61-76.<br />

Fayer, R. et al. (2000). Epidemiology of Cryptoporidium: transmission, detection and<br />

identification. Intern. J. Parasitol. Vol.30, p.1305-1322.<br />

Fayer, R. (2010) Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Exp. Parasitol.<br />

Vol.124, pp.90-97.<br />

Fayer, R. et. al. (2010) Crypstosporidium ubiquitum n. sp. in animals and humans. Vet.<br />

Parasitol. Vol.172, pp.23-32.<br />

Fournier, S. et al. (2000). Detection of microsporidia in surface water: a one-year follow-up<br />

study. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., Vol.29, pp.95-100.<br />

Hajdušek, O. et al. (2004). Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in animal and<br />

human hosts from the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. Vol.122, pp.183-192.<br />

Hopkins, R.M. et al. (1997). Ribossomal RNA sequencing reveals differences between the<br />

genotypes of Giardia isolates recovered from humans and dogs living in the same<br />

locality. J. Parasitol. Vol.83, pp.44-51.<br />

Hunter, P.R.; Thompson, R.C.A. (2005). The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and<br />

Cryptosporidium. Int. J. Parasitol. Vol.35, pp.1181-1190.<br />

Inpankaew, T. et al. (2007). Canine parasitic zoonoses and temple communities in Thailand.<br />

Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public. Health. Vol.38, pp.247-255.<br />

Izquierdo, F. et al. (2011). Detection of microsporidia in drinking water, wastewater and<br />

recreational rivers. Water Res., Vol. 45, pp. 4837-4843.<br />

Jerlström-Hultqvist, J. et al. (2010). Is human giardiasis caused by different Giardia species?<br />

Gut Microbes. Vol.1, pp.379-382.<br />

Kulda, J.; Nohýnková, E. (1995). Giardiasis in humans and animals. In: Parasitic protozoa.<br />

KREIER, J.P., Academic Press, pp.225-422, San Diego.<br />

Malčeková, B. et al. (2010). Seroprevalecne of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi and<br />

Encephalitozoon intestinalis in humans and animals. Res. Vet. Sci., Vol.89, pp.358-361.<br />

Lallo, M.A. et al. (2002). Infecção experimental pelo Encephalitozoon cuniculi em camundongos<br />

imunossuprimidos com dexametasona. Rev. Saúde Pública, Vol.36, pp.621-626.<br />

Lallo, M.A.; Bondan, E.F. (2005). Experimental meningoencephalomyelitis by Encephalitozoon<br />

cuniculi in cyclophosphamide-immunosuppressed mice. Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr.,<br />

Vol.63, pp.246-251.<br />

Lallo M.A. et al. (2009). Ocorrência de Giardia, Cryptosporidium e microsporídios em animais<br />

silvestres em área de desmatamento no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Ciência Rural,<br />

Vol.39, pp.1465-1470.<br />

47


48<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Marquardt, W.C. et al. (2000). Parasitology & vector biology. Haucourt Academic Press, pp.<br />

205, San Diego.<br />

Mathis, A. (2000). Microsporidia emerging advances in understanding the basis biology of<br />

these unique organism. Int. J. Parasitol., Vol.30, pp.795-804.<br />

Méténier, G., Vivarès, P. (2001). Molecular characteristics and physiology of micrsporidia.<br />

Microbes and Infection, Vol. 3, pp.407-415.<br />

Mohammed Mahdy, A.K. et al. (2008). Risk factors for endemic giardiasis: highlighting the<br />

possible association of contaminated water and food. Trans R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.,<br />

Vol.102, pp.465-470.<br />

Monis, P.T.; Thompson, R.C.A. (2003). Cryptosporidium and Giardia-zoonoses: fact or fiction?<br />

Infect. Genet. Evol., Vol.3, pp.233-244.<br />

Patz, J.A. et al. (2000). Effects of enviromental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int. J.<br />

Parasitol., Vol.30, pp.1394-1405.<br />

Pereira, A. et al. (2009). Ocorrência de microsporídios em pequenos mamíferos silvestres no<br />

Estado de São Paulo. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., Vol.61, pp.1474-1477.<br />

Plutzer, J.; Karanis, P. (2009). Genetic polymorphism in Cryptosporidium species: an update.<br />

Vet. Parasitol., Vol.165, pp.187-199.<br />

Robinson, G. et al. (2010). Re-description of Cryptosporidium cuniculus Inman and Takeuchi,<br />

1979 (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae): morphology, biology and phylogeny.<br />

Intern. J. Parasitol., Vol.40, pp.1539-1548.<br />

Rodriguez-Tovar, L.E. (2011). Fish microsporidia: Immune response, immunomodulation<br />

and vaccination. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, Vol.30, pp.999-1006.<br />

Smith, H.V. et al. (2007). Cryptosporidium and Giardia as foodborne zoonoses. Vet. Parasitol.,<br />

Vol.149, pp.29-40.<br />

Slifko, T.R. et al. (2000). Emerging parasite zoonoses associated with water and food. Int. J.<br />

Parasitol., Vol.30, pp.1379-1393.<br />

Theiller, M.; Breton, J. (2008). Enterocytozoon bieneusi in human and animals, focus on<br />

laboratory identification and molecular epidemiology. Parasite, Vol.15, pp.349-58.<br />

Thompson, R.C.A. (2000). Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic<br />

potential. Int. J. Parasitol., Vol.30, pp.1259-1267.<br />

Thompson, R.C.A. et al. (2008). The public health and clinical significance of Giardia and<br />

Cryptosporidium in domestic animals. Vet. J., Vol.177, pp.18-25.<br />

Thompson, R.C.A. et al. (2009). Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: emerging issues. Int. J.<br />

Environ. Res. Public., Vol.6, pp.678-693.<br />

Volotão, A.C. et al. (2007). Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from human and animal samples<br />

from Brazil using beta-giardin gene: a phylogenetic analysis. Acta Trop., Vol.102,<br />

pp.10-19.<br />

Weber, R. et al. (2002). Human microsporidial infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., Vol.7, pp.426-61.<br />

Weiser, J. (2005). Microsporidia and the society for the invertebrate pathology: A personal<br />

point of view. J. Invert. Pathol., Vol.89, pp.12-18<br />

Weiss, L.M. (2001). Microsporidia: emerging pathogenic protist. Acta Trop., Vol.78, pp.89-102.<br />

Xiao, L. (2002). Host adaptation and host-parasite co-evolution in Cryptosporidium:<br />

implications for taxonomy and public health. Int. J. Parasitol., Vol.32, pp.1773-1785.<br />

Xiao, L.; Fayer, R. (2008). Molecular characterization of species and genotypes of<br />

Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Int. J.<br />

Parasitol., Vol.38, pp.1239-1255.<br />

Xiao, L. (2010). Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Experimental<br />

Parasitol., Vol.124, pp.80-89.


1. Introduction<br />

Impact of Deforestation<br />

on the Sustainability of Biodiversity<br />

in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

Vani Starry Manoharan 1, John Mecikalski 2,<br />

Ronald Welch 2 and Aaron Song 2<br />

1 <strong>Environment</strong>al Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne<br />

2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville,<br />

USA<br />

Tropical rain forests play an essential role in housing global biodiversity, and they<br />

accommodate more than 50% of all species in the world while occupying only ~10% of the<br />

surface land of the Earth [Myers, 1992; Pimm, 2001]. However, during the last 10,000 years<br />

humans have significantly influenced land surface characteristics by altering the vegetation<br />

to include plant species more suitable for their consumption, a process that includes<br />

converting forests to agricultural lands, livestock grazing, and building settlements [DeFries<br />

et al., 2004]. Current rates of deforestation are extremely high and are known to have<br />

significant impact on regional and global atmospheric and climate changes [Laurence et al.,<br />

2004] in addition to the direct local effects of deforestation. The scale and speed of global<br />

habitat loss and fragmentation is alarming, with only about half of the pre-industrial forest<br />

areas remaining as forests. These forest fragments are becoming the only refuge for most of<br />

the global tropical wildlife, but as these habitats fragment into smaller and smaller pieces<br />

and become more isolated, local extinction rates accelerate [Bennett, 1999].<br />

Central America or Mesoamerica, which occupies only 0.5% of the global land area, provides<br />

habitat for more than 7% of the world’s species [Mittermeier et al., 2000]. This region has a<br />

population growth rate of > 2% per year with high levels of poverty, unsustainable<br />

exploitation of natural resources, soil erosion and one of the world's highest rates of<br />

deforestation, losing 2.1% of forests/year [FAO, 1999]. This scale and speed of habitat loss and<br />

forest fragmentation in one of the earth's biologically richest regions has led conservationists to<br />

propose the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor (MBC) project, an integrated regional initiative<br />

intended to conserve biological and ecosystem diversity in a manner that also provides<br />

sustainable economic development [Carr et al., 1994; Miller et al., 2001].<br />

The MBC is an ambitious effort intended to connect large existing isolated parks, forest<br />

fragments and reserves with new protected areas through an extensive network of<br />

biological corridors within the five southern states of Mexico and the Central American<br />

countries (Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama).<br />

The intent is to establish an environment that provides better prospects for the long-term<br />

survival of the native species, provides migratory pathways for the others, and addresses<br />

4


50<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

the region’s socioeconomic needs. This would stem and reverse the erosion of biodiversity<br />

in the existing forest fragments in Mesoamerica. Ideally these proposed connecting corridors<br />

would contain the biological communities that were originally present. However, most of<br />

the current and proposed connecting corridors do not contain their original forest, but are<br />

instead occupied by agricultural landscapes containing croplands, grassland and various<br />

forms of degraded woodlands. Additionally, these regions have a varied topography of<br />

altitudes ranging between sea level and 3000 m. The topography and land characteristics of<br />

the corridors vary widely, from lowlands to high mountain peaks and dense-forest regions<br />

to croplands and woodlands respectively. The establishment of fully functional corridors<br />

will depend upon the regrowth of forests in many areas. However, the extent of<br />

deforestation within Central America may already have had climatic consequences that<br />

affect the stability and sustainability of currently protected areas and the proposed corridor<br />

regions [Laurence et al., 2004].<br />

Fig. 1. The map of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor.<br />

According to the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) 3 rd Assessment report<br />

[IPCC, 2001], there are high chances of adverse impacts on the existing natural global<br />

ecosystems, biodiversity and food supply due to the projected climate changes in the future.


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

Observations show that there have been decreases in frog population and other small<br />

mammals that may be related to climate change [IPCC, 2001].<br />

Previous studies show that changes in land use impact regional climate which in turn may<br />

enhance and sustain these changes [Hansen et al., 2001; Hansen and Rotella, 2002; DeFries et al.,<br />

2002]. Deforestation changes the surface energy budgets and generally decreases latent heat<br />

(LH) fluxes from surface to the atmospheric boundary layer and increases the sensible heat<br />

(SH) fluxes [Lawton et al., 2001; Nair et al., 2003; Ray et al., 2006]. The net result is hotter and<br />

drier air over the deforested and forested regions leading to increased dryness. However<br />

due to the continuous deforestation throughout Central America, there is concern about the<br />

long-term stability and even the sustainability of the MBC. This chapter is built upon studies<br />

to understand the environmental stability of forests in the corridors and their surroundings.<br />

The map of the proposed MBC is shown in Figure 1. The regions in red color in the map are<br />

the proposed corridor regions. National parks and protected areas are shown in green color.<br />

The extractive reserves shown in brown color are proposed for conservation. Some hunting<br />

and logging are permitted in these reserves. However, loggings in the extractive reserves are<br />

followed by reforestation. The guiding rules for the extractive reserves vary from country to<br />

country, but the basic requirement of reforestation is the same.<br />

There are 600 protected areas as a part of the MBC network [Herrera, 2003]. The number and<br />

percent of territory covered by these protected areas are given in Table 1.<br />

Country<br />

Number of protected<br />

areas<br />

% of territory covered by the<br />

protected areas<br />

Southern Mexico 33 18.8%<br />

Belize 59 44.8%<br />

Guatemala 104 26.3%<br />

El Salvador 3 1.6%<br />

Honduras 106 19.0%<br />

Nicaragua 76 21.7%<br />

Costa Rica 151 24.6%<br />

Panama 69 29.5%<br />

Table 1. The number of protected areas in each territory and the percentage of area covered<br />

by them.<br />

According to Central American Protected Areas System (SICAP), 29 percent of the protected<br />

areas which had been legally designated by 1998 cover less than 1,000 hectares and 67<br />

percent of protected areas cover less than 10,000 hectares. Only 22 are larger than 100,000<br />

hectares and only four of these cover more than 500,000 hectares.<br />

2. Impact of deforestation on regional hydrometeorology<br />

The clearing of forest results in an immediate reduction of intercepted water storage<br />

capacity followed by a decrease in interception and transpirational loss of water to the<br />

atmosphere [Swift et al., 1975; Eshleman, 2004]. This is in turn followed by increase in runoff<br />

and/or overall decrease in water yield capacity [Whitehead and Robinson, 1993]. Further,<br />

deforestation leads to decrease in the water storage capacity of the soil [Shukla et al., 1990] as<br />

well as the fraction of available soil moisture [Ray et al., 2003; Manoharan et al., 2009].<br />

Additionally, the deforestation reduces the overall roughness of the surface [Gash and Nobre,<br />

51


52<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

1997] and increases the albedo above the region [Costa et al., 2007]. These factors have high<br />

impact on the aridity of these places. Moreover, deforestation leads to warming in the<br />

Tropics and cooling in the temperate regions [Bonan, 2004]. The changes in temperature can<br />

range from a couple of degrees to tens of degrees Celsius [Gash and Nobre, 1997; Ray et al.,<br />

2003; Manoharan et al., 2009]. Thus, deforestation changes land cover. Thus influencing the<br />

albedo, surface temperature, soil fertility, surface roughness, soil moisture and changes in<br />

the magnitude of thermal energy (LH and SH) fluxes. The above changes, in turn, influence<br />

the regional boundary layer depth, cloudiness, cloud optical properties and local rainfall<br />

[Nair et al., 2003; Ray et al., 2003; Pielke, 2001]. In a stable atmosphere the clouds tend to form<br />

earlier over the moist surfaces, whereas in a less stable environment, the clouds tend to form<br />

earlier over the drier surfaces [Wetzel et al., 1996]. In a forested region the boundary layer air<br />

tends to be moister than in a deforested region. An average difference of 1g kg -1 difference<br />

in specific humidity has been observed between the forested and deforested forests in the<br />

Amazon [Bastable et al., 1993]. Pielke [2001] provides a detailed review of the influence of<br />

vegetation and soil characteristics on cumulus cloud formation and precipitation, and notes<br />

in particular that the alteration in heat fluxes as a result of deforestation modifies the<br />

convective activity by modifying the environment for thunderstorms, which are an effective<br />

conduit of heat, moisture, and momentum to higher latitudes and exerts major impacts on<br />

global weather and climate.<br />

MBCs are regions of contrasting vegetation types such as forests adjacent to deforested<br />

regions. There are several observational and modeling studies [Segal et al., 1988; Avissar and<br />

Liu, 1996; Weaver and Avissar, 2001] that have shown that such contrasting vegetation types<br />

lead to differential heating which in turn results in sea-breeze-like mesoscale circulations<br />

that increase cloudiness. Avissar and Liu [1996] noted that the updrafts created by surface<br />

heterogeneity are much stronger than those created as a result of mechanical turbulence.<br />

Climatic feedbacks from deforestation can also alter rainfall patterns, initially increasing<br />

[Avissar et al., 2002] then followed by drastic decreases in precipitation [Avissar et al., 2004].<br />

For example, Lyons et al. [1993] showed that in southwest Australia a substantial clearing of<br />

native vegetation led to a 20% decrease in local winter rainfall. Also Ray et al. [2003] in their<br />

study over western Australia along the bunny fence (a rabbit proof fence running 750 km<br />

separating the native vegetation from the farmland) area observed a higher frequency of low<br />

level cumulus cloud cover over the native vegetation side than over the farmland. The land<br />

use changes led to differences in soil moisture availability and hence the surface energy<br />

fluxes which in turn enhanced the cumulus cloudiness over the native vegetation than the<br />

agricultural land. However other studies by Otterman [1990], Sud et al. [1993], Pielke et al.<br />

[1998] show that deforestation leads to decreases in rainfall. Since the mid 1970s, tropical<br />

forest regions have experienced declines in precipitation at a rate of 1.0±0.8 % per decade<br />

with sharp declines in northern Africa (3 % to 4 %/decade), marginal declines over Asia,<br />

and no significant trend in Amazonia.<br />

Forest clearing tends to increase SH fluxes and reduce LH fluxes. This, in turn, causes the<br />

development of deeper turbulent convective boundary layers, with widespread cumulus<br />

clouds more likely to occur over the deforested regions than over the pristine forests (e.g.,<br />

Avissar et al., [2002]). Tendencies of increased convective available potential energy (CAPE),<br />

increased updraft widths and increased cloud base heights also have been reported (e.g., Negri<br />

et al., [2004]). CAPE is a measure of the energy available for convection. It is directly related to<br />

the vertical speed of the updrafts and thus higher values of CAPE indicate greater potential for<br />

severe weather. In tropical soundings, parcel temperatures of 1 to 2 K excesses may occur at a


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

depth of 10 - 12 km. A typical value of CAPE is then 500 Jkg -1. However, for a mid-latitude<br />

thunderstorm environment, the value of CAPE often may exceed 1000 Jkg -1, and in severe<br />

weather cases it may exceed 5000 Jkg -1. This small value of CAPE in the tropical environment<br />

is the major reason that the updraft velocities in tropical cumulonimbus are observed to be<br />

much smaller than those in mid-latitude thunderstorms [Holton, 2004].<br />

Convective activity is strongly influenced by surface characteristics, with changes in land<br />

cover producing changes in local surface temperatures and precipitation rates. From satellite<br />

observations Rabin et al. [1990] and Cutrim et al. [1995] reported increased cloudiness over<br />

deforested areas in Amazonia and attributed this to land surface heterogeneity. Using GOES<br />

(Geostationary Operational <strong>Environment</strong>al Satellite), TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring<br />

Mission) and Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) satellite data, Negri et al. [2004]<br />

found that enhanced dry season surface heating created a thermal circulation which<br />

increased shallow cumulus clouds, and the precipitation resulting from deep convection<br />

over deforested relative to those over forested regions in Amazonia. However, observations<br />

are not entirely consistent. Based upon ten years of 3-hourly infrared window channel<br />

observations taken during the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)<br />

over a 2.5ºx2.5 o grid, Durieux et al. [2003] reported no significant differences in dry season<br />

cloud cover between forested and deforested regions of Amazonia.<br />

Modeling studies likewise are inconsistent. Eltahir [1996] reported that large-scale<br />

deforestation could weaken large-scale circulation patterns which would lead to reduced<br />

rainfall. At the mesoscale, Eltahir and Bras [1994] reported that deforestation will lead to a<br />

reduction in precipitation, but would have no effect on large-scale circulations. However, at<br />

small scales on the order of 10-100 km, Wang et al. [2000] reported that the organization of<br />

rainfall reflects land cover patterns and that there is enhanced cumulus cloud cover and<br />

enhanced deep convection over deforested patches. As expected they found no relationship<br />

between shallow clouds and land cover patterns in the wet season. During the period between<br />

the dry and wet seasons, they suggested that deforestation may enhance afternoon cloudiness<br />

while contributing nothing to precipitation. However, during the dry season they found that<br />

the organization of rainfall does reflect land cover patterns, with enhanced shallow cumulus<br />

over deforested patches leading to enhanced deep convection. In contrast recent modeling<br />

studies by Costa et al. [2007] and Sampaio et al. [2007] came to divergent results. In these studies<br />

Amazonian forest was replaced by pasture and soybeans. Costa et al. [2007] used the<br />

Community Climate Model coupled to the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (CCM3-IBIS)<br />

climate model on a 2.81 o grid and Sampaio et al. [2007] used the Centro de Previsao do Tempoe<br />

Estudos Climaticos do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (CPTEC-INPE) global model<br />

at 2 o spatial resolution. Both results showed that replacement of forest by pasture leads to<br />

higher values of albedo, SH flux, and surface temperature with decreased values of roughness,<br />

turbulence, Leaf Area Index (LAI), root depth, LH flux, evapotranspiration, cloud cover and<br />

precipitation. Intriguingly, precipitation was decreased even further as pasture was replaced<br />

by soybeans. This was attributed to the albedo of soybean plantation being higher than that of<br />

the pasture. Sampaio et al. [2007] found that cloud cover was significantly decreased by about<br />

12% over deforested areas converted to pastures and by about 16% for soybean croplands,<br />

while precipitation decreased by 18% over pastures and 25% over soybeans. However, these<br />

studies utilized synoptic-scale grids that may not be representative of smaller-scale processes.<br />

Indeed, Sampaio et al. [2007] suggested that fragmented forest patches may create local<br />

circulations which in turn may enhance precipitation over the deforested regions. Table 2<br />

summarizes the above discussed literature survey.<br />

53


54<br />

S.N. Reference<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Otterman,<br />

1990<br />

Rabin et al.,<br />

1990<br />

Lyons et al.,<br />

1993<br />

Eltahir and<br />

Bras, 1994<br />

Cutrim et al.,<br />

1995<br />

Avissar and<br />

Liu, 1996<br />

Data & Study<br />

Area<br />

Landsat, Israel<br />

AVHRR from<br />

NOAA-7,<br />

Oklahoma<br />

Field<br />

experiments,<br />

AVHRR,<br />

Southwestern<br />

Australia<br />

Amazonia<br />

GOES,<br />

Amazonia<br />

RAMS<br />

7 Eltahir, 1996 Amazonia<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

Rabin and<br />

Martin, 1996<br />

Pielke et al.,<br />

1998<br />

Wang et al.,<br />

2000<br />

Weaver and<br />

Avissar 2001<br />

GOES, Central<br />

United States<br />

RAMS, South<br />

Florida<br />

MM5V2,<br />

Rondônia,<br />

Amazonia<br />

RAMS, ARM-<br />

CART, US<br />

Central Plains<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Key conclusions/Remarks<br />

Afforestation leads to reduced surface<br />

albedo and reduced soil heat flux and hence<br />

increases in precipitation.<br />

Clouds form earliest over regions of high SH<br />

and high albedo and are suppressed over<br />

regions of high LH fluxes. Convection<br />

enhancement at mesoscale results due to<br />

land surface heterogeneity.<br />

Substantial clearing of native vegetation lead<br />

to a 20% decrease in local winter rainfall.<br />

Cumulus cloud frequency is thus high over<br />

areas with high LH fluxes and high CAPE.<br />

Small scale deforestation (~250 km) may<br />

lead to reduction in precipitation, but would<br />

have no effect on large-scale circulations.<br />

Enhanced dry season cumulus clouds<br />

frequency over forest cleared regions.<br />

Contrasting vegetation types lead to<br />

differential heating which in turn results in<br />

sea-breeze-like mesoscale circulations that<br />

increase cloudiness. Updrafts created by<br />

surface heterogeneity are much stronger<br />

than those created as a result of turbulence.<br />

Large-scale deforestation (~2500 km) could<br />

weaken large-scale circulation patterns<br />

which would lead to reduced rainfall.<br />

Slightest change in elevation can modulate<br />

the cumulus cloud frequency. And cumulus<br />

frequency is inversely associated with plant<br />

cover and available soil moisture.<br />

During the past 100 years 11% decrease in<br />

summer deep cumulus rainfall due to land<br />

cover change and this climate change is<br />

irreversible due to permanent land cover<br />

change.<br />

At scales of 10 km observed enhanced cloud<br />

cover and enhanced and enhanced deep<br />

convection over deforested patches during<br />

dry season.<br />

Enhancement in mesoscale convection<br />

arising due to land cover heterogeneity.


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

S.N. Reference<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

Avissar et al.,<br />

2002<br />

Ray et al.,<br />

2003<br />

Durieux et al.,<br />

2003<br />

Nair et al.,<br />

2003<br />

Malhi and<br />

Phillips, 2004<br />

Negri et al.,<br />

2004<br />

Ray et al.,<br />

2006<br />

Costa et al.,<br />

2007<br />

Sampaio et al.,<br />

2007<br />

Nepstad et al.,<br />

2002<br />

Data & Study<br />

Area<br />

Satellite<br />

observations<br />

and Model<br />

simulations,<br />

Amazonia<br />

ASTER,<br />

MODIS, GMS5,<br />

Southwestern<br />

Australia<br />

ISCCP, GPCP,<br />

TRFIC,<br />

Amazonia<br />

GOES 8,<br />

Landsat MSS,<br />

RAMS, Costa<br />

Rica<br />

Tropics<br />

TRMM &<br />

SSMI,<br />

Southwest<br />

Brazil<br />

MODIS, GOES,<br />

RAMS,<br />

Guatemala<br />

CCM3-IBIS<br />

climate model<br />

(2.8o), Amazonia<br />

CPTEC-INPE<br />

(2o), Amazonia<br />

Brazil’s<br />

Tapajo´s<br />

National<br />

Forest, in eastcentral<br />

Amazonia<br />

Key conclusions/Remarks<br />

Climatic feedbacks from deforestation can<br />

also alter the rainfall patterns, initially<br />

increasing followed by drastic decrease in<br />

precipitation.<br />

High frequency of cumulus cloud cover over<br />

regions of high LH heat flux and high<br />

available energy.<br />

More wet season rainfall in deforested<br />

regions and less dry season rainfall than the<br />

forested regions.<br />

Deforestation leads to warmer, drier air<br />

upwind of the mountain and increasing the<br />

cloud base heights.<br />

Since mid 1970s, significant decline in<br />

precipitation at a rate of 1.0±0.8 % per<br />

decade with sharp decline in northern Africa<br />

(3 to 4 %/decade), marginal declines over<br />

Asia, and no significant trend in Amazonia.<br />

During dry season there is enhanced<br />

shallow cumulus cloudiness and deep<br />

convection over deforested areas than dense<br />

forests.<br />

High frequency of cumulus cloud cover,<br />

high rainfall rate over drier deforested areas<br />

than pristine forests.<br />

Forests to pasture lead to reduced cloud<br />

cover and rainfall; forest to soybean lead to<br />

increase in albedo and further decrease in<br />

cloud cover and precipitation.<br />

Observed similar to Costa et al. [2007].<br />

The forest leaves were quite tolerant to the<br />

soil moisture reduction provoked by<br />

throughfall exclusion. Instead of a pulse of<br />

leaf shedding, the exclusion treatment have<br />

inhibited the formation of new leaves,<br />

leading to a decline in fine litter production<br />

and, eventually, a thinning of the leaf<br />

canopy.<br />

Table 2. Literature survey on satellite remote sensing and modeling studies of impact on<br />

land cover change on regional cumulus cloud cover and precipitation.<br />

55


56<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Other significant and indirect impacts of land use changes include loss of spiritual and<br />

cultural benefits from ecosystems, both for the indigenous people and others enjoying<br />

recreational opportunities [Ramakrishnan, 2001]. Deforestation could also result in disease<br />

emergence [Patz et al., 2000; Patz et al., 2004] such as dengue and malaria [Tauil, 2001],<br />

diarrhea [De Souza et al., 2001] and other respiratory diseases [D’Amato et al., 2001].<br />

3. Impact of deforestation on flora and fauna due to hydrometeorological<br />

disturbances<br />

Temperature, precipitation, wind/storms, solar radiation, long-wave radiation, atmospheric<br />

concentration of carbon dioxide and ozone influence biogeochemical cycles, greenhouse gas<br />

fluxes and surface energy balance, which in turn impact the biodiversity of ecosystems.<br />

Species tend to be attracted to their optimum climate. Therefore, if temperature and<br />

precipitation changes, species would be expected to either expand or contract their range<br />

depending on favored conditions [Peters and Darling, 1985; Ford, 1982].<br />

Forests that are undisturbed tend to be dark under the canopy, humid, with stable<br />

temperature, and light wind [Laurence et al., 2002]. Deforestation creates forest edges with<br />

increased temperatures, reduced humidity and increased sunlight. This “edge effect” can<br />

penetrate 40 to 60 m deep in the forest [Kapos, 1989; Didham and Lawton, 1999]. These changes<br />

in the hydrometeorology parameters impact the flora and fauna found in the forest<br />

fragments. Many tropical animals require large areas of native vegetation for their survival,<br />

and isolation of forest fragments impacts their survival due to lack of water and food.<br />

Studies by Dale et al. [1994] over the tropical forests show that some species in small and<br />

isolated patches of forests do not cross even relatively small deforested areas. The survival<br />

of species in isolated forest patches strongly depends on suitable habitats of sufficient spatial<br />

extent to support their population. Decreases in the movement of animals across an<br />

ecosystem can limit/reduce the nutrient exchange between forest patches [Saunders, 1991].<br />

For plants, hydrometeorological changes are impacted by decreased evapotranspiration,<br />

and soil moisture depletion. Fragmented forests are more vulnerable to lateral shear force<br />

exerted by increased wind speed, turbulence and vorticity [Bergen, 1985; Miller et al., 2001].<br />

This increases the mortality rate of trees and damage within 100 to 300 m of the edges of<br />

forest fragments [Ferreira and Laurence, 1997; Laurence et al., 1998]. Laurence et al. [2000] found<br />

that in Amazonia trees die three times faster near the edges than those at the interior. Some<br />

trees simply drop leaves and die at the forest edges due to sudden changes in temperature,<br />

moisture and sunlight [Lovejoy et al., 1986; Sizer and Tanner, 1999]. Tree mortality impacts<br />

canopy dynamics [Ferreira and Laurance, 1997], which in turn alters forest structure,<br />

composition and diversity. New trees growing near the edges adapt to the new<br />

environment, but these are dissimilar to the forest-interior trees [Viana et al., 1997]. Thus,<br />

rare and localized species whose range becomes unsuitable tend to be threatened to<br />

extinction unless dispersion and colonization is possible.<br />

4. Outline of this study<br />

Although there are many studies as discussed above [Table 2], from both observations and<br />

models [Negri et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2000; Costa et al., 2007; Sampaio et al., 2007] to quantify<br />

the impact of deforestation on regional weather and climate, many of these studies<br />

exclusively focus on large homogeneous, pristine forests of Amazonia that were replaced by


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

farmlands and pastures. The results presented in the literature are not only inconsistent, but<br />

in many cases are opposing in their conclusions. Furthermore, it is unknown to what degree<br />

results reached for large, relatively homogeneous regions such as Amazonia are applicable<br />

to small regions with strong oceanic contributions to weather and climate.<br />

Ray et al. [2006] utilized satellite observations and regional atmospheric model simulations<br />

in Guatemala and adjacent areas and reported that deforestation locally intensifies the dry<br />

season, increasing the risk of fire along the long corridor regions connecting the protected<br />

areas. They showed that the deforested habitats in dry season have higher day-time<br />

temperatures, less cloud cover, less soil moisture and low values of Normalized Difference<br />

Vegetation Index (NDVI) than the forests in the same life zone.<br />

A detailed analysis of the climate parameters, such as change in land cover, surface<br />

temperature, NDVI, soil moisture, albedo, cloud formation, and precipitation over the<br />

protected reserves and the corridors connecting these reserves for different seasons, is<br />

required to determine the regions in the MBC that are potentially “stable” and “unstable.”<br />

This research work examines these issues in detail over samples of forested and deforested<br />

regions in Guatemala and the stability and sustainability of the MBCs in the region. analyzes<br />

whether relatively small-scale forested regions adjacent to deforested regions in Guatemala<br />

create meaningful differences in convective initiation and precipitation, which would be of<br />

importance to the sustenance of the proposed MBC.<br />

5. Study area<br />

Figure 1 shows the parks, reserves and protected regions within the study area along with<br />

the narrow corridors proposed to connect patches of similar habitat. The largest protected<br />

region is the Maya Biosphere Reserve in the northern Petén region which contains more<br />

than a million hectares of tropical forest. Cochrane [2003] showed that long corridors with<br />

long perimeters relative to their area may be particularly threatened by fire because forest<br />

edges usually are drier and more vulnerable. Ray et al. [2006] suggested that deforestation<br />

may be lengthening and locally intensifying the dry season which would adversely impact<br />

second-growth forest regeneration.<br />

Guatemala is composed of the mountainous highlands, the Pacific coast region south of the<br />

highlands and the hot, humid tropical and relatively flat Petén lowlands to the north.<br />

Approximately one-third of Guatemala is forested with about half of that total is composed<br />

of primary forests. The choice of this site is dictated in part because Ray et al. [2006] showed<br />

that at the height of the dry season (March), many of the forests in the Petén region have<br />

estimated rainfall deficits of up to 25mm which would have potentially serious<br />

consequences for the corridor regions. The Ray et al. [2006] results were generated from<br />

cloud cover rainfall regression statistics, and a more extensive analysis of the region is<br />

necessary to estimate the potential vulnerability of the proposed MBC corridors.<br />

6. Model<br />

The GEMRAMS atmosphere-vegetation coupled model [Eastman et al., 2001; Beltrán 2005;<br />

Beltrán et al., 2008] was used for the modeling experiments. It is comprised of the Colorado<br />

State University Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) 4.3 [Pielke et al., 1992;<br />

Cotton et al., 2003] and the General Energy and Mass Transport Model [GEMTM, Chen and<br />

Coughenour, 1994]. RAMS is a general-purpose, atmospheric simulation model that includes<br />

57


58<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

the equations of motion, heat, moisture and continuity in a terrain-following coordinate<br />

system. It is a fully three-dimensional and non-hydrostatic model. RAMS also includes a<br />

soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme, the Land Ecosystem-Atmosphere Feedback<br />

model, version 2 (LEAF-2) [Walko et al., 2000] that represents the storage and exchange of<br />

heat and moisture associated with the vegetation and canopy air and soil.<br />

GEMTM is an ecophysiological process-based model that can be used to simulate the<br />

dynamic interactions between the atmosphere and the growing canopy [Chen and<br />

Coughenour, 1994]. Several of the GEMTM components were coupled to RAMS: canopy<br />

radiation transfer, plant and root growth, soil water dynamics, biomass production and soil<br />

respiration submodels. These components require an additional set of parameters, mostly<br />

vegetation dependent, to characterize these biological processes.<br />

In GEMRAMS the near-surface atmosphere and biosphere are allowed to dynamically interact<br />

through the surface and canopy energy balance. Precipitation, canopy air and soil<br />

temperature, humidity, winds and surface LH and SH fluxes are computed by RAMS.<br />

Photosynthesis at the leaf-level is calculated for sunlit and shaded leaves as a function of<br />

photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and temperature. Water stress effect on the assimilation<br />

rate also is considered. At the canopy level, photosynthesis and conductance are calculated by<br />

scaling-up from the corresponding sunlit and shaded leaves using sunlit and shaded LAI<br />

using light extinction coefficients from a multi-level canopy radiation model [Goudriaan, 1977].<br />

The available photosynthate is allocated to leaves, stems, roots and reproductive organs with<br />

variable partition coefficients which are functions of soil water conditions. As water stress<br />

increases, the fraction allocated to root growth increases. The root profile is updated daily<br />

through the processes of branching, extension and death [Chen and Lieth, 1993].<br />

Cumulus parameterization in the model is accomplished using the Kain-Fritsch scheme<br />

[Kain and Fritsch, 1993]. GEMRAMS is a state-of-the-art soil-vegetation-atmospheric<br />

simulation approach which offers much increased realism in modeling complex forestdeforestation<br />

circulation patterns. The original GEMRAMS model was built based on RAMS<br />

v4.3. The RAMS model has evolved to the latest version v6.0, and one of the major<br />

improvements includes the use of independent satellite observations of vegetation<br />

greenness represented by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).<br />

6.1 Model configuration<br />

Two nested domains are used. The outer domain, with a horizontal grid of 40 km x 40 km<br />

and covering an area about 2000 km on a side, is centered at the point of 16.0N and -90.0W<br />

in Guatemala. This domain is used mainly to incorporate as much real-time weather as<br />

possible within the chosen regional scale domain. Real-time weather data are obtained from<br />

National Centers for <strong>Environment</strong>al Prediction Final gridded analysis datasets (NCEP FNL),<br />

which is global at 1 x 1 degree, 6-hourly. The inner domain in this study has a horizontal<br />

grid of 10 km x 10 km and covers an area of 620 km x 620 km, centered at the same point.<br />

The inner and outer domains are shown overlaid onto the map of vegetation types compiled<br />

from MODIS data by the University of Maryland in Figure 2a. Figure 2b shows the<br />

topography of the study region. The Petén study area is characterized by relatively low<br />

relief (< 300 m) and is bounded roughly from 16N to 18N and 89W to 91.5W.<br />

Thirty-five vertical levels are used in the model, with the lowest level 20 m from ground,<br />

increasing with a ratio 1.15 up to a maximum of 1200 m near the model top at 18.7 km. The<br />

fine vertical grid limited the model time step to 30 seconds for the outer and 10 seconds for


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

the inner domain. It is noted that the model was run with the “full” dynamic features<br />

(topography, various landscape features, etc.) over the two nested domains.<br />

Fig. 2. (a) The University of Maryland ecosystem map of Central America with outer and<br />

inner domains overlaid (red boxes), (b) The two nested domains used for model simulation<br />

shown over the topography map of Guatemala. The outer domain has a horizontal grid of<br />

40 km x 40 km and covering an area about 2000 km on a side and is centered at the point of<br />

16.0N and -90.0W in Guatemala. The inner domain has a horizontal grid of 10 km x 10 km<br />

and covers an area of 620 km x 620 km, centered at the same point. The major vegetation is<br />

the Evergreen Broadleaf Trees, which shows indeed a quite “smoothed” distribution.<br />

However, there are small-scale patchy, heterogeneous land covers which represent partial-<br />

or non-forested land covers.<br />

The northern half of the Petén region tends to be characterized by protected regions and<br />

tropical forests, while the southern and western regions are heavily deforested. LAI in these<br />

dense tropical rainforests are ~ 6 while values in the range of ~2 are associated with the<br />

small-scale, patchy, heterogeneous land surface conditions in the non-forested areas.<br />

Roughness heights are approximately 2 m in the forests and a few centimeters in the<br />

pastures. Albedo values of about 14% are taken for the forests and approximately 16.5% for<br />

the deforested regions.<br />

6.2 Soil initialization<br />

The model soil parameters are more difficult to initialize, due to the lack of satisfactory data<br />

in most regions. Reichle et al. [2004] discussed a three-way comparison regarding soil<br />

modeling (in-situ measurement, remote satellite observation, and numerical modeling) and<br />

pointed out that there is as yet no “consensus” among the three. In the current study, soil<br />

moisture is initialized using the NCEP FNL 2-layer soil data, in which vertical variation is<br />

incorporated into the model. Horizontally, the data over Guatemala is averaged. Soil<br />

temperature is initialized with “zero-offset” from the NCEP FNL lowest air temperature.<br />

Also, soil (3D) texture is initialized following the same procedure of LAI and vegetation<br />

fraction as provided by RAMS v6.0.<br />

59


60<br />

7. Model results<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The objective of this study is to determine environmental and climatic differences in<br />

forested and deforested regions in the lowland Petén region of Guatemala as well as<br />

circulation patterns both within these regions and along the borders. Large differences<br />

between the forested and deforested areas would support the hypothesis of Ray et al. [2006]<br />

who proposed that the proposed MBC corridors are potentially unstable.<br />

A 30-day simulation of the dry season is performed in the Petén region with the northern<br />

half forested and the southern half deforested. This is in rough agreement with the primarily<br />

forested conditions found in the northern Petén today and the largely deforested conditions<br />

found in the southern region.<br />

Figure 3 shows the model configuration of vegetation assumed in this study. The vertical<br />

north-south line (AB) through the center of the region at 90.25W shows the location at which<br />

most of the results are described. The horizontal east-west line through the center of the<br />

region at 17N divides the primarily evergreen broadleaf forested region to the north from<br />

the primarily deforested pasture region to the south.<br />

Fig. 3. Model Configuration: (a) Albedo of the Petén. (b) LAI field over the Petén on March<br />

8 th, 2003 (dry day) at 12 noon local time (1800 UTC). (c) and (d) Similar to (b) but for<br />

fractional vegetation cover and surface roughness factor respectively.<br />

Based upon satellite images of the Petén region, it is assumed that fractional vegetation<br />

cover is about 98% in the forested regions and about 70-75% in the deforested regions. As


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

seen in Figures 3 a, b, c and d the LAI is ~6 for the Evergreen Broadleaf Forests, surface<br />

roughness length is about 2m and surface albedo is about 14%. Note that once the<br />

vegetation type is chosen, the GEMRAMS model initializes the surface parameters. The<br />

value of 14% for the forests is consistent with satellite remote sensing estimates and the<br />

literature (e.g., Pielke, 1984, Table 11-8). Note that coniferous forests have much lower albedo<br />

on the order of ~10% and LAI values of 2-4, but these are not prevalent in the study region.<br />

In general, forests may have albedo values ranging from about 10% to 20%, depending upon<br />

forest type and season. Whereas, the LAI values for the deforested regions range from 1.5 -<br />

2.5 with very small roughness lengths (nearly zero) appropriate for pastures and with<br />

albedo ~ 16.5%.It is important to note that the GEMRAMS model is fully dynamic.<br />

Therefore, the surface parameters of albedo, LAI, fractional vegetation cover and roughness<br />

factor change over time in response to environmental conditions such as surface<br />

temperature, humidity and precipitation. However, for the short term study conducted here<br />

over a one month period, the surface parameters varied little.<br />

Within a typical dry season, there may be some days which are hot, dry and cloudless, others<br />

that have fair-weather cumulus and others that experience unstable atmospheric conditions,<br />

deep convection and heavy precipitation. Figure 4 shows daily precipitation averaged over the<br />

forested and deforested regions for March 2003. Note that there was no precipitation in first<br />

half of the month over both the regions. About a third of the days experienced small<br />

precipitation events such as showers, and about six of the days experienced unstable<br />

conditions with deep convection and heavy precipitation. The environmental conditions<br />

necessary for the formation of deep convection are destabilization of the air parcels and lifting<br />

the destabilized air to the level of free convection [Wallace and Hobbs, 2006]. The destabilization<br />

is associated with the lifting of the air parcel and the low level convergence influenced from<br />

large-scale forcings such as an extratropical cyclone, which are generally anticipated a day or<br />

more before. In this decade, 2003 was year of many extratropical cyclones. Central America<br />

was highly influenced by the troughs associated with the cold fronts coming from north [IPCC,<br />

2007].And the lifting of air parcels that initiates the deep convection is associated with<br />

localized, short-lived and less predictable forcings such as the sea-breeze or outflow of any<br />

pre-existing convective storms [Wallace and Hobbs, 2006].<br />

Figure 5a shows SH fluxes peak values tend to occur at 1400LT, which is the time of<br />

maximum convection on days in which it occurs. SH fluxes range in value from about 400-<br />

500 Wm -2 for about the first two weeks of March and then again on the dry days of 21-22<br />

March. SH flux decreased to about 300 Wm -2 on 16 March the day convective rains. Then<br />

slowly increasedas the ground dried out. The day of 23 March had strongly unstable<br />

conditions and heavy precipitation and SH fluxes < 200 Wm -2 with similar low values at the<br />

end of the month. Note that SH fluxes are within 10% of each other in the forested and<br />

deforested regions throughout this dry season on dry and convective days.<br />

Figure 5b shows the corresponding LH fluxes during this month at the same time of the day.<br />

LH fluxes range from < 200 Wm -2 on the very dry days to > 600 Wm -2 on the very convective<br />

days during the later half of March. High LH release associated with warm surface<br />

temperatures acts to maintain the horizontal temperature gradient thereby increasing the<br />

supply of potential energy to build up the deep convection [Wallace and Hobbs, 2006]. Note in<br />

particular that the LH fluxes are up to twice as large in the forested regions during the “dry”<br />

days.Differences in LH fluxes between the forested and deforested regions are much smaller<br />

during the convective days.<br />

61


62<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 4. Diurnal (hourly) precipitations for March 2003 averaged over forested and deforested<br />

regions.<br />

Fig. 5. (a) Diurnal (hourly) SH flux for March 2003 averaged over forested and deforested<br />

regions, (b) same as (a) but for LH flux.<br />

It might be expected that the forests with their larger LH fluxes would produce greater<br />

cloud cover on the drier days, but this is not found to be the case during this study period.<br />

The following case studies examine representative dry, showery and convective days,<br />

comparing conditions in the forested and deforested regions in each case.


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

7.1 Dry day<br />

Table 3a,b shows temperature, LH, SH, PBL height, precipitation and cloud cover for the<br />

south (pasture) and north (forest) sides for both a representative dry day (March 8) and a<br />

representative convective day (March 23) as a function of time (0600, 1000, 1200, 1400 and<br />

1800 LT). These are values averaged over each of the two sides, forest to the north and<br />

pasture to the south.<br />

a) Dry day Convective day<br />

Time Temperature<br />

(K)<br />

LH (Wm -2) SH (Wm -2) Temperature<br />

(K)<br />

LH (Wm -2) SH (Wm -2)<br />

Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest<br />

6am 296.18 293.69 12 8.23 12.47 15.31 299.11 297.57 100.95 31.87 14.44 49.56<br />

10am 305.92 303.56 163.96 54.02 309.58 439.61 302.12 299.42 618.114 719.05 87.52 47.08<br />

noon 310.49 306.44 37.61 149.31 471.17 485.66 302.73 300.89 670.557 476.62 122.63 82.4<br />

2pm 310.79 306.66 28.03 138.75 373.34 333.41 302.83 299.08 574.53 482.88 117.29 32.73<br />

6pm 303.73 300.45 0.5044 0.7795 7.12 -26.14 298.42 295.94 128.29 60.37 -5.57 -10.197<br />

b) Dry day Convective day<br />

Time Planetary<br />

Boundary layer<br />

(m)<br />

Precipitation<br />

(mm)<br />

Cloud Cover<br />

(%)<br />

Planetary Precipitation<br />

Boundary layer (mm)<br />

(m)<br />

Cloud Cover<br />

(%)<br />

Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest Pasture Forest<br />

6am 164.38 491.38 0.32 0.77 13.95 13.76 465.27 293.49 37.62 11.91 21.24 16.46<br />

10am 1104.23 1267.63 0.59 0.87 16.72 13.8 927.65 1199.39 44.97 15.58 34.17 22.68<br />

noon 1658.03 1811.46 0.59 0.87 13.85 13.76 1193.71 1456.6 50.73 18.12 33.08 22.49<br />

2pm 2017.77 2065.17 0.6 0.88 12.62 12.62 1272.75 1727.46 55.29 22.82 37.57 21.72<br />

6pm 1442.22 1088.76 0.6 0.88 10.88 12.14 834.66 994.18 61.39 25.52 20.67 18.85<br />

Table 3. Temperature (K), LH flux (Wm -2), SH flux (Wm -2), PBL height (m), precipitation<br />

(mm) and cloud cover (%) for the pasture (south) and forest (north) sides for dry day (March<br />

8 th, 2003) and convective day (March 23 rd, 2003) at 6 am, 10 am, 12 noon, 2 pm and 6 pm.<br />

Fig. 6. Spatial distribution of temperature at 2 m (K), SH flux and LH flux on the dry day<br />

(March 8 th, 2003) at 1400 LT<br />

63


64<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 7. Spatial distribution of temperature at 2 m (K), SH flux and LH flux at 1400 LT on the<br />

convective day (March 23 rd, 2003)<br />

For the dry day, Table 3a shows that temperature in the pasture is about 2K warmer than<br />

the forest in the early morning, increasing to about 4K warmer during mid-day. Indeed, the<br />

literature and the satellite observation studies discussed in Chapter 3 show that during dry<br />

season deforested regions tend to be hotter than forested ones in virtually all regions<br />

worldwide. Also we see that the values of LH and SH fluxes were very small in the early<br />

morning, with SH values approaching 500 Wm -2 in both pastures and forests by mid-day<br />

and then decreasing again by evening. Sensible heat values were relatively similar in both<br />

pastures and forests.<br />

Under these very dry conditions, values of LH from the pastures spiked to values of about<br />

160 Wm -2 in mid-morning (10am LT) due to “burnoff of early morning dew while forests<br />

had values only a third as large. By mid-day (noon LT) LH fluxes decreased to about 30<br />

Wm -2 in the deforested regions while values in forests increased to about 140 – 150 Wm -2.<br />

Note that during mid-day SH fluxes were about three times larger than the LH fluxes in<br />

both pastures and forests.<br />

Cloud cover ranged from about 12% to 14% over both regions during this dry day, and<br />

precipitation was minimal, averaging less than 1 mm in both regions. The PBL height was<br />


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

Under the relatively wet conditions of the convective day, a reversal in the behavior of the<br />

LH and SH fluxes is found, as compared to the dry day. On the convective day the SH fluxes<br />

are relatively small, in the range from 50 – 125 Wm -2 in both pastures and forests, while LH<br />

fluxes reached 600-700 Wm -2 in the late morning hours before decreasing somewhat during<br />

mid-day. Note that LH fluxes were significantly larger over pastures during mid-day than<br />

over forests and that SH fluxes were somewhat higher over pastures than forests.<br />

Cloud cover is significantly higher over pastures than over forests on the convective day, with<br />

values of about 23% over forests and up to 38% over pastures during the early afternoon.<br />

These differences in cloud cover also are reflected in differences in precipitation. The<br />

precipitation increased from about 12 mm in the early morning hours to about 25 mm by<br />

evening over the forests, an increase of about 13 mm during the day. However, precipitation<br />

increased from about 38 mm in the early morning over the pastures to about 61 mm by late<br />

afternoon, an increase of 23 mm during the day. Overall, precipitation was more than double<br />

over the pastures. On an average the rain rate of the forested region was 0.114 mm/hour and<br />

deforested region was 0.151 mm/hour. The results suggest that under sufficiently convective<br />

conditions, pastures generate significantly higher precipitation rates than do forests<br />

Fig. 8. Development of circulation patterns along the AB line shown in Figure 7 from early<br />

morning (6 am) to late afternoon (6 pm) on March 23rd, 2003 (convective day). The<br />

horizontal axis shows the latitude (in degrees) and the vertical axis is the height from the<br />

ground (in km). The red lines represent convective heating ( oC day-1) (solid line – heating<br />

and dashed line – cooling) and the green lines represent convective moistening (g kg<br />

(solid line – moistening and dashed line – drying).<br />

65<br />

-1day -1)<br />

The height of the PBL was higher over the pastures (~450 m) than over the forests (~300 m)<br />

in the early morning hours. By 1400 LT the PBL grew to about 1300 m over the pastures and<br />

to about 1700 m over the forests, a value only slightly smaller than during the dry


66<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

conditions. The height of the PBL over forested regions is not highly sensitive to wet and<br />

dry conditions. However, note that the height of the PBL over pastures is very sensitive to<br />

wet and dry conditions, reaching only 1275 m during the convective day.<br />

Figures 8a, b, c show the spatial pattern of surface temperature, SH and LH fluxes,<br />

respectively, at 1400 LT over the study region. On convective day we don’t clearly see the<br />

difference between the forest and the deforested regions spatial plots as seen on a dry day<br />

(Figure 7).<br />

7.3 Circulation patterns<br />

Figure 8 shows the development of circulation patterns along the line AB in Figure 7 from<br />

early morning to late afternoon on 23 rd March, the convective day. In the morning hours,<br />

there is early convective activity over the pastures, with cloud tops reaching about 9 km.<br />

Note that convection is found only over pastures and not over the forests in the early<br />

morning. By 1000 LT strong updraft regions are developing in the convective regions and<br />

cloud tops reach about 12 km in height. At this time convective activity is initiated over the<br />

forests near the forest-pasture boundary. By local noon convective activity is found over the<br />

entire region, both over pastures and forests, with cloud tops reaching 13-14 km. Note the<br />

regions of strong updraft. By 1400LT the forest regions have ceased convection along this<br />

AB line, although very strong convection with very large updrafts is found over the<br />

pastures. By late afternoon, convective activity is ceasing, but with isolated cells over both<br />

pastures and forests.<br />

Note that the cloud top heights are approximately the same over both pastures and forests.<br />

To examine the realism of these results, GOES infrared imagery was obtained for 23 March<br />

2003. Cloud top heights were examined over both forested and deforested regions, and there<br />

were no significant differences in the results (not shown). Once generated the convective<br />

clouds in all situations modeled have sufficient CAPE to reach the tropopause level.<br />

8. Discussion and conclusions<br />

High surface temperatures together with the troughs associated with the cold fronts coming<br />

from the north tend to destabilize the air. This together with the local sea-breeze increases<br />

the potential energy required for increasing convection. And as we see from the results,<br />

convective activity with precipitation starts from the mid of March 2003. This together with<br />

the prevailing high surface temperature destabilizes the air leading to more convective<br />

storms during the latter days of March 2003.<br />

During dry conditions LH fluxes are very low over both pastures and forests, and SH fluxes<br />

are a factor of three to ten times larger. PBL heights reach 2000 m during the heat of the day<br />

and there is minimal cloud cover on the order of 13% and virtually no precipitation for these<br />

dry conditions.<br />

A very different scenario occurs during wet convective conditions. Under these conditions<br />

convection is initiated early in the morning hours over the pastures and not over the forests.<br />

By mid-day convection is found over both pastures and forests, and by late afternoon<br />

convection decreases over both regions, but much more so over the forested regions. LH<br />

fluxes become very large (~700 Wm -2) and are five to ten times larger than the SH fluxes.<br />

Cloud cover over the forests increases to about 22% during mid-day but up to about 38%<br />

over the pastures. Overall, substantial precipitation rates of 61 mm were found over the


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

pastures compared to less than half this amount (~25 mm) for the forests. PBL heights are<br />

much lower over pastures than over forests.<br />

These results are consistent with Negri et al. [2004] who utilized GOES data for their<br />

Amazonia study, a wet region. Higher cloud covers and precipitation rates are found over<br />

deforested regions. Manoharan et al. [2010] also used GOES data and found higher cloud cover<br />

over deforested regions in Guatemala. However, note that such conditions of higher cloud<br />

cover and precipitation are found only under wet, convective conditions and are not found<br />

under dry conditions. Furthermore, the results are consistent with Wang et al. [2000] who<br />

reported deforestation can create mesoscale circulations with rising motions that trigger dry<br />

season moist convection. The present results clearly demonstrate that much strong convective<br />

circulations are created over pastures (deforested) regions than over forests.<br />

In terms of the sustainability of the lowland corridor regions in the proposed MBC, the<br />

results strongly suggest that forested corridors will experience warmer conditions due to<br />

higher temperatures in surrounding deforested areas. Also from the observational study by<br />

Manoharan et al. [2010], we see severe dryness and drought prevailing in the region during<br />

2003. However, by far the most important factor is precipitation. During the first half of the<br />

month, there is little or no rainfall, whereas, during the latter days of the month (March<br />

2003) we see significant convective activity over the region. This is the result of the increase<br />

in energy that initiates convection by increased SH release during the initial days of March<br />

and associated local-sea breeze. Thus, the forested corridors will receive higher than normal<br />

precipitation rates due to the fact that surrounding warmer deforested regions generate<br />

higher convective activity. The above scenario implies a “climate tipping point” will not<br />

occur in the proposed corridor regions within the lowland regions of Guatemala in the<br />

study area which would threaten their stability and sustainability.<br />

9. References<br />

Avissar, R., R. R. Da Silva, and D. Werth (2004), Implications of tropical deforestation for<br />

regional and global hydroclimate. In: Ecosystems and land use change, R. S. DeFries,<br />

G. P. Asner, and R. Houghton (eds.), AGU, Geophysical Mongraph 153, 73-83.<br />

Avissar, R., P. L. Silva Dias, M. A. Silva Dias and C. A. Nobre (2002), The Large Scale<br />

Biosphere Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA). Insights and future needs,<br />

J. Geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.129/2002JD002704.<br />

Avissar, R., and Y. Liu (1996), A three-dimensional numerical study of shallow convective<br />

clouds and precipitation induced by land-surface forcings, J. Geophys. Res., 101,<br />

7499– 7518.<br />

Bastable, H.G., W.J. Shuttleworth, R.L.G. Dallarosa, G. Fisch and C.A. Nobre (1993),<br />

Observations of climate albedo, and surface radiation over cleared and undisturbed<br />

Amazonian forest, Int. J. Climat, 13, 783-796.<br />

Beltrán-Przekurat, A., C. H. Marshall, and R. A. Pielke Sr. (2008), Ensemble reforecast of<br />

recent warm-season weather: impact of a dynamic vegetation parameterization, J.<br />

Geophys. Res., 113, D24116, doi:10.1029/2007JD009480.<br />

Beltrán, A. B. (2005), Using a coupled atmospheric-biospheric modeling system<br />

(GEMRAMS) to model the effects of land-use/land-cover changes on the nearsurface<br />

atmosphere, Ph.D. dissertation, 186 pp., Colorado State University, Fort<br />

Collins, CO.<br />

67


68<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Bennett, A. F. (1999), Linkages in the landscape: The role of corridors and connectivity in<br />

wildlife conservation, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.<br />

Bergen, J. D. (1985), Some estimates of dissipation from the turbulent velocity component<br />

gradients over a forest canopy. In: The forest-atmosphere interaction, B. A. Hutchinson<br />

and B. B. Hicks (eds.), 613-630, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, D. Reidel.<br />

Bonan, G. B. (2004), Biogeophysical feedbacks between land cover and climate. In:<br />

Ecosystems and land use change, R. S. DeFries, G. P. Asner, and R. Houghton (eds.),<br />

AGU, Geophysical Monograph 153, 61-72.<br />

Carr, M.H., Lambert, J.D., Zwick, P.D. (1994), Mapping of Continuous Biological Corridor<br />

Potential in Central America, Final Report, Paseo Pantera, University of Florida.<br />

Chen, D. X., and M. B. Coughenour (1994), GEMTM: A general model for energy and mass<br />

transfer of land surfaces and its application at the FIFE sites, Agric. For. Meteorol.,<br />

68, 145-171.<br />

Chen, D. X., and J. H. Lieth (1993), A two-dimensional, dynamic model for root growth<br />

distribution of potted plants, J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 118, 181–187.<br />

Cochrance, M. A. (2003), Fire science for rainforests, Nature, 421, 913-919.<br />

Costa, M. H., S. N. M. Yanagi, P. J. O. P. Souza, A. Ribeiro and E. J. P. Rocha (2007), Climate<br />

change in Amazonia caused by soybean cropland expansion, as compared to<br />

caused by pastureland expansion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07706,<br />

doi:10.1029/2007/GL029271.<br />

Cotton, W. R., et al., (2003), RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions, Meteor. Atmos.<br />

Phys, 82:5–29<br />

Coughlan, M, D. Jones, N. Plummer, A. Watkins, B. Trewin and S. Dawkins (2003), Impact<br />

of 2002-03 El Niño on Australian climate, Drought.com Workshop.<br />

Cutrim, E.D., W. Martin, and R. Rabin (1995), Enhancement of cumulus clouds over<br />

deforested lands in Amazonia, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 1801-1805.<br />

D’Amato, G., G. Liccardi, M. D’Amato and M. Cazzalo (2001), The role of outdoor air<br />

pollution and climatic changes on the rising trends in respiratory allergy, Respir.<br />

Med., 95, 606-611.<br />

Dale, V. H., S. M. Pearson, H. L. Otterman, and R. V. O’Neill (1994), Relating patterns of<br />

land-use change to faunal biodiversity in the Central Amazon, Conservation Biology,<br />

8, 1027-1036.<br />

DeFries, R. S., G. P. Asner, R. Houghton (2004), Trade-offs in land-use decisions: Towards a<br />

framework for assessing multiple ecosystem responses to land-use, In: Ecosystems<br />

and land use changes, R. S. DeFries, G. P. Asner, and R. Houghton (eds.), AGU,<br />

Geophysical Monograph 153, 1-9.<br />

DeFries, R.S., L. Bounoua and G.J. Collatz (2002), Human modification of the landscape and<br />

surface climate in the next fifty years, Glob. Chang. Biol., 8 (5), 438-458,<br />

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00483.x.<br />

De Souza, A. C., K. E. Petersont, E. Cufino, M. I. Do Amaral, and J. Gardner (2001),<br />

Underlying and proximate determinants of diarrhoea-specific infant mortality rates<br />

among municipalities in the state of Ceara, north-east Brazil: And ecological study,<br />

J. Biosocial Sciences, 33, 227-244.<br />

Didham, R. K., and J. J. Lawton (1999), Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes<br />

in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments, Biotropica, 31,<br />

17-30.


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

Durieux, L., L.A.T. Machado and H. Laurent (2003), The impact of deforestation on cloud<br />

cover over the Amazon arc of deforestation, Remote Sens. Environ., 86(1), 132-140(9),<br />

doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00095-6.<br />

Eltahir, E. A. B. (1996), Role of vegetation in sustaining large-scale atmospheric circulations<br />

in the Tropics, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 4255–4268.<br />

Eltahir, E. A. B., and R. L. Bras (1994), Sensitivity of regional climate to deforestation in the<br />

Amazon basin, Adv. Water Resour., 17, 101–115.<br />

Eastman J. L., M. B. Coughenour, and R. A. Pielke Sr. (2001), The regional effects of CO2 and<br />

landscape change using a coupled plant and meteorological model, Global Change<br />

Biol. 7: 797-815.<br />

Eshleman, K. N. (2004), Hydrological consequences of land use change: A review of the<br />

state-of-science. In: Ecosystems and land use changes, R. S. DeFries, G. P. Asner, and<br />

R. Houghton (eds.), AGU, Geophysical Monograph 153, 13-29.<br />

Ferreira, L. V., and W. F. Laurence (1997), Effects of forest fragmentation on mortality and<br />

damage of selected trees in central Amazonia, Conserv. Bio., 11, 797-801.<br />

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1999), State of the World's<br />

Forests 1999, FAO Forestry Program.<br />

Ford, M. J. (1982), The changing climate, London, George Allen and Unwin.<br />

Gash, J. H. C., and C. A. Nobre (1997), Climatic effect of Amazonian deforestation: Some<br />

results from ABRACOS, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 823– 830.<br />

Goudriaan, J (1977), Crop micrometeorology: A simulation study, Simulation Monographs,<br />

Pudoc, Wageningen, 249pp.<br />

Herrera (2003), Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Mesoamerica:<br />

environmental and developmental perspectives.<br />

Hansen, A. J. and J. J. Rotella (2002), Biophysical factors, land use and species viability in<br />

and around nature reserves, Conserv. Biol. 16, 1-12.<br />

Hansen, A. J., R. P. Neilson, V. Dale, C. Flather, L. Iverson, D. J. Currie, S. Shafer, R. Cook,<br />

and P. Bartlein (2001), Global change in forests: interactions among biodiversity,<br />

climate and land use, BioScience 51, 765-779.<br />

Holton, J. R. (2004), An Introduction to dynamic Meteorology, 4 th Edition, Elsevier<br />

Academic press.<br />

IPCC (2001), Climate change 2001: Synthesis report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,<br />

UK.<br />

IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to<br />

the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<br />

[Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and<br />

H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and<br />

New York, NY, USA<br />

Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch (1993), Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the<br />

Kain-Fritsch scheme, The representation of cumulus convection in numerical<br />

models, Meteor. Monogr., 46, 165-177.<br />

Kapos, V. (1989), Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian<br />

Amazon, J. Trop. Ecol., 5, 173-185.<br />

Laurence, W. F. (2004), Forest-climate interactions in fragmented tropical landscapes, Phil.<br />

Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 345-352, doi 10.1098/rstb.2003.1430.<br />

69


70<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Laurence, W. F., A. K. M. Albernaz, G. Schroth, P. M. Fearnside, E. Ventincinque, and C. Da<br />

Costa (2002), Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, J. Biogeogr. 29,<br />

737-748.<br />

Laurance, W.F., Delamonica, P., Laurance, S.G., Vasconcelos, H.L., Lovejoy, T.E., (2000),<br />

Conservation – rainforest fragmentation kills big trees, Nature, 404, 836.<br />

Laurence, W. F., L. V. Ferreira, J. Rankin-de Merona, and S. G. Laurence (1998), Rain forest<br />

fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities, Ecology, 79, 2032-<br />

2040.<br />

Lawton, R. O., U. S. Nair, R. A. Pielke and R. M. Welch (2001), Climate impact of tropical<br />

lowland deforestation on nearby montane cloud forests, Science, 294, 584-587.<br />

Lovejoy, T. E., R. O. Bierregaard, Jr., A. B. Rylands, J. R. Malcolm, C. E. Quintela, L. H.<br />

Harper, K. S. Brown, Jr., A. H. Powell, G. V. N. Powell, H. O. R. Schubart, and M. B.<br />

Hays (1986), Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments, 257-<br />

325 In: M. E. Soule (Editor), Conservation Biology: The science scarcity and<br />

diversity, Sinauer Associates, Mass.<br />

Lyons, T. J., P. Schwerdtfeger, J. M. Hacker, I. J. Foster, R. C. G. Smith, and H. Xinmei (1993),<br />

Land-atmosphere interaction in a semiarid region: The bunny fence experiment,<br />

Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1327–1334.<br />

Manoharan, V. S., R. M. Welch and R. O. Lawton (2009), Impact of deforestation on regional<br />

surface temperatures and moisture in the Maya lowlands of Guatemala, Geophys.<br />

Res. Lett., 36, L21701, doi: 10.1029/2009GL040818.<br />

Miller, K., E. Chang, N. Johnson (2001), Defining Common Ground for the Mesoamerican<br />

Biological Corridor. World Resources Institute, Wash, DC. 45 pp.<br />

Mittermeier, R.A., C. G. Mittermeier, N. Myers, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, J. Kent (2000),<br />

Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853.<br />

Nair, U.S., R.O. Lawton, R.M. Welch and R.A. Pielke Sr. (2003), Impact of land use on Costa<br />

Rican tropical montane cloud forests: sensitivity of cumulus cloud field<br />

characteristics to lowland deforestation, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D7), 4206,<br />

doi:10.1029/2001JD001135.<br />

Negri, A. J., R. F. Adler, L. Xu, J. Surratt (2004), The impact of Amazonian deforestation on<br />

dry season rainfall, J. Clim., 17, 1306-1319.<br />

Nepstad, D. C., et al. (2002), The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes,<br />

aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest, J. Geophys.<br />

Res., 107(D20), 8085, doi:10.1029/2001JD000360.<br />

Otterman, J., A. Manes, S. Rubin, P. Alpert, and D. O’C. Starr (1990), An increase of early rains<br />

in southern Israel following land-use change? Bound. Layer Meteor., 53, 333-351.<br />

Patz, J. A., P. Daszak, G. M. Tabor, A. A. Agruirre, M. Pearl, J. Epstein, N. D. Wolfe, A. M.<br />

Kilpatrick, J. Foufopoulos, D. Molyneux, and D. J. Bradley (2004), Unhealthy<br />

landscapes: Policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease<br />

emergence, Environ. Health Perspect., 112(10), 1092-1098.<br />

Patz, J. A., T. K. Graczyk, N. Geller, and A. Y. Vittor (2000), Effects of environmental change<br />

on emerging parasitic diseases, Int. J. Parasitol., 30 (12-13), 1395-1405.<br />

Peters, R. L., and J. D. Darling (1985), The greenhouse effect and nature reserves, Biosciences,<br />

35, 707.<br />

Pielke, R.A. Sr. (2001), Influence of the spatial distribution of vegetation and soils on the<br />

prediction of cumulus convective rainfall, Reviews of Geophysics, 39, 151-177.


Impact of Deforestation on the<br />

Sustainability of Biodiversity in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

Pielke, R. A. (1984), Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling, 612 pp., Academic, San Diego,<br />

California.<br />

Pielke R. A. Sr. (1992), A comprehensive meteorological modeling system RAMS, Meteorol.<br />

Atmos. Phys., 49, 69-91.<br />

Pimm, S. L. (2001), The world according to Pimm: A scientist audits the Earth, McGraw-Hill, NY<br />

Rabin, R. M., and D. W. Martin (1996), Satellite observations of shallow cumulus coverage<br />

over central United States: An exploration of land use impact on cloud cover, J.<br />

Geophys. Res., 101, 7149-7155.<br />

Rabin, R. M., S. Stadler, P. Wetzel, D. J. Stensrud, and M. Gregory (1990), Observed effects of<br />

landscape variability on convective clouds, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 71, 272–280.<br />

Ramakrishnan, P. S. (2001), Ecology and sustainable development, National Book Trust, New<br />

Delhi, <strong>India</strong>.<br />

Ray, D.K., R.M. Welch, R.O. Lawton and U.S. Nair (2006), Dry season clouds and rainfall in<br />

northern Central America: Implications for the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor,<br />

Global Plant. Chang., 54, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.09.004.<br />

Ray, D.K., U.S. Nair, R.M. Welch, Q. Han, J. Zeng, W. Su and T.J. Lyons (2003), Effects of<br />

land use in Southwest Australia: Observations of cumulus cloudiness and energy<br />

fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D14), 4414, doi:10.1029/2002JD002654.<br />

Reichle, R. H., R. D. Koster, J. Dong, and A. A. Berg (2004), Global soil moisture from<br />

satellite observation, land surface models, and ground data: implications for data<br />

assimilation, J. of Hydrometeor., 5, 430-442.<br />

Sampaio, G., C. Nobre, M. H. Costa, P. Satyamurty, B. S. Soares-Filho, and M. Cardoso<br />

(2007), Regional climate change over eastern Amazonia caused by pasture and<br />

soybean cropland expansion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17709,<br />

doi:10.1029/2007GL030612.<br />

Saunders, D. A., H. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules (1991), Biological consequences of<br />

ecosystem fragmentation: A review, Conservation Biology, 5, 18-27.<br />

Segal, M., R. Avissar, M. C. McCumber, and R. A. Pielke (1988), Evaluation of vegetation<br />

effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations, J. Atmos. Sci.,<br />

45, 2268– 2292.<br />

Shukla, J., C. Nobre, and P. Sellers (1990), Amazon deforestation and climate change, Science,<br />

247, 1322-1325.<br />

Sizer, N., and E. V. J. Tanner (1999), Responses of woody plant seedlings to edge formation<br />

in a lowland tropical rainforest, Amazonia, Biol, Conserv., 91, 135-142.<br />

Sud, Y. C., W. C. Chao, and G. K. Walker (1993), Dependence of rainfall on vegetation:<br />

Theoretical considerations, simulation experiments, observations, and inferences<br />

from simulated atmospheric soundings, J. Arid Environ., 25, 5 – 18.<br />

Swift, L. W., W. T. Swank, J. B. Mankin, R. J. Luxmoore, and R. A. Goldstein (1975),<br />

Simulation of evapotranspiration from mature and clear-cut deciduous forest and<br />

young pine plantations, Water Resources Research, 11, 667-673.<br />

Tauil, P. L. (2001), Urbanization and dengue ecology, Cadernos de Saude Publica., 17 (Suppl.),<br />

99-102.<br />

Viana, V. M., A. A. Tabanez, and J. Batista (1997), Dynamics and restoration of forest<br />

fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic moist forest, In: Tropical forest remnants: ecoogy,<br />

management, and conservation of fragmented communities, W. F. Laurence and R. O.<br />

Bierregaard (eds.), 352-365, Universityof Chicago Press.<br />

71


72<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Walko, R. L., et al., (2000), Coupled atmosphere-biophysics-hydrology models for<br />

environmental modeling. J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 931-944.<br />

Wallace and Hobbs (2006), Atmospheric Science: An Introduction Survey, Academic Press.<br />

Wang, J., R. L. Bras and E. A. B. Eltahir (2000), The impact of the observed deforestation on<br />

the mesoscale distribution of rainfall and clouds in Amazonia, J. Hydrometeor., 1,<br />

267-286.<br />

Weaver, C. P., and R. Avissar (2001), Atmospheric disturbances caused by human<br />

modification of landscape, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 269–282.<br />

Wetzel, P. J., S. Argentini, and A. Boone (1996), Role of land surface in controlling daytime<br />

cloud amount: Two case studies in GCIP-SW area, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7359-7370.<br />

Whitehead, P. G., and M. Robinson (1993), Experimental basin studies: An international and<br />

historical perspective of forest impacts, J. Hydrology, 145, 217-230.


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation<br />

and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

1. Introduction<br />

5<br />

Andrej Kranjc<br />

Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts<br />

Slovenia<br />

Dinaric Mountains are one of the main mountain systems of the Balkans. The name was<br />

given by of the imposing Dinara Mountain (1913 m) at the border between Herzegovina<br />

(Bosnia and Herzegovina) and Dalmatia (Croatia). Under the name of Dinaric Alps it<br />

appeared already in the 18 th century (Hacquet 1785). The part of Dinaric Mountains which is<br />

mostly built by carbonate rocks, limestone predominating, is called Dinaric Karst. The name<br />

Karst as well as the international term “karst” derived from the plateau Kras (Carso in<br />

Italian, Karst in German), the north westernmost plateau of the Dinaric Karst ridges (Kranjc,<br />

2011). Dinaric Mountains are a mountain chain approximately 650 km long and up to 150<br />

km large, covering an area of about 60 000 km 2, stretching between 42° and 46° of northern<br />

latitude (Fig. 1).<br />

Fig. 1. Delimitation of the Dinaric Karst after Roglić and Gams (Mihevc & Prelovšek, 2010).


74<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Geologically, Dinaric Mountains consist of two parts: Inner Dinarides at Northeast and<br />

External Dinarides at Southwest (Mihevc & Prelovšek, 2010; Zupan Hajna, 2010). While in<br />

the Internal Dinarides non-carbonate rocks prevail, in the External one the carbonate rocks<br />

are predominant – therefore there is karst. A. Penck’s student of Vienna “geomorphological<br />

school”, Jovan Cvijić was probably the most influential scholar to propagate karst and to<br />

substantiate the karst science. In his basic works of 1893 and 1895 (Cvijić, 2000) he stated:<br />

“All the forms on the bare limestone, made by water, we will call karst features”. Cvijić’s<br />

connotation of karst is “bare limestone landscape”. The travellers who travelled from<br />

Vienna to Austrian Adriatic port of Trieste were the most impressed by a sudden change of<br />

landscape. After Postojna, they entered a bare rock land, without surface water and<br />

especially without any greenery. In 1689, Valvasor in his topography wrote about the Kras<br />

(Karst) plateau: “Somewhere it is possible to see for some miles, but everything is only grey,<br />

nothing green, because all the country is covered by stones.” Illustration from the same<br />

work shows the cultivated land at the bottom of dolines only (Valvasor 1689). In many parts<br />

of the Dinaric Karst it is true for the actual situation (Fig. 2). On 18 th century military maps<br />

the entire Kras surface is shown as “”Steinigte Terrain” (rocky terrain) (Fig. 3). Description<br />

of individual settlements added as a comment to the maps often stated: “There are no<br />

forests or trees, just some bushes one hour away from the village” as shown by the example<br />

of the village Gabrovitza (actual Gabrovica pri Komnu) (Rajšp, 1997).<br />

Fig. 2. On Dinaric Karst cultivated land is mainly in the bottom of dolines only (photo A.<br />

Kranjc).


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Fig. 3. Military map of Kras plateau from the second half of the 18 th century: great majority<br />

of the surface is “Steinigter Terrain” (Stony terrain) (Rajšp, 1997).<br />

Fig. 4. About 1850 the nowadays woody hill Sovič above Postojna was bare (Schmidl, 1854).<br />

75


76<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Impressions of travellers across karst terrain between Postojna and Trieste are all depressing<br />

(Fig. 4). Count Karl von Zinzendorf wrote in 1771:”The country is affreux. All these terrible<br />

rocks and in the midst of them some small cultivated parts of land encircled by stones...; ”<br />

and B. F. J. Hermann in 1780: “Anywhere you look, it is only desert...” (Panjek, 2006). To the<br />

end of the 19 th century and even later the impression of karst got from the published works<br />

of scholars as well as of laymen was one of bare rock and dry landscape. But it was not<br />

always such. On the Dinaric Karst, nowadays there are completely bare landscapes, mostly<br />

on the Mediterranean side, but there are also extensive forests covering slopes of high<br />

mountains and the tops of karst plateaus in the interior. Good examples of preserved forests<br />

are Rajhenau primeval forest (Kočevski Rog plateau above Kočevje in Slovenia)<br />

(Rajhenavski pragozd, 2011) and the forest Lom (Piceo-Abieti-Fagetum illyricum) on the<br />

Klekovača Mountain in Bosnia (Prašuma Lom, 2011). The first one occupies about 50 ha of<br />

Abieti-Fagetum dinaricum. The forest of Kočevje is a part of the biggest uninterrupted forest<br />

complex in the Western and Central Europe, stretching from the Kočevje region (Slovenia)<br />

to Gorski Kotar (Croatia).<br />

The aim of the case study of this chapter is to show that man is the main factor both at<br />

destroying his natural environment and at restoring it. The man is capable of both. In our<br />

case that means a complete deforestation, the changing of a heavy wooded landscape to a<br />

bare rocky desert and back again to a dense, although, to be true, not a “natural” or optimal,<br />

forest, as it shows the further text. Of course the time scale is different as well as the attitude<br />

towards these processes triggered in both cases by the human itself. The first dwellers<br />

millennia ago have not seen, they did not know and they could not imagine what a process<br />

they have started by cleaning land for pastures and fields. And the process of deforestation<br />

and finally desertification lasted thousands of years. If reforestation was premeditated by<br />

well planned actions the actors knew well their aim and purpose. Comparing the lasting of<br />

reforestation with deforestation this was a short but an intensive action. The karst terrain,<br />

Dinaric Karst especially, is such a terrain where the human activities leading towards<br />

desertification have shown their most disastrous consequences and where the opposite<br />

action, reforestation, demanded extremely great efforts and financial input. This case study<br />

is not meant to be just a history of a forest but also a warning what can happen, not only in<br />

the mist of history, but also nowadays.<br />

2. Deforestation<br />

Deforestation started in prehistoric times already, by the arrival of people with Neolithic<br />

culture, leading Neolithic way of life, the transition from gathering and hunting to<br />

stockbreeding and farming, the so called Neolithic revolution. The Balkan Peninsula is a sort<br />

of bridge between Near East, across Asia Minor towards Central and Western Europe and<br />

the Neolithic culture reached it between 6 500 and 6 000 BC. Neolithic farmers did not enter<br />

far into the Dinaric Mountains. Instead they advanced across the fertile plains along the<br />

Danube River on the North and along the Adriatic coastal strip in the South, so avoiding the<br />

mountainous regions (Velušček, 1999). So their impact on the forest of Dinaric karst had to<br />

be negligible, with some exceptions - the Butmir locality for example. Pollen analyses show<br />

that the intensive deforestation phase occurred due to grazing during prehistory on the<br />

plateau of Kras (Slapšak, 1995). To confirm the prehistoric deforestation Gams’ (1991)<br />

research on Rillenkarren is very illustrative; he found out that they started to be formed on


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

the plateau Kras 3 000 – 3 500 years BP, which is when the forest was destroyed and bare<br />

rock started to appear on the surface (Fig. 5).<br />

Fig. 5. Rillenkarren on a limestone rock: they start to form about 3 000 – 3 500 years ago<br />

while the smooth lower lying surface was covered by soil much longer (photo K. Kranjc).<br />

During the Bronze Age, the situation changed drammatically. The population increased and<br />

due to their economy (farming, stockbreeding, and ore mining) entered deeply into the<br />

Dinaric Karst where they had to clear and cut the timber, which was used for buildings and<br />

defence installations as well as for ore smelting. In Dinaric karst the settlements were<br />

concentrated mainly in two border zones: on the Adriatic coastal plains (Low Periadriatic<br />

Karst) and on the karst plains and hills along the Pannonian plain (Low Peripannonian<br />

Karst). The innermost parts of Dinaric Karst seem to remain quite untouched. Thanks to<br />

archaeological research we know that during this population expansion the climax Abieti-<br />

Fagetum forest was already being replaced by lower association of Quercus type in some<br />

parts of Dinaric Karst (Turk et al., 1993).<br />

During the Early Iron Age (Hallstatt culture) practically all the Dinaric Karst was settled and<br />

during the Late Iron Age (La Tène culture) Dinaric region entered into history: the native<br />

(Illyrian) tribes are known by names, in the southern Dinaric coast and islands Greek<br />

colonies were founded, from the North came a Celtic invasion and from the West the Roman<br />

one. From that period, the names of peoples living in the region are known: Illyrian tribes,<br />

Celtic tribes, Greeks and Romans. Regarding the use of timber and wood and the economy<br />

in general, the cause of deforestation, the choice of motives is very large: Illyrians deep in<br />

the interior of Dinaric Karst tended big flocks of sheep and goats using the transhumance<br />

system, and the farmers not abreast with the time used slash-and-burn system. To increase<br />

pasture areas shepherds also used the fire. On the Dinaric Karst, considering its climate, a<br />

forest fire does not only destroy trees and surface vegetation. Its consequence is much more<br />

important because it increases rain and wind erosion processes and rock aridity. In such<br />

cases woodlands can be really transformed into “rock deserts”. Metallurgy using so-called<br />

“bean ore” (Bohnerz) which is very frequent in karst soil and clay, had to consume big<br />

quantities of wood, as shown by modern experiments (Kranjc, 2002). Near Straža village by<br />

the town of Novo mesto (NW part of Dinaric Karst, Slovenian Low Peripannonian Karst), 24<br />

77


78<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

smelting furnaces were burning simultaneously as is shown by the archaeological research<br />

(Dular & Božič, 1999). While the Romans (the army at the beginning and colonists later) and<br />

Greeks used wood for construction, industry (including metallurgy, charcoal and lime<br />

production, pottery), heating (thermae with big basins of hot water were necessity of<br />

townspeople everyday life) and many other needs connected with high developed culture.<br />

Along the Dinaric area - that is the Adriatic coast, shipbuilding was important too, for both<br />

the Illyrians as well as for Greek colonies. From historical sources it is known that the fleets<br />

consisted of a big number of smaller boats (lemba and liburna), but also big boats were<br />

constructed. Ancient authors, Polybius for example, often mentioned numbers of ships of<br />

Illyrian fleets:”Scerdilaedas … provided 40 lembas and Demetrios of Pharos 50”. To build<br />

the liburna, 33 m long and 5 m large ship with 36 oars, quite a lot of wood was needed.<br />

Polybius reported that Macedonian king Philippos the 5 th ordered to construct 100 liburnas<br />

during the winter 217/216 BC. For oars alone they needed 3 600 adequate straight young<br />

trees, not accounting for spare oars. That this was an important question proved the report<br />

of Andokidos who came to help to the army of Samos: “For the beginning, I prepared wood<br />

for oars for your army of Samos.” When Brazida conquered the town of Amphipolis this fact<br />

“… provoked great fear among the Athenians … because from there they got the wood for<br />

shipbuilding…”, both quotations taken from Thucydides (Cabanes, 2002).<br />

From the opposite part of the Europe, from Scandinavia it is reported that the Viking’s<br />

shipbuilding came to a serious deadlock because there were no more suitable trees in their<br />

homeland (Atkinson, 1979). In the Dinaric Karst such a problem is not known from historical<br />

times but aroused seriously in the 19 th century, as seen from the text below. The Ljubljana<br />

Moor lies at the foot of high karst plateaus of NW Dinaric Karst. Between the towns of<br />

Nauportus at the foot of the plateau with very important karst spring, and Emona, the Roman<br />

legion had to build a road across the Moor in the first years AD. For the base of the road<br />

structure they placed thinner round tree trunks on the marshy soil. Illyrians (and other native<br />

peoples) to defend their oppida used palisades while Romans used them to defend their legion<br />

camps and also to strengthen walls of stone and wood combined to protect towns.<br />

Of course there is little direct evidence of larger deforested surfaces existing during<br />

Prehistoric and first Historic times. In the Smederevo polje of Lika (Croatia), the position of<br />

skeletons in burial mounds shows that the landscape was open with a thin soil cover, that<br />

means there were no (more) forest at the time of a funeral (Horvat, 1957). Many parts of the<br />

Dinaric Karst that are nowadays forest-covered again were dramatically different during the<br />

Iron Age, when this was an open country with small fields and pastures, and fortified<br />

hilltop settlements. In Bosnia and Herzegovina the majority of actual barren landscape is<br />

found around the former Illyrian hill forts and settlements (Djikić, 1957). Nevertheless, at<br />

the beginning of the historical times there must still have been much of forest-covered land<br />

as proved by the topographical names. The Island of Korčula (Dalmatia) was called Korkyra<br />

Melaina by Greeks and Korkyra Nigra by Romans, both names meaning Black Korkyra<br />

because of its dense pine forest cover. On the plateau Kras cultivated land was in form of<br />

islands around the settlements and quite a lot of forest remained in between (Slapšak, 1995).<br />

Knowing people and their history it is sure that the wars and clashes of arms existed in<br />

Prehistoric times, too. From the beginning of history on there are records of them from all<br />

periods. These violent activities had and has (just to remember the Vietnam War) a very<br />

great impact on forest. “Plunder and burn” was the most common motto: to get the booty and<br />

to devastate enemy’s country, that means to ruin it economically. Burning a forest was not just


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

an economical measure; it was used as a war or raid tactics, too. For example, the Turkish<br />

regular army cut down and burned woods to make easier way for the cavalry and heavy<br />

artillery, and to destroy Hajduks (Balkan guerrillas) hidouts and dwelling places. The army<br />

was ordered to destroy forest on both sides of roads to get clear zones to thwart ambushes by<br />

the Hajduks. From the 17 th century there are picturesque descriptions of such activities in the<br />

diary of the Turkish traveller Evliya Çelebi (Evlija, 1957). Reciprocally, forest was sometimes<br />

burned too by the defending population in attempts to prevent the enemy’s attack.<br />

During the late Antiquity another reason joined “traditional” deforestation – invasions of<br />

Barbarian peoples. Between 3 rd – 8 th centuries they crossed and often settled the territories of<br />

the Roman Empire, in our case the Roman provinces of Illyricum and Dalmatia. Especially<br />

frequented was the direction of the Roman road Aquileia - Carnuntum, leading across Dinaric<br />

Karst on the section between Tergeste (Trieste) and Emona (Ljubljana). The consequence of<br />

their approaching and settling was the movement that is flight, of Romanised inhabitants<br />

towards the coast and especially on the normally overgrown islands which are stretching all<br />

along the Adriatic coast. Today these islands are effectively uninhabited but traces proved that<br />

they were relatively densely populated during the Late Antiquity. Maybe the population<br />

increase was not the worst. Such troubled times favoured stockbreeding over farming and<br />

overgrazing together with burning to increase pasture lands left many of the previous<br />

mentioned islands completely bare. Such conditions remained to modern times and now these<br />

islands are used as meagre pasture for sheep only, not to mention the summer tourism (Fig. 6).<br />

Fig. 6. Kornati islands, practically nothing but dry pastures for sheep (photo A. Kranjc).<br />

The next troubled times after the barbarian invasions regarding human pressure and impact<br />

on the forest was the Turkish occupation of the majority of the Balkans and Turkish raids<br />

into the neighbouring countries, which seriously began in the 14 th century. The interior of<br />

the Balkans was Turkish Empire, much of the Adriatic coast belonged to the Venetian and<br />

Dubrovnik (Ragusa) Republics, and small part of the NW part belonged to Austria, either in<br />

the frame of so-called Military Zone (nowadays Croatia) or the Duchy of Carniola. Before<br />

the 14 th century the forests which were not commune were divided into forests for hunting,<br />

oak forests and small forests, in the frame of the Austrian lands. Animal grazing was<br />

forbidden in them and for cutting or burning wood severe fines were foreseen. An Act from<br />

1550 allowed all the inhabitants of Trieste, mule drovers and butchers to cut wood and grass in<br />

all of the commune’s forests. In 1689 two revisers reported: “In the town, there is a shortage of<br />

fire-wood, it is impossible to make a stock, because all the forests are destroyed”. In 1719 the<br />

port of Trieste was proclaimed a “free port”. To the Austrian annexation of Bosnia in 1878 in<br />

79


80<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

outline the situation remains the same. A significant part of the Christian population fled<br />

before the Turks and re-settled in Austrian, Hungarian, Venetian or Dubrovnik lands not far<br />

from the borders. These migrations included some long distance displacements. For instance,<br />

entire “tribal families” from the inner parts of Serbia moved to the Istria Peninsula in the most<br />

north westerly corner of the Adriatic Sea, and even to Carniola – nowadays Slovenia (Cvijić,<br />

1966). These groups moved with their flocks and commonly they continued primarily as<br />

owners and herders of grazing animals. Pressure on grazing land led to another increase in the<br />

rate of deforestation. The emigrants brought their slash-and-burn techniques, too.<br />

Transhumance together with burning, later also cutting of the forest, was preserved locally<br />

until the 20 th century, when they were observed by the first researchers, J. Cvijić among them.<br />

According to the eyewitness Gušić, the main reason of deforestation was clearing the land for<br />

new pastures or meadows and sowing of grain in “novine” (new fields), used once only (Gams<br />

& Gabrovec, 1999). That cutting and burning of a forest could locally trigger accelerated soil<br />

erosion is proved by the practice in the near past, when farmers in remote mountains have<br />

burned forest in order to create such “novina” (Kranjc, 1979). This process is not connected<br />

with the Dinaric Karst only but largely with the Mediterranean (Fig. 7). On Baleares Islands on<br />

the land not suitable for agriculture grazing was practised at least from the Catalan conquest<br />

(1229). Traditional economy was based on the repetitive burning of herbaceous brushwood of<br />

Ampelodesmos mauritanica. This released active soil removal as well as the progressive<br />

degradation of scrub formation. At the end of the chain the bare rock results (Ginés, 1999). For<br />

some of authors, the main reason of not only deforestation but of the degradation to the bare<br />

rock country was grazing, grazing by goats especially (Wessely, 1876).<br />

Fig. 7. In some parts of Dinaric Karst the burning of shrubs is still practised (photo K. Kranjc).


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

In parts of the Dinaric Karst under Austrian and Venetian influence, the agrarian pressure<br />

was not the only economic reason for deforestation. In the Venetian territory construction<br />

work and shipbuilding demanded large quantities of timber. It is reported that 1 200 000<br />

tree trunks were needed for use as piles to support the church of Santa Maria della Salute in<br />

Venice (Horvat, 1957). It is difficult to imagine the whole number of piles, using for the<br />

churches, palaces and other buildings in Venice. Without doubt a great part of them came<br />

from the Dinaric Karst. There is a popular saying that the Venice “stands on oaks from<br />

Karst”. In the time of the French Revolution (1792), the duty of the French consul in Albania<br />

was to take care of “cutting down construction timber for navy base at Toulon”. Marshal<br />

Marmont for example, the Governor of the Illyrian provinces under Napoleon, ordered to<br />

cut off the tops of all the trees in one of the still remaining oak forest in the vicinity of<br />

Trieste, called Frned, to use them as a timber for ships. As a consequence the forest decayed<br />

completely to 1820. In the Austrian part of the Dinaric Karst the farmers (villeins and serfs)<br />

did not have the right to cut timber for trade before the so-called “Land Release” issued by<br />

the Empress Maria Theresa in 1848. In NW part of the Dinaric Karst the Austrian Navy had<br />

forest reserves, mainly oak. In these forests it was forbidden to fell timber for other<br />

purposes. The Navy’s demand was great: the navy’s forester (by the way the inventor of the<br />

vessel screw, too) J. Ressel reckoned up that to construct and maintain during its 150-year<br />

life a wooden battle ship 120 000 tree trunks were needed. In that time Austrian merchant<br />

navy had 523 big ships. To maintain the number 6.244 m 3 of wood would be needed, while<br />

the production of the Istrian forests was 7.030 m 3 (Piškorić, 1993). Good husbandry would<br />

thus not cause the deforestation by itself. But In 1819 the marine forest reserve was cancelled<br />

and massive felling programme started. Timber was sold to Venice, France, and especially<br />

to England (Murko, 1957). It is not surprise that the emperor Maximillian when visiting<br />

Trieste in 1850, described the plateau Kras as a rock desert with a curse hanging over it<br />

(Anonym, 2001) (Fig. 8).<br />

Fig. 8. The view of the plateau Kras above Trieste in 1901 (Anonym, 2001).<br />

The consequence of the mentioned “Land-Release” was disastrous for the forests in the<br />

Austrian parts of the Dinaric Karst. According to this act farmers became owners of the land<br />

81


82<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

which included right to cut down trees and to sell them. And they used new rights to a full<br />

extent, not thinking of replanting young trees. Parallel to this process, industrial development,<br />

especially mining and metallurgy contributed significantly to deforestation, even on remote<br />

karst plateaus in Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. During the second half of the 19 th<br />

century, special narrow-gauge railroads were laid down to facilitate exploitation of the Dinaric<br />

Karst forests. The changes or regression in some branches of industry, metallurgy especially,<br />

can show indirectly the changes in forest structure or deforestation even. An example is the<br />

decrease of iron industry of the well known industrial Ž. Zois of Kranjska (Carniola) at the end<br />

of the 18 th century. Some of his ironworks went short of fuel that is of charcoal. The so called<br />

“Slovene furnace” needed 50-60 % more charcoal than ore. Zois tried to use charcoal made of<br />

soft trees (spruce) instead of hardwood (beech). This is also one of the reasons of the change of<br />

the forest structure: for the shipbuilding the oak was over exploited and for the iron industry<br />

the beech (Kranjc, 2002) (Fig. 9).<br />

Fig. 9. “Cooking” of charcoal on the Dinaric Karst at the beginning of the 20 th century<br />

(Anonym, 2001).<br />

As indicated in the text above, there were different factors causing deforestation of the<br />

Dinaric Karst and there are regions affected by different steps of deforestation. In any case<br />

the factor was man, either through his economy as stockbreeding and transhumance, slashand-burn<br />

agriculture, fire wood gathering, construction and different branches of industry,<br />

shipbuilding and metallurgy emphasized or other, hostile activities, as “plunder and burn”,<br />

army movements, attacks and protection of them, and last but not least the pressure on<br />

agricultural land. Some parts, relatively small and rare, of the Dinaric karst are practically<br />

unaffected by the process of deforestation and still nowadays covered by a dense forest;<br />

some others have still forest cover but heavily changed, and the last stage is “šikara”,<br />

shrubberies and thickets. Big surfaces are pastures without any trees and some parts of the<br />

Dinaric Karst are bare rock landscape. Generally speaking the bareness of the Dinaric Karst<br />

is lesser in the central parts, and going towards the Adriatic coast, it increased reaching real<br />

rocky desert on Adriatic slopes and on the islands.


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Fig. 10. Bare high ridge of the Velebit Mountain (photo A. Kranjc).<br />

Fig. 11. Stony pasture on the Pag Island, sea side slopes of the Velebit Mountain in the<br />

background (photo A. Kranjc).<br />

While the number of inhabitants increased, economic facilities did not follow the population<br />

growth. Data from the Karlovac district of Croatia, which has an extremely great proportion<br />

of karst landscape, can be shown as an example. In the middle of the 18 th century, there<br />

were 940 inhabitants per square mile, while hundred years later, in 1850, there were 1824.<br />

This means that the population nearly doubled in a hundred years (Wessely, 1876). It was<br />

not a specific of the Karlovac district, in many parts or even in majority of Dinaric Karst the<br />

greatest population pressure on karst land was during the 19 th century. Regarding the<br />

available data the example of Dinaric Karst in Slovenia can be taken into consideration. In<br />

83


84<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Slovenia as a whole there was a minimum of forest cover around 1875. Forest then covered<br />

37 % of the surface, while in the district of Postojna, which included a great part of the<br />

Dinaric Karst in Slovenia, the forest covered 26 % in the year 1880 (Azarov, 1994). According<br />

to Gams (1991) the plateau Kras had only 20 % of forest surface in 1900. In 1989 the share of<br />

forest increased to 51 % and nowadays the rate of forest still increases, its share being<br />

estimated to be over 60 % of Slovenia and over 50 % of the Kras plateau. On Kras, it is<br />

mostly the monoculture black pine tree forest. The course of reforestation is now going on<br />

by itself; pastures are becoming overgrown by shrubs and being slowly transformed into<br />

forests. The surface is slowly overgrown first by tall herbs, then with shrub species, and<br />

finally by trees and forest ground flora. The front of pine forest, if not interfered by human,<br />

progresses at a maximum of 17 metres per year; computer modelling forecasts that the<br />

whole region of Kras will be overgrown by shrubs and trees till 2013 (Pertot, 1989).<br />

On the karst of Croatia, forest cover decreased to an alarming state during the 19 th century,<br />

too. In this time there was hardly any forest on the coastal side of the Dinaric Mountains.<br />

But the records of “Trieste Commercial Commissariat” for 1756 showed millions of trunks<br />

(Wessely, 1876). In the second half of the 19 th century on the “Mountain Karst” (Fig. 10) of<br />

Croatia 39 % of surface was categorized as bare (non-productive) land, the “karst” in narrow<br />

sense of meaning, while on the “Sea Side Karst” such category includes 93 %, as shown by<br />

the same author (Fig. 11). It is difficult to imagine that nearly the entire country was<br />

“unproductive” bare rock landscape. In that time, the meaning of karst was just a “bare<br />

limestone landscape”. And what was the prospect for the future: “General-Domänen-<br />

Inspektor und Forstakademie-Direktor a.D.” reckoned that the surface of forest diminishes<br />

every year for 1 % in the frame of the Austrian Littoral and Dalmatia.<br />

3. Natural vegetation of the Dinaric Karst<br />

Available data suggest that originally about 90 % of Dinaric Karst were covered by a forest,<br />

in some areas even more. Many temperate taxa appear to have survived in the region<br />

during the last glacial in low but persistent population. A greater diversity of taxa existed in<br />

the mid to high altitude sites probably where the climate was more humid. At the<br />

lateglacial/Holocene transition many tree taxa expanded simultaneously. Changes in the<br />

composition of the early Holocene woodland included a change in the forest dominants<br />

between 8 000 and 7 000 BP, and the appearance and increase of Carpinus orient./Ostrya,<br />

Abies, Carpinus betulus and Fagus between 7 500 and 5 000 BP (Willis, 1994). In the northwestern<br />

part of Dinaric Karst mixed oak forest (Quercetum mixtum) prevailed during the first<br />

postglacial warm (Boreal) period. During the Atlantic period fir and beech (Abieti-fagetum)<br />

had already developed as a climax forest. Dinaric Mountains’ flora belongs to both the<br />

Mediterranean and the Euro-Siberian-North American phytoregions. In the Mediterranean<br />

region the main forest type includes Mediterranean (evergreen) oak (Quercus ilex) and Black<br />

Dalmatian pine (Pinus nigra dalmatica) while Dinaric fir and beech forest (Abieti-fagetum<br />

dinaricum) prevails in the interior. Black pine (Pinus nigra) is indigenous to some small karst<br />

areas of Slovenia (Culiberg et al., 1997; Šercelj, 1996) (Fig. 12). Development of the present<br />

day landscape started at approximately 4 500 BP with the onset of anthropogenic<br />

disturbance. Clearance resulted in increase of open ground herbaceous types with grasses<br />

(Willis, 1994).


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Fig. 12. Pollen diagram, showing great change around the year 1 000 BC as well as around 1<br />

000 AD (Culiberg et al., 1997).<br />

4. Forest protection and reforestation of the Dinaric Karst<br />

As it was seen the main cause of the deforestation of the Dinaric Karst was man. But it does<br />

not mean that nobody cared for forests and did not see their importance. Officials,<br />

administrators, town councils realized at an early stage already, that deforestation could be<br />

a great threat and even an economic catastrophe, and a disaster for the everyday life of<br />

people. Many attempts of protecting and safeguarding forests by administrative, economic,<br />

penal and other measures are known from history, sometimes very strict. In spite of them<br />

deforestation reached alarming proportions.<br />

From the 12 th century on various Acts and documents are known, attempting to regulate<br />

tree cutting, protection of forest and reforestation. The town of Trieste, an important port at<br />

the foot of the plateau Kras introduced such an act in 1150 already. Similar to Trieste, who<br />

has no (more) forest in his hinterland, other towns of the Adriatic coast and islands, such as<br />

Korčula, Trogir, Dubrovnik, Skradin, Hvar, and Poljica, regulated the exploitation and<br />

protection of forest by town statutes enacted between 1214 and 1444. Venice edited a forest<br />

act in 1452 (Fig. 13) while for Istria Peninsula, Friuli and Karst the “Waldordnung” (the<br />

Forest Act) from 1541 is well known (Gašperšič & Winkler, 1986).<br />

Despite the concern for forests these acts show that at that time the deforestation by cutting,<br />

clearing and burning had already seriously started. However in some presently barren<br />

places, forests still existed (Horvat, 1957). That the matter was taken seriously shows the<br />

example of Trieste, where an armed guard had to be organised by the town to protect the<br />

local forest in 1583 (Guttenberg, 1881) (Fig. 14). The said Acts commonly included a ban on<br />

goats, or a complete ban on grazing in the forest. In 1764 the edict was issued banning the<br />

free pasture of goats in the Military Croatia. Thousands of goats have been sold or<br />

85


86<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

slaughtered but at the end of the century there were again about 64 000 of them in Karlovac<br />

district only. In 1771 the Court office in Vienna issued a ban on the practice of transhumance<br />

across the karst of Carniola, which involved winter sheep grazing in Istria Peninsula<br />

lowland along the Adriatic coast, and summer grazing on the Kras and on higher karst<br />

plateaus (Nanos, Snežnik). Despite the interdiction a long distance transhumance, from<br />

Bosnian karst plateaus along the Adriatic coast to the Slovenian part of the Dinaric Karst<br />

and back to Bosnia along the Sava River valley, was practised from time to time until the<br />

second half of the last century. The last time it happened the police put the flock and the<br />

shepherds on the train and they were send back to Bosnia. The administration repeatedly<br />

issued acts on ban of goats: 1844 in Istria, 1870 in Gorizia, and 1874 in Trieste. The Republic<br />

of Slovenia (in the frame of Yugoslavia) banned goats by a decree in 1952, and finally<br />

Yugoslavia banned goat breeding, except in stables, in 1954 (Wessely, 1976; Papež, 1991).<br />

Fig. 13. Venice “Waldordnung” (Forest Act) of 1452 (Gašperšič & Winkler, 1986).


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Fig. 14. The first black pine plantations of Kras plateau needed an armed guard (Anonym,<br />

2001).<br />

Even the Turkish threat sometimes had results that were favourable for forest conservation.<br />

To maintain the protection zone of dense forest against the advance and passage of irregular<br />

Turkish raiding bands, it was forbidden to touch any tree or bush in the forest within a few<br />

hours ride of the south-eastern border of Carniola.<br />

But all the administrative measures were of little help and there was less and less forest.<br />

Early already some specialists suggested the reforestation. In his book “Hydrographical<br />

letters from Carniola” (Kranjska, the Austrian hereditary land) which is in fact a description<br />

of Carniolian karst, T. Gruber proposed reforestation as the most effective measure against<br />

the wind “burja”, which caused quite an important damage and transport obstacle,<br />

especially in winter (Gruber, 1781). On the Istria Peninsula and in other parts of Dinaric<br />

coast under the Venetian Republic, all the oak forests and all oak trees everywhere were<br />

reserved for its shipyards, the Arsenal. The owner of the forest has the right to use only<br />

those forest products, trees, which the Arsenal did not need. Sentences were severe,<br />

including capital punishment. Of special value were naturally curved trunks of Quercus<br />

pubescens. In 1815, after the Vienna Congress, former Venetian territories of Istria and<br />

northern Adriatic Sea belonged to Austria. Soon after, in 1819, Austria had cancelled the<br />

navy oak reserve. The main forest keeper and navy manager of forest in Carniola, J. Ressel,<br />

realised that soon there would not be enough timber for navy needs. He proposed another<br />

type of navy forest reserve, different from the Venetian one, based upon constraint and<br />

punishment. He named his system “buying reserve” – the owner would get paid in<br />

advance, for each 10-years addition through growth, before cutting down a tree. Later, in<br />

1842 Ressel proposed “Die Wiederbewalderung der Gemainde Gründe Istriens” (The new<br />

reforestation of the commons of Istria) project. He tried to achieve reforestation by planting<br />

acorns, stating that the oak to be the best, but it proved unsuccessful (Piškorić, 1993). Later,<br />

in 1852 he proposed a similar plan for the part of Kras belonging to the towns of Trieste and<br />

Gorizia (Fig. 15).<br />

87


88<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 15. Josef Ressel (1793-1857) and the first page of his “History of E.&K. Navy Forests” of<br />

1855 (Gašperšič & Winkler, 1986).<br />

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Agriculture began to stimulate and finance reforestation, in<br />

response to complaints from karst communities and professionals, from the forestry bodies<br />

and J. Ressel especially, about the rigours of life on a barren rock landscape. A detailed<br />

study of such a life was made by Wessely (1876). In 1857, the first railway which crossed the<br />

Karst was completed, that is the connection of Vienna to Trieste. There were great problems<br />

protecting the railroad against the strong northeast wind called Burja in Slovene, Bura in<br />

Croatian, and Bora in Italian language, probably meaning or coming from “Borealis”. The<br />

major obstacle were snowdrifts formed by this wind. The Southern Railways Company had<br />

to build high drystone walls along the route of the railway; but they found it cheaper and<br />

better to plant trees along it; so they support and even join the reforestation programme. In<br />

1859 the first successful reforestation occurred, using young black pine (Pinus nigra var.<br />

austriaca) seedlings on the plateau of Kras at Bazovica in the vicinity of Trieste, by J. Koller.<br />

The first successes boosted confidence and the activity spread to other parts of the karst<br />

within and outside of the Austrian lands (Fig. 16).<br />

In 1885 finally the “Reforestation Act for Carniola (=Kranjska)” was issued, regulating the<br />

entire process, which included major work and investment as tree nurseries, wall<br />

construction, land preparation, and seedlings planting. On the karst terrains there were<br />

entire villages where reforestation provided the main or perhaps the only income.<br />

Everybody, men, women and children, was involved in these works: men were digging<br />

holes; women were planting seedlings, while children were bringing water and watering<br />

seedlings (Goll, 1898) (Fig. 17). Publications showing their success were published on<br />

different occasions (Goll, 1898). From all over Europe specialists came to Kras to see this<br />

successful reforestation, the senator Marquis de Campo and forestry engineer don Carlos de<br />

Mazeredo from Spain as an example (Rubbia, 1912).


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Fig. 16. The first black pine plantations along the railway towards Trieste (Goll, 1898).<br />

Fig. 17. Managing of black pine plantation above the Trieste in 1905 (Anonym, 2001).<br />

Different activities were taking place in other parts of the Dinaric Karst too, the difference<br />

being due to local political and administrative particularities. There are also differences in<br />

the accessibility of documents and of publications. For some regions, in the frame of Austria<br />

for example, there is quite a lot of published works, technical documentation even, while for<br />

the parts which were in the frame of the Ottoman Empire, documentation is maybe more<br />

scarce and in any case more difficult to find and more difficult to understand, if written in<br />

Turkish language and in Arabic script. Under Hungarian administration Croatia was<br />

divided into Military Zone or Military Croatia (along the border with Turkish Empire) and<br />

89


90<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Provincial (Civil) Croatia. Due to Napoleon’s ultimatum, Doge Ludovico Manin<br />

surrendered unconditionally on May 12, 1797 and abdicated, while the Major Council<br />

declared the end of the Venetian Republic. The Illyrian Provinces were created by the Treaty<br />

of Schönbrunn in 1809, and embraced a big part of the Dinaric Karst, beside Carniola the<br />

former Venetian territories along the Adriatic coast. Bosnia and Herzegovina remained in<br />

the Ottoman Empire until 1878 when it was annexed by Austria. In 1918, when the Kingdom<br />

of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, was founded, Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina as well as the great majority of the Dinaric Karst were included in it.<br />

Fig. 18. The title page of the Venetian Forest Act for Istria of 1777 (Gašperšič & Winkler, 1986).<br />

In 1871 when the military organisation of Croatia ended, the Austro-Hungarian Emperor<br />

wrote: “… the income of the sale of wood from the country’s state’s forests has to be used<br />

for investing, especially for the reforestation of karst.” (Wessely, 1876). This was followed by<br />

the 1864 “Waldordnung” (The Forest Act) of the Military Croatia aimed at planting the<br />

barren land with a beech and a fir. Interesting illustration is the example of so-called<br />

“Laudonov gaj” (General Laudon’s Wood) at Krbavsko polje in the Lika region. The western<br />

part of the polje was covered by moving sands. The later famous Austrian<br />

“Generalfeldwachtmeister” (major-general) G. E. Laudon served there, at Bunić in Karlovac<br />

region in 1740s. After becoming the major-general, he ordered to plant the forest there to fix<br />

the sands and to prevent damage to agriculture. Under the Military administration about


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

700 ha was planted with black pine and oak, in the form of a military formation as said. In<br />

1965, it was proclaimed a forest reserve (Jaić, 2011).<br />

Reforestation of the karst pastures in the hinterland of the port of Rijeka began in 1857<br />

(Horvat, 1957). In Dalmatia, they tried to start reforestation under the Venetian regime<br />

already, by the so-called Grimani Act of 1756, but due to bad administration and corrupt<br />

officials the work did not even start (Fig. 18). During the time of the French Illyrian<br />

Provinces (1809-1813) each commune had to plant a “sacred wood” (bois sacré), but the<br />

provinces’ period was too short to achieve the desired results. Successful reforestation began<br />

in the 1880s following the example of Trieste. Yet in the countries of the Ottoman Empire,<br />

there are no Acts and no activities for protection of the forest or for reforestation known.<br />

From 1918 practically all of the Dinaric Karst was within the borders of the Kingdom of<br />

Yugoslavia. Not earlier than in 1929 the State’s Act on forest was issued with the essential<br />

prescription: “…all deforested lands especially on karst has to be set apart in the period of<br />

10 years with the aim to be afforested as soon as possible. Reforestation has to be realized in<br />

50 years…”. Even the state did not last 50 years and such a decree was impossible to<br />

implement, so it survived on paper only (Djikić, 1957). Systematic reforestation slowly<br />

spread over the entire of the Dinaric Karst and continued into the 1950s. In the socialist<br />

Yugoslavia, immediately after the end of the 2 nd World War, massive actions of reforestation<br />

in the form of “Mladinske delovne brigade” (Youth work brigade), a form of a voluntary<br />

youth work were organized in the form of summer camps. On the karst of Slovenia one of<br />

the last actions was the reforestation work in 1950s on the Vremščica Mountain between<br />

Postojna and Trieste. From these times on, reforestation is mainly the duty of the forestry<br />

organization and of the owners of the forests.<br />

Fig. 19. On a karst plateau, a pasture started to be overgrown by trees (photo K. Kranjc).<br />

91


92<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Defforestation, degradation and in some cases desertification even of Dinaric Karst started<br />

early in prehistoric times. They reached the peak in the second half of the 18 th and in the first<br />

half of the 19 th century. In any case, the reason was human factor, the economy with no<br />

attitude to sustainability at all. During the last thousand years it is possible to see the<br />

attempts to prevent the forest or even to meliorate, to reforest degraded lands. By the<br />

middle of the 19 th century such attempts were mainly unsuccessful, but from that time on<br />

the situation started to change rapidly. At the beginning, reforestation was a sort of massactivity<br />

while nowadays other factors join it. The general perception of the importance of a<br />

forest and of the sustainability helped a lot, but also the change of economy and activity of<br />

the population of the Dinaric Karst, the decline of the agriculture emphasized. Maybe the<br />

Dinaric Karst is turning to the other extreme – to be overgrown (Fig. 19). In Slovenia, on the<br />

Kras particularly specialists as well as laymen started to ask: how to prevent the Kras from<br />

becoming overgrown? “How to reasonably stop the overgrowing of Kras” is the title of a<br />

round table organized by the review “Kras” at Nova Gorica in 1997. The discussion also<br />

showed that foresters suggested replacing slowly black pine with oak (Mlinšek 1993).<br />

The foresters also suggested that Kras should be a field experimental laboratory of<br />

international importance to study the revitalization of a completely degraded landscape.<br />

Especially important should be the study of the revitalization of thermophile associations,<br />

which are the most affected and at the same time the most suppressed and neglected by the<br />

World’s public (Mlinšek, 1993).<br />

6. References<br />

Anonym (2001). Pogozdovanje krasa (reprint). Avtonomna dežela Furlanija Julijska krajina,<br />

Deželno ravnateljstvo za gozdove in parke, Trst<br />

Atkinson, I. (1979). The Viking Ships. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0 521 21951 5,<br />

Cambridge – London etc.<br />

Azarov, E. (1994). Črni bor na Krasu. Kras, No. 4, (1994), pp. 18-21, ISSN 1318-3257<br />

Cabanes, P. (2002). Iliri od Bardileja do Gencija. Svitava, ISBN 420228055, Zagreb<br />

Culiberg, M., Kaligarič, M., Lovrenčak, F., Seliškar, A., Zupančič, M. (1997). Soil &<br />

Vegetation. In: Slovene Classical Karst Kras. Kranjc, A., pp. 103-129, ZRC SAZU,<br />

ISBN 961-6182-42-0, Ljubljana<br />

Cvijić, J. (1966). Balkansko poluostrvo i južnoslovenske zemlje, Zavod za izdavanje učbenika SR<br />

Srbije, Beograd<br />

Cvijić, J. (2000). Karst, geografska monografija. In: J. Cvijić Sabrana dela. Knjiga I, Stevanović,<br />

Maletić, Ranković, Kulenović-Grujić, Jovanović, pp. 203-323, SANU & Zavod za<br />

izdavanje udžbenika SR Srbije, ISBN 86-17-08301-8, Beograd<br />

Djikić, S. (1957). Historiski razvoj devastacije i degradacije krša u Bosni i Hercegovini.<br />

Proceedings of Savezno savjetovanje o kršu, 3, Split, June-July 1957<br />

Dular, J., & Božič, D. (1999). Železna doba. In: Zakladi tisočletij, Aubelj, B., pp. 98-183,<br />

Modrijan, ISBN 961-6183-68-0, Ljubljana<br />

Evliya, Ç. (1957). Putopis, odlomci o Jugoslovenskim zemljama. Svjetlost, Sarajevo<br />

Gams, I. (1991). The origin of the term Karst in the time of transition of Karst (Kras) from<br />

deforestation to forestation. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Geografia, No. 13, (1991),<br />

pp. 1-8, ISSN 1120-9682


Dinaric Karst – An Example of Deforestation and Desertification of Limestone Terrain<br />

Gams, I., & Gabrovec, M. (1999). Land use and human impact in the Dinaric Karst. Int. J.<br />

Speleol., Vol. 28 B, No. 1/4, 55-70, ISSN 0392-6672<br />

Gašperšič, F., & Winkler, I. (1986). Ponovna ozelenitev in gozdnogospodarsko aktiviranje<br />

slovenskega krasa. Gozdarski vestnik, No. 5, pp. 169-183, ISSN 0017-2723<br />

Ginés, Á. (1999). Agriculture, grazing and land use changes at the Serra de Tramuntana<br />

karstic mountains. Int. J. Speleol., Vol. 28 B, No. 1/4, pp. 5-14, ISSN 0392-6672<br />

Goll, W. (1898). Die Karstaufforstung in Krain. Aufforstungs-Commission für Karstgebiet des<br />

Herzogthums Krain, Laibach<br />

Gruber, T. (1781). Briefe hydrographischen und physikalischen Inhalts aus Krain an Ignaz Edler<br />

von Born. Krauß, Wien<br />

Guttenberg, H. v. (1881). Der Karst und seine forstlichen Verhältnisse. Zeitschr. des Deutschen<br />

und oesterreichischen Alpenvereins, Vol. B XII, pp. 24-62<br />

Hacquet, B. (1785). Physikalisch-politische Reise aus den Dinarischen durch die Julischen,<br />

Carnischen, Rhätitschen in die Norischen Alpen im Jahre 1781 und 1783 unternommen<br />

von Hacquet. I-II, Adam Friedrich Böhme, Leipzig<br />

Horvat, A. (1957). Historiski razvoj devastacije i degradacije krša. Proceedings of Savezno<br />

savjetovanje o kršu, 2, Split, June-July 1957<br />

Jaić, M. (2010). Od Udbine preko Krbavskog polja do Laudonovog gaja. 30.08.2011,<br />

Available from:<br />

http://www.pustolovina.com/index.php?Itemid=55&catid=34:putopisi&id=46:od<br />

-udbine-preko-krbavskog-polja-do-laudonovog-gaja-<br />

&option=com_content&view=article<br />

Kranjc, A. (1979). Kras v povirju Ljubije. Geografski vestnik, Vol. 51, (1979), pp. 31-42. ISSN<br />

0350-3895<br />

Kranjc, A. (1999). Reafforestation of Kras – improvement or degradation. Proceedings of the<br />

International Seminar on Land Degradation and Desertification, ISBN 972-98331-0-9,<br />

Aveiro, August-September 1998<br />

Kranjc, A. (2002). The History of karst resources exploitation: an example of iron industry in<br />

Kranjska (Slovenia). Theoretical and Applied Karstology, Vol. 15, (2002), pp. 117-123,<br />

ISSN 1012-9308<br />

Kranjc, A. (2011). The Origin and evolution of the term „Karst“. Procedia Social and Behavioral<br />

Sciences, No. 19, (2011), 567-570 (www.sciencedirect.com)<br />

Liburna. (September 2011). In: Wikipedia. 01.10.2011, Available from:<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liburna<br />

Liburnians. (August 2011). In: Wikipedia, 22.08.2011, Available from:<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liburnians#cite_ref-25<br />

Mihevc, A. & Prelovšek, M. (2010). Geographical Position and General Overview, In:<br />

Introduction to the Dinaric Karst, Mihevc, Prelovšek, Zupan Hajna, pp. 6-8, Inštitut za<br />

raziskovanje krasa ZRC SAZU, ISBN 978-961-254-198-9, Postojna<br />

Mlinšek, D. (1993). Življenjski prostor “nizki kras”, primer človekove destruktivnosti,<br />

energije življenja, upanje v človeka in trajen raziskovalni laboratorij. Gozdarski<br />

vestnik, Vol. 51, No. 5-6, pp. 280-293, ISSN 0017-2723<br />

Murko, V. (1957). Josip Ressel: življenje in delo. Tehniški muzej Slovenije, Ljubljana<br />

Panjek, A. (2006). Človek, zemlja, kamen in burja. Založba Annales, ISBN 10961-6033-76-x,<br />

Koper<br />

93


94<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Papež, J. (1991). Kozjereja, In: Enciklopedija Slovenije, Ivanič, M., pp. 354, Mladinska knjiga,<br />

ISBN-86-11-14288-8, Ljubljana<br />

Pertot, M. (1989). Kraška gmajna se bo kmalu zarasla. Proteus, Vol. 52, No.2 (October 1989).,<br />

pp. 59-61, ISSN 0033-1805<br />

Piškorić, O. (1993). Josip Ressel u hrvatskom šumarstvu. Šumarski list, Vol. CXVII, pp. 489-<br />

506, ISSN 0373-1332<br />

Prašuma Lom (August 2011). In: Zvanična prezentacija opštine Petrovac, 22.08.2011,<br />

Available from http://www.drinic.rs.ba/lom.htm<br />

Rajšp. V. (Edit.). (1997). Slovenija na vojaških zemljevidih 1763 – 1787 (1804), 3, ZRC SAZU &<br />

ARS, ISBN 961-6182-013, Ljubljana<br />

Rajhenavski pragozd (August 2011). 22.08.2011, Available from<br />

http://www.zrsvn.si/sl/informacija.asp?id_meta_type=63&id_informacija=491<br />

Rjazancev, A. (1963). Vesti o bobovcih iz Julijskih Alp. Železar Tehnična priloga, Vol. 2, (1963),<br />

pp. 67-70<br />

Rubbia, K. (1912). Petindvajset let pogozdovanja na Kranjskem. Pogozdovalna komisija,<br />

Ljubljana<br />

Schmidl, A. (1854). Die Grotten und Höhlen von Adelsberg, Lueg, Planina und Laas. W.<br />

Braumüller, Wien<br />

Slapšak, B. (1995). Možnosti študija poselitve v arheologiji. Arheo, No. 17, (1995), pp. 2-90,<br />

ISSN 0351-5958<br />

Šercelj, A. (1996). Začetki in razvoj gozdov v Sloveniji (The Origins and Development of<br />

Forests in Slovenia). Dela-Opera Classis IV. SAZU, No. 35, pp. 1-142, ISSN 86-7131-<br />

102-3<br />

Turk, I., Modrijan, Z., Prus, T., Culiberg, M., Šercelj, A., Perko, V., Dirjec, J., & Pavlin, P.<br />

(1993). Podmol pri Kastelcu, Novo večplastno arheološko nahajališče na Krasu,<br />

Slovenija. Arheološki vestnik, Vol. 44, (1993), pp. 45-96, ISSN 0570-8966<br />

Velušček, A. (1999). Mlajša kamena in bakrena doba. In: Zakladi tisočletij, Aubelj, B., pp. 52-<br />

75, Modrijan, ISBN 961-6183-68-0, Ljubljana<br />

Valvasor, J. W. (1689). Die Ehre deß Herzogthums Crain. I. Th., W. M. Endter, pp. 696. Laibach<br />

– Nürnberg<br />

Wessely, J. (1876). Das Karstgebiet Militär-Kroatiens und seine Rettung, dann die Karstfrage<br />

überhaupt – Kras hrvatske krajine i kako da se spasi, za tiem kraško pitanje uploške. k.k.<br />

General-Commando in Agram, Agram<br />

Willis, K.J. (1994). The vegetational history of the Balkans. In: Science Direct - Quaternary<br />

Science Reviews, Vol. 13, No. 8, (1994), pp. 769-788, 18.08.2011, Available from:<br />

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027737919490104X<br />

Zupan Hajna, N. (2010). Geology, In: Introduction to the Dinaric Karst, Mihevc, Prelovšek,<br />

Zupan Hajna, pp. 14-19, Inštitut za raziskovanje krasa ZRC SAZU, ISBN 978-961-<br />

254-198-9, Postojna


1. Introduction<br />

Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

6<br />

Diandong Ren 1, Lance M. Leslie 2 and Qingyun Duan 3<br />

1 Australian Sustainability Institute, Curtin University, Perth,<br />

2 School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman,<br />

3 Beijing Normal University<br />

1 Australia<br />

2 USA<br />

3 People's Republic of China<br />

This study investigates landslide caused disturbances to ecosystem-vegetation burial and<br />

overturning of soil horizons which can accelerate vegetation loss, or even lead to complete<br />

deforestation of the landscape. A summary is presented of the historical development and<br />

recent advances in understanding and prediction of landslides/debris flows, which are<br />

major global natural hazards that have caused great loss of life and damage to property and<br />

infrastructure. The focus here is on rainfall triggered landslides/debris flows, and their<br />

deforestation effects. Debris flows have large destructive power because the solid and fluid<br />

forces interact within the sliding mass (Iverson 1997): the embedded boulders can exert<br />

great impulsive loads on objects they encounter; while the high fluid contents make debris<br />

flows travel long distances even in channels with modest slopes and therefore can inundate<br />

vast areas. Thus the whole spectrum of debris flows has deforestation effects (even small<br />

scale debris flows can denude vegetation). The first two sections of this chapter are<br />

concerned, respectively, with understanding ecosystems in terms of their soil and vegetation<br />

types, especially in regions that have sloping terrain. The emphasis is on the impact of<br />

landslides on deforestation, and this aspect has not yet been studied extensively. The third<br />

section focuses on the dynamics of landslides and provides a comprehensive description of<br />

their lifecycles, and the fourth section discusses the development and application of<br />

empirical and descriptive landslide models. Such models have contributed to knowledge of<br />

storm-triggered shallow landslides/debris flows. However, the deficiencies of empirical<br />

models are well-known and an alternative modelling technique, pioneered by the first<br />

author, is described in detail. This modeling approach is to solve the fully three<br />

dimensional, Navier-Stokes, and to that end a multi-rheological scalable, extensible geofluid<br />

model modeling system, known as SEGMENT, was developed. When coupled with a<br />

landslide model the system is called SEGMENT-landslide. The SEGMENT-landslide model<br />

has been used extensively in a predictive mode for both relatively short lead decadal times,<br />

and for century long predictions of landslides, in several very different locations. Here, the<br />

performance of SEGMENT-landslide is assessed for the Yangjiashan creeping slope in<br />

China, in predictive mode for the decade 2010-2109. Investigation of the impact of possible<br />

future precipitation morphological changes over this region utilizes 21st century simulations


96<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

from 17 Climate General Circulation Models. SEGMENT-landslide performed encouraging<br />

well in both hindcast and forecast mode, providing prior and future vulnerability of the<br />

Yangjiashan creeping slope to landslides and rainfall rate thresholds for sliding to occur.<br />

SEGMENT-landslide also has been used to estimate landslide potential in other vulnerable<br />

regions, including southern California. Future work will focus on the influence of a future<br />

warming on the occurrence of landslides. Knowledge of upcoming changes in precipitation<br />

morphology is critical for predicting storm-triggered landslides and desertification.<br />

Advanced dynamical models, such as SEGMENT-landslide, which have a physical basis, are<br />

needed to supplement documentation of landslide occurrence. As there are biogeochemical<br />

submodels coupled in the SEGMENT system, it can be used to investigate significant<br />

environmental consequences of landslides, notably deforestation.<br />

2. Ecosystem of sloping terrain, soil and vegetation<br />

A unique feature of terrestrial ecosystems is that vegetation acquires its resources from two<br />

very different environments; air (for CO2) and soil (for inorganic minerals of nutrients).<br />

Landslides cause disturbances to ecosystem productivity by displacing the soil mantle. In<br />

addition to be the medium in which most decomposer organisms and many animals live,<br />

the physical soil matrix provides a source of water and nutrients to plants and microbes and<br />

is the physical support system in which terrestrial vegetation is rooted. For these reasons,<br />

landslide displacement of the soil mantle has severe ecosystem consequences.<br />

Sloping terrain creates unique patterns of microclimates through surface energy budgets,<br />

hydrology and availability of nutrients. For example, slopes facing the equator receiving<br />

more solar radiation than opposing slopes and hence usually have warmer and drier<br />

conditions. In colder or moister climates, the warmer microclimate of the equator facing<br />

slopes provides conditions that enhance productivity, decomposition and other ecosystem<br />

processes (including the formation of soils), whereas in dry climates, the low moisture levels<br />

on these slopes limits such production. Further, microclimatic variations associated with<br />

slope and aspect allows stands of an ecosystem type to exist hundreds of kilometres beyond<br />

its major zone of distribution. These outlier populations are important sources of colonizing<br />

individuals during times of rapid climate change and are therefore important in<br />

understanding species migration and the long-term dynamics of ecosystems. Topography<br />

also influences climate through drainage of cold, dense air in the form of katabatic winds,<br />

forming strong near surface air temperature inversions. Inversions tend to be strongest at<br />

night and during winter, when there is less warming of the surface, either in the form of<br />

shortwave solar radiation or longwave thermal from clouds, and hence insufficient<br />

convective mixing to remove inversions. Inversions are climatologically important because<br />

they increase the seasonal and diurnal temperature extremes experienced by ecosystems in<br />

low-lying areas. In cool climates, inversions greatly reduce the length of the frost-free<br />

growing season. The third aspect of the impact of sloping surfaces on ecosystems is surface<br />

hydrology. The surface runoffs on sloped surfaces are much larger than over flat terrain. For<br />

dry climates, this places severe water-limitations on production. Before addressing the slope<br />

effects on nutrients, we will review the soil formation process.<br />

Under a given climatic regime, soil properties are the major control over ecosystem<br />

processes. Soils are the locality where geological and biological processes intersect. Soils<br />

mediate many of the key reactions in the giant global reduction-oxidation cycles of carbon,<br />

nitrogen and sulphur, and provide essential resources to biological processes that drive these


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

cycles. As the intersection of the bio-, geo- and chemistry in biogeochemistry, soils play such<br />

an integral role in ecosystem processes that it is impossible to separate the study of soils from<br />

that of ecosystem processes. Soils are formed from weathered metamorphic rocks. The<br />

presence of living organisms accelerates the soil formation processes. Water is a pathway for<br />

nutrients entering an ecosystem and also is crucial in determining whether the products of<br />

weathering accumulate or are lost from a soil, especially the soluble minerals. Top soils<br />

generally are more fertile because weathering rates generally are larger at the surface. Also,<br />

leaching processes tend to transfer soluble ions (e.g., chelated complexes of organic<br />

compounds, iron or aluminium ions from precipitation or released in the weathering of upper<br />

layers soil) downwards. During the downward movement, they can react with ions<br />

encountered at depth under new chemical environments (e.g., increased pH value), or may<br />

precipitate out the system when dehydration occurs (e.g., water is evaporated in semi-arid or<br />

arid climate zones). As a consequence the levels of silica and base cations in the secondary<br />

minerals usually increase with depth and result in a nutrient poor deeper soil horizon. As iron<br />

and aluminium ions soluted in the soil water move downwards, slight changes in ionic<br />

content and the microbial breakdown of the organic matter both can cause the metal ions to<br />

precipitate as oxides. The deeper soil horizon containing iron-rich minerals usually are<br />

hardened irreversibly. These layers can impede water drainage and root growth. This is the<br />

case for tropical iron-rich soils, and similar processes exist for calcium (or magnesium) soils of<br />

arid and semiarid temperate climate zones. The hard calcic horizon at depth is formed when<br />

calcium carbonate precipitation occurs under conditions of increased pH, or under saturation<br />

concentrations of carbonate with evaporation of soil moisture. If debris flows remove the<br />

fertile top soils, the deeper horizon is exposed and this layer has poor water retention ability<br />

and is nutrient poor. Moreover, roots cannot develop within it and thus cannot support regrowth.<br />

Even for the depositional alluvial fans, the exposed deep soil and deep buried top soil<br />

forms a nutrient sink for the ecosystem, as the majority of the roots can use nutrients only in<br />

the upper one or two meters.<br />

3. Landslides are double-edged swords<br />

The surface of the earth, both land and beneath the oceans, is continually being modified by<br />

mass movements operating in response to gravitational forces. In this sense, landslides<br />

reduce the hill slopes to stable angles. They can assume the form of rockfalls, slumps and<br />

slides, and debris flows (Cruden 1991). For this study, the term landslide includes<br />

downslope movement over a variety of scales and velocities and also includes those related<br />

to vegetation cover. Rainstorms always are the prime cause.<br />

Topography influences soil through its effects on climate and the differential transport of<br />

fine soil particles (Amundson and Jenny 1997). Characteristics such as soil depth, texture,<br />

and mineral content vary with hillslope position. Erosion processes, such as landslides,<br />

preferentially move fine-grained materials downslope and deposit them at lower locations.<br />

Depositional areas at the base of slopes and in valley bottoms therefore tend to have deep<br />

fine-textured soils with a high soil organic content and high water-holding capacity. These<br />

areas also supply more soil resources (water and nutrients) to plant roots and microbes and<br />

provide greater physical stability than do higher slope positions. For these reasons alluvial<br />

fans at valley bottoms typically exhibit higher rates of most ecosystem processes than do<br />

ridges or shoulders of slopes. In brief, soils in lower slope positions have greater soil<br />

moisture, more soil organic matter content, and higher rates of nitrogen mineralization and<br />

97


98<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

gaseous losses than upslope soils (Matson et al. 1991). Therefore, on geological timescales,<br />

landslides help produce stable land suitable for agricultural and habitation (for tropical<br />

islands, also tourism) and provide materials that form fertile plains and valleys, beaches,<br />

and barrier islands. However, on a scale typical of a human life span, the benefits accruing<br />

from landslides are overshadowed by their destructive characteristics; they are hazards that<br />

should be understood and mitigated as much as possible.<br />

While it is reasonable to generalize that landslide activity is important, landslide impact on<br />

deforestation, on ecosystems in general, have not been well addressed. The following<br />

comments are not an exhaustive review but are intended to indicate the relevance of<br />

landslides to deforestation.<br />

Fig. 1. Global distribution of Net Primary Production (NPP, color shading, in g/m 2/yr) and<br />

occurrence (red crosses) of storm-triggered landslides (2003-2007).<br />

The main geological hazards of volcanic activity, earthquakes and landslides are commonly,<br />

but not entirely, associated with processes occurring in areas near subduction zones. It is<br />

there that elevations are high enough to generate instability and sources of hazardous<br />

agents are abundant. This explains why the landslides belt coincides with the Earth’s major<br />

earthquake belts. The Himalayas, for example is a hot spot (Figure 1). Figure 1 shows the<br />

primary landslides that are deeper than 2.5 m thick and contain >10 5 m 3 of solid material,<br />

enough to cause vegetation damages. Plotted are the cases for years 2003-2007.<br />

Landslides are one type of geological hazard. Geological hazards become so only where<br />

population, services or structures are at risk. In this sense, although northwestern China is a<br />

hot spot for landslides, the low population, by itself, reduces the hazard to a vanishingly<br />

small likelihood. In contrast, <strong>India</strong> and Indonesia both have large populations under the<br />

threat of storm-triggered landslides. It is reported (BNBP, 2009) that during the period 1998-


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

2007, 569 landslide events took place in Indonesia which caused 1326 fatilities and around<br />

1500 people missing, around 170,000 people evacuated. In the humid tropics, soil loss after<br />

landslides are also very high as soil will be broken and exposed to rainfall wash-resulting in<br />

increased sediment load in the streams and causing flooding in low lying areas. As the<br />

population of vulnerable regions increases, previously unoccupied alluvial fans are used for<br />

habitation (e.g., the Zhouqu county in China) and landslide events therefore have a great<br />

potential to impact human settlements or activities.<br />

The state of California in the USA is a locality where the combined effects of earthquakes<br />

and landslides have been documented extensively. The precipitation of this region, being<br />

regularly affected by ENSO and potentially also sensitive to climate change, has a large<br />

uncertainty in the future occurrence of storm-triggered landslides (Ren et al. 2011b).<br />

From Figure 1, there are fewer landslide hazards for regions with NPP


100<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

After the soil is moistened, the cohesion between soil and the root surface is reduced greatly<br />

(to negligible strengths 50% granular material concentration, especially when boulders are<br />

entrained. Panels (b), (c) and (d) illustrate a full life cycle of the debris flow: (b) initiation, (c)<br />

sliding, and (d) cessation. Precipitation generated surface runoff washes the fine-grained<br />

material downslope. Because the steepness of the slope is graded (steep at top and gentler at<br />

the toe), granular material (saturated soils) are thicker toward the toe of the slope. As the<br />

sliding material run downslope, it entrains the pebbles and small stones (granular material) at<br />

the bottom. This will significantly change its rheological properties as it becomes drier and<br />

more viscous. The sliding material eventually ceases at places with gentle slopes, or where the<br />

slope angle reverses. In the lowest inset panel, the cracked rice paddy is indicative of effects of<br />

roots on holding the soil particles together: almost all rice bundles are located at the centers of<br />

the cracked cells. Major cracks rarely run directly across a bundle of rice sprouts.


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

Water typically leaves a landscape by one of several pathways: groundwater flow, shallow<br />

subsurface flow, or overland flow (when precipitation rate exceeds infiltration rate). The<br />

relative importance of these pathways is strongly influenced by topography, vegetation, and<br />

material properties such as the hydraulic conductivity of soils. Drainage (ground water) and<br />

shallow subsurface flow dissolve and remove ions and small particles that cement large soil<br />

particles when being dry. Overland flow (runoff) causes erosion primarily by surface sheet<br />

wash, rills and rain splash. Runoff is strong for bared ground (e.g., arid soil-mantled<br />

landscapes) or disturbed ground (by soil animals or human construction). Runoff of 3 mm/s<br />

suffices to suspend clay and silt particles and move them downhill (Selby 1993). As water<br />

collects in gullies, its velocity, and therefore erosion potential, increases. For clear (not<br />

1/2 1/3<br />

0.27<br />

dense) debris flow, erosion potential can be approximated as a C1gh D/ D0<br />

,<br />

where C1 is a coefficient depending on vegetation condition, α is slope, D is particle size and<br />

D0 is a reference particle size, h is runoff water depth, and g is gravity acceleration.<br />

Vegetation and litter layers level/spread out the peak of runoff and increase infiltration and<br />

drainage through reducing velocity with which raindrop hit the soil, thereby preventing<br />

surface compaction, and through the inter-connected channels webbed by roots and soil<br />

animals. For progressive bulking debris flows, these are apparent preventative features. To<br />

evaluate the ecosystem consequence of landslides, we also need to know the size of a<br />

landslide. It is apparent that the disturbance of landslides to ecosystem is through<br />

displacement of the fertile top soil layer. Whether or not the existing vegetation can be<br />

destroyed depends on the severity of the landslide. The severity of a landslide depends on<br />

its size, velocity and material composition. The first two points are obvious. The<br />

composition of the sliding material is important for landslide destructive potential primarily<br />

because the size of granular material. If the debris flow entrained big boulders during its<br />

downslope movement, the destructive potential to trees and buildings will be much greater<br />

than similar debris flows containing only sands and silts. The drag of debris flows to<br />

U<br />

obstructions can be expressed as eff Z<br />

<br />

, where U is flow speed, eff is effective dynamic<br />

<br />

viscosity (Pa•s). For a fast flow debris flows (3 m/s) and 50% solid material sludge of about<br />

2 meter depth, the stress exerted on obstacles is on the order of 105 Pa. When a large boulder<br />

encounters an obstacle, the energy is transformed primarily in the form of longitudinal<br />

waves (e.g., similar to acoustic waves in the air). The stress (pressure) impact on the obstacle<br />

is 0.5 bUV , with V the sound wave speed in solids (obstacle medium, at standard pressure<br />

of 1 atmosphere and temperature 25 °C, about 4500 m/s for bridges and concrete-steel<br />

buildings), and b<br />

is the boulder’s density. In contrast to turbid sludges, a boulder of about 2<br />

m 2 cross-sectional area (assuming this also is the area of simultaneous contact with an<br />

obstacle), of bulk density of 2.7×10 3 kg/m 3, can exert 10 8 pa pulse pressure, which is three<br />

orders of magnitude larger than the sludge.<br />

Figure 2 is a conceptual sketch of storm-triggered landslides/debris flows. Clearly there is<br />

usually a large (one order of magnitude larger than the channelled, streaming, concentrated<br />

flows of the dense mud) collection region, providing solid material for the downstream area.<br />

Along the flow, the sliding material is denser and viscosity is larger. At the spread region,<br />

because of the gained kinetic energy, it will not stop even the slope angle is less than the<br />

repose angle. In actuality, it continues to spread until the speed is reduced to zero, usually at<br />

bed slopes much smaller than the stable repose angle. In Figure 2, panel (a) is a plane view<br />

101


102<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

of the mass collecting region, panels (b) to (d) illustrate the life cycle of a debris flow. We see<br />

that the solid material is collected by surface runoff from a much larger area than seen with<br />

naked eye as mudslide. The portion with direct ecosystem damage primarily is the region<br />

with concentrated stream flows, which typically constitutes only about 2% of the entire<br />

collecting area.<br />

The August 8, 2010 Zhouqu landslide is a characteristic ‘progressive bulking’ type of debris<br />

flow. On August 7, Zhouqu’s Beishan slope received over 80 cm of rain within two hours,<br />

leading to widespread shallow landslides and debris flow generation. The town of Zhouqu<br />

is built on the sloping surfaces of previous debris fans formed at the base of steep rocky<br />

hillslopes.<br />

The debris fan at the mouth of the rocky creek, Sanyanyu, is usually stable because of the<br />

elaborated root system laced through the stony, loose soil. Prior to the intense cloudbursts,<br />

there was a long period of drought in the region and the ground surface was cracked,<br />

especially the mid-slope (1200-2500 m elevation range). In addition to causing rock falls<br />

(providing more solid sliding material), the Wenchuan earthquake, barely two years earlier,<br />

deepened the bedrock crevasses. Consequently, the drought stressed vegetation cover had<br />

little ability to intercept the rainfall and dampen the peak runoff. Much of the runoff water was<br />

channelled directly into the crevasses and deepened the shear zone. As the runoff water<br />

flowed down slope, it progressively increased the solid material contents (as a result of<br />

entrainment) and also its ability to further entrain. This positive feedback continues and at<br />

elevation of 2500 m, large boulders of 1 meter diameter can be picked up by the turbid mud.<br />

As water filled the crevasses, patches of soil layers up to 4 meters were made unstable and<br />

were scoured out and descended along rock creeks. The scoured was generally still dry<br />

(actually only the surface several centimetres are saturated). As it ran down the steep canyon,<br />

it further picked up debris as it travelled at ~5 m/s. By the time it reached lower, gentler slopes<br />

(~1200 m elevation), its mass had increased by one order of magnitude, but the overall water<br />

content was still low. Some parts (the finer granular components) simply came to a halt. The<br />

coarse granular material and boulders continued their motion and smashed into constructions<br />

at the mouth of the rocky creek. Subsequently, material disturbed by the slide, including wood<br />

and constructions, was washed by following slides and moved down the Sanyanyu creek,<br />

depositing debris all the way to the Bailongjiang River. This tragedy, and others in the<br />

previous rainy seasons following the Wenchuan earthquake, led to the awareness of the need<br />

to develop warning system, compile hazard maps, and adopt new legislation concerning forest<br />

practice and soil reservation, for regions on active faults.<br />

5. A recently developed landslide dynamics model: SEGMENT-landslide<br />

Because of their frequent occurrence, storm-triggered shallow landslides/debris flows have<br />

been actively studied. Empirical and descriptive landslide models have contributed much to<br />

the public awareness of landslide hazards and have led to valuable accumulated experience<br />

in identifying the key causal factors (Caine 1980; Cannon and Ellen 1985; Sirangelo and<br />

Versace 1996; Godt et al. 2006). Caine (1980) proposed the seminal rainfall intensity-duration<br />

threshold line, above which shallow landslides may occur (ID method hence forth), based<br />

on 73 landslides worldwide.<br />

In intensity-duration thresholds, a dataset consisting of rainfall intensity (I, mm/day) and<br />

rainfall duration (D, hr) of landslide events is first made/prepared. A scatter graph is then<br />

generated with rainfall duration as x-axis and rainfall intensity as y-axis. The equation of


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

rainfall threshold is a power-law curve that fit the points in the scatter plot (actually a lower<br />

envelope in that is a point lies to the right upper of the curve, landslides may occur), usually<br />

b<br />

take the form I aD <br />

, where a and b are positive constants that vary with soil, vegetation<br />

and land use.<br />

Godt et al. (2006) suggested that landslide-triggering rainfall must be considered in terms of<br />

its relationship with antecedent rainfall. For example, a heavy rainfall event within a dry<br />

period is not likely to trigger shallow landslides, while the opposite is true for lighter<br />

rainfall within a wet period. As it directly affects soil moisture conditions, Godt et al. (2006)<br />

correctly claim that antecedent rainfall must be included in an empirical model’s assessing<br />

of a rainfall’s potential in causing landslide. Godt et al. (2006) therefore is a significant<br />

improvement over Caine’s (1980) seminal rainfall intensity-duration threshold line<br />

approach. The antecedent rainfall index is usually defined as a red noise of the accumulative<br />

rainfall amount 3 days (for tropics) and 7 days (temperate climate zone) prior the landslide<br />

event. Recent empirical methods also compile many soil hydrological parameters by using<br />

water-balance models with little physical basis but are convenient for estimating soil<br />

moisture conditions. For example, Godt et al. (2006) uses a detailed assessment of rainfall<br />

triggering conditions, hill slope hydrologic properties, soil mechanical properties, and slope<br />

stability analyses. The accumulation of sliding material is a slow process (either rockfalls or<br />

aeolian processes or damaging erosion processes from weathering) compared with the<br />

sliding. Previous sliding will reshape the sliding material profile and may even completely<br />

remove the sliding layer. These will increase the stability of the slope and a similar rainfall<br />

amount may cause sliding on a reduced scale, or not at all. Thus, the empirical parameters (a<br />

and b) in the ID approach vary not only spatially but also temporally. In this sense, all<br />

previous ID approaches still lack the important time varying features.<br />

A synthetic consideration of preparatory and triggering factors, however, demands a more<br />

comprehensive modeling of the physical processes involved in landslides (Costa, 1984;<br />

Iverson, 1997). The overview by Iverson (1997) suggested several criteria for dynamic<br />

landslide models, including that a model should be capable of simulating the full startmovement-spread-cessation<br />

cycle of the detached material, and should cover a wide<br />

spectrum of debris flows. With continued growth and expansion of human population, raintriggered<br />

shallow landslides increasingly result in loss of life and significant economic cost.<br />

From an ecological viewpoint, landslides are an important factor in desertification over<br />

mountainous regions because they are very effective in transferring biomass from live to<br />

dead respiring pools (Ren et al., 2009).<br />

Along these lines of walking, there are physically-based slope stability models to simulate<br />

the transient dynamical response of pore pressure to spatiotemporal variability of rainfall<br />

(e.g., Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-based Regional Slope-Stability Analysis—<br />

TRIGRS, Baum et al. 2008); commercially available numerical modeling codes for<br />

geotechnical analysis of soil, rock and structural support in three dimensions (e.g., FLAC-<br />

3D, www.itascacg.com/flac3d), and fully three dimensional, full Navier-Stokes and multirheological<br />

modeling systems such as the scalable, extensible geo-fluid model, known as<br />

SEGMENT (Ren et al., 2008; Ren et al., 2009, Ren et al. 2010; Ren et al. 2011a,b).<br />

Slope stability models are based on the following reasoning: On a sloping surface, the<br />

gravitational force can be partitioned into a component normal to the slope (Fn),<br />

contributing to friction that resists sliding erosion, and a component parallel to the slope (Fp)<br />

that promotes sliding. A stability parameter, S, is defined as SF / F , where is the<br />

n p<br />

103


104<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

internal friction coefficient. This is the general form of S, but there are many specific forms,<br />

based on the fact that, landslides, as the movement of a mass of rock, debris or earth<br />

downslope (Cruden 1991; Dai et al. 2002), occurs when shear stress (Fp) is higher than shear<br />

strength (i.e., when S


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

<br />

0.5<br />

as I d/( S/<br />

) , where d is particle diameter and s is the particle density. Soil<br />

e s<br />

moisture enhancement factor on viscosity is assumed varying according a sigmoid curve<br />

formally as Eq. (9) of Sidle (1992) but with the time decay term replaced by relative<br />

saturation.<br />

As derivatived from Eq. (1), the prognostic equation for surface elevation, h(x,y), is<br />

h <br />

VH hw <br />

top<br />

top<br />

t<br />

0<br />

Where X indicates evaluation at the free surface elevation. In the case with slope<br />

top<br />

movements, Eq. (4) is solved regularly to update the sliding material geometry. The w terms<br />

may include sedimentation rate and entrainment rate. Once the material is entrained inside<br />

the sliding material, it changes the rheological property of the medium and is advected<br />

within the sliding material.<br />

The viscous term in Eq. (2) implies an energy conversion from kinetic energy to heat. To<br />

make a full closure of energy, we need the following thermal equation:<br />

T 2 2<br />

c ( V) T kT eff<br />

(5)<br />

t<br />

<br />

Where c is heat capacity (J/kg/K), T is temperature (K), κ is thermal conductivity (W/K/m),<br />

and σeff is effective stress (Pa). The last term is ‘strain heating’, which is the converting of<br />

work done by gravity into heat affecting the sliding material by changing viscosity or<br />

causing a phase change. Above is the landslide component of SEGMENT-landslides. Other<br />

components are shown in Fig. 3.<br />

To describe the full start-slide-stop cycle, we boundle internal stress tensor as<br />

E<br />

105<br />

C S <br />

(6)<br />

, where gh<br />

is the gravitational potential, C is effective cohesion, and E the pressure<br />

perturbation caused by earthquake or human-induced disturbances at that location. µ<<br />

µ1=tgф, with ф granular repose angle. For conditions with ground water, hydrostatic<br />

pressure is usually included in S for convenience. The extreme values of the middle two<br />

terms on the right hand side are the yielding strength (shear strength) of the sliding<br />

material f C Sf(with<br />

subscript ‘f’ means failure). Note that, in addition to be soil<br />

moisture and soil chemical components dependent, C and are functions of shear stress<br />

(e.g., Schofield 2006). For unfractured bedrock, C is the dominant term, usually three orders<br />

of magnitudes larger than the remaining three terms combined together. For most of the soil<br />

(except pure sandy soil), cohesion and internal friction are both important in maintaining<br />

stability slopes. For fractured rocks and sandy soils, the internal friction becomes dominant<br />

term (not necessarily larger than gravitational potential, though. But, it is the horizontal<br />

gradient of the gravitational potential that caused motion, not the bulk term). When<br />

vegetation roots are involved, the mechanical effects are included in cohesion. Note that it is<br />

the interaction of distributed roots and the surrounding soil particles, not merely the<br />

(4)


106<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

additive of root tensile strength and soil cohesion. In a certain way, it is like the iron web<br />

reinforcement inside concrete, except that soil moisture does not play a role in the concrete<br />

case for shear strength.<br />

The system described by Eqs. (1-6) is most suitable for study either deep-seated rotational<br />

landslides or shallow or storm-triggered debris flows. It is also convenient to investigate the<br />

positive feedback between deforestation, land use changes, undercutting of slope for road<br />

construction and expansion of settlement areas and landslides. For example, the effects of<br />

vegetation can be fully considered in this modelling system. The weight loading is set as<br />

upper stress boundary. The hydrological effects manifest in the parameterization of<br />

viscosity (dissolve of certain chemical bonds in clay soils, effects on cohesion and internal<br />

friction for sandy soils), the pore pressure adjustments of the spherical part of the stress<br />

tensor, and (minor) changes to the loading corresponding to the soil water weight (Smith<br />

and Petley 2008). The mechanical properties of the roots are implemented in the effective<br />

cohesion. The water distribution effects of vegetation roots are parameterized in a land<br />

surface sub-model. This sub-mode provides the soil moisture conditions for the sliding submodel.<br />

These explain how antecedent rainfall influence the saturation of soil and ground<br />

water level for a vegetated slope and its instability (Crosta 1998; van Asch et al. 1999) and<br />

provide a solid basis for discussing deforestation effect on landslide and the positive<br />

feedback that lead to further deforestation. Interestingly, ID empirical approach and the<br />

slope stability models are various forms of reduced form of the above equation set. For<br />

example, if the time dependence is neglected and three dimensional topography reduced to<br />

only including x-z plane, the governing equations can be written as (in component form):<br />

xx<br />

xz<br />

<br />

0<br />

x z<br />

<br />

xz zz<br />

g0 x z<br />

Further simplify the slope geometry to be of constant bedrock slope (α) and uniform sliding<br />

material thickness (thus, surface slope also is α), the volume integration of equations (7) and<br />

(8) yield<br />

GCeff Lsin / Sutgsin / Sv/ cos tgsin / Ssin<br />

<br />

eff eff v <br />

<br />

C L G C Lsin / S u tg sin / S / cos tg sin / S u tg / S<br />

cos E u0 h<br />

where u is the hydrostatic pressure from ground water, v is the net vertical support at top<br />

and toe (determined by boundary conditions), h is the horizontal support evaluated at top<br />

and toe, and E is the horizontal force exerted during earthquake. Eq. (9) indicates that<br />

slope stability is influenced by various factors, such as slope gradient ( ), soil properties<br />

(implicit in G, Ceff and ), ground water table and geomorphology (u and the boundary<br />

conditions). As for triggering mechanism, it not only include the storm trigger (excessive<br />

rainfall), but also the earthquake and volcanic activity ( E ).<br />

In the case without ground water and no effects of earthquake, taken the form<br />

(7)<br />

(8)<br />

(9)


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

SGCeff Lsin / cos tgsin / Stg <br />

eff eff sin / cos sin <br />

C L S G C L S tg tg<br />

, as discussed in the review of slope stability model in the previous subsection.<br />

Similarly, rainfall intensity-duration methods (IDs) based on the soil moisture sensitivity of<br />

the resistive terms (the middle two terms on the right hand side of Eq. (6)). Sliding material<br />

are a structured mixture, with particular spacing patterns and arrangements, of solid<br />

particles, pore water and, in some cases, cementitious material accumulated at particleparticle<br />

contacts. In addition to factors such as the electrical charge of the particles, and the<br />

chemistry of pore water, the chemical bonds are the key to the soil yield strength. As an<br />

example, there are the cementation-particles connected through a solid substance, such as<br />

recrystallized calcium carbonate formed in dry climate when seeping water experience new<br />

environments of high pH value and (or) the solvent get evaporated, as mentioned in Section<br />

1. Soil water, especially of acidic pH value (


108<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

5000 landslides and ~3600 rock falls. The massive amount of potential energy was<br />

transferred into heat and enhanced local convection. The following storms incurred ~358<br />

debris flows, resulted in a direct economic loss of near $US60 billion. SEGMENT thus<br />

simultaneously solves the thermal equation, the dynamic equations and the surface<br />

kinematic (continuity) equations.<br />

Fig. 3. Conceptual framework of SEGMENT-landslide for the projection of storm-induced<br />

landslides. The numerical techniques, model physics, input and output parameters are<br />

described in Ren et al. (2010b). The model has wide applications in many other geophysical<br />

flows including glaciers and ice-sheets, snow and mud avalanches, soil and coastal erosion, sea<br />

level change following ocean bottom tsunami, and pyroclastic flows such as magma from<br />

volcanic eruptions. The land surface model component considers hydrological processes of<br />

soils and vegetation. The mechanical properties of roots and the biomass loading also are<br />

implemented in the landslide model component.Adapted from Ren et al. 2011a.<br />

SEGMENT, because it synthetically simulates landslides over a continuous regional area,<br />

can, in principle, minimize the false-alarm tendency of most empirical procedures. Against<br />

the 2007 wild fire-burn background, using the observed precipitation, SEGMENT simulated<br />

the landslide cases during year 2008 for a region with documented landslides (Ren et al.<br />

2011b). Inserting the landslide model component into a scalable and extensible system (Fig.<br />

3) also makes implementation of newly identified physical processes more convenient. This


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

advantage is apparent in a recent simulation of Zhouqu landslides, where SEGMENT<br />

satisfactorily demonstrated why rainfall intensity is a critical factor affecting slope stability<br />

for cracked slopes.<br />

For investigating environmental issues, the landslide model is inserted into the generalized<br />

scalable, extensible modelling system (SEGMENT). To illustrate the viability of SEGMENTlandslide,<br />

a case study is presented of a landslide in Yanjiashan of Hubei province, China.<br />

6. Case study for the Yangjiashan creeping slope<br />

SEGMENT-landslide uses the data typically required by a sophisticated land surface<br />

scheme. In addition to a surface elevation map and bedrock topography, the model also<br />

requires as input various geo-mechanical parameters such as cohesion, angle of repose<br />

(dry), density, porosity, field capacity, and saturated hydraulic conductivity. SEGMENTlandslide<br />

also requires a vegetation weight mask and a root distribution profile.<br />

Detailed geological surveys are conducted only for areas with important infrastructure in<br />

danger of destruction by natural hazards. Fortunately, we have access to one such geological<br />

dataset for a small region along the Qingjiang River, a tributary of the Changjiang River. The<br />

Yangjiashan creeping slope (YC) in China, is located at 29°50’ N and 109°14’ E (see Fig. 4). In<br />

addition to a recently detailed geological map, we also performed an engineering study of the<br />

soil and rock profiles from bore-hole drilling, extracting soil samples for laboratory testing<br />

(Table 1), and continuous displacement measurements within the creeping zone (Fig. 5). The<br />

shear strengths of the various materials present in the region also have been obtained. Both<br />

drained and non-drained shearing tests are carried out on the soil specimens (Table 1). In<br />

addition to recovering creeping zone rock and fluid for laboratory analyses, intensive downhole<br />

geophysical measurements and long-term monitoring provided the following<br />

information: the composition and geomechanical properties of active creeping zone rocks; the<br />

nature of the stresses responsible for sliding; and the role of pressurized water in controlling<br />

landslides recurrence, for field conditions with a wide dynamic range. Displacement surveys<br />

have been carried out continuously since July 2007, using the RST-IC3500 digital inclinometer.<br />

Displacement data from five boreholes (see Fig. 4, BH6-9) are analyzed in this study. The<br />

boreholes are labeled BH6, BH7, BH8, BH8-1, and BH9 (see Table 1).<br />

The YC region has a sub-tropical moist climate, with a typical monsoonal precipitation<br />

pattern. The annual mean precipitation ranges between 1100 and 1900 mm. This section of<br />

the Yangjiashan Mountains, because of its proximity to a dam, is well-instrumented and<br />

thus is an ideal region to verify the numerical model, which calculates the roles of pore<br />

pressure, biomass loading and root distribution, and the intrinsic friction of the stress<br />

distribution. In this region the major slides are preceded by creeping movements. Since the<br />

1960s, the YC slope has experienced repeated failures, as a result of exceptionally heavy<br />

rainfall periods in 1960, 1980 and 1997. During a storm in July 1997, very heavy rainfall fell<br />

over 2-3 days and caused substantial erosion in one small canyon. Field studies indicate that<br />

after a major rainstorm toe-slope failure occurs first, reducing the stability of the upper<br />

slope, and the failure then moves gradually to the upper slopes. The scenario therefore is<br />

that towards the end of a heavy rain storm, a block of material was undercut by the stream<br />

and moved into the canyon, its downhill movement left an unsupported upslope block<br />

which followed the movement. This, in turn, was followed by a third block as the movement<br />

retrogressed up the slope<br />

109


110<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 4. Topographic map of Yangjiashan Creeping (YC) slope (the upper map shows its<br />

location in China). Contours are surface elevation (m). Borehole locations are labeled with a<br />

red circle (e.g., BH06-9). Color shading indicates surface maximum attainable creeping<br />

speeds larger than 1mm/s, after a 50-year recurrence storm event. The primary sliding<br />

direction (red arrow) is determined according to subsiding and swelling belts. The X- and Yaxis<br />

are distances from the SE corner (29.9N, 109.1 E).<br />

The Yangjiashan community is situated on hills composed of inter-bedded siltstones and<br />

sandstones, occasionally interspersed with altered clay layers. The rocks range from highly to<br />

completely weathered at the ground surface. The weathered rocks date from the Paleozoic and<br />

Mesozoic eras, the 200-900 m thick yellowish interbedded sandstone and siltstone dates from


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

the Silurian period, and the grey siltstone is from the Triassic period. The infiltration of rainfall<br />

through macro pores, which are well-developed in the soil and rock mass, plays a critical role<br />

in slope stability. The hills intersect with canyons in which increased erosion takes place<br />

during the spring and fall rainy seasons. Although many of the drainage patterns in this<br />

region have been altered by human activity, thereby increasing the slope stability, some<br />

remain unchanged, even in the inhabited areas (eastern part of the slope).<br />

Young’s<br />

modulus<br />

E(GPa)<br />

Poisson’s<br />

raioμ<br />

density<br />

ρ(kg/m 3)<br />

cohesion<br />

C(MPa)<br />

Insitu rock and soils 0.16 0.24 2150 0.38 20<br />

Slip-surface material 0.032 0.32 1950 0.04 16<br />

Middle/lightly<br />

weathered mudstone<br />

1.6 0.2 2600 1.6 28<br />

internal<br />

friction<br />

angle φ(°)<br />

Table 1. Geomechanical observations and parameters obtained by field surveys and laboratory<br />

tests of saturated specimens. Rock strength and deformation properties are obtained from triaxial<br />

compression tests using INSTRON-1346. Four saturated specimens of each layer were<br />

tested. During tests, confining pressure was applied step-wise in 3 MPa increment (i.e., 3, 6, 9,<br />

and 12 MPa), and vertical load are applied at displacement rate at 0.1 mm/s.<br />

6.1 A prediction for the Yangjiashan slope for the 2010-2019 decade<br />

The Triassic siltstone of YC is especially sensitive to pore pressure changes. Because of the<br />

complicated stratification, the model is initialized with five borehole soil/rock profiles (18-<br />

50 m depths within the granular soil mantle), with a horizontal resolution of 10 m in<br />

delineating the 3000 m by 5500 m simulation domain. In order to reduce spurious numerical<br />

boundary effects, the simulation domain encompasses the entire region shown in Fig. 4. The<br />

sliding material forms a characteristic alluvial fan, that is with the down-slope section<br />

thicker than the upslope section. A thin plate splines (Burrough and McDonnell, 2004)<br />

interpolator is used to obtain a sliding mass depth distribution over the grid.<br />

In the YC site, there are three model sub-layers to delineate the sliding mass, and one layer<br />

to represent the montmorillonite, within which sub-layers 10-12 are assumed to define the<br />

slip surface. This is further supported by the creep monitoring data (Fig. 5). This layer has<br />

the same chemical composition as the overlying layer but is physically fractured. We use 3<br />

sub-layers to delineate the regolith layer because, although only ~1 m deep, it is the critical<br />

layer controlling water infiltration into the creeping slide mass. As it represents granular<br />

material under high confining pressure, the viscosity of this thin bed of finer-grained<br />

materials is smaller than that of the adjacent layers. The deep underlying rock layer is<br />

divided into 7 sub-layers, with mechanical properties specified from laboratory test results.<br />

As a link between strain and stress, viscosity Eq. (3) is the most important parameter in<br />

continuum modeling of slope movement. Under the same pressure gradient force, the<br />

smaller the viscosity, the faster the creeping rate. Non-fractured rocks have viscosity as high<br />

as 10 19 Pa•s. The creeping rate thus is minimal for non-fractured rocks. Fractured rocks<br />

(granular material), can have viscosities 10 orders of magnitude smaller, depending on<br />

confining pressure and lubrication condition (usually water content under natural<br />

conditions). A creeping curve indicates that the vertical flow shear is very large within the<br />

granular layer. Above and below the granular layer, flow shear is much smaller. For a non-<br />

111


112<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

slip lower boundary condition, the creeping rate usually is imperceptible (below 53 m in<br />

Fig.5) before reaching the granular layer.<br />

Fig. 5. The observed (markers) and modeled (lines with same style) displacement-time<br />

curves for BH8.<br />

The absence of vegetative root strength binding soils increases susceptibility to sliding in<br />

loose soil on steep slopes during intense rainstorms (Dietrich and Perron 2006). Extra<br />

biomass loading also may contribute to slope instability during wet seasons. Ground surface<br />

biomass loading information for YC, because of its limited extent of only ~20 km 2, was<br />

collected by a geological survey team following a request by the first author.<br />

Using mean annual soil moisture conditions (obtained from NCEP/NCAR reanalyses,<br />

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.surfacefluxes.html), a<br />

creeping rate is simulated using the SEGMENT model near BH8 of 17, 17.2, 16.2, 8.5, 5.2 and<br />

3.1 mm/yr respectively at 1.5, 3, 10, 30, 40 and 45 m depths, agreeing well with the observed<br />

measurements. The root mean squared error, when compared with the 108 measurement<br />

data grids, is overestimated by only 0.42 mm/year, well within instrumental error range.<br />

The depth of the sliding surface (49 m at this location) is accurately delineated. Sliding will<br />

eventually accelerate along this plane of weakness, which is composed of highly fractured<br />

sandy shale. Interestingly, under natural conditions, the creeping speed curve is not a<br />

simple dilatant profile: there are local minima/maxima. The faster creeping locations near


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

the surface in the curves are partially due to the low viscosity of this layer and partially due<br />

to the uneven surface loading in the down-slope direction of the borehole. At the time of this<br />

study, measurements are available only up to March 27, 2008.<br />

The displacement curve is assessed for January 1, 2010 based on the climatological<br />

precipitation over the region (see Fig. 5). The basal sliding attributed to the Wenchuan<br />

earthquake of 2008 also was taken into account. Compared with the initial measurements,<br />

the shallow level displacements are as large as 18 mm. Based on our analysis of the effects of<br />

the Wenchuan earthquake on the YC creeping slope, the creep soon will accelerate. The<br />

Wenchuan earthquake reduced the natural creeping period by at least five years. For a<br />

crevasse near BH06, the surface crack enlarged from 10 to 18 cm. If the crack geometry is<br />

assumed to be constant, the crack depth almost doubles. Estimated depth changes were<br />

made of other cracks. The changes in its natural sliding cycle are obtained by comparing its<br />

creeping speed under current conditions with the pre-quake conditions. For example, after a<br />

major slope adjustment, say in 1998, it is assumed that there are no cracks due to strain. In<br />

2008, before the earthquake, the cracks are already monitored. They all are located at model<br />

locations with large strain rates. The natural cycle is not difficult to estimate; 1mm/day is<br />

the critical value for next major sliding event. Even if there is little change in the<br />

precipitation morphology, over the next ten years there likely will be significant slope<br />

movements. However, if there is an intense rainstorm with over 150 mm/day at any time in<br />

the future period, then sliding becomes imminent.<br />

Three historical landslides (1960, 1980 and 1997) reported in the YC study area are separated<br />

by ~20 years (Fig. 6). In 1960 and 1997, high annual precipitation values of 1819 and 1771<br />

mm, respectively, were recorded. However, 1980 was relatively dry with 1200 mm total<br />

precipitation compared to 1600 and 1360 mm respectively for 1979 and 1981. Examination of<br />

the daily precipitation series from 1979 and 1980 indicates that in 1979 over 90% of the<br />

annual precipitation occurred in the latter half of the year, with no significant precipitation<br />

before June. Although the total precipitation for 1980 is small, the heavy precipitation in<br />

January 1980 immediately following the previous year’s precipitation events formed an<br />

extended wet period. There was a significant precipitation event in January, reaching a rate<br />

of 58.3 mm/day that lasted 4.7 hours on January 15. As a result, the deep soil moisture (0.23<br />

volume per total volume) remained relatively high for the remaining several months. What<br />

triggered the landslide was a very heavy precipitation event of a 100-year recurrence<br />

frequency, with a single day precipitation of 230 mm on June 11th.<br />

For storm-triggered landslides, those precipitation events separated by less than two dry<br />

days can be considered as one single ‘super’ rain event. Thus, unlike many previous studies<br />

(e.g., O’Gorman and Schneider 2009), which count daily precipitation one day at a time<br />

(traditional precipitation analysis), we count those extended super-rain-events, defined as a<br />

somewhat continuous rainfall period nowhere separated by more than two consecutive dry<br />

days (rain-event analysis, Ren et al. 2011a). Figure 6 compares two methods of rainfall<br />

analyses. Using a traditional analysis, the 1997 slide does not correspond any significant<br />

daily rainfall event (>100 mm/day). However, following Ren et al. (2011), all major<br />

landslides (red arrows in Fig. 6) are triggered by rain events with higher rainfall totals. For<br />

the YC, heavy precipitation is both an enhancement factor, and a determining factor, in<br />

triggering landslides. However, current observational data are less than 2 years long, which<br />

is far too short to unambiguously resolve this hypothesis. SEGMENT-landslide simulations<br />

indicate that, under long term mean soil moisture conditions, the creeping will achieve a<br />

near-surface movement rate of 0.1 mm/day near the head of the slope, sometime within the<br />

113


114<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

next 40 years. Ironically, this creeping rate may never have been realized during the<br />

previous half-century. It has been interrupted by heavy rain storms and, consequently,<br />

slides have occurred before this movement rate ever was reached.<br />

Fig. 6. (a) Daily precipitation and (b) rain event analyses, with the three major historical<br />

landslides indicated by red arrows. In panel (a) the daily rainfall time series reveals that that<br />

the 1997 event was not an intense rainfall event but was composed of two consecutive<br />

rainfall events over several days. In panel (b), rainfall totals are plotted for each rain event,<br />

by calculating the cumulative rainfall for each rain event and placing the total at the center<br />

of the start and end times. In panel (b), it is clear that both the 1980 and the 1997 events<br />

correspond to large total rainfall events. However, large rainfall totals alone do not<br />

necessarily trigger slope movements but, as discussed in the text, result from the combined<br />

effects of a number of factors. There is a lack of observed daily precipitation prior to 1970 to<br />

perform similar analyses. The inset of panel (a) is the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis monthly<br />

precipitation data. For example, the year 1960 not only had intense August precipitation, it<br />

also followed immediately after 1959, which was a very wet year.<br />

For a storm with a 50-year recurrence frequency (~170 mm/day) more than 80% of the total<br />

water mass is channeled to the sliding surface through macro-pores, so movement rates can<br />

become dramatic toward the end of such a storm. The areas of significant deformation (i.e.<br />

maximum attainable surface sliding speed greater than 1 mm/s) after a 50-year storm are<br />

shown in Fig. 4 (with color shades). Thus far, the geological survey team has identified at


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

least 10 landslide scars and slide debris deposits, all within the color shaded areas in Fig. 4.<br />

For example, there are obvious landslide platforms near BH8 and another major one near<br />

the position labeled point ‘A’. A shear surface exists at point ‘A’ with a depth of about 70 m.<br />

When water drains down to this surface, the material strength at the shear surface is<br />

reduced to its residual value. The artesian pressures along the failure surface add to the<br />

instability of the sliding mass.<br />

Fig. 7. Viscosity changes between August 30 2007 and August 30 2008, at borehole location<br />

BH8.<br />

During heavy rainfall periods, water penetration reduces the strength of materials. In<br />

addition, hydrodynamic pressure along the slip surface further reduces stability of the<br />

sliding mass. The model simulations indicate that point ‘C’ is highly unstable under an<br />

extreme precipitation event. Failure will occur around this point first, triggering a failure of<br />

the upper portion. The sliding mass spreads about 50 m downslope and was brought to rest<br />

115


116<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

by the lateral stress from the walls of the V-shaped gully which parallels the 750 m elevation<br />

contour. The sliding material can become up to 20 m thick in the lower elevations. The<br />

accumulated material also can block the gullies and enhance infiltration of rainfall into deep<br />

layers and cause pore water pressure increases, which is a lubricating effect in the model<br />

parameterization. This is especially important for the land segment lying between the 700 m<br />

and 600 m elevation, which is where the primary human residential areas are located. To<br />

obtain additional information for verifying the model credibility for slope stability at Point<br />

‘C’, several more bore-holes are required in slopes adjacent to the gully on the west bank.<br />

In the above scenario, a volume of 6.3×10 7 m 3 of soil and rock is estimated to be creeping. In<br />

retrospect, it appears landslides have been occurring in this region at intervals through<br />

history; but only part of the total creeping mass is involved in any particular landslide.<br />

Specifically, one portion may slide, causing a reduction in the stability of an adjoining<br />

portion; then, years, decades or even centuries later, a subsequent landslide will occur. As a<br />

consequence, the topography of the area is hilly and highly uneven. What determines the<br />

creeping rate of a slope is the material viscosity. We examined the modeled viscosity change<br />

near BH8 (Fig. 7). Because the rocks are heavily weathered, the viscosity is on the order of<br />

10 16 Pa s, which is two orders of magnitude smaller than for the same material in an<br />

undisturbed state. So, when dealing with fractured rocks as a whole, they must be viewed as<br />

granular material. The viscosity of granular material changes as strain accumulates. In this<br />

case, the viscosity is reduced substantially with time at all levels (e.g., it is reduced by >40%<br />

from year 2007 to 2008). This explains why the creeping tends to accelerate with time.<br />

The SEGMENT-landslide system is valuable for monitoring creeping because it can provide<br />

a dynamical representation of changes in the strain distribution inside the sliding material.<br />

Figure 8 shows the modeled creeping velocities for January 2012. A vertical cross-section is<br />

provided along the direction of the primary sliding direction, located near the demarcation<br />

line in Fig. 4, for the current geometry and a climatological mean soil moisture conditions.<br />

Because the sliding material depth is only one-tenth of the slope dimension, for a more<br />

effective display the flow field is transformed into terrain-following sigma coordinates. The<br />

surface corresponds to σ=0 and the bottom of the sliding mass corresponds to σ=1. For<br />

clarity, the portion with flow speeds less than 0.3 m/yr is filtered out. The formation of the<br />

local maximum speed ‘core’ (the band along the σ=0.8 level) near the bottom (Fig. 8b) is<br />

attributed to movement within the fractured layer. Varying the soil moisture conditions<br />

indicates that the movement of this layer is most sensitive to changes in soil moisture<br />

conditions. Any factors preventing surface water entering the ground will help reduce the<br />

acceleration of the sliding mass and delay future landslides. The landslides are sensitive to<br />

soil moisture conditions, but a qualitatively persistent feature is that the maximum strain<br />

area is located upslope, as shown by the warm color shading near ~750 m elevation in Fig.<br />

8a. At present there are crevasses with openings wider than ~5 cm of horizontal<br />

displacement. That the maximum speed cores are relatively isolated indicates that the<br />

sliding surface is not fully connected. In the upcoming 10 years, the causal mechanism for<br />

major slides remains the same, namely, the storm charging of the artesian aquifer and the<br />

lubrication of the granular layer by drainage water.<br />

To investigate the impact of possible future precipitation morphological changes over this<br />

region, 21 st century simulations are analyzed from 17 Climate General Circulation Models<br />

(CGCMS) (see Ren and Karoly 2006) under the SRES A1B (moderate) emission scenario<br />

(Nakicenovic and Swart 2000), which assumes a balanced energy source in a future of rapid<br />

economic growth. Future precipitation rates under the SREA A1B scenario are expected to


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

intensify in the upcoming decades, which is in accord with the consensus of the wider<br />

climate research community (e.g., Groisman et al. 2004, Karl and Trenberth 2003). In<br />

actuality, the total rainfall amount also increases, indicating that the primary mechanism<br />

may be the increase in atmospheric vapor concentration, as described by O’Gorman and<br />

Schneider (2009).<br />

Fig. 8. Creeping speed for January 2012, within a vertical cross-section (along the red arrow<br />

in Fig. 4) under climate mean soil moisture conditions. The top panel is displayed in<br />

physical space (vertical axis is elevation; horizontal axis is distance from the origin). The<br />

bottom panel is displayed in the σ terrain-following coordinate system. So σ = 0 corresponds<br />

to the surface and σ = 1 corresponds to the bottom of the sliding mass. The color shading is<br />

the magnitude of the full 3-D velocity. In panel (b) maximum cores (roughly at the σ = 0.8<br />

level) corresponding to the “creamy” basal sliding layer.<br />

117


118<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

6.2 Discussion<br />

A measure of our understanding of slope sliding processes is our ability to predict the future<br />

behaviour of slopes under a range of conditions. In this study, the SEGMENT-landslide<br />

model (Ren et al., 2009; Ren et al. 2010; Ren et al., 2011a, b) successfully reproduced three<br />

historical storm-triggered landslides that occurred during the past half-century, for the<br />

Yangjiashan creeping slope (YC) in China. SEGMENT also was used to make one further,<br />

long term prediction, for the forthcoming decade, 2010-2019, which quantified the stability<br />

of the YC region and showed that slope movements will occur during the next decade and<br />

that, even more significantly, a major landslide is imminent if an intense rainstorm with<br />

over 150 mm of rainfall occurs at any time in that period, even in the near or immediate<br />

future.<br />

The SEGMENT landslide modeling system has demonstrated, from numerical experiments<br />

carried out over the YC region, that it can anticipate how strain accumulates. For example, it<br />

shows how load increases with precipitation and that there is an accompanying decrease in<br />

yield strength. SEGMENT can predict when sliding, or rapid slope failure, is probable, given<br />

the available meteorological parameters, soil properties and land cover conditions.<br />

For the YC, its particular geological constituents are the main cause of its landslide<br />

susceptibility to triggering by storm events. Heavy storms are enhancement as well as<br />

triggering factors. Our study points out an aspect that requires close monitoring because it<br />

likely is responsible for the upslope cascading of storm-triggered landslides. Model<br />

sensitivity experiments established a stability feature not investigated by the survey team.<br />

The model demonstrated that rainstorm generated instability at a given location forms the<br />

first sliding block in a sequence, by acting as a trigger for a domino-like slide that moves up<br />

the slope.<br />

We find that increased infiltration of groundwater into the sub-surface from storms<br />

increases creeping rates dramatically for weathered slopes. For slopes experiencing repeated<br />

failure-restore cycles, increased precipitation amount and intensity under a future warming<br />

climate are the two most important factors determining long-term increases in landslide<br />

frequency.<br />

Quantitative predictions of storm triggered landslides require a numerical modeling system<br />

like SEGMENT-landslide. However, some of the requirements of SEGMENT-landslide,<br />

especially the input and verification data, generally are not available even in current<br />

geological maps. These parameters include vegetation loading and root distributions in soils<br />

and weathered rocks. The application of the SEGMENT-landslide model to other regions is<br />

limited primarily by a lack of these high resolution input datasets. The landslide features<br />

implemented in SEGMENT-landslide, if adopted by the relevant community, hopefully will<br />

encourage the collection of such vital information in future surveys.<br />

7. Landslides in a future climate<br />

There is a considerable and expanding body of opinion which suggests that earth may suffer<br />

marked temperature increases over the next 50-100 years (Rind 1984) due to heat retention<br />

by the atmosphere caused by increased levels of the greenhouse gases (GHG) such as CO2,<br />

CH4 and oxides of nitrogen. The levels in the atmosphere have increased quite dramatically<br />

in the last 70 years and are expected to continue to rise. One consequence is an intensified<br />

hydrological cycle. Estimates of the effects vary widely but all predict some increase in<br />

storm-triggered landslides.


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

The global hydrological cycle also is assumed to be intensified. However, different regions<br />

may respond very differently (Ren et al. 2011a). For example, both monsoonal regions (e.g.,<br />

the Yanjiashan creeping slope located in the Asian monsoonal region) and Mediterranean<br />

regions (e.g., California) show significant increases in extreme precipitation, but the average<br />

annual precipitation changes are different. Precipitation over the Asian monsoon region<br />

increases significantly, consistent with increasing tropospheric specific humidity, as pointed<br />

out by Allen and Ingram (2002). In fact, the increase in annual mean precipitation over this<br />

region is due mainly to the shift toward heavier precipitation events. The CCSM simulated<br />

precipitation trend over southern California under the SRES A1B scenario, counterintuitively<br />

indicates that total precipitation decreases by more than 0.1 mm/day on an<br />

annual basis. Storms become more intense but farther apart in time, favoring a droughtflood<br />

bipolar temporal pattern as suggested by Trenberth (1999). Importantly, current<br />

climate models show strong inter-model consistency for this finding.<br />

In landslide terms, the phenomenon has been postulated to be a potential eventuality in two<br />

different ways. One proposes that the debris flows will occur more frequently on smaller<br />

scales. The other suggestion, considered more likely by some concerns the less frequent but<br />

more disastrous outburst of storm-triggered landslides. One thing for sure is that many of<br />

regions with minor risks could be magnified if the earth’s climate undergoes significant<br />

changes over the next 50-100 years as a consequence of continued burning of large amount<br />

of fossil fuels.<br />

8. Summary<br />

Natural hazards are an ever-present threat to human lives and infrastructure. The need for<br />

greater predictive capability has been identified as one of 10 Grand Challenges in Earth<br />

Sciences (NRC, 2008). As an effort toward the goal of a reliable landslide mapping and<br />

warning system, we present a modeling system (SEGMENT) that systematically estimates<br />

the potential for landslides over a regional area, rather than for a single slope. The<br />

promising performance of the model is attributable to the use of a new, fully threedimensional<br />

modeling framework based on a newly proposed granular rheology, and to the<br />

use of a land surface scheme that explicitly parameterizes the hydrological characteristics of<br />

macro-pores. Some requirements of the model, such as vegetation loading and root<br />

distribution in soils and weathered rocks, are not available even in present geological maps.<br />

Applications of SEGMENT to other regions are limited primarily by a lack of high resolution<br />

input data sets. However, the new concepts implemented in the model, if adopted by the<br />

community, may encourage the collection of such information in future surveys.<br />

The anticipated future climate warming has influence on the occurrence of landslides<br />

caused by elevated water content in the ground. Changes in precipitation morphology are<br />

highly relevant for storm-triggered landslides and subsequent desertification, because the<br />

root system of vegetation has adapted to the current precipitation climatology and likely is<br />

not prepared for human-induced changes in climate. Under the current relatively stable<br />

astronomical boundary conditions there are natural “rhythms”, whereas human induced<br />

changes are likely to transition significantly in one direction, leading to a climate state not<br />

experienced before by the existing terrestrial ecosystem. Microclimatic variations associated<br />

with slopes allow stands of an ecosystem type to exist far beyond their major zones of<br />

distribution (Chapin et al. 2002). These outliers act as important colonizing individuals<br />

during times of rapid climate change. Destroying these outlier species (transitional belts on<br />

119


120<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Holdridge’s chart) by landslide burial, accompanying extreme precipitation, may slow<br />

down ecosystem migration in accord with climate change.<br />

Landslides are localized events. Advanced dynamical models with physical basis should be<br />

used as there is a need for prediction, rather than simply documenting the occurrence of<br />

landslides. SEGMENT-landslide is an effort in this direction. Because there are<br />

biogeochemical submodels coupled in the SEGMENT system, it also is an ideal tool for<br />

investigating the environmental consequences of landslides, including deforestation and an<br />

associated decrease in productivity.<br />

9. References<br />

Allen, M., and W. Ingram, 2002: Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic<br />

cycle. Nature, 419, 224-232.<br />

Amundson, R. V., and H. Jenny (1997), On a state factor model of ecosystem. BioScience 47,<br />

536-543.<br />

Baum, R. L., W.Z. Savage, and J.W. Godt (2008), TRIGRS-A Fortran program for transient<br />

rainfall infiltration and grid based regional slope-stability analysis, version 2.0: U.S.<br />

Geological Survey Open-File Report, 75pp.<br />

BNPB, 2009. Indonesian Disaster Data and Information. Badan Penanggulangan Bencana<br />

Nasional (National Disaster Management Agency) Retrieved 21th May, 2009.<br />

http://dibi.bnpb.go.id/<br />

Burrough, P.A., and R.A. McDonnell (2004), Principles of geographical information systems,<br />

Spatial Information Systems and Geostatistics, 333pp. Oxford University Press.<br />

Caine, N. (1980), The rainfall intensity¬duration control of shallow landslides and debris<br />

flows. Geografisker Annaler, Series A, 62, 23¬27.<br />

Cannon, S.H., and S. Ellen, 1985: Rainfall conditions for abundant debris avalanches. San<br />

Francisco Bay Region, California. California Geology, 38, 267-272.<br />

Casadei, M., W. Dietrich, and N. Miller (2003), Testing a model for predicting the timing and<br />

location of shallow landslide initiation in soil-mantled landscapes, Earth Surf.<br />

Processes Landf., 28, 925-950.<br />

Chapin III, F., P. Matson, and H. Mooney, 2002: Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology.<br />

Springer Science and Business Media, Inc., NY, 436p.<br />

Costa, J. E. (1984), Physical geography of debris flows, in Costa, J. E., and Fleisher, P. J.<br />

(eds). Developments and Applications in Geomorphology: Springer Verlag, pp.<br />

268-317.<br />

Crosta, G. 1998. Regionalization of rainfall thresholds: an aid to landslide hazard evaluation.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Geology 35 (2-3): 131-145.<br />

Cruden, D. M., and D. J. Varnes (1996), Landslide types and processes; in, Landslides<br />

Investigation and Mitigation, A. K. Turner and R. L. Schuster, eds.: National<br />

Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Special Report 247, p. 36-75.<br />

Cruden, DM. 1991. A Simple Definition of a Landslide. Bulletin International Association of<br />

Engineering Geology 43: 27-29.<br />

Dai, FC, Lee, CF and Ngai, YY. (2002), Landslide risk assessment and management: an<br />

overview. Engineering Geology 64 (1): 65-87.<br />

Dietrich, W. E., and J. T. Perron (2006), The search for a topographic signature of life.<br />

Nature, 439, 411-418.


Landslides Caused Deforestation<br />

Godt, J., R. Baum, and A. Chleborad (2006), Rainfall characteristics for shallow land-sliding<br />

in seattle, Washington, USA, Earth Surf.Processes Landforms, 31, 97-110.<br />

Groisman, P., R. Knight, T. Karl, D. Easterling, B. Sun, and J. Lawrimore (2004),<br />

Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States<br />

trends derived from in situ observations. J. Hydrometeorology, 5, 64-85.<br />

Iverson, R. (1997), The physics of debris flows. Review of Geophysics, 35, 245-296.<br />

Karl, T., and K. Trenberth (2003), Modern Global Climate Change. Science, 302, 1719-1723.<br />

Matson, P.A., C. Volkmann, K. Coppinger, and W.A. Reiners (1991), Annual nitrous oxide<br />

flux and soil nitrogen characteristics in sagebrush steppe ecosystems.<br />

Biogeochemistry, 14, 1-12.<br />

Nakicenovic, N., and R. Swart (eds.) (2000), Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES).<br />

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 612pp.<br />

NRC, 2008: Origin and Evolution of Earth: Research Questions for a Changing Planet.<br />

National Academy Press, 137 pp.<br />

O’Gorman, P., and T. Schneider (2009), The physical basis for increases in precipitation<br />

extremes in simulations of 21st century climate change. PNAS, 106, 14773-14777.<br />

Ren, D., R. Fu, L. M. Leslie, and R. Dickinson (2011a), Predicting storm-triggered landslides.<br />

BAMS. DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS3017.1.<br />

Ren, D., R. Fu, L. M. Leslie, and R. Dickinson (2011b), Modeling the mudslide aftermath of<br />

the 2007 southern California wildfires. J. Natural Hazards. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-<br />

010-9615-5.<br />

Ren, D., R. Fu, L. M. Leslie, R. Dickinson, and X. Xin, 2010: A storm-triggered landslide<br />

monitoring and prediction system: Formulation and case study. Earth Interactions.<br />

Paper 12 of Volume 14.<br />

Ren, D., J. Wang, R. Fu, D. Karoly, H. Yang, L. M. Leslie, C. Fu, and G. Huang (2009),<br />

Mudslide caused ecosystem degradation following Wenchuan earthquake 2008.<br />

GRL,36, doi:10.1029/2008GL036702.<br />

Ren, D., L. M. Leslie, and D. Karoly (2008), Mudslide risk analysis using a new constitutive<br />

relationship for granular flow, Earth Interactions, 12, 1-16.<br />

Ren, D., and D. Karoly (2006), Comparison of glacier-inferred temperatures with<br />

observations and climate model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 33,<br />

L23710.<br />

Rind, D. (1984), The influence of vegetation on the hydrological cycle in a global climate<br />

model. Climatic processes and climate sensitivity. J. E. Hansen and T. Takahashi, Eds.,<br />

Amer. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC, 73-91.<br />

Schofield, A. N., and T. Telford, 2006. Disturbed soil properties and geotechnical design,<br />

ISBN 0-7277-2982-9.<br />

Selby, M.J. (1993), Hillslope Materials and Processes. Oxford university press, Oxford, UK.<br />

Sidle, R. C. (1992), A theoretical model of the effects of timber harvesting on slope stability.<br />

Water Resources Research, 28, 1897-1910.<br />

Sirangelo, B., and P. Versace, 1996: A real time forecasting model for landslides triggered by<br />

rainfall. Meccanica, 31, 73-85.<br />

Smith, K and D. Petley (2008), <strong>Environment</strong>al Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing<br />

Disaster, Fifth Edition. Routledge, London, 414p. ISBN 0-203-88480-9<br />

Trenberth, K., 1999: Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle<br />

with climate change. Clim. Change, 42, 327-339.<br />

121


122<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Van Asch, T., and Van Beek, J. 1999. A View on Some Hydrological Triggering Systems in<br />

Landslides. Geomorphology 30 (Elsevier Science): 25-32.<br />

Wooten RM, K. A. Gillon, A. Witt, R. Latham, T. Douglas, J. Bauer, S. Fuemmeler, and L.<br />

Lee, 2008: Geologic, geomorphic, and meteorological aspects of debris flows<br />

triggered by Hurricanes Frances and Ivan during September 2004 in the southern<br />

Appalachian Mountains of Macon county, North Carolina (southeastern USA).<br />

Landslides, 5,31–44.


1. Introduction<br />

Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical<br />

Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

Serafeim Polyzos and Dionysios Minetos<br />

University of Thessaly, Department of Planning and Regional Development,<br />

Pedion Areos, Volos,<br />

Greece<br />

Amongst others, forest land use changes occur for multiple reasons and from interacting<br />

processes and mechanisms. Human-driven changes, at an array of scales, are affecting forest<br />

ecosystems accelerating changes such as global warming with adverse consequences on<br />

human well being. Research has demonstrated that, in the long term, there is to not a single<br />

factor or set of factors that can explain the emerging patterns of land uses and their<br />

associated changes (Chomitz and Gray 1996; Lambin, Turner et al. 2001; Aspinall 2004). Yet,<br />

the importance of forests on global environmental issues such as biodiversity loss and global<br />

warming is apparent.<br />

Deforestation processes have different characteristics across space and time (Verburg,<br />

Schulp et al. 2006). A particular combination of factors that may explain deforestation<br />

pattern somewhere, might not be applicable for justifying change in any other location or<br />

time period (Mahapatra and Kant 2005). Therefore, there is a need for conducting empirical<br />

investigations in order to analyse and understand the geographical and historical context of<br />

land use changes. In addition, forest fragmentation, conversion and modification have<br />

significant economic, social and environmental implications (Elands and Wiersum 2001;<br />

Walker 2001; Platt 2004; Verburg, Overmars et al. 2006) such as disruption in continuity of<br />

the natural landscape, forest and open-land constriction between agricultural and urban<br />

land uses, deterioration of vital habitats that sustain valuable biodiversity as well as broader<br />

issues such as air pollution.<br />

In this paper, we concentrate on reviewing and evaluating deforestation-related theoretical<br />

schemata. We introduce a representative collection of theories dealing, directly or indirectly<br />

with deforestation processes in order to provide guidance to an appreciation of the past and<br />

the future land use patterns. In addition, we give evidence of recent deforestation dynamics<br />

in Greece.<br />

2. Framework of review and evaluation<br />

Theories are presented in a timeline context. There is also a set of criteria used for the<br />

evaluation. The criteria are presented in table 1.<br />

7


124<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

EVALUATION AXES SPECIAL CRITERIA OF EVALUATION<br />

A.1 Human decision level<br />

A. SCALE<br />

A.2 Spatial Level<br />

A.3 Temporal Level (time step)<br />

B.1 Raking of the phenomenon<br />

B. FOCUS OF <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>ORY<br />

B.2 Descriptive<br />

B.3 Causal<br />

B.4 Predictive<br />

C.1 Economic Mechanisms<br />

C.<br />

MAIN MECHANISM OF<br />

LAND USE CHANGE<br />

C.2 Social Mechanisms<br />

C.3 Administrative-Political Mechanisms<br />

C.4 Natural Resources<br />

D. INTERDISCIPLINARY<br />

D.1 Transectoral focus<br />

D.2 Sectoral focus<br />

E.1 Descriptive<br />

E. NATURE OF <strong>THE</strong>ORY<br />

E.2 Geometrical<br />

E.3 Mathematical<br />

F. LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT<br />

F.1 Developed countries<br />

F.2 Developing countries<br />

Table 1. Framework for evaluating of deforestation-related theoretical schemata.<br />

a. The scale in which the theory can be applied for describing and interpreting land use<br />

changes.<br />

The significance of scale is critical and concerns:<br />

The human decision-making process (single person, household etc).<br />

The geographical unit of analysis (spatial analysis) in which the theory can be effectively<br />

applied (city, region, country).<br />

The time unit of analysis, (temporal analysis) which is connected with the ability of the<br />

theory approaching short-term, medium-term or long-term changes.<br />

b. The central aim of the theory.<br />

Theories, mainly attempt to classify, describe, explain or even forecast spatial tranformation<br />

phenomena. Classification is a way of categorizing observed land use changes, so that any<br />

likely differences or similarities in the way that spatial phenomena transform space, are<br />

better understood. Descriptive theoretical approaches, in addition to classifying observed<br />

complex geographical formations, also attempt to determine concrete functional<br />

relationships and processes that, in turn, reveal likely associations between different uses of<br />

land. Explanatory theoretical perspectives concentrate on the determination of factors and<br />

dynamics that produce, wear out or eliminate certain land uses. Finally, predictive<br />

theoretical perspectives focus on the projection of spatial phenomena into the future aiming<br />

at forecasting any future composition of land use system.<br />

c. Main mechanism of land use change.<br />

The comprehension of underlying causes associated with land use change processes as well<br />

as The understanding of the major mechanisms of land use allocation is a critical matter. The<br />

existing theoretical pool in the field of land use change includes diverse approaches that<br />

either focus on economic processes and factors or on social and administrative processes, or<br />

support that the spatial distribution of different land uses is determined by the existing


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

distribution of natural resources. Therefore, it is extremely significant to understand the<br />

particular mechanism or set of mechanisms that each theoretical perspective puts forward in<br />

order to approach successfully complex spatial phenomena.<br />

d. Sectoral or multi-sectoral approach.<br />

The choice of how to approach a particular land use change process is of critical importance.<br />

Some theoretical perspectives follow a sectoral approach whereas some others employ an<br />

inter-sectoral logic. In the first case the theory focuses in only one category or subcategories<br />

of land use (rural use, urban use, forest use, or residence, industry, tourism, etc.). In the<br />

second case, the focus is shifted towards interpretation of intersectoral phenomena<br />

connected with observed land use transformations (e.g. urban sprawl etc).<br />

e. Nature of theory.<br />

The way that each theory has been stated or presented, relates to the level of formalism and<br />

scientific severity. Generally speaking, most theories adopt a verbal, geometrical, or<br />

mathematic approach or a combination of them, as a basic platform in putting forward their<br />

key statements.<br />

f. Level of development<br />

Remarkable differences in the levels of economic growth between countries have caused the<br />

emergence of at least two general categories of theories. There are theories suitable for<br />

satisfactorily interpreting spatial phenomena in developed societies, and also theories that<br />

mainly apply best in the case of less developed countries.<br />

Below, an attempt is made to critically review some of the most important theoretical<br />

approaches that directly or indirectly refer to processes in forest land use change.<br />

3. Review of theoretical approaches<br />

This section provides a brief review and evaluation of theoretical approaches on the<br />

phenomenon of forest land use change. The purpose of the review is to locate the major<br />

proximate and underlying causes of deforestation proposed by the literature. Recent<br />

attempts to theorise forest land use changes have yielded some noticeable contributions on<br />

the field of deforestation.<br />

One such contribution referred to as “forest transition theory” has been put forward by Mather,<br />

Grainger and Needle since the early ’90 (Grainger 1995; Reid, Tomich et al. 2006). According to<br />

this theoretical perspective, an overview of forest land use changes in the long run, provides<br />

firm evidence that while initially forest land areas retreat at a high speed, at same point,<br />

depletion starts slowing down. There is even a critical point over which the process of<br />

depletion reverses and forest land recovers by expanding into new areas. Prosperity level seems<br />

to have a key role in the whole process. The main land use change mechanism suggested by<br />

this theory is of economic nature and also has some common places with Kuznets’<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Curve (Koop and Tole 1999; Ehrhardt-Martinez, Crenshaw et al. 2002) that<br />

links national or regional environmental quality with the state of economic development. The<br />

spatial level of analysis that the theory best applies is to nationwide or higher.<br />

Based on the aforementioned perspective, Mather (2006) and Grainger (1995) state that most<br />

of the developed countries have been in a state of forest transition as forest land has been<br />

expanding for several decades. Explanations concerning forest transition processes are<br />

sought both in development theory and modernization theory. These theoretical perspectives<br />

focus on the importance of economic and social changes that spring from the adjustment of<br />

125


126<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

the economic, social and political structure to technological advances. In this respect, during<br />

the course of development increased pressure is put on forest land due to higher demand<br />

for land and forest related products. As a spatial unit moves to higher stages of<br />

development, pressure on forest land retreats because technological innovations allow for<br />

increased productivity in the primary sector, limiting the needs for expansion on forest land.<br />

At the same time, the increased rates of urbanization drive large waves of population away<br />

from the countryside into cities and towns lowering the pressure on forests by human<br />

activity in exurban remote areas.<br />

A sizable body of empirical research on forest transition theory has generated considerable<br />

evidence in favour of some of the theory’s reasoning (Koop and Tole 1999; Ehrhardt-<br />

Martinez, Crenshaw et al. 2002; Geist, McConnell et al. 2006; Reid, Tomich et al. 2006).<br />

Empirical evidence systematically suggests a negative relationship between the rate of<br />

deforestation and the rate of urbanization or the level of new technology adoption in the<br />

primary sector (Perz 2007).<br />

In a recent attempt of improving the context of the theory, Angelsen (2001) suggests that the<br />

stages of forest transition theory (low deforestation, intense deforestation, containment of<br />

deforestation, afforestation) can be better understood by focusing on the fundamental<br />

characteristics of the long-term relationship between agricultural land rent and forest land rent.<br />

Mathematically, this means that forest land use changes [DU]fr are a function of agricultural<br />

land rent [LR]agr and forest land rent [LR]frs of the type<br />

LR <br />

.<br />

<br />

<br />

agr<br />

DU fst f<br />

LR frs<br />

In this case, the most important part of the analysis is to identify the way and magnitude of<br />

the influence of applied policies on agricultural and forest land rent. However, Angelsen<br />

points out that diagnosis and measurement of the actual influence of policies on land rent is,<br />

at least difficult to achieve, since on top of the obvious and direct impacts, economic<br />

phenomena are usually involved in numerous feedbacks and interactions that produce new<br />

waves of influences on land rent. For instance, the adoption of a new technology in<br />

agriculture may initially make agricultural activities more profitable fueling the expansion<br />

of agricultural land on forest land. In the long run, however, balancing effect will emerge<br />

due to changes both in agricultural goods prices and wages in agriculture leading to the<br />

containment of the expansion or even a reverse process of forest advancement.<br />

The aforementioned analysis by Angelsen focuses on tropical regions, where one of the most<br />

important proximate causes of deforestation is believed to be agricultural activity. However,<br />

in cases where urban land uses control the process of deforestation, the relationship between<br />

forest and urban land uses in terms of land rent might constantly fuel urban expansion. An<br />

additional consideration regarding the Agelesen’s land rent approach rests on the property<br />

regime of forest resources. In several parts of the world, the great share of forest land<br />

belongs to the state and not to private owners. In those cases, where the state cannot assure<br />

its one rights on land there is more scope for forest land encroachment and exploitation<br />

through logging and cultivation. In these cases, forest land use change processes maybe<br />

better understood on the basis of Hardin’s theory of the tragedy of the common (1968).<br />

Individuals when act independently might have no motives for considering the need for a<br />

sustainable use of shared natural resources (Herschel 1997). The negative external


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

economies by the depletion of forest resources are spread to society whereas the economic<br />

profits from wood exploitation and agricultural production in formerly wooded land are<br />

capitalized on by the intruders.<br />

Approaches for unsustainable forest resource exploitation are not scarce. Several researchers<br />

(Roberts and Greimes 2002; Shandra, London et al. 2003), drawing from the “theory of<br />

dependence” by Baran, Frank and Amin as well as from “world systems theory” by Wallerstein,<br />

claim that the developed regions have establish a particular system of economic exchange<br />

that imposes certain land use patterns to the less developed regions. This particular<br />

economic exchange process between the developed and the less developed peripheries takes<br />

place on unequal terms resulting in the unsustainable use of natural resources in the less<br />

developed areas. Power, wealth and prosperity are, therefore, related to the depletion of<br />

forest resources in the developing regions and to the sustainable use and possible expansion<br />

in prosperous regions.<br />

Both the importance and the adaptive nature of strategies employed by agents in order to<br />

maintain their prosperity level were firmly established in the context of “multi-phasic<br />

response theory” proposed by Davis in 1963. It is now believed that applied more broadly,<br />

multi-phasic response theory can help to understand how agents decisions impact land use<br />

changes (Lambin, Geist et al. 2006).<br />

A similar body of approaches attempts to apply concepts from “game theory” in order to<br />

capture agents’ behaviour in forest land use change process. (Fredj, Martνn-Herrαn et al.<br />

2004). According to some of these perspectives, the major decisive force of the way forest<br />

resources are utilized is state policies. State policies are far from static paying particular<br />

importance to economic growth during periods of economic difficulties where<br />

environmental concerns are ranked low in social agenda. Therefore, regardless of the level<br />

of economic development, the changing conditions of economy over a period of time could<br />

result in the adoption of a sustainable or a less sustainable behaviour towards forest<br />

resource. However, in some cases the unsustainable behaviour adopted by agents may not<br />

lay on the difficulties brought about by unfavourable economic conditions. It might be, in<br />

fact, an act of land speculation based on either high tolerance shown by the political system<br />

or insufficient administrative and environmental monitoring mechanisms. Yet, in the<br />

context of game theory it is proposed that it is possible to arrive to sufficient and sustainable<br />

solutions to the issue of deforestation through cooperation and coordination of the involved<br />

parties and individuals (Fredj, Martνn-Herrαn et al. 2004; Stern 2006).<br />

On the other hand, there is a quite different view concerning the current social behaviour<br />

and state intervention towards forest resources. It is widely believed that current<br />

afforestation policies are not merely an opportunistic reaction to the undisputed acute<br />

depletion of forest resources and its associated impacts. Instead, they also revile a much<br />

deeper transformation of social attitudes and ethics towards the environment. Mather et. al<br />

(2006) argue that at least in the case of developed countries, a great part of society is driven<br />

by the principles of post-productivism philosophy. Profit maximisation is not the only as well<br />

as the central axis of individual behaviour formation. Economic growth is possible to coexist<br />

with protection and restoration of the environment. Several aspects of this new philosophy<br />

of post-productivism can especially be traced in the countryside (Shucksmith 1993) in the<br />

form of certain environmentally sensitive policies that are voluntarily embraced by farmers.<br />

Amongst other, afforestation policies, organic farming measures and codes of good<br />

agricultural practice aim to establish alternative agricultural land management as well as<br />

127


128<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

sustainable ways of agricultural production. Current agricultural land uses are increasingly<br />

characterized by the aforementioned post-productivist features (Reid, Tomich et al. 2006) as<br />

the demand for environmental services has risen sharply in developed regions during the<br />

last decades. Therefore, land use changes in the countryside could possibly be better<br />

understood in the light of society’s priorities in the context set by post-productivism.<br />

In this respect, Maslow’s theory of the hierarchy of needs maintains considerable potential in<br />

explaining certain emerging land use conversions as well as land use qualitative<br />

modifications in exurban land use systems. The importance of the new post-consumption<br />

social motives and ethics stresses Inglehart (1990) pointing out that current economic,<br />

technological, and sociopolitical changes have resulted in an apparent transformation of the<br />

fundamental cultural characteristics of developed societies. This transformation is ceaseless<br />

and has a greater impact on new generations. As new generations replace the older ones in<br />

the system of political, social and economic organization, the characteristics of adopted<br />

economic development strategies change, as well incorporating more environmental<br />

considerations. The implied redirection in priorities, behaviours and ethics is mostly<br />

reflected on agricultural policies and thus on rural land uses. Nowadays farmers receive<br />

more subsidies and other benefits in order to sustain and improve the quality of soil than to<br />

increase agricultural goods production.<br />

Recently, the concept of post-productivism has been enriched with a spatial dimension<br />

grounded on the observation that some regions have developed stronger post-ponductivism<br />

structures than others (Agarwal, Green et al. 2002; Reid, Tomich et al. 2006). Postponductivism<br />

is thought of as a spatial phenomenon too, that is strongly connected to the<br />

rural patterns of land uses. Amongst others, Marsden (1998), Groot et. al. (2007) and van der<br />

Ploeg et. al. (2000) underline the fact that there exist considerable spatial differences within<br />

developed countries at the regional level in relation to the intensity one can observe<br />

evidence of post-productivism. Nevertheless, Mather argues that in spite of the observed<br />

spatial differences in the strength of post-productivism characteristics amongst developed<br />

countries and regions, the phenomenon is present and lies on deep social and cultural<br />

transformations in progress in the developed countries. Such transformations are capable of<br />

inducing constructive institutional interference which is both a cause and a consequence of<br />

new policy planning and application.<br />

The emergence of post-productivism concept as a mean of interpreting the observed rural land<br />

use changes has received considerable criticism. Among others, Evans believes (2002) that<br />

productivism and post-productivism carry a dualistic meaning just like fordism and postfordism,<br />

and therefore, cannot contribute to an in-depth understanding of complex spatial<br />

phenomena. Alternatively, more solid theoretical approaches should be considered such as the<br />

regulation theory. According to this perspective, new economic patterns and social structures<br />

are the result of capitalist economic crises as well as efforts to overcome these crises.<br />

Accordingly, the observed spatial inequalities and the associated land uses and characteristics<br />

of agricultural sector are analogous to the established production relationships, to spatial<br />

division of labour and to changing power allocation in the field of governance.<br />

Recently, ecological modernisation theory has been proposed as an alternative to post-productivism<br />

argument in terms of rural land use change theorisation. According to the advocates of this<br />

view (Andersen and Massa 2000; Buttel 2000; Marsden 2004), it is possible and therefore it<br />

should be pursued, economic growth and social prosperity to be in line with environmental<br />

protection. Technological advances are at the core of this perspective as they are thought of


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

being able of substantially contributing to the effective utilization of natural resource and to<br />

the decrease in the volume of both utilized raw material and produced waste.<br />

Another recent view on managing deforestation proposes the concept of “compensated<br />

reduction” (Santilli, Moutinho et al. 2005). According to this view, countries that are chosen<br />

to lower their national level of deforestation should receive post facto compensation if they<br />

commit to stabilize or even reduce deforestation in the future. In other words, designing and<br />

offering large scale incentives might be a strategy capable of managing high deforestation<br />

rates as it occurs in tropical forest regions. This proposal works similarly to the Certified<br />

Emissions Reductions (CERs) or the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). It also relates<br />

to the notion of valuation of the “unpriced” services of forests in order to reduce<br />

deforestation through economic mechanisms.<br />

In several instances, there exist perspectives linking deforestation directly to the expansion<br />

of agricultural activities. Deforestation due to agriculture expansion is threatening several<br />

critical aspects of the environment such as biodiversity. Regarding the driving factors, it is<br />

thought that technological development and international prices are the basic drivers of crop<br />

expansion. Nevertheless, local actors can develop ways to apply sustainable changes in the<br />

economic activities and reduce negative impacts managing deforestation rates through<br />

conservation policies. It seems, that the powerful position of some actors in the predominant<br />

production and distribution chains of agricultural goods is influenced immensely where<br />

generated prosperity accumulates (van der Ploeg 2000; Allen, FitzSimmons et al. 2003). In<br />

several instances, the greatest share of added value deriving from the ongoing restructuring of<br />

agricultural sector is not yielded by local producers and as a result the future course of<br />

sustainable agricultural systems appears uncertain (Smith and Marsden 2004). It is suggested<br />

that a reasonable response to the aforementioned issue could be the placing of restrictions on<br />

the size of food distribution enterprises as well as localising their characteristics (Raynolds<br />

2000; Allen, FitzSimmons et al. 2003; Seyfang 2006; Feagan 2007). However, such arguments<br />

are directly opposite to the prevailing process of globalization in food production and<br />

distribution. It might be more realistic as well as effective to accent and emphasize the<br />

fundamental qualitative differences between globalization and localization approaches.<br />

Globalization of food production and distribution systems abstracts and alienates economic<br />

transactions from their social and environmental context (Raynolds 2000; Seyfang 2006).<br />

Heterogeneity of rural social and natural forms and processes is neglected. In globalisation<br />

era, it is almost impossible for a consumer of a particular agricultural commodity to identify<br />

the particular social relations and environmental circumstances under which the commodity<br />

was produced (Allen, FitzSimmons et al. 2003). Contrarily, the suggestions of green economy<br />

favour the identification and designation of the social and environmental framework of<br />

production allowing the emergence of economies of place (Seyfang 2006).<br />

The success of economies of place, however, presupposes reconnecting effectually<br />

consumers and producers and establishing trustfulness and reliance amongst all involved<br />

actors (Seyfang 2006). Hence, it might be worth focusing on raising social capital in agriculture<br />

as well as building sufficient stocks of trust, communication and cooperation (Rahman and<br />

Yamao 2007). Even though, some critical views (Hinrichs 2003; Winter 2003; Winter 2005)<br />

point out that economies of place form a defensive strategy towards the ongoing<br />

globalization-driven transformations in agricultural production and distribution.<br />

This strategy is even likely to result in certain spatial disparities in the near future. At the<br />

regional and national scale the shift of society towards quality local products may apply<br />

129


130<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

high pressure on the developing regions and nations which primarily rely on exports of<br />

agricultural products. Sustainable consumption, therefore, has a worth investigating spatial<br />

dimension needing more thorough consideration. In this respect, the notion of global<br />

ecological citizenship suggests that duties and obligations should be perceived in a wider scale<br />

and that consumption of agricultural goods should be guided by global sustainable thinking<br />

(Dobson 2003; Smith 2005).<br />

The theoretical schema of desakota by McGee (2007; 2008), is a relatively recent perspective<br />

trying to put urban expansion and land use change in the broader context of globalization.<br />

The perspective attempts to integrate new economic developments, technological change<br />

and other higher level forces with lower level factors such as distance, availability of<br />

infrastructure and new business opportunities. Although the model has mostly been tested<br />

in Asian regions, it is believed to hold significant potential for western Europe as well (Xie,<br />

Batty et al. 2007).<br />

Finally, the theoretical schemata concerning the structure and evolution of urban space<br />

include several perspectives based on urban geography and political economy. Among<br />

others the theoretical steam of expanding city addresses the importance of current<br />

technological progress in the field of information technologies, the massive increase in the<br />

volume, flow speed and spatial extent of goods and services exchanged as well as the new<br />

social values and ways of living (Munoz 2003; Zhang and Sasaki 2005). According to Ingram<br />

(1998), the contemporary city is characterized by a strong tendency of sprawl for both<br />

people and employment (Thurston and Yezer 1994).<br />

Despite their diverse origins and spatiotemporal scales of employment, the theoretical<br />

perspectives presented share some common features. It seems that both distance and<br />

accessibility have a significant influence on deforestation and land use patterns. Moreover,<br />

technological changes in transportation play a key role in urban evolution. The new social<br />

ethics, behaviours, preferences and ways of living also influence considerably the structure of<br />

space. Population and demographics which are traditional forces of change need also be taken<br />

into account in the context of regional and urban development.<br />

Summing up the discussion of the above perspectives, it can be argued that the common<br />

ground between the aforementioned theoretical schemata lies on the ascertainment that<br />

exurban land use conversions and modifications are advancing at a high rate (McCarthy 2005;<br />

McCarthy 2008). To some theorists, those changes are circumstantial or adventitious reactions<br />

of invested capital on rural areas in order to protect and insure its reproduction (Evans, Morris<br />

et al. 2002). Therefore, the current trajectories of rural land use changes could rapidly shift to<br />

new directions due to changes in the global economic environment. On the other hand, a<br />

growing number of arguments suggest that emerging land use patterns rely on deeper and<br />

stable changes in fundamental characteristics of society in terms of the people’s attitude<br />

towards natural environment (Inglehart 1990; Buttel 2000). However, it is still evident that the<br />

rural land use systems is still a matter of concern and an issue for study and evaluation. In the<br />

following sections, we attempt to produce empirical evidences on some of the theoretical<br />

arguments described above concerning the case of recent forest land use changes in Greece.<br />

4. Synthesis<br />

Following the literature review on deforestation, It is evident that a variety of economic and<br />

social forces might work competitively or additively towards the configuration of land use<br />

patterns across the regions or the prefectures of a country (Verburg, Soepboer et al. 2002;


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

Verburg 2006). Following, we make an attempt to connect all the important aspects of<br />

deforestation in a coherent conceptual framework. Based on the conceptual framework, an<br />

empirical forest land use change model is proposed and the possible effects of all<br />

explanatory variables are discussed hypothesizing that the effect of a particular variable<br />

may differ between geographical areas.<br />

The underlying causes of forest land use change vary from locality to locality as well as<br />

amongst countries (Wood and Skole 1998; Lambin, Turner et al. 2001; GLP 2005). These<br />

economic, socio-cultural and political forces are capable of impacting negatively or<br />

positively the extent and distribution of forest land. Their influence on forests usually<br />

results in quantitative changes as well as qualitative changes. Both conversions and<br />

structural habitat modifications are of great importance to policy makers. Reality is even<br />

more complex because of the usual linkages and interactions between positive and negative<br />

factors of change (Mahapatra and Kant 2005). The likely aggregated outcome of the<br />

combination of negative and positive factors is difficult to understand and predict.<br />

However, it may be more feasible to identify some dynamic processes through which<br />

socioeconomic and political factors operate resulting in distinct patterns of land uses. In this<br />

respect we propose urban sprawl, location decisions of economic activities, agricultural<br />

expansion and agricultural abandonment as the main factors of forest land use change.<br />

In most cases, quantification of these forces is a difficult task, as is also difficult finding the<br />

appropriate methodology capable of giving reliable estimations of the magnitude and<br />

importance of the relationships involved. A wide variety of approaches and techniques have<br />

emerged for this reason, with the intention to rationalise decision-making about land use<br />

change issues (Upadhyay, Solberg et al. 2006). How and to what extent existing<br />

methodologies have satisfactorily reached this target is also a matter of research. Among<br />

applied methodologies, statistical techniques concerned with land use change dynamics are<br />

the most widely used. These models primarily focus on the causes of deforestation rather<br />

than its sources. Observed land use patterns are tightly connected to urban and regional<br />

development policies and to the enlargement of the regional economy. Their ceaseless<br />

transformation is fuelled by the need for serving the rapidly changing economic and social<br />

requirements as well as for fulfilling newly arising demands as a result of economic<br />

liberalization, privatization and transformation of lifestyle.<br />

The morphology and evolution of land use patterns have been extensively studied and<br />

theorised by scientists of different disciplines (Wood and Skole 1998; Irwin and Geoghegan<br />

2001; Walker 2001; Verburg, Schot et al. 2004; Walker 2004). Thus, a plethora of theoretical<br />

and modelling approaches have been developed so far in order to provide possible<br />

explanations of land allocation processes. Two general categories of land cover /use<br />

changes are described in the literature: conversions and modifications (Baulies and Szejwach<br />

1998; Briassoulis 2000; Lesschen, Verburg et al. 2005). Land cover conversion refers to a<br />

change from one cover type to another whereas land cover modification implies structural<br />

or functional transitions in cover without loss in initial determinative characteristics.<br />

Similarly, land use conversion refers to a complete change from one use type to another<br />

whereas land use modification implies structural or functional alterations in use without<br />

loss of initial attributive characteristics. Finally, the driving forces (causes) of LUC change<br />

can be divided into two categories: Proximate causes and underlying causes. Proximate<br />

causes of land use change are associated with coarse anthropogenic operations that directly<br />

influence spatial patterns as, for instance, urbanisation, agricultural expansion and forest<br />

131


132<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

exploitation (Geist and Lambin 2001; Lesschen, Verburg et al. 2005). Underlying causes of<br />

land use change are associated with generative agents that weave proximate causes, such as<br />

economic, socio-demographic and technological factors (Geist and Lambin 2001; Lesschen,<br />

Verburg et al. 2005).<br />

Proximate Land use change forces at the Macroscopic level<br />

causes<br />

Functioning and expansion of Transportation and other kinds of<br />

urban land forms and activities infrastructure<br />

Functioning and expansion or Livestock breading systems and<br />

shrinkage of agricultural<br />

activities<br />

forest resources exploitation<br />

Underlying Economic Factors<br />

causes<br />

Sector arrangement of the<br />

regional economy<br />

Sectoral Employment<br />

Sectoral structure Investments and business location<br />

decisions<br />

Size and synthesis of imports and<br />

exports<br />

Consumption patterns<br />

Productivity Diffusion of technology and<br />

adoption of innovations<br />

Competitiveness of the economy Mean size of businesses<br />

Technological level of the<br />

Scale and agglomeration<br />

economy<br />

economies<br />

Taxation Investment incentives and<br />

development policies<br />

Income distribution<br />

Social factors<br />

Added value<br />

Population skills level Housing policy<br />

Education level Institutions<br />

Social infrastructure Population quality in the public<br />

sector<br />

Social security<br />

Demographic factors<br />

Life style<br />

Population changes Indirect population potential<br />

Urban and rural population Direct population potential<br />

Age of the population<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al factors<br />

Population mobility<br />

Soil fertility Biodiversity<br />

Topography Ecosystem productivity<br />

Climatic conditions Water resources<br />

Stretch of the coastline Insular or mainland area<br />

Table 2. Proximate and underlying causes of deforestation<br />

Another useful distinction regarding land use change driving forces. could also be taken<br />

into account. They can be categorised into “endogenously changed or shifting or<br />

metamorphotic forces” that usually change very quickly over time (e.g. employment


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

patterns of the new economy, location and relocation decisions of certain types of firms,<br />

supply and demand of certain products and services) “slow-shifting forces” (e.g. population<br />

size and other demographical characteristics) and “conditioning forces” which usually<br />

exhibit a temporal stability (e.g. soil types, geomorphology). The last categorisation of<br />

driving forces, in a way, implies that a steady state of land use patterns should almost never<br />

be expected. This endogenous, ever-changing nature of certain forces has been pointed out<br />

by theoretical approaches such as game theory and has also certain modelling implication in<br />

land use change studies. As Arthur (2005) states, out-of-equilibrium situations or the<br />

emergence of equilibria and the general unfolding of patterns in the economy calls for an<br />

algorithmic approach. Land use patterns may represent temporarily fulfilled or unfulfilled<br />

complex expectations not necessarily rationally formed as in the case of El Farol Bar<br />

problem (Arthur 1994). Table 2 provides a summary of some deforestation driving forces<br />

under the aforementioned categorisation framework.<br />

Regarding economic factors, their main effect on land use changes depends mostly on the<br />

changes of the sectoral structure of economy. For instance, there might be labour transfer<br />

from an economic sector to another as in case of agricultural expansion or large-scale<br />

tourism development that may follow a decrease in industrial employment. The<br />

aforementioned structural changes are likely to influence decisively the land use system and<br />

also result in changes in the allocation of labour and land.<br />

Population movements between regions are also important influential factors of land system.<br />

Such movements may have a direction from rural areas to large urban concentrations or there<br />

may be a reverse process of rural rebound where people move away from cities towards rural<br />

regions. In the first case, there might be intensification of the use of land in peri-urban space. In<br />

the second case, land use change happen in the countryside.<br />

Finally, energy policy and taxation in resources such as natural gas and petrol are possible<br />

to result in an increase in the use of fuelwood and thus in deforestation or they may result in<br />

the development of alternative energy sources such as wind energy, solar energy etc. The<br />

likely results on land use system and on forests are complex and difficult to predict. They<br />

depend on the applied economic policy and also on the level of environmental awareness of<br />

people and authorities.<br />

The impacts of the ongoing economic crisis on forests and on land use system in general, are<br />

difficult to forecast as there is no information on the likely duration of economic crisis, and<br />

on the particular counties, regions and economic sectors that will be affected most.<br />

5. Evidence from Greece<br />

Land use changes involve several positive and negative impacts on economic, social and<br />

environmental aspects. These impacts could have limited territorial scope or wider<br />

territorial implications, causing changes in the use of land in a greater geographical scale.<br />

(Chhabra, Geist et al. 2006). Impacts can also, have short-term, medium-term or even longterm<br />

action, be additive, synergistic, reversible or irreversible. Overall implications depend<br />

on recipients’ degree of sensitivity, the ability to absorb or cope with pressure, as well as the<br />

type, intensity, extent and duration of pressure. Consequently, recognition, estimation and<br />

evaluation of likely economic, social and environmental impacts connected to forest land<br />

use changes, is a difficult process (Chhabra, Geist et al. 2006). Fig. 1, presents the<br />

geographical distribution and magnitude of some key phenomena associated with forest<br />

133


134<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

land use changes in Greece. Based on the information of the Fig. 1, it is possible put forward<br />

some comments concerning land use change in Greece:<br />

High deforestation constitutes a significant process of land use change in several insular<br />

as well as mountainous regions of the country (Minetos and Polyzos 2010). A limited<br />

number of mainland coastal regions as well as some regions adjacent to large<br />

metropolitan areas, present high deforestation rates. Examining the information on the<br />

maps, it is obvious that deforestation, very often, coexists with the urban sprawl and<br />

illegal housing activity. Beyond the obvious impacts on the biodiversity of these<br />

regions, there also emerge several questions concerning erosion processes, flooding and<br />

loss of ground via rain water washings. Taking into account that edaphogenic processes<br />

follow the geological time scale, such changes should be considered as being<br />

irreversible. At the same time, the cost of protecting human activities from flooding<br />

events increases, the available fresh water resources lower and microclimate and living<br />

conditions at the local level change. In the long term, reduction of biodiversity is<br />

expected to affect negatively development opportunities and to also influence the<br />

regional level of prosperity (Minetos and Polyzos 2010). Finally, it is worth mentioning<br />

that deforestation processes at numerous localities accumulate affecting wider areas at<br />

the regional scale and also fuelling global environmental issues such as global warming<br />

and climate change.<br />

Increased conversion and modification of agricultural land present high rates in the<br />

case of regions with large urban concentrations, in regions adjacent to the<br />

aforementioned ones as well as in several insular regions (Minetos and Polyzos 2009).<br />

Processes that contribute to the configuration of this pattern are: (a) Urbanisation of<br />

agricultural land and, (b) abandonment of marginal agricultural land. Therefore, in a<br />

great number of the aforementioned regions, the loss of agricultural land is connected<br />

to pressures deriving from urban sprawl and illegal housing activity (Minetos and<br />

Polyzos 2009). In the rest of the regions, loss of agricultural land is connected to the low<br />

competitiveness of agricultural sector and the problematic environmental and<br />

demographic characteristics within which agricultural activity takes place.<br />

It is apparent that economic forces such as land-rent, lead to structural changes to the<br />

economic base of regional areas in question (Polyzos 2009). However, if we take into<br />

consideration the way in which this economic transformation (illegal housing, urban<br />

sprawl) is happening, then it is likely that several negative economic, social and<br />

environmental impacts will emerge having long lasting action. More specifically, the<br />

shrinkage of the economic base of the regional spatial units and, in certain cases, the<br />

observed orientation of local economic base to a single activity generates phenomena of<br />

"monoculture" (e.g. tourism) in the economy.<br />

Urban sprawl, concerns most regions of the country but it presents particular intensity in the<br />

western and southern areas as well as in most of the islands. High sprawl of urban activities<br />

in ex-urban location is observed in also relatively remote areas (Polyzos and Minetos 2009).<br />

They are also frequent commercial linear developments following the major interregional<br />

transportation routes as well as extensive low density areas of urban forms (residential<br />

units, tourism infrastructure, etc). A development pattern like this needs to be supported by<br />

a large amount of infrastructure (road axes, networks of water supply, networks and<br />

installations of waste water treatment) the size of which might be disproportionate to the<br />

size of served population.


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

Fig. 1. Matrix of regional spatial units in Greece and the magnitude of significant land use<br />

change phenomena (NSSG 1994; NSSG 1995; NSSG 1999; NSSG 2004; NSSG 2004; NSSG 2006).<br />

135


136<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Illegal housing seems to be high in almost all neighbouring regions to large urban<br />

concentrations, and also in several costal locations and remote areas (Polyzos and Minetos<br />

2009). While in the past, illegal housing activity as a phenomenon was concentrated in urban<br />

and suburban space, resulting in significant negative consequences to the formation and<br />

functionality of cities, nowadays it appears that illegal housing phenomenon influences<br />

wider spatial units.<br />

a b<br />

c d<br />

Fig. 2. Hot-spots of land use changes: a) Very significant land use changes b) significant land<br />

use changes c) moderate land use changes d) low land use changes<br />

The phenomenon of land use change happens for multiple reasons and also presents<br />

important spatial differentiations. In order to acquire an overall understanding of land use<br />

transformations and modifications, we attempt to locate "hot-spots" (Reid, Tomich et al.<br />

2006) or "regions of very high activity" across the country (Figures 1 and 2). In the first<br />

column of matrix in Fig. 1 we have coloured with red regions that present very high (VH)<br />

rates in at least two of the four spatial phenomena that mainly drive land use changes. They<br />

also present high (H) activity in at least one of the four aforementioned phenomena. These<br />

regions constitute the "hot spots” or "first level areas” of land use change. The spatial<br />

"distribution of "hot spots" is presented in the Fig. 2a. In these areas, land use changes are<br />

rapid and extensive and they perhaps jeopardize the fundamental regional characteristics as<br />

well as economic, social and environmental equilibrium of these areas.


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

We have also created a second category of hot spots (regions with orange shading in matrix of<br />

Fig. 1). These areas include regions with high or very high intensity in three out the four<br />

phenomena or regions with very high intensity in two out of four phenomena, excluded the<br />

prefectures of first category. These regions constitute constitute "second level hot spots. Their<br />

spatial distribution is presented in the Fig. 2b. They are regions in which land use changes are<br />

significant in magnitude and their future course may become particularly problematic.<br />

A third category of regions consist of areas with high or very high rate in two out of four<br />

phenomena. In these areas, land use changes are of a moderate magnitude either because<br />

these regions are in a kind of recession compared to their past size of activity (eg Attica,<br />

Thessalonica, Dodekanisa etc), or it is expected that they are going to accelerated in the near<br />

future (Trikalas, Ioanninas etc). In most of the rest regions land use change phenomena<br />

present low intensity.<br />

Summarising the above discussion, it could be supported that the applied spatial policy in<br />

Greece attracts a relatively low interest compared to other sectoral policies. Consequently,<br />

objectives regarding regulation of space are not always explicit and compatible while<br />

sustainable management of space, protection of environment and relaxation of regional<br />

inequalities still remain issues that need to be managed and placed into a proper policy<br />

context.<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

This paper has dealt with theoretical perspectives concerning forest land use change in<br />

general, as well as the factors of land use changes in Greece. Making informed land policy<br />

decisions is central to achieving sustainability at a regional level. Prior to formulating certain<br />

sustainable policy objectives and targets, the baseline information needed is the<br />

identification kind of the driving forces that influence current forest land use patterns.<br />

Generally speaking, these driving forces are closely associated with the economic, social and<br />

environmental context within which the regions exist and function. The effects on forest<br />

land of the predictor variables that where employed by this study, while significant in most<br />

regions are still characterized by many uncertainties. Some theoretically interesting<br />

explanatory variables have indicated that the effects of certain processes on land use<br />

changes may be important but not always straightforward.<br />

A synthesis and evaluation of the results brings up some important issues relevant to the<br />

theoretical framework of the field. In particular, a noticeable argument relates to the course<br />

of development of deforestation rate in the long term, when the major competing uses to<br />

forests are urban and not agricultural land uses as it is assumed by Angelesen’s (2007)<br />

model in the case of tropical deforestation. It seems that when the antagonism involves<br />

urban and forest land uses and when also the types of forest ecosystems fall into the<br />

category of not-productive forests (as it is the case for most Mediterranean forests) then<br />

land-rent generated by forest uses is unlikely to compensate for the one coming from urban<br />

development of the land. Urban land uses through market mechanisms will tend to outrage<br />

forests. As long as the Greek law is strongly opposed to the conversion of forest, it seems<br />

that, at least in the sort term, the only way of confronting this market-induced process might<br />

be the restructuring of the law enforcement mechanisms.<br />

On the other hand, it seems that in most urban prosperous regions as well as in their<br />

vicinity, deforestation has slowed down, although additional data need to be analysed.<br />

137


138<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Deforestation moves to more remote regions as accessibility improves. There are<br />

interactions amongst indirect population potential and illegal housing activity that influence<br />

the spatial distribution of deforestation rate. This complex relationship implies a<br />

geographical transfer and dispersion of illegal housing phenomenon from urbanized<br />

regions to remote, less-urbanized ones. It is likely that urban populations remain the major<br />

source of illegal housing activity; however they now tend to exercise this activity in longer<br />

distances due to accessibility improvements. If this is the case then deforestation controllers<br />

are still in urban areas even though the impacts of their acts are being systematically<br />

“exported” to other areas. The geographical transfer of deforestation relieves forests in the<br />

places of origin but at the same time, it escalates pressure on the host areas’ forests.<br />

An additional issue, relevant to the abovementioned argument, relates to the geographical<br />

characteristics of the areas being deforested. In insular prefectures, land surface is a scare<br />

resource and areas covered with forests are limited. If such spatial units were involved in a<br />

lengthy urban-forest land use antagonism, it would probably be difficult for all stages of forest<br />

transition theory to take place. Due to geographical remoteness, small-sized insular regions<br />

cannot easily base part of their development on exploiting the land of adjacent regions. Thus, it<br />

is difficult for islands to “export” deforestation processes. Bearing in mind the scarcity of<br />

developable land, high rents associated with urban land uses, the lack of forest cadastral maps<br />

and the insufficient forest law enforcement mechanisms, it is more likely for insular forests to<br />

move to the direction proposed by the theory of the tragedy of commons rather than the one<br />

proposed by forest transition theory. Even if the country as a whole managed to increase its<br />

forests, there would probably be winners and losers at the regional scale.<br />

Generally speaking, the spread of urban uses in the countryside has negatively affected forests<br />

either directly or indirectly. The improvement of transportation infrastructure, the expansion<br />

of urban plans, urban sprawl, illegal housing activity and legal building construction activity<br />

create a complex negative background for forest land uses. On the other hand, changes in<br />

Gross Domestic Product in agriculture and change in tourism infrastructure either have<br />

limited or zero adverse impacts on forests. It seems that the observed improvement in the<br />

performance of agricultural sector in the relevant regions has not occurred in the expense of<br />

forests through some expansion of cultivated land. In addition, new tourism accommodation<br />

infrastructure, possibly due to the mandatory environmental impact assessment introduced in<br />

the early ‘90s, had limited negative effects on forests. However, regions with high growth in<br />

their tourism accommodation in ex-urban areas show significant signs of deforestation.<br />

In the context of planning a sustainable forest policy, accessibility issues as well as the<br />

spatial patterns generated by urban phenomena such as urban sprawl and illegal housing<br />

are of crucial importance. At first glance, the improvement in the regional level of prosperity<br />

might be associated with lower deforestation rate. However, it is not certain whether this<br />

additional prosperity has been achieved in a sustainable manner. It is likely that<br />

improvement in prosperity at some location has been achieved in the expense of forests at<br />

some other location. These results could guide further research into improving the<br />

understanding of spatial processes such as forest land use changes and into rationalizing<br />

forest-related decision making. Strategic project monitoring and appraisal as well as<br />

evaluation of project impacts on land uses can help spatial planners and land use decisionmakers<br />

to introduce specific environmental protection objectives into land development and<br />

planning processes.


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

7. References<br />

Agarwal, C., C. Green, et al. (2002). A Review and Assessment of Land-Use Change Models.<br />

Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice. CIPEC Collaborative Report Series<br />

No. 1, Center for the Study of Institutions Population, and <strong>Environment</strong>al Change<br />

<strong>India</strong>na University.<br />

Allen, P., M. FitzSimmons, et al. (2003). "Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the<br />

tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California." Journal of Rural Studies<br />

19(1): 61-75.<br />

Amin, S. (1976). Unequal development Sassex, Harvester press.<br />

Andersen, M. S. and I. Massa (2000). "Ecological modernization - origins, dilemmas and<br />

future directions." Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Policy and Planning 2(4): 337-345.<br />

Angelsen, A. (2007). Forest Cover Change in Space and Time: Combining the von Thünen<br />

and Forest Transition Theories. Policy Research Working Paper 4117, The World<br />

Bank: 1-43.<br />

Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality: The El Farol Problem.<br />

Given at the American Economic Association Annual Meetings, 1994, Session:<br />

Complexity in Economic Theory, chaired by Paul Krugman. Published in Amer.<br />

Econ. Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84, 406, 1994. Los Alamos, USA, Santa Fe<br />

Institute.<br />

Arthur, W. B. (2005). Out-of-Equilibrium Economics and Agent-Based Modeling. ''Paper<br />

prepared for Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based<br />

Computational Economics, K. Judd and L. Tesfatsion, eds, ELSEVIER/North-<br />

Holland, forthcoming 2005.''. Los Alamos, USA, Santa Fe Intitute.<br />

Aspinall, R. (2004). "Modelling land use change with generalized linear models--a multimodel<br />

analysis of change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana."<br />

Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Management 72(1-2): 91-103.<br />

Baulies, X. and G. Szejwach (1998). LUCC Data Requirements Workshop: Survey of needs,<br />

gaps and priorities on data for land-use/land-cover change research; in LUCC<br />

Report Series; no 3. Barcelona,, Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya,.<br />

Briassoulis, H. (2000). "Analysis of land use change: Theoretical and modelling approaches<br />

in: The web book of regional science,<br />

http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Briassoulis/contents.htm."<br />

Buttel, F. H. (2000). "Ecological modernization as social theory." Geoforum 31(1): 57-65.<br />

Chhabra, A., H. Geist, et al. (2006). Multiple impacts of land-use /cover change. Land-use<br />

and Land-cover change: Local processes and global implication. E. F. Lambin and<br />

H. J. Geist. Wurzburg, Springer: 71-116.<br />

Chomitz, K. M. and D. A. Gray (1996). "Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model<br />

applied to Belize." World Bank Economic Review 10(3): 487-512.<br />

Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the <strong>Environment</strong>. Oxford Oxford University Press.<br />

Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., E. M. Crenshaw, et al. (2002). "Deforestation and the <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Kuznets Curve: A Cross-National Investigation of Intervening Mechanisms." Social<br />

Science Quarterly 83(1): 226-243.<br />

Elands, B. and F. Wiersum (2001). "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an<br />

exploration of socio-political discourses " Forest Policy and Economics 3(1-2): 5-16.<br />

Evans, N., C. Morris, et al. (2002). "Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of postproductivism<br />

as the new orthodoxy." Progress in Human Geography 26(3): 313-332.<br />

Feagan, R. (2007). "The place of food: mapping out the 'local' in local food systems." Progress<br />

in Human Geography 31(1): 23-42.<br />

139


140<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fredj, K., G. Martνn-Herrαn, et al. (2004). "Slowing deforestation pace through subsidies: a<br />

differential game." Automatica 40(2): 301-309.<br />

Geist, H. and E. Lambin (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of<br />

proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study<br />

evidence; in LUCC Report Series; no 4.<br />

Geist, H., W. McConnell, et al. (2006). Causes and trajectories of Land-use /cover change.<br />

Land-use and Land-cover change: Local processes and global implication. H. Geist<br />

and E. Lambin. Wurzburg, Springer: 41-70.<br />

GLP (2005). Global Land Project, Science Plan and Implementation Strategy, IGBP Report<br />

No. 53 /IHDP Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat. Stockholm: 1-64.<br />

Grainger, A. (1995). "The Forest Transition: An Alternative Approach." Area 27(3): 242-251.<br />

Groot, J. C. J., W. A. H. Rossing, et al. (2007). "Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between<br />

nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality--A methodology to<br />

support discussions on land-use perspectives." Agriculture, Ecosystems &<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> 120(1): 58-69.<br />

Hardin, G. (1968). "The Tragedy of the Commons." Science 162(3859): 1243-1248.<br />

Herschel, E. (1997). "A General Statement of the Tragedy of the Commons." Population and<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 18(6): 515-531.<br />

Hinrichs, C. C. (2003). "The practice and politics of food system localization." Journal of<br />

Rural Studies 19(1): 33-45.<br />

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, New Jersey,<br />

Princeton University Press.<br />

Ingram, G. K. (1998). "Patterns of Metropolitan Development: What Have We Learned?"<br />

Urban Studies 35(7): 1019-1035.<br />

Irwin, E. G. and J. Geoghegan (2001). "Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit<br />

economic models of land use change." Agriculture, Ecosystems & <strong>Environment</strong><br />

85(1-3): 7-24.<br />

Koop, G. and L. Tole (1999). "Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation?"<br />

Journal of Development Economics 58(1): 231-244.<br />

Lambin, E., H. Geist, et al. (2006). Introduction: Local processes with global impacts. Landuse<br />

and Land-cover change: Local processes and global implication. H. Geist and E.<br />

Lambin. Wurzburg, Springer: 1-8.<br />

Lambin, E. F., B. L. Turner, et al. (2001). "The causes of land-use and land-cover change:<br />

moving beyond the myths." Global <strong>Environment</strong>al Change 11(4): 261.<br />

Lesschen, J. P., P. H. Verburg, et al. (2005). Statistical methods for analysing the spatial<br />

dimension of changes in land use and farming systems - LUCC Report Series 7, The<br />

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya and LUCC Focus 3<br />

Office, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.<br />

Mahapatra, K. and S. Kant (2005). "Tropical deforestation: a multinomial logistic model and<br />

some country-specific policy prescriptions." Forest Policy and Economics 7(1): 1-24.<br />

Marsden, T. (1998). "Agriculture beyond the treadmill? Issues for policy, theory and research<br />

practice." Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 265-275.<br />

Marsden, T. (2004). "The Quest for Ecological Modernisation: Re-Spacing Rural<br />

Development and Agri-Food Studies." Sociologia Ruralis 44(2): 129-146.<br />

McCarthy, J. (2005). "Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies - reactionary or<br />

radical?" Progress in Human Geography 29(6): 773-782.<br />

McCarthy, J. (2008). "Rural geography: globalizing the countryside." Progress in Human<br />

Geography 32(1): 129-137.


Deforestation Dynamics:<br />

A Review and Evaluation of Theoretical Approaches and Evidence from Greece<br />

McGee, T. (2007). "Many knowledge(s) of Southeast Asia: Rethinking Southeast Asia in real<br />

time." Asia Pacific Viewpoint 48(2): 270-280.<br />

McGee, T. (2008). "Managing the rural–urban transformation in East Asia in the 21st<br />

century." Sustainability Science 3(1): 155-167.<br />

Minetos, D. and S. Polyzos (2009). "Analysis of Agricultural land uses transformation in<br />

Greece: A multinomial regression model at the regional level." International Journal<br />

of Sustainable Planning and Development 43: 189-209.<br />

Minetos, D. and S. Polyzos (2010). "Deforestation processes in Greece: A spatial analysis by<br />

using an ordinal regression model." Forest Policy and Economics 12(6): 457-472.<br />

Munoz, F. (2003). "Lock living: Urban sprawl in Mediterranean cities." Cities 20(6): 381-385.<br />

NSSG (1994). Census of buildings on 1st December 1990. Pireas, Hellenic Republic.<br />

NSSG (1995). Pre-census data of the Agriculture and Livestock Census of the year<br />

1990/1991. Pireas, Hellenic Republic.<br />

NSSG (1999). Tourist statistics 1994-1996. Pireas, Hellinic Republic.<br />

NSSG (2004). Census of buildings on 1st December 2000. Athens, Hellenic Republic.<br />

NSSG (2004). Statistical Yearbook of Greece. Athens, Hellenic Republic.<br />

NSSG (2006). Building Activity Statistics for the Years 1997-2006. Pireas, Hellinic Republic.<br />

Perz, S. G. (2007). "Grand Theory and Context-Specificity in the Study of Forest Dynamics:<br />

Forest Transition Theory and Other Directions." The Professional Geographer 59(1):<br />

105-114.<br />

Platt, R. V. (2004). "Global and local analysis of fragmentation in a mountain region of<br />

Colorado." Agriculture, Ecosystems & <strong>Environment</strong> 101(2-3): 207-218.<br />

Polyzos, S. (2009). "Regional Inequalities and Spatial Economic Interdependence: Learning<br />

from the Greek Prefectures." International Journal of Sustainable Development and<br />

Planning 4(2): 123-142.<br />

Polyzos, S. and D. Minetos (2009). "Informal housing in Greece: A quantitative spatial<br />

analysis." Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management Journal<br />

2(11): 7-33.<br />

Rahman, H. and M. Yamao (2007). "Community based organic farming and social capital in<br />

different network structures: Studies in two farming communities in Bangladesh."<br />

American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 2(2): 62-68.<br />

Raynolds, L. (2000). "Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair<br />

trade movements." Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 297-309.<br />

Reid, R., T. Tomich, et al. (2006). Linking land-change science and policy: Current lessons<br />

and future integration. Land-use and Land-cover change: Local processes and<br />

global implication. E. Lambin and H. Geist. Wurzburg, Springer: 157-176.<br />

Roberts, T. and P. Greimes (2002). World-System theory and the environment: Towards a<br />

new synthesis. Sociological theory and the environment: Classical foundations,<br />

contemporary insights. R. Dunlap, F. Buttel, P. Dickens and A. Gijswijt. New York,<br />

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: 167-196.<br />

Santilli, M., P. Moutinho, et al. (2005). "Tropical Deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol."<br />

Climatic Change 71(3): 267-276.<br />

Seyfang, G. (2006). "Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local<br />

organic food networks." Journal of Rural Studies 22(4): 383-395.<br />

Shandra, J. M., B. London, et al. (2003). "<strong>Environment</strong>al degradation, environmental<br />

ssustainability, and overurbanisation in the developing world: A quantitative,<br />

cross-national analysis." Sociological Perspectives 46(3): 309-329.<br />

141


142<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Shucksmith, M. (1993). "Farm household behaviour and the transition to postproductivism."<br />

Journal of Agricultural Economics 44: 466–478.<br />

Smith, E. and T. Marsden (2004). "Exploring the ‘limits to growth’ in UK organics:beyond<br />

the statistical image." Journal of Rural Studies 20: 345–357.<br />

Smith, G. (2005). "Green Citizenship and the Social Economy." <strong>Environment</strong>al Politics 14(2):<br />

273-289.<br />

Stern, N. (2006). "What is the Economicsof Climate Change?" <strong>WORLD</strong> ECONOMICS • Vol.<br />

7 No. 2 April–June 7(2): 1-10.<br />

Thurston, L. and A. M. J. Yezer (1994). "Causality in the Suburbanization of Population and<br />

Employment." Journal of Urban Economics 35(1): 105-118.<br />

Upadhyay, T. P., B. Solberg, et al. (2006). "Use of models to analyse land-use changes,<br />

forest/soil degradation and carbon sequestration with special reference to Himalayan<br />

region: A review and analysis." Forest Policy and Economics 9(4): 349-371.<br />

van der Ploeg, J. D. (2000). "Revitalizing Agriculture: Farming Economically as Starting<br />

Ground for Rural Development." Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 497-511.<br />

van der Ploeg, J. D., H. Renting, et al. (2000). "Rural Development: From Practices and<br />

Policies towards Theory." Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 391-408.<br />

Verburg, P. (2006). "Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models."<br />

Landscape Ecology 21(8): 1171-1183.<br />

Verburg, P., K. Overmars, et al. (2006). "Analysis of the effects of land use change on<br />

protected areas in the Philippines." Applied Geography 26(2): 153-173.<br />

Verburg, P., P. Schot, et al. (2004). "Land use change modelling: Current practice and<br />

research priorities." GeoJournal 61(4): 309-324.<br />

Verburg, P., C. Schulp, et al. (2006). "Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the<br />

dynamics of European landscapes." Agriculture, Ecosystems & <strong>Environment</strong><br />

114(1): 39-56.<br />

Verburg, P., W. Soepboer, et al. (2002). "Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land<br />

Use: The CLUE-S Model." <strong>Environment</strong>al Management V30(3): 391-405.<br />

Walker, R. (2001). "Urban sprawl and natural areas encroachment: Linking land cover<br />

change and economic development in the Florida Everglades." Ecological<br />

Economics 37(3): 357-369.<br />

Walker, R. (2004). "Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of tropical<br />

deforestation." International Regional Science Review 27(3): 247-270.<br />

Winter, M. (2003). "Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism." Journal<br />

of Rural Studies 19(1): 23-32.<br />

Winter, M. (2005). "Geographies of food: agro-food geographies, food, nature, farmers and<br />

agency." Progress in Human Geography 29(5): 609-617.<br />

Wood, C. H. and D. Skole (1998). "Linking satellite, census, and survey data to study<br />

deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon." People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing<br />

and Social Science: 70-93.<br />

Xie, Y., M. Batty, et al. (2007). "Simulating Emergent Urban Form Using Agent-Based<br />

Modeling: Desakota in the Suzhou-Wuxian Region in China." Annals of the<br />

Association of American Geographers 97(3): 477-495.<br />

Zhang, Y. and K. Sasaki (2005). "Edge city formation and the resulting vacated business<br />

district." The Annals of Regional Science 39(3): 523-540.


Part 2<br />

Mapping Deforestation


Geospatial Analysis<br />

of Deforestation and Land Use Dynamics<br />

in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Nathaniel O. Adeoye 1,*, Albert A. Abegunde 2 and Samson Adeyinka 2<br />

1 Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife,<br />

2 Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife,<br />

Nigeria<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Deforestation is a complex phenomenon as there is little agreement about the components and<br />

the processes involved in it. FAO, (2001a) defined deforestation as ‘the conversion of forest to<br />

another land use or the long-term reduction of the tree canopy cover below the minimum 10<br />

percent threshold’. The world’s original forest area, estimated at about 6 billion hectares, has<br />

declined steadily and about one-third of the forests have been lost during the past few<br />

hundred years (Sharma et al., 1992). The forests and woodlands of North Africa and the<br />

Middle East, for example, declined by 60 percent; those of South Asia by 43 percent; of tropical<br />

Africa by 20 percent; and of Latin America by 19 percent (Houghton et al. in WRI, 1987).<br />

Although the world’s forest area has been declining for centuries, it is in the last half of 20th<br />

century that the process was accelerated to an alarming rate (Osemeobo, 1991; Federal<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Protection Agency, 1992; Jaiyeoba, 2002). Since the 1960s, there has been a<br />

major change in the rate at which the forests are cleared. FAO, (1997) reported annual rates<br />

of deforestation in developing countries at 15.5 million hectares for the period 1980-1990 and<br />

13.7 million hectares for the period 1990 - 1995. The total forest area lost during the 15-year<br />

period was more than 220 million hectares, much larger than the total land area of Mexico.<br />

Between 1950 and 1983, the area of Africa’s woodlands and forests declines by 23% from 901<br />

to 690 million hectares. Between 1981 and 1985 tropical African countries such as Nigeria,<br />

Cote d’lvoire, Sudan and Zaire were losing their forest at annual rates of 4.0%, 2.5%, 5.0%<br />

and 3.7%, respectively (IBRD/World Bank, 1992). In absolute terms, tropical forests in Africa<br />

are being lost at the rate of 3.7 million hectare a year with over half of the deforestation in<br />

West Africa alone (UNEP, 2002). The rate of deforestation in Nigeria in the 1980s was of the<br />

order of 400,000 ha yearly, while afforestation was a mere 3,200 ha. At such rates, Nigeria’s<br />

remaining forest area would disappear by 2020 (Jaiyeoba, 2002).<br />

Deforestation and forest degradations are now widely recognized as one of the most critical<br />

environmental problems facing the human society today with serious long term economic,<br />

social and ecological consequences. This issue has received much attention from policy makers<br />

to general public in recent years with vivid images of cleared forests and burning trees around<br />

*Corresponding Author<br />

8


146<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

the world. One of the consequences of deforestation is that the carbon originally held in forests<br />

is released to the atmosphere, either immediately if the trees are burned, or more slowly as<br />

unburned organic matter decays (Moutinho and Schwartzman, 2005). As reported by Diaz, et<br />

al., (2002), tropical deforestation in the Amazon alone is responsible for 2/3 of the Brazilian<br />

greenhouse gas emissions and it is estimated that 200 million tons of carbon, not including<br />

emissions from forest fires, are released annually into the atmosphere.<br />

The effect of deforestation on biodiversity and climate change has been the subject of scientific<br />

studies and many documentaries of media. Achard et al., 2002; Houghton, 2003; Fearnside and<br />

Laurance, 2004, revealed in their studies that Global deforestation and forest degradation rates<br />

have a significant impact on the accumulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere.<br />

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2001) estimated that during the 1990s 16.1<br />

million hectares per year were affected by deforestation, most of them in the tropics. The<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calculated that, for the same period, the<br />

contribution of land-use changes to GHG accumulation into the atmosphere was 1.6±0.8 Giga<br />

(1 G = 109) tonnes of carbon per year (Prentice et al., 2001), a quantity that corresponds to 25%<br />

of the total annual global emissions of GHGs. The United Nations Framework Convention on<br />

Climate Change (UNFCCC), in recognizing climate change as a serious threat, urged counties<br />

to take up measures to enhance and conserve ecosystems such as forests that act as reservoirs<br />

and sinks of GHGs. The Kyoto Protocol (KP), adopted in 1997, complements the UNFCCC by<br />

providing an enforceable agreement with quantitative targets for reducing GHG emissions.<br />

Besides, Aina and Salau, (1992) and Adesina, (1997) reported that forest loss leads to loss of<br />

wildlife habitats and extinction of plant and animal species that play important roles in<br />

maintaining a balance in the environment.<br />

From the foregoing, it becomes obvious that the world tropical forest including Nigeria is<br />

depleting fast because of human influence. This is a problem at the macro and micro-level;<br />

such depletion is the result of government activities such as road development, arable<br />

farming, and land clearing for pasture (Osemeobo, 1991; Taylor et al., 1994; and Olofin,<br />

2000). Statistical estimates have also shown that there is a negative correlation between<br />

exploitation of the forest and conservation in Nigeria that is, the annual rate of forest los is<br />

greater than the rate of conservation (Osemeobo, 1990).<br />

The state of forests in general and tropical forests in particular, has been drawing the<br />

increasing disturbing attention of the world community. For instance, in the tropics, where<br />

about 2.5 billion people depend on natural forest resources for many economic and<br />

environmental goods and services, the depletion of forests has been posing threat to their<br />

means of livelihood.<br />

Recently, the United Nations initiated a global awareness through its Global <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Outlook 2000 (GEO, 2000). In the developed countries of Europe and America, this<br />

awareness is high and it is the cause of several policies and strategies aimed at<br />

environmental preservation and conservation. In developing countries the awareness is just<br />

emerging. Presently 115 nations have <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection Agencies (EPA) and more<br />

than 215 international environmental treaties have been signed on issues bothering on<br />

global warming, biodiversity, ocean pollution, ozone layer depletion, and export of<br />

hazardous wastes (Ibah, 2001).<br />

In Nigeria, government is also taking steps to correct the nation’s degenerated<br />

environmental condition. One of such efforts is the establishment of Federal <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Protection Agencies (FEPA), (now a department under the Ministry of <strong>Environment</strong>), with


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

its branches in all the states to monitor environmental quality including the forest resources.<br />

Very recently, and considering the need for environmental preservation, the government<br />

has established the Federal Ministry of <strong>Environment</strong> to oversee the country’s environmental<br />

problems. Many Non – Governmental Organizations (NGOs) have also sprung up to discuss<br />

environmental degradation and proffer solutions (Ogunsanya, 2000).<br />

The waves of concern on the state of our forest resources and the condition of the<br />

environment, have translated into a number of researches. Among the academics, studies<br />

have clearly revealed that forests worldwide have been and are being threatened by<br />

uncontrolled degradation and conversion to other types of land uses, influenced by<br />

increasing human pressure due to uncontrolled increase in human population resulting in<br />

agricultural expansion; and environmentally harmful mismanagement, including, for<br />

example, lack of adequate forest-fire control and anti-poaching measures, unsustainable<br />

commercial logging, overgrazing and unregulated browsing, harmful effects of airborne<br />

pollutants, economic incentives and other measures taken by other sectors of the economy<br />

(Houghton et al. in WRI, 1987; Sharma et al., 1992; Olofin, 2000; IPCC, 2000; FAO, 2001a;<br />

WRI, 2001; Jaiyeoba, 2002). Scholarly writings have also tried to explain the dimension<br />

and severity on global environmental changes (Arokoyu, 1999; Ogunsanya, 2000 and<br />

Jaiyeoba, 2002).<br />

Studies have also explored the causal factors of deforestation. For example, there is a general<br />

agreement that deforestation is due to drought, forest fire, use of fuel wood, spread of<br />

extensive agriculture, and rapid urbanization, among others, (Areola, 1994; Olofin, 2000;<br />

Meyer and Turner, 1992; Taylor et al., 1994 and Smith, 1993). There are also substantial and<br />

growing works on resource management and conservation for the purpose of improving the<br />

environment (Areola, 1994; Smith, 1993; Mitchell, 1989; Munro et al., 1986; Olokesusi, 1992;<br />

Reed, 1996 and Rees, 1990).<br />

In 2001, FAO published the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000), which<br />

was largely based on information provided by the countries themselves and a remote<br />

sensing survey of tropical countries. It was supplemented by special studies undertaken by<br />

FAO. Among the outputs were two new global forest cover maps, estimates of forest cover,<br />

deforestation rates and forest biomass for each country, and several specialized studies on<br />

such topics as forest management and forest fires (FAO, 2001).<br />

But Boroffice, (2006) argued that the often-quoted rates of deforestation for Nigeria were<br />

based on mere estimates or surrogate data rather than empirical studies. Most of the<br />

vegetation maps produced by international organizations, such as FAO, for the country are<br />

nothing more than broad generalizations which are not usually in tandem with local<br />

realities and are therefore, of little use to local authorities for planning purposes. Thus, the<br />

rate of forest loss at both local and national levels is not known with any accuracy.<br />

To further the frontiers of knowledge on the state of the forest resources, which is still an<br />

inconclusive issue and to establish the emergence land use pattern from the depleted forest<br />

area, this study therefore, examines and analyses the extent of forest loss and land use<br />

dynamics; measures the rates of change over the periods of 25 years (1978-2003) in a part<br />

of southwestern Nigeria using a set of remotely sensed images and geographic<br />

information system (GIS) technology. There is a consensus among scientists that satellite<br />

images and GIS provide a reliable means for adequate and regular monitoring of forest<br />

estate. According to Ayeni (2001), application of GIS in environmental monitoring in<br />

147


148<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

developing world is still at its infancy yet; it has been extensively used in Europe and<br />

North America. Recognizing the importance of reliable tool for forest monitoring both for<br />

environmental sustainability as well as economic well being, there is, therefore, need to<br />

explore the tool in the developing world.<br />

The specific objectives of study are to:<br />

i. identify the categories of land use and land cover from remotely sensed images;<br />

ii. measure the areal extent of each of the land uses/covers<br />

iii. assess the rate(s) of change in land use and forest area and compare the rates of change<br />

over time; and<br />

iv. analyze the temporal patterns of land use and changes in forest coverage area over the<br />

period 1978-2003<br />

2. The study area<br />

Studies on deforestation can be carried out in any part of the world where growth in<br />

human population has taken place, which still has potential for further growth and<br />

development. The choice of the study area is however, guided by the primary objective of<br />

the study to examine the occurrence of deforestation, which is better perceived in area<br />

where there has been rapid urbanization as the case of the study area. The study area is a<br />

region located in Southwestern Nigeria, well known for its dense forest resources and<br />

fertile soils. However, as a result of rapid population growth, which led to the<br />

development of urban centres and increased farming activities, much of the forest areas<br />

have been converted to farmlands, perhaps to meet the needs of the teaming population.<br />

The emerging concern about the disappearance of forests in the study area therefore<br />

presents the reason for a study of this nature. Coincidentally there is a preponderance of<br />

various types of data from which the type of study envisaged here can be expected with<br />

minimum difficulty. Besides, the concern for sustainability provides the impetus for the<br />

choice of the area.<br />

The study area spans part of Osun and Ekiti States (Figure1) and lies within latitude 7° 30´<br />

and 7° 45´ North of equator and longitude 4° 30´ and 5° 00´ East of the Greenwich (Figure<br />

2). It is about 866.25 sq kilometres rectangle in size. On the Nigeria topographical map, it<br />

is found in Ilesa sheet 243. The relief is rugged with undulating areas and granitic outcrops<br />

in several places. The notable ones among the hills are the Efon-Alaaye hill to the<br />

east of the study area, and domed hills in Ilesa area. The climate is of the lowland Tropical<br />

rain forest type with distinct wet and dry seasons. Many factors are responsible for the<br />

removal of forest resources in the area; among them are intensive agricultural practices,<br />

the establishment of more local government areas in recent years, the development of<br />

tertiary institutions and location of industrial plants as the case of Ilesa, which led to the<br />

influx of people to the area and subsequent development of housing estate and<br />

infrastructures.<br />

According to 1991census figure, the study area is a populated area. Because of the dense<br />

population, the area has witnessed great structural development and growth, which in effect<br />

brought negative impact to the natural resources. The area of major population<br />

concentration is Ilesa with population of 130,321 based on 1991 census figure. Other<br />

populated areas include Ijebu-Ijesa, Efon-Alaaye, to mention but a few.


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

or<br />

B ipe<br />

Ob ok un<br />

Iles ha We st<br />

EK ITI<br />

OS UN<br />

Iles ha Sou th<br />

Ori ad e<br />

A ta ku mo sa E as t<br />

A ta ku mo sa W<br />

es t<br />

E fo n<br />

E k<br />

iti W e st<br />

OSUN<br />

Boripe<br />

Obokun<br />

Ilesha West<br />

Ilesha South<br />

Oriade<br />

Atakumosa West<br />

Atakumosa East<br />

Efon<br />

Ekiti West<br />

EKITI<br />

50 0 50 100 Kilometers<br />

LEGEND<br />

Ekiti state<br />

Osun state<br />

Fig. 1. The LGAs of the study area<br />

415000<br />

410000<br />

405000<br />

400000<br />

395000<br />

390000<br />

385000<br />

775000<br />

Osu<br />

775000<br />

780000<br />

Ilase<br />

Ibodi<br />

780000<br />

785000<br />

Idom inasi<br />

ILESA<br />

785000<br />

LGAs of the study area<br />

790000<br />

790000<br />

795000<br />

795000<br />

800000<br />

800000<br />

805000<br />

Ilare Esa-Odo Esa-Oke<br />

Ipole<br />

Iloko<br />

Iw araja<br />

Ijebu-Ijesa<br />

Ijeda<br />

Erinmo<br />

Erin-Ijesa<br />

Erin-Oke<br />

Ipetu-Ijesa<br />

805000<br />

6.8 0 6.8 13.6 Kilometers<br />

Fig. 2. Major communities of the study area<br />

810000<br />

Aramoko-Ekiti<br />

810000<br />

Ikogosi<br />

Ogotun<br />

815000<br />

815000<br />

W<br />

415000<br />

410000<br />

405000<br />

400000<br />

395000<br />

390000<br />

385000<br />

N<br />

S<br />

E<br />

LEGEND<br />

W<br />

Main road<br />

Major Towns<br />

N<br />

S<br />

E<br />

149


150<br />

3. Conceptual clarification<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

3.1 Deforestation<br />

Deforestation is a complex phenomenon as there is little agreement about the components<br />

and its process. FAO (2001a) defined it as ‘the conversion of forest to another land use or the<br />

long-term reduction of the tree canopy cover below the minimum 10 percent threshold’.<br />

Deforestation is also referred to as “complete destruction of forest canopy cover through<br />

clearing for agriculture, cattle ranching, plantations, or other non-forest purposes” (Poor,<br />

1976; and Mayaux and Malingreau, 1996). Other forms of land-use changes, such as, forest<br />

fragmentation (altering the spatial continuity and creating a mosaic of forest blocks and<br />

other land cover types), and degradation (selective logging of woody species for economic<br />

purposes that affects the forest canopy and the biodiversity) are often included in estimating<br />

deforestation. The characterization of forest into one of these categories depends on the<br />

temporal and spatial scale of observation. The subjective meaning of the term deforestation<br />

is thus not only linked to a value system but also to the nature of the measurement designed<br />

to assess it (Poor, 1976; and Mayaux and Malingreau, 1996). Adopting different perspectives<br />

of deforestation in data analysis have caused considerable variations in estimation of the<br />

area of forest cleared.<br />

3.2 Facts about deforestation<br />

The world’s original forest area, estimated at about 6 billion hectares, has been declining<br />

steadily. About one-third of the forests have been lost during the past few hundred years<br />

(Sharma, et al., 1992). Between 1850 and 1980 about 15 percent of the earth’s forests and<br />

woodlands disappeared as a result of human activities. While the forests and woodlands of<br />

North Africa and the Middle East, declined by 60 percent; those of South Asia by 43 percent<br />

that of tropical Africa declined by 20 percent; and of Latin America by 19 percent.<br />

Depletion of forests is of particular significance because in the tropics, about 2.5 billion of<br />

her people depend directly or indirectly on natural forest resources for many economic and<br />

environmental goods and services. Between 1980 and 1985 the estimated annual rate of<br />

tropical deforestation was 0.6 percent or 11.4 million hectares (FAO, 1988). Recent studies<br />

estimates deforestation in the tropics at a rate of 17 to 20 million hectares annually (Rowe et<br />

al, 1992). Although the world’s forest area has been declining for centuries, it is within the<br />

last half of the 20th century that the process became accelerated. Since the 1960s, there has<br />

been a major change in the rate at which the forests are cleared. A recent study by FAO<br />

(1997) puts the annual rates of deforestation in developing countries at 15.5 million hectares<br />

for the period 1980-1990 and 13.7 million hectares for the period 1990 - 1995. The total forest<br />

area lost during the 15-year period was more than 29.2 million hectares.<br />

In 1999, the FAO reported that 10.5 per cent of Africa’s forest had been lost between 1980<br />

and 1995, the highest rate in the developing world and in sharp contrast to the net<br />

afforestation seen in developed countries. Forest loss between 1990 and 2000 was more than<br />

50 million hectares, representing an average deforestation rate of nearly 0.8 per cent per year<br />

over this period (FAO, 2001a). Between 1990 and 2002, a total of 12 million hectares of<br />

forests were deforested, of which sub-regional West Africa accounted for 15% of the<br />

countries (UNEP, 2002). The rate of deforestation in Nigeria in the 1980s was of the order of<br />

400,000 ha yearly, while re-afforestation was a mere 3,200 ha. At such rates, Nigeria’s<br />

remaining forest area would disappear by 2020 (Jaiyeoba, 2002). On the global scale, the rate<br />

of tropical deforestation is not known with any accuracy (World Resources Institute, 2003).


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

This informs gap in our knowledge. However, certain factors have been advanced to be<br />

responsible for deforestation and forest degeneration.<br />

3.3 Causes of deforestation<br />

Deforestation occurs for many reasons but it is important to distinguish between the causes<br />

that are directly related to deforestation and those that are underlying. The direct causes are<br />

those activities (by individuals, corporations, government agencies, or development<br />

projects), which clear forests. Underlying causes are those behind the direct causes, which<br />

motivate the direct causes. (http://www.wrm.org.uy/deforestation/UN report.html).<br />

Direct causes include commercial timber production, clearing of land for agriculture and<br />

urban expansion, and harvesting of wood for fuel and charcoal. These activities also open<br />

up forests by the construction of access roads to logging sites, fragmenting the forests and<br />

facilitating further clearance, resource extraction, and grazing by locals and commercial<br />

organizations (Rowe et al., 1992; UNDP, UNEP, World Bank and WRI, 2000; State of the<br />

World's Forests, 2001). According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate<br />

Change, the overwhelming direct cause of deforestation is agriculture. Subsistence farming<br />

is responsible for 48% of deforestation; commercial agriculture is responsible for 32% of<br />

deforestation; logging is responsible for 14% of deforestation and fuel wood removals make<br />

up 5% of deforestation (UNFCCC, 2007).<br />

Indirect (underlying) causes of deforestation include population growth, policies,<br />

agreements, legislation, lack of stakeholder participation and market factors that encourage<br />

the use of forest products, leading to loss, fragmentation or degradation (Rodgers, Salehe<br />

and Olson, 2000). Other causes of forest loss are conflict, civil wars and lack of good<br />

governance (Verolme and Moussa, 1999).<br />

In Africa as in all parts of the world, deforestation were caused by a combination of natural<br />

and human factors, the chief of which has been the conversion of forest lands to agricultural<br />

land (Adesina, 1997; Rowe et al., 1992). As Williams (1990) reported, the introduction of new<br />

crops and new methods of exploitations around 1600 radically altered tropical forests. It was<br />

reiterated that forests were cleared to make way for cash crops such as, rubber in Malaysia<br />

and Indonesia, coffee in Brazil, tea in <strong>India</strong> and China, sugar cane in the Caribbean, tobacco<br />

and oil palm in Asia.<br />

Ola-Adams (1981) attributed the removal of forested areas to intensive agricultural<br />

practices. It was reported that approximately 2,000 hectares of western edge of Ogbesere<br />

forest reserve in Nigeria had been cut over and replaced by permanent agriculture. The<br />

study further revealed that in some other parts of the high forest, several areas of forest<br />

estate were being de-reserved for the establishment of agricultural crops. Besides, in the<br />

current efforts to diversify the country’s economy, large areas of high forest zones were<br />

being cleared and planted with food and tree crops; 45,845 ha. for food crops; 10,000 ha. for<br />

oil palm; 73,000 ha. for cocoa and about 140,000 ha. for rubber plantations.<br />

There are many causes of contemporary deforestation, among them are corruption of<br />

government institutions (Burgonio, 2008; WRM, 2003), the inequitable distribution of wealth<br />

and power (Global Deforestation, 2006), population growth (Marcoux, 2000), and<br />

overpopulation (Butler, 2009; Stock and Rochen, 2009), and urbanization (Karen, 2003).<br />

Globalization is often viewed as another root cause of deforestation (YaleGlobal, 2007; Butler,<br />

2009), though there are cases in which the impacts of globalization (new flows of labour,<br />

capital, commodities, and ideas) have promoted localized forest recovery (Hecht, et al, 2006).<br />

151


152<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Experts do not agree on whether industrial logging is an important contributor to global<br />

deforestation (Angelsen and Kaimowitz, 1999; Laurance, 1999). Some argue that poor people<br />

are more likely to clear forest because they have no alternatives, others that the poor lack the<br />

ability to pay for the materials and labour needed to clear forest (Angelsen and Kaimowitz,<br />

1999). One study found that population increases due to high fertility rates were a primary<br />

driver of tropical deforestation in only 8% of cases (Geist and Lambin, 2002). However, a<br />

shift in the drivers of deforestation over the past 30 years has been noted. Whereas<br />

deforestation was primarily driven by subsistence activities and government-sponsored<br />

development projects like transmigration in countries like Indonesia and colonization in<br />

Latin America, <strong>India</strong>, Java, and so on, during late 19th century and the earlier half of the<br />

20th century. By the 1990s the majority of deforestation was caused by industrial factors,<br />

including extractive industries, large-scale cattle ranching and extensive agriculture (Rudel,<br />

2005; Butler and Laurance, 2008).<br />

3.4 Effects of deforestation<br />

Deforestation causes extinction, changes to climatic conditions, desertification, and<br />

displacement of populations (Sahney, et al, 2010). It is a contributor to global warming<br />

(Fearnsidel and Laurance, 2004) and is often cited as one of the major causes of the enhanced<br />

greenhouse effect. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,<br />

deforestation mainly in tropical areas, could account for up to one-third of total anthropogenic<br />

carbon dioxide emissions (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report). But recent calculations suggest<br />

that carbon dioxide emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (excluding peatland<br />

emissions) contribute about 12% of total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions with a range<br />

from 6 to 17% (Van der Werf, et al, 2009). Scientists also state that, Tropical deforestation<br />

releases 1.5 billion tones of carbon each year into the atmosphere (Defries, 2007).<br />

Reducing emissions from the tropical deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in<br />

developing countries has emerged as new potential to complement ongoing climate policies.<br />

The idea consists in providing financial compensations for the reduction of greenhouse gas<br />

(GHG) emissions from deforestation and forest degradation" (Wertz-Kanounnikoff and<br />

Alvarado, 2007).<br />

Deforestation results in declines in biodiversity. Estimate shows that rainforest is losing 137<br />

plant, animal and insect species every single day due to deforestation, which equates to 50,000<br />

species a year (Rainforest Facts, 2010). Leakey and Roger, (1996) state that tropical rainforest<br />

deforestation contributed to the ongoing Holocene mass extinction. But scientific<br />

understanding of the process of extinction is insufficient to accurately make predictions about<br />

the impact of deforestation on biodiversity (Pimm, et al, 1995). Most predictions of forestry<br />

related biodiversity loss are based on species-area models, with an underlying assumption that<br />

as the forest declines species diversity will decline similarly. However, many such models<br />

have been proven to be wrong and loss of habitat does not necessarily lead to large scale loss<br />

of species. Species-area models are known to over-predict the number of species known to be<br />

threatened in areas where actual deforestation is ongoing, and greatly over-predict the number<br />

of threatened species that are widespread (Pimm, et al, 1995).<br />

3.5 Control<br />

Major international organizations, including the United Nations and the World Bank, have<br />

begun to develop programs aimed at curbing deforestation. The blanket term Reducing


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) describes these sorts of<br />

programs, which use direct monetary or other incentives to encourage developing countries<br />

to limit and/or roll back deforestation. Funding has been an issue, but at the UN<br />

Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties-15 (COP-<br />

15) in Copenhagen in December 2009, an accord was reached with a collective commitment<br />

by developed countries for new and additional resources, including forestry and<br />

investments through international institutions, that will approach USD 30 billion for the<br />

period 2010 - 2012 (UNFCC, 2009). Significant work is underway on tools for use in<br />

monitoring developing country adherence to their agreed REDD targets. These tools, which<br />

rely on remote forest monitoring using satellite imagery and other data sources, include the<br />

Center for Global Development's FORMA (Forest Monitoring for Action) initiative<br />

(FORMA, 2009) and the Group on Earth Observations' Forest Carbon Tracking <strong>Portal</strong>, (GEO<br />

FCT, 2010). Methodological guidance for forest monitoring was also emphasized at COP-15<br />

(UNFCC, 2009).<br />

4. Methodology<br />

4.1 Data acquisition and image processing<br />

Remotely sensed data of different sources were used for this study (Figures 1, 2, 3, & 4). This is<br />

because of the constraint of the availability of field data in this part of the world. These are<br />

Landsat MSS, acquired on March 15, 1978 of 80m spatial resolution; SPOT XS, obtained on<br />

May 19, 1986 and SPOT XS acquired on November 28, 1994, of 20m spatial resolution<br />

respectively; NigeriaSat_1 acquired on September 23, 2003, of 32m spatial resolution (Table 1).<br />

S/no Data type Date/Year<br />

obtained<br />

1. Landsat MSS<br />

March 15,<br />

1978<br />

2. SPOT XS<br />

May 19,<br />

1986<br />

3. SPOT XS November<br />

28, 1994<br />

4. NigeriaSat-1<br />

September<br />

23, 2003<br />

Spatial<br />

Resolution<br />

80m 185km<br />

20m 60km<br />

20m 60km<br />

32m 600km<br />

Source: Author’s field survey<br />

Table 1. Attributes of the images used for the Study<br />

Swath Spectral bands Agency<br />

4 Bands [Blue,<br />

Green, Red &<br />

Near infrared]<br />

3 Bands [Green,<br />

Red & Infrared]<br />

3 Bands [Green,<br />

Red & Infrared]<br />

3 Bands [Nearinfrared,<br />

Red &<br />

Green]<br />

153<br />

FORMECU,<br />

Abuja, Nigeria<br />

RECTAS, Ile-Ife,<br />

Nigeria<br />

FORMECU,<br />

Abuja, Nigeria<br />

NASRDA,<br />

Abuja, Nigeria<br />

Ideally, studies such as this would be better conceived if images were acquired twice a year<br />

to allow for seasonal variation in foliage coverage. In southwestern Nigeria for instance, the<br />

rainy season spans the period of eight months that is, between March and October while the<br />

dry season starts from November and lasts until February. The images used are both<br />

acquired in rainy season (Landsat MSS, 1978, SPOT XS, 1986 and NigeriaSat-1, 2003) and dry<br />

season (SPOT XS, 1994). These differences in the date of acquisition may cause disparity in


154<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

the results. However, they were used because of the spectral information of the study area<br />

they contain.<br />

The data were extracted as a sub-scene from the original dataset. For the purpose of<br />

temporal land use/cover change detection, a common window covering the same<br />

geographical coordinates of the study area was extracted from the scene of the images<br />

obtained. The sub-map operation of ILWIS 3.2 Academic allows the user to specify a<br />

rectangular part of a raster map to be used. To extract the study area from the whole scene<br />

of the images obtained, the numbers of rows and columns of the area were specified. While<br />

Landsat MSS 1978 contained 600 lines and 733 columns pixels, SPOT XS 1986 and 1994<br />

consist of 1373 lines and 2005 columns pixels, respectively, when NigeriaSat_1 2003 has 1083<br />

lines and 1150 columns of pixels.<br />

Fig. 3. Landsat Multispectral (MSS) 1978<br />

The false colour composite was used for all the image data to relate colours and patterns in<br />

the image data to the real world features. For Landsat MSS 1978, channel 1 was assigned to<br />

red plane, channel 2 to green plane, and channel 3 to blue plane. This makes the band Red,<br />

Blue, Green (RBG-123) false colour composite. For SPOT XS 1986 and 1994, channel 3 was<br />

assigned red plane, channel 2 to green and channel 1 to blue plane. The band combination<br />

then consisted of Blue, Green and Red (BGR-321) to produce false colour composite. For<br />

NigeriaSat_1 2003 false colour composite, channel 1 was assigned to red plane, channel 2 to<br />

green plane and channel 3 to blue plane. This puts the band combination as Red, Green and<br />

Blue (RGB-123).


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Fig. 4. SPOT Satellite XS 1986<br />

With constraints such as spatial, spectral, temporal and radiometric resolution, relatively<br />

simple remote sensing devices cannot record adequately the complexity of the Earth’s land<br />

and water surfaces. Consequently, error creeps into the data acquisition process and can<br />

degrade the quality of the remotely sensed data collected. Therefore, it is necessary to<br />

preprocess the remotely sensed data before the actual analysis. Radiometric and geometric<br />

errors are the most common types of errors encountered in remotely sensed imagery. The<br />

commercial data provider has removed the radiometric and systematic errors of the data<br />

used. However, while the unsystematic geometric distortion remains in the image. The<br />

geometric errors were corrected using ground control points (GCP).<br />

The process of georeferencing in this study started with the identification of features on<br />

the image data, which can be clearly recognized on the topographical map of the study<br />

area and whose geographical locations were clearly defined. Stream intersections and the<br />

intersection of the highways were used as ground control points (GCP). The latitude and<br />

longitude of the GCPs of clearly seen features obtained in the base map were used to<br />

register the coordinates of the image data used for the study. All the images were<br />

georeferenced to Universal Transverse Mercator projection of WGS84 coordinate system,<br />

zone 31N with Clarke 1880 Spheroid. Nearest-neighbor re-sampling method was used to<br />

correct the data geometrically. A correlation threshold was used to accept or discard<br />

points. The correlation range was within limits that is, 1 pixel size. The x and y corrections<br />

were below 0.5 pixel.<br />

155


156<br />

Fig. 5. SPOT Satellite (XS) 1994<br />

Fig. 6. NigeriaSat-1 2003<br />

Deforestation Around the World


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

4.2 Classification<br />

In this study, the satellite images were classified using supervised classification method. The<br />

combine process of visual image interpretation of tones/colours, patterns, shape, size, and<br />

texture of the imageries and digital image processing were used to identify homogeneous<br />

groups of pixels, which represent various land use classes of interest. This process is<br />

commonly referred to as training sites because the spectral characteristics of those known<br />

areas are used to train the classification algorithm for eventual land use/cover mapping of<br />

the remainder of the images.<br />

To validate the tonal values recorded on the satellite images with the features obtained on the<br />

ground and also to know what type of land use/cover is actually present, the study engaged<br />

in ground truthing to five communities of the study area. These are Ilesa, Ijebu-Ijesa, Efon-<br />

Alaaye, Iloko-Ijesa and Erin-Oke (Figure 2). Before the ground truthing, map of the study area<br />

was printed and was used as guide to locate and identify features both on ground and on the<br />

image data. The geographical locations of the identified features on the ground were clearly<br />

defined. These were used as training samples for supervised classification of the remotely<br />

sensed images. Eight categories of land uses and land covers were clearly identified during<br />

ground truthing. These are forest/secondary re-growth, agro-forestry, arable farmlands,<br />

fallow/shrub, bare soils, water body, bare rocks and built-up areas/settlements.<br />

4.3 Accuracy assessment<br />

Determination of meaningful change categories was conducted by evaluating the<br />

classification accuracy. Every classified pixel has accuracy for a particular land use/cover<br />

type. The most common and typical method to assess classification accuracy Error Matrix<br />

(sometimes called a confusion matrix or contingency table) was used to assess the accuracy<br />

assessment for this study. Error matrix compares, on a category-by-category basis, the<br />

relationship between known referenced data and the corresponding results of an automated<br />

classification. Such matrices are square, with the number of rows and columns equal to the<br />

number of categories whose classification accuracy is being assessed (Jensen, 1996).<br />

5. Results and discussion<br />

5.1 Accuracy assessment of satellite images<br />

The accuracy assessment of four temporal data shows that most land use types were<br />

classified with acceptable level of accuracies. The low classification accuracies found in<br />

Arable farmlands, Agro-forestry and Fallow/Shrub classes was due to the similar spectral<br />

characteristics in them and the prevailing season, which posed constraint to the<br />

classification process. However, the overall accuracy of the land use categories makes the<br />

study reliable for planning. The average reliability of Landsat MSS 1978 was 57.24% while<br />

the overall accuracy was 76.20%; SPOT XS 1986 average reliability was 66.46% and the<br />

overall accuracy of 67.43%; SPOT XS 1994 average reliability was 65.04 % while the overall<br />

accuracy was 60.88%. NigeriaSat_1 2003 average reliability was 63.25 % and the overall<br />

accuracy was 72.05% (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5).<br />

Agrofo- Arable Bare Exposed Forest Settlement Shrub/ Water ACCURACY<br />

restry farmlands soils rock<br />

Fallow body<br />

Agroforestry 216 4 0 12 82 0 190 0 0.43<br />

Arable<br />

farmlands<br />

13 1801 302 74 1309 0 2782 10 0.29<br />

157


158<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Agrofo- Arable Bare Exposed Forest Settlement Shrub/ Water ACCURACY<br />

restry farmlands soils rock<br />

Fallow body<br />

Bare soils 3 1460 2417 44 271 74 359 6 0.52<br />

Exposed rock 0 82 77 4580 443 0 1 73 0.87<br />

Forest 70 549 50 2274 45232 0 3011 48 0.88<br />

Settlement 0 0 52 0 0 2695 0 0 0.98<br />

Shrub/Fallow 653 882 54 6 3809 0 5809 0 0.52<br />

Water body 0 55 26 129 274 0 1 33 0.06<br />

RELIABILITY 0.23 0.37 0.81 0.64 0.88 0.97 0.48 0.19<br />

Average Accuracy = 56.92 %<br />

Average Reliability = 57.24 %<br />

Overall Accuracy = 76.20 %<br />

Table 2. Matrix of land use/land cover for 1978<br />

Agroforestry Arable Bare Exposed Forest Settlement Shrub/ Water ACCURACY<br />

farmland soils rock<br />

fallow body<br />

Agroforestry 2027 0 1 0 1 0 29 0 0.82<br />

Arable<br />

farmland<br />

0 1254 241 10 0 0 38 544 0.57<br />

Bare soils 113 5000 3227 238 78 68 1000 3002 0.21<br />

Exposed rock 0 173 367 4052 21 0 29 2303 0.50<br />

Forest 214 15 146 146 23942 0 4431 4 0.72<br />

Settlement 0 3 41 0 0 22488 0 0 0.85<br />

Shrub/fallow 226 559 959 32 511 0 11444 21 0.80<br />

Water body 0 195 85 107 0 0 3 1381 0.78<br />

RELIABILITY 0.79 0.17 0.64 0.88 0.98 1.00 0.67 0.19<br />

Average Accuracy = 65.68 %<br />

Average Reliability = 66.46 %<br />

Overall Accuracy = 67.43 %<br />

Table 3. Matrix of land use/land cover for 1986<br />

Agroforestry<br />

Arable<br />

farmlands<br />

Bare<br />

soils<br />

Exposed<br />

rock<br />

Forest Settlement Shrub/<br />

fallow<br />

Water<br />

body<br />

ACCURACY<br />

Agro-forestry 3763 0 0 0 124 0 109 0 0.78<br />

Arable<br />

farmlands<br />

0 33 2 1 0 0 3 0 0.82<br />

Bare soils 5 7825 11370 1222 238 113 2717 274 0.41<br />

Exposed rock 0 139 493 15659 1890 0 940 19489 0.35<br />

Forest 711 4 0 678 22169 4 1071 141 0.87<br />

Settlement 0 0 54 0 0 25244 0 0 0.86<br />

Shrub/fallow 137 1031 466 120 861 3 8163 7 0.70<br />

Water body 0 5 34 64 8 0 33 1926 0.89<br />

RELIABILITY 0.82 0.00 0.92 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.63 0.09<br />

Average Accuracy = 71.28 %<br />

Average Reliability = 65.04 %<br />

Overall Accuracy = 60.88 %<br />

Table 4. Matrix of land use/land cover for 1994


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Agroforestry<br />

Arable<br />

farmland<br />

Bare<br />

rock<br />

Forest Bare<br />

soils<br />

Settlement Shrub/<br />

fallow<br />

159<br />

Water<br />

body ACCURACY<br />

Agroforestry 1333 0 0 54 0 0 44 0 0.93<br />

Arable<br />

farmland<br />

0 5485 363 0 464 0 1662 44 0.68<br />

Bare rock 0 928 13507 0 34 30 19 1530 0.84<br />

Forest 2244 0 10 11412 0 0 4558 26 0.63<br />

Bare soils 1 5174 41 4 10517 720 6118 124 0.46<br />

Settlement 0 174 22 0 1438 13267 7 632 0.85<br />

Shrub/fallow 1475 504 64 657 1351 0 24127 123 0.85<br />

Water body 0 86 207 0 4 58 0 263 0.43<br />

RELIABILITY 0.26 0.44 0.95 0.94 0.76 0.94 0.66 0.10<br />

Average Accuracy = 70.97 %<br />

Average Reliability = 63.25 %<br />

Overall Accuracy = 72.05 %<br />

Table 5. Matrix of land use/land cover for 2003<br />

5.2 Land use change between 1978 and 2003<br />

The overall results of the study indicate that the area of forestland has been continuously<br />

declined, while the area of shrub/fallow, built-up area (settlements) and waterbody was<br />

proportionally increased (Table 6).<br />

Arae in Percentage<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Source: Author’s Data Analysis<br />

Fig. 7. Land use/land cover change 1978-2003<br />

Forest<br />

Arable<br />

Agro-forestry<br />

Bare soils<br />

Fallow<br />

Bare rock<br />

Water body<br />

Settlement<br />

Land use type<br />

2003<br />

1994<br />

1986<br />

1978


160<br />

Table 6. Land use change between 1978 and 2003<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

5.3 Forest status between 1978 and 2003<br />

The area of forest in the study area was becoming smaller with time (Table 6). In 1978, forest<br />

area was 72,310.93 hectares, which constituted 60.40% of the entire land use. By 1986, the<br />

areal extent had decreased from 72,310.93 to 30,587.80 hectares, a decline of 57.7% within the<br />

period of 9 years. In 1994, there seems to be an increase in the areal extent of the resources.<br />

This is because in 1986, it was 30,587.80 hectares but in 1994 it increased to 36,635.75<br />

hectares. This increase was not an expansion in the coverage but re-growth of the forest<br />

area. In 2003, the forest resources in the study area had almost disappeared when the areal<br />

extent was reduced to 18,841.70 hectares. This represented a decline of 48.57% within the<br />

period of 10 years. From the analysis, a total area of 53,469 hectares of the forest resources<br />

was removed.<br />

The decline in the forest area as discovered in the study confirms the report of FAO (2001)<br />

that tropical forest including Nigeria was on the decline. According to the United Nations<br />

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 93,900 km 2 of forest were cleared per year during<br />

the 1990s, with annual rates of forest loss (positive for all continents with tropical forests):<br />

Africa 0.8%, Asia 0.1%, Oceania 0.2%, North and Central America 0.1%, and South America<br />

0.4% (FAO, 2001). The study also upholds the recognition of Cassel-Gintz, and Petschel-Hels<br />

(2001) that discovered deforestation in their recent study and concluded that it is one of the<br />

core problems of global environmental change. UNDP, UNEP, World Bank and WRI, (2000)<br />

associated extensive deforestation with loss of biodiversity, climate change, watershed<br />

degradation and these pose threat to cultural survival of indigenous population, economic loss<br />

among others. According to the estimates by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO<br />

1983), Nigeria through careless exploitation and husbandry, destroys about 600,000 ha of her<br />

forest every year, as against the reforestation efforts of about 25,000 ha a year, which<br />

replenishes only about 4 percent of the loss. At such rates, Nigeria’s remaining forest area<br />

would disappear by 2020 (Jaiyeoba 2002).The general effect of timber exploitation mostly from<br />

the high forests which cover only about 12.41 million ha of the country’s 91.1 million ha of<br />

land space, (i.e. about 13.5%), is that the forest areas are fast reducing to savanna vegetation.<br />

Consequently, the forest stability is disrupted and its ecosystem has been seriously disturbed.


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

The disturbances are not only in terms of its ability to regenerate through the natural process,<br />

but some species of trees and fauna are being endangered (Okafor 1988).<br />

In recent times, precisely June 1992, the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil more<br />

correctly known as the United Nations Conference on <strong>Environment</strong> and Development<br />

(UNCED) was convened. There was an agreement on a set of "Principles for a global<br />

consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of<br />

forests" and devoted a full chapter of its Agenda 21 to "Combating deforestation". Since this<br />

conference, there has been debate on the phenomenon and conscious efforts are being made<br />

to carefully use and protect natural resources mostly in the developed countries. But there<br />

seems to be limited enthusiasm from developing countries, including Nigeria, where<br />

ineptitude, particularly as regards the implementation of environmental laws, has been the<br />

greatest bane to a sustainable environmental practice (Lines et al.1997; Ibah. 2001). For<br />

instance, between 1995 and 1999 the military junta in Nigeria showed nonchalant attitude to<br />

the sustainability of the forest resources. This gave room to illegal lumbermen to penetrate<br />

the forest in the country, both reserved (protected) and the opened forest (unprotected), as<br />

the case of the study area, thus declined the area of forest nationwide. In poor and<br />

developing countries where often the administrative structures are either too weak and/or<br />

corrupt to enforce rules and regulations effectively and where tax and incentive systems do<br />

not work, forest clearing and environmental degradation has proceeded unabated.<br />

5.4 Arable farmland status from 1978 to 2003<br />

Arable farming is one of the prominent economic activities among the people of the study<br />

area as it is reflected in Table 6. The farmlands occupied 9,441.88 hectares, which<br />

represented 7.89% of the entire land use in 1978. In 1986, the land area of arable farmlands<br />

expanded from 9,441.88 to 11,830.08 hectares, making an increase of 2,388.20 hectares. But<br />

there seems to be a decrease in the cultivated area in 1994. This is due to the period at which<br />

the image was obtained that is, November, the beginning of dry season in southwestern<br />

Nigeria. At this time, most crops had been harvested except few such as, cassava, maize,<br />

among others which are left for proper maturation. Thus, majority of the farmlands are<br />

abandoned till the next planting season and they are sometimes overgrown with shrubs<br />

during this period. Between 1994 and 2003, arable farmlands increased from 6,830.37 to<br />

15,923.20 hectares, representing an increase of 133.13%.<br />

A close assessment of arable farmland areas between 1978 and 2003 shows that, 6,482.32<br />

hectares of the land area was gained. This is negligible if we are going to solve the problem<br />

of food insecurity. However, the expansion of farmlands and declining in the forest area<br />

affirms the claim of Ola-Adams, (1981) and Williams, (1990). In their studies it was<br />

discovered that forests were removed to pave way for food and tree crops. Besides, the<br />

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 2007) asserted that<br />

the overwhelming direct cause of deforestation is agriculture. In their discovery, subsistence<br />

farming was responsible for 48% of deforestation; commercial agriculture 32%; logging 14%<br />

and fuel wood removals make up 5% of deforestation. This was the observation of the study<br />

during the ground truthing. Besides, arable farmlands were scattered all over the study area<br />

especially around the settlements and some newly deforested areas and there were no large<br />

scale mechanized farming in the area. Again, arable farmlands were common features<br />

around the mountainous terrain and crops such as, maize, yam, cassava, rice, among others<br />

were mainly grown in the study area.<br />

161


162<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

5.5 Status of agro-forestry between 1978 and 2003<br />

Agro-forestry, otherwise known as tree crop plantation in the study only constituted 0.47%<br />

that is, 558.76 hectares of the entire land use in 1978 (Table 6). The improved spatial<br />

resolution of the image data (SPOT 1986 and 1994) however, brought a significant difference<br />

to what was recorded in Landsat MSS 1978. Also, variation in the period at which the image<br />

data were taken influenced the differences in the pixel statistics of the two images. It should<br />

be recalled that while SPOT XS 1986 was obtained in May, the beginning of rainy season in<br />

southwestern Nigeria, SPOT XS 1994 was acquired in November, the beginning of dry<br />

season in the area. In May, tree canopies are just springing up due to the long periods of<br />

dryness. On the other hand, the tree canopies are still fresh in November despite the<br />

inception of the dry period. This difference in the time period is capable of influencing the<br />

canopy characteristics of the farmlands, consequently affecting the result. The estimated<br />

area of agro-forestry in 2003 was 4,774.30 hectares, which represented an increase of<br />

342.03%. Although agro-forestry is not commonly found in the study area due to poor<br />

topography in some areas, the tree crop plantations are well grown in some areas around<br />

Ilesa, Erin-Oke, Aramoko-Ekiti (Figure 2). Because of the economic value of the crops, many<br />

deforested areas have been replaced with the cocoa plantations in particular, which<br />

confirms the findings of Ola-Adams, (1981) and Williams, (1990).<br />

Although research in agro-forestry especially in Africa, has paid a significant quantum of<br />

emphasis on this concept for about three decades, it again is adaptation of earlier system of<br />

slash and burn and perennial forest gardens, although on a more scientific basis. The<br />

benefits of incorporating trees, especially fast growing legume species, lies in increasing soil<br />

fertility, obtaining complimentarity in resource use, reducing environmental stress and<br />

protecting crops.<br />

5.6 Bare rock status from 1978 to 2003<br />

The pixel statistics in Table 6 shows that the underlying rocks were being exposed in the<br />

study area. For instance, the area occupied by the exposed rock was 7,340.62 hectares in<br />

1978, which was 6.13% of the total land use. The proportional decreased in 1986 was due to<br />

the prevailing season that is, wet season. During this period, the whole landscape was<br />

covered with vegetation making it difficult for rock to be seen as rock. This constraint in<br />

effect influenced the recorded areal extent of 2,246.29 hectares, which represented a decrease<br />

of 69.40%. In 1994, the area occupied by rock increased to 12,979.33 hectares, because of the<br />

prevailing season that is, dry season. At this time, the vegetation had dried up thus, making<br />

exposed rocks visible for classification. The year 2003 showed a decrease of 43.89% in the<br />

area of bare rocks. This could be because of the prevailing season at the time the image was<br />

acquired that is, September, the peak period of raining season in southwestern Nigeria. It is<br />

instructive to note that the rocks of the study area show great variation in grain size and in<br />

mineral composition, which enhanced the growth of dense vegetation whenever there is<br />

enough moisture. During the field survey, some quarry sites were sighted, which could in<br />

effect lead to the reduction in the size of the bare rocks in the study area.<br />

5.7 Status of bare soils from 1978 to 2003<br />

There are continuous exposure of soils to intense solar radiation and direct precipitation in<br />

the study area. This is shown by the expansion of bare soils discovered in the study. For<br />

example, in 1978, the area occupied by bare soils was 2,213.28 hectares representing 1.85% of


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

the entire land use area. This increased to 9,347.52 hectares in 1986, representing 322.30%<br />

increase over the period of 9 years (1978 - 1986). The bare soils decreased by 53.48% in 1994<br />

and expanded by 33.73% in the year 2003. Between 1978 and 2003, the estimated area of bare<br />

soils expanded from 2213.3 hectares to 5814.9 hectares, which put an increase at 3601.6<br />

hectares (Table 6).<br />

Although the prevailing season partly influenced the trend, it was obvious some land areas<br />

were void of vegetation in the study area. Continuous exposure of soils could pose serious<br />

problem to agricultural sector and consequently continuous food insecurity. This is because<br />

clearing of forest lands contribute to severe soil erosion, soil infertility and flooding. The<br />

multiplier effect on the economy could be severe if quick action is not taken. In the first place,<br />

soil erosion would reduce agricultural land area, which in effect could induce food shortages<br />

and out-migration of the able-body from the rural community to the urban environment. This<br />

claim is already manifesting in most rural communities in Nigeria including the study area.<br />

Arokoyu (1999) reported that “environmental devastation has led to the loss of the means of<br />

livelihood of people, fall in agricultural outputs, out-migration of able-bodied youths, and<br />

engendered social rifts and intensified confusion. Presently, a community in the study area<br />

(Efon-Alaaye) has already been devastated by soil erosion and government had sunk millions<br />

of Naira to redeem the community from being swept away by erosion. This situation is<br />

capable of discouraging the able-bodied youths from the community and induces migration to<br />

urban centres, thereby increasing urbanization process.<br />

5.8 Water body status from 1978 to 2003<br />

The drainage basin area in 1978 was 1.39 km 2. This increased to 57.83 km 2 in 1986, which<br />

was equivalent to 4060.43% increase. This increment was dictated by the improved spatial<br />

resolution of SPOT XS 1986, which is 20m as against 80m spatial resolution of Landsat MSS<br />

1978. In SPOT XS 1986, streams, rivers, ponds and dams were more clearly visible, which<br />

enhanced the area calculation. In 1994, the drainage basin area calculated reduced by<br />

20.15%, which consequently put the total area at 46.18 km 2. The reason for this can be traced<br />

to the prevailing season. At the time the image data was obtained, the rain had just ended in<br />

southwestern Nigeria and the tree canopy was still fresh and dense. Most streams and rivers<br />

were covered with riparian forest thus, making it difficult for rivers to be assigned to class<br />

ID for eventual classification. In 2003, the area of water body was 46.09 km 2, which was still<br />

a reduction in the coverage of water body. The reason for this is connected to the prevailing<br />

season that is, wet season and some noises in the image data, which in effect reduced its<br />

optimum visual systems. The pixel statistical result of water body in the study does not<br />

reflect the situation on ground and does not support the present claim of climate change.<br />

High spatial resolution images is therefore, recommended for study on hydrology.<br />

5.9 Status of fallow/shrub from 1978 to 2003<br />

Bush fallow is a periodic relocation of farmland for the purpose of allowing soil to regain its<br />

fertility. Table 6 shows that the area of fallow has been increasing over the years, the highest<br />

being recorded between 1994 and 2003. For example, between 1978 and 1986, the fallow area<br />

increased from 23,397.9 hectares to 35,330.3 hectares, which puts the percentage change<br />

within the period of 8 years at 51%. This therefore implies that per year, the land areas that<br />

were left to fallow in the study area were 1,492 hectares. The spatial coverage, however,<br />

decreased from 35,330.3 hectares in 1986 to 26,804.2 hectares in 1994, which put decline at<br />

163


164<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

24.13%. This indicated that 8,526.1 hectares of fallow lands were used up within the period<br />

of 9 years. But between 1994 and 2003, the trend changed as fallow area increased from<br />

26,804.2 hectares in 1994 to 59,436.8 hectares in 2003. This shifted the percentage change over<br />

the period of 9 years from 24.13 to 121.74.<br />

The increase in the areal extent of shrub/fallow and a decrease in the forest area suggested<br />

that part of the deforested areas were abandoned to secondary re-growth. According to<br />

Aweto (1990), in Nigeria, the area previously characterized by continuous forest cover has<br />

been converted into secondary re-growth vegetation, mainly as a result of shifting<br />

cultivation and lumbering. In study area, some deforested areas were left uncultivated<br />

thereby converted to secondary re-growth while some farmlands were left to fallow thus,<br />

created a large expanse of fallow lands in the area.<br />

5.10 Built-up area status from 1978 to 2003<br />

The development of settlements in the study area has been rather gradual. This is because<br />

the study area comprises of many rural settlements and few urban centres and why major<br />

development takes place in the urban settlements, little or no development takes place in the<br />

rural settlements. This accounted for the proportion of 943.39 hectares in 1978. Although<br />

there was an increase in the areal extent in 1986, it only amounted to an increase of 66.17%<br />

over the period of 8 years. Settlements also expanded in their areal extent between 1986 and<br />

1994, (i.e. 1567.6 to 1,947.9 hectares). This shows that within those periods, all the<br />

settlements expanded by 380.3 hectares, which constituted 24.26% increase. Between 1994<br />

and 2003, settlements expanded by 142 hectares, which makes the total area covered by<br />

settlements to increase from 1,947.9 hectares, to 2,089.6 hectares. This shows that annually,<br />

between 1994 and 2003, 15.78 hectares of lands were gained for settlements, which<br />

represented 7.29% growth between 1994 and 2003.<br />

The expansion of settlements, due to increased in human population and decrease in forest<br />

area shows that forests were been destroyed in the study area to pave way for human<br />

habitation. This confirms the findings of the Mather, (1990) and Harcourt, (1992) that<br />

reported an inverse relationship between population and forest cover. Geist and Lambin,<br />

(2002) also revealed that population increases due to high fertility rates were a primary<br />

driver of tropical deforestation in only 8% of cases.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

The study, through the capability of GIS technology and remote sensing data revealed a<br />

steady decline in forest area and land use intensification with the expansion in farmlands,<br />

fallow ground and built up/residential areas. This indicates that forests were being<br />

converted to agricultural use and housing estate. However, the disappearance of forest<br />

resources could pose serious threat to biodiversity. For instance, there has been an underlying<br />

assumption that as the forest declines, species diversity will decline similarly. Many such<br />

models have been proven to be wrong and loss of habitat does not necessarily lead to large<br />

scale loss of species. Study that will give more insight on the process of biodiversity extinction<br />

resulted from deforestation will be needed since the scientific understanding of the process of<br />

extinction is insufficient to accurately make predictions about the impact of deforestation on<br />

biodiversity. Moreover, it should be borne in mind that forest resources preserve ecosystem,<br />

offers economic and social opportunity for people. Besides, forests foster medicinal


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

conservation. There is therefore need to protect our forest since unprotected forest will<br />

disappear faster than the protected one. Demarcating some forest zones as forest reserve areas<br />

could do this. Also, the indigenous participation and the involvement of the community<br />

people together with the forest guards in forest monitoring will go a long way to salvaging our<br />

forest from total depletion. The approach of GIS in this study was found useful as adequate<br />

tool for regular and up-to-date monitoring of forest and earth resources.<br />

7. Acknowledgements<br />

The impetus received from Prof. Bola Ayeni (Department of Geography, University of<br />

Ibadan, Nigeria) and Prof. F. A. Adesina (Department of Geography, Obafemi Awolowo<br />

University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria) in contributing a chapter to this book was appreciated. The<br />

authors valued the cooperation of the staff of RECTAS, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-<br />

Ife; NASRDA, Abuja and GIS unit of the Department of Geography where the satellite<br />

images used for this study were collected. Finally, the privilege offered the authors by the<br />

CEO of INTECH open access publisher to contribute a chapter to this book was treasured.<br />

8. Definition of terms<br />

Deforestation:<br />

Deforestation is the removal of a forest or stand of trees where the land is thereafter<br />

converted to a non-forest use. Examples of deforestation include conversion of forestland to<br />

farms, ranches, or urban use. Deforestation occurs for many reasons: trees or derived<br />

charcoal are used as, or sold, for fuel or as timber, while cleared land is used as pasture for<br />

livestock, plantations of commodities, and settlements.<br />

Land use:<br />

Land use is characterized by the arrangement, activities and inputs people undertake in a<br />

certain land cover type to produce change or maintain it (FAO, 2005). Land use is the<br />

specific activity a piece of land is put into. Various land use patterns emerge after the land<br />

has been subjected to use over time. In the rural area for instance, the type of land use<br />

include farming, plantation, grazing, etc.<br />

Land cover:<br />

The definition of land cover is fundamental, because in many existing classifications and<br />

legends, it is confused with land use. Land cover is the observed (bio) physical cover on the<br />

earth’s surface (FAO, 2005).<br />

Biodiversity:<br />

Biological diversity or biodiversity means the variety of plant and animal life at the<br />

ecosystem, community or species level and even at the generic level, Biodiversity is most<br />

commonly measured and reported at species level with characteristics such as species riches<br />

(number of species), species diversity (types of species) and endemism (uniqueness of<br />

species to a certain area) being the most useful elements for comparison (UNEP, 2002).<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al degradation:<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al degradation can be defined as any modification of the environment that<br />

implies a reduction or loss of its physical and biological quantities caused by natural<br />

165


166<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

phenomena or human activities ultimately representing a decrease in the availability of<br />

ecosystem, good and services to human populations (Landa et al., 1997).<br />

Spatial & spectral resolution:<br />

The spatial resolution refers to the size of the area on the ground that is summarized by one<br />

data value in the imagery. This is the Instantaneous Field of View (IFOV). Spectral<br />

resolution refers to the number and width of the spectral bands that the satellite sensor<br />

detects (Eastman, 2001).<br />

9. References<br />

Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T. and Malingreau, J. P.<br />

(2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests,<br />

Science 297: 999-1002.<br />

Adesina, F.A. (1997). Vegetation Degradation and <strong>Environment</strong>al Changes in the Tropics, Ife<br />

Research Publications in Geography 6: (1 & 2), 68-78.<br />

Aina, T.D. and Salau, A. T. (1992). The Challenge of Sustainable Development in Nigeria, Ibadan,<br />

Nigerian <strong>Environment</strong>al Study/Action Team, (NEST).<br />

Angelsen, A., and Kaimowitz, D. (1999). "Rethinking the Causes of Deforestation: Lessons<br />

from Economic Models", The World Bank Research Observer, 14:1, Oxford University<br />

Press, pp. 73–98. http://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbrobs/v14y1999i1p73-98.html.<br />

Areola, O. (1994): Geography Sense and National Development, The Nigerian Geographical<br />

Journal, New series 1: 20-35.<br />

Arokoyu, S.B. (1999). “<strong>Environment</strong>al Degradation, Resource Alienation and Peasant<br />

Activities: A case study of Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria”,<br />

Abstracts of Papers Presented at the 42 nd Annual Conference of the Nigerian<br />

Geographical Association, Held at Ogun State University, Ago- Iwoye, Nigeria<br />

May 16-20 th, In: Onakomaiya S.O and K.T. Gbadamosi (eds.) Geographical<br />

Perspectives on Nigerian Development in the Next Millennium, 88-89.<br />

Aweto, A.O. (1990). "Plantation forestry and forest conservation in Nigeria." The<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>alist. 10:127-34, Summer.<br />

Ayeni, Bola (2001). Application of GIS; A paper presented at the 44 th Annual Conference of<br />

Nigerian Geographical Association, at University of Ibadan, July.<br />

Boroffice, R.A. (2006). Press Conference Address at International Stakeholders’ Workshop<br />

on Geo-Information System-Based forest monitoring in Nigeria (GEOFORMIN).<br />

March 27-30, 2006 at NUC Auditorium, Maitama, Abuja.<br />

Burgonio, T. J. (2008). "Corruption Blamed for Deforestation", Philippine Daily Inquirer,<br />

January 3,<br />

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=1<br />

10193.<br />

Butler, R. A. (2009). "Impact of Population and Poverty on Rainforests", Mongabay.com / A<br />

Place Out of Time: Tropical Rainforests and the Perils They Face.<br />

http://rainforests.mongabay.com/0816.htm. Retrieved May 13, 2009.<br />

Butler, R. A. (2009)."Human Threats to Rainforests—Economic Restructuring".<br />

Mongabay.com / A Place Out of Time: Tropical Rainforests and the Perils They Face.<br />

http://rainforests.mongabay.com/0805.htm. Retrieved May 13, 2009.<br />

Butler, R. A. and Laurance, W. F. (2008). "New Strategies for Conserving Tropical<br />

Forests",Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 469–472.


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Cassel-Gintz, M., and Petschel-Hels, G. (2001). GIS-Based Assessment of the Threat to World<br />

Forests by Patterns of no Sustainable Civilization Nature Interaction, Journal of<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Management 59:279–298.<br />

Defries, R. (2007). "Earth Observations for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from<br />

Deforestation in Developing Countries", <strong>Environment</strong>al Science and Policy, 06/02/07.<br />

Diaz, M.C., M. del C. V., D. Nepstad, M. J. C. Mendonça, R. M. Seroa, A. A. Alencar, J. C.<br />

Gomes, R. A. Ortiz (2002). Prejuízo oculto do fogo: custos econômicos das<br />

queimadas e incêndios florestais da Amazônia. Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da<br />

Amazônia e Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Belém, Brazil. Disponível<br />

em: http://www.ipam.org.br. Cited in Moutinho P. and Schwartzman S. 2005.<br />

Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change, Amazon Institute for <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Research, Brazil, p. 111.<br />

Eastman J. R. (2001). IDRISI Guide to GIS and Image Processing Vol. 1, Worcester M. A., USA,<br />

Clark Labs, Clark University. P.17-34.<br />

Fearnside, P. M. and Laurance, W. F. (2004). Tropical Deforestation and Greenhouse-Gas<br />

Emissions, Ecological Applications, Volume 14, Issue 4 (August 2004), pp. 982–986.<br />

Federal <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection Agency, Nigeria (1992). "Achieving Sustainable<br />

Development in Nigeria" National Report for the United Nations Conference on<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> and Development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. pp. 1-12<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1983). Forest Product Prices, No. 46. 1963-1982,<br />

FAO of the United Nations, Rome.<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1988). An Interim Report on the State of Forest<br />

Resources in the Developing Countries, Forest Resources Division, Forestry<br />

Department, FAO of the United Nations, Rome.<br />

FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. Global Forest Resources Assessment. 2000.<br />

Summary Report. Food and Agriculture Organization website<br />

http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/index.jsp.<br />

FAO. (2001). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 main report. FAO Forestry Paper No.<br />

140. Rome (www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/main/index.jsp).<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1997). Africover Landcover Classification. Rome.<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), (2001a). “Forest Resources Assessment 2000” FAO,<br />

Rome.<br />

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), (2005). Land Cover Classification System,<br />

Classification Concepts and User Manual, <strong>Environment</strong> and Natural Resources Series<br />

8, FAO, Rome, p. 3<br />

Forest Monitoring for Action (FORMA, 2009): Center for Global Development: Initiatives:<br />

Active, Cgdev.org (2009-11-23). Retrieved on 2010-08-29.<br />

Geist, H. J. and Lambin, E. F. (2002). "Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of<br />

Tropical Deforestation", BioScience, Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 143–150.<br />

http://www.freenetwork.org/resources/documents/2-5Deforestationtropical.pdf.<br />

GEO FCT <strong>Portal</strong>, (2010). http://www.portal.geo-fct.org. Retrieved on 2010-08-29.<br />

Global Deforestation, (2006). Global Change Curriculum, University of Michigan Global<br />

Change Program, January 4, 2006.<br />

Harcourt, C. (1992). Tropical Moist Forests. In: Groombridge, B. (ed.), World Conservation<br />

Monitoring Centre, London: Chapman and Hall.<br />

Hecht, S. B., Kandel, S., Gomes, I., Cuellar, N. and Rosa, H. (2006). "Globalization, Forest<br />

Resurgence, and <strong>Environment</strong>al Politics in El Salvador", World Development Vol. 34,<br />

No. 2. pp. 308–323. http://www.spa.ucla.edu/cgpr/docs/sdarticle1.pdf.<br />

167


168<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Houghton R A. (2003). Revised Estimates of the Annual net Flux of Carbon to the<br />

Atmosphere from Changes in Land use and Land Management 1850-2000. Tellus,<br />

55 : 378-390.<br />

Ibah, L. (2001). “The Nigerian <strong>Environment</strong> Score Sheet” The Punch, Thursday, January 11,<br />

p.29<br />

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group I Report, "The Physical Science Basis",<br />

Section 7.3.3.1.5 (p. 527).<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter7.pdf<br />

IPCC, (2000). Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />

Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Jaiyeoba, I. A. (2002). ‘‘<strong>Environment</strong>’’, Africa Atlases: Atlas of Nigeria, Paris: Les Edition, JA,<br />

pp. 122–123.<br />

Jensen, J. R. (1996). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. United<br />

State of America: Prentice- Hall, Inc., P.197.<br />

Karen, (2003). "Demographics, Democracy, Development, Disparity and Deforestation: A<br />

Crossnational Assessment of the Social Causes of Deforestation". Paper presented at<br />

the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta Hilton Hotel,<br />

Atlanta, GA, Aug 16, 2003.<br />

http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/0/7/4/8/p1<br />

07488_index.html. Retrieved May 13, 2009.<br />

Landa, R., Meave, J. and Carabias, J. (1997). <strong>Environment</strong>al Deterioration in Rural Mexico:<br />

An Examination of the Concept”, Ecological Applications 7(1): 316 – 329.<br />

Laurance, W. F. (1999). "Reflections on the Tropical Deforestation Crisis", Biological<br />

Conservation, Volume 91, Issues 2-3. pp. 109–117.<br />

http://studentresearch.wcp.muohio.edu/BiogeogDiversityDisturbance/Reflection<br />

sDeforestCrisis.pdf.<br />

Le Quéré, C. and Scholes, R. J. (2001). The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,<br />

Pages 183-237, in: Houghton, J. T. Ding, Y. Griggs, D. J. Noguer, M. van der Linden,<br />

P. J., Dai, X. Maskell, K.and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001:Tthe<br />

Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report<br />

of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,<br />

Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />

Leakey, R. and Roger L. (1996). The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of<br />

Humankind, Anchor, ISBN 0-385-46809-1.<br />

Lines, C., Bolwell, L and Norman, M. (1997). Geography – Study Guide GCSE, London: Letts<br />

Educational, pp. 152 –153.<br />

Marcoux, A. (2000). "Population and Deforestation", SD Dimensions, Sustainable<br />

Development Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United<br />

Nations (FAO), August 2000. http://www.fao.org/sd/WPdirect/WPan0050.htm.<br />

Mather, A.S. (1990). Global Forest Resources. London: Elhaven Press,<br />

Mayaux, P. and Malingreau, J. P. (1996). Central Africa Forest Cover Revisited: An Iterative<br />

Approach Based on a Multi-satellite Analysis, Submitted to Ambio, July.<br />

Meyers, W.B. and Turner, B.L. II, (1992). “Human Population Growth and Global Land<br />

use/Land cover Change”, in: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, No. 23, pp.<br />

39-61.<br />

Mitchell, B. (1989). Geography and Resource Analysis. U.K: Longman Group Ltd., Longman<br />

Scientific and Technical.


Geospatial Analysis of Deforestation<br />

and Land Use Dynamics in a Region of Southwestern Nigeria<br />

Moutinho P. and Schwartzman S. (2005). Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change,<br />

Amazon Institute for <strong>Environment</strong>al Research, Brazil.<br />

Munro, D.A. et al. (1986). Learning from Experience: A state of the Art Review and<br />

Evaluation of <strong>Environment</strong>al Impact Assessment. Canada: Audits Supply and<br />

Services, Ottawa;<br />

Ogunsanya, A. A. (2000). Contemporary issues in <strong>Environment</strong>al Studies, Ilorin: Haytee Press &<br />

Publishing Co. Ltd. III.<br />

Okafor, F. C. (1988). Rural Development and the <strong>Environment</strong> Degradation versus<br />

Protection. In P. O. Sada & F. O. Odemerho (Eds.), <strong>Environment</strong>al issues in<br />

Nigerian Development. Ibadan, Nigeria: Evans Brothers.<br />

Ola-Adams, B.A. (1981). Strategies for Conversation and Utilization of Forest Genetic<br />

Resources in Nigeria, The Nigeria Journal of Forestry Vol.11 (2): pp. 32-39.<br />

Olofin E. A. (2000). Geography and <strong>Environment</strong>al Monitoring for Effective Resource<br />

Management, The Nigerian Geographical Journal, New series Vol. 3 & 4: 5 – 8.<br />

Olokesusi, F. (1992). <strong>Environment</strong> Impact Assessment in Nigeria: Current Situation and<br />

Future Directions for Future, Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Management. 35: 163-171.<br />

Osemeobo, G. J. (1990). "Land use Policies and Biotic Conservation: Problems and Prospects<br />

for Forestry Development in Nigeria." Land Use Policy. 7:314-22. Oct<br />

Osemeobo, G. J. (1991). "A Financial Analysis of Forest Land use in Bendel, Nigeria” Forest<br />

Ecology and Management, vol. 40, May 31.<br />

Pimm, S. L, Russell, G. J, Gittleman, J. L, Brooks, T. M. (1995). "The future of biodiversity",<br />

Science 269 (5222): 347–341. doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347. PMID 17841251.<br />

Poor, D. (1976). Ecological Guidelines for Development in Tropical Rain Forests, IUCN, Morges<br />

Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G., Fashm, M., Goulden, M., Heimann, M., Jaramillo, V., Kheshgi, H.,<br />

Le Quéré, C. and Scholes, R. J. (2001). The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon<br />

Dioxide, Pages 183-237, in: Houghton, J. T. Ding, Y. Griggs, D. J. Noguer, M. van der<br />

Linden, P. J., Dai, X. Maskell, K.and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001:Tthe<br />

Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of<br />

the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,<br />

Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />

Rainforest Facts, (2010). http://www.rain-tree.com/facts.htm (2010-03-20). Retrieved on<br />

2010-08-29.<br />

Reed, D. (1996). Sustainable Development, In: Reed, D. (ed.) Structural Adjustment, The<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>, and Sustainable Development. London, Earthscan Publication Ltd, pp.<br />

25-44.<br />

Rees, W.E. (1990). The Ecology of Sustainable Development, The Ecology, vol. 20: 18-23.<br />

Rodgers, A., Salehe, J., and Olson, J. (2000). Woodland and Tree Resources on Public Land,<br />

In: Temu, A.B., Lund, G., Malimbwi, R. E., Kowero, G.S., Klein, K., Malende, Y. and<br />

Kone, I. (eds.), Off-forest Tree Resources of Africa, A Proceedings of a workshop held at<br />

Arusha, Tanzania, 1999, The African Academy of Sciences (AAS).<br />

Rowe, R.N., Sharma, N.P. and Browder, J. (1992). Deforestation: Problems, Causes and<br />

Concerns. In: Sharma, N.P. (ed.), Managing the World’s Forests: Looking for<br />

Balance Between Conservation and Development. IOWA, Kendall/Hunt<br />

Publishing Co. 33-45.<br />

Rudel, T. K. (2005). "Tropical Forests: Regional Paths of Destruction and Regeneration in the<br />

Late 20th Century", Columbia University Press, ISBN 023113195X.<br />

Sahney, S., Benton, M. J. and Falcon-Lang, H. J. (2010). "Rainforest Collapse Triggered<br />

Pennsylvanian Tetrapod Diversification in Euramerica", Geology 38 (12): 1079–1082.<br />

169


170<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

doi:10.1130/G31182.1.<br />

http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/12/1079.<br />

Sharma, N.P., Rowe, R., Openshaw, K., and Jacobson, M. (1992). “World Forests in<br />

Perspective”. In: Sharma, N.P. (ed.), Managing the World’s Forests: Looking for<br />

Balance Between Conservation and Development. IOWA, Kendall/Hunt<br />

Publishing Co. pp. 17-26.<br />

Smith, L. G. (1993). Impact Assessment and Sustainable Resource Management, United Kingdom:<br />

Longman Group Ltd.<br />

Stock, J. and Rochen, A. (2009). "The Choice: Doomsday or Arbor Day".<br />

http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/society/deforestation.htm. Retrieved May 13, 2009.<br />

Taylor, D. M., Hortin D., Parnwell M. J. G. and Marsden T. K. (1994). The Degradation of<br />

Rainforests in Sarawak, East Malaysia, and its Implications for Future Management<br />

Policies, Geoforum. 25 (3): 351 –369.<br />

http://news.mongabay.com/Butler_and_Laurance-TREE.pdf.<br />

UNEP, (2002). Africa <strong>Environment</strong> Outlook Past, Present and Future Perspectives, Earthprint<br />

Ltd., England. 130.<br />

UNEP, UNEP, World Bank, & WRI. (2000). World resources 2000–2001: People and<br />

Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life. Washington D.C: World Resources Institute.<br />

UNFCC, (2009). "Copenhagen Accord of 18 December 2009".<br />

http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/application/pdf/cop15_cph_auv.pdf.<br />

Retrieved 2009-12-28<br />

UNFCC , (2009). "Methodological Guidance".<br />

http://unfccc.int/files/na/application/pdf/cop15_ddc_auv.pdf. Retrieved 2009-<br />

12-28.<br />

UNFCCC (2007). "Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change", UNFCCC<br />

Int. UNFCCC. p. 81.<br />

ttp://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/a<br />

pplication/pdf/pub_07_financial_flows.pdf.<br />

Van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Olivier, J. G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jackson,<br />

R. B., Collatz, G. J. and Randerson, J. T. (2009). "CO2 Emissions from Forest Loss",<br />

Nature Geoscience 2 (11): 737–738. doi:10.1038/ngeo671.<br />

Verolme, H.J.H. and Moussa, J. (1999). Addressing the Underlying Causes of Deforestation<br />

and Forest Degradation- Case Studies, Analysis and Policy Recommendations,<br />

Biodiversity Action Network, Washington, D.C.<br />

Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. and Alvarado, L. X. R. (2007). Bringing 'REDD' into a New Deal for<br />

the Global Climate, Analyses, no. 2, 2007, Institute for Sustainable Development and<br />

International Relations.<br />

Williams, M. (1990). Forests, In: Turner B.L., Clark, W.C., Kates, R.W., Richard, J.F.,<br />

Matthews, J.T. and Meyers, W.B. (eds.), The Earth as Transformed by Human Action,<br />

Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 years. Cambridge<br />

University Press, Cambridge, pp.179-201.<br />

World Bank, (1992). Annual Report 1992, Washington, D. C., World Bank.<br />

World Rainforest Movement (WRM, 2003). WRM Bulletin Number 74, September 2003,<br />

http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/74/Uganda.html.<br />

World Resources Institute, (1987). World Resources 1987, New York, Basic Books.<br />

YaleGlobal, (2007). "The Double Edge of Globalization", YaleGlobal Online, Yale University<br />

Press June 2007. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=9366.


Unsupervised Classification<br />

of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method<br />

1. Introduction<br />

9<br />

Antonia Macedo-Cruz1, I. Villegas-Romero3, M. Santos-Peñas2 and G. Pajares-Martinsanz2 1Hidrociencias, Campus Montecillo,<br />

Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Estado de México,<br />

2Facultad de Informática, Universidad Complutense de Madrid,<br />

3Universidad Autónoma Chapingo,<br />

1,3México 2España Remote-sensing research focusing on image classification has long attracted the attention of<br />

the remote-sensing community because classification results are the basis for many<br />

environmental and socioeconomic applications. However, classifying remotely sensed data<br />

into a thematic map remains a challenge because many factors, such as the complexity of the<br />

landscape in a study area, selected remotely sensed data, and image-processing and<br />

classification approaches, may affect the success of a classification [1].<br />

In forest management, a number of activities are oriented towards wood production or<br />

forest inventories with the aims of controlling parameters of interest such as diameter of<br />

trees, height, crown height, bark thickness, canopy, humidity, illumination, CO2<br />

transformation among others, always with the goal of environmental sustainability with<br />

high social impact. The unsupervised classification of aerial image offer solutions for<br />

monitoring production in forest trees while the same time costs are minimized. Also with<br />

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) equipped with an appropriate image classification<br />

system, have become powerful tools for early fire forest detection and posterior monitoring.<br />

This technology has also been applied for crop monitoring under wireless sensor network<br />

architecture.<br />

Clustering is the task of categorizing objects having several attributes into different classes<br />

so that the objects belonging to the same class are similar, and those that are broken down<br />

into different classes are not. Clustering is the subject of active research in several fields such<br />

as statistics, pattern recognition, machine learning, data mining, information science,<br />

agriculture technology and spatial databases. A wide variety of clustering algorithms have<br />

been proposed for different applications [1], [2].<br />

Classification and segmentation in agriculture and forest management is an interesting<br />

topic but not new. There are many classification approaches that are oriented toward the<br />

identification of textures in agricultural and forest images. Most of them can be grouped<br />

as follows.


172<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Currently, many of the agriculture, livestock and forestry are planned using spatial<br />

analysis tools, seeking different specific objectives [3]. In this sense, the images acquired<br />

by remote sensors provide the necessary spatial resolution to obtain information about<br />

objects, areas, or phenomena on the earth’s surface, at different scales. These sensors<br />

measure the intensity of the energy emitted or reflected by the objects by means of the<br />

electromagnetic spectrum [1].<br />

There are many segmentation techniques reported in the literature [4, 5]. Most color<br />

image segmentation techniques are usually derived from methods designed for<br />

graylevel images. Processing each channel individually by directly applying graylevel<br />

where the channels are assumed independent and only their intra-spatial interactions<br />

are considered [6]. Another option is decomposing the image into luminance and<br />

chromatic channel: after transforming the image data into the desired (usually<br />

application dependent) color space, texture features are extracted from the luminance<br />

channel while chromatic features are extracted from the chromatic channels, each in a<br />

specific manner [7]. Reference [8] and [9] show combining spatial interaction within<br />

each channel and interaction between spectral channels and gray level texture analysis<br />

techniques are applied in each channel, while pixel interactions between different<br />

channels are also taken into account.<br />

Based on the presented considerations and in order to tackle the classification problem<br />

addressed in this paper, we have designed a new automatic strategy based on the<br />

thresholding Otsu´s method is proposed. The first step consists in the thresholding of each<br />

R, G and B channels into two parts based on within-class and between-class variances<br />

suggested by Otsu [10]. This allows to classify each pixel to one part of each channel, so that<br />

conveniently combined the a pixel should be classified as belonging to one of the eight<br />

possible classes. Although in this paper we only use eight classes, the method can be easily<br />

extended to more classes, as described in section 2.2.2, even we can achieve until twenty<br />

seven. This makes the main contribution of this paper.<br />

Additionally, one major advantage of this algorithm is that it does not need to know how<br />

many classes are required to be clustered in advance, as it is required for most supervised<br />

clustering processes. The termination criterion is established based on the within-class<br />

variance, according to the Otsu’s method.<br />

The proposed method is compared against the well-known Fuzzy c-means clustering [11], [12].<br />

The prediction of the correct number of clusters is a fundamental problem in unsupervised<br />

classification problems. Many clustering algorithms require the definition of the number of<br />

clusters beforehand. To overcome this problem, various cluster validity indices have been<br />

proposed to assess the quality of a clustering partition [13]-[16]. Five cluster validation<br />

indices have been used in our tests, they are: Dunn’s [15]-[19], Davies-Bouldin [15], [19]-[21],<br />

Calinski-Harabasz [15], [21]-[24], Krzanowski and Lai [22], [25]; and Hartigan [21], [22], [26].<br />

We have used five because there is not relevant conclusions in the literature about their<br />

performance, depending on the application their behavior could vary considerably. Based<br />

on the above indices we have verified the best performance of our approach against the MS<br />

method, particularly in the images where water bodies are present.<br />

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, materials and methods; two<br />

issues will be addressed, unsupervised classification of color images and five of cluster<br />

validation indexes. Section 3, result and discussions; Conclusions are presented in Section 4.


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 173<br />

2. Materials and methods<br />

2.1 Study area<br />

In the present investigation 16 color aerial photographs in digital format were used, owned<br />

by the Institute of Geography of the Autonomous University of Mexico, taken in October<br />

1997. The photographs correspond to the catchments of the river La Sabana, Guerrero, with<br />

spatial resolution of 1:19500, and three-band spectral resolution visible and radiometric<br />

resolution RGB from 0 to 255 levels. As an example, Fig. 1 displays a representative image of<br />

the set of images analyzed in this work. As we can see it contains several textures which<br />

must be classified as belonging to a cluster.<br />

Fig. 1. Land cover images in RGB color model<br />

2.2 Classifier based on the theory of the Otsu’s method<br />

2.2.1 Brief description of the Otsu’s method<br />

Otsu’s method [10], one of the most widely used thresholding techniques in image analysis,<br />

has showed great success in image enhancement and segmentation. As mentioned before, it<br />

is an automatic thresholding strategy; we exploit the automatic capability for designing the<br />

unsupervised classification strategy justifying its choice.<br />

This research sought the optimal threshold (single or multiple) for each of the spectral bands<br />

of the color image by applying the algorithm modified [27, 28]:<br />

The number of pixels with gray level i is denoted f i giving a probability of gray level i in an<br />

image of<br />

f<br />

i pi N<br />

Then, the probability distributions for each class is<br />

(1)


174<br />

w<br />

k<br />

pi<br />

iC k<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The k w is regarded as the zeroth-order cumulative moment of the kth class Ck. and the<br />

means for classes is<br />

i. pi<br />

uk<br />

(3)<br />

w<br />

iCk In the case of bi-level thresholding, Otsu defined the between-class variance of the<br />

thresholded image as:<br />

Where<br />

And<br />

k<br />

2* ( ) 2 ( ) 2<br />

B<br />

w 1<br />

u<br />

1<br />

u T<br />

w 2<br />

u<br />

2<br />

u<br />

T<br />

(4)<br />

M<br />

<br />

T<br />

<br />

k<br />

<br />

k<br />

k1<br />

M<br />

wk 1<br />

(6)<br />

k1<br />

Assuming that there are M-1 thresholds, {t1, t2, …, tM-1}, which divide the original image<br />

into M classes: C1 for [1,…, t1], C2 for [t1+1, …, t2], … , Ci for [t i-1+1, …, t i], …, and CM for<br />

2<br />

[tM-1+1, …, L], the optimal thresholds {t1*, t2*, …, tM-1*} are chosen by maximizing B as<br />

follows<br />

then<br />

{ t *, *,..., *} arg { 2<br />

1<br />

t<br />

2<br />

t<br />

M1 Max <br />

B<br />

( t<br />

1<br />

, t<br />

2<br />

,..., t<br />

M1<br />

)}<br />

1 t<br />

1<br />

... t M1<br />

L<br />

2 M<br />

( )<br />

2 2 M<br />

2<br />

B<br />

wu<br />

k k<br />

u T<br />

wu<br />

(8)<br />

k k<br />

k1 k1<br />

A threshold value tOtsu developed by Otsu is the one that maximizes vart between-class, or<br />

equivalently minimizes vart within-class.<br />

Min1 t<br />

Var <br />

1<br />

t<br />

<br />

tOtsu t L withinclass arg ( )<br />

t arg Max ( Varet )<br />

Otsu t L between class<br />

where L is the number of gray levels in each band, in our images L is 256 because each pixel<br />

is represented with eight bits.<br />

(2)<br />

(5)<br />

(7)<br />

(9)


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 175<br />

2.2.2 Unsupervised classification strategy by within-class and between-classes<br />

spectral variances<br />

There are three steps in the proposed classification strategy. First, the assignment process,<br />

that consists in assigning one of the possible classes to each pixel. Second, the codification of<br />

each cluster, which is identified by a label. Finally, a regrouping process so that very similar<br />

classes are merged into one.<br />

2.2.2.1 Assignment process<br />

Given a pixel i located at (x, y) in the original RGB image. Its three spectral components in<br />

this space are obtained, namely R(x, y) = ir, G(x, y) = ig and B(x, y) = ib.<br />

As already mentioned, the thresholding methods split the histogram into two regions. As<br />

there are three spectral components, six sub-regions are obtained. If necessary, successive<br />

thresholding can be applied to each spectral channel. The second thresholding produces<br />

three partitions per channel. If a third thresholding is applied, four regions per component<br />

are obtained and so on. Therefore, assuming that eventually the number of thresholds per<br />

channel is M, there will be tR1, tR2, … tRM , thresholds for channel R, and in the same way, tG1,<br />

tG2, …, tGM for component G, and tB1, tB2, …, tBM, for component B. Based on this, each pixel i<br />

can be coded as is according to its spectral components by Equation (10):<br />

0 if i t<br />

<br />

<br />

1 if t i t<br />

i<br />

<br />

s 2 if t i t<br />

<br />

M if is tsM<br />

s s1<br />

s1 s s2<br />

s2 s s3<br />

where s denotes the spectral component, i.e., s = R, G or B, and tsi are the consecutive<br />

thresholds.<br />

For example, it is known that in the RGB colour space values are in the range [0, 255]. So,<br />

considering the spectral component R with two thresholds, tR1 = 120 and tR2 = 199, a pixel<br />

will be coded as 0, 1, or 2, if its spectral value R is smaller than 120, between 120 and 199, or<br />

greater than 199, respectively.<br />

2.2.2.2 Cluster labelling<br />

Once the whole image has been coded, the next step is the labelling of the existing classes. If<br />

M thresholds haven been obtained, there are n = M + 1 histogram partitions per channel,<br />

and therefore the number of possible combinations is nd, where d is the number of spectral<br />

components, i.e., d = 3 in the RGB colour space. This number of combinations represents the<br />

number of classes. Each cluster is identified by its label. Every pixel is assigned its<br />

corresponding label according to Equation (11). So, given the pixel i ≡ (x, y) with codes , ı, and ı, its label will be given by P as follows:<br />

2<br />

i R G B<br />

(10)<br />

p ni ni i<br />

(11)<br />

2.2.2.3 Merging process<br />

Let Ck be the number of clusters obtained by the classification procedure, where k identifies<br />

a class between 1 and nd, each class containing Nk pixels of the original image. It could be


176<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

said that each class is defined by a tri-dimensional vector (d = 3). The elements of that vector<br />

are the spectral components of the pixels according to the RGB colour model, i.e., i ≡<br />

( , , ) for the pixel i ≡ (x, y), if the pixel and its spectral components belong to class Ck.<br />

For each class, the average value of the membership degrees to that class is calculated by<br />

Equation (12):<br />

k k k , , <br />

1<br />

k R G B ik<br />

(12)<br />

N<br />

k ikCk<br />

Based on the potential of Otsu’s method, it is possible to estimate the within-class and the<br />

between-classes spectral variances, denoted by k <br />

and kh respectively, according to<br />

Equations (1) and (16). Obviously, is only related to class Ck and, as expected, kh<br />

<br />

<br />

k<br />

involves the two classes Ck and Ch, k ≠ h:<br />

2<br />

1<br />

2 <br />

2<br />

k k k k k k<br />

k iR R iG G iB B<br />

<br />

dN <br />

k ikC<br />

<br />

k<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 k h<br />

2<br />

k h<br />

2<br />

k h<br />

2<br />

kh R R G G B B<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

d <br />

(14)<br />

Based on those variances, some classes can be fused due to their spectral similarities. The<br />

similarity is a concept defined as follows. Given the clusters Ck and Ch, for k ≠ h, they are<br />

merged if k kh h kh . This is based on the hypothesis that if a good partition is already<br />

achieved, the classes obtained are properly separated, without overlapping, and then no<br />

further fusion is required. On the contrary, if classes overlap, the between-class variance kh is<br />

greater than the individual within-class variances, k and j . This re-clustering process is<br />

repeated until all the between-class variances are greater than their corresponding within-class<br />

variances. Without lost of generality, if two classes are merged, the resulting fused class will be<br />

re-labelled with the name of the class with the smaller variance value. This does not affect the<br />

classification process because only labels are modified.<br />

After the fusion process, it must be checked if more clusters are necessary. This is carried<br />

out on the basis that if after the combination process no class has been fused, it means that<br />

more clusters are needed. A new clustering process starts again with the number of<br />

thresholds increased by one. This is repeated until a fusion occurs.<br />

2.3 Fuzzy C-Means clustering<br />

Fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM) is a data clustering technique wherein each data point<br />

belongs to a cluster to some degree that is specified by a membership grade. This technique<br />

was originally introduced by Jim Bezdek [11], as an improvement on earlier clustering<br />

methods.<br />

The FCM algorithm attempts to partition a finite collection of elements X x1, x2,..., xn<br />

into a collection of c fuzzy clusters with respect to some given criterion.<br />

The FCM algorithm, processes n vectors in p-space as data input, and uses them, in<br />

conjunction with first order necessary conditions for minimizing the FCM objective<br />

functional, to obtain estimates for two sets of unknowns.<br />

12<br />

(13)


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 177<br />

The unknowns in FCM clustering are:<br />

1. A fuzzy c-partition of the data, which is a c x n membership matrix U ik Vcnwith<br />

c rows and n columns. The values in row i give the membership of all n input data in<br />

cluster i for k=1 to n ; the k-th column of U gives the membership p of vector k (which<br />

represents some object k) in all c clusters for i=1 to c. Each of the entries in U lies in [0,1];<br />

each row sum is greater than zero; and each column sum equals 1.<br />

2. The other set of unknowns in the FCM model is a set of c cluster centers or prototypes,<br />

arrayed as the c columns of a p x c matrix V. These prototypes are vectors (points) in the<br />

input space of p-tuples. Pairs (U,V) of coupled estimates are found by alternating<br />

optimization through the first order necessary conditions for U and V. The objective<br />

function minimized in the original version measured distances between data points and<br />

prototypes in any inner product norm, and memberships were weighted with an<br />

exponent m>1<br />

That is:<br />

As X x1, x2,..., xnand<br />

the set all Vcn real matrices of dimension c x n, with 2 c n.<br />

Can<br />

be obtained a matrix representing the partition follow U ik Vcn.<br />

The basic definition<br />

FCM for m > 1 is to minimize the following objective function:<br />

n c<br />

m 2<br />

m ik<br />

k i G<br />

k1i1 G is a matrix of dimension pxp symmetric positive definite<br />

Where<br />

min z ( U; v) x v<br />

(15)<br />

<br />

2 t<br />

k i G k i k i<br />

x v x v G x v<br />

(16)<br />

i<br />

n<br />

1<br />

m<br />

n ik m k1<br />

ik <br />

k1<br />

k<br />

v x i 1,...,<br />

c<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

2 m1<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

xk v <br />

i G <br />

ik<br />

c <br />

2 m1<br />

<br />

i 1,..., c; k 1,...,<br />

n<br />

1 <br />

<br />

2 <br />

j1<br />

xk vj<br />

<br />

G<br />

<br />

The exponent m is known as exponential weight and reduces the influence of noise when<br />

getting the centers of the clusters. The higher the m > 1, the greater this influence. More<br />

details on fuzzy c-means clustering [11, 12].<br />

2.4 Methods for cluster validation<br />

Evaluation of clustering results (or cluster validation) is an important and necessary step in<br />

cluster analysis, but it is often time-consuming and complicated work [16].<br />

(17)<br />

(18)


178<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The procedure of evaluating the results of a clustering algorithm is known under the term<br />

cluster validity. In reference [15] two kinds of validity indices are showed: external indices<br />

and internal indices. A third is added in reference [29], based on relative criteria. The first is<br />

based on external criteria. This implies that we evaluate the results of a clustering algorithm<br />

based on a pre-specified structure, which is imposed on a data set and reflects our intuition<br />

about the clustering structure of the data set. The second approach is based on internal<br />

criteria. We may evaluate the results of a clustering algorithm in terms of quantities that<br />

involve the vectors of the data set themselves. The third approach of clustering validity is<br />

based on relative criteria. Here the basic idea is the evaluation of a clustering structure by<br />

comparing it to other clustering schemes, resulting by the same algorithm but with different<br />

parameter values.<br />

To evaluate the proposed classification method, five cluster validation techniques are<br />

applied, based on internal criteria. These indices are used to measure the "goodness" of the<br />

result of the grouping; comparing the proposed classification method against the old pattern<br />

recognition procedure called Fuzzy c-means clustering.<br />

2.4.1 Dunn’s index<br />

This index identifies sets of clusters that are compact and well separated. For any partition<br />

U X:X 1<br />

...Xc where Xi represents the ith cluster of such partition, the Dunn‘s<br />

validation index, D, is defined as:<br />

<br />

<br />

(<br />

X , X ) <br />

i j <br />

DU ( ) min min <br />

1 i c1jcmax (<br />

X<br />

k<br />

) <br />

ji <br />

1 k c<br />

<br />

<br />

where ( X<br />

i<br />

, X<br />

j<br />

) defines the distance between clusters Xi and Xj (intercluster distance);<br />

( X<br />

k<br />

) represents the intracluster distance of cluster Xk, and c is the number of clusters of<br />

partition U. The main goal of this measure is to maximize intercluster distances whilst<br />

minimizing intracluster distances. Thus large values of D correspond to good clusters.<br />

Therefore, the number of clusters that maximizes D is taken as the optimal number of<br />

clusters, c.<br />

2.4.2 Davies-Bouldin index<br />

As the Dunn’s index, the Davies-Bouldin index aims at identifying sets of clusters that are<br />

compact and well separated. The Davies-Bouldin validation index, DB, is defined as:<br />

( ) ( )<br />

1 c X<br />

i<br />

X <br />

j <br />

DB( U) max<br />

<br />

ci1 ( X<br />

i<br />

, X<br />

j<br />

) <br />

<br />

where U, ( X<br />

i<br />

, X<br />

j<br />

) , Δ(X<br />

i<br />

),Δ(X<br />

j<br />

) and c are defined as in equation (20). Small values of<br />

DB correspond to clusters that are compact, and whose centers are far away from each other.<br />

Therefore, the cluster configuration that minimizes DB is taken as the optimal number of<br />

clusters, c.<br />

(19)<br />

(20)


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 179<br />

2.4.3 Calinski and Harabasz index<br />

The index of Calinski and Harabasz is defined by:<br />

B /( 1)<br />

( ) k<br />

k<br />

CH k <br />

W<br />

k<br />

/( nk) where k denotes the number of clusters, and BK and Wk denote the between and within<br />

cluster sums of squares of the partition, respectively. Therefore an optimal number of<br />

clusters is then defined as a value of k that maximizes CH(k).<br />

2.4.4 Krzanowski and Lai index<br />

The index of Krzanowski and Lai is defined by:<br />

where;<br />

diff<br />

KL(k) k<br />

diff<br />

k1<br />

2/ p 2/ p<br />

diff<br />

k<br />

( K 1) W<br />

k 1<br />

k<br />

W<br />

(23)<br />

k<br />

and p denotes the number of features in the data set. Therefore a value of k is optimal if it<br />

maximizes KL(k).<br />

2.4.5 Hartigan index<br />

The index of Hartigan is defined by:<br />

(21)<br />

(22)<br />

( ) log B <br />

Han k k <br />

(24)<br />

W k <br />

where, BK and Wk denote the between and within cluster sums of squares of the partition,<br />

respectively. Therefore a value of k is optimal if it minimizes Han(k).<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

In accordance with the objectives and methodology used in this research encouraging<br />

results were obtained regarding the proposal to adopt the criterion used in Otsu's method to<br />

the process of clustering and unsupervised classification of colour images, and the<br />

application of cluster validity methods by five cluster validation indices, compare the results<br />

with those generated by the old pattern recognition procedure, Fuzzy c-means clustering.<br />

In the present paper three issues are addressed. First, our proposed RGB unsupervised<br />

classification method. Secondly, to compare results we apply an old pattern recognition<br />

procedure, the Fuzzy c-means clustering. Third, five of cluster validation indices will be<br />

proposed to evaluate the quality of clusterings. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our<br />

proposed RGB unsupervised classification method, using 16 digital images from colour<br />

aerial photographs in which they can observe different land cover objects such as buildings,


180<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

streets, roads, tree crop plots, temporary plots of crops, pastures, water bodies etc.. Due to<br />

limited space, only the results of one experiment are included.<br />

3.1 Unsupervised classification method by theory of the Otsu’s method (results)<br />

The proposed methodology is based on the method of Otsu. First a single thresholding of<br />

each of the bands of the RGB image, creating two classes per band as RGB in forming our<br />

startup account with eight classes. However, not all are representative, so that once<br />

segmented in this way the image is inserted through a sorting process exhaustive analysis of<br />

the variation between classes and within classes.<br />

According to the characteristics of land cover images, which must be considered objects<br />

with different heterogeneous properties in size, shape and spectral behavior, we make the<br />

classification of the image labeled and grouped by simple thresholding, using the<br />

comprehensive analysis of variances between classes and within classes, to group and<br />

classify objects in the image.<br />

Fig. 2. Image classified by the proposed classification Otsu method, where the optimal<br />

number of class is five.<br />

As a result of this process, the classifier automatically grouped the different objects of the<br />

landscape into five classes, generating the classified image showed in Fig. 2, and the number<br />

of pixels per class, you can see in Table 1. With size of 1 542 288 pixels per band, where<br />

53.1% of the surface of the image contains vegetation cover, the image represented by the<br />

blue color, and 14.8% contains bodies of water identified by the gray color. The 8.3% contain<br />

natural green grass, identified by the red color, 11.7% contains dry natural grass in the<br />

image identified by the yellow color, 12% contain areas without vegetation identified by the<br />

cyan color. Among the latter the accumulated deposits on the river bank, the effect of<br />

Hurricane Pauline, as well as streets and buildings are considered.


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 181<br />

Classes Pixels Color<br />

Plant Coverage 818,893 Blue<br />

Water Bodies 228,830 Gray<br />

Natural green grass 128,199 Red<br />

Dry natural grass 180,696 Yellow<br />

Area without vegetation coverage 185,670 Cyan<br />

TOTAL 1,542,288<br />

Table 1. distribution of the classification of Fig. 2<br />

3.2 The Fuzzy c-means clustering (results)<br />

As a result of this process, the classifier automatically grouped the different objects of the<br />

landscape into three classes, generating the classified image showed in Fig. 3, and the<br />

number of pixels per class you can see in Table 2. With size of 1 542 288 pixels per band,<br />

where 23% of the surface of the image contains plant coverage, identified by the green<br />

colour; 36% of the surface of the image contains trees, identified by the blue colour; 28% of<br />

the surface of the image contains natural green grass, identified by the red colour; 9% of the<br />

surface of the image contains dry natural grass, identified by the yellow colour; and 4% of<br />

the surface of the image contains the accumulated deposits on the river bank, the effect of<br />

hurricane Pauline, the image represented by the cyan colour.<br />

Fig. 3. Image classified by Fuzzy c-means clustering; where the optimal number of class by<br />

DB is five.


182<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

As showed in visual analysis (Fig. 2 and 3), our proposal clearly identifies the water bodies,<br />

whereas by Fuzzy c-means clustering classifier water bodies with grass coverage are<br />

confused.<br />

Classes Pixels Color<br />

Plant Coverage 358,176 green<br />

Trees 549,978 Blue<br />

Natural green grass 424,131 Red<br />

Dry natural grass 143,474 Yellow<br />

Area without vegetation coverage 66,529 Cyan<br />

TOTAL 1,542,288<br />

Table 2. Distribution of the classification of Fig. 3<br />

(a) (b)<br />

Fig. 4. Image classified by Fuzzy c-means clustering; where the optimal number of class is<br />

seven, by CH and Han, in (a); and two by Dunn and KL, in (b).<br />

3.3 Quantitative results to validate the optimal number of clusters<br />

Since clustering is an unsupervised method and there is no a priori indication for the actual<br />

number of clusters presented in a data set, there is a need of some kind of clustering result<br />

validation.


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 183<br />

The results of the classification of colour images from aerial photographs by the proposed<br />

Otsu’s method, and the method known as Fuzzy c-means clustering are evaluated using five<br />

levels of validation. These indices are detailed in Section 2.3. Since the results of the Fuzzy cmeans<br />

clustering algorithm, requires as input, the number of clusters, so it runs for 2.3, ..., 6;<br />

Fig. 3 corresponds to the optimal number of groups according to DB, who is the same as the<br />

proposed method.<br />

No. Class 2 3 4 5 6 7 Optimo<br />

DB 0.660 0.597 0.576 0.535* 0.605 0.584 minimum<br />

CH 2.222 3.018 3.317 3.600 3.810 3.891* maximum<br />

Dunn 2.374* 1.417 1.199 1.154 1.020 0.926 maximum<br />

KL 57.660* 37.527 29.976 25.080 21.922 20.104 maximum<br />

Han 36.324 18.041 11.896 8.577 6.639 5.494* minimum<br />

* optimal<br />

Table 3. Results obtained from 5 internal indices to validate the optimal number of clusters<br />

generated by Fuzzy c-means clustering.<br />

Davies-Bouldin Index says: the cluster configuration that minimizes DB is taken as the optimal<br />

number of clusters, therefore for this methodology, the optimal number of clusters is 5.<br />

Calinski and Harabasz Index says: an optimal number of clusters is then defined as a value of<br />

k that maximizes CH(k), therefore for this methodology, the optimal number of clusters is 7.<br />

The Dunn’s Index says: the value that maximizes D is taken as the optimal number of<br />

clusters, therefore for this methodology, the optimal number of clusters is 2.<br />

Krzanowski and Lai index says: a value of k is optimal if it maximizes KL(k), therefore for<br />

this methodology, the optimal number of clusters is 2<br />

Hartigan index says: a value of k is optimal if it minimizes Han(k). therefore for this<br />

methodology, the optimal number of clusters is 7.<br />

With the executed validation indices for Fuzzy c-means clustering, we want to find a match<br />

on the number of clusters of the new classification proposed. This was achieved with the<br />

Davies Bouldin index. Therefore, it indicates that the number of classes generated by the<br />

new classifier is optimal.<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

Otsu's method improved and changes implemented in this research can get the optimal<br />

threshold value as a basis for segmenting and classifying images in RGB color model, using<br />

a method of unsupervised classification.<br />

Under the principle of the concept of within-class and between-class variances as suggested<br />

by Otsu; the algorithm automatically regrouped and merged different values of the groups<br />

obtained from the image in RGB colour domain and once the within-class variance is less<br />

than the between-class variance for each clustered class, the algorithm is finished.


184<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Since this algorithm does not need to know how many classes are required to be clustered,<br />

five cluster validity indices have been proposed to validate if the number of clusters<br />

classified by Otsu is suitable. Davies Bouldin index indicates that the number of classes<br />

generated by the new classifier is optimal.<br />

Also the classification made by the proposed method is better than that Fuzzy c-means<br />

clustering, as showed in Fig. 2, our method properly classified water bodies, whereas Fuzzy<br />

c-means clustering confuses the water bodies with vegetation.<br />

This method unsupervised of image classification, can be widely used as support in<br />

decision-making in aspects of the environment by diagnosing areas of interest such as the<br />

loss of tree cover due to deforestation or fires, crop areas, Water Bodies, etc.. by virtue the<br />

proposed methodology to classify areas of different coverage density including areas where<br />

the soil surface has been exposed to erosion.<br />

5. Acknowledgment<br />

The authors would like to thank the World Bank from the Robert S. McNamara Fellowships<br />

Program (RSM) to support this research on: “Técnicas Inteligentes de Reconocimiento<br />

Aplicadas a la Clasificación del Uso del Suelo”.<br />

The Carolina Foundation and SRE_Mexico by co-financing for doctoral studies.<br />

The “Colegio de Postgraduados”, Mexico, for permission to join the Teachers' Training Sub-<br />

Investigators.<br />

The UNAM by providing the aerial images, which is essential material for this investigation.<br />

6. References<br />

[1] D. Lu, and Q. Weng. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for<br />

improving classification performance, Int. J. Remote Sensing 28(5):823-870.<br />

[2] A. K. Jain, M. N. Murty and P. J. Flynn. 1999. Data clustering: a review, ACM Computing<br />

Surveys, Vol. 31 (3):264-323.<br />

[3] E.R. Hunt; Cavigelli, M.; Daughtry, C.T.; McMurtrey, J.; Walthall, S.L. Evaluation of<br />

digital photography from model aircraft for remote sensing of crop biomass.<br />

Precision Agriculture 2005, 6 (4), 359-378.<br />

[4] X. Xie, and Majid Mirmehdi. 2007. Colour Image Segmentation using Texems, Annals of<br />

the British Machine Vision Association, (6):1-10.<br />

[5] X. Xie, 2008. A Review of Recent Advances in Surface Defect Detection using Texture<br />

Analysis Techniques, Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis,<br />

Special Issue on Quality Control by Artificial Vision, vol. 7( 3): 1 -25.<br />

[6] M. Haindl, and V. Havlicek. 2002. A simple multispectral multiresolution Markov<br />

texture model. In International Workshop on Texture Analysis and Synthesis, pp:<br />

63-66.<br />

[7] M. Dubuisson-Jolly, and A. Gupta. 2000. Color and texture fusion: Application to aerial<br />

image segmentation and GIS updating. Image and Vision Computing, 18:823-832.<br />

[8] C. Palm, 2004. Color texture classification by integrative co-occurrence matrices. Pattern<br />

Recognition, 37(5):965-976


Unsupervised Classification of Aerial Images Based on the Otsu’s Method 185<br />

[9] M. Mirmehdi, and M. Petrou. 2000. Segmentation of color textures. IEEE Transactions on<br />

Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(2):142-159.<br />

[10] N. Otsu, 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histogram. IEEE<br />

Transactions on System Man Cybernetics 9(1):62-66.<br />

[11] J. C. Bezdek, 1981. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms.<br />

Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA .<br />

[12] J. C. Bezdek , J. Keller, R. Krisnapuram, N. Pal. 2005. Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for<br />

Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets).<br />

Springer, 776 pp.<br />

[13] M. Halkidi, Y. Batistakis and M. Vazirgiannis. 2002a. Cluster validity methods: part I,<br />

SIGMOD Rec., Vol. 31(2):40-45.<br />

[14] M. Halkidi, Y. Batistakis and M. Vazirgiannis. 2002b. Cluster validity methods: part II,<br />

SIGMOD Rec., Vol. 31, (3). 19-27.<br />

[15] K. Wang, B. Wang, and L. Peng. 2009. CVAP: Validation for Cluster Analyses. Data<br />

Science. Journal 8(20), 88-93<br />

[16] M. Halkidi, Y. Batistakis, and M. Vazirgiannis. 2001. On Clustering Validation<br />

Techniques. Intelligent Information Systems Journal, 17 (2-3): 107-145.<br />

[17] J. Dunn. 1974. Well separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J.Cybernetics, Vol.<br />

4, pp. 95-104<br />

[18] J.C. Bezdek, and N.R. Pal. 1998 .Some new indexes of cluster validity, IEEE Transactions<br />

on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 28 (B):301-315<br />

[19] N. Bolshakova, and F. Azuaje. 2003 Cluster validation techniques for genome<br />

expression data. Signal Processing, 83(4): 825-833.<br />

[20] D.L. Davies, and D.W. Bouldin. 1979. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions<br />

on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 1(2):224-227<br />

[21] E. Dimitriadou, S. Dolnicar, and A. Weingessel. 2002 An examination of indexes for<br />

determining the Number of Cluster in binary data sets. Psychometrika, 67(1): 137-<br />

160.<br />

[22] S. Dudoit, and J. Fridlyand. 2002. A prediction-based resampling method for estimating<br />

the number of clusters in a dataset. Genome Biology, 3(7): 0036.1-21.<br />

[23] G. Shu, B. Zeng, Y. P Chen, and O. H. Smith. (2003) Performance assessment of kernel<br />

density clustering for gene expression profile data. Comparative and Functional<br />

Genomics, 4(3): 287-299.<br />

[24] R. Calinski, and J. Harabasz. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun<br />

Statistics 3:1-27.<br />

[25] W. Krzanowski, and Y. Lai. 1985. A criterion for determining the number of groups in a<br />

dataset using sum of squares clustering. Biometrics. 44:23-34.<br />

[26] J.A. Hartigan. 1985. Statistical theory in clustering. J Classification., 2:63-76.<br />

[27] Macedo, A.; Pajares, G.; Santos, M. Unsupervised classification with ground color cover<br />

images. Agrociencia 2010, 44, 711-722.<br />

[28] Macedo-Cruz, A.; Pajares, G.; Santos, M.; Villegas-Romero, I. Digital image sensorbased<br />

assessment of the status of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Crops after frost damage.<br />

Sensors 2011, 11, 6015-6036.


186<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

[29] F. Kovács, C. Legány, and A. Babos. 2005. Cluster validity measurement techniques.<br />

Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium of Hungarian Researchers on<br />

Computational Intelligence, Budapest, Nov. 2005, 18-19.


10<br />

Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation<br />

Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Anthony Stocks1, Andrew Noss2, Malgorzata Bryja2 and Santiago Arce2 1Idaho State University,<br />

2Wildlife Conservation Society – WCS<br />

USA<br />

One of the major forces of deforestation around the tropics is the chipping away of forested<br />

areas for pastures by agricultural peasants who are difficult to control by remote central<br />

governments (Colchester 1998) and by loggers who enjoy the same advantages of working<br />

in isolated areas as colonists and who tend to bring roads into the forest. The major danger<br />

to many forests is fire, made more likely by the agricultural colonization that follows road<br />

construction (Nepstad et al. 2001). In the Ecuadorean Amazon fire is not a major threat,<br />

probably because of the year-round rainfall regime that maintains high levels of humidity,<br />

and road construction is driven first by oil exploration and exploitation activities that in turn<br />

facilitate access and settlement by colonists and loggers (Bromley 1972; Viña et al. 2004).<br />

Ecuador’s 1964 Law of Agrarian Reform and Colonization classified large portions of<br />

Amazon as unoccupied, allowing colonists to claim 50 ha plots along roads, directly<br />

promoting deforestation by requiring proof of improvements to establish legal land titles<br />

(Bilsborrow et al. 2004; Bremner & Lu 2006; Fuentes 1997; Kimerling 1991).<br />

In many parts of the world, however, the tropical forests have potential allies in the form of<br />

indigenous people who have inhabited the forest for millennia and are anguished about<br />

seeing it degraded and cut down. In fact it is estimated at present that 85% of the world’s<br />

areas designated for biodiversity conservation are inhabited by indigenous peoples,<br />

whereas outside of the parks and nature preserves, the world’s remaining pristine forested<br />

habitats are nearly all occupied by indigenous peoples (Alcorn 2000; Colchester 2001;<br />

Schmidt & Peterson 2009; Weber et al. 2000). This is true of the Ecuadorean Amazon in<br />

particular (GeoPlaDes 2010). In fact, conservation-minded outsiders have only a few choices<br />

it they want protection for these habitats. They can try to protect the forests while excluding<br />

the indigenous people – treating them essentially as fauna and making enemies of them – or<br />

they can assist them as allies (Colchester 2000, 2004; Schwartzman et al. 2000). The latter<br />

choice carries its own problems. Not all indigenous people want to save the forest, given<br />

their current assessment of costs and benefits of doing so; a certain amount of discrimination<br />

is necessary. Those who do usually want to either own the land (Colchester 2000), or, in the<br />

case of protected areas, to have signed legal agreements with governments giving them use


188<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

and management (or co-management) rights which carries its own problems with<br />

coordination, bureaucracy and political will on the part of the state.<br />

Although recognition of ownership and/or control of large tracts of land by private<br />

individuals or groups is easy for conservationists in the developed world, it becomes much<br />

more problematic in remote forest frontiers where indigenous people may be less visible,<br />

forested areas are often not densely populated and conservationists may have closer<br />

relationships with governments than with indigenous peoples. Hence, efforts in countermapping<br />

have become common in the past 20 years in order to identify the areas occupied<br />

by and claimed by indigenous peoples (Chapin &Threlkeld 2001; Peluso 1995; Poole 1998;<br />

Stocks 2003; Stocks & Taber 2011; Wainwright & Bryan 2009).<br />

Are indigenous people, once they have control and appropriate resources, able to protect<br />

forested habitats? Many would say that it is a mistake to equate indigenous occupation with<br />

conservation (e.g., Redford & Stearman 1993; Redford & Sanderson 2000). While this may be<br />

true as a general statement, the specific local outcome depends on a number of factors that<br />

include indigenous levels of organization, the kinds of resources available, their sense of<br />

place connected with a history of occupation, their own economy and the political power of<br />

competitors– industrial or individual – that also seek to occupy the forest. Evidence from a<br />

few sources in the neo-tropics indicates that when indigenous people are protecting a<br />

historic homeland with some outside help, they tend to be more successful in maintaining<br />

forests than colonist populations faced with essentially the same economic realities<br />

(Colchester 2000; Lu et al. 2010; Nepstad et al. 2006; Ricketts et al. 2010; Soares et al. 2010;<br />

Stocks et al. 2007). Indeed, in the Brazilian Amazon, the inhibitory effect on deforestation of<br />

various kinds of protected areas (strict protection, sustainable use, indigenous lands and<br />

military areas) is greatest in the category of indigenous lands (Soares et al. 2010). In the<br />

Ecuadorean Amazon this feature of indigenous lands is particularly notable in the A’í<br />

(Kofán) case (Borman et al. 2007) and the protection by the A’í of their forests on titled<br />

(resguardo) lands is also true in Colombia. One recent study with a broad world-wide sample<br />

argues that forests owned and/or controlled by local communities, tend to have less<br />

deforestation. Livelihood benefits and carbon storage both increase when the historic<br />

dwellers own the land or can otherwise control land use (Chhartre & Agrawal 2009).<br />

This chapter is premised on the idea that the Waodani people of Ecuador have the essential<br />

prerequisites of ownership, sense of historic occupation, threats from colonists and outside<br />

assistance to halt the deforestation of their titled territory; and that physical demarcation of<br />

their land is a necessary step in the protection of the forest. However, the particular kind of<br />

political organization they currently exhibit, the nature of the colonists that are deployed along<br />

their frontiers, industries within their territory, and overlaps with national protected areas<br />

make demarcation a somewhat different exercise than one would think. The rest of this paper<br />

explores the history of demarcation and the consolidation of land under their control and<br />

process of providing technical assistance to them in the face of what we have called “shaky<br />

politics.” The dilemma of working with the Waodani is not uncommon in conservation.<br />

Conservationists of tropical forests typically encounter groups with essentially egalitarian<br />

political philosophies who find the establishment of hierarchical bureaucracies difficult to<br />

maintain and impossible to make function in the ways that western bureaucracies operate<br />

with top-down control. What makes the Waodani case an outlier relates to the recentness of<br />

their permanent contact with western civilization and the powerful forces arrayed against<br />

their own control and management of their titled territories. There is something to learn about<br />

working with indigenous people in conservation from this case.


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

2. The Waodani people and their territory<br />

The Waodani (also known as Huaorani or Auca) were the last indigenous people in Ecuador<br />

to be “integrated” into the western world, with two clans—the Tagaeri and Taromenane—<br />

remaining in “voluntary isolation” to this day. Their language has no known relatives and at<br />

the time of contact only included two words borrowed from other languages (Trujillo León<br />

1996); their DNA confirms their extended isolation from neighboring peoples (Cardoso et al.<br />

2008; González-Andrade et al. 2009). A tiny population of no more than 500 people<br />

defended with their spears through random and dispersed raids a vast territory of over<br />

20,000 km 2 between the Napo and Curaray rivers from all outsiders—Kichwas, colonists, oil<br />

companies, the Ecuadorean military, and missionaries (Cabodevilla 1999; Holt et al. 2004;<br />

Kane 1993). They did not participate in historical trade networks and emphasized extreme<br />

closure from all outsiders whom they call “cowode” or cannibals (Rival 1999). Their political<br />

structure was egalitarian—centered on the “nanicabo” or family longhouse—with no<br />

classes, no chiefs or leaders. Gender roles were also flexible (Holt et al. 2004). A man could<br />

become a leader for a specific event, and when the event passed so did his leadership. The<br />

intensely independent and individualistic social system led to frequent divisions of<br />

nanicabos and/or moves to distance themselves from conflicts and to escape retaliation. The<br />

primary mechanism for social control was peer pressure, with the ultimate threat of death<br />

by spearing (Rival 1999; Yost 1991).<br />

Under increasing pressure from oil companies exploring their territory for oil reserves and<br />

from colonists in the early 1950s, the Waodani responded with spearing raids, at the same<br />

time intensifying an internal cycle of violence that produced the highest rate of death by<br />

homicide for any indigenous group anywhere (Beckerman et al. 2009), and induced several<br />

young women to escape to neighboring Kichwa farms where they became slaves (Yost<br />

1981). An attempt by Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) missionaries to make peaceful<br />

contact resulted in five missionaries being speared in 1956—an event that brought<br />

worldwide attention to the plight of the Waodani (Eliot 1958). Two SIL women, one sister<br />

and one wife of the murdered missionaries, subsequently worked with one of the escaped<br />

Waodani women to learn the language, and together the three made peaceful contact with a<br />

first Waodani clan in 1958 (Yost 1981). SIL intensified their efforts and brought several clans<br />

together in an area known as the “Protectorado”, in the west of the historically occupied<br />

Waodani territory, and made the first formal territorial claim to the Ecuadorean government<br />

in 1964 (Yost 1979). CONFENIAE (Confederación de las Nacionalidades Indígenas de la<br />

Amazonía Ecuatoriana) provided further backing for this territorial demand, resulting in the<br />

first Waodani land title in 1983 for 66,000 ha of the Protectorado which effectively cleared<br />

the way for oil activities and the opening of the vía Auca further east (Kane 1993, Kimerling<br />

1991). The second and most important land title was awarded to the Waodani in 1990 and<br />

also represented a favor to oil companies, converting a large portion of the Yasuní National<br />

Park (declared in 1979) to Waodani territory, but under the condition that the Waodani did<br />

not oppose oil activities on their new lands (Kimerling 1991; Rival 1992), and recognizing<br />

the Auca road and collateral colonization as a massive cut into Waodani territory.<br />

The legally recognized lands of what number today approximately 3500 Waodani<br />

indigenous people in Ecuador therefore amount to around 700,000 hectares in three separate<br />

land titles given at three points in history with formal ownership vested in somewhat<br />

different ways (Figure 1 and Table 1). Additionally, a number of Waodani communities are<br />

located in the Yasuni National Park, while two Waodani clans remain formally<br />

189


190<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

“uncontacted” and range widely within the titled territory and the park. All in all, the<br />

Waodani inhabit over 1.5 million hectares of land in the rainy upper Amazon and Andean<br />

foothills, arguably the world’s most biodiverse forest (Bass et al. 2010).<br />

Fig. 1. Waodani territory titles (Lara et al. 2002b) 1<br />

Year By whom and to whom Extension (ha)<br />

1960 (1983) IERAC (Instituto Ecuatoriano de Reforma Agraria<br />

y Colonización) to Waodani Ethnic Group,<br />

specifying the “community organizations”<br />

Tiweno, Tzapino, Wamono, Kiwaro, Dayuno,<br />

Toñampade<br />

1990 / 1998 IERAC to the “Waorani Ethnicity”, specifying the<br />

community organizations identified as:<br />

Kewediono, Damointado, Nuevo Tiweno,<br />

Kenaweno, Nuevo Golondrina, Cononaco,<br />

Owanamo, Tagaeri, Tiwino and Yasuní<br />

2001 INDA (Instituto Nacional de Desarrollo Agrario)<br />

to the Organización de Nacionalidades Waodani<br />

de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana (ONHAE)<br />

Table 1. Waodani territory titles (Lara et al. 2002b)<br />

66,570<br />

612,560 / 613,750<br />

29,019<br />

1The size of the first title is inaccurately represented in this map. The first territory has never been<br />

accurately georeferenced.


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

The process of land titling has accompanied an equally ambiguous process of organizational<br />

development for the Waodani. The Protectorado experience, while it brought an end to the<br />

more overt internal violence, was traumatic as it combined the initial contact with the west<br />

(sedentary communities, change in diets and technologies, dependence on outsiders for<br />

subsistence and new material goods, change in health conditions) with intense social change<br />

because of the concentration of the population in a small area, a new generalized leadership<br />

by a woman who acted as cultural broker, controlling the flow goods and services from<br />

missionaries and other outsiders (replacing the traditional situational leadership by men),<br />

and new relationships with Kichwas through marriage that facilitated access by Waodani to<br />

external resources while at the same time permitting access by Kichwas to Waodani natural<br />

resources and land (Holt et al. 2004; Yost 1981; 1991). As early as 1972, however, the<br />

Waodani in the Protectorado began returning to areas they had previously occupied to the<br />

west, in some cases settling near oil operations in order to benefit from work and gifts<br />

provided by the companies.<br />

3. The development of Waodani political representation<br />

The first formal Waodani political organization, ONHAE (Organización de la<br />

Nacionalidad Huaorani del Ecuador), was not constituted until 1990, by the first young<br />

Waodani men who had received formal education in Spanish, and supported by the oil<br />

company Maxus which required a formal counterpart to secure its operations in Waodani<br />

territory. In 1993 Maxus signed a ground-breaking 20-year agreement with ONHAE<br />

(although numerous oil companies work in Waodani territory this remains the only<br />

agreement signed with the Waodani organization and benefitting the Waodani people as<br />

a whole; subsequent agreements have only benefitted the communities within the oil<br />

company’s area of operations), providing resources for the organization itself and its<br />

leaders, as well as health, education and community development resources (Rival 2000).<br />

This agreement has been maintained by the Spanish company, Repsol, which took over<br />

Maxus operations in 1996. At the same time, however, in line with indigenous rights<br />

agendas and indigenous political organizations including CONFENIAE and CONAIE<br />

(Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador), ONHAE founders also<br />

expressed the new organization’s mission as preventing oil exploitation and road<br />

construction in Waodani territory, emitting a series of declarations to that effect since 1991<br />

(Lara et al. 2002a; Rival 1992). It appears, therefore, that the Waorani might have chosen<br />

the card that had been dealt. Even Ziegler-Otero (2004: 6) agrees that ‘to preserve any<br />

semblance of cultural self-determination, indigenous people must be capable of<br />

negotiating.’ Negotiating and making a deal with Maxus offered the Waorani at least<br />

some tangible – though temporary - benefits in the context where rejecting those benefits<br />

would have left the Waorani empty-handed. Indeed, there are facts indicating that the<br />

Waorani were aware of the dilemma and they chose the pact with Maxus as ‘a lesser evil’.<br />

As Aviles (2008:42-43) states, ONHAE representatives first attracted the attention of the<br />

public by marching in Quito and denouncing both Maxus and Petroecuador (Ecuadorian<br />

oil company). The fact that the same people ended up signing the deal with Maxus shortly<br />

afterwards demonstrates the ultimate powerlessness of the Ecuadorian indigenous people<br />

in their dealings with the state and the external sources of revenues. This turn of events<br />

191


192<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

also shows the reason why dealings with the Waorani have been so frustrating for many<br />

international environmentalists. They resent ONHAE’s perceived lack of principles and<br />

feel that the leadership has ‘signed agreements with the Ecuadorian state and the oil<br />

companies, in apparent contradiction of their organizational positions and public<br />

statements’ (Ziegler-Otero:1).<br />

ONHAE and its successor organization, NAWE (Nacionalidad Waodani del Ecuador), since<br />

2007 therefore represent a radically new form of political organization for the Waodani,<br />

structured as required by external “western” agencies including the government and the oil<br />

companies as well as NGOs. A president and other leaders (“dirigentes” for education,<br />

health, territory, tourism, etc.) are elected by representatives of the various communities at<br />

assemblies held irregularly every 3-18 months. The communities themselves, now<br />

numbering over 40, are new social and political structures, though in practice they have not<br />

greatly altered the traditional nanicabo social system, despite boasting presidents and other<br />

leaders. Thus new communities continue to form, often with only one or two families who<br />

have moved away from another community because of disagreements or to gain access to<br />

new resources including external assistance. Often the community presidents are not the de<br />

facto authority in the community, and a number of “big men” act as local leaders<br />

negotiating with ONHAE/NAWE, with other influential Waodani individuals and<br />

communities, and with external actors. To the degree that external actors (government<br />

representatives, oil companies, NGOs) make agreements with these “big men”, obviously<br />

the strength of ONHAE/NAWE is undermined, and the generation of a Waodani<br />

conscience and unity falters.<br />

External actors assume that ONHAE/NAWE intermediate on behalf of the Waodani<br />

people, as a form of representative democracy whereby the leaders make decisions that<br />

express the will of the people, and sign agreements including land titles with<br />

ONHAE/NAWE on behalf of the Waodani people as a whole (Ziegler-Otero 2004). In<br />

contrast, the Waodani people themselves consider ONHAE/NAWE’s primary role to be<br />

the negotiation with oil companies (primarily Maxus/Repsol because individuals and<br />

communities negotiate directly with the other oil companies whose concessions overlap<br />

with the particular community’s land) and the administration of the oil company-financed<br />

projects (distribution of benefits including health services, school lunches and other<br />

education services, and other goods and services). A traditional mark of Waorani<br />

leadership is the ability to get goods from outsiders and the Maxus/Repsol negotiation<br />

reaffirms the traditional orientation of their leadership (Ziegler-Otero 2004:129). The<br />

people in the communities do not expect ONHAE/NAWE to make other kinds of<br />

decisions on their behalf (High 2006). Thus, one primary challenge for today’s NAWE is to<br />

provide – in addition to the social services – technical services that add value to the<br />

organization and involve them in overall conservation and development planning for<br />

Waodani holdings.<br />

Whereas fire is not the danger in eastern Ecuador that it poses in Brazil, nonetheless<br />

colonization and road-building fuel deforestation. For the Waodani, the colonization has<br />

historically been Kichwa migrants settling along the Napo River on the north who gradually<br />

have deforested land towards the interior, and Kichwa and other migrants settling along the<br />

Curaray River on the south with the same effect (Trujillo León 1996). Oil production has<br />

driven colonization (Kichwa, Shuar, and mestizo colonists) by penetrating the very heart of


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

the Waodani titled territory with two roads from north to south: one, the Via Auca since<br />

1980 which has sparked uncontrolled settlement and the other, the Via Maxus since 1993<br />

with relatively tight control over settlement by the Maxus and Repsol oil companies in turn<br />

(Finer et al. 2009; Kane 1993; Rival 1992; Villaverde et al. 2005). On the west, the major<br />

impacts have come from the expansion of the national agricultural frontier toward the<br />

Amazon with numerous roads connecting the rivers that flow from the Andes to join<br />

eventually with the Amazon River. Urban settlement near Waodani borders is common. On<br />

the east the titled territory is bordered by the Yasuní National Park which, at present,<br />

remains relatively un-colonized and is, as indicated above, the location of numerous<br />

Waodani communities. The two clans out of contact range both in the park and in the<br />

eastern part of the titled territory (Figures 2 & 3).<br />

Fig. 2. The Waodani territory within the Yasuní Biosphere Reserve (MAE, MGDF, UNESCO,<br />

WCS 2011).<br />

193


194<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 3. The Waodani territory, Yasuní National Park, and neighbors (WCS elaboration).<br />

4. WCS and the IMIL project: Strategies for shoring up the political structure<br />

and supporting conservation<br />

The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) has been working with the Waodani organization<br />

NAWE since 2007, under the USAID-financed “Integrated Management of Indigenous<br />

Lands” (IMIL) Project. The project provides continuation to a previous phase of USAID<br />

funding through the Chemonics-administered CAIMAN (Conservación de Áreas Indígenas<br />

Manejadas) project (2002-2007). WCS and NAWE signed a formal memorandum of<br />

understanding, and subsequently a sub-grant agreement, in order to promote territorial<br />

consolidation, institution-strengthening, capacity-building, and alliances with other<br />

organizations to support the Waodani people, culture and territory. The principal territorial<br />

concern expressed by NAWE to WCS and in a strategic planning exercise (Vallejo &<br />

Burbano 2008) was to complete the physical demarcation of the territory begun years before<br />

with CONFENIAE assistance (Kimerling 1991) and also advanced under the CAIMAN<br />

project (Chemonics International 2007). The principal institutional priority expressed by<br />

NAWE was the incorporation of Waodani technical staff to the organization, and the<br />

training of this staff. WCS therefore discussed with NAWE ways to address both issues<br />

through the consolidation of a technical team of Waodani mapping technicians who are<br />

capable of collecting field information with a GPS (Global Positioning System) unit and<br />

generating basic maps in ArcView. Additionally the IMIL project has approached the<br />

organizational strengthening of NAWE through providing USAID funds that NAWE can


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

use to carry out its own contract negotiation with outside technical actors. The outcome so<br />

far indicates a marked improvement in NAWE planning and responsibility for projects, a<br />

small but significant step in consolidating the territory and gaining community confidence.<br />

For example, NAWE technicians trained under the IMIL project have assumed<br />

responsibility for developing and implementing agreements with the Ministry of<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>’s Socio Bosque program (described further below) as well as community<br />

management plans; one has been elected community president, and others were hired by<br />

the Ministry of Justice in its program to protect the Tagaeri Taromenane Intangible Zone<br />

(described further below).<br />

The demarcation process successfully completed the remaining 89 km of territorial<br />

boundary between Waodani and neighboring Kichwa communities. These boundaries<br />

followed more or less those established in the legal titles, with local adjustments made by<br />

consensus with the Kichwa neighbors according to history of use and prior verbal<br />

agreements. The Waodani did not consider it necessary to demarcate the boundary with the<br />

Yasuní National Park as their elders, at least, consider the park to be part of their territory.<br />

In addition, during the boundary demarcation process WCS discussed with NAWE and the<br />

technicians the role of community mapping as a tool for territorial management, finding that<br />

ONHAE/NAWE had already recognized its importance in their territorial management<br />

plan (Lara et al. 2002a) and in their strategic plan (Marchán 2006) developed previously but<br />

not implemented. An enormous challenge facing the Waodani is the imposition of external<br />

management systems and boundaries on their territory—with at least eight active oil<br />

exploration and exploitation concessions overlapping Waodani territory. One assessment<br />

describes the titled Waodani territory as under the administration of oil companies with the<br />

approval of the government (Lara et al. 2002a).<br />

Also overlapping Waodani territory are a series of protected areas which each restrict<br />

Waodani actions: the Yasuní National Park was created in 1979, with significant boundary<br />

adjustments in 1989 and again in 1992; the Yasuní Biosphere Reserve was declared in 1989<br />

(including the entire Waodani territory); and the Tagaeri-Taromenane intangible zone was<br />

declared in 1999 and formally demarcated in 2007 (Finer et al. 2009; Lara et al. 2002a;<br />

Villaverde et al. 2005). The Waodani communities currently located within the Yasuní<br />

National Park are not permitted under Ecuadorean law to obtain land titles (Ecolex 2003).<br />

While the Waodani at times express their ignorance of these boundaries including the<br />

Yasuní National Park, the Tagaeri-Taromenane Intangible Zone, and even the border with<br />

Peru (Randi Randi 2003), the borders in practice mean that other actors are managing<br />

significant portions of Waodani territory. In addition, the 2008 Ecuador Constitution ratifies<br />

the government’s rights to sub-surface resources including oil and minerals, but also forest<br />

resources and environmental services (Bremner & Lu 2006; Reed 2011). Thus the Waodani<br />

are legal owners but not actual administrators of their territory (CARE 2002).<br />

Community mapping therefore represents a tool whereby the Waodani can visualize and<br />

negotiate with others their own land and resource use plans, zoning, and vision for their<br />

territory (Alcorn 2000; Eghenter 2000; Peluso 1995).<br />

The first community that requested assistance from NAWE and WCS technicians in<br />

undertaking a community mapping effort was Kewediono (= Keweriono / Que’hueriono)<br />

motivated by the association which unites five neighboring communities and which has<br />

developed a world-class and internationally acclaimed eco-tourism project—the Huaorani<br />

Ecolodge - supported by Tropic Tours in Nature. These communities had previously<br />

195


196<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

defined a strict conservation area surrounding the lodge itself, and wanted maps to<br />

illustrate and reinforce these management decisions. The subsistence hunting area is the<br />

bulk of the territory, and is not subject to logging or deforestation for cultivation, while less<br />

than 1% of the territory has been deforested for farms and settlements (Custodio et al. 2008).<br />

The second set of communities requesting support is led by Gadeno (Gareno) which also<br />

boasts a tourism project, though one operated privately under concession to the Gadeno big<br />

man. The distribution of zones is similar to that for Kewediono (Table 2), with the detail that<br />

Gadeno also identified a small sacred area where the first Waodani had settled in this region<br />

(Custodio et al. 2009) and the mapping effort revealed an unsuspected zone where no<br />

hunting was permitted according to the tradition of the community of Meñempade, located<br />

on the same map as Gadeno.<br />

Communities Total area<br />

(ha)<br />

Conservation % Hunting % Deforested %<br />

Kewediono, Kakatado,<br />

Wentado, Apaika,<br />

Nenkipade<br />

59,900 7 92


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

territory (Stocks & Espín 2010), and is intended by the communities to serve as a tool for<br />

negotiating a co-management agreement with the National Park for the areas utilized by the<br />

communities, as well as for joining the Socio Bosque program. Lacking a title, the comanagement<br />

agreement is a pre-requisite for Socio Bosque. The northern boundary<br />

recognized by the communities is the Tiputini river, a boundary agreed with neighboring<br />

Kichwa communities, though both Waodani and Kichwa venture across the boundary. The<br />

recognition of the Yasuní park boundaries is also conditional on whether or not individuals<br />

perceive that the park and Ministry of <strong>Environment</strong> are providing benefits. Guiyedo is also<br />

the first community mapping exercise to include locations where signs of the Tagaeri-<br />

Taromenane uncontacted groups have been found by the Waodani.<br />

Withal, the mapping work with communities has identified the hunting turfs probably<br />

associated with the first Nanicabo settlements in each of the areas. These turfs (loosely called<br />

‘community territories’) are well-known by community elders and each contains areas<br />

identified with at least some hunting restrictions. In a situation of “shaky politics” at the<br />

level of the ethnic group, the turfs or territories reassure communities that their own<br />

management will be respected. Additionally demarcation at the level of the titled territory<br />

assures local communities that their land claims are taken seriously by the central<br />

authorities and that they share a common border with other Nanicabo communities. The<br />

ambiguity with regard to their neighbors of other ethnicities is somewhat resolved by the<br />

series of inter-community border agreements. In terms of strategy, the training of a technical<br />

team fielded by the central organization, NAWE, has proved to be successful, both in terms<br />

of getting the work done competently in association with professionals contracted by<br />

NAWE and in terms of community perceptions of added value to NAWE itself. The<br />

community conservation areas, now firmly geo-referenced, are the basis for agreements<br />

with the Pre-REDD+ program, Sociobosque, and will undoubtedly play a significant role in<br />

later REDD+ programs. Certainly it cannot be argued that these lands are not under<br />

pressure from deforestation by Kichwas and colonists entering Waodani territory. The<br />

efforts of NAWE and the communities to develop and implement local boundary and<br />

territory monitoring programs will continue to be critical in protecting them.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

The central issue in this chapter has been an attempt to avoid deforestation in one of the<br />

world’s most productive and critically threatened habitats through consolidating the hold of<br />

indigenous people on the land and by working with an indigenous organization with a<br />

tenuous hold on legitimacy and a limited mandate from communities in order to improve<br />

resource management and conservation. This is a challenge that most serious<br />

conservationists encounter at some time in their career if they work around forest frontiers.<br />

There is no easy recipe for success or guarantee that the forest will not disappear in a<br />

determined number of years, but our experience is that the probability of encountering a<br />

relatively intact forest in, say, 50 years is greatest if indigenous people are in control of the<br />

outcome in areas they have historically inhabited, and greater still if they still maintain<br />

language and customs connected to their historic past. The work IMIL has done with the<br />

Waodani so far has, arguably, increased both the definition of the land controlled by them in<br />

general and specifically by community – land that includes large areas of no-commercialhunting<br />

zones – and their ability to relate to a central ethnic organization that can be trusted<br />

to provide valuable assistance in the defense of land.<br />

197


198<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Because of the economy of the Waodani, the land they control is 99% or more in forest, so<br />

from a carbon perspective any investment in stability has benefits beyond the forest patches<br />

actually counted as conservation land. Such situations should be obvious targets for<br />

financing through global carbon markets as REDD+ proposes to do.<br />

From the point of view of a conservationist, the key to working with the Waodani is the<br />

recognition of their sovereignty over land and resources. This recognition should not carry<br />

with it the assumption that the Waodani people are “cultural” ecologists. Actually, they are<br />

and their ecological knowledge runs deep, but the social expression of their own ecological<br />

adaptation involved levels of violence no longer tolerated in the Ecuadorian state. The modern<br />

adaptation to multiple cash sources and the heritage of decentralized political control has left<br />

them more vulnerable than most groups, so the importance of a central organization with<br />

some input into resource management is emphasized by the situation. The rub will come if the<br />

state tries to exercise its own constitutionally-granted rights to the forests in imposed ways<br />

that do not recognize Waodani sovereignty. One hopes that wise heads prevail in the<br />

government ministries that deal with the Waodani. If the Waodani are assisted to manage the<br />

forests in ways that strike them as culturally appropriate, everyone wins.<br />

6. References<br />

Alcorn, J.B. 2000. Borders, rules and governance: mapping to catalyse changes in policy and<br />

management. Gatekeeper Series no. 91. London: IIED. 22 pp.<br />

Arce, S., P. Landivar & A. Stocks. 2009. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de la comunidad<br />

de Kiwado. Technical Report #16. Puyo: NAWE, WCS.<br />

Arce, S., G. Bryja & D. Espín. 2011. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de la comunidad de<br />

Damointado. Technical Report #21. Puyo: NAWE, WCS.<br />

Aviles, M.D. 2008. Narratives of resistance: an ethnographic view of the emergence of the<br />

Huaorani women’s association in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Master's thesis.<br />

Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida.<br />

Bass, M.S., M. Finer, C.N. Jenkins, H. Kreft, D.F. Cisneros-Heredia, S.F. McCracken, N.C.A.<br />

Pitman, P.H. English, K. Swing, G. Villa, A. di Fiore, C.C. Voigt & T.H. Kunz. 2010.<br />

Global conservation significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park. PLoS ONE<br />

5(1):1-22.<br />

Beckerman, S., P.I. Erickson, J. Yost, J. Regalado, L. Jaramillo, C. Sparks, M. Iromenga & K.<br />

Long. 2009. Life histories, blood revenge, and reproductive success among the<br />

Waorani of Ecuador. PNAS 106(20):8134-8139.<br />

Bilsborrow, R.E., A.F. Barbieri & W. Pan. 2004. Changes in population and land use over<br />

time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazonica 34(4):635-647.<br />

Borman, R., C. Vriesendorp, W.S. Alverson, D.K. Moskovits, D.F. Stotz & Á. del Campo.<br />

2007. Ecuador: Territorio Cofán Dureno. Rapid Biological Inventories: 19. Chicago:<br />

The Field Museum.<br />

Bremner, J. & F. Lu. 2006. Common property among indigenous peoples of the Ecuadorian<br />

Amazon. Conservation and Society 4(4):499-521.<br />

Bromley, R.J. 1972. Agricultural colonization in the upper Amazon basin: the impact of oil<br />

discoveries. Tijdschrift voor Econ. en Soc. Geografie 63:278-294.<br />

Cabodevilla, M.A. 1999. Los Huaorani en la historia de los pueblos del Oriente. Coca:<br />

CICAME. 488 pp.


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

Cardoso, S.M., A. Alfonso-Sánchez, F. González-Andrade, L. Valverde, A. Odriozola, A.M.<br />

Pérez-Miranda, J.A. Peña, B. Martínez-Jarreta & M.M. de Pancorbo. 2008.<br />

Mitochondrial DNA in Huaorani (Ecuadorian amerindians): a new variant in<br />

haplogroup A2. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 1:269-<br />

270.<br />

CARE. 2002. Monito ome Ecuador Quihuemeca (Nuestra tierra en el Ecuador): propuesta<br />

para una circunscripción territorial Huaorani. Quito: Proyecto SUBIR. 28 pp.<br />

Chapin, M. & B. Threlkeld. 2001. Indigenous landscapes: A Study in Ethnocartography.<br />

Arlington, VA: Center for the Support of Native Lands, 2001.<br />

Chemonics International. 2007. Helping indigenous nationalities in Ecuador conserve their<br />

territory and culture. Quito: United States Agency for International Development.<br />

Chhartre A. & A. Agrawal. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and<br />

livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc of the Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17667–<br />

17670.<br />

Colchester, M. 1998. Who will garrison the fortresses? A reply to Spinage. Oryx 32(3):11–13.<br />

Colchester, M. 2000. Self-determination or environmental determinism for indigenous<br />

peoples in tropical forest conservation. Conservation Biology 14:1365–1367.<br />

Colchester, M. 2001. Global policies and projects in Asia: indigenous peoples and<br />

biodiversity conservation. Publication 130. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.<br />

Colchester, M. 2004. Conservation policy and indigenous peoples. Cultural Survival<br />

Quarterly 28(1):17-23.<br />

Custodio, S., A. Stocks, G. Bryja & G. Remache. 2008. Mapeo participativo y zonificación del<br />

territorio de la Asociación Keweriono. Technical Report No. 7. Puyo: NAWE y<br />

WCS.<br />

Custodio, S., A. Stocks & G. Bryja. 2009. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de las<br />

comunidades del sector de Gareno (Gareno, Konipare, Meñepare y Dayuno).<br />

Technical Report No. 8. Puyo: NAWE y WCS.<br />

de Koning, F., M. Aguińaga, M. Bravo, M. Chiu, M. Lascano, T. Lozada & L. Suárez. 2011.<br />

Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: the<br />

Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program. <strong>Environment</strong>al Science & Policy 14:531-542.<br />

Ecolex. 2003. Informe de identificación y caracterización de conflictos en los territorios Awá,<br />

Cofán y Huaorani. Quito: Ecolex. 42 pp.<br />

Eghenter, C. 2000. Mapping peoples' forests: the role of mapping in planning communitybased<br />

management of conservation areas in Indonesia. Peoples, Forests and Reefs<br />

(PeFoR) Program Discussion Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: Biodiversity Support<br />

Program. 40 pp.<br />

Eliot, E. 1958. Through gates of splendor. New York: Harper & Row.<br />

Espín, D., P. Landivar & G. Bryja. 2010. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de la comunidad<br />

de Teweno. Technical Report #18. Puyo: NAWE, WCS.<br />

Finer, M., V. Vijay, F. Ponce, C.N. Jenkins & T.R. Kahn. 2009. Ecuador's Yasuní Biosphere<br />

Reserve: a brief modern history and conservation challenges. <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Research Letters 4:1-15.<br />

Fuentes C., B. 1997. Huaomoni, Huarani, Cowudi: una aproximación a los Huaorani en la<br />

práctica política multi-étnica ecuatoriana. Quito: Abya Yala.<br />

GeoPlaDes. 2010. Estudio Multitemporal de Cobertura Vegetal y Uso del Suelo entre los<br />

Años 1990, 2010 y Proyección al 2030 a Escala 1:50.000 para el Centro y Sur Oriente<br />

199


200<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana y Sistematización de la información sobre los aspectos<br />

socio-económicos y culturales para facilitar la toma de decisiones en proyectos de<br />

desarrollo y conservación. Quito: TNC, WCS, USAID.<br />

González-Andrade, F., L. Roewer, S. Willuweit, D. Sánchez & B. Martínez-Jarreta. 2009. Y-<br />

STR variation among ethnic groups from Ecuador: mestizos, Kichwas, Afro-<br />

Ecuadorians and Waoranis. Forensic Science International: Genetics 3:e83-e91.<br />

High, C. 2006. Oil development, indigenous organisations, and the politics of egalitarianism.<br />

Cambridge Anthropology 26(2):34-46.<br />

Holt, F.L., R.E. Bilsborrow & A.I. Oña. 2004. Demography, household economics, and land<br />

and resource use of five indigenous populations in the northern Ecuadorian<br />

Amazon: a summary of ethnographic research. Occasional Paper. Chapel Hill,<br />

North Carolina: Carolina Population Center.<br />

Kane, J. 1993. With spears from all sides. The New Yorker, September 27, 1993:54-79.<br />

Kimerling, J. 1991. Disregarding environmental law: petroleum development in protected<br />

natural areas and indigenous homelands in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Hastings<br />

International & Comparative Law Review 14:849-903.<br />

Landivar, P., A. Stocks, D. Espín & G. Bryja. 2010. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de la<br />

comunidad de Toñampade. Technical Report #17. Puyo: NAWE, WCS.<br />

Lara, R., E. Pichilingue, R. Narváez & G. Sánchez. 2002a. Monito Ome--Los Huaorani<br />

protegemos nuestro territorio. Quito: Ecociencia, Proyecto SUBIR.<br />

Lara, R., E. Pichilingue, R. Narváez, M. Moreno, G. Sánchez & P. Hernández. 2002b. Plan de<br />

manejo del territorio Huaorani. Quito: Proyecto CARE/SUBIR, EcoCiencia y<br />

ONHAE.<br />

Lu F, C. Gray, R.E. Bilsborrow, C.F. Mena, C.M. Erlien, J. Bremner, A. Barbieri & S.J. Walsh.<br />

2010. Contrasting colonist and indigenous impacts on amazonian forests.<br />

Conservation Biology 24:881-5.<br />

Marchán, J. 2006. Plan Estratégico de Vida de la Nacionalidad Waorani. Puyo: ONHAE,<br />

AMWAE.<br />

Nepstad, D., G. Carvaljo, A.C. Barros, A. Alencar, J.P. Capobianco, J. Bishop, P. Moutinho, P.<br />

Lefebre, U.L. Silva Jr. & E. Prins. 2001. Road Paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the<br />

future of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management 154:395-407.<br />

Nepstad D, S. Schwartzman, B. Bamberger, M. Santilli, D. Ray, P. Schlesinger, P. Lefebvre,<br />

A. Alencar, E. Prinz, G. Fiske & A. Rolla. 2006. Inhibition of Amazon deforestation<br />

and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology 20:65-73.<br />

Peluso, N.L. 1995. Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in<br />

Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 27(4):383-406.<br />

Poole, P. 1998. Indigenous lands and power mapping in the Americas: merging<br />

technologies. Native Americas XV(4):34–43.<br />

Randi Randi. 2003. Diagnostico sociocultural Awá, Cofán y Waorani. Quito: Randi Randi.<br />

Redford, K.E. & S.E. Sanderson. 2000. Extracting humans from nature. Conservation Biology<br />

14(5):1362-1364.<br />

Redford, K. & A.M. Stearman. 1993. Forest-Dwelling Native Amazonians and the<br />

Conservation of Biodiversity: Interests in Common or in Collision? Conservation<br />

Biology 7(2):248-255.<br />

Reed, P. 2011. REDD+ and the indigenous question: a case study from Ecuador. Forests<br />

2:525-549.


Deforestation and Waodani Lands in Ecuador:<br />

Mapping and Demarcation Amidst Shaky Politics<br />

Ricketts, T.H., B. Soares-Filho, G.A.B. da Fonseca, D. Nepstad, A. Pfaff, A. Petsonk, A.<br />

Anderson, D. Boucher, A. Cattaneo, M. Conte, K. Creighton, L. Linden, C. Maretti,<br />

P. Moutinho, R. Ullman & R. Victurine. 2010. Indigenous lands, protected areas,<br />

and slowing climate change. PLoS Biology 8(3):e10000331.<br />

Rival, L. 1992. Huaorani y petroleo. Pp. 125-179 in G. Tassi (ed.). Naufragos del mar verde:<br />

la resistencia de los Huaorani a una integración impuesta. Quito: Abya Yala &<br />

CONFENIAE.<br />

Rival, L. 1999. Prey at the center: resistance and marginality in Amazonia. Pp. 61-79 in: S.<br />

Day, E. Papataxiarchis & M. Stewart (eds.). Lilies of the field: marginal people who<br />

live for the moment. Boulder: Westview Press.<br />

Rival, L. 2000. Marginality with a difference, or how the Huaorani preserve their sharing<br />

relations and naturalize outside powers. Pp. 244-260 in: P.P. Schweitzer, M. Biesele<br />

& R. K. Hitchcock (eds.). Hunters and gatherers in the modern world: conflict,<br />

resistance, and self-determination. New York: Berghahn Books.<br />

Schmidt, P. & M.J. Peterson. 2009. Biodiversity conservation and indigenous management in<br />

the era of self-determination. Conservation Biology 23:1458-1466.<br />

Schwartzman, S., A. Moreira & D. Nepstad. 2000. Rethinking Tropical Forest Conservation:<br />

Perils in Parks. Conservation Biology 14(5):1351-1357.<br />

Soares-Filhoa, B., P. Moutinho, D. Nepstad, A. Anderson, H. Rodriguesa, R. Garcia, L.<br />

Dietzsch, F. Merry, M. Bowman, L. Hissa, R. Silvestrini, and C. Maretti. 2010. Role<br />

of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of<br />

the American Academy of Sciences.<br />

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0913048107.<br />

Stocks, A. 2003. Mapping dreams in Nicaragua’s Bosawas biosphere reserve. Human<br />

Organization 62:65-78.<br />

Stocks, A., B. McMahan & P. Taber. 2007. Indigenous, colonist and government impacts on<br />

Nicaragua’s Bosawas Reserve. Conservation Biology 21:1495–1505.<br />

Stocks, A. & D. Espín. 2010. Mapeo participativo y zonificación de las comunidades de<br />

Guiyedo, Timpoka y Ganketa en el Parque Nacional Yasuní. Technical Report #19.<br />

Puyo: NAWE, WCS.<br />

Stocks, A. & P. Taber. 2011. Ironies of conservation mapping. In K. Offen and J. Dym, eds.<br />

Mapping Latin America (in press). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

Trujillo León, J. 1996. The Quichua and Huaorani peoples and Yasuní National Park,<br />

Ecuador. Pp. 75-92 in: K.H. Redford & J.A. Mansour (eds.). Traditional peoples and<br />

biodiverity conservation in large tropical landscapes. Washington, DC: TNC.<br />

Vallejo, I. & A. Burbano. 2008. Planificación estratégica: NAWE. Technical Report #6. Puyo:<br />

NAWE, WCS.<br />

Villaverde, X., F. Ormaza, V. Marcial & J. P. Jorgensen. 2005. Parque Nacional y Reserva de<br />

Biósfera Yasuní: historia, problemas y perspectivas. Quito: Grupo FEPP, WCS.<br />

Viña, A., F.R. Echavarría & D.C. Rundquist. 2004. Satellite change detection analysis of<br />

deforestation rates and patterns along the Colombia-Ecuador border. Ambio<br />

33(3):118-125.<br />

Wainwright, J. & J. Bryan. 2009. Cartography, territory, property: postcolonial reflections on<br />

indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize. Cultural Geographies<br />

16:153-178.<br />

201


202<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Weber, R., J. Butler & P. Larson. 2000. Indigenous peoples and conservation organisations:<br />

experiences in collaboration. World Wildlife Fund (USA), Washington, D.C.<br />

Yost, J.A. 1979. El desarrollo comunitario y la supervivencia étnica: el caso de los Huaorani,<br />

Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Quito: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. Cuadernos<br />

Etnolingüísticos No. 6. 29 pp.<br />

Yost, J.A. 1981. Twenty years of contact: the mechanisms of change in Wao ("Auca") culture.<br />

Pp. 677-704 in: N.E. Whitten Jr. (ed.). Cultural transformations and ethnicity in<br />

modern Ecuador. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.<br />

Yost, J.A. 1991. People of the forest: the Waorani. Pp. 95-115 in: M. Acosta-Solis (ed.).<br />

Ecuador in the shadow of volcanoes. Quito: Ediciones Libri Mundi.<br />

Ziegler-Otero, L. 2004. Resistance in an Amazonian community: Huaorani organizing<br />

against the global economy. New York: Berghahn Books.


11<br />

Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

1. Introduction<br />

K.P. Chethan, Jayaraman Srinivasan, Kumar Kriti and Kaki Sivaji<br />

TCS Innovation Labs Bangalore, Tata Consultancy Services,<br />

<strong>India</strong><br />

Forests being an indispensable resource play an important role in maintaining the earth's<br />

ecological balance. The major contributors of deforestation are logging off of trees (legal or<br />

illegal), tree theft, forest fire etc. Large scale deforestation has negative impact on the<br />

atmosphere resulting in global warming, flash floods, landslides, drought etc. Due to these<br />

adverse effects, forest management department all over the countries have taken steps for<br />

monitoring the forest to prevent deforestation. Several surveillance techniques have been<br />

employed for monitoring and prevention; they are broadly classified as Ground-based<br />

sensing techniques and Remote sensing techniques.<br />

Surveillance plays an important role in forest management. It had been used in the past and<br />

is still being used for monitoring and information collection. Ground-based techniques<br />

generally include surveillance by on-site security staff and mobile patrols monitoring the<br />

property by water, land and air (Magrath et al., 2007). Some complementary systems such as<br />

Fixed Earth System are also used with observation towers located at strategic points with<br />

specialized personnel for observing and detecting the presence of fire. All these systems are<br />

expensive and time consuming, requiring a lot of resources.<br />

Nowadays, remote sensing technologies are also used like, aerial photographs, automatic<br />

video surveillance, wireless surveillance systems and satellite imagery. Satellite imagery is<br />

very costly for use in monitoring any illegal activity like trespassers, tree theft and<br />

deforestation (if they are able to detect at all). On the other hand, with the technological<br />

advancements in wireless communication, various low power, and low cost, small-sized<br />

sensors nodes are available which can be readily deployed to monitor environment over<br />

vast areas. Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) technology is being used widely for<br />

monitoring and controlling applications. Currently three main wireless standards are used<br />

namely: WiFi, Bluetooth and ZigBee. Amongst them, ZigBee is the most promising standard<br />

owing to its low power consumption and simple networking configuration. Wireless sensor<br />

network based surveillance systems for remote deployment and control are more cost<br />

effective and are easy to deploy at location of interest. They can even reach those areas<br />

where satellite signals are not available. Moreover, they can be configured to monitor large<br />

areas and they have secure mode of data transmission.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>ally, WSNs finds immense application in land management, agriculture<br />

management, lake water quality management, forest fire detection, tree theft prevention and<br />

also in the prevention of deforestation. In addition, WSN system has also been used for<br />

strain monitoring in railway bridges. (Bischoff et al., 2009), developed an event based strain


204<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

monitoring WSN system for railway bridge. They used low power MEMS acceleration sensors<br />

for detecting an approaching train. Whenever this event was detected, strain gauges were<br />

operated and measured data was used for cycle counting based fatigue assessment of steel<br />

bridges. This event based detection was developed to manage the power consumption and<br />

make the system more energy efficient. Moreover, solar rechargeable battery powered base<br />

station was used to increase the system lifetime.<br />

WSN system has also been used for landslide monitoring and prevention. (Rosi et al., 2011)<br />

discussed the implementation and deployment details of a WSN system for landslide<br />

monitoring in Northern Italy Apennines. Six Micaz nodes having a 2 axis accelerometer for<br />

sampling vibrations were used. These vibrations were a result of slope movements caused<br />

by landslides. The data measured by the sensor nodes were routed to the brides and finally<br />

sent to the base station following a predefined static routing table. These examples give a<br />

fairly good idea of the amount of work and research going on in WSN area making them the<br />

most promising technology to use for monitoring and control purpose in diversified fields.<br />

A lot of research has been done using WSN for forest monitoring either for fire prevention<br />

or for monitoring the illegal logging activity. Some researchers have proposed algorithms<br />

for detection and prevention and have simulation results verifying their control. On the<br />

other hand, some have come up with the design, implementation and deployment of the<br />

system. The work on forest monitoring is not limited to fire and deforestation detection and<br />

prevention but also includes preserving and conserving the flora and fauna of the forests. A<br />

brief summary of the work done in this domain is given below.<br />

(Awang & Suhaimi, 2007), developed a WSN based forest monitoring system called<br />

RIMBAMON. This system consisted of sensor nodes deployed in the forest at specific<br />

distances for capturing temperature, light intensity, acoustic, acceleration and magnetic<br />

readings. MICA2 Mote was used for implementation for its long range in ISM band. These<br />

sensors were either mounted on the trunk of the tree at the ground level or kept along the<br />

roadside. The sensors used helped in monitoring any illegal logging activity in addition to<br />

detection of fire in the forest. Temperature and light intensity sensors gave an indication of<br />

both logging activity as well as presence of fire. On the other hand, acoustic sensors gave<br />

more information on logging activity alone owing to the abnormal sound associated with<br />

the usage of machinery, tractor or chainsaw. The system was simulated and tested well to<br />

capture and transmit data to the base station. It displayed the acquired data in form of<br />

graphs, tables and maps to help in taking prompt action. However, the system lacked<br />

remote monitoring through the web, which could be useful in monitoring hostile areas.<br />

(Harvanova et. al., 2011) proposed a Zigbee based WSN system for detection of wood<br />

logging using real time analysis of sounds from surroundings. The WSN system<br />

periodically acquires sound samples, processes it and transmits it to the central server. Tools<br />

which are vastly used for deforestation are chainsaw. There is a characteristic sound<br />

associated with a logging activity. Whenever, the sound samples acquired from the sensors<br />

matches the sound samples of logging tools, a logging activity is detected and the<br />

responsible personnel is notified through an e-mail or a SMS alert.<br />

(Soisoonthorn & Rujipattanapong, 2007), also studied the unique acoustic characteristics of<br />

the chainsaw and used it for detecting the activity of chainsawing leading to deforestation.<br />

The algorithm was based on a limited energy sensor node and combined three techniques<br />

which included adaptive energy threshold, delta pitch detection and energy band ratio in<br />

high frequency range. Since the energy characteristic of chainsaw is quite constant, state


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

machine used was further simplified for detection purpose. They could achieve the<br />

detection accuracy of 90.8% with this method.<br />

(Figueiredo et. al., 2009), studied the communication performance of WSN for preserving<br />

and conserving the flora and fauna of rainforests. A set of experiments were carried out to<br />

assess how data communication is affected by environmental parameters like, forest density,<br />

humidity and extreme temperature variations. It was concluded that communication range<br />

of a WSN system deployed in a dense forest gets reduced by 78% as compared to<br />

deployment in any other environment.<br />

A lot of study has been done on early fire detection and a number of techniques and sensor<br />

combinations have been investigated. Techniques include remote sensing techniques as well<br />

as event detection for wireless sensor networks. (Bahrepour et. al., 2008) presented a survey<br />

on automatic fire detection from a wireless sensor network perspective. The survey included<br />

fire detection techniques for residential areas; for forests and contribution of wireless sensor<br />

networks in early fire detection. Since the sensors used for detection were prone to noise,<br />

multiple sensors were used to reduce the false alarms generated in case of single sensor<br />

usage. Usually temperature sensors are combined with gas concentration sensors for better<br />

fire detection. In this study, it was concluded that in residential areas, ION detectors are<br />

more beneficial for flaming fire detection. On the other hand, photo detectors are more<br />

beneficial for non-flaming fire detection. Fire Weather Index (FWI), which resulted from<br />

several years of forestry research, can be used as promising factor for forest fire detection.<br />

(Lozano & Rodriguez, 2010), designed a WSN based system which monitored temperature<br />

and humidity for early detection of forest fires. Weather conditions especially temperature,<br />

humidity and rainfall determines the degree and speed by which fire spreads in the forest.<br />

The correlation between the various weather elements and flammability of the waste of<br />

branches and trees helps in predicting the risk of fire at any given location. Mesh topology<br />

was used to configure the communication network and temperature and humidity sensors<br />

were used to gather the data from the remote location. Through simulation it was shown<br />

that the system was capable of detecting fire at an early stage thereby, protecting the nature<br />

reserves.<br />

(Zoltan Kovacs et. al., 2010), presented a case study of a simple, low cost WSN system<br />

implementation for forest fire monitoring. Smoke detectors and temperature sensors were<br />

used to detect forest fire. A simple star topology was used to cut down on the computation<br />

and power consumption. (Zhang et. al., 2009), proposed a Zigbee based WSN system for<br />

forest fire detection in real-time so that decision to prevent or extinguish fire can be taken in<br />

real-time. The sensor nodes comprised of humidity, temperature, wind speed, wind<br />

direction, smoke, pressure and other fire monitoring sensors. The data collected by them<br />

was sent to the cluster head which was responsible for data aggregation and transmission.<br />

Network co-ordinators were responsible for network building, access control and other<br />

network management functions. The data was transmitted to the routers which established<br />

local databases and sent the data to the host for monitoring purpose over the internet. Some<br />

important factors related to ad hoc network technology, forest-fire forecasting model and<br />

determination of effective communication distance was discussed.<br />

(Wang et al., 2010), proposed a new wireless network implementation for forest fire<br />

monitoring based on Zigbee and GPRS technology. This work is quite similar to the one<br />

adopted by us in monitoring illegal logging of trees in the forest. This system was capable of<br />

205


206<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

transmitting the data collected by the wireless network to FTP server through GPRS so that<br />

real-time data can be made available to the experts to help in decision making. The hardware<br />

schemes and program flows of the system were given. (Fonte et. al., 2007), designed a low cost<br />

system-on-chip microwave radiometer on silicon for remote sensing of temperature to find<br />

application in fire prevention. A detailed system analysis was carried out by means of<br />

simulations to study its feasibility in civil and environment safeguard applications.<br />

(Gil et. al., 2010), came up with a fire monitoring device which provides visualization<br />

services after gathering GPS and sensor data from the micro-system (quad rotor). The<br />

sensors used were CO2, humidity, fume and temperature. The data was wirelessly<br />

transmitted and displayed on the map using open map API to give information where the<br />

fire broke out. (Hefeeda & Bagheri, 2007), proposed a WSN system for forest fire modelling<br />

and early detection. Forest fire was modelled according to Fire Weather Index (FWI) system<br />

which is considered as one of the most comprehensive forest danger rating systems in North<br />

America. A k-node coverage problem in WSN for forest fire detection was studied and a<br />

approximation algorithm was proposed which had better convergence, promised optimal<br />

number of sensor usage and doubled the network lifetime than other existing algorithms.<br />

Some problems on optimization related to sensor nodes deployment were also explored.<br />

(Al-Turjman et al., 2009), studied the various design factors important for WSN system<br />

deployment especially in harsh environment like coverage, connectivity and lifetime. They<br />

explored the problem of placement of the relay nodes in 3D forest space. They formulated<br />

an optimization problem which focuses on maximizing the network connectivity with a<br />

limit on the number of relay nodes used. They came up with a threshold on a minimum<br />

number of relay nodes used for desired connectivity in harsh environment.<br />

Apart from using WSN for this application, some researchers have explored other<br />

technology also. (Luming et al., 2008), studied and came up with a new technology which<br />

combined the advantages of video monitor and GIS systems for fire prevention. These two<br />

techniques complemented each other well and helped in increasing the accuracy of fire<br />

detection and hence prevention, reducing the false alarm. Also, synchronous tracking of<br />

video monitored areas in GIS of forest resources helped in getting more accurate<br />

information of the land form of the affected area.<br />

Monitoring deforestation is a very complicated process. It becomes even more complicated<br />

with the increasing need of resources. Our work addresses the issue of deforestation<br />

detection and prevention using an event based WSN system. The design and<br />

implementation details of the sensor nodes are given. Mesh routing algorithm is used here<br />

for routing data packets to the sink whenever an event is detected.<br />

Following the brief introduction to the problem being addressed in this chapter, the other<br />

sections are organized as follows: Section 2 discusses the design concept of a WSN setup for<br />

monitoring large space like forests. This includes the advantages and challenges<br />

encountered in deployment of WSN for such an application. Followed by this, Section 3<br />

gives a detailed description of the WSN prototype developed which finds application in the<br />

detection of tree theft, forest fire and deforestation. Section 4 discusses the challenges faced<br />

in the deployment of the proposed prototype. The power requirement of the sensor nodes is<br />

handled by the power management unit which has a provision of harvesting energy from<br />

the surrounding to increase the network deployment lifetime. The various 'energy<br />

harvesting' techniques which can be used for recharging the sensor nodes are discussed in


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Section 5. Finally, we have Section 6 giving the summary and important conclusions of the<br />

work discussed.<br />

2. Design concept of WSN system for forest monitoring<br />

Designing, deploying, and evaluating a novel wireless systems at a large scale requires<br />

substantial effort. One of the major applications of wireless sensor networks is in event<br />

detection. Here, a sensor network is monitoring certain phenomenon and the respective<br />

communication node needs to get triggered on occurrence of a certain event. Subsequently<br />

the event needs to be reported to the sink node as quickly as possible. The communication<br />

nodes can be sleeping for most of the time to conserve power since most of the events are<br />

rare in nature. But there must be a mechanism to wake them up for quick event<br />

transmission through appropriate synchronization. Some of the prominent applications of<br />

this category are detection of fire, intrusion, earth quake, landslide, theft of assets and other<br />

surveillance applications. However, it is still a great challenge to design a wireless sensor<br />

network system for rare event detection; where network lifetime and robustness is a major<br />

concern. Some of the recent developments include campus-wide and community-wide<br />

wireless mesh networks (Bicket et al., 2005; UCSD Active Campus; Camp et al., 2006), and<br />

real-world sensor network deployments in environments as diverse as forests, active<br />

volcanoes, and bridges. WSN system design for forest monitoring involves:<br />

Sensors<br />

Design of low power wireless communication module<br />

Simulation and implementation of energy efficient protocol<br />

Deployment strategies<br />

Middleware<br />

2.1 Sensors<br />

One of the main goals of sensor network is to provide accurate information about a<br />

sensing field for an extended period of time. This requires collecting measurements from<br />

as many sensors as possible to have a better view of the sensor surroundings. However,<br />

due to energy limitations and to prolong the network lifetime, the number of active<br />

sensors should be kept to a minimum. To resolve this conflict of interest, sensor selection<br />

schemes are used. The sensor selection problem can be defined as follows: Given a set of<br />

sensors S = {S1. . . Sn}, we need to determine the “best subset” S_ of k sensors to satisfy the<br />

requirements of one or multiple missions. The “best subset” is one which achieves the<br />

required accuracy of information with respect to a task while meeting the energy<br />

constraints of the sensors. So, we have two conflicting goals: (1) to collect information of<br />

high accuracy and (2) to lower the cost of operation. This trade-off is usually modelled<br />

using the notions of utility and cost:<br />

Utility: accuracy of the gathered information and its usefulness to a mission.<br />

Cost: These consist mainly of energy expended activating and operating the sensors which is<br />

directly proportional to number of selected sensors k. Another cost factor that can be<br />

considered is the risk of detecting active sensors especially if wireless communication is<br />

used. Table 1 shows the selection of sensors for different hazards<br />

207


208<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Hazard Application Sensor Application<br />

Observation Acceleration<br />

Experiment Acceleration strain<br />

Earthquake/wind Structural control Acceleration<br />

Health monitoring Acceleration/strain/Displacement<br />

Damage detection Acceleration/strain/Displacement<br />

Fire detection Temperature/Smoke/Acoustic<br />

Fire<br />

Gas leak detection<br />

Alarm ,warning<br />

Olfactory<br />

Sounder<br />

Evacuation control Temperature/Smoke/Acoustic/Light<br />

Crime<br />

Surveillance<br />

Security alert<br />

Acceleration/Light/Acoustic/Camera<br />

Sounder<br />

Table 1. Different Sensors used for Sensing Different Hazards<br />

2.2 Design of low power wireless communication module<br />

Power Management is the major challenge in wireless sensor network design. Sensor nodes<br />

of the WSNs are battery powered due to their nature of application and deployment<br />

requirement. However, batteries life time is limited life which affects the performance of the<br />

WSN and it needs replacement from time to time. To overcome this issue, lifetime of the<br />

battery can be extended by adopting the following approaches:<br />

1. Design of low power sensor nodes<br />

2. Energy harvesting<br />

Many applications require periodic monitoring rather than continuous monitoring of<br />

elements of interest. For such applications, the system need not be in awake state (high<br />

power consumption) all the time; instead it can be in sleep state (low power consumption)<br />

till it is required to monitor the elements of interest. This can lead to considerable reduction<br />

in power consumption. Many low power chipsets are now available which can be<br />

configured for such an application.<br />

Additionally, harvesting energy from the surrounding can play a significant role in improving<br />

the self sustainability of the WSN system. Once WSN is deployed it is expected to work<br />

continuously and autonomously with minimum or no human intervention. Therefore there is<br />

a need for sensor nodes to be self sufficient in terms of energy consumption. Energy harvesting<br />

can be performed from sources like solar, vibration, RF etc for recharging the sensor nodes<br />

batteries, thereby increasing their lifetime. The different energy harvesting techniques which<br />

can be employed depends on the location of WSN deployment. Further, the different<br />

techniques and their implementation is discussed in Section 5.<br />

2.3 Protocol section and simulation<br />

In WSN, most sensor networks are application specific and have different requirements. On<br />

the other hand the sensor nodes have a limited transmission range, processing and storage<br />

capabilities, energy resources as well. The routing protocols for wireless sensor networks are<br />

responsible for maintaining the routes in the network and have to ensure reliable multi-hop<br />

communication under these conditions. In consequence, all or part of the above mentioned<br />

design objectives need to be considered in the design of sensor network protocol. (Singh et<br />

al., 2010) provided a survey on challenges involved in the design of protocols for WSN.<br />

Below is the list of requirements to be considered in order to design and develop a good<br />

quality application protocol for WSN.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Small node size<br />

Low node cost<br />

Low power consumption<br />

Scalability<br />

Reliability<br />

Self-configurability<br />

Adaptability<br />

Channel utilization<br />

Fault tolerance<br />

Security<br />

QoS support<br />

Sensor locations<br />

Limited hardware resources<br />

Massive and random node deployment<br />

Network characteristics and unreliable environment<br />

Data aggregation<br />

Diverse sensing application requirements<br />

2.4 Middle ware<br />

As WSN vision evolves, multiple paradigms co-exist as single, multiple and internet-scale<br />

sensor networks. A diversity of approaches has been proposed to deal with the multitude of<br />

WSN application requirements. Current systems do not address most of these requirements<br />

adequately; especially the aspects like support for security, trust, transparency, mobility,<br />

and heterogeneity.<br />

Middleware for sensor networks is an emerging and very promising research area. Most of<br />

the reported works on sensor middleware are at an early stage, focusing on developing<br />

algorithms and components for data aggregation, self organization, , network service<br />

discovery, routing, synchronization, optimization etc to build higher level of service<br />

structures. They often lack attention for integrating these algorithms and components into a<br />

generic middleware architecture, and for helping application developers to compose a<br />

system that exactly matches their requirements. There are still few widely accepted software<br />

standards for middleware. SensorML (Sensor Model Language) for service discovery and<br />

Global Sensor Networks (GSN) (Middleware for Sensor Networks) or integrating virtual<br />

sensors have the potential for adoption. We also see the relevance of context aware<br />

computing technologies (Ontologies and expert systems) in creating a semantic layer for<br />

WSN applications. However, in this chapter the implementation was performed in the<br />

hardware without any separate OS.<br />

Microsoft has a web based visualization service called Sense Map (SensorMap) which can be<br />

used to host and share sensor data. Google Maps, Google Earth, Virtual Earth, are also<br />

provided as interfaces to the final user. In addition to computers, PDA (Personal Digital<br />

Assistant) and mobile phones can be used to monitor the data and subscribe to alert<br />

services. Also it will be interesting to see how virtual reality environments can provide<br />

effective visualization environment for WSN applications. WSN characteristics require a<br />

specific approach for middleware development that goes beyond dealing with resource<br />

constraints. It involves an end-to-end approach that handles the WSN as a whole rather than<br />

a group of individual nodes. This implies considerable consequences for typical middleware<br />

209


210<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

services such as mobility, coordination, service discovery, security, data aggregation, quality<br />

of service, handling hardware heterogeneity, handling communication errors, scalability,<br />

and network organization. Good architectures are needed to integrate new sensor services<br />

to integrate safely with legacy systems; enhanced programming models, event propagation<br />

models, and data models to accommodate the requirements of sensor applications and<br />

services; and inventive design. There is no single middleware existing till date which<br />

addresses all these requirements.<br />

2.5 Deployment<br />

In general, deployment establishes an association of sensor nodes with objects, creatures, or<br />

places in order to augment them with information-processing capabilities. Deployment can<br />

be as diverse as establishing one-to-one relationships by attaching sensor nodes to specific<br />

items to be monitored (Przydatek et al., 2003), covering an area with locomotive sensor<br />

nodes (Bulusu et al., 2004), or throwing nodes from an aircraft into an area of interest (Karlof<br />

& Wagner, 2003). Due to their large number, nodes have to operate unattended after<br />

deployment. Once a sufficient number of nodes have been deployed, the sensor network can<br />

be used to fulfil its task. This task can be issued by an external entity connected to the sensor<br />

network.<br />

3. Proof of Concept (PoC) for forest monitoring<br />

The main objective of our system is to monitor tree theft/fire in the forest and alert using an<br />

event based wireless sensor network. In forest monitoring application, events like tree theft,<br />

fire etc. occur rarely, so in our implementation, the communication nodes are kept in sleep<br />

mode (until any event is detected) to cut down on the power consumption. Whenever an<br />

event is detected by sensor, it triggers the communication nodes. Subsequently, the event is<br />

reported to the sink node as quickly as possible and an alert is generated. In addition to<br />

event based monitoring, our system incorporates energy harvesting technique to power the<br />

sensor nodes and for carrying out other power management related tasks. The detailed<br />

description of the design and implementation of the proposed system is given below.<br />

3.1 Communication node design<br />

This section describes the sensor node architecture which has been designed and developed<br />

for the low power application stated above. Fig. 1 shows the functional block diagram of the<br />

sensor node developed for forest monitoring. The sensor node architecture mainly consists<br />

of a SOC (system-on-chip) for data collection, processing, networking and controlling;<br />

sensors for event detection; power supply for meeting the power requirements of the sensor<br />

node and RF energy harvester system for harvesting energy from RF. The hardware details<br />

of the various components of the sensor node are described below.<br />

3.1.1 SOC (System-on-Chip)<br />

MC13213 system on chip (SOC) from Freescale Semiconductor has been used for this<br />

implementation. The interrupt which is generated by the Key Board Interrupt (KBI) has been<br />

used to wake up the controller from the sleep mode. Whenever SOC receives an interrupt to<br />

KBI from the tilt/temperature sensor, it sends low signal on the corresponding KBI and wakes<br />

up the controller which starts its service from the corresponding service routine.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Fig. 1. Functional Block Diagram of the Sensor Node developed for Forest Monitoring<br />

On the other hand, when the neighbor nodes want to send the data, it first sends the RF<br />

signal and then sends the data. Received RF signal will interrupt the node and energy<br />

storage will occur based on signal threshold. When RF signal is within the predefined<br />

thresholds, threshold circuit sends an active low signal to KBI. KBI wake up the controller<br />

and start the corresponding service routine to listen its neighbour. If the received RF energy<br />

is out of these two thresholds, it activates the energy harvest mode.<br />

Energy of RF signal =Vf<br />

if TH1


212<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

using rechargeable alkaline battery (two 1.5V cells in series). Since our system is an event<br />

based system, the system spends most of the time in sleep mode (consuming uAmps of<br />

current), so the current consumption of this system is very low. Therefore, once the battery<br />

is fully charged the system runs for minimum six months. In addition to that, RF energy<br />

harvesting technique is implemented in this system to recharge battery, which further<br />

increases the sensor network lifetime. RF energy is extracted from RF transmitters/senders<br />

specially designed for this purpose. Typically, RF senders are required for every 50 nodes,<br />

whose job is to transmit the RF signal with high power so that the nodes which receive the<br />

signal with high power will recharge their battery. Such RF sender is required to run for one<br />

or two days once in six months.<br />

RF harvesting technology can be used for multiple frequencies and can generate standard or<br />

custom output voltages. Batteries or any other energy storage devices can be recharged<br />

easily either in close proximity or remotely. In addition, some low power devices can be<br />

directly driven from the received RF power. In our application, harvester system for RF<br />

consists of Power harvester P1100 module from Powercast (Power harvester P1100 Module<br />

Datasheet), which converts received RF energy into DC power with high efficiency. With the<br />

help of a threshold circuit, this chip is used for two purpose here, one for waking up the<br />

sensor node and other for recharging the battery. When any neighbour node wishes to<br />

transmit data, it first sends the RF energy for approx.10 seconds. This is received by<br />

surrounding nodes and goes through P1100 module to get converted into DC power. The<br />

converted DC power is fed to the threshold circuit which decides whether the RF signal<br />

received is to wake up the controller or to recharge the battery. The decision depends<br />

entirely on the power available at the output of P1100 module and the threshold limits<br />

adopted. Depending on the decision, a KBI interrupt is generated if it is required to wake up<br />

the neighbouring nodes for data transmission.<br />

3.2 Network design architecture<br />

One of the important aspects of the network design is the communication of data among the<br />

sensor nodes. Therefore, it is highly necessary to design efficient routing algorithm<br />

considering multiple constraints that is inevitable in wireless environment. There are two<br />

types of routing possible based on the functionality of the nodes in the network namely, flat<br />

routing and hierarchical routing. In hierarchical routing, the whole network is divided into<br />

multiple hierarchies. Each node has different functionality with respect to the level of<br />

hierarchy. Zigbee routing is one such hierarchical routing protocol where the nodes are<br />

organized in a hierarchical manner. However, in flat routing protocol, also known as mesh<br />

routing protocol, all the nodes in the network are organized in the same hierarchy i.e. all<br />

nodes in the network have the same hardware and functional properties. Directed diffusion<br />

is one example of this type of routing. In this study, we propose a mesh routing protocol<br />

system suitable for monitoring the environment, wherein the nodes in the network are in<br />

the same hierarchy. The proposed protocol for this study is an event based protocol, where<br />

the nodes generate data corresponding to the event occurred and communicates it to the<br />

sink. The protocol has two phases: Configuration Phase and Routing Phase.<br />

Configuration Phase: In this phase, the whole network is in wake up state. The sink node<br />

sends the CONFIG packet which traverses through the network in multiple hops. All the<br />

nodes receive the CONFIG packet and construct the routing table. Routing table is used to<br />

route the data packets towards the sink node. Once the network is configured, the sink<br />

broadcasts the sleep packet throughout the network and all the nodes go to sleep mode.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Routing Phase: In this phase, an event detected in the vicinity of the sensor, wakes up the<br />

sensor node and records the sensed data at the node. This node then transmits a beacon<br />

signal for a pre-defined period of time to wake up the sensor nodes within its range<br />

(neighbours). The node selects the upstream node (towards the sink) using routing table to<br />

forward the data packet. A similar procedure is carried out on the selected upstream nodes<br />

to route the data packets to the sink node. The nodes enter back into sleep mode after a<br />

specified period of time.<br />

3.3 Visualization and monitoring<br />

A tool for monitoring and visualization of the forest related events was developed. It<br />

supported major features required for middleware for many practical applications involving<br />

sensor data collection, visualization and monitoring. The developed framework had two<br />

flavours. The first one is a PC based standalone tool, named as Wi-SenseScape developed in<br />

Java. It has a graphical user interface (GUI) supporting commands for network visualization<br />

including topology, node parameters, and sensor data. The GUI supports the specification of<br />

background and foreground image files to be displayed to adapt to various application<br />

scenarios. Events can be defined by specifying a mathematical expression based on the<br />

sensor parameters. This expression will be evaluated in real-time whenever the dependent<br />

parameter changes. Once an event is detected, there is a facility in this tool to link an action<br />

to a specific event based on user's discretion.<br />

The second one is a web based visualization system, named as Web-SenseScape (shown in<br />

Fig. 2), which integrates Google maps and other map sources as geographical reference<br />

layers. Markers are used for identifying the sensor node deployment which displays current<br />

details on mouse click. The WSN is represented in XML in a hierarchical structure. The<br />

structure is Network -> Clusters-> Nodes-> Sensors. A text based structure view is<br />

incorporated to enable the expandable tree visualization. The desired Sensor-ID could be<br />

selected to view the sensor data in text format or as a time series plot.<br />

Fig. 2. Web based WSN Monitoring and Visualization<br />

Specific to forest monitoring, this can be loaded with pre-defined blue-print of the forest which<br />

is to be monitored. An alert window provides real-time display of events that got triggered<br />

213


214<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

based on the events defined. Appropriate audio-visual messaging or alarms can be invoked on<br />

the occurrence of specific events. For example, whenever tree falls it shows which tree has<br />

fallen by highlighting the tree and proper audio message to take necessary action. This<br />

framework is being extended to incorporate visualization of multiple data types and sources<br />

including cameras, microphones, GPS (Global Positioning System), medical sensors etc.<br />

represented with SensorML. Network management functionality is also being incorporated to<br />

enable interactions with the sensor nodes deployed in the field. The middleware architecture<br />

has been developed keeping in view of the flexibility, scalability and portability required for<br />

supporting multiple networking standards, applications and platforms. The next section<br />

demonstrates the application in the deployment scenario.<br />

3.4 Deployment of WSN for forest monitoring<br />

The typical setup of the forest monitoring application is shown in Fig. 3. Few wireless nodes<br />

(say N1 to N10) which are responsible for sensing the desired physical entities and<br />

communicating this information are deployed in the forest. The information gathered by the<br />

nodes is transferred to their upstream routers. One Base Station (BS) is used which gathers<br />

the information from the routers. This BS is in turn connected to host system through<br />

wireless connection which finally processes the information received from the BS and takes<br />

appropriate decision.<br />

Fig. 3. Demonstration Scenario of detecting a Fallen Tree using WSN<br />

In our application, the wireless sensor nodes are mounted on each tree in order to protect the<br />

tree from critical events like theft, fire etc. Wireless T-mote is the name given to each node. Few<br />

T-motes were attached to the tree models. It formed a simple dynamic tree network topology<br />

to route packets to the host system. The fall detection approach adopted by us can be<br />

explained with the help of Fig. 3. As can been seen from the figure, fall event is detected on<br />

N10 which may be generated in case of tree theft. When the tree is falling the tilt sensor<br />

generates the event and wakes up the node. This node transmits a beacon signal for a predefined<br />

period of time to wake up the sensor nodes within its range. A dynamic routing path<br />

created in the routing phase is used to send this message to the base station which is connected<br />

to the host system. In this example, routing path created via Node 8, 6, 4, 2, 1 is used for alert<br />

sending. Host system running the Wi-Sensescape application, provides services like: sensor<br />

data visualization and analysis, map of the network topology, alarm services, network analysis


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

and filtration of sensor data. This helps in studying and analyzing the activities and behaviour<br />

of the WSN deployed for monitoring purpose.<br />

3.5 Results and discussions<br />

This section discusses the important results and observations of the proposed system. In this<br />

work we have considered three scenario to calculate the power consumption of the sensor<br />

node, they are: (a)when there is no event, (b)there is event from the sensor (tilt<br />

sensor/temperature ) and (c) there is event from the neighbor to forward the data. After the<br />

event occurs, it wakes up the SOC and starts the operation. The SOC‘s current consumption<br />

is typically around 50mA, it continues till the communication is completed (generally it<br />

takes 3 to 4 seconds to complete its operation) and then it goes to sleep mode. Therefore,<br />

once the event occurs, the battery life is reduced by ~6 hours from the overall life of the<br />

battery. Table 2 shows the power consumed by the mote when there is no event.<br />

Components Mode of Operation Average Current Drawn<br />

Threshold circuit Active 100 A<br />

SOC Sleep 10 A<br />

Leakage - 15 A<br />

Total current required by the sensor node<br />

125 A<br />

Power required = 3V * Total current<br />

375W Table 2. Power Calculation with No Event<br />

Battery Capacitor( BC) 2000mA<br />

Total hours 16000<br />

Battery Drain of Usage 125A<br />

Total hours( TH)<br />

16000<br />

Total days 2years<br />

Hours of Usage per day 24<br />

Routing Protocol: The simulation of the routing protocol has been performed in NS-2 ver 2.32<br />

platform. We choose the amount of delay to analyze the performance of the protocol.<br />

Average Delay measures the average one-way latency observed between transmitting<br />

information from the source and being received by the sink. We study this metric as the<br />

function of the sensor network size. We generated variety of sensor network scenarios with<br />

different network sizes to study the performance of the routing protocol as a function of<br />

network size. In every experiment we study the performance with 10 different sensor<br />

network scenarios with the network size ranging from 50 to 150 nodes with the increment of<br />

25 nodes. We perform the simulation by keeping the network density constant of about 100<br />

nodes/m 2 throughout the experiment. We chose the transmission range of the nodes to be<br />

10m. The other sensor network fields are generated randomly thereby keeping the node<br />

density constant. We used the default 802.15.4 MAC and physical layer stack provided by<br />

the NS-2. We carried out the experiment by making a single sink and single source node<br />

participate in the event generation. Finally, we averaged the results over 10 different<br />

generated sensor network scenarios. Fig. 4 shows the graph of average delay for the<br />

simulation scenarios discussed above. The simulation was carried out for two different cases<br />

215


216<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

where in case 1, the network is in wake-up mode throughout the simulation period. In this<br />

case, it is not necessary to use the RF signal to wake up the node. In case 2, the network is in<br />

sleep mode, where an event wakes up the sensor node and eventually intermediate nodes<br />

are woken up by the RF signal. We simulated this case by transmitting the RF signal<br />

continuously for a period of 1sec to wake up the nodes. As observed in case 1, the data<br />

packet reaches the sink node within negligible period as there is no overhead of waking up<br />

the nodes. But in case 2, as the number of hops to reach the sink increases, it takes a longer<br />

duration for a data packet to reach to sink as it includes the delay of wakening the nodes.<br />

Therefore, we concluded that the average delay is purely proportional to the number of hops,<br />

which in turn is dependent on the distance between the sink and event generating source<br />

node. The major advantage of using this protocol in relaxed latency constrained application is<br />

the amount of energy saved since the network is in sleep mode till an event occurs.<br />

Fig. 4. Latency Time v/s Network Size<br />

4. Deployment challenges<br />

Wireless Sensor Network is a very promising technology for monitoring and controlling<br />

large, remote and hostile areas. They are finding extensive application in the fields of home,<br />

industry, healthcare, agriculture and environment. Some of the reasons of its popularity are<br />

discussed below. The sensor nodes can acquire and analyze the measured data collected<br />

over vast distributed areas using multi-hop communication at lower wiring cost. Moreover,<br />

they can be deployed very quickly and easily without requiring any pre-existing<br />

infrastructure. They can even be integrated with existing external instruments in hostile<br />

areas to help collect, analyze and transmit data to the base station for control action. Lot of<br />

research is also going on in making the sensor nodes more energy efficient thereby<br />

increasing the lifetime of network deployment.<br />

Although WSN is very useful technology for precise monitoring of large, remote and hostile<br />

areas, it suffers from some disadvantages. Researchers have now found the difference<br />

between the predicted and observed behaviour of the wireless sensor networks after<br />

deployment in the field. Some of the constraints and challenges involved in designing a<br />

WSN based system for any application are:


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Optimizing the size, power, cost and their associated tradeoffs<br />

Selection of network protocols that account for key realities in wireless communication<br />

Selection of real-time routing protocol (e.g RAP protocol, SPEED protocol)<br />

Selection of sensor network with limited processor bandwidth and less memory<br />

Improvement of communication range (Wark et al., 2008)<br />

Design of sensor network with low power consumption for long term deployment.<br />

Much of the current research focuses on how to provide full or partial sensing coverage<br />

in the context of energy conservation. In such an approach, nodes are put into a<br />

dormant state as long as their neighbours can provide sensing coverage for them. In<br />

addition, attention has been drawn towards event based systems which account for<br />

power consumption.<br />

Selection of optimum OS for middleware is a critical aspect of WSN.<br />

Design for security: Sensor nodes are often deployed in accessible areas, presenting a<br />

risk of physical attacks. The key challenges are establishment, secrecy and<br />

authentication, privacy, robustness to denial-of-service attacks, secure routing, and<br />

node capture.<br />

5. Energy harvesting techniques<br />

WSN nodes being battery powered are designed to be energy efficient so as to maximize the<br />

lifetime of deployment. Apart from the hardware design, substantial research has been done<br />

on designing energy-efficient networking protocols to maximize the lifetime of WSNs (Seah<br />

et. al., 2009, 2010). One of the major problems faced by WSNs is the lack of a reliable energy<br />

source. Most of the WSNs which are deployed are (primary) battery powered and they need<br />

replacement from time to time. Battery replacement might not be practically possible in<br />

many situations especially where the sensor nodes are embedded in structures and need to<br />

be installed for long duration so, there is a need of using rechargeable batteries which can be<br />

charged from time-to-time thus, continuously delivering power to the sensor nodes. The<br />

batteries can be charged from the mains but that would incur additional cost of wiring and<br />

cabling for each sensor node which might not be practically feasible. Therefore, different<br />

energy harvesting techniques are adopted to charge the batteries and make the nodes self<br />

sustainable.<br />

Since the WSN nodes require low power, micro-scale energy harvesting techniques are<br />

used to extract power at low levels from the surroundings. Micro-scale energy harvesting<br />

systems are now coming up for producing self sustaining low power electronics which no<br />

longer depend on battery for their operation. These systems are capable of extracting<br />

milli-watts of power from sources like light energy, vibration energy, RF and thermal<br />

energy. Harnessing energy from these sources has always been a challenge as these<br />

sources tends to be intermittent and unregulated although being abundantly available.<br />

The energy which is extracted from these sources can be stored in a capacitor, super<br />

capacitor, or battery. (Kompis & Aliwell, 2008), gave a review of the different energy<br />

harvesting technologies that could be used for remote and wireless sensing along with the<br />

limitations associated with the energy sources. Table 3 summarizes the various sources<br />

used for micro-scale energy harvesting along with the power estimate which can be<br />

extracted from them (Raju, 2008).<br />

217


218<br />

Energy Source Harvested Power Estimate<br />

Light (photovoltaic) 10uW-10mW/cm2<br />

Vibration/Motion 4uW-100uW/cm2<br />

Temperature difference 25uW-10mW/cm2<br />

RF 0.1uW-1uW/cm2<br />

Table 3. Energy Sources and their Harvested Power Estimate<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

As seen from the table, light (photovoltaic), thermal and vibration/motion energy seem to<br />

be more promising sources for low power applications. On the other hand, energy harvested<br />

from RF is very small and is still under the development stage but it finds considerable<br />

application in wireless power transmission esp. for powering low power Wireless Sensor<br />

Networks (WSNs). We have used RF energy harvesting technique in our prototype. The<br />

choice of the energy source for a particular application largely depends on the location of<br />

deployment. This section describes two energy harvesting techniques which could be<br />

employed for powering WSN nodes, these are: solar energy harvesting and RF energy<br />

harvesting.<br />

5.1 Photovoltaic harvesting system<br />

In this method, ambient light energy is harnessed and converted into electrical energy with<br />

the help of solar cells. Solar cells are essentially semiconductor junctions. Solar cells work on<br />

the photovoltaic effect in which, the light incident on the solar cell generates electron-hole<br />

pairs on both sides of the junction, the generated electrons and hole then diffuse in the<br />

junction and are swept away by the electric field thereby, generating current. The<br />

conversion efficiency of the solar cells is quite low ~10-20%. Fig. 5 shows the general<br />

structure of a solar cell. The power output of the solar cell is DC and so can be directly used<br />

to power DC loads or can be used for battery charging applications. They can even be used<br />

to power AC loads with the help of an inverter. In addition to solar energy, with recent<br />

advancements, a large range of low power solar cells are now available which are capable of<br />

working in indoor environment i.e. under a fluorescent source.<br />

Load<br />

front<br />

contact<br />

Fig. 5. General Structure of a Solar cell<br />

Light (solar radiation)<br />

Anti-reflecting coating<br />

electron-hole pair<br />

rear<br />

contact<br />

n-type<br />

p-type<br />

Emitter<br />

Base<br />

Advantages: clean source, requires less maintenance, noise-less operation, flexible in<br />

configuration i.e. it can be easily connected in series or in parallel combination depending<br />

on the power requirement.<br />

Disadvantages: power extracted is expensive due to high initial investment and low<br />

conversion efficiency, toxic chemicals like, cadmium and arsenic are used in the production


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

of solar cells which adversely impacts the environment, intermittent nature of the source in<br />

terms of power output.<br />

Applications: low power solar cells find extensive application in calculators, portable lamps,<br />

watches, battery chargers, remote telemetry and communication.<br />

5.2 RF Energy harvesting system<br />

RF energy harvesting is the process by which energy is derived from external RF sources,<br />

(e.g., FM, TV Towers, Wi-Fi, Cell towers and Mobile phones etc.) captured and stored for<br />

different applications like in Wireless Sensor Networks(Seah et al., 2009, 2010) and Wearable<br />

electronics. In this method, RF energy harvesting receivers convert ambient energy (i.e.<br />

surrounding RF energy) into electricity. Receiver circuit consist of a rectenna i.e. a special<br />

type of antenna which directly converts RF energy into useful DC electricity (Mohmmed et<br />

al., 2010) as shown in Fig. 6. In this case also, the power output is DC so it can be used to<br />

power DC loads or for battery charging applications.<br />

Fig. 6. General Block Diagram of RF Energy Harvesting Receiver System<br />

Advantages: Power can be transferred to remote locations where wired power is not possible,<br />

controllable, and predictable. Power can even be transferred over long distances by proper<br />

system design.<br />

Disadvantages: The amount of ambient energy captured is very small and irregular, so it can<br />

be used for powering very low power devices.<br />

Applications: wireless sensor network, consumer electronics, industrial and transportation.<br />

5.3 Photovoltaic harvesting system and its application in WSN<br />

This section describes the solar photovoltaic harvesting system for low power application<br />

with the main focus being their application in WSNs. Nowadays, ultra low power solar cells<br />

are extensively finding applications in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) deployed<br />

outdoors as well as indoors(Hande et al., 2007). The next sub-section describes the<br />

commercially available low power solar cells which can be used for such an application.<br />

5.3.1 Solar cells (photovoltaic) for WSN<br />

Solar photovoltaics are more popular in high power applications due to the fact that the<br />

high cost of the PV panel can be supported by such applications. However, with<br />

technological advancements, several low cost solar cells are now commercially available<br />

which can be used for WSN application esp. in industrial and hospital environment where<br />

indoor lights are operational continuously. Solar cells are available in crystalline silicon, thin<br />

219


220<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

film and many other varieties with a trade off between cost and efficiency. Solar cells are<br />

available for illumination levels starting from 200 lux (under a fluorescent source) to<br />

1000W/m 2 (under 1.5 solar spectrum). Typical voltage and current at maximum power point<br />

range between 1.2V-16V and 4uA-85mA respectively under different illumination<br />

conditions. The voltage per cell is low, so a number of cells are connected in series (stack)<br />

depending on the voltage requirement of the sensor node. The current requirement is met<br />

by connecting several such stacks in parallel. The overall cell configuration, acting as a<br />

single energy source can then be directly connected to the electronic device or through a<br />

charge storage device (like super capacitor, NiCad, NiMH, or Li rechargeable batteries) with<br />

charge controller system which limits overcharging of the batteries.<br />

5.3.2 MPPT for maximum utilization of the source<br />

The solar cell output is significantly affected by changes in the irradiation and temperature<br />

levels. Fig. 7 shows the current-voltage and power-voltage characteristic of the solar cell at<br />

particular irradiation and temperature level (Kumar, 2010). Since the current-voltage<br />

characteristic of a PV cell is non-linear, for a particular irradiation and temperature, there is<br />

a unique point on the power-voltage characteristic at which the photovoltaic power is<br />

maximum. This point is termed as the Maximum Power Point (MPP). The power, voltage<br />

and current corresponding to this point are referred to as PMPP (power at maximum power<br />

point), VMPP (voltage at maximum power point) and IMPP (power at maximum power point)<br />

respectively. As the irradiation level changes, the power output of the PV system changes,<br />

which in turn, changes the MPP. Fig. 8 shows how the MPP points changes under different<br />

irradiation levels.<br />

It is desirable to make the solar cell operate at MPP so that the source is utilized efficiently at<br />

all the times. This is made possible interfacing the solar cell with power electronic converter<br />

working as a Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) incorporating one of the MPPT<br />

schemes. Various MPPT schemes for solar photovoltaic systems have been reported in<br />

literature (Faranda & Leva, 2008; Hohm & Ropp, 2000) with respect to their tracking speed<br />

and accuracy.<br />

Power and Current<br />

Current curve<br />

IMPP<br />

PMPP<br />

Voltage<br />

Power curve<br />

VMPP<br />

MPP<br />

Fig. 7. Current-Voltage and Power-Voltage Characteristics of the Solar Cell


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Current<br />

Irradiation<br />

level<br />

Voltage<br />

MPPs<br />

Fig. 8. Variation of MPP with the Variation in the Irradiation<br />

5.3.3 Solar photovoltaic system for WSN application<br />

Designing a power supply that involves, generation, storage and conversion is very<br />

challenging. A lot of problems are encountered both at the design level as well as at the<br />

implementation level and various solutions have been given by people to solve this problem<br />

(Mahlknecht & Roetzer, 2005). The solar photovoltaic harvester requirements change<br />

depending on the application at hand. A number of factors govern the power being<br />

delivered by the solar cell. Since they are employed to power WSNs deployed outdoors, the<br />

placement of sensors is one of the factors which play a major role. Best compromise of the<br />

placement position should be identified between the best illumination and location<br />

requirement. It should be ensured that the mounting place is not shadowed by the other<br />

objects and the place is sufficiently illuminated. Apart from the placement aspect, the<br />

radiation pattern of the location needs to be studied as it helps in the sizing of solar cell<br />

arrangement.<br />

Incident<br />

radiation<br />

Solar<br />

Cell<br />

Power<br />

Management<br />

Storage<br />

Device<br />

Micro-controller<br />

Sensor 1 Sensor n<br />

Sensor Node<br />

Radio<br />

Fig. 9. Basic Block Diagram of a Solar Powered Wireless Sensor Node<br />

221<br />

Communication<br />

Antenna<br />

The basic block diagram of solar powered wireless sensor node is given in Fig. 9. It typically<br />

consists of a power management unit, controller, sensors and radio transceiver. The power<br />

management unit comprises of the solar cell configuration (series/ parallel combination)<br />

and a storage element (capacitor/battery). The sizing of the solar cell configuration is done<br />

based on the power requirement of the wireless sensor node (RF Monolithics Application<br />

Note M1002, 2010). The storage element can be a super capacitor or battery or a combination<br />

of both with super capacitor providing the peak current and battery acting as the main backup<br />

reservoir. Super capacitors are large capacitors available in the range of 50-100 Farad


222<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

with operating voltage of 2.6V. Several of these can be stacked up in series/parallel<br />

combination to supply the peak power demand. There are four types of rechargeable<br />

batteries which can be for this application, these are: Lead Acid, Nickel Cadmium, Nickel<br />

Metal Hydride and Lithium Ion. Of all these, Lithium Ion battery is most preferred to power<br />

WSNs because of its operating voltage of 3.6V. Lead Acid and Nickel Cadmium battery<br />

although being cheap and easily available are not popular due to increasing environment<br />

concerns about the lead and cadmium content.<br />

The next block is the controller unit which processes the data obtained from the sensors<br />

connected to it and transmits the information using the radio transceiver. Some<br />

configurations might include MPPT device to effectively utilize the PV source. MPPT is<br />

popular in high power applications of solar photovoltaic where huge amount of energy is<br />

extracted. However, in low power applications, MPPT might add to power consumption<br />

and fail to be useful. Therefore, for low power applications demanding a constant output,<br />

the solar cell is interfaced with a power electronic converter. Power electronic converter<br />

works as a regulator/charge controller thereby helping the solar cell in meeting the constant<br />

load demand/charging the batteries. To conserve energy, WSNs operate in sleep mode,<br />

waking up at regular intervals to acquire process and transmit the sensor data to its<br />

neighboring devices/master system for decision making. The amount of current consumed<br />

by them in the sleep mode and wake up mode is of the order of 5uA and 200mA<br />

respectively. The current consumption and the time duration in each mode help in sizing<br />

the solar cell configuration for powering the sensor nodes. In addition to that, choice of<br />

battery and the depth of discharge also have an important role in determining the power<br />

requirement of the sensor node.<br />

5.4 RF energy harvesting system and Its application in WSN<br />

This section describes the RF energy harvesting receiver system for low power application<br />

with the main focus being their application in low power WSN. However, another way of<br />

supplying power to sensor nodes is through wireless power transmission. Wireless power<br />

Transmission (WPT) is transmission of electrical power from one point to another through<br />

vaccum or an atmosphere without use of wire any other substance. This can be used for<br />

applications where either an instantaneous amount or a continuous delivery of energy is<br />

needed, but where conventional wires are unaffordable, inconvenient, expensive,<br />

hazardous, unwanted or impossible.<br />

Nicola Tesla who invented Radio, also known as “Father of Wireless” was the first who<br />

conceived the idea Wireless Power Transmission and demonstrated it in 1899. The idea<br />

behind this investigation was that, in recent years the use of wireless devices is growing in<br />

many applications like mobile phones, medical implants (Huang et al., 2008) or sensor<br />

networks. This increase in portable wireless applications has generated an increasing use of<br />

batteries. Many researchers are working on energy alternatives to reduce down their<br />

dependence on batteries and come up with low power counterparts so as to increase device<br />

lifetime. The charging of wired applications is still easy because the user can do it easily, like<br />

for mobile phones. But for other applications, like medical implants or wireless sensor nodes<br />

located in difficult access environments, the charging of the batteries remains a challenge.<br />

This requirement still increases when the number of devices is large and are distributed<br />

over a wide area or located in inaccessible places. Wireless Power Transmission (WPT) can<br />

be used as one solution to overcome the above mentioned limitations or challenges.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Different methods exist by which electrical energy can be transferred from the source to a<br />

load without the use of wire. These are: Electromagnetic Induction, Magnetic Resonance and<br />

Electromagnetic Radiation. Out of these, electromagnetic radiation is most popular for<br />

powering WSN nodes. The various RF sources and RF harvester design for the WSN nodes<br />

are discussed in the subsequent sections.<br />

5.4.1 RF energy sources<br />

RF energy harvest method can be used to remotely charge the battery operated WSN device.<br />

The different categories of available RF sources (Kumar) which can be used for conversion<br />

are listed in Table 4. Along with the frequency range, the transmitted power for the various<br />

RF sources (transmitters) is also mentioned which can be captured and used for different<br />

low power applications.<br />

RF Sources Frequency Range Tx Power<br />

FM Tower 88-108MHz 10KW<br />

TV Tower 180-220MHz 40KW<br />

AM Tower 540-1600KHz 100KW<br />

Wi-Fi 2.4-2.5GHz 10-100mW<br />

Cell Tower 800,900,1800MHz 20W<br />

Mobile Phones<br />

GSM-900<br />

GSM-1800<br />

2W<br />

1W<br />

Table 4. RF Energy Sources and their Harvested Power Estimate<br />

When more power or continuous energy is required than what is available from ambient RF<br />

sources, RF energy can be broad casted in unlicensed frequency bands such as 868MHz,<br />

915MHz, 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz. Each region has limitations on transmitted power like for e.g.<br />

its 4W in North America and 2W in Europe region.<br />

5.4.2 RF harvesting receiver system for WSN application<br />

The basic block diagram of RF powered wireless sensor node is shown in Fig. 10. It typically<br />

consists of a energy harvesting unit, controller, sensors and radio transceiver. Apart from<br />

the energy harvesting unit, rest of the blocks remain the same for designing any WSN node<br />

as described in section 5.3.3. In any energy harvesting unit, mainly three components are<br />

required, these are: energy conversion, harvesting and conditioning and energy storage.<br />

Here, the energy harvesting unit (Hagerty et al., 2005) comprises of the rectenna (antenna +<br />

rectifier) and a storage element (capacitor/battery). The design of the rectenna is done based<br />

on the power requirement of the wireless sensor node.<br />

Since the amount of useful energy obtained from RF is very less, reduction in energy<br />

consumption of system makes RF energy harvesting more practical. Researchers have come<br />

up with new solutions to improve the amount of energy being harvested from RF sources.<br />

In particular, circular polarized antennas are being implemented in the rectenna design<br />

because they avoid the directionality of other antenna designs (Strassner & Chang, 2003; Ali<br />

et al., 2005; Ren & Chang, 2006). An array of rectennas is now increasingly being used to<br />

improve the power output (Kim et al., 2006). Several new rectenna design schemes (Park et<br />

al., 2004; Chin et al., 2005) have been proposed by researchers. (Harrist, 2004), discussed<br />

223


224<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

wireless battery charging using RF energy harvesting. A charging time of 4mV/sec was<br />

observed when mobile phone batteries were charged by capturing RF energy at 915MHz.<br />

Antenna<br />

Rectifier<br />

Rectenna<br />

DC-DC<br />

Converter<br />

Storage<br />

Device<br />

Micro-controller Radio<br />

Sensor 1 Sensor n<br />

Sensor Node<br />

Fig. 10. Basic Block Diagram of RF Energy Harvested Sensor Node<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

Communication<br />

Antenna<br />

This chapter discussed the aspects of using wireless sensor networks for forest tree<br />

monitoring and alerting using rare event detection with ultra low power consumption. In<br />

this prototype, two sensors (mercury sensor & temperature sensor) which work well for the<br />

detection of fire and tree theft were selected and mesh protocol was used for alert routing<br />

and event detection. Network lifetime and latency estimation for the deployment scenario<br />

showed the implementation feasibility of such a monitoring system for deforestation<br />

application. However, as the sensor nodes are battery powered, issues related to battery life<br />

and ease of battery replacement are major concerns for WSN applications that involve long<br />

term monitoring of vast area especially hostile areas. It is therefore necessary to have some<br />

means of recharging the batteries of the sensor node to increase the network lifetime. For<br />

this, one of the most common ways is to extract the energy from the surrounding<br />

environment. Life time of network is increased by adopting RF energy harvesting technique<br />

for recharging the sensor nodes. In addition to RF technique various other energy<br />

harvesting techniques are available that can be used for this purpose. The various energy<br />

sources which can be used for this prototype implementation have been explored here. A<br />

detailed description of solar and RF energy harvesting is given which can be used to charge<br />

the batteries and hence increase the lifetime of the deployed WSN system.<br />

In future, the efforts can be taken to increase the robustness of the WSN setup in case of (a)<br />

self organization network, (b) failure of the sensor node (auto healing of sensor node) and<br />

(c) false alarms generated by sensor nodes.<br />

7. References<br />

Ali, M., Yang, G., & Dougal, R. (2005). A New Circularly Polarized Rectenna for Wireless<br />

Power Transmission and Data Communication. IEEE Propagation Letters on<br />

Antennas and Wireless, ISSN: 1536-1225, Vol. 4, pp. 205–208, August 2005.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Al-Turjman, F. M., Hassanein, H. S., & Ibnkahla, M. A. (2009). Connectivity Optimization for<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks Applied to Forest Monitoring. Proceedings of IEEE<br />

International Conference on Communications (ICC), ISBN: 978-1-4244-3435-0, pp.<br />

1-6, Dresden, June 2009.<br />

Awang, A., & Suhaimi, M. H. (2007). RIMBAMON©: A Forest Monitoring System Using<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on<br />

Intelligent and Advanced Systems(ICIAS), ISBN: 978-1-4244-1355-3, pp. 1101-1106,<br />

Kuala Lumpur, November 2007.<br />

Bahrepour, M., Meratnia, N., & Havinga, P. (2008). Automatic Fire Detection: A Survey<br />

From Wireless Sensor Network Perspective. Centre for Telematics and Information<br />

Technology (CTIT), Technical Report TR-CTIT-08-73, ISSN 1381-3625, 13 Pages,<br />

December 2008.<br />

Bicket, J., Aguayo, D., Biswas, S., & Morris, R. (2005). Architecture and Evaluation of an<br />

Unplanned 802.11b Mesh Network. Proceedings of 11th annual International<br />

Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom),ISBN:1-59593-020-<br />

5, ACM Press, Germany, August 2005.<br />

Bischoff, R., Meyer, J., Enochsson, O., Feltrin, G., & Elfgren, L. (2009). Event-based strain<br />

monitoring on a railway bridge with a wireless sensor network. Proceedings of 4th<br />

International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent<br />

Infrastructure (SHMII-4), ISBN 978-3-905594-52-2, Zurich, Switzerland, July 2009.<br />

Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D., & Tran, T. (2004). Self-configuring Localization<br />

Systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation. Journal of ACM Transactions on<br />

Embedded Computing Systems (TECS), Vol. 3, Issue 1, February 2004.<br />

Camp, J., Robinson, J., Steger, C. & Knightly, E. (2006). Measurement Driven Deployment of<br />

a Two-tier Urban Mesh Access Network. Proceedings of 4th International<br />

Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (MobiSys), ACM Press,<br />

Sweden, June 2006.<br />

Chin, C. H., Xue, Q., & Chan, C.H.(2005). Design of a 5.8 GHz Rectenna Incorporating a<br />

New patch Antenna. IEEE Propagation Letters on Antennas and Wireless, ISSN:<br />

1536-1225, Vol. 4, pp. 175–178, June 2005.<br />

Eu, Z. A., Tan, H. P., & Seah, W. K. G. (2010). Wireless Sensor Networks Powered by<br />

Ambient Energy Harvesting: An Empirical Characterization. Proceedings of IEEE<br />

International Conference on Communications (ICC), ISBN: 978-1-4244-6402-9, pp.<br />

1-5, May 2010.<br />

Faranda, R., & Leva, S. (2008). A Comparative Study of MPPT Techniques for PV Systems.<br />

Proceedings of 7th WSEAS International Conference on Application of Electrical<br />

Engineering, ISBN: 978-960-6766-80-0, 2008.<br />

Figueiredo, C. M. S., Nakamura, E. F., & Ribas, A. D. (2009). Assessing the Communication<br />

Performance of Wireless Sensor Networks in Rainforests', IEEE 2nd IFIP Wireless<br />

Days (WD), ISBN: 978-1-4244-5660-4, pp. 1-6, Paris, December 2009.<br />

Fonte, A., Zito, D., Neri, B., & Alimenti, F. (2007). Feasibility Study and Design of a Low-<br />

Cost System-on-a-Chip Microwave Radiometer on Silicon. Proceedings of IEEE<br />

International Conference on Waveform Diversity and Design, ISBN: 978-1-4244-<br />

1276-1, pp. 37-41, Pisa, June 2007.<br />

Gil, K. J., Prasetiyo, R. B., Park, H. J., Lim, S. B., & Eo, Y. D. (2010). Fire Monitoring System<br />

based on Open Map API. Proceedings of 6th IEEE International Conference on<br />

225


226<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management (NCM), ISBN:<br />

978-1-4244-7671-8 , pp. 600-605, Seoul, August 2010.<br />

Hagerty, J. A., Zhao, T., Zane, R., & Popovic, R. (2005). Efficient Broadband RF Energy<br />

Harvesting for Wireless Sensors. Proceedings of Government Microcircuit<br />

Applications & Critical Technology Conference (GOMACTech), Las Vegas, NV, pp.<br />

1-4, April 2005.<br />

Hande, A., Polk, T., Walker, W., & Bhatia, D. (2007). Indoor Solar Energy Harvesting for<br />

Sensor Network Router Nodes. Journal of Microprocessors and Microsystems,<br />

Elsevier Science Publishers, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 420-432, September 2007.<br />

Harrist, D. W. (2004). Wireless Battery Charging System using Radio Frequency Energy<br />

Harvesting. M.S. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of<br />

Pittsburgh, PA, 2004.<br />

Harvanová, V., Vojtko, M., Babiš, M., Ďuríček, M., Pohronská, M. (2011). Detection of Wood<br />

Logging Based on Sound Recognition Using Zigbee Sensor Network. Proceedings<br />

of International Conference on Design and Architectures for Signal and Image<br />

Processing, November 2011.<br />

Hefeeda, M., & Bagheri, M. (2007). Wireless Sensor Networks for Early Detection of Forest<br />

Fires. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor<br />

Systems (MASS), ISBN: 978-1-4244-1455-0, pp. 1–6, Pisa, October 2007.<br />

Hohm, D. P., & Ropp, M. E. (2000). Comparative Study of Maximum Power Point Tracking<br />

Algorithms using an Experimental, Programmable, Maximum Power Point<br />

Tracking Test Bed. Proceedings of IEEE Photovoltaics Specialist Conference, ISBN:<br />

0-7803-5772-8, pp. 1699-1702, Anchorage, AK, 2000.<br />

Huang, C-C., Yen, S-F., & Wang, C-C. (2008). A Li-ion Battery charging Design for<br />

Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and<br />

Systems (APCCAS), ISBN: 978-1-4244-2341-5, pp. 400-403, Macao, November 2008.<br />

Karlof, C. & Wagner, D. (2003). Secure Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: Attacks and<br />

Countermeasures. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Sensor<br />

Network Protocols and Applications, ISBN: 0-7803-7879-2, pp. 113-127, May 2003.<br />

Kim, J., Yang, S.Y., Song,K. D., Jones, S., & Choi, S.H. (2006). Performance Characterization<br />

of Flexible Dipole Rectennas for Smart Actuator Use. Smart Materials and<br />

Structures, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 809–815, 2006.<br />

Kompis, C., & Aliwell, S.(Editors). (2008). Energy Harvesting Technologies to Enable<br />

Remote and Wireless Sensing. Sensors and Instrumentation Knowledge Transfer<br />

Network Report, June 2008.<br />

Kovács, Z. G., Marosy, G. E., & Horváth, G. (2010). Case Study of a Simple, Low Power<br />

WSN Implementation for Forest Monitoring. Proceedings of 12th Biennial Baltic<br />

Electronics Conference (BEC), ISBN: 978-1-4244-7356-4, pp. 161-164, Tallinn,<br />

October 2010.<br />

Kumar, G. Radiation Hazards from Cell phones/Cell Towers. IIT Bombay.<br />

Kumar, K. (2010). Modelling, Design and Fabrication of Grid-connected Photovoltaic<br />

Systems. M. Tech. Thesis, Department of Reliability Engineering, IIT Bombay,<br />

<strong>India</strong>, July 2010.<br />

Lozano, C., & Rodriguez, O. (2010). Design of Forest Fire Early Detection System Using<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks. The Online Journal on Electronics and Electrical<br />

Engineering (OJEEE), Vol. 3, No. 2, Reference Number: W10-0097.


Sustainable Forest Management Techniques<br />

Luming, F., Aijun, X., & Lihua, T. (2008). A Study of the Key Technology of Forest Fire<br />

Prevention Based on a Cooperation of Video Monitor and GIS. Proceedings of 4th<br />

IEEE International Conference on Natural Computation, ISBN: 978-0-7695-3304-9,<br />

pp. 391-396, Jinan, October 2008.<br />

Magrath, W. B., Grandalski, R. L., Stuckey, G. L., Vikanes, G. B., Wilkinson, G R. (2007).<br />

Timber Theft Prevention: Introduction to Security for Forest Managers. Sustainable<br />

Development-East Asia and Pacific Region, Discussion Papers, The World Bank<br />

Publication, August 2007.<br />

Mahlknecht, S., & Roetzer, M. (2005). Energy Supply Considerations for Self-sustaining<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of IEEE Second European Workshop on<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks, ISBN: 0-7803-8801-1, pp. 397-399, January 2005.<br />

Middleware for Sensor Networks, available at<br />

http://lsir-swissex.epfl.ch/index.php/GSN:Home<br />

Mohmmed, S. S., Ramasamy, K., & Shanmuganantham, T. (2010). Wireless Power<br />

Transmission – A Next Generation Power Transmission System. International<br />

Journal of Computer Applications, ISBN: 978-93-80746-12-8, Vol 1, No.13, 2010.<br />

Park, J. Y., Han, S. M., & Itoh, T. (2004). A Rectenna Design with Harmonic-Rejecting<br />

Circular-Sector Antenna. IEEE Propagation Letters on Antennas and Wireless,<br />

ISSN: 1536-1225, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 52–54, December 2004.<br />

Powerharvester P1100 Module from Powercast, datasheet available at<br />

http://powercastco.com/PDF/HarvesterDataSheetv2.pdf<br />

Przydatek, B., Chan, H., Song D. & Perrig, A. (2007). SIA: Secure Information Aggregation in<br />

Sensor Networks. Journal on Computer Security-Special Issue on Security of Adhoc<br />

and Sensor Networks, Vol. 15, No. 1, ACM Press, January 2007.<br />

Raju, M., (2008). Energy Harvesting ULP meets energy harvesting: A game-changing<br />

combination for design engineers. Texas Instruments White Paper, 2008.<br />

Ren, Y. J., & Chang, K. (2006). 5.8 GHz Circularly Polarized Dual-Diode Rectenna and<br />

Rectenna Array for Microwave Power Transmission. IEEE Transactions on<br />

Microwave Theory and Techniques, ISSN: 0018-9480, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 1495–1502,<br />

April 2006.<br />

Rosi, A., Bicocchi, N., Castelli, G., Mamei, M., & Zambonelli, F. (2011). Landslide Monitoring<br />

with Sensor Networks: Experiences and Lessons Learnt from a Real-World<br />

Deployment. International Journal of Sensor Networks, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp.111-122.<br />

Seah, W. K. G., Eu Z. A., & Tan, H. P. (2009). Wireless Sensor Networks Powered by<br />

Ambient Energy Harvesting (WSN-HEAP) – Survey and Challenges. Proceedings<br />

of 1st IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular<br />

Technology, Information Theory, Aerospace & Electronics Systems Technology<br />

(VITAE), ISBN: 978-1-4244-4066-5, pp. 1–5, Aalborg, May 2009.<br />

SensorMap, available at http://atom.research.microsoft.com/ sensewebv3/sensormap<br />

SensorML, Sensor Model Language, available at<br />

http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sensorml<br />

Singh, S. K., Singh, M. P., & Singh, D. K. (2010). Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor<br />

Networks – A Survey. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering<br />

Survey (IJCSES), Vol.1, No.2, November 2010.<br />

Sizing, Solar Energy Harvesters for Wireless Sensor Networks. Application Note M1002, RF<br />

Monolithics, Inc., 2010.<br />

227


228<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Soisoonthorn, T., & Rujipattanapong, S. (2007). Deforestation Detection Algorithm for<br />

Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on<br />

Communication and Information Technologies (ISCIT), ISBN: 978-1-4244-0976-1,<br />

pp. 1413-1416, Sydney, December 2007.<br />

Strassner, B.,& Chang, K. (2003). 5.8-GHz Circularly polarized dual-rhombic-loop travelingwave<br />

rectifying antenna for low power-density wireless power transmission<br />

applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, ISSN: 0018-<br />

9480, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1548–1553, May 2003.<br />

UCSD Active Campus available at http://activecampus.ucsd. Edu/.<br />

Wang, G., Zhang, J., Li, W., Cui, D., & Jing, Y. (2010). A Forest Fire Monitoring System Based<br />

on GPRS and ZigBee Wireless Sensor Network. Proceedings of 5th IEEE<br />

Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), ISBN: 978-1-4244-<br />

5045-9, pp. 1859-1862, Taichung, June 2010.<br />

Wark, T., Hu, W., Corke, P., Hodge, J., Keto, A., Mackey, B., Foley, G., Sikka, P., & Br¨unig,<br />

M. (2008). Springbrook: Challenges in Developing a Long-Term, Rainforest<br />

Wireless Sensor Network. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on<br />

Intelligent Sensors Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), ISBN:<br />

978-1-4244-3822-8, pp. 599-604, Sydney, December 2008.<br />

Zhang, J., Li, W., Yin, Z., Liu, S., & Guo, X. (2009). Forest Fire Detection System based on<br />

Wireless Sensor Network. Proceedings of 4 th IEEE Conference on Industrial<br />

Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), ISBN: 978-1-4244-2799-4, pp. 520-523, Xian,<br />

May 2009.


12<br />

Bunjil Forest Watch<br />

a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Chris Goodman<br />

Object Consulting Pty Ltd,<br />

Australia<br />

Imagine the power of an Internet-enabled social network that tracked disturbances to the<br />

world's most precious forests. Independent observers could expose failings in forest<br />

management and help improve governance.<br />

This scenario is not far-fetched, although satellite-monitoring technology has to be made<br />

more accessible to non-technical, grass-roots organisations that are independent of official<br />

agencies. The good news is that new and organic forms of social organisation and activism<br />

are possible by merging the blogosphere with new public tools such as CrowdMap.com.<br />

(Ushahidi, 2011). One example is an interactive map developed to show land grabs linked to<br />

political elites in Sarawak (Malaysia Today, 2011).<br />

This essay proposes a free public online service that provides non-expert conservation<br />

groups in remote locations with alerts about recent forest disturbances in their area. It also<br />

explains how such a service might work. Many of the required technical components<br />

already exist in various forms.<br />

Local conservation groups living in remote forest areas should not need to understand all<br />

the technologies behind the service; nor have advanced computing resources or broadband<br />

at their disposal. They should be able to just sign-up to receive free, timely reports about<br />

recent disturbances in their area, in their own language, on their phone.<br />

Under the proposal, local groups would control which areas are monitored by subscribing<br />

to the service. On receiving reports about a disturbance, the groups would perform<br />

enforcement activities according to their judgment and circumstances. They would also<br />

provide feedback by responding to the reports.<br />

It is critical that the complex collection and processing of remotely sensed data be<br />

completely automated.<br />

The proposal puts the public at the centre by actively encouraging the participation of<br />

volunteer observers to perform the routine task of regularly checking new images obtained<br />

via satellites. The volunteer observers need not be experts nor have any other connection<br />

with the local group other than a common desire to preserve the forest. The service itself<br />

would provide all the training for volunteers to become competent observers.<br />

Removing barriers to participation allows the service to be widely deployed. It is envisaged<br />

that environmental NGOs would promote the free service to communities in forest regions,<br />

while soliciting volunteers from among their international support base.<br />

A system that can provide this service would need to combine:


230<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Automated detection, collection, processing and delivery of new satellite images;<br />

A public online volunteer observer registration system.<br />

Automated distribution of observation tasks to volunteers;<br />

An open registration system to add new protected areas;<br />

Automated delivery of reports to remote conservation groups;<br />

And a process for local groups to respond to the reports with on-the-ground information.<br />

These features must all be integrated by a task-based workflow system. The workflow issues<br />

messages to volunteers when new images are ready and to local groups when new reports<br />

are made. It promotes regular interaction by actively prompting users to complete tasks and<br />

by providing encouragement for completing tasks. It also prompts the local groups to<br />

provide feedback on the reports they receive.<br />

The proposed monitoring service would build on the accomplishments of existing<br />

deforestation monitoring systems, but differ in a number of ways:<br />

It is geared towards early detection and intervention in user-selected areas, rather than<br />

a complete regional analysis;<br />

It is completely online and cloud hosted, so there are no infrastructure requirements for<br />

users;<br />

It is non-institutional, relying instead on online relationships and reputations;<br />

It formally separates observation and response into separate roles;<br />

It is completely workflow based. New data triggers tasks to create reports, which create<br />

new tasks;<br />

It is tightly integrated with online training, wikis, blogs and discussion forums;<br />

It relies on continuous user feedback for quality control and ground data collection.<br />

Volunteers would be able to register with minimal barriers to entry and then be encouraged<br />

to develop their skills and knowledge with online training and networking with other<br />

volunteers.<br />

This design is not an argument against automated detection. On the contrary, algorithms<br />

that can highlight deforestation and degradation assist volunteers to identify disturbances<br />

and help them know when to raise an alert.<br />

Nor is this an argument against developing capacity among local groups to perform their<br />

own monitoring. Using volunteers as a resource has several benefits. First, they already<br />

have familiarity with and access to modern computers, monitors, broadband bandwidth<br />

and social networks. Second, they belong to different networks than the local groups. These<br />

may be crucial for exposing corruption and lobbying internationally. Third, there are likely<br />

to be many more volunteers in urban areas willing to spend time monitoring, and this<br />

allows the local group to spend scarce resources on activities such as verification,<br />

enforcement and reporting. Finally, the service may foster a greater awareness of and<br />

connection to deforestation issues among the volunteers, as well as develop invaluable<br />

cross-cultural relationships between and among the local groups and the volunteers.<br />

This alert service would not work without complementary conservation strategies. Strategies<br />

include protected areas, UN-REDD, sustainable development, land reform and anti-corruption<br />

programs. National monitoring programs would also be required for systematic coverage and<br />

to measure net verifiable national reductions as required for REDD (Nepstad, et al., 2009).<br />

REDD stands for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation. This UNFCC<br />

program is based on the idea that developed countries wishing to reduce climate change can<br />

pay developing countries to reduce CO2 emissions from deforestation or forest degradation


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

through the implementation of policies such as strengthened law enforcement, fire<br />

management or sustainable forest management. The framework requires measuring the<br />

existing carbon stored in the forest and estimating what would be emitted under a business<br />

as usual scenario. A project to avoid those emissions is proposed and at the end of a set time<br />

period, the actual emissions are measured and compared to what would have happened.<br />

The reduced emissions have a financial value that can be traded in carbon markets. Some of<br />

the value is hopefully transferred to the locals as income for preserving the forest. Redd-<br />

Monitor.org has a good introduction to REDD and its many controversies. REDD is<br />

important but not essential to this service.<br />

Just as REDD threatens to recentralise forest governance (Phelps et al., 2010), this service<br />

may help democratise forest monitoring away from national forest departments where the<br />

capability and governance is not yet in place, and towards grass-roots organisations.<br />

There are several challenges to achieve this. One critical ingredient is regular, low-cost<br />

access to recent satellite images - and automated processing of those images into a format<br />

volunteers could reliably decode.<br />

To eliminate costs to end users, the system should be based on open-source software, cloudhosted,<br />

and have free regular access to timely satellite data. The solution needs to focus on<br />

simplicity of use and hide as much complexity as possible behind a well-designed webapplication.<br />

2. Purpose<br />

"Never depend upon institutions of government to solve any problem. All social movements are<br />

founded by, guided by, motivated and seen through by the passion of individuals."<br />

Margaret Mead<br />

This tool could provide a complementary self-selecting targeted approach to monitoring<br />

areas of high conservation value wherever a local group wishes to protect their forests from<br />

external threats.<br />

The main purpose of the service is to provide local conservation groups with timely<br />

information about forest disturbances in their area and to provide them with increased<br />

opportunities to respond quickly to recent deforestation, particularly illegal logging and<br />

land clearing. A recent study of Sumatra and Kalimantan found that at least 6.5% of all<br />

forest cover loss had occurred in land where clearing was banned, and a further 13.6 %<br />

where it was legally restricted (Broich et al., 2011).<br />

A secondary purpose is to develop networks between people working to conserve remote<br />

areas and ‘environmentalists’ in populated, digitally-connected areas.<br />

3. Who are the users?<br />

“Enforcement against illegal deforestation is clearly a state function, but civil society can<br />

provide a formidable assist with timely, high-quality, user-friendly information.”<br />

Three Essential Strategies for Reducing Deforestation<br />

(Aliança da Terra et al., 2007)<br />

This proposal separates forest monitoring into two main roles, the volunteer observers, who<br />

regularly review the latest satellite images and the local groups, who rely on alerts when<br />

disturbances are detected. Other roles include the sponsors & NGOs, satellite data<br />

providers, and developers.<br />

231


232<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

3.1 Local groups<br />

“Community Forest Management (CFM) establishes formal systems between communities and<br />

Forest Departments in which communities have the right to controlled amounts of forest<br />

products from a given parcel of forest and in return agree to protect the forest and manage it<br />

collectively. Mostly these parcels are relatively small, from 25 to 500 hectares, being managed by<br />

groups of 10 to 50 households. A number of countries have used CFM very effectively to reverse<br />

deforestation and degradation processes”<br />

GOFC-GOLD Sourcebook (GOFC-GOLD, 2010)<br />

The service needs to be promoted to community-based conservationists who may live in<br />

remote forest communities and who may be difficult to reach via conventional marketing<br />

channels. The service must be distributed to the networks used by local groups and use a<br />

language they share.<br />

Local groups could be environment advocacy groups, rangers protecting a park, indigenous<br />

people protecting their land or community based forest managers. The local groups might<br />

be participating in a REDD project, or other programs.<br />

Groups may be isolated both physically and politically. Over 1150 rural activists have been<br />

killed in conflicts related to land in Brazil alone, according to Catholic Land Pastoral<br />

(Dangle, 2011). Murder convictions are rare and even rarer for those that hire the gunmen.<br />

Fighting deforestation is also dangerous in Indonesia and Malaysia. In Papua New Guinea,<br />

where more than 800 languages are spoken in one of the most biodiverse regions on earth,<br />

deforestation is running at over 1.5%pa, most of it illegal.<br />

“States with rain forests are often unable to collect optimal revenue from the massive profit<br />

earned by timber companies that harvest state forests because this profit already has a hidden<br />

destination. Heads of state and their political supporters are siphoning off these moneys to<br />

become phenomenally wealthy.”<br />

David Brown, PhD Dissertation (Brown 2001)<br />

As much as possible, the solution must remove the barriers for local groups to have access to<br />

timely reports. The groups cannot be assumed to have expertise in remote sensing, but may<br />

be able to interpret maps, directions or coordinates. Computer literacy cannot be assumed,<br />

but access to a mobile phone is almost universal. Access to smart-phones, GPS and phone<br />

cameras is becoming increasingly common but is not yet universal. Some literacy in the<br />

predominant national language is required by at least one member of the group or a trusted<br />

partner. The capacity to visit, investigate and record deforestation events in their locality is<br />

important. The ability to prevent or discourage deforestation in some way is also important.<br />

Engaging local groups would be the first bottleneck to expanding the reach of the service.<br />

Enhancing the monitoring capability could expose enforcement bottlenecks in that region.<br />

Other capacity constraints such as computation, memory and bandwidth are easier to<br />

overcome. It is unlikely to be difficult to recruit sufficient volunteers as each volunteer could<br />

potentially review an image 180km on a side (Goodman, 2010).<br />

The ‘user-experience’ for local groups should be designed to be sensitive to local and<br />

regional cultural norms and languages.<br />

3.2 Volunteers<br />

The volunteer observers sign up to monitor satellite images on behalf of a local group. The<br />

volunteers may be distributed around the world with no direct connection to the local group<br />

other than through the monitoring service. They must have adequate time and Internet access.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

The Internet, as a low cost medium with global reach, can facilitate the formation of global<br />

virtual communities - compensating for a lack of critical mass of activists in a given country<br />

(Ackland et al., 2006), (Chadwick & Howard, 2009). Creating a critical mass is an even<br />

greater challenge for remote communities in developing tropical countries.<br />

Community Based Forest Monitoring could rapidly engage environmental activists who are<br />

already active users of the Internet. It may be quicker to develop the observational capability<br />

among digitally connected volunteers, and develop collaborative networks, than building<br />

the capacity in remote communities.<br />

To design the volunteers’ “user-experience” it is necessary to understand their reasons for<br />

participating. Volunteers may be motivated and inspired to be active by ecological<br />

experiences and connections with nature; a sense of personal responsibility; a desire to<br />

change the world and feeling that they could make a difference; by fear and anxiety about<br />

ecological crisis and commitments to justice; or by influential people and social networks<br />

(La Rocca, 2004). It also has to be cool. Barriers to becoming active include time available:<br />

lack of skills or confidence; alienation or lack of opportunity. Challenges for keeping<br />

volunteers active include making the work enjoyable and meaningful; making a difference<br />

and responsibility to the local groups.<br />

Each volunteer’s participation is sustained by the regular tasks assigned to them and by<br />

feedback from the local group.<br />

Volunteers are not necessarily living in the same country as the local group, although this<br />

might become common in tropical countries with advanced urban populations such as<br />

Brazil, Malaysia and Indonesia. They may even come from among the local group.<br />

Volunteers should ideally share a common language with the local group they serve. The<br />

volunteer user-experience needs to at least cater for English, French, Spanish, Portuguese<br />

and Bahasa speakers to cover the main tropical forest regions.<br />

Volunteers need to recognise the limitations on the local groups’ ability to combat illegal<br />

loggers, especially the great danger, difficulty reaching sites, and limited law enforcement.<br />

3.3 <strong>Environment</strong>al NGOs<br />

Non-Government Organisations could promote the volunteering opportunity to their<br />

members. They also provide a narrative structure to the regular tasks and feedback.<br />

It is possible (but not necessary) that local groups and volunteers enter into agreements to<br />

preserve the forest. These could be through a NGO. The service forms a backbone of<br />

information exchange and monitoring that may support the terms of the agreement by<br />

building trust among the parties.<br />

NGOs may wish to rebrand the service as their own. Associating the service with their<br />

trusted reputation gives credibility to the service while at the same time the service extends<br />

their offering and builds their networks.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al NGOs with strong regional networks among local groups are important in<br />

promoting the service through the local groups’ networks. These NGOs may even partner<br />

with local groups who need assistance with subscriptions, communications or translations<br />

in some regions.<br />

International NGOs with large member and supporter networks are important for<br />

promoting the service to potential volunteers. NGOs constantly struggle to find new and<br />

meaningful ways to engage with their supporters, beyond asking for donations. By allowing<br />

volunteers to ‘adopt’ a threatened area, the NGO provides an opportunity for supporters to<br />

feel they are contributing in a direct and meaningful way.<br />

233


234<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

3.4 Sponsors<br />

Sponsors may provide a financial incentive to the local group to preserve the forest. It is not<br />

essential for the financial agreement to be integrated into the monitoring service. Sponsors<br />

can add incentives for subscribing to the system. Project sponsors may be affiliated with<br />

volunteers, NGOs or local groups or in a combination.<br />

Sponsors or NGOs may target then reach out to local groups in areas identified as high risk<br />

(Sales et al., 2011).<br />

Sponsors are also critical to financing the development, operation and maintenance of the<br />

system.<br />

4. Existing deforestation monitoring systems<br />

Before describing the proposed service in detail a review of existing deforestation<br />

monitoring programs is presented.<br />

Detecting deforestation and forest degradation from space by observing changes in light<br />

reflected from the canopy is not a straightforward task. Nevertheless, detecting<br />

deforestation from space has developed over several decades and is now considered routine<br />

(Asner, 2009). Detection of forest degradation is harder but also possible.<br />

Brazil has the largest and most systematic use of remote sensing for environmental<br />

protection of any country. Some notable operational systems include DETER and<br />

PRODES by the Brazil Space Agency, INPE; SAD by Brazilian not-for-profit IMAZON;<br />

and CLASlite by the Carnegie Institution for Science which is also focused primarily on<br />

the Amazon.<br />

Between 2005 and 2008, PRODES indicated deforestation in the Amazon had slowed<br />

compared to what it would have been without the detection and enforcement. However,<br />

more recent data from INPE indicates deforestation rates have accelerated by 27% from<br />

August 2010 to April 2011 (BBC, 9 May 2011 & The Guardian, 12 June 2011).<br />

4.1 INPE: DETER & PRODES<br />

“If you are going to do prevention and enforcement, you need to be there as rapidly as possible.”<br />

Gilberto Câmara, Director of INPE quoted by Alexei May in NYT (May 2008)<br />

The Brazil Space Agency INPE runs DETER and PRODES. The newer DETER system can<br />

detect large scale illegal logging in near real time while PRODES has higher resolution but<br />

results are only updated annually.<br />

DETER provides an update every 15 days and sends alerts to Brazil’s Ministry of<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> enforcement agency IBAMA, and police. Loggers are fined and sometime have<br />

their property confiscated. DETER relies on a range of satellites including Advanced<br />

Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and the China-Brazil<br />

Earth Resources Satellite CBERS-2.<br />

The Brazil Space Program for monitoring the Amazon commenced during the Cold War as a<br />

military operation, but was later re-purposed to facilitate economic development and<br />

expansion. Now the technology has further developed and applied to the detection of<br />

deforestation. IT systems tend to reflect the organisation that created it (Rajão & Hayes,<br />

2009). Originally designed by specialists for use by officials and agencies, it is now evolving<br />

into an open system.<br />

The technology and capability developed by INPE should have global applicability,<br />

although it is currently only deployed over the Amazon region. Expanding deforestation


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

detection systems beyond Brazil’s national borders is challenging. Especially to protect areas<br />

covered by reluctant, indifferent or corrupt government agencies; where the government<br />

has limited jurisdiction; and where the country has no capacity to access and interpret the<br />

results or to enforce protection.<br />

INPE committed in 2008 to making the data and technology publicly available, through the<br />

Data Democracy Initiative of the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS). The<br />

commitment extends to governments of developing nations. The CBERS for Africa project<br />

will provide CBERS images to African countries as part of the Group on Earth Observation.<br />

INPE software has also been released as open source as the SPRING library and INPE has<br />

released code for applications TerraLib, TerraView and Marlin built on SPRING. However,<br />

a non-specialist would be unlikely to figure out how to extract meaningful data from the<br />

current systems.<br />

4.2 IMAZON’s deforestation alert system<br />

Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia (IMAZON) developed Systema De Alerta de<br />

Desmatamento (SAD) to monitor deforestation in the Amzon. SAD reports monthly. Like<br />

DETER it uses the low spatial resolution (250m) images from the Moderate Resolution<br />

Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) aboard ASTER and publishes data on Amazon<br />

deforestation rates each month. Unlike DETER, SAD uses Normalised Difference Fraction<br />

Index (NDFI) to detect not only deforestation but also forest degradation. This picks up a lot<br />

more land that is degraded. Both SAD and DETER results have been challenged by<br />

powerful opponents and withstood rigorous analysis.<br />

ImazonGEO is an open-source open-data Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) from Imazon that<br />

integrates remote sensing with law enforcement (Souza et al., 2009).<br />

Neither SAD nor DETER are good at detecting deforestation less than 25ha (Escada et al.,<br />

2011). PRODES is better at detecting small-scale disturbances, but has low temporal resolution.<br />

One technique to improve detection capacity is to combine data from higher spatial resolution<br />

sensors with high temporal resolution sensors. This involves using the older but higher<br />

resolution images to extract better information from the newer but lower resolution images.<br />

Cloud cover can affect temporal resolution by preventing the satellite from capturing a clear<br />

image. Cloud cover particularly affects the humid tropics. Access to a range of sensors on<br />

different satellites can improve the frequency of capturing cloud free images.<br />

4.3 FORMA<br />

Forest Monitoring for Action (FORMA) is a prototype system by the Centre for Global<br />

Development that achieves good resolution using Time Series or Trajectory Based Methods<br />

based on the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Field product (VCF) to look at long term trends<br />

in change in NDVI. FORMA can detect deforestation the size of a football field. It also<br />

detects fires in near real time. The 2009 prototype covers Sumatra and is updated monthly<br />

(Hammer et al., 2009).<br />

4.4 CLASlite<br />

Carnegie Landsat Analysis System Lite (CLASlite) [claslite.ciw.edu] is an automated satellite<br />

mapping approach that performs statistical analysis on raw satellite images to detect subpixel<br />

changes in forest cover. While broad-scale clear felling is easy to detect, CLASlite can<br />

also detect selective logging down to one or two trees. It is able to distinguish undisturbed<br />

forest from recent degradation and regrowth.<br />

235


236<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

After calibration, pre-processing, atmospheric correction, and cloud masking steps,<br />

CLASlite will analyse the spectrum reflected in each pixel. Vegetation that photosynthesizes<br />

has a different spectral signal from dead trees, rocks or soil. A 'Monte Carlo' analysis then<br />

produces a range of possible combinations that converge on the most likely explanation for<br />

the data (Asner, 2009). By determining the fractional cover from canopy, dead wood and<br />

bare surfaces, CLASlite can provide maps of the forest’s composition, including where it has<br />

been disturbed. If a tiny red reflection is picked up indicating bare earth, and that signal<br />

forms a line over several pixels, the most likely explanation would be a road.<br />

Detecting new logging tracks early increases the opportunity to combat deforestation and<br />

degradation, as these are often the first indication of more extensive logging to come.<br />

For input, CLASlite can use a wide variety of satellite imagery including: Landsat 4 and 5<br />

Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), ASTER, Earth<br />

Observing-1 Advanced Land Imager (ALI), Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre 4 and 5<br />

(SPOT), and MODIS.<br />

4.4.1 Applicability<br />

Originally designed for lowland tropical forest, the CLASlite detection method has been tested<br />

on imagery from Borneo, Madagascar, the Hawaiian Islands and Mozambique (Asner, 2009).<br />

To generically detect deforestation and disturbance, the method needs to identify changes in<br />

forest canopy cover without being overly sensitive to variation in forest type (Asner, 2009).<br />

Results show that very different forests can be directly assessed and compared anywhere in<br />

the world by the system (Asner, 2009).<br />

4.4.2 Licencing<br />

CLASlite was created by Greg Asner and the Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie<br />

Institution for Science. CLASlite is supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation,<br />

the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the endowment of the Carnegie<br />

Institution for Science.<br />

According to the end user license agreement, the Carnegie Institution intends to work with<br />

third parties in the dissemination and use of CLASlite for the purpose of conducting<br />

environmental studies and monitoring. The user agreement protects Carnegie’s proprietary<br />

information, restricts copying and requires attribution to Carnegie in all reports. Results<br />

obtained from the use of CLASlite, are to be used for non-profit purposes only. The technology<br />

is provided for free to governments and others in Latin America (Tollefson, 2009).<br />

The software could have additional utility if published as a modular library with an<br />

Application Programing Interface (API). This would allow it to be mashed-up into new<br />

applications. Porting the software to Google Earth Engine should demonstrate this.<br />

4.4.3 Deployment and outreach<br />

A 2008 grant from the Moore Foundation has allowed the CLASlite team to provide training<br />

and technology transfer in most tropical forest nations in the Andes-Amazon region, stretching<br />

from Venezuela and Guyana across to Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia (Carnegie, 2008).<br />

The capacity building program provides one-day workshops and technical support to<br />

government, academic and NGOs in the region. The aim is for each country to build up its<br />

own remote-sensing team (Regalado, 2010).<br />

The CLASlite user website is intended as a space for collective knowledge building to<br />

improve forest monitoring and management in the Andes-Amazon region.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

4.4.4 Constraints<br />

"While the principal advantage of CLASlite is that it opens options to users who are not<br />

necessarily specialists, it is necessary to have people who know exactly what can and cannot be<br />

done with CLASlite. I don't know if I would call this a difficulty, but it is a characteristic shared<br />

with other approaches to monitoring deforestation."<br />

Manuel Peralvo, Ecuador (CLASlite, 2009)<br />

Although CLASlite is presently only available to non-commercial institutions in the Andes-<br />

Amazon Region, it demonstrates that forest monitoring can become an everyday activity<br />

that no longer requires huge investments in computers or expertise (Knapp, 2008).<br />

CLASlite presently requires some user technical training to install and maintain. To what<br />

extent could the preparation of images for CLASlite and the creation of maps be automated?<br />

The steps for preparing CLASlite input are not trivial. They depend on the satellite sensor<br />

and rely on third party software such as ENVI or ERDAS to:<br />

Geo-reference the image to a UTM projection (WGS-84 ellipsoid);<br />

For LANDSAT, resample the thermal band to match the spectral image resolution;<br />

Reorder bands, if necessary;<br />

Save the image to GeoTIFF or ENVI format;<br />

These steps are largely repetitive for regularly monitoring new images of the same location,<br />

so an automated image workflow could be contemplated. How well would CLASlite or its<br />

successor perform unsupervised is unclear.<br />

A new version of CLASlite is being integrated with Google Earth Engine.<br />

4.5 Other monitoring technologies<br />

The state of the art in forest monitoring is advancing on many fronts. New satellites and<br />

sensors are increasing resolution and hyper-spectral bands. Forest monitoring systems must<br />

remain adaptable to operationalize new sensors and algorithms as they become available.<br />

The PALSAR (Phased Array L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar) sensor abort the Japanese<br />

ALOS satellite also showed it is possible to detect forest disturbances even through cloud<br />

cover (Kellndorfer, 2008). Unfortunately the satellite failed in April 2011. This capability is<br />

useful against illegal loggers who use persistent cloud cover to hide their operations.<br />

Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) is opening up a new dimension<br />

particularly for the estimation of carbon in a forest.<br />

Much effort is now focussed on political, financial and technical systems for valuing and<br />

measuring, reporting and verifying carbon stored in forests for the UN-REDD program.<br />

Using LIDAR this is technically possible but still difficult as it introduces carbon inventories,<br />

which are sensitive to forest type. The required political and international financial<br />

institutions add further complexity. REDD projects work on longer-term financial cycles and<br />

may operate better at regional and national levels. The technology for REDD is significantly<br />

more complex than the detection of recent deforestation (easy) or forest degradation (harder<br />

but established). REDD should promote considerable innovation in forest carbon monitoring.<br />

There are now many tools and standards from which to build a forest monitoring system.<br />

TerraLib, TerraView and Marlin are based on INPE’s SPRING open-source library.<br />

OpenLayers and Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS GIS) from the<br />

Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo) are also useful open-source toolkits.<br />

The Kings College London, KCL Geodata portal contains a collection of useful tools for<br />

environmental monitoring. [sites.google.com/site/consmapping]<br />

237


238<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

4.6 Google earth engine<br />

Google demonstrated a prototype of Google Earth Engine at the IPCC COP15 in Copenhagen<br />

in December 2009. Earth Engine is a project of Google.org, Google’s philanthropic arm. It is<br />

supported by technology partners Greg Asner, the developer of CLASlite, Carlos Souza Jr.<br />

developer of IMAZON’s SAD and others. Financial sponsors include Google itself as well as<br />

the Gordon & Betty Moore foundation, which also sponsored CLASlite.<br />

As well as simplifying access to images, the Earth Engine will include algorithms that can<br />

transform the raw images into deforestation maps.<br />

This engine will allow Google’s vast storage, computational and bandwidth resources to be<br />

harnessed to provide post-processed images in a user friendly format. The problem of<br />

creating and maintaining IT infrastructure for distributing, storing and viewing large data<br />

sets is solved by moving the application to Google’s cloud. Users need only have a web<br />

browser. The engine will “Facilitate transparency and security to their data and results.<br />

Because the data, analysis and results reside online, they can also be easily shared and<br />

independently verified.” (Google.org, 2010)<br />

Google Earth Engine is expected to include (GOFC-GOLD, 2010):<br />

Integrated access to many satellite data products;<br />

A means to request additional data from public databases;<br />

Tools for creating spatial and temporal mosaics of the data products;<br />

Built-in mapping and monitoring algorithms;<br />

Atmospheric correction, if desired (See Asner, 2009);<br />

CLASlite forest-view, forest-cover or forest-change maps;<br />

Imazon SAD functionality;<br />

An API to introduce new algorithms;<br />

A geoviewer such as Google Earth browser plug-in;<br />

Google Fusion Tables;<br />

Just-in-time computation.<br />

Both CLASlite [code.google.com/p/claslite] and Imazon’s open-source Spatial Data<br />

Infrastructure (SDI) [code.google.com/p/imazon-sad] are being ported to Google Earth<br />

Engine.<br />

The prototype catalogue currently includes access to incomplete archives of many Earth<br />

monitoring satellites including LANDSAT, Terra & Aqua and various products from<br />

MODIS. These include Surface Reflectance images at multiple frequency bands, and mosaics<br />

or composite products such as MODIS Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Burn Area<br />

Index (BAI).<br />

The beta site demonstrates the potential with a high-resolution forest map of Mexico created<br />

in record time. Despite the potential, a casual visitor to the prototype may be disappointed<br />

as it does yet not contain recent images. To detect recent deforestation, the catalogue must<br />

be updated continuously. The solution must include a means to add to the catalogue on<br />

demand, and to load other data products.<br />

There is a lack of documentation regarding the prototype. An API has been foreshadowed<br />

but no product roadmap has been announced.<br />

All data will be ortho-rectified on import. This makes it possible to mix images from other<br />

sensors. A multi-sensor approach can adapt to missing or poor quality data leading to<br />

improved continuity. Ortho-rectified maps can be published to Google Maps or other<br />

viewers. This also makes it easier to combine the output with other maps and data.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

It is unclear what form of open access will be granted to Google Earth Engine. The company<br />

has announced it is giving away 10 million hours of CPU per year, but not said how this will<br />

be metered. Developer access to code and user access to applications has yet to be defined.<br />

Implementing applications SAD and CLASlite into an API promises to create a next<br />

generation Spatial Data Infrastructure with unprecedented storage and computation power,<br />

increased usability, and universal accessibility for civil society.<br />

5. Bunjil forest watch<br />

Bunjil Forest Watch is a web service proposed by the author for the rapid detection and<br />

reporting of deforestation. Existing technology would provide the building blocks from<br />

which such a service might be built.<br />

This application does not attempt to measure, report and verify, just to detect, and let people<br />

on the ground verify and report back. This is simpler than the technology required for<br />

REDD. It is designed as an alarm bell to disrupt deforestation as it occurs and to assist<br />

advocacy. It emphasises speed of detection and intervention over systematic regional cover.<br />

The system proposed here is likely to work best on smaller scales. Many conservation issues<br />

apply at landscape scales where changes of geology or hydrology lead to unique ecosystems<br />

and conservation hot-spots. Sites that may be too big to easily monitor on the ground, may<br />

not be so big that local groups are unable to do field inspections or enforcement.<br />

The architecture comprises modules to collect satellite data; to process the images into maps;<br />

to enlist volunteers; to create and distribute tasks; to facilitate observation tasks; to generate<br />

and distribute disturbance reports and to ensure the integrity of the processes.<br />

Before describing each architectural component of Bunjil Forest Watch, a story about how it<br />

could work will help tie the pieces together. Imagine the end user’s perspective:<br />

“As a conservationist, wishing to protect my land from illegal clearing, I want to know<br />

about any changes to my land as soon as possible so that I can respond to them. I don’t<br />

know much about satellites, and I can’t afford to pay someone to continually check for new<br />

data. If a service could just email me to tell me when something changes and where, it<br />

would help me protect my land.”<br />

The local group learns of the existence of the forest watch service through their networks. A<br />

member may either visit the web site and self-subscribe or have a partner in a regional<br />

environment organisation set up the subscription on their behalf.<br />

The main web site has a link in multiple languages to take the user through the online<br />

subscription process to add a site to the monitoring list. The subscription records the name<br />

and contact details for the group, information about the area they wish to monitor and why.<br />

The borders of the area of interest can be defined by outlining them on a map. It is essential<br />

that this process not intimidate users by asking questions they may be unable to answer.<br />

Also, it should provide a help button to ensure that potential subscribers get assistance to<br />

complete the process.<br />

Anyone can register to be a volunteer observer. Observers may be recruited via<br />

environmental NGOs. During registration the observer is asked to commit to promptly<br />

completing any observation tasks sent to them, and to complete the online training. A<br />

volunteer may be assigned to one or more parts of a conservation area.<br />

New subscriptions may need to be processed by an expert group who can choose data<br />

products and processing appropriate for the biogeography of the Area Of Interest (AOI).<br />

Automated mapping algorithms may require tuning with locally-relevant training data and<br />

239


240<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

forest definitions in order to produce maps that reflect different definitions of forests,<br />

deforestation and degradation.<br />

These experts may be drawn from among the volunteers, developers, environmental NGOs<br />

academics or remote sensing professionals. Selecting the appropriate satellite sensors,<br />

bands, algorithms and layers is complex. However, this need only be done once to set up the<br />

initial settings for a periodic monitoring service. When new images become available, the<br />

system must be able to process them automatically, adjusting for clouds, rainfall, haze, and<br />

seasons, while still presenting useful images to the observer. The goal should be to reduce<br />

the amount of expert input as much as possible through automation. The expert group may<br />

also need to vet subscriptions.<br />

Once a subscription is established the system must discover any new imagery that covers the<br />

conservation area of interest as soon as it is published. This calls for an automated ‘satellite<br />

spider’ to troll the databases of earth monitoring providers round the clock and to check the<br />

metadata describing new images to determine if they are relevant to an area of interest.<br />

Satellite images are large, and require processing before they are useful for detecting changes<br />

to forest canopy. The spider does not download the images, just the metadata necessary to<br />

check if they are relevant. When a new relevant image is found, the spider signals the<br />

processing engine.<br />

The processing engine fetches the new image, and performs the necessary adjustments, such<br />

as atmospheric correction; cloud detection; ortho-rectification and forest-cover spectral<br />

analysis. The actual steps depend on the satellite, sensor, and band and whether these steps<br />

have already been completed by the data provider.<br />

Once the image has been processed into a map showing forest cover, it is necessary to access<br />

older images or maps of the same place so that a comparison can be made. This is used to<br />

detect recent changes, either manually by an observer or using a forest-change algorithm.<br />

Finally the processing engine signals to the task manager.<br />

The Task Manager creates a new observation task and emails or tweets the volunteer using<br />

the following template:<br />

Dear , A new image is available for . The image was created<br />

on . You task is to look for recent changes to forest cover and file a report by . Click on this link to start your task before or click here if you are unable to<br />

start this task.<br />

The link opens a web application showing both the new and old images covering the area of<br />

interest. The area to be inspected is clearly outlined. Any areas where the forest-change<br />

algorithm has detected recent change are also highlighted. The observer is repeatedly tasked<br />

with reviewing the same area on a regular basis, and only needs to identify whether the change<br />

indicates a disturbance in that area. Basic training in image classification can be provided as an<br />

online course with completion being part of the registration process for observers.<br />

The volunteer can mark or outline any disturbance she sees using a small set of mark-up tools.<br />

She then adds a description to the place-mark, such as ‘new road’ ‘fire’, ‘crops’ or ‘clearing’.<br />

These place-marked descriptions are automatically collated into a disturbance report. When<br />

finished, she reviews the report and clicks send. If no disturbances are observed she files an<br />

empty report to complete the task. If unsure about a change, she may mark the location with a<br />

question for a more experienced observer to review and complete the task.<br />

On completing her task she immediately receives encouraging feedback and a summary of<br />

her cumulative activity and credits, as well as a list of other tasks that may be attempted.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

Other tasks can include online training, or assisting other volunteers. These interactions<br />

reinforce the volunteers’ motivation to remain active.<br />

If any disturbance is reported, the system sends an email or text message alerting the local<br />

group. The direct contact details of local groups and volunteers are shielded in the system.<br />

The report includes the description and coordinates of each disturbance. If the group has<br />

Internet access, they may also review the raw images and maps in a web application, or a<br />

low-resolution version if bandwidth is limited.<br />

The local group acts on the report according to their judgement and resources. The local<br />

group may also forward the report to an enforcement agency, or send a ranger to investigate<br />

on the ground. They should not be pressured into actions by volunteers from the relative<br />

safety of a foreign country.<br />

The service asks the local group to respond to each report. The response can be via return<br />

email or text, or online. Each response is stored with the report to ensure transparency and<br />

to assist with accuracy and other issues. While a no comment response is allowed in some<br />

circumstances, the groups are encouraged to include in the responses the accuracy and<br />

utility of the report, what investigations were performed and describe any steps taken to<br />

deter future disturbances. This feedback helps the service improve. The local group may<br />

also update the integrated wiki of their area at any time.<br />

6. Architecture<br />

This section describes the main components of the proposed system.<br />

Because the system aims to provide a free service to local groups, while keeping volunteers<br />

engaged, usability is a primary concern. Difficult to follow instructions and slow or erratic<br />

responses must be avoided. All interactions must be self-explanatory and support multiple<br />

languages.<br />

6.1 Subscription manager<br />

This module handles requests from a local group to protect a conservation area and<br />

manages the steps in the subscription process. It also manages the local group's secure<br />

online account. Each subscription must include at least the following data before reports can<br />

be generated:<br />

Coordinates of the area of interest;<br />

Contact details to send reports;<br />

Report media supported (Fax, SMS, MMS, Email, Hi Def Web, Smart-phone);<br />

A name for the Local Group;<br />

Preferred language and other languages spoken;<br />

A unique name of the area of interest, such as a park or local name;<br />

Aims of the monitoring project;<br />

A commitment to use the reports to prevent deforestation.<br />

The subscription manager may also capture:<br />

Sponsoring NGO & contact details, if applicable;<br />

The local group's access to technology such as GPS, broadband or smart-phones;<br />

A means to hide the base location and identity of the local group behind an intermediary,<br />

such as an NGO should be available when requested.<br />

241


242<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The Subscription Manager also generates a geo-wiki for each subscription and encourages<br />

the local group to add further information to complete a profile of their land. To make<br />

subscriptions easier, this need not be completed immediately. This wiki template has<br />

sections for:<br />

Describing the area, e.g. geography, ecology, history, threats;<br />

Identifying any priority conservation areas within the area of interest, such as critical<br />

habitats;<br />

Uploading photos, stories, expert reports, and biographies of locals (if safe to do so);<br />

Visitor stories and photos.<br />

The site geo-wiki is moderated by the local group (or their NGO partner) so anyone can<br />

contribute. Each subscription also has a message forum dedicated to it, for sharing<br />

intelligence about the local area. This would be in the local group’s language. The moderator<br />

also has the option to request the boundary of the area of interest be nominated for inclusion<br />

in the World Database on Protected Areas [protectedplanet.net]. Conversely, if the protected<br />

area is already recorded in the database, then the subscription manager should be able to<br />

import this definition.<br />

6.2 Satellite data service<br />

There are many high resolution satellites from multiple providers. Satellite sensors such as<br />

Landsat TM and ETM+ (USA), Terra ASTER (USA-Japan), CBERS-2 (China-Brazil), SPOT<br />

MSS (France), and IRS-2 (<strong>India</strong>) provide data required for high resolution mapping of<br />

deforestation, logging, and other tropical forest disturbances (Defries et al., 2009). Each<br />

sensor has its own characteristics, making it more difficult to compare scenes.<br />

The coordinates of subscribed areas may be submitted to the satellite operator’s mission<br />

planners to increase the probability or frequency that the site will be scanned.<br />

The application does not access the satellites directly, but relies on public data providers<br />

such as USGS, ESA, JAXA and INPE.<br />

For rapid detection, the properties to look for in a satellite data service are:<br />

Covers the area of interest;<br />

Sensor has a suitable resolution and frequency bands;<br />

New images are continuously acquired at reasonable frequency;<br />

Data is (or can be) geometrically and radiometrically corrected;<br />

New data is processed and published as soon as it is captured;<br />

A notification service is available, containing meta-data describing the images, so that a<br />

spider can be configured to discover images;<br />

Meta-data is published using open standards;<br />

Free access to the public or at least copy-controlled access for not-for-profits at no cost.<br />

If free public access is not available, it may still be possible to negotiate restricted access that<br />

allows the application to create and display deforestation maps without sharing the raw<br />

data files.<br />

6.3 Satellite spider<br />

The satellite spider is a component of the application that continually looks for new<br />

images covering each subscribed area of interest. The spider maintains the coordinates of<br />

all active subscription areas. It trawls the image meta-data on online databases. It requires<br />

a separate ‘plug-in’ for each satellite data service supported. For example, USGS supports


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

an RSS service that allows the spider to read an XML data feed describing the latest<br />

LANDSAT data [landsat.usgs.gov/Landsat7.rss]. The spider must convert from latitude<br />

and longitude of the area of interest to the path and row of the satellite [glovis.gov]. Other<br />

providers may offer a Web Map Service (WMS). The spider runs 24/7 but does not<br />

actually download or process any images. Each time a new image is found that is relevant<br />

to monitoring an area of interest, the spider sends a request to the processing engine to<br />

download it and create a map.<br />

6.4 Image processing engine<br />

The image processing engine must download images found by the spider, process them<br />

automatically into forest-change maps and store them in a map server.<br />

The processing algorithms used are no different from those developed for existing detection<br />

systems, i.e. ortho-rectification, geo-registration, atmospheric correction, cloud removal,<br />

NDVI spectral analysis or ‘unmixing’.<br />

The processing engine has significant bandwidth and computation requirements and must<br />

be cloud hosted to avoid infrastructure maintenance.<br />

The Google Earth Engine API promises to provide much of this functionality. Alternative<br />

toolkits are available to do processing. Amazon.com could be used for cloud storage and<br />

computation.<br />

While a variety of sensors, data products and algorithms exist, the processing engine should<br />

aim to present a consistent display, independent of these factors. For example, a standard<br />

colour scheme and legend could be used to classify disturbance types. For a non-expert, the<br />

most easily understood imagery is high-resolution natural colour such as seen on Google<br />

Earth. However they are not updated regularly on Google Earth. Also, this is not the best<br />

format for detecting forest disturbance. Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)<br />

images can complement visual images. Fire alerts should be integrated into the community<br />

based monitoring service. Existing fire detection systems based on MODIS, such as Indofire<br />

(Landgate, 2009) could be interrogated daily and send alerts to the volunteer and local<br />

group if a fire is detected near the area of interest. Fires are highly correlated with<br />

deforestation in many countries, depending on agricultural practices.<br />

Once the processing engine has created the map it signals the workflow system to create an<br />

observation task.<br />

6.5 Map server<br />

The Processing Engine stores new maps in a map server. The map server must keep a timeseries<br />

archive of forest-change maps and images for each area of interest, as well as<br />

disturbance reports, place-marks and corresponding responses from local groups. The map<br />

server does not need to store raw satellite data that is available elsewhere.<br />

When a volunteer is conducting an observation task, the Observation <strong>Portal</strong> requests maps<br />

from the map server to be displayed using an established API. Responsiveness to these data<br />

requests is important to the volunteer's experience of the Observation <strong>Portal</strong>.<br />

6.6 Volunteer manager<br />

This module handles requests from volunteers to register, and it manages their account and<br />

profile. Their real identity should be secured by the system. The manager records which<br />

243


244<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

languages are spoken and the preferred countries or regions in which the user may wish to<br />

volunteer.<br />

The Volunteer Manager keeps track of tasks assigned and completed and any training the<br />

volunteer completes. It suggests available e-courses in which the volunteer can enroll.<br />

Volunteers may self-register and deregister, and edit most of their profile, but not their<br />

qualifications, ratings or feedback.<br />

Volunteers must pass some basic training and assessment, and agree to a code of conduct<br />

before qualifying. Observation tasks are only assigned to qualified volunteers.<br />

6.7 Observation portal<br />

The Observation <strong>Portal</strong> is a web application for comparing images and annotating<br />

disturbances. It could be built on existing geographic display tools such as OpenLayers or<br />

Google Maps.<br />

The Observation <strong>Portal</strong> must be configured to assist the volunteer complete the observation<br />

task. The link embedded in the volunteer’s email (or tweet) should open the portal at the<br />

correct coordinates and zoom, and display the correct layers to show the latest image and<br />

differences to previous images. Also displayed are any enhancements, such as fire detection,<br />

or outputs of automatic deforestation detection systems if available. The date each image<br />

was captured, the task id and due date are shown by default. The boundaries of the area of<br />

interest and relevant park boundaries should be displayed.<br />

It is crucial this is displayed automatically as soon as the user clicks the task-link in their<br />

email. Expecting volunteers to navigate to an online database, find, order and download<br />

images, then load them into the viewer would lead to a high failure rate. These defaults<br />

must either be setup automatically, or be preset by an expert when a subscription is<br />

created.<br />

Correct initial settings allow the novice volunteer to concentrate on observation rather than<br />

learning and adjusting the tools. Zooming, panning and selecting from a small set of layers<br />

are essential for the task.<br />

The user has options to display meta-data if desired, such as the sensor, band and<br />

processing steps. They may also call up earlier reports, images or maps that outline earlier<br />

disturbances, or predefined elements such as roads or management boundaries. Protected<br />

area boundaries may be accessed from online resources such as the World Database on<br />

Protected Areas [protectedplanet.net] via the Subscription Manager.<br />

The user experience is simplified down to just the graphic elements necessary to help the<br />

novice user to complete the current task, rather than present a rich and complex GIS<br />

interface.<br />

Why use human observers to compare the before and after images when automatic<br />

detection is possible?<br />

Firstly, because automatic detection can only create a map. It must still be interpreted by<br />

humans. Although the algorithm could send alerts automatically, the local group may need<br />

to analyse to check for false alarms. Secondly, volunteers may also become advocates. By<br />

exposing illegal deforestation to a globally connected audience, they increase awareness and<br />

engagement beyond national and bureaucratic hierarchies. New international networks<br />

among local groups and volunteers may help embolden local authorities and communities<br />

to better protect forests.<br />

One way to visually compare images or maps is to view them side-by-side. One service that<br />

demonstrates this technique is AnotherEarth.org (Firth, 2011). It displays two Google Earth


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

javascript windows side-by-side in a browser. Both new and old imagery is displayed from<br />

an identical viewpoint. Panning or zooming one window will pan or zoom the other to the<br />

same viewpoint. Because the images are geo-referenced, aligning old and new images can<br />

be automated and differences easily observed. Another technique is the before-after rollover<br />

developed by Andrew Kesper at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation to show the<br />

changes following natural disasters (Kesper, 2011). Other techniques include flicking or<br />

fading between images. Research on user preference and performance is required to<br />

determine the best methods.<br />

The Observation <strong>Portal</strong> also presents a reporting panel to the user. This contains a simple<br />

set of screen icons for drawing point, line or polygon place-marks. Each new place-mark<br />

or polygon includes a standard form for classifying disturbance types as well as free text<br />

annotations. The date, observer and task id is recorded automatically in each place-mark.<br />

The observer may create multiple place-marks for a single disturbance report, and may<br />

edit them until the task is sent. Once sent, the report can only be edited under version<br />

control.<br />

Completing the task is simply a matter of pressing ‘Send’, as the Workflow System<br />

automatically distributes the report, and ensures it is recorded and a response received.<br />

The reporting panel is implemented using a standard GIS toolkit.<br />

6.8 Report manager<br />

“A final important element is the portal for integration of ground-sampled data into this platform;<br />

including data from smartphones used in trials in community-based forest monitoring”<br />

REDD Sourcebook (GOFC-GOLD, 2010)<br />

This module manages the collection, storage and transmission of disturbance reports created<br />

by volunteers in the Observation <strong>Portal</strong>. It delivers the report to the local group, using the<br />

agreed contact details and method (email, text). The report manager also requests and<br />

manages feedback from the local group to rate the accuracy of each report and record any<br />

activities the local group made in response to the disturbance.<br />

The report manager archives all the reports relating to each protected area. Both the reports<br />

and associated feedback are stored in the geo-wiki for the area of interest, together with any<br />

maps created by the processing engine. They may be used for future research or tuning the<br />

system. They can be searched geographically, visually, temporally, by disturbance type or<br />

by volunteer.<br />

The Report Manager can translate standard fields in the report if there is a mismatch between<br />

the language of the report and the recipients. Automatic translation within major languages<br />

could be integrated. Other translations would need to be referred to a regional NGO.<br />

A disturbance report will contain:<br />

a reference to the originating task - so all task parameters are archived;<br />

the handle of the volunteer who completed the task, which links to their public profile;<br />

the time and date the report was completed;<br />

geo-referenced place-marks created by the volunteer;<br />

completed forms and annotations created by the volunteer for each place-mark;<br />

severity of the disturbance – from minor to serious;<br />

observer’s confidence of the accuracy of the disturbance.<br />

Once a local group responds, the report may also contain:<br />

veracity response: indicates whether the observation indicated a real change or not;<br />

245


246<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

accuracy response: how accurate were the coordinates in the report. This may help<br />

detect alignment issues;<br />

conservation value of the information - whether it helped reduce impacts;<br />

comments or photos uploaded by the local group or NGO;<br />

actions taken, such as referrals to law enforcement.<br />

A response may be entered directly by the local group if they have web or smart-phone<br />

access, or by the NGO. The response may also add comments to the volunteer's report.<br />

Even when the local group has no GPS or other capability to record coordinates in their<br />

response, their text or photos can still be referenced back to the original disturbance report,<br />

and therefore indirectly geo-referenced.<br />

Local groups can also forward reports to enforcement agencies. Carlos Souza of Imazon<br />

describes a reporting system that will “allow users to … be able to identify cases of illegal<br />

deforestation that are being judged, send requests, as protests, to prioritize cases with the<br />

environmental agencies and courts, monitor the length of the proceedings, and receive alerts<br />

about the status of the process. We hope that this type of geo-wiki tool can engage civil<br />

society in order to accelerate the cases and bring positive pressure on the enforcement<br />

system to properly punish violators. This is important, because the application of<br />

enforcement law represents the major bottleneck to stopping illegal deforestation in the<br />

Brazilian Amazon” (Souza et al., 2009).<br />

6.9 Workflow system<br />

The workflow is the central control process that keeps the system alive by responding to<br />

external events and ensuring tasks are created, assigned and completed. The workflow<br />

ensures new data is processed, tasks are assigned and reports reach the people on the<br />

ground quickly and reliably. A good workflow system allows business rules and process<br />

logic to be encoded in a flexible but rigorous language, rather than buried in code.<br />

Yet Another Workflow Language (YAWL) is one open-source workflow language and<br />

implementation (Hofstede et al., 2008).<br />

Workflow systems are now commonplace in corporate enterprises to encode and automate<br />

business processes. Examples include defect management systems. Workflow systems can<br />

also facilitate virtual organisations, such as open-source software collaboration teams. A<br />

workflow typically describes an artefact as it is transferred from one stage to another.<br />

For this forest monitoring application, the flows would describe a raw or processed satellite<br />

image, an observation task, or a report. The workflow system assigns tasks to people or<br />

groups; manages the scheduling and email notification system; and supports resolution,<br />

escalation and exception processes.<br />

A new task is triggered when a new forest-change map is ready. The system assigns an<br />

observation task to the selected volunteer. The observation task may be reassigned to<br />

another volunteer if it remains in a queue for too long, or if the first volunteer requests a<br />

review. When a disturbance report is created, a new task ensures that it is sent to and<br />

acknowledged by the correct local group, and also ensures the local group sends a response<br />

within a reasonable time.<br />

Within this basic flow are many alternate possibilities, exceptions and error cases. A flexible<br />

workflow engine allows core behaviours to be reconfigured to suit ad-hoc organisations as<br />

they evolve. There is no reason to limit Bunjil Forest Watch to a single instance. Different<br />

groups may find reasons to build and deploy variations to meet unforeseen needs.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

6.10 The social network<br />

A community-based forest monitoring system needs a wiki to encourage and strengthen<br />

community ties and share information. Social network software must be integrated into the<br />

solution to allow volunteers to interact with other volunteers, local groups, experts and the<br />

public, and to develop monitoring skills.<br />

The social network tools consist of a geo-wiki for each local group and subscribed area, a<br />

public profile page and optional blog for each volunteer, a general wiki for the application<br />

user guide, FAQ and support in multiple languages, and a discussion forum for posting<br />

questions and defects.<br />

Many of the interactions are automatically generated by workflow tasks. A user’s reputation<br />

is updated each time one of their reports is verified. Reports and photos uploaded by local<br />

groups may be automatically added to the site wiki and geo-located with the original<br />

disturbance report. Other interactions are initiated by users or prompted by the workflow,<br />

to keep the geo-wiki up-to-date.<br />

The social network could be implemented by customising an existing open-source Content<br />

Management System (CMS), such as Radiant or Wordpress. There are many mass-market<br />

social network sites; however a high level of integration and customisation is required to<br />

integrate with the workflow and keep the focus on the tasks. The social network must<br />

support volunteers and local groups to combat deforestation.<br />

The site geo-wiki could well be integrated into the UNEP’s ProtectedPlanet<br />

[protectedplanet.net] or Atlas of Our Changing <strong>Environment</strong> [na.unep.net/atlas/google.php].<br />

These global Wikis already have much of the functionality required to define a communitybased<br />

protected area, add to a blog, and upload geo-located photos. Using existing<br />

infrastructure is easier than creating a new site, provided the workflow integration can be<br />

achieved. The social network could also link to content in relevant environment sites such as<br />

Mongobay.com or GloboAmazonia.com.<br />

Each volunteer has a profile page and optional blog for sharing stories about the observing<br />

experience. A volunteer’s real identity can be hidden, but their online reputation as a<br />

volunteer is tracked, including the punctuality, reliability and accuracy of their reports.<br />

6.11 Online learning<br />

Bunjil Forest Watch will rely on a Learning Management System (LMS) to manage online<br />

and collaborative training for volunteers. This includes a wiki, forum, course material,<br />

videos and exams. The main purpose of the online learning module is to improve<br />

volunteers’ observation skills and knowledge. The need for training users has been<br />

identified by both the CLASlite and IMAZON teams.<br />

The training describes a volunteer’s responsibilities and shows examples to help illustrate<br />

the kind of satellite images or maps the student will be likely to encounter and the sorts of<br />

changes to look out for. The training also shows how to create a report.<br />

To qualify as an observer, the volunteer must complete an online test where they review<br />

pre-analysed images and correctly identify threats. Further training is available to retain and<br />

increase competency and to broaden knowledge in subjects relevant to forest monitoring,<br />

for example forest ecology; remote sensing; sustainable development or cross cultural<br />

communication. Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia – IPAM, have an online course<br />

on The Amazon Rainforest and Climate Change. [ipam.org.br/curso/login]<br />

247


248<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Volunteers must complete some online training to qualify as an observer. Only qualified<br />

observers receive real assignments and can send reports. This is to discourage uncommitted<br />

and unreliable users.<br />

Volunteers receive credits as they complete training modules. They also receive credits as<br />

they successfully perform observation tasks. Credits increase the volunteer’s grading. This<br />

allows volunteers to perform more critical tasks and assist or review others.<br />

The Learning Management System manages the syllabus of courses; enrolment in e-courses;<br />

and serves the training and examination material. The LMS can also be based on opensource<br />

software for example Chamilo [chamilo.org], Wikiversity [wikiversity.org] or Khan<br />

Academy [khanacademy.org].<br />

Volunteers can also create course material for other users.<br />

Local groups can also access the training. Unlike volunteers, they are not required to<br />

complete training to receive reports.<br />

7. Discussion<br />

7.1 Mobiles and Smart-phones<br />

Local groups are not required to have knowledge of GIS, or remote sensing, but often will<br />

have access to a mobile phone and be within mobile range. Africa has already achieved 50%<br />

mobile phone penetration, rising at 20% pa. "Smart" phones with GPS and camera are now a<br />

mass-market technology in developed countries, but may remain too expensive for many<br />

local groups in developing countries for some years. However, a phone “app”, would<br />

greatly improve the utility of the service. It would incorporate the deforestation report, the<br />

original forest change map, and a GPS to direct the group directly to the disturbance. Using<br />

camera, messaging and GPS it would be simpler to file a response that is automatically and<br />

reliably cross-referenced and geo-located in time and space.<br />

Open Data Kit [opendatakit.org] by the University of Washington and Google.org is an opensource<br />

multilingual suite of mobile data collection tools for the Android platform. Woods Hole<br />

Research Centre has trialled the technology for collecting data from REDD forest plots.<br />

Smart- phones will greatly assist collecting reliable evidence for both scientific and enforcement<br />

purposes. The smart-phone app could be included as an enhancement, but making access to a<br />

smart-phone a requirement for participation risks limiting access to many groups.<br />

7.2 Accuracy<br />

"There has to be trust in the forest-monitoring data, and these nations have to see them as their<br />

own …There's this face-to-face collaboration that is really critical."<br />

Dan Nepstad, quoted in Nature (Tollefson, 2009)<br />

Volunteers, even with auto detection algorithms, still face a big challenge to correctly<br />

interpret the imagery, and distinguish a significant disturbance from artefacts such as data<br />

errors, seasonal variations or variations in viewing conditions. The generation of images is<br />

unsupervised and the viewer self-trained. This increases the likelihood of errors.<br />

Quality control is important to reduce incorrect reports. False positives create unnecessary<br />

work and travel for the local group while false negatives mean disturbances are not picked<br />

up. Opponents of the local group can use errors or inconsistencies to undermine the reports.<br />

Maps prepared automatically for alerting may not reach the standards required for longterm<br />

REDD Monitoring, Reporting & Verification (MRV). But they may not be required to<br />

since a more rigorously controlled analysis can still be created later to prosecute a case.


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

The usual way to measure the accuracy of a new system is to compare the results with<br />

known data. A pilot of the system can be chosen to overlap with an established regional<br />

monitoring program and the results can be compared.<br />

Additionally, as this system is repeatedly monitoring for change over fixed but relatively<br />

small areas, there is an opportunity to introduce self-correcting feedback. Ensuring the local<br />

users of the service report back to the observer on the quality of the reports gives a very<br />

good guide to the accuracy and performance of the system.<br />

This is why local groups must rate the quality of each report they receive. The responses are<br />

automatically collated and generate statistics on each volunteer as they become more<br />

experienced. The reputation of the observers and local groups accumulate with each<br />

transaction. This feedback helps tune the service to identify poorly performing volunteers,<br />

unresponsive local groups, common false alarms and system biases or failures.<br />

7.3 Public access<br />

While the LANDSAT archive and other data are publicly available online, a conservation<br />

monitoring service may also need access to higher resolution imagery. High-resolution visual<br />

images may be easier for non-experts to understand. However there are trade-offs in costs,<br />

temporal resolution (frequency) and bandwidth. Many deforestation detection systems<br />

combine multiple sensors to make a statistical estimate of where deforestation is occurring.<br />

However, the critical factor for alerts is timeliness. The main business model for most highresolution<br />

satellite providers is providing data to governments. Providing data for<br />

deforestation in remote areas, with suitable checks and balances, would not undermine this<br />

model and may enhance the reputation of the provider. For example, the GeoEye Foundation<br />

provides access to IKONOS (0.5m) resolution imagery to NGO’s for humanitarian purposes.<br />

After access to data, the next greatest issue is access to the technology to process the data.<br />

Fortunately, the owners and creators of the worlds most advanced forest monitoring<br />

systems share this aim. Increasingly, research is being published in open journals accessible<br />

to non-institutional scientists.<br />

Another hurdle is access to computing capacity to produce the images. It is significant, but<br />

not unachievable. The cloud computing paradigm for IT infrastructure is applicable to this<br />

application. There may be infrastructure providers prepared to offer free access during lowdemand<br />

for not-for-profit applications. Google’s aforementioned commitment to donate ten<br />

million hours of CPU time per year is promising.<br />

The interactive sessions must run as on-demand services, but these are data rather than<br />

computationally intensive.<br />

7.4 Costs<br />

The cost of computation continues to fall while speed continues to increase but removing all<br />

costs to local groups and volunteers is essential.<br />

The registration and subscription processes ensure that no image is downloaded or<br />

processed unless there is a local group prepared to protect the area and there is a volunteer<br />

prepared to observe the images on a regular basis. This avoids wasted computation and<br />

data transfer as areas outside the area of interest are masked out of the calculation.<br />

Obtaining regularly updated imagery at low cost is one of the key challenges. In 2008 the<br />

USGS made a decision that was a watershed for open access by providing free online<br />

LANDSAT data. Unfortunately, barriers to accessing the data remain, especially in Africa<br />

249


250<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

where international bandwidth is limited (Roy et al., 2010). Barriers include limited tertiary<br />

education, especially in remote-sensing fields; conflicting national interests and priorities;<br />

inadequate awareness of potential uses; insufficient infrastructure and high data costs.<br />

The cost of implementing and maintaining the service must also be addressed. It is likely to<br />

be developed in a series of prototypes of increasing functionality.<br />

7.5 Displacement<br />

Although protected reserves reduce deforestation rates, they may not eliminate<br />

deforestation in the reserve completely (Clark et al., 2008). Displacement of deforestation<br />

occurs when an area is protected but its surroundings are not. If the area is reserved as a<br />

carbon bank then displacement is undesirable as emissions are merely moved rather than<br />

reduced. However displacement may be desirable if the purpose of the park is to protect a<br />

unique biodiverse area. For example, encouraging palm plantation corporations to shift<br />

expansions to areas already degraded by earlier logging, without destroying more primary<br />

forest, benefits both biodiversity and climate goals.<br />

8. Conclusion<br />

We can encode the motto think global act local into the DNA of our next generation of Earth<br />

observation infrastructure. This promises to open a new global front to combat illegal<br />

deforestation and degradation.<br />

The solution described here could be built from existing open-source components, hosted on<br />

cloud infrastructure. More and more satellite imagery is freely available on public<br />

databases, and methods to process the images are advancing. This paper has described one<br />

way that these available resources could be put to better use.<br />

9. References<br />

Ackland, R.; O'Neil, M.; Bimber, B.; Gibson, R. & Ward, S. (2006). New Methods for<br />

Studying Online <strong>Environment</strong>al-Activist Networks. Virtual Observatory for the<br />

Study of Online Networks (VOSON). 26th International Sunbelt Social Network<br />

Conference, Vancouver. April 2006.<br />

http://voson.anu.edu.au/papers/environmental_activists_methods_presentation.pdf<br />

Aliança da Terra; Amigos da Terra; Instituto Centro de Vida; IMAZON; IPAM; Instituto<br />

SocioAmbiental; Nucleo de Estudos e Prática Jurídica Ambiental; Faculdade de<br />

Direito -- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; Woods Hole Research Center.<br />

(2007). Three Essential Strategies For Reducing Deforestation.<br />

http://www.whrc.org/policy/pdf/cop13/3-Strategies-Dec-07.pdf<br />

Asner, G.P.; Knapp, D.E.; Balaji, A. & Paez-Acosta, G. (2009). Automated mapping of<br />

tropical deforestation and forest degradation: CLASlite. Journal of Applied Remote<br />

Sensing 3:033543.<br />

BBC (9 May 2011). Brazil: Amazon rainforest deforestation rises sharply.<br />

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-13449792.<br />

Broich, M.; Hansen, M.; Stolle, F.; Potapov, P.; Margono, B. & Adusei, B. (2011). Remotely<br />

sensed forest cover loss shows high spatial and temporal variation across Sumatra<br />

and Kalimantan, Indonesia 2000–2008. Environ. Research Letters V6 (January-March<br />

2011) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014010


Bunjil Forest Watch a Community-Based Forest Monitoring Service<br />

Brown, David W. (2011). Why Governments Fail to Capture Economic Rent: The Unofficial<br />

Appropriation of Rain Forest Rent by Rulers in Insular Southeast Asia Between<br />

1970 and 1999. PhD. Dissertation.<br />

Carnegie. (2008). Carnegie Science, press release, Dec 4 2008,<br />

carnegiescience.edu/news/tropical_forest_carbon_monitoring_gets_big_boost<br />

Chadwick, A. & Howard, P. (2009). Handbook of Internet Politics, Routledge<br />

Clark, S.; Bolt, K. & Campbell, A. (2008). Protected areas: an effective tool to reduce<br />

emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries?<br />

Working Paper, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.<br />

www.unep-wcmc.org/medialibrary/2010/10/05/2a7f53e5/Clark_et_al_2008.pdf<br />

CLASlite (2009) Peralvo, M., quoted in CLASlite Capacity Building website, Accessed Oct<br />

2011. claslite.ciw.edu/en/action/training.html<br />

Dangl, B. (2011). The bloody cost of Amazon deforestation. The Guardian. (June 12 2011)<br />

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jun/12/brazil-amazonrainforest<br />

DeFries, R.; Asner, G.; Achard, F.; Justice, C.; Laporte, N.; Price, K.; Small, C. & Townshend,<br />

J. (2009). Monitoring Tropical Deforestation For Emerging Carbon Markets. In:<br />

Reduction of Tropical Deforestation and Climate Change Mitigation, Mountinho P. &<br />

Schwartzman S. (Eds).<br />

Escada, M.; Maurano, L.; Rennó, C.; Amaral, S. & Valeriano, D. (2011). Evaluation of data<br />

from Early Warning Systems Amazon: DETER and SAD, ‘Avaliação de dados dos<br />

Sistemas de Alerta da Amazônia: DETER e SAD’, Anais XV Simpósio Brasileiro de<br />

Sensoriamento Remoto - SBSR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil, 30 de abril a 05 de maio de 2011<br />

Firth, J. (2011). Another Earth. anotherearth.org<br />

GOFC-GOLD. (2010). A sourcebook of methods and procedures for monitoring and<br />

reporting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and removals caused by<br />

deforestation, gains and losses of carbon stocks in forests remaining forests, and<br />

forestation. Global Observation of Forest and Land Cover Dynamics. www.gofcgold.uni-jena.de/redd/sourcebook/Sourcebook_Version_Nov_2010_cop16-1.pdf<br />

Goodman, C. (2010). Bunjil – A social network for proactive monitoring of tropical<br />

rainforests. Telecommunications Journal of Australia. 60 (1): pp. 4.1 to 4.16. DOI:<br />

10.2104/tja10004. Available online.<br />

Google.org. (2010). Presentation to WorldBank, undated. Available Online<br />

web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTARD/0,,contentMDK:22<br />

555701~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:336682,00.html<br />

Hammer, D.; Kraft, R. & Wheeler, D. (2009). Forest Monitoring for Action - Rapid<br />

Identification of Pan-tropical Deforestation Using Moderate-Resolution Remotely<br />

Sensed Data. Centre for Global Development www.cgdev.org.<br />

Hofstede, A.; Aalst, W.; Adams, M. & Russell, N. (2008) Modern Business Process<br />

Automation: YAWL and its Support <strong>Environment</strong>. Updated 2011. Available Online<br />

at: www.yawlfoundation.org<br />

IUCN. World Database on Protected Areas. A joint initiative between IUCN and UNEP<br />

WCMC. www.protectedplanet.net,<br />

Kellndorfer, J. (2008). New Eyes in the Sky: Cloud-Free Tropical Forest Monitoring for<br />

REDD with the Japanese Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS). Woods Hole<br />

Research Centre, UNFCC-COP15. Bali, Dec 2007.<br />

www.whrc.org/policy/pdf/cop13/Bali_ALOS.pdf<br />

Kesper, A. (2011). Australian Broadcasting Corporation.<br />

www.abc.net.au/news/specials/japan-quake-2011/<br />

251


252<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Knapp, D. (Dec 4, 2008). quoted in Mongobay, ‘Rainforest canopy-penetrating technology<br />

gets boost for forest carbon monitoring', Mongobay Dec 4, 2008.<br />

news.mongabay.com/2008/1204-asner.html<br />

La Rocca, S. (2004). Making a Difference, Factors that influence participation in grassroots<br />

environmental activism in Australia. PhD Dissertation. Available online at The<br />

Change Agency, www.thechangeagency.org/01_cms/details.asp?ID=13<br />

Landgate. (2009). Indofire, West Australian Land Authority.<br />

indofire.landgate.wa.gov.au/indofire.asp<br />

Malaysia Today. (March, 2011). Malaysia Today: WE RELEASE <strong>THE</strong> LAND GRAB DATA!<br />

malaysia-today.net/archives/archives-2011/38921-we-release-the-land-grab-data<br />

May, A. (May 25, 2008). Brazil Rainforest Analysis Sets Off Political Debate. New York Times.<br />

www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/world/americas/25amazon.html?pagewanted=all<br />

Nepstad, et al. (2009). The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Science 4 December<br />

2009: 326 (5958), 1350-1351. [DOI:10.1126/science.1182108]<br />

Phelps, J.; Webb, E. & Agrawal A. (2010). Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest<br />

Governance? Science (16 April 2010): Vol. 328 no. 5976 pp. 312-313 DOI:<br />

10.1126/science.1187774, www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5976/312.summary<br />

Rajão, R. & Hayes, N. (2009). Conceptions of control and IT artifacts: an institutional account<br />

of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. Journal of Information Technology, 24<br />

(4) pp. 320-331],<br />

ufmg.academia.edu/raonirajao/Papers/127750/Conceptions_of_control_and_IT_a<br />

rtefacts_an_institutional_account_of_the_Amazon_rainforest_monitoring_system<br />

Regalado, A. (2010). New Google Earth Engine. ScienceInsider, 3 December 2010.<br />

news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/12/new-google-earth-engine.html<br />

Roy, D.; Ju, J.; Mbow, C.; Frost, P. & Loveland, T. (2010). Accessing free Landsat data via the<br />

Internet : Africa’s challenge, Remote Sensing Letters, (Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010),<br />

DOI:10.1080/01431160903486693, pages 111-117 Available online<br />

Sales, M.; Souza, C. & Hayashi, S. (August 25, 2011). Risk of Deforestation. Edition 2, August<br />

2011-July 2012. IMAZON, ‘Boletim Risco de Desmatamento Agosto de 2011 a Julho de<br />

2012’ Reported in ‘Model predicts deforestation hot spots in Brazilian Amazon’<br />

Moukaddem, K. mongabay.com news.<br />

mongabay.com/2011/0825-moukaddem_imazon_forecast.html<br />

Souza, C.; Pereira, K.; Lins, V.; Haiashy, S. & Souza, D. (2009). Web-oriented GIS system for<br />

monitoring, conservation and law enforcement of the Brazilian Amazon. Earth Sci<br />

Inform. 2:205–215. DOI 10.1007/s12145-009-0035-6<br />

www.springerlink.com/content/e1g673k21k168591/fulltext.pdf<br />

Tollefson, J. (2009). Climate: Counting carbon in the Amazon. Nature 461, 1048-1052 (2009) |<br />

doi:10.1038/4611048a , Published online 21 October 2009.<br />

nature.com/news/2009/091021/full/4611048a.html<br />

Ushahidi (2011). CrowdMap. Ushadihi.org.


13<br />

Remnant Vegetation Analysis<br />

of Guanabara Bay Basin, Rio de Janeiro,<br />

Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Luzia Alice Ferreira de Moraes<br />

Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro UNIRIO<br />

Brasil<br />

The importance of tropical forests and the surrounding environment has been increasing, as<br />

specific threats and problems (e.g. deforestation, timber logging, infrastructure development,<br />

and mining) are generating increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, with severe<br />

present and future consequences in climate (Schulze in Carreiras et al., 2006).<br />

Rio de Janeiro is a Brazilian state that presents the greatest diversity of ecosystems,<br />

including major portions of Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlântica in Portuguese), considered a<br />

hotspot for its importance and relevance in terms of natural resources and biodiversity.<br />

The high biodiversity in this biome is a function of the extreme variations in<br />

environmental conditions, and great differences in altitude, ranging from sea level to over<br />

1800 meters.<br />

The Atlantic Forest domain has the following delimitations established by the Brazilian<br />

Vegetation Map of IBGE (Veloso et al., 1991): ombrophilous dense Atlantic Forest; mixed<br />

ombrophilous forests; open ombrophilous forests; semidecidual stational forests; decidual<br />

stational forests; the countryside swamps, the northeastern forest enclaves (regionally called<br />

"brejos") and the associated ecosystems - mangroves and restingas.<br />

According to publication of SOS Atlantic Forest Foundation and the Brazilian National<br />

Institute for Space Research (2009) between 2005 and 2009, there was a loss of 1,039 hectares<br />

of Atlantic Forest in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The Forest is now fragmented in isolated<br />

remnants scattered throughout a landscape dominated by agricultural uses. According to<br />

Grimm et al. (2008), ecosystem responses to land changes are complex and integrated,<br />

occurring on all spatial and temporal scales as a consequence of connectivity of resources,<br />

energy, and information among social, physical, and biological systems. As terrestrial<br />

landscapes become increasingly fragmented, so do hydrologic connections between<br />

landscape elements (Pringle, 2001).<br />

The extensive deforestation at the Basin took place over a historic period. The colonization<br />

process of the area, specially of dense ombrophilous forest, was initially with sugar cane,<br />

coffee and orange plantations, followed by cattle raising and annual crops (CIBG, 2010),<br />

which favored the formation of erosive processes as well as silting of water bodies. The only<br />

area with significant forest remnants is found in high slopes, inappropriate for agriculture,


254<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

especially within the limits of Três Picos State Park. According to Freitas et al (2010), roads<br />

and topography can determine patterns of land use and distribution of forest cover,<br />

particularly in tropical regions.<br />

Many factors have affected negatively and contribute to degradation of Baia de Guanabara<br />

Basin such as the growth of unplanned cities, mining areas, exotic monocultures planted<br />

without planning, industries, oil refinery, among others. According to Bidone & Lacerda<br />

(2003), there are 12 municipal districts, 7.8 million inhabitants and around 12,500 industries<br />

distributed unevenly over the drainage basin area (4,000 km2).<br />

With the increasing deforestation, there were created several protected areas to conserve<br />

natural resources and biodiversity existing within it. The National System of Conservation<br />

Units (SNUC) was created in Brazil by the Federal Law No. 9985/2000, establishing criteria<br />

and standards for the creation, deployment and management of protected areas. The<br />

Brazil’s conservation units such as parks, reserves and APAs (<strong>Environment</strong>al Protected<br />

Areas) are grouped into two categories: “sustainable use” and “integral protection.”<br />

Integral protection conservation units are protected areas which main purpose is the<br />

conservation of biodiversity. Only the indirect use of natural resources is permitted and<br />

natural processes shall take place without human interference. The following conservation<br />

units according to International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) - management<br />

category I - III) fulfill this purpose: biological and ecological reserves/stations (I), national<br />

and state parks (II), natural monuments and wildlife refuges (III).<br />

Sustainable use conservation units were created with the idea of combining the conservation<br />

of biodiversity compatible with the rational use of the natural resources, while respecting the<br />

legislation that applies to such resources. The following conservation units (IUCN -<br />

management category IV- VI) fulfill this purpose: areas of relevant ecological interest (IV),<br />

environmental protection areas (V), extractive/fauna/sustainable development reserves (VI).<br />

Bidone et al. 1999 as cited in Bidone & Lacerda (2004), in accordance with land use criteria,<br />

classified the watersheds of the Guanabara Bay region into three types: (1) the pristine type,<br />

without anthropogenic activities, which generally belongs to legal environmental protection<br />

areas, with Mata Atlântica (i.e., a mountainous tropical rainforest type) and/or similar<br />

abundant vegetation on the slopes and natural coastal vegetation in the lowlands (grasses,<br />

savannas, ‘‘restingas’’); (2) the weakly impacted type with well-preserved Mata Atlântica<br />

and/or other remnant vegetation on the slopes, and lowland sectors with human activities<br />

(small-scale farming, tourist-urban activities); and (3) the highly impacted watersheds,<br />

densely populated and/or industrialized.<br />

Geographic Information System is a tool for evaluating and monitoring of environmental<br />

impacts (IBAMA, 2002) and has been widely used in watershed management, environmental<br />

zoning, support for studies of biogeography, monitoring animals, management of protected<br />

areas, evaluate deforestation, among others. GIS applications are tools that allow spatial<br />

analysis of landscape patterns and the consequences of human activities on these patterns<br />

(Tuominem et al. 2009). Though imagery resources can provide a reliable basis for measuring<br />

the amount and spatial configuration of forest clearing and exploitation.<br />

2. Objectives<br />

This chapter aims to provide information on land-cover in the Guanabara Bay Basin for<br />

monitoring its changing through time; to integrate remote sensing data aiming to provide a


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

diagnose of the distribution of vegetation remnants at Baia de Guanabara Basin among three<br />

periods ; to calculate the remaining areas of Atlantic Forest at the basin and correlate them<br />

with the altitude and slope; to use map algebra to combine raster maps of vegetation class<br />

and some other maps as the different conservation units at the basin to predict the remnant<br />

vegetation amount; to provide useful information for decision-making purposes.<br />

3. Study area<br />

The Guanabara Bay Basin is located in southeastern Brazil in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and<br />

its geographical coordinates are Latitude -22°20’S and - 22°59’S and Longitude - 42°32’W<br />

and - 43°34’W (Figure 1). This Basin is located in the tropical zone, with a typical hot and<br />

dry climate (Amador 1997). The annual average temperature reaches 24°C in the coastal<br />

plain and 20°C in the mountainous regions. The precipitation annual averaged 2,000mm in<br />

the Serra do Mar and oscillated between 1,000 and 1,500mm in the Baixada Fluminense<br />

(Amador op cit).<br />

Fig. 1. Study Area<br />

It covers an area of 4,198 km² and includes 16 municipalities that constitute part of the<br />

Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro (IBG, 2010). Part of the Basin is located in the<br />

mountain range “Serra do Mar”, mainly mountainous region and of rough relief, with steep<br />

slopes and small valleys. The western part of the Guanabara Bay is called “Baixada<br />

Fluminense”, located in plain relief that belongs to the urban region of Rio de Janeiro. The<br />

Baixada encompasses especially the municipalities of Duque de Caxias, Nova Iguaçu, São<br />

João de Meriti, Nilópolis, Belford Roxo, Queimados and Mesquita.<br />

255


256<br />

4. Methodology<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

4.1 Data acquired<br />

4.1.1 Landsat images<br />

Image mosaics from Landsat 5 (Thematic Mapper) and Landsat 7 ETM+ (Enhanced<br />

Thematic Mapper plus) were obtained at INPE (Brazilian Institute of Spatial Research) and<br />

at USGS (United States Geological Survey’s Earth Resources Observation and Science -<br />

EROS) websites.<br />

The two images of three periods (1985, 2001 and 2010) were mosaiced to cover the area of<br />

Baia de Guanabara Basin, as below:<br />

1985- Landsat 7 ETM+ scenes 217/75 and 217/76 from July 04 and August 05, respectively,<br />

obtained at websites of INPE and USGS;<br />

2001- Landsat 7 ETM+ scenes 217/75 from September 04 and 217/76 from October 28,<br />

obtained at USGS website;<br />

2010-Landsat 5 TM scenes 217/75 from May 06 and 217/76 from February 15, obtained at<br />

INPE website.<br />

4.1.2 SRTM<br />

Images of the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission V. 4.1 (SRTM) in 1-degree digital elevation<br />

model (DEM) were obtained at the site of CGIAR- Consortium for Spatial Information<br />

(Jarvis et al., 2008), for the elaborations of maps of altitude and slope classes.<br />

4.1.3 Shapefile data<br />

Vector format at a scale of 1:50,000 relating to municipalities, hydrography and the<br />

conservation units, were obtained from government agencies like the Brazilian Institute of<br />

Geography and Statistics (IBGE); National <strong>Environment</strong> Institute (INEA), Guanabara Bay<br />

Remediation Program (PDBG), Mata Atlântica Biosphere Reserve (RBMA), Brazilian Institute<br />

of <strong>Environment</strong> and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) and from municipalities.<br />

4.2 Images processing and classification<br />

This step is based on the application of techniques from digital image processing and visual<br />

interpretation of images to the acquisition of cartographic features. An image registration<br />

requires control points, a point whose coordinates reference is known. The three spectral<br />

bands of ETM+ and TM sensor with 30 meters spatial resolution (bands 3, 4 and 5) were<br />

registered through planimetrically correct maps. It was used the Universal Transverse<br />

Mercator (UTM) projection with longitude origin at 45 o00'00"W and datum SAD69. All<br />

image pre-processing procedures were done in SPRING 5.1.7 (Georeferenced Information<br />

Processing System), a state-of-the-art GIS developed by Brazil's National Institute for Space<br />

Research (Camara, 1996) and available for free on the web. It was also made a datum<br />

transformation for integrating the different data.<br />

The intent of the classification process is to categorize all pixels in a digital image into one of<br />

several land cover classes, or "themes". The software SPRING 5.1.7 was used to develop a<br />

statistical characterization of the reflectance for each information class for producing<br />

thematic maps of the land cover present in an image. It was made supervised classification<br />

(Atkinson, 2004; Foody, 2002; Richards, 1993), using Maximum Likelihood algorithm to<br />

extract the information and allow the mapping of land use and vegetation remaining<br />

(Waleed and Grealish, 2004). The area was classified into five major thematic categories as


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

following: 1)vegetation - tropical rainforest (ombrophilous forest), forested wetlands include<br />

mangrove swamps and pioneer formations and reforestation; 2- fields – including<br />

deforested areas, fields of altitude called “campos rupestres”; agriculture and pasture; 3)<br />

anthropogenic (Urban or Built-up Land)- including urban and industrial areas and 4)<br />

exposed areas (Transitional Areas) including nonforest, temporarily bare areas as<br />

construction is planned for such future uses as residences, shopping centers, industrial<br />

complexes. and 5)water –representing Guanabara Bay.<br />

4.3 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the shuttle radar topography mission<br />

It was used the digital elevation model (DEM) from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission<br />

V. 4.1 (SRTM) to create raster maps of altimetry and slope. The altimetry data were sliced<br />

into five class intervals: 0-8m 8-50m, 50-500m, 500-1500m and >1500m for generation a raster<br />

map. The slope classes was defined into six intervals as followed: 0-3% (plain terrain), 3-8%<br />

(gently sloping), 8-20% (sloping), 20-45% (moderately steep to steep), 45-75% (very steep -<br />

mountain slope) and >75% (scarped).<br />

The vegetation classes were defined according to the altitude in: mangrove ( 0-7m), lowland<br />

(0-40m), lower montane forest (40-500m), montane forest ( 500-1500) and upper montane<br />

forest (1500-2200).<br />

4.4 Map algebra application<br />

Map algebra uses math expressions to combine raster layers using operators such as<br />

arithmetic, relational and boolean logic (Wang & Pulard, 2005). It was used the algebraic<br />

language as a tool to estimate the deforestation in the Guanabara Bay Basin using SPRING<br />

5.1.7 software through Spatial Language for Algebraic Geoprocessing (LEGAL). Map algebra<br />

creates new features and attribute relations by overlaying the features from two or more input<br />

map layers. Features from each input layer are combined to create new output features. The<br />

thematic maps of classified images and some other maps of altimetry, slope and conservation<br />

units had been manipulated using Boolean algebraic expressions describing the rules and<br />

conditions involved in the evaluation and evolution of the deforestation process. Some<br />

Conservation Units were cut at the limit of the Guanabara Basin, since the target of this work is<br />

to verify the remnant vegetation belonging to the Basin. The integral and sustainable<br />

conservation units were overlayed with the maps of land cover classification to create a new<br />

map of the remnants vegetation areas in the three study periods (1985, 2001, 2010).<br />

4.5 Maps elaboration<br />

Finally, thematic maps of land cover classification, vegetation remnants according to<br />

altimetry and slope classes, vegetation remnants in the conservation units and vegetation<br />

fragments were prepared using the softwares Spring (INPE) and ArcGis (ESRI)<br />

5. Results<br />

5.1 Supervised classification of the three Images (1985-2001-2010)<br />

The supervised Classification (Figures 2-4 and Table 1) shows a decrease of vegetated extent<br />

in 24.99 percent between 1985 and 2001. The removal of vegetation cover and riparian forest<br />

is directly linked to increase in pasture lands and agricultural lands over the three periods,<br />

as showed in land cover classification.<br />

257


258<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

In the first time period (1985-2001) the vegetation clearance occurred in 321.989 square<br />

kilometers with an increase of agriculture and pasture lands. According to the image<br />

classification of 2010 period (Table 1) areas under or pasture use represent the major landcover<br />

type in Guanabara Basin, with 44.91 percent of land-cover classified. Although in the<br />

same period, some areas previously occupied by fields became urban and peri-urban areas.<br />

The increase of anthropogenic class was probably due to unsustainable land management<br />

and city expansion especially in informal settlements (“favelas”) with an increase of<br />

1,035.973 square kilometers of total occupation. As geographers and urban sociologists have<br />

long observed, topography is a key-element contributing to the heterogeneity of residential<br />

segregation (Medeiros, 2009). Rio de Janeiro offers a particularly interesting case, with<br />

favelas populating the hills and mountains right next to the high income areas (Medeiros,<br />

op.cit). According to Freitas et al (2010) roads and topography are not the current drivers of<br />

deforestation, but they act as attractors of land-use change and deforestation. In Guanabara<br />

Bay basin the observed linearity is due to the high rates of population growth and to<br />

unplanned occupation of watersheds, without the proper infrastructure to cope with their<br />

effluents (Bidone & Lacerda, 2004). According to Moraes (2009), escalating drought,<br />

deforestation, capitation, irresponsible land use, and pollution are direct consequences that<br />

demand an integrated management scheme.<br />

Fig. 2. Land Cover Classification map from 1985 period<br />

Figure 4 of the 2010 period also shows a large exposed area over 10 square kilometers in<br />

Guapi-Macacu Basin in the municipality of Itaboraí. The area was exposed due to<br />

excavation and earthmoving activities for the implementation of Petrobras Industrial<br />

Complex. According to the <strong>Environment</strong>al Impact Report (EIA), the basic petrochemical


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

unit of COMPERJ will process 150,000 bbl/day of domestic heavy oil to produce<br />

thermoplastic resins and fuels (Hernández, 2010). The establishment of petrochemical<br />

complex with the magnitude of COMPERJ can lead to an untenable situation due to the<br />

increase of the population rate in the Municipality of Itaboraí, which can cause serious<br />

damage to riparian vegetation and wetlands remaining in the eastern bay. Attention should<br />

be directed to potential social costs and impacts of large-scale projects in the Basin.<br />

According to Members of the Committee of the Guanabara Bay Basin (Hernández, 2010)<br />

water availability in Metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, considering the water imported from<br />

surrounded sub-basins, is no longer sufficient to meet the additional demand generated by<br />

the installation of the Petrochemical complex (Pedreira et al, 2009 as cited in Hernández,<br />

2010). Given the tendency toward continued population and Industrial growth, water<br />

availability will decline over time, though water availability per se tends to remain fairly<br />

constant (in terms of flow, but not in terms of quality) (Hespanhol, 2008).<br />

Fig. 3. Land Cover Classification map from 2001 period<br />

According to Hernández op cit. adequate water quality management is necessary for water<br />

resource management in a river basin, specifically having a sound water quality monitoring<br />

system to indicate the status of water body. Two other large-scale infrastructure projects are<br />

undergoing in the Basin: The Metropolitan Arch which will connect Itaguaí municipality to<br />

three other major highways: the BR-040 to Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais) and Brasília<br />

(Federal District), the BR-116 to Bahia, and the BR-101 to Espírito Santo and the Gasduct<br />

Camboinhas Reduc III with 179 kilometers of extension. The Gasduct was been made in an<br />

area of <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection in Cachoeiras de Macacu Municipality. According to<br />

Hespanhol, op cit water conservation in the form of demand management should also be<br />

encouraged in industry, pressing for the adoption of modern industrial processes and<br />

259


260<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

washing systems with lower water requirements, as well as water treatment stations for<br />

public supply through the adequate recuperation and reuse of water used to wash filters<br />

and decanters. The Niteroi Municipality Act (Law N o. 2.856/2011) establishes mechanisms<br />

to encourage the installation of collection system and wastewater reuse in public and private<br />

buildings. Under the Act, new public or private buildings, with an area over 500m 2 and<br />

water consumption greater than or equal to 20m 3 per day are obliged to encourage and<br />

promote gray water reuse.<br />

Fig. 4. Land Cover Classification map from 2010 period<br />

Land Cover Classses 1985 2001 2010 Variation (%)<br />

1985-2010<br />

Vegetation 1,590.738 1,268.749 1,193.087 -24.99<br />

Fields 1,791.635 1,985.152 1,833.160 +2.32<br />

Anthropogenic 661.874 829.596 1,035.973 +56.52<br />

Exposed 48.72 1.44 19.16 -60.67<br />

Table 1. Land Cover areas (km 2) in the three study periods.<br />

5.2 Conservation units in the Guanabara Basin<br />

The Figure 5, Table 2, shows the delimitation of the major conservation units in the<br />

Guanabara Bay Basin according to their uses as strict protection or sustainable use. The<br />

units are managed by Brazilian Institute of <strong>Environment</strong> and Renewable Natural<br />

Resources (IBAMA), Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio),


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

National <strong>Environment</strong> Institute (INEA) and municipalities, among which seventeen<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Protected Areas (APAS), five Parks, a Biological Reserve, two Ecological<br />

Stations, and an Ecological Reserve. The Atlantic Rainforest Central Mosaic which<br />

includes 22 conservation units and the Sambê Santa Fé Corridor which encompasses the<br />

mountains regions of Sambê, Santa Fé and Barbosão with well preserved forest stretches.<br />

Fig. 5. Main Conservation Units in the Guanabara Bay Basin<br />

The National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) was created in Brazil by the Federal<br />

Law No. 9985/2000, which includes the main categories of Protected Areas as follows:<br />

Area of <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection (APA): it is a rather large area characterized by a<br />

considerable population density and with abiotic, biotic, aesthetic, or cultural features<br />

of great importance, above all for the quality of life and human wellness. Protecting<br />

biological diversity, regulating the settlement processes, and ensuring the sustainable<br />

use of natural resources are among its main aims.<br />

Biological Reserve: it aims at strictly safeguarding the natural aspects within its borders,<br />

avoiding direct human interference or environmental changes, through measures to<br />

recover altered ecosystems and management actions necessary to recover or maintain<br />

the natural balance, biological diversity, and natural ecological processes.<br />

Ecological Station: it aims at safeguarding nature and carrying out scientific research<br />

activities.<br />

National Park: it aims at preserving natural ecosystems of great beauty and ecological<br />

importance, giving the opportunity to carry out scientific research activities or<br />

developing environmental education and interpretation activities, as well as promoting<br />

recreational activities at direct contact with nature and ecological tourism.<br />

261


262<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Area of Considerable Ecological Interest (ARIE): not very large area, with a scarce<br />

population density and extraordinary natural features of great importance at a regional<br />

and local level.<br />

Management<br />

Responsability<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTED AREAS (APAS)<br />

Federal 1. Petrópolis; 2.Guapemirim<br />

State 3. Guapi-Macacú River Basin; 4. Gericinó- Mendanha<br />

Municipal 5. Estrela; 6. Suruí; 7. Guapi-Guapiaçu; 8. Tinguá; 9. Rio D´Ouro; 10.<br />

Tinguazinho; 11. São Bento; 12. Engenho Pequeno; 13. Pretos Forros;<br />

14. Retiro; 15. Pedra Branca; 16.São José; 17-Morro do Valqueire<br />

PARKS<br />

Federal 18. National Park of Serra dos Órgãos; 19. National Park of Tijuca<br />

Forest<br />

State 20. State Park of Três Picos; 21. State Park of Pedra Branca<br />

Municipal 22. Municipal Park of Barbosão<br />

BIOLOGICAL RESERVE<br />

Federal 23. Tinguá<br />

Federal<br />

ECOLOGICAL STATIONS<br />

24. Guanabara Ecological Station<br />

State 25. Paraíso Ecological Station<br />

ECOLOGICAL RESERVE<br />

Municipal 26. Darcy Ribeiro Reserve<br />

CORRIDOR<br />

State 27. Sambê Santa Fé<br />

ARIE<br />

Municipal 28. Guanabara Bay<br />

Table 2. Main Conservation Units in the Basin<br />

The Brazilian Forest Code (Law No. 4771/1965) defines the limits were set on the use of<br />

property, where existing vegetation must be respected and considered of common interest<br />

to all, except for the removal of vegetation for public service interests provided there are<br />

environmental licenses and compliance with established environmental compensation.<br />

According the Brazilian Forest Code and the Resolutions of CONAMA (National<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Council) numbers 302 and 303, Permanent Protection Areas (APPs): are<br />

protected areas, covered or not by native vegetation, for the purpose of preserving water<br />

resources, landscape, geological stability, biodiversity, the gene flow of wild fauna and flora,<br />

protecting the soil and ensuring the well being of the human population. The APPs include<br />

mangrove swamps, riparian vegetation, sand dune scrubs “restingas”, regions above 1,800<br />

meters of altitude and hillsides with slopes above 45 degrees. According to the Brazilian<br />

Code Legal Reserves (LRs) are areas located within a farm, with exception to permanent


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

preservation areas, necessary for sustainable uses of natural resources, conservation and<br />

rehabilitation of ecological processes, conservation of biodiversity, and the shelter and<br />

protection for native fauna and flora. Current Brazilian law provides that the Legal<br />

Preservation should be 80% in the Amazon, 35% in savanna regions in Amazonian states,<br />

and 20% in other regions in the country. The reforestation should be done with species<br />

native to the area.<br />

The new Forest Code in Brazil indicates some changes in regards to the Permanent<br />

Protection Areas (APP) and Legal Reserves (WWF, 2011). According to current legislation, at<br />

least 30 meters from banks and rivers, steep slopes, hilltops and wetlands should be<br />

protected. Thus, those who deforest need to restore vegetation. Under the new code, the<br />

minimum protection may be reduced to at least 15 meters, and meadows cease to be<br />

considered APP. In relation to Legal Reserves, properties of up to 4 taxed modules (varies<br />

among different municipalities) do not need to have a reservation, which will be mandatory<br />

only for properties that exceed four modules. The amendments to the Brazilian Forest Code<br />

may have an important negative effect on Brazil’s capacity to reduce emissions from<br />

deforestation and forest degradation. The proposed changes will effectively allow more land<br />

to be converted for agricultural purposes in Areas of Permanent Preservation, such as<br />

hillsides (inclusively forest land 45% in slope or over) and riversides. In addition, existing<br />

cultivation of some products including grapes, apples and coffee will continue to be allowed<br />

in areas designated as Permanent Protection Areas (APP). The bill provides an amnesty for<br />

some small landowners, and may encourage illicit practices. This new proposal will lead to<br />

serious consequences in decreasing of urban and peri-urban water supplies in the face of<br />

accelerating population and economic growth. In addition, deforestation and land clearing<br />

pose serious problems to the carbon cycling to McPherson (1998), urban forests can reduce<br />

atmospheric CO, in two ways. Trees directly sequester CO, as woody and foliar biomass<br />

while they grow. Also, trees around buildings can reduce the demand for heating and air<br />

conditioning, thereby reducing emissions associated with electric power production (Mc<br />

Pherson, op cit).<br />

5.3 Remnant vegetation in the conservation units of strict preservation uses and<br />

sustainable uses<br />

Figures 6 to 8 and Table 3 showed the remnant vegetation in Conservation Units of integral<br />

protection and of sustainable use in the Guanabara Bay Basin. The greatest loss of vegetated<br />

areas was observed in conservation units of sustainable use. In environmental protected<br />

areas "APAS", there was a loss of 20.23 percent in vegetation class between 1985 and 2010,<br />

the equivalent of 100.371 square kilometers. In the strict protection units as parks it was<br />

observed the vegetation loss of 11.27 percent which represents a decrease of 39.43 square<br />

kilometers in vegetated areas. The Tinguá Biological Reserve has been decreasing its<br />

vegetated in 5.23 percent along the study periods.<br />

As a Conservation Unit of Sustainable Use, the <strong>Environment</strong>al Protected Area of Guapi-<br />

Macacu River Basin, established in 2002, contributes to the supply of drinking water to nearly<br />

2.5 million inhabitants living in six municipalities in the State of Rio de Janeiro (Da costa 2007).<br />

This basin has suffered several interventions as the built of the Channel of Imunana with the<br />

purpose of draining the frequently flooded adjacent areas (Da Costa op cit).<br />

263


264<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 6. Remnants vegetation areas in conservation units of Guanabara Bay (1985).<br />

Fig. 7. Remnants vegetation areas in conservation units of Guanabara Bay (2001).


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

Fig. 8. Remnants vegetation areas in conservation units of Guanabara Bay (2010).<br />

It is evident in the Figures 7 and 8 that the higher forest cover rate is associated with the<br />

riparian vegetation along the rivers. Results show the disappearance of large part of riparian<br />

vegetation along the Guapi-Macacu river banks. According to CONAMA (National<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Council) Resolution No. 9 from 1996, riparian forests are considered<br />

corridors linking forest remnants, thus increasing landscape connectivity. In addition, forest<br />

fragmentation pattern of Guapi-Macacu river basin appeared to be associated with<br />

topography and slope. With the implementation of the Metropolitan Arch and the<br />

Petrochemical Complex it is expected a rapid anthropogenic increase moved by the process<br />

of building infrastructure networks in urban areas.<br />

The magnitude and extent of human impacts have altered biodiversity, hydrologic<br />

connectivity (Pringle,2001), conservation of aquatic ecosystems and also water supplies in the<br />

medium and long term. According to Pedreira et al., as cited in Hernández (2010), the main<br />

environmental pressures in water quality in the Guanabara Basin are: inappropriate land-use<br />

activities, specifically, removal of majority of the original vegetation cover, removal of riparian<br />

forest, unplanned urban sprawl, lack of sewage treatment and improper supervision of<br />

industrial activities; causing steep erosion and river siltation. Despite the promulgation of<br />

wide-reaching legislation, including Law 9,433/1997, which institute the National Water<br />

Resource Policy and defined the legal and administrative framework for the National Water<br />

Resource System and CONAMA Resolution 357/2005, which established the classification of<br />

water bodies and the conditions for effluents discharging, the water pollution is steadily<br />

increasing. In critical areas surrounding the Guanabara Bay (particularly along its NW coast),<br />

less than 60% of the population has access to adequate sewage treatment, only about 10% of<br />

the total sewage is treated before being released into the Bay, the rest being released untreated<br />

265


266<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

into the Bay’s tributaries (Bidone & Lacerda, op cit). According to Hespanhol (2008) in terms of<br />

water resource management, it is therefore fundamental, especially in urban areas, that we<br />

abandon the outmoded orthodox principles and implement a new paradigm based on the keywords<br />

of water conservation and reuse, as only thus will it be possible to minimize the costs<br />

and environmental impacts associated with the new channeling projects.<br />

In the mountain regions, the most affected areas in terms of vegetated loss in the Guapi-<br />

Macacu Basin were observed in National Park of Serra dos Órgãos and also State Park of<br />

Três Picos. About eleven percent of the park´s vegetation has been lost between 1985 and<br />

2010, which represents an area of thirty three square kilometers. According to Goncalves et<br />

al. (2009) to reconcile conservation and land-use one of the alternatives is to establish buffer<br />

zones around protected areas, within which human activities are subjected to specific rules<br />

and restrictions. Brazil’s Conservation Units National System (SNUC) determines that<br />

protected areas should be surrounded by buffer zones where human activity is restrict, but<br />

the established size of the buffer seems arbitrary (Alexandre et al, 2010). In 1990, the<br />

National <strong>Environment</strong> Council (CONAMA) Resolution number 13 had already defined a<br />

buffer zone of 10 kilometers around protected areas, where any activity that may affect the<br />

biota should be licensed (CONAMA, 1990). In 2010 the resolution No. 13 was revoked by<br />

Resolution No. 428/2010, which reduced the buffer zone to 3 kilometers for licensing the<br />

enterprises of a significant environmental impact , located from the edge of Conservation<br />

Units, where the buffer zone is not established with the exception of private reserves<br />

(RPPN), the <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection Areas (APAs) and consolidated urban areas.<br />

Vegetation Remnant Areas (Square Kilometers) Variation (%)<br />

Conservation Units 1985 2001 2010 1985-2010<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Protection Areas<br />

496.193 427. 573 395.822 -20.23<br />

Parks 349.687 338.979 310.257 -11.27<br />

Ecological Reserve 4.141 3.685 4.120 -0.48<br />

Biological Reserve 151.083 149.767 143.172 -5.23<br />

Ecological Station 63.550 61.297 59.185 -6.87<br />

Sambê Santa Fé<br />

Corridor<br />

255.330 206.108 198.720 -22.17<br />

Table 3. Vegetation Remnant Areas (km 2) in the Conservation Units at Baia de Guanabara<br />

Basin<br />

5.4 Remnant vegetation according to altitude<br />

Guanabara Bay Basin is characterized by a large number of small ponds (over 40), usually<br />


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

According to Freitas et al (2010) the highest deforestation and fragmentation occurred in less<br />

declivous areas, where there are more roads, and more intensive land use. The results<br />

corroborate those previously reported by Freitas op cit, with a significant decrease in 62.01<br />

percent of vegetated areas in the lowlands, the equivalent of an area of 110.689 square<br />

kilometers.<br />

Fig. 9. Remnant vegetation according to altimetry (1985)<br />

The mangrove area has decreased from 86.308 km2 in 1985 to 67.397 km2 in 2010. The main<br />

causes of mangrove degradation in the Guanabara Bay Basin include population pressure,<br />

agriculture, as well as pollution. On a positive note, between 2001 and 2010 there was a<br />

small increase in mangrove area, probably due planting and replanting initiatives. However,<br />

the Landsat images do not allow more detailed assessments in relation to degradation stage<br />

of mangroves that continually receive different kinds of waste coming from urban,<br />

commercial and industrial activities.<br />

The major extension of vegetation remnants was observed in higher altitudes (“serras”).<br />

Areas with steep slopes are less used and is much more likely to remain forested (Silva,<br />

2007). Although montane forests and upper montane forests have been losing areas along<br />

the study periods, mainly due to intentional fires or those for clearing land for pastures. In<br />

September 2010, intentional fires in the State Park of Três Picos destroyed 80 hectares of<br />

pasture lands, natural forests and fields of altitude called “campos rupestres”. In August<br />

2011 a fire broke out 30 hectares of forest in the National Park of Serra dos Órgãos. The<br />

major cause of the vegetation loss in the Guanabara Basin was due to urban development<br />

without planning.<br />

267


268<br />

Fig. 10. Remnant vegetation according to altimetry (2001)<br />

Fig. 11. Remnant vegetation according to altimetry (2010)<br />

Deforestation Around the World


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

Area (Km 2) 1985 2001 2001 Variation (%)<br />

1985-2010<br />

Mangrove swamps and wetlands<br />

(0-7m)<br />

86.308 67.397 67.792 -21.31<br />

Lowland (0-40m) 178.497 90.401 67.808 -62.01<br />

Lower montane forest (40-500m) 884.356 691.698 672.229 -23.98<br />

Montane forest (500-1500m) 405.536 396.678 364.694 -10.07<br />

Upper montane forest (1500-<br />

2200m)<br />

Table 4. Remnant Vegetation in relation to altimetry<br />

17.90 15.05 10.1 -43.52<br />

5.5 Vegetation fragmentation in the Atlantic Rainforest Central Mosaic<br />

Landscape mosaics are described by the landscape components of patches, corridors, and<br />

the surrounding matrix ( Forman, 1995). Factors such as patch size and shape, corridor<br />

characteristics, and connectivity work together to determine the pattern and process of the<br />

landscape (Forman, op cit). Franklin et al. (2002) has proposed four requisites for building<br />

situational definitions of habitat fragmentation: (1) what is being fragmented, (2) what is the<br />

scale(s) of fragmentation, (3) what is the extent and pattern of fragmentation, and (4) what is<br />

the mechanism(s) causing fragmentation. According to Franklin op cit., fragmentation at the<br />

range-wide scale can affect dispersal between populations, fragmentation at the population<br />

scale can alter local population dynamics, and fragmentation at the home range scale can<br />

affect individual performance measures, such as survival and reproduction. The topography<br />

can also influence patterns of forest fragmentation and forest cover, as previously<br />

demonstrated in several regions, including the Brazilian Atlantic Forest region (Silva et al.,<br />

2007; Freitas et al., 2010). Fahrig (2003) defined four effects which influence the<br />

fragmentation process on habitat pattern:(a) reduction in habitat amount; (b) increase in<br />

number of patches; (c) reduction in patch size; and (d) increase of isolation between patches.<br />

However, fragmentation measures vary widely; some include only effect (e.g., reduced<br />

habitat amount or reduced patch sizes) whereas others include two or three effects but not<br />

all four (Fahrig, op.cit). The large connected area (corridor) allows the exchange of genetic<br />

material with large populations.<br />

The study area is included in the Atlantic Rainforest Central Mosaic with a large and<br />

contiguous corridor observed in mountain region. The figures 12 to 14 show that the six<br />

classes of vegetation fragments, varied from very small fragments (


270<br />

Fig. 12. Vegetation Fragmentation in Guanabara Bay Basin (1985)<br />

Fig. 13. Vegetation Fragmentation in Guanabara Bay Basin (2001)<br />

Deforestation Around the World


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

Fig. 14. Vegetation Fragmentation in Guanabara Bay Basin (2010)<br />

In the same period, there was also a lack of continuity between forest fragments that were<br />

previously connected. Fragment size and connectivity are among the key landscape factors<br />

that affect species survival in fragmented landscapes (Carvalho et al., 2009). Metzger et al.<br />

(2009) suggested that fragment size is usually related to the amount and diversity of<br />

resources, which directly influence the size and number of resident populations.<br />

The study shows that the largest reduction in size of forest patches was observed on the<br />

plains. Although the vegetation patch in lowlands is extremely important to allow<br />

connection between highlands, it was observed that vegetation fragments become smaller<br />

and more widely spaced. Figure 12 shows a vegetation patch of 4,648 hectares in the central<br />

part of the Guapi-Macacu River Basin , which was reduced to some small patches<br />

disconnected in 2010. Also, the number of the bigger fragments declined while the smaller<br />

ones increased, which means that during that study period a strong fragmentation took<br />

place. According to Freitas et al. (2010) higher density of roads is a primary predictor of<br />

forest fragmentation and deforestation. As shown in Figure 14, there was a fragmentation in<br />

the south and southwest of the Sambê Santa Fé Corridor in some small patches of<br />

vegetation. According to the analysis in 1985 the Corridor of Sambe Santa Fé had a largecontinuous<br />

patch of 188.200 square kilometers. In 2001 this large patch was reduced to<br />

142.117 square kilometers and several fragments of different sizes, which will bring serious<br />

problems for the local biodiversity. The National Park of Serra dos Órgãos has lost<br />

approximately 20 percent of the vegetated area.<br />

5.6 Anthropogenic occupation in Guanabara Bay Basin in relation to slope classes<br />

The topography determines the expansion of roads and the land use activities, which will<br />

impact the forest cover (Freitas et al, 2010). The thematic maps overlay of anthropogenic<br />

271


272<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

class and slope layers (Figure 15) showed that the human occupation occurs mainly in the<br />

slope classes between 0 and 3 percent, less than 10 meters of altimetry. The anthropogenic<br />

class occupied an area over 600 square kilometers in plan terrain, which is subject to risk of<br />

flooding, especially in rainy periods. In April 2010, heavy rain caused destruction and death<br />

in the State of Rio de Janeiro. The anthropogenic growth is also evident in slopes between 3<br />

to 8 percent, with 268 square kilometers occupancy in gentle sloping terrain. In steep slopes<br />

and near streams, where it is difficult to grow crops and accessibility is limited, forest is<br />

commonly found (Teixeira et al., 2009). In addition, in most cases the Atlantic Forest region<br />

is located in sites where access is difficult (Cabral et al., 2007; Silva et al.,2007). According to<br />

Freitas op cit, forests far from land use (buildings and agriculture) and major cities are more<br />

likely to be preserved and regenerated. The results corroborate those from authors cited<br />

above with low occurence of anthropogenic occupation on slopes between 20 to 45 percent<br />

and 45 to 75 percent with higher amount of remnant vegetation. This fact is explained by the<br />

difficulty of occupying the higher slopes and the lack of infraestructure which restrict the<br />

urban expansion.<br />

Fig. 15. Anthropogenic Occupation in relation to slope classes.<br />

Figure 16 shows that the anthropogenic occupation in plan terrain also occurs in buffer<br />

zones that must be preserved as the Permanent Protection Areas (APP), along the rivers, in<br />

the buffer zones of riparian vegetation. According to Naiman & Décamps (1997) riparian<br />

zones play essential roles in water and landscape planning, in restoration of aquatic<br />

systems, and in catalyzing institutional and societal cooperation for these efforts. Rivers and<br />

their adjoining riparian zones are considered to be the most important corridors for<br />

movements of animals in natural landscapes (Forman & Godron 1986). Furthermore, human


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

alteration of riverine ecosystems involves not only changes to flow regimes but also<br />

simultaneous changes in hydrologic connectivity (Nilsson et al. 2005).<br />

The human occupation is also observed in mountain regions, inside buffer zones of strict<br />

protection conservation units as Parks and Reserves. The Figure 16 also shows a drastic<br />

reduction of seven kilometers in buffer zones, which may allow the expansion and<br />

implementation of large-scale infrastructure projects and also a rapid urban occupation in<br />

the eastern part of Guanabara Bay Basin. There is a concern with the rapid urban growth in<br />

Itaboraí, Cachoeiras de Macacu and Guapemirim which could bring serious damage to<br />

surrounding pristine vegetation, riparian vegetation and also wetlands.<br />

Fig. 16. Anthropogenic occupation in buffer zones<br />

5.7 Critical areas for protection<br />

The Conservation Units in the Atlantic Rainforest Central Mosaic are becoming fragmented<br />

and have lost a great amount of vegetated areas along the study period. It was identified<br />

two critical areas that Conservation or restoration actions become more urgent: Sambê Santa<br />

Fé Corridor and Guapi-Macacu River Basin. The major rupture in the continuity of Sambê<br />

Santa Fé Corridor is observed in southwestern part of the corridor (Figure 17a,b,c) with<br />

highly fragmented landscapes into small and isolated fragments. In 1985 it was observed the<br />

close proximity of the patches and also the amount of vegetation areas was higher than in<br />

2010. Figure 17c shows that the patches were reduced in habitat amount, increase in<br />

isolation among patches and reduction in patches size.<br />

273


274<br />

Fig. 17. Sambê Santa Fé Corridor<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

Deforestation Around the World


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

(c)<br />

Fig. 18. Guapi-Macacu River Basin (1985, 2001 and 2010), respectively.<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

275


276<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The vegetation patches in Guapi-Macacu River Basin are being fragmented along the years.<br />

Figures 18a,b,c shows a decrease in amount of vegetated area among the study periods. In<br />

2010 it was observed that the vegetation fragments became smaller and isolated and the<br />

riparian vegetation is much less evident. Fig 18c shows that riparian vegetation had a severe<br />

decreasing in the central part of Guapi-Macacu. Human-centered attitudes toward water<br />

have deteriorated many riverine ecosystems, implying that the derived benefits have<br />

brought considerable environmental and social costs (Nilsson, 2007). Therefore,<br />

enhancements of river connectivity require thorough analysis and, ideally, should be carried<br />

out in concert with rehabilitation of flow dynamics (Nilsson op cit.).<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

Forests are cleared, degraded and fragmented in the Guanabara Basin. The riparian<br />

vegetation in the Guapi-Macacu river basin is disappearing over the years and it may soon<br />

affect the water supply in the Guanabara Basin. The most serious threat comes from the<br />

disorderly and irregular land occupation without urban planning.<br />

People yet ignore the importance of the riparian vegetation and this negligence will cause in<br />

a near future serious problems in the available ground water and consequently in the water<br />

supply. Degraded riparian vegetation leaves surrounding ecosystems vulnerable to some<br />

disturbances as flood and drought. The existing vegetation in the riparian zone needs to be<br />

kept intact or protected by law. There must be strongly enforced laws to limit urban<br />

occupation in the river bank and avoid activities which deplete the riparian vegetation.<br />

Despite its water reserves, Brazil now runs the risk of losing their most precious natural<br />

resources: water and forests, due to disorderly process of land occupation and irresponsible<br />

degradation of the environment. Everything that happens in one point of a river basin will<br />

influence the total of the basin. The irresponsible use of natural resources is bringing<br />

drought, which is bound to handicap the production of vital resources for sustaining human<br />

population, as is already happening in some parts of the world (Moraes, 2009).<br />

There is a need for the stakeholders to establish conservation initiatives and share<br />

experiences in order to safeguard the riparian vegetation, mangrove swamps and Atlantic<br />

Forest remnants of the Guanabara Bay Basin. The forests are essentials for maintaining a<br />

drinking-water provision.<br />

It is necessary urgent efforts to restore the remaining forests, with reforestation initiatives,<br />

especially in the headwaters of rivers. And to connect and expand the remnants of forests<br />

that are already fragmented which reduces the capacity of species to disperse through the<br />

landscape.<br />

The Landsat satellite becomes very useful for working with medium scale maps for<br />

distinguishing higher ranks of classification. Moderate resolution remote sensing is widely<br />

used in a variety of sectors including land use planning, agriculture, and forestry. However,<br />

this approach cannot be applied directly in large scale maps. Thus, it is necessary an<br />

integrated study combining high resolution satellite images with data from other sources<br />

(thematic maps and numerical data) for providing new possibilities for land-cover analysis<br />

of the Basin. The further studies using a large-scale vegetation mapping for verifying with<br />

detailed the different succession stages of Atlantic Forest and its biodiversity. According to<br />

National <strong>Environment</strong>al Council (CONAMA) number 6, 1994 and Law n. 11.428 (December,


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

2006) different types of land use and natural vegetation cover are categorized based on<br />

ecological succession.<br />

Water production for life also depends on protected areas. A connected administration<br />

(Federal, State and Municipal) of different protected areas is essential. Parks, reserves and<br />

environmental protected areas have to plan together and also work together against fires,<br />

environmental disasters, irregular occupations, trafficking and poaching of animals. Impacts<br />

in higher places affect lower places. So those the opposite. It is very important the<br />

interaction between public and private agencies and also non Governmental Organizations<br />

NGOs, universities, and research organizations aiming at define land use objectives and<br />

restrictions.<br />

The restoration of Guapi-Macacu River Basin is not easy and involves efforts by different<br />

sectors of society to the implementation of integrated alternatives such as: technical,<br />

ecological, and also environmental education programs and policies. It is also urgent a<br />

linking of remnant vegetation of lowlands with that of highlands aiming at guarantee the<br />

water supply in the basin and also the integrity of the ecosystem.<br />

Sambê Santa Fé Corridor restoration should be considered a high priority conservation<br />

action, since the corridor contributes to maintain the water quality and quantity of Guapi-<br />

Macacu watershed.<br />

In Brazil were created some Conservation Units and ecological corridors to preserve<br />

biodiversity and restore landscape connectivity. Many units have been established for over<br />

20 years and still do not have a management plan which difficult the environment zoning.<br />

Some NGO´s and public and private organs are currently involved with Atlantic Forest<br />

conservation efforts. Although, these efforts is not sufficient to preserve/conserve the<br />

Protection Areas and its remnant vegetation. This fact is mainly because the political and<br />

economic interests have a higher priority than environmental ones.<br />

Urban planning is essential, especially in the areas of influence of Rio de Janeiro<br />

Petrochemical Complex (COMPERJ) that are expanding rapidly. The urban expansion in the<br />

eastern part of the basin may cause serious damages to remnant vegetation , especially with<br />

the reduction of buffer zones, including strict protection in areas as parks and ecological<br />

stations. The application of public and private investments in water reuse is also urgent to<br />

meet additional population demand.<br />

With the increasing of world population it is necessary a change in way of life in order to<br />

seek what is really important for our survival by using different sources of sustainable<br />

energy as well as making use of non conventional materials. Humans can no longer<br />

continue exploiting and destroying the forests because in the end, we will be no water, no<br />

food and no prospect of survival in our planet.<br />

7. Acknowledgment<br />

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro<br />

(FAPERJ)- Auxílio APQ1, Brazillian Institute of Spatial Research (INPE); U.S. Geological<br />

Survey (USGS); Consortium for Spatial Information- CGIAR; Instituto Brasileiro do Meio<br />

Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis – IBAMA; Instituto Estadual do Ambiente<br />

(INEA); Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica (RBMA); Programa de Despoluição da Baía<br />

de Guanabara (PDBG); Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE).<br />

277


278<br />

8. References<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Alexandre B., Crouzeilles R. & Grelle, C. E. V. (2010). How Can We Estimate Buffer Zones of<br />

Protected Areas? A Proposal Using Biological Data. Natureza & Conservação 8,2,<br />

pp165-170<br />

Amador, E. S. (1997). Baía de Guanabara e Ecossistemas Periféricos: Homem e Natureza. Edição<br />

do Autor. Reprodução e Encadernação: Reproarte Gráfica e Editora Ltda. Rio de<br />

Janeiro. Brasil. 539 pp.<br />

Atkinson, P.M. (2004). Spatially weighted supervised classification for remote sensing.<br />

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5, (July 2004), 277-291<br />

Bidone, E.D. & Lacerda L.D. (2004). The use of DPSIR framework to evaluate sustainability<br />

in coastal areas. Case study: Guanabara Bay Basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Reg<br />

Environ Change 4, (March 2003),5–16<br />

Brasil. (1965). Lei Federal 4.771, 15 de setembro de 1965. July 12, 2009. Available from:<br />

<br />

Brasil. (1997). Lei Federal 9.433, 08 de janeiro de 1997. July 31, 2009. Available from: <<br />

http://www.jusbrasil.com.br/ legislacao/1027020/lei-9433-97><br />

Brasil. (2000). Lei n° 9.985 de 18 de julho de 2000. March 28, 2009. Available from:<br />

http://www.planalto.gov.br/ ccivil_03/leis/L9985.htm<br />

Brasil (2006). Lei n o. 11.428 de 22 de dezembro de 2006. August 12, 2011. Available from:<br />

http://www.planalto.gov.br/ ccivil_03/ _ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11428.htm<br />

Cabral, D. de C; Freitas, S.R. Fiszon, J.T. (2007). Combining sensors in landscape ecology:<br />

imagery-based landfarm-level analysis in the study of human-driven forest<br />

fragmentation. Sociedade & Natureza, 19, 2, pp69-87<br />

Camara, G., Souza R.C.M., Freitas U.M., Garrido J. (1996). SPRING: Integrating remote<br />

sensing and GIS by object-oriented data modelling. Computers & Graphics, 20, 3,<br />

(May-Jun, 1996), pp395-403<br />

Carreiras, J.M.B., Pereira, J.M.C., Shimabukuro, Y.E. (2006). Land-Cover Mapping in the<br />

Brazilian Amazon using SPOT-4 vegetation data and machine learning classification<br />

methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72,8, pp897-910<br />

Carvalho, F. M.V, Marco Júnior P. de,Ferreira, L. G. (2009). The Cerrado into-pieces: Habitat<br />

fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil.<br />

Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1392–1403<br />

CIBG–Centro de Informação da Baía de Guanabara. (2010). Panorama da Baía. Origem e<br />

Evolução. August 12, 2010. Available from: <br />

CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). (1975).<br />

November 09, 2010. Available from: http://www.cites.org/index.html<br />

CONAMA (Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente). (1990). Resolução nº13 de 6 de dezembro de<br />

1990. January 5, 2011. Available from<br />


Remnant Vegetation Analysis of Guanabara Bay Basin,<br />

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Geographical Information System<br />

<br />

CONAMA (Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente). (2005). Resolução nº 357 de 17 de março de<br />

2005. January 10, 2010. Available from:<br />

http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res05/res35705.pdf<br />

CONAMA(Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente). (2010). Resolução nº 428 de 17 de dezembro<br />

de 2010. August 06, 2011. Available from:<br />

http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=641<br />

Da Costa, J. R. (2008). Impactos Ambientais na bacia hidrográfica de Guapi-Macacu e suas<br />

conseguências para o abastecimento de água nos municípios do leste da Baía<br />

Guanabara. CETEM (Centro de Tecnología Mineral. Retrieved from:<br />

http://www.cetem.gov.br/publicacao/series_sgpa/sgpa-10_final.pdf<br />

Foody, G.M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> 80, (July 2001), 185-201. ESRI, 2008. ArcView 9.2. California, U.S.A.:<br />

Redlands.<br />

Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.<br />

(2003). 34, pp487–515<br />

Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology.<br />

Landscape Ecology 10, 3, pp133-142.<br />

Franklin, A.B.; Noon, B.R. & Luke, G. T. (2002). What is habitat fragmentation? Studies in<br />

Avian Biology, 25, pp:20-29.<br />

Freitas, S.R. Hawbaker, T. J. Metzger J. P. (2010). Combining sensors in landscape ecology:<br />

imagery-based and farm-level analysis in the study of human-driven forest<br />

fragmentation Roads and topography can determine patterns of land use and<br />

distribution of forest cover, particularly in tropical regions. Forest Ecology and<br />

Management 259, (2010), pp410–417<br />

FUNDAÇÃO SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA/INPE. (2009). Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da<br />

Mata Atlântica e ecossistemas associados no período de 2005-2008. Fundação SOS Mata<br />

Atlântica/INPE. January 10, 2011. Available from:<br />

< http:// mapas. sosma.org.br/site_media /download/atlas%20mata%20atlanticarelatorio2005-2008.pdf<br />

Grimm, N. B., Foster, D., Groffman, P., Morgan Grove, J., Hopkinson C. S., Nadelhoffer K. J.<br />

, Pataki D. E. & Peters D. P.C. (2008). The Changing Landscape:ecosystem<br />

responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients.<br />

Front Ecol Environ. 6, 5, pp264–272.<br />

Hespanhol, I. (2008). A new paradigm for urban water management and how industry is coping<br />

with it. In: Jimenez, B. & Asano, T. (Eds). Water reuse: an international survey of<br />

current practice, issues and needs. IWA Publishing, London. Scientifi c and Technical<br />

Report 20, pp. 467-482, Retrieved from:<br />

<br />

Hernández, J.H.A. (2010). Water Quality Monitoring System approach to support Guapi-<br />

Macacu River Basin Management, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Masters Thesis.<br />

(<strong>Environment</strong>al Science). Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí. México.2010,<br />

95f. Retrieved from:< http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br /bitstream/doc<br />

/875522/1/Thesis19092010coorientacao Rachel.pdf<br />

IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. (2002).<br />

Modelo de Valoração Econômica dos Impactos Ambientais em Unidades de Conservação.<br />

IBAMA, 66p. Retrieved from: http://www.ibama.gov.br/phocadownload/cnia/5valeconomicauc.pdf<br />

279


280<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

INPE/DPI (2011) SPRING user's manual . April 25, 2011. Available from:<br />

<br />

IBG – Instituto Baía de Guanabara. Unidades de conservação. January 2010. Available from:<<br />

http://www.portalbaiade guanabara.org.br/portal/baiadados.asp><br />

Jarvis, A.; Reuter, H.I; Nelson, A.; Guevara, E. (2008). Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4.<br />

March 09, 2011. Available from: <br />

Mc Pherson, G. (1998). Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Sacramento's Urban<br />

Forest. Journal of Arboriculture 24, 4, pp215-223<br />

Medeiros, B. F. (2009). The favela and its touristic transits. Geoforum 40, (2009), pp580–588<br />

Metzger, J. P., Martensen, A. C., Dixo, M. Bernacci, L.C., Ribeiro, M. C., Teixeira, A.M.G.,<br />

Pardini, R.(2009). Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly<br />

dynamic Atlantic Forest region. Biological Conservation, 142, (March 2009), pp1166-1177.<br />

Moraes, L.A. F de. (2009). A visão integrada da Ecohidrologia para o manejo sustentável dos<br />

ecossistemas aquáticos. Oecologia Brasiliensis .13, 4, pp676-687<br />

Naiman, R. J., and Décamps H. (1997). The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual<br />

Review of Ecology and Systematics. 28, pp621-658.<br />

Nilsson, C., C. A. Reidy, M. Dynesius, and C. Revenga.(2005). Fragmentation and flow<br />

regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science. 308, pp405-408.<br />

Nilsson, C., R. Jansson, B. Malmqvist, and R. J. Naiman (2007). Restoring riverine<br />

landscapes: the challenge of identifying priorities, reference states, and techniques.<br />

Ecology and Society 12, 1. 16. [online] URL:<br />

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art16/<br />

Niterói (2011). Lei Municipal 2.856, 27 de julho de 2011. September 10, 2011. Available from:<br />

<br />

Pringle, C.M. (2001). Hydrologic Connectivity and the Management of Reserves: a Global<br />

Perspective. Ecological Applications, 11,4, (March 2000), pp. 981–998<br />

Richards, J.A. (1993). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction (2rd revised and<br />

enlarged edition), Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-58219-3, New York<br />

Silva, W.G., Metzger, J.P., Simões, S.B Simonetti C. A. (2010). Relief influence on the spatial<br />

distribution of the Atlantic Forest cover on the Ibiúna Plateau, SP. Braz. J. Biol., 67,3,<br />

pp 403-411<br />

Teixeira, A.M.G., Soares-Filho, B.S., Freitas, S.R., Metzger, J.P. (2009). Modeling landscape<br />

dynamics in an Atlantic Rainforest region: implications for conservation. Forest<br />

Ecology and Management 257, (October, 2008), pp1219–1230<br />

USGS - Global Visualization Viewer. 04 June, 2010. Available from:<br />

<br />

Tuominem, J. , Lipping, T., Kuosmanen, V., Haapanen R. (2009). Remote Sensing of Forest<br />

Health. InTech, ISBN 978-953-307-003-2, Viena, Austria.<br />

Veloso, H. P., Rangel Filho A. L. R., Lima J. C. A. (1991). Classificação da vegetação brasileira<br />

adaptada a um sistema universal. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e<br />

Estatística (IBGE), ISBN 85-240-0384-7, Rio de Janeiro.<br />

Waleed, R.; Grealish. (2004). Mapping arable soils using GIS-based soil information database<br />

in Kwait. Management of <strong>Environment</strong> Quality 15,3, pp. 229-237.<br />

Wang , X.; Pullar D.(2005). Describing dynamic modeling for landscapes with vector map<br />

algebra in GIS . Computers & Geosciences, 31, 8, (February, 2005) pp956-967.<br />

WWF. (2011). Código Florestal:Entenda o que está em jogo com a reformada nossa legislação<br />

ambiental. August 30, 2011. Available from:<br />


Part 3<br />

Preventing Deforestation


14<br />

Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems:<br />

Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Robert H. Horwich1, Jonathan Lyon1,2, Arnab Bose1,3 and Clara B. Jones1 1Community Conservation,<br />

2Merrimack College,<br />

3Natures Foster<br />

1,2USA 3<strong>India</strong> 1. Introduction<br />

The natural world is in a chronic state of crisis and under constant threat of degradation,<br />

primarily by anthropogenic factors. In general, current conservation strategies have failed to<br />

effect long-range solutions to the rapid loss of biodiversity (Persha et al., 2011).<br />

Deforestation continues despite efforts by mainstream (top-down) conservation programs<br />

(Persha et al., 2011; Schmitt et al., 2009), and the effectiveness of large-scale protected areas<br />

has, at best, a mixed record of success (Brockington et al., 2008; Persha et al., 2011). Scientific<br />

disciplines, in particular, ecology and conservation biology, continue to emphasize threats to<br />

biodiversity (Schipper et al., 2008), to debate conservation priorities (Brooks et al., 2006), to<br />

advance unproven strategies (SSC, 2008), and to offer no more than hypothetical solutions to<br />

pressing problems (Milner-Gulland et al., 2010; Turner et al., 2007). The bulk of the scientific<br />

community remains tangential to the conservation needs of communities in habitat<br />

countries, with a critical lack of input and connectivity between the extensive scientific<br />

literature and ground-level practices (Milner-Gulland et al., 2010).<br />

Resurgence of the “fortress conservation”, “protectionist” narratives (commitment to<br />

conservation programs at the expense of indigenous and other local people) promoting a<br />

19 th century wilderness ideal free of humans remains a cornerstone of much conservation<br />

thought, policy, and planning. As pointed out by Brockington et al. (2008), commitment to<br />

community-based conservation “has been downplayed from being an approach to<br />

conservation to becoming a component to justify and legitimate interventions to create new<br />

protected areas or interventions to conserve specific species”. This “back to the barriers”<br />

movement (Hutton et al., 2005), supported by many conservation biologists (Kramer et al.,<br />

1997; Oates, 1999; Terborgh, 1999), has been accompanied by an increase in conservation<br />

funding, with large conservation organizations reverting back to protectionist landscape<br />

conservation and away from community-based (ground-level or bottom-up) resource<br />

management (Hutton et al., 2005).<br />

In his discussion of the ongoing conflicts between indigenous peoples’ movements and<br />

conservation organizations, Dowie (2009) noted: “When, after setting aside a ‘protected’<br />

land mass the size of Africa, global biodiversity continues to decline and the rate of species<br />

extinction approaches one-thousand times background levels, the message seems clear that


284<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

there might be something terribly wrong with this plan… A better strategy might be simply<br />

to turn more human beings into true conservationists....” Community conservation projects,<br />

at the core, are based on the strategy of turning more human beings into conservationists<br />

(see Persha et al., 2011). The approach pursues this goal by working with people living in<br />

species-rich landscapes, assisting them to form networks with one another, with<br />

community-based organizations, with non-government organizations, and with government<br />

agencies for the protection of biodiversity and ecosystems (Brockington et al., 2008). When<br />

implemented according to field-tested procedures, community conservation provides an<br />

effective ground-level solution to environmental degradation and the loss of biodiversity<br />

(Horwich & Lyon, 2007; Horwich et al., 2011). Indeed, 60-85% of conserved areas are<br />

inhabited by people who are potential conservationists and who are necessary components<br />

of success (Brockington et al., 2008; Horwich & Lyon, 2007; Horwich et al., 2011; Persha et<br />

al., 2011).<br />

One flaw inherent to debates over the community conservation approach entails the type of<br />

questions being asked: Is community conservation successful? Who should be responsible<br />

for protecting natural resources? These are not, however, the truly relevant questions.<br />

Community conservation is one solution to environmental degradation, deforestation and the<br />

loss of global biodiversity. The truly relevant question is: Why aren’t all conservationists,<br />

scientists, in particular, conservation biologists, and non-government organizations actively<br />

incorporating successful community conservation models into their mission statements,<br />

policies, and programs (see Persha et al., 2011)? Community conservation projects are<br />

growing in number and in success (Borrini-Feyerbend et al., 2004; Dowie, 2009; Horwich &<br />

Lyon, 2007; Horwich et al., 2011; IUCN, 2003). Indigenous and other local groups are<br />

gaining political power and expertise, becoming conservation activists, and, in some<br />

instances, regaining management of homelands (Dowie, 2009). Indeed, many communities<br />

have initiated sustainable conservation projects (Pathak et al., 2004). There is also recent<br />

evidence that community-managed tropical forests show lower and less variable annual<br />

deforestation rates than do the traditional protected areas (Porter-Bolland et al., 2011 In<br />

Press) with potential for reducing carbon loss effecting global climate change (Soares-Filho,<br />

2010). However, the effects of community and indigenous managed projects in terms of<br />

their geographic scale, recognition by professional conservationists, including many nongovernmental<br />

organizations, as well as their economic and political influence, are not yet<br />

sufficient to mitigate the deleterious effects of increasing environmental degradation and<br />

escalating loss of biodiversity. This condition persists, in part, because regional and<br />

governmental entities, as well as non-governmental organizations, have failed to include<br />

indigenous and other community stakeholders as partners (Persha et al., 2011). There is a<br />

need for national and regional governments and non-governmental organizations to<br />

network with community-based organizations having the mission, goals, and objectives to<br />

initiate, facilitate, train, and empower communities in habitat countries to preserve and<br />

manage local resources (Horwich & Lyon, 2007; Horwich et al., 2010; Persha et al., 2011).<br />

Unsuccessful project outcomes have been minimized by the Community Conservation<br />

(www.communityconservation.org) model developed over time by trial-and-error but by<br />

now tested in the field and proven to be a valid and reliable procedure with utility for other<br />

community-based programs, as demonstrated by the cases discussed below. Table 1 gives a<br />

list of 23 projects that Community Conservation, Inc. has either initiated or contributed<br />

significantly to in its earlier stages. Three points are important to note from this table. Most<br />

important is that the highest level of community participation has occurred by encouraging


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

the creation of community-based organizations to manage or contribute to the project.<br />

This also implies a high level of community empowerment. In Assam, <strong>India</strong>, the Manas<br />

Biosphere Reserve is now being protected by a network of 14 community groups<br />

(Horwich et al, 2010, Horwich et al., 2011). In this regard it is notable that the<br />

communities played a significant role in having UNESCO recently remove the “World<br />

Heritage Site in danger” listing. In the cloud forests of Peru, the Yellow Tailed Woolly<br />

Monkey Project has been stimulating community groups to create community reserves<br />

under Peruvian law. In Papua New Guinea, the Tree Kangaroo Conservation Program has<br />

created a community group that is a federation of over 26 clans. The second point is that<br />

community groups have stimulated or contributed to the creation of new protected areas<br />

or act as complementary protectors of public and private lands. Thirdly, communities can<br />

play a major role in regional or landscape protection as is occurring in the Golden Langur<br />

Conservation Project in the Manas Biosphere Reserve in Assam, <strong>India</strong> (Horwich et al.<br />

2010), the Tree Kangaroo Conservation Program in Papua New Guinea (Ancrenaz et al,<br />

2007) and what is evolving in the Yellow Tailed Woolly Monkey Project in the cloud forest<br />

of Peru (Shanee et al., 2007).<br />

Table 1. Updated list of Community Conservation projects with selected information.<br />

Our community-based model, comprised of nine social stages, progresses as follows: (1)<br />

initial contacts with community leaders and elders to catalyze informal communication with<br />

village inhabitants, providing opportunities to openly and candidly discuss the significance<br />

of their resources and benefits to be gained from cooperative and participatory initiatives for<br />

conservation of their natural resources fostering (2) informal relationship-building in<br />

indigenous and other local communities leading to (3) participatory education providing (4)<br />

a window of opportunity for local conservation leaders to emerge (5) who invoke support<br />

from others, in our cases, the majority of villagers fostering (6) development of a formal<br />

infrastructure and plans within the possibilities of each community context. Eventually, (7)<br />

285


286<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

as the cases presented in this article show, the lessons and activities implemented and<br />

learned in the initial target village diffuse through local networks of communication (e.g.,<br />

hearsay; printed information from enlightened schoolchildren to their kin) broadening<br />

matrices of conservation activists through other modes of social transmission and problemsolving<br />

(e.g., observational learning; imitation; education; brainstorming sessions and focus<br />

groups; contacts by the target community to members of other villages inviting them to<br />

inspect their conservation efforts and to attend planning sessions, lectures, seminars, and<br />

public events; informal and formal visits from target community members to other villages).<br />

The first seven social stages of our community-based, bottom-up model have the potential<br />

to foster (8) diffusion from the target village to other communities and, beyond, to regional<br />

entities through a process that we term conservation contagion consolidating the horizontal<br />

network (e.g., community-based organizations and communities: Berkes, 2004). Finally, (9)<br />

educational initiatives, lobbying, and relationship-building with entities in vertical networks<br />

(e.g., regional, governmental, non-governmental, and international entities: Berkes, 2004)<br />

have the potential for linkage, creating multidimensional, multi-scale partnerships<br />

benefiting all stakeholders. Our formulations, catalysis and community contagion, are<br />

detailed below.<br />

The objective of this Chapter is to illustrate how community conservation, when carried out<br />

in the field, using tried and proven methods, is an effective solution to reducing<br />

deforestation and the loss of biodiversity and consequent climate change and reduced<br />

carbon emmissions. Section 2 defines the philosophies, concepts and practices in small<br />

projects that lead to successful results in contrast to the preponderance of large Integrated<br />

Conservation and Development Projects (ICDPs) whose contrasting philosophies, concepts<br />

and practices have resulted in mainly failures at high costs. Section 3 introduces the concept<br />

of conservation contagion and how, when it is stimulated, can lead to regional change.<br />

Section 4 complements the other sections with examples of successful projects from Belize,<br />

<strong>India</strong> and Namibia, illustrating successes that led to regional change with increased<br />

community protection resulting in increased reforestation and increases in focal species.<br />

Section 5 discusses lessons learned from the process of community conservation and its<br />

examples. Finally section 6 gives policy implications for future successful possibilities.<br />

2. What makes a successful community conservation project (CCP)<br />

Community conservation or community-based conservation projects under a number of<br />

names have been developed over the past two decades as important alternatives to the<br />

traditional protected areas that exclude humans. Community Conservation, Inc. (CC), and<br />

other non-governmental organizations are project identifiers used in the present chapter to<br />

designate ground-level initiatives developed over the past two decades as important<br />

alternatives to traditional conservation organizations, historically prioritizing protected<br />

areas independent of human interests and often excluding indigenous and other local<br />

groups from targeted areas (“fortress conservation”). These community conservation<br />

projects have been based on ethical, theoretical, and practical arguments of conservation<br />

practitioners and social scientists (Borrini-Feyerabend, 1996; Broad, 1994; Brosius et al., 1998;<br />

Davey, 1998; Gadgil & Guha, 1993; Ham et al., 1993; Johnson, 1992; Oates, 1999; Stolton &<br />

Dudley, 1999). However, in recent years there has been growing criticism of communitybased<br />

conservation programs and a call for renewal of protected areas that exclude local


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

communities from the programs and their management (Brandon et al., 1998; Inamdar et al.,<br />

1999; Robinson, 1993; Terborgh, 1999).<br />

While many critics of community conservation projects are biologists (Oates, 1999;<br />

Terborgh, 1999), social scientists have also criticized these projects (Belsky, 1999; Brechin et<br />

al., 2002). Most of the criticism has been directed toward large integrated conservation and<br />

development projects (ICDPs) while the successes of small community-based projects have<br />

been overlooked (Horwich & Lyon, 2007). Even practitioners of ICDPs, however, have been<br />

disappointed by their limited achievements (Robinson & Redford, 2005) and are attempting<br />

to learn from their failures to maximize future success (McShane & Wells, 2004; Rhoades &<br />

Stalling, 2001). What seems clear at present is that ICDPs have been adhering to a faulty<br />

paradigm and have much to learn from community conservation and community-based<br />

forestry paradigms (Shepard, 2004).<br />

The philosophies of community conservation, community-based conservation and<br />

integrated conservation and development projects “originated from a shift in protected area<br />

management away from keeping people out by strict protection and toward more<br />

sympathetic treatment of local communities, including efforts to share benefits from the<br />

conservation of biodiversity“ (Wells et al., 2004). However, the philosophy and methods by<br />

which activities are carried out are extremely different between large ICDPs and smaller<br />

community conservation projects. These different postures have resulted in the lumping of<br />

unjustified criticism of our community conservation projects (Belsky, 1999, 2000) resulting in<br />

curtailed progress. Thus, it is important to differentiate the two organizational models.<br />

Community conservation projects are centered on conservation of natural resources and<br />

the role they play in the lives of indigenous and other local, rural peoples. Dealing with<br />

people on a one-to-one basis at a community scale has been a primary focus of Community<br />

Conservation’s projects. Optimally, the limited resources of community conservation<br />

projects, especially finances, are best distributed over a long time-period in order to use<br />

them efficiently and prudently. While natural resource conservation is central to<br />

Community Conservation’s priorities, it is followed closely by the needs of rural indigenous<br />

and other local populations, not only economic, but also social ones, emphasizing quality<br />

of life.<br />

There are some fundamental differences between how successful community conservation<br />

projects and most ICDPs approach a project (Table 2). Community conservation projects are<br />

holistic. Flexibility and the expectation of change are important to their success; thus,<br />

practitioners must be adaptable, learning from problems as well as successes. Regional<br />

planning can be accomplished by building on, and expanding from, small community<br />

projects, from the specific projects to the general goals, objectives and mission that fits the<br />

composite project and region. Community conservation projects focus more on doing than<br />

on planning. The primary role of community conservationists is as catalysts to educate,<br />

motivate, and reinforce residents and communities in habitat countries to protect and<br />

conserve their natural resources both for themselves and for the rest of the world. While<br />

projects should be long-term and on-going, the catalytic role generally ends once<br />

community members are prepared to assume responsibility for programs in their<br />

communities and regions. ICDPs, instead, generally have been pervasive in time and space,<br />

with no plans to exit their initiatives or to transfer leadership to indigenous and other local<br />

residents (Sayer & Wells, 2004).<br />

287


288<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Table 2. Major differences between community conservation projects (CCPs) and integrated<br />

conservation and development projects (ICDPs).<br />

2.1 Rural people are the solution not the problem<br />

Another difference between community conservation projects and ICDPs concerns<br />

significant philosophical differences resulting in very different approaches and practices.<br />

ICDPs conceptualize local communities as generators of habitat degradation (McShane &<br />

Newby, 2004; McShane & Wells, 2004) based on the premise that humans utilize natural<br />

resources and may abuse them when community and governmental regulating systems<br />

break down, characteristic of the “tragedy of the commons” (Feeney et al., 1990; Hardin,<br />

1968). However, if rural indigenous and other local people are seen as threats, they will have<br />

a greater probability of living up to that expectation. In contrast, when people depend on<br />

resources, they may be educated to understand that they must not over-exploit resources<br />

without losing them. Because they use them, they have knowledge of and appreciate them.<br />

Living on site, they can better protect the resources. But there are also many outside forces<br />

competing with rural residents for resources. Thus, by giving rural indigenous and other<br />

local people entitlement and responsibility over their resources, many will see the<br />

importance of biodiversity conservation. Indeed, in almost all cases, when we have asked<br />

local rural people for their help in protecting their natural resources, they have responded<br />

very favorably and effectively.<br />

2.2 Community scale at a personal level<br />

Another philosophical difference between community conservation projects and ICDPs is<br />

that ICDPs approach conservation on a large scale, possibly because donor agencies think


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

financially in those terms. However, major outlays of money and other resources for short<br />

time-periods have proven to be ineffective, inducing greed, waste, mismanagement and<br />

corruption. It may also highlight differences between the community base and corrupt<br />

western affluence (Gezon, 1997). More importantly, in order to work successfully with small<br />

rural communities, initiatives must cooperate at the lowest levels of community and<br />

regional organization, engaging personal, face-to face communication involving the<br />

thoughts, emotions, beliefs, attitudes and values of indigenous and other local stakeholders<br />

who are the voices of most decision-making, problem-solving and negotiations. The rural<br />

poor embody the same desires to assume responsibility for and to manage their own affairs<br />

as others, regardless of economic position. As a result, community involvement is an<br />

important ingredient for all conservation projects. Even when protecting large landscapes,<br />

community conservation projects can be effective at the regional scale by dividing initiatives<br />

into ground-level components for the retention of person-to-person interactions fostering<br />

trust and friendship. This process is exemplified by the case study of a community-based<br />

project in Assam, <strong>India</strong> (Horwich et al., 2010).<br />

2.3 Community conservation projects – below the “conservation radar”<br />

While ICDP enthusiasts have undergone some soul searching because of the backlash and<br />

criticism from biologists and sociologists, they have rightly begun to learn from ICDP<br />

failures (McShane & Wells, 2004). Unfortunately, small community conservation projects<br />

have been neglected and are “below the radar” of the mainstream conservation community<br />

(see Horwich & Lyon, 2007) not withstanding published accounts of successes as well as<br />

problems of such projects (Horwich, 1990a, 1998, 2005; Horwich & Lyon, 1988, 1995, 1998,<br />

1999; Horwich et al., 1993; Lyon & Horwich, 1996). Despite documented successes of<br />

community-based initiatives, funding for these projects has also been under the<br />

conservation radar, remaining at very low levels.<br />

Similarly, published articles have also ignored benefits to local communities from<br />

conservation of forests and their resources upon which indigenous and other local groups<br />

may depend (Shepard, 2004). Shepard (2004) notes “ conservation organizations themselves<br />

form their own international environment in which they talk to and argue with one another.<br />

Because they spend so much of their time in this company, there is too little exchange of<br />

ideas with those engaged in the forestry and poverty worlds.” She goes on to state that<br />

”ICDPs and the conservation bodies that manage them have been out of the mainstream of<br />

changing thought about forest management and rural livelihoods and now risk getting<br />

stuck with an old-fashioned paradigm. Though it will always be difficult to persuade people<br />

to abandon some of their old assumptions, it is now urgent that they consider doing so.”<br />

(Shepard, 2004).<br />

2.4 Community participation<br />

Level of participation - Communities are complex, heterogeneous groups of people with<br />

conflicting goals, aims, and desires. Complexities based on gender, politics, class, patronage,<br />

ethnicity, age, social standing and religion often have complex social histories that include<br />

exploitation, marginalization, and conflict (DuPuis & Vandergeest, 1996). For the last<br />

decade, the terms of community conservation, community participation, community-based<br />

conservation became buzz words as community conservation projects and ICDPs were in<br />

289


290<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

vogue. However, what has never often been clearly differentiated is that community<br />

involvement can occur at many levels in a continuum from top-down management through<br />

informal and formal consultation to formal advisory committees and ultimately to<br />

community co-management and indigenous management (see Horwich & Lyon, 2007;<br />

Horwich et al., 2004) as discussed by Arnstein (1969), Berkes (1994), Barrow (1996) and<br />

Stevens (1997). Thus in any project, the level of community participation must be clearly<br />

identified. The main thrust in the projects that we sponsor is to facilitate, particularly by<br />

persuasion and education, creation of an empowered community-based group capable of<br />

continuing a project once we have left it (Table 1). The lowest levels of government<br />

involvement and the highest levels of community participation, as represented by<br />

indigenous and other local community co-management, allow for strong partners in<br />

decision-making and project control. Co-management allows for government checks and<br />

balances and support; as well, indigenous and other local management is currently working<br />

well at one of our projects, the Community Baboon Sanctuary in Belize, discussed below.<br />

Incentives for community participation - Top-down government management or private<br />

ownership are not the only ways to conserve and protect natural resources. Historically,<br />

many successful indigenous communal systems were working before Europeans came to<br />

dominate most natural landscapes. Singleton (1998) mentions institutions used by the Pacific<br />

Northwest Native Americans before the Europeans reached those shores. There have since<br />

been many struggles of poor people to regain those rights (Guha, 1989). Thus community<br />

conservation efforts have the potential to redefine and restructure managerial systems. This<br />

provides an enormous incentive for community participation and as has been shown by<br />

many forest projects (Poffenberger & Gean, 1996), and other Self Help development<br />

programs (Wilson, 2002), villagers have responded by being empowered to assume<br />

responsibility for their resources. On the other hand, efforts of ICDPs, offering a wealth of<br />

developmental possibilities to these same rural residents, often failed generally because of<br />

the limitations discussed below.<br />

Uphoff and Langholz (1998) present a model of three basic categories of incentives for<br />

people to conserve or exploit protected resources: 1) legal, 2) financial or 3) social/cultural.<br />

According to these authors, if initiatives incorporate all of these elements, they have a high<br />

probability of being adopted. Projects lacking the features have a low likelihood of being<br />

adopted. The authors noted that rewards from ICDPs’ conservation tactics “amounted to<br />

tacit bribes” for getting villagers to adopt new practices depending upon an infusion of<br />

outside resources. These “bribes” seemed to undermine community practices for the<br />

conservation of resources. An integrated balance of these three factors is needed to induce<br />

conservation,. Uphoff and Langholz (1998) make a strong case for the importance of social<br />

values leading to stewardship of natural resources, echoing what we have found in our<br />

experiences with community-based conservation. Although money was one motivator in<br />

our project at the Community Baboon Sanctuary in Belize, community members consistently<br />

demonstrated pride in their conservation efforts, especially their flagship “baboons” (the<br />

local term for black howler monkeys, Alouatta pigra). In Assam, the pride of achievement<br />

was integral to project success exemplified by local leaders reporting their accomplishments<br />

in developing Self Help Groups and forestry committees. These entities continue to provide<br />

important social functions for meeting and talking, for practicing thrift, and for receiving<br />

information on a short term basis (Wilson, 2002). More importantly, they have “a more


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

powerful purpose: to gain and share information, to take social action, and to link to<br />

government resources.”(Wilson, 2002). It is that power that has stimulated some of the local<br />

forestry groups in Assam to actively protect their forests for themselves and for the pride to<br />

convey their actions to project partners. There is also no surprise that rural villagers also<br />

appreciate natural areas for their beauty and greenness and enjoyed walking and sitting in<br />

the shade and seeing wildlife (Allendorf, 2007).<br />

Despite what we have found, the conservation community has focused on poverty and<br />

economic incentives as a prime motivator of poor rural communities. Indeed, a great deal of<br />

money has been spent on ICDPs and “despite this high level of investment and effort, we<br />

can only point to some individual, localized successes. Taken as a whole, we have had little<br />

impact on stemming or even slowing the rising tide of biodiversity loss.” (Kiss, 2004). In<br />

addition, little money from the large grants ever reached the beneficiaries on the ground<br />

level (Sayer & Wells, 2004). Indeed, when we look at the levels of funding in comparison<br />

with small successful community conservation project budgets, the failures in spending are<br />

extensive, almost obscenely wasteful.<br />

From 1990 to 2004, Kiss (2004) notes that the World Bank has supported 226 conservationrelated<br />

projects internationally with a total budget of $2.65 billion (from a variety of funding<br />

sources). In terms of prudent financing, $2.65 billion divided by 226 projects and by 14 years<br />

gives an average annual project budget of some $837,547. In comparison, two small<br />

successful community conservation projects annually averaged $12,035 (Community<br />

Baboon Sanctuary) for six years and $22,367 (Golden Langur Conservation Project in Assam,<br />

<strong>India</strong>) for seven years. ICDPs spent over 40 times that of the community conservation<br />

projects. While it is difficult to assess the total impact of all the World Bank projects relative<br />

to the two community conservation projects noted, it is clear that the scale of funding is<br />

dramatically different.<br />

Despite this financial information, many of the tenets that hold for successful community<br />

conservation are paradoxical. However, research has shown that rural people do not always<br />

act rationally and in their own interests (Ariely, 2010). <strong>India</strong>n rural villagers were asked to<br />

do various tasks for three levels of pay. Those who could earn the equivalent of one day’s<br />

pay or two weeks pay did not differ. However, those who could earn the equivalent of 5<br />

months pay did the task significantly worse. Ariely (2010) noted that using money to<br />

motivate people could be counter-intuitive. For tasks requiring cognitive ability, low to<br />

moderate performance-based incentives can help. But if financial incentives are too high, the<br />

attention to the reward becomes distracting and creates stress that reduces the level of<br />

performance.<br />

2.5 Project implementation<br />

Planning versus implementation – ICDPs have invested a great deal of time and energy in<br />

project preparation, often executed by outside experts. These practices increase budgets and<br />

restrict program flexibility (Sayer & Wells, 2004). Community Conservation projects, in<br />

contrast, initiate ground-level efforts immediately, with some research, preparation and<br />

planning integrated into the early stages of a project. From the beginning, formal, expert<br />

knowledge and information have been united with local expertise throughout every stage of<br />

our programs as documented in the cases detailed in the present report.<br />

Flexibility and adaptability – While the ICDP paradigm attempts to reduce uncertainty<br />

through over-planning and preparation (Sayer & Wells, 2004), the community conservation<br />

291


292<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

approach is resilient and capable of adapting to change. Although general planning is<br />

necessary, too much emphasis on planning and accompanying financial investments have<br />

plagued ICDPs and often left them with a legacy of inflexibility (Sayer & Wells, 2004).<br />

Further, it is likely that one disadvantage of the mainstream ICDP model is that it<br />

establishes unrealistic expectations and levels of resource-access for community members.<br />

With generalized goals from the initiation of our projects that are adaptable to the features<br />

of different local projects, we maximize flexibility and influence by relying primarily upon<br />

local resources, providing models that can be sustained by indigenous and other local<br />

groups over the long-term. In addition, since resource efficiency was necessary, particularly<br />

due to our limited funding, we developed contingency plans in the event that opportunistic<br />

responses were required.<br />

Funding and project length – Many mainstream ICDPs arguably wasted large amounts of<br />

money, often because of utilization of templates applied to all situations regardless of<br />

differences from locale to locale and project to project and also because, seemingly<br />

paradoxically, promiscuous infusion of resources unsuited to differing project scales has the<br />

effect of compromising the planning, efficiency, “goodness-of-fit”, and effectiveness of<br />

programs. Furthermore, resources often fail to impact the intended beneficiaries and their<br />

resources, directed, instead, into staff and consulting fees, centralized planning, and<br />

problem-solving and decision-making divorced from local community realities,<br />

requirements, criteria, and contingencies (Gezon, 1997; Sayer & Wells, 2004). In some cases,<br />

large amounts of resources were invested in small regions for short periods of time, draining<br />

critical resources for wider and more judicious efforts (Sayer & Wells, 2004). ICDPs<br />

generally forecast 3-5 years per project, a standardized time-frame often too brief, on the one<br />

hand, or unnecessarily extended, on the other, for successful implementation of their goals<br />

and objectives. Furthermore, ICDPs often fail to project and plan exit strategies, sometimes<br />

leading to abrupt termination of or unproductively extending involvement with community<br />

projects (Sayer & Wells, 2004). Our community-based conservation projects, instead, utilize<br />

modest funding consistent with local economies, maximizing project realism, “goodness-offit”,<br />

and successful long-term persistence. It is our position that both community<br />

conservation projects and ICDPs entail costs as well as benefits and that cooperation among<br />

these networks has the potential to minimize the disadvantages and maximize the<br />

advantages of all tactics and strategies.<br />

Project sustainability – While ICDPs were initiated with the hope of financial sustainability<br />

(Wells et al., 2004), our community conservation projects often have, as a goal, partial<br />

sustainability. In developing countries, entrance and user fees earned, for example, by<br />

ecotourism, classes on ethnobotany, or small businesses (e.g., restaurants serving and selling<br />

traditional foods) might promote village sustainability, pride in efforts supporting local<br />

conservation programs, expansion of the local economy, and imitation by other groups.<br />

Success of programs is not necessarily correlated with predictions from conservation<br />

biology or other scientific approaches, e.g, mathematical modeling, because factors critical to<br />

short- and long-term successes often arise as spontaneous, condition-dependent events. For<br />

example, the residents of the Community Baboon Sanctuary suggested a plan for<br />

sustainability based on mandating residents to take turns as local guides, denoting a more<br />

mature stage of project implementation as well as a potential template for other community<br />

conservation projects. With an increase to 6000 tourists, visiting the Community Baboon


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Sanctuary, base-level financial sustainability became a reality, with additional programs<br />

requiring and stimulated by short-term grants (Horwich & Lyon, 1998). In reality,<br />

community or government protected areas in developing countries still need richer nations<br />

to infuse conservation efforts with financial and other resources (Wells et al., 2004; Balmford<br />

& Whitten, 2003); alternatively, other creative ideas such as trust funds or direct payments<br />

need to be considered (Kiss, 2004). Social sustainability of most Community Conservation, Inc.<br />

projects occurred because of sufficient, motivated, and prepared social capital combined<br />

with social and other (e.g., modest and targeted economic) incentives (Uphoff & Langholz,<br />

1998; Wilson, 2002). Although the Community Baboon Sanctuary has experienced<br />

significant challenges over time, it has persisted for over twenty-six years because<br />

community-based conservation became a guiding ethic in the minds and lives of local<br />

people. When the Community Baboon Santuary reached a turning-point in 1998, a local<br />

group of women formed the Woman’s Conservation Group to ensure its continuity and<br />

long-range stability (Horwich et al., 2011).<br />

Integrating conservation and development - While there is no question that, consistent<br />

with the mission of ICDPs, conservation and development should be integrated,<br />

community-based organizations have not developed explicit proposals for how the<br />

integration should be structured and implemented (Sayer & Wells, 2004). ICDPs maintained<br />

the false assumption that helping communities develop economically would lead to the<br />

conservation of natural resources (McShane & Newby, 2004). However, the opposite often<br />

happened as discussed above. A holistic approach of integrating conservation and<br />

development is, ceteris patibus, effective because economics is only one of the incentives<br />

communities respond to. A holistic plan may be a highly productive approach to integrating<br />

social incentives, development and conservation through facilitating the development of<br />

networks consisting of ground-level associations (individual and group) of communitybased<br />

organizations and non-governmental organizations based on trust.<br />

Financial donors - While donors provide the essential financing for successful projects and<br />

want their contributions recognized, it is to the benefit of community-based organizations if<br />

they provide a mentoring rather than a “hands-on” or otherwise controlling posture,<br />

particularly because community-based operations often require opportunistic responses to<br />

local conditions and processes that cannot easily be detailed in an application for funding<br />

and for short-range assessment by funding agencies. Donors to ICDPs often had controlling<br />

interests in these projects (Sayer & Wells, 2004). Community Conservation, Inc.’s project<br />

finances have been modest, falling under the “conservation community radar” as noted<br />

earlier. As a result, donor agencies generally did not attempt to maintain control of their<br />

investments; however, they rarely publicized successes of the community conservation<br />

projects, emphasizing, instead, large, “flagship” funding recipients likely to reinforce<br />

powerful and influential national and international networks.<br />

Non-governmental organization role – Non-governmental organizations can facilitate the<br />

empowerment of community-based organizations by providing seed money or by acting as<br />

a financial and tactical mentor. They can also provide management training for the<br />

community-based organizations (Horwich et al., 2004). Training would optimally be a<br />

combination of long-term mentoring combined with, for example, short-term seminars<br />

(Bernstein, 2005). Although others are skeptical that local communities are the best<br />

managers of their natural resources (McShane & Newby, 2004), Community Conservation<br />

293


294<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

takes the position that indigenous and other local populations are, with training and other<br />

support (e.g., interactive networking), capable, even ideal, stewards of biodiversity in and<br />

surrounding their traditional lands because of the nature and degree of their historical<br />

connections with and investments in these habitat domains.<br />

A powerful and effective function of non-governmental organizations is to catalyze and<br />

facilitate communities to protect their natural environment (Horwich, 1990a; Horwich et al.,<br />

2004) and to help them create new community-based organizations whose mission is<br />

environmental conservation (Agrawal & Gibson, 1999). Non-governmental organizations<br />

should retreat after the community-based organization develops capacities to function<br />

independently. However, non-governmental organizations should continuously monitor the<br />

progress of projects, providing additional advice and support when required and solicited.<br />

In 1989, subsequent to catalyzing a community conservation project around the Temash<br />

River in Belize, a biologically important mangrove habitat, the government was not<br />

supportive of our organization’s contingency plans. By 1997, three years after the zone was<br />

designated a protected area, our re-catalyzing the project through a meeting involving all<br />

stakeholders (Producciones de la Hamaca & Community Conservation Consultants, 1998)<br />

led to a newly formed indigenous Belizean non-governmental organization managed by<br />

Belize nationals in cooperation with local communities, creating a comprehensive project<br />

(Horwich, 2005; Caddy et al., 2000).<br />

2.6 Stimulating regional change from the bottom up<br />

In an effort to revise the role of ICDPs, it has been suggested that they are well situated to<br />

work at a landscape scale, integrating with networks at this level (Robinson & Redford,<br />

2004). However, small community conservation projects should not be excluded from these<br />

plans since they can be employed at a regional scale by initiating a number of community<br />

level projects within a region and having them collaborate, eventually unifying them into a<br />

larger project or federation that would include all of the participating community-based<br />

organizations, non-governmental organizations and government agencies (Horwich et al.,<br />

2010). An ultimate goal should be integration of networks and clear delineation of functions<br />

(e.g., managerial, social, political, economic, etc.) at all levels of organization.<br />

Even though ICDPs often have functioned on the false assumption that national<br />

governments would embrace the idea of community involvement and pass laws and<br />

regulations to facilitate the community involvement in natural resource management<br />

(McShane & Newby, 2004), working with governments and their agencies to revise old and<br />

develop new policies remains an important objective. In Belize, successes of and publicity<br />

about the Community Baboon Sanctuary led other motivated communities to adopt that<br />

model, sometimes with modifications, creating their own conservation project, adapted to<br />

their own circumstances. Additionally, communities lobbied the Belize government to create<br />

new sanctuaries, using existing laws to create community-based sanctuaries and protected<br />

areas and the Belize government eventually adopted a community co-management policy<br />

(Meerman, 2005). Because the government of Belize recognized significant progress at<br />

community levels, forestry and fisheries agencies contracted with community-based<br />

organizations and non-governmental organizations to sign memoranda of understanding.<br />

Currently, approximately twenty village and town groups have signed or are in the process<br />

of negotiating such agreements (Young & Horwich, 2007) (Figures 1 & 2).


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

In Assam, <strong>India</strong>, the Golden Langur Conservation Project, initiated by Community<br />

Conservation, Natures Foster and Green Forest Conservation in 1998, targeted the full <strong>India</strong>n<br />

range of the golden langur in western Assam. Through village meetings, seminars and<br />

general meetings the project brought civil authorities, non-governmental organizations and<br />

communities together. As communities participated in the project they formed communitybased<br />

groups leading to conservation contagion. Early on, the project focused on the Manas<br />

Biosphere, the largest main habitat of the golden langur in <strong>India</strong>. The project brought<br />

attention to the Manas Biosphere through a series of four celebrations throughout the<br />

Biosphere finally resulting in participation of 20,000 and then 35,000 attendees. A number of<br />

community groups formed and began carrying out forest protection patrols that were later<br />

funded by the Bodoland Territorial Council. Eventually, the project stimulated the<br />

organization of a network to meet and discuss protection of the entire Biosphere.<br />

Collectively, this led to regional change resulting in an increase of forest renewal and an<br />

increase of the targeted species throughout its <strong>India</strong>n range from 1500 to now over 5600<br />

golden langurs (Horwich et al., 2010, 2011). There are also indications of an increase of both<br />

the elephant population (Ghosh, 2008b) and the tiger population (Anonymous, 2011). This<br />

community protection network played a major role in the UNESCO delisting Manas as a<br />

World Heritage Site in danger.<br />

3. Catalyzing conservation contagion<br />

Community conservation practitioners must view themselves as catalysts to stimulate and<br />

guide indigenous and local people, building their capacity and encouraging them to assume<br />

responsibility for creating solutions to the natural resource challenges in their communities.<br />

In the parlance of chemistry, catalysts (e.g., Community Conservation personnel) reduce the<br />

so-called energy of activation (i.e., ignorance of, passivity to, disinterest in, or resistance to<br />

conservation initiatives) to stimulate a reaction (e.g., progressive and sustainable<br />

conservation programs). In our experience, programmatic initiatives have the potential to<br />

spread to other communities and, often, throughout regions by a process of diffusion that<br />

we term conservation contagion. Sometimes conservation contagion diffuses more broadly,<br />

influencing protectionist policies at the country-wide or even international levels. Initially,<br />

these objectives may require non-governmental organizations to take a prominent, leading<br />

role. However, as a community becomes increasingly empowered and independent, the<br />

practitioner-organizers become less and less visible, and members of the community emerge<br />

as primary leaders. Although our 9-stage social model incorporates a number of catalytic<br />

factors facilitating the occurrence of conservation contagion processes (e.g., building trust<br />

with village members, infusing information via local networks), in reality, on the ground,<br />

they are intimately integrated with the social and cultural process, what Berkes (2004) terms<br />

“social-ecological systems”. Thus, successful development, management, and stabilization<br />

of horizontal networks are not automatic, linear processes but complex and dynamic ones<br />

over time and space. Our case studies from Belize, Namibia, and <strong>India</strong> exemplify<br />

individuals, community-based organizations, and non-governmental organizations<br />

catalyzing indigenous and other local people to participate in conservation initiatives<br />

followed by conservation contagion resulting from application of our 9-stage model.<br />

Catalyzing conservation contagion alone does not guarantee program success without<br />

application of all stages in our model that, although a dynamic process, significantly<br />

295


296<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

tempers the programmatic, unstructured, and unpredictable state that Westley et al. (2006)<br />

call, “getting to maybe”.<br />

Conservation contagion may sound like a fuzzy or murky concept, but, when one sees the<br />

results, it is an important phenomenon that deserves study and the awareness of<br />

community conservation practitioners. The word contagion has both a negative meaning, as<br />

in the spreading of disease, and a more neutral meaning, as the rapid communication of an<br />

influence. In a sense, the phenomenon of trends that are communicated rapidly may be<br />

thought to spread like epidemics with three characteristics: 1) contagiousness, 2) small<br />

causes can have large effects and 3) change happens not gradually but at one dramatic<br />

moment (Gladwell, 2002). Given these characteristics, research on such phenomena would<br />

be difficult. However, studies on human networks (Christakis & Fowler, 2009) may give us<br />

some insight into conservation contagion.<br />

Since we have not carried out any research on the communications, social networks, or<br />

person-to-person interactions important in creating instances of conservation contagion we<br />

have observed, we can give only a start to understanding conservation contagion by listing<br />

and discussing some anecdotal observations that both seem to play a role in the<br />

phenomenon and show that contagion is occurring. We have identified eight facets: 1)<br />

copying of methods to initiate other projects, 2) person-to-person contacts, 3) presentations<br />

and responses to them, 4) formation of new community conservation organizations, 5)<br />

requests by communities or community groups to join an existing project, 6) knowledge of a<br />

project and requests for help by other communities, 7) large crowds at events and 8) creating<br />

project publicity within the country. Examples of some of these will be described and<br />

discussed in the following sections on Belize and Assam, <strong>India</strong>.<br />

4. Examples of successful community conservation projects<br />

4.1 Belize<br />

In the early 1980’s, cooperative organization and planning among Horwich, Lyon, and<br />

members of a community in Belize District, northwest of Belize City, led to the<br />

establishment of the Community Baboon Sanctuary dedicated to preservation of the<br />

endangered black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) and its moist tropical forest habitat<br />

(Horwich & Lyon, 1988). This project led to development of a local ecotourism industry<br />

(Horwich et al., 1993). By 1990, the Community Baboon Sanctuary spawned creation of the<br />

country’s first rural museum, managed semi-independently under the umbrella of the Belize<br />

Audubon Society (BAS). At this time, Horwich and Lyon formed Community Conservation<br />

(Horwich 1990a, 2005; Horwich & Lyon, 1995, 1998, 1999; Young & Horwich, 2007),<br />

initiating what would become an international network of ground-level, bottom-up<br />

programs.<br />

In the Community Baboon Sanctuary project, Community Conservation and other nongovernmental<br />

organizations functioned as catalysts, first by initiating locally-based<br />

programs and, subsequently, by educating village leaders about the short-, mid-and longrange<br />

value of biodiversity preservation. At a later stage, community leaders employed their<br />

legitimate authority to influence village residents and to disseminate information, often<br />

through delegates. Once this stage successfully affected participation in conservation efforts<br />

and established community-based infrastructures devoted to conservation, committed<br />

villagers were recruited to serve as workers dedicated to managing and sustaining<br />

conservation programs (e.g., as office workers or guards to eject poachers from protected


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

lands). Outside organizers (e.g., Community Conservation personnel) were subsequently freed<br />

to devote attention to additional community-based conservation enterprises while<br />

continuing to maintain contact with and provide support to villages when required and<br />

solicited. In some cases, a small cadre of organizers maintained a physical presence in or<br />

near communities with viable conservation infrastructures, continuing to serve as<br />

facilitators and advisors, at least over the short term. In other instances in Belize, former<br />

organizers remained in villages as researchers or employees.<br />

In the 1990s, through a process of conservation contagion, formal publicity and informal<br />

dissemination of information about the Community Baboon Sanctuary stimulated and<br />

influenced many rural Belizean communities to cooperate, exerting pressure on central<br />

government for participation in their conservation initiatives. These events ultimately<br />

influenced the Belizean government to create a series of protected areas (Young & Horwich,<br />

2007) as well as a country-wide network of Special Development Areas including<br />

indigenous and local groups inhabiting the newly protected landscapes (McGill, 1994). In<br />

1994, the Belize government coordinated an ecotourism seminar (Vincent, 1994), published a<br />

community tourism booklet, and created a video on community-based tourism. In addition,<br />

the Belize Departments of Forestry and Fisheries began to negotiate informal and, later,<br />

formal co-management agreements with communities (Young & Horwich, 2007).<br />

Cooperative development of the Community Baboon Sanctuary catalyzed a series of<br />

reactions (conservation contagion from local level to central government: a “vertical<br />

network”) arising from our community-based conservation model. By 1991, communities<br />

led by St. Margaret’s Village, adjacent to Five Blues Lake, lobbied the government of Belize<br />

to create Five Blues Lake National Park and other protected areas in response to the<br />

country’s rapidly developing ecotourism industry (Young & Horwich, 2007). In 1992, the<br />

Minister of Tourism, Glenn Godfrey, embraced the Gales Point Project, subsequently<br />

leading government to include it in a new Special Development Area, a step preliminary to<br />

creation of a protected area in the region (McGill, 1994).<br />

In 1997, the Inuit Council of Canada visited Belize’s southern Toledo District, an area of<br />

Mayan concentration, to coordinate a seminar on co-management with the Kekchi Council<br />

of Belize (an indigenous Mayan organization), citing the Community Baboon Sanctuary as<br />

an example of community co-management. Eight years earlier in 1989, however, Community<br />

Conservation gathered signatures of local governments in three Toledo villages to initiate a<br />

cooperative plan for a Toledo Biosphere Reserve, composed of the Temash River, an<br />

important mangrove habitat, the Columbia Forest Reserve, and the Sapodilla Cayes<br />

(Horwich, 1990b). At that time, there was community support for the plan, but regional<br />

politicians showed no interest.<br />

Following the central government’s creation of the Sarstoon-Temash National Park in 1994,<br />

independent of input by communities impacted by the plan, Horwich traveled to Toledo in<br />

1997 to re-catalyze and revive a component of the Toledo Biosphere initiative. A strategy<br />

was devised whereby Horwich would work with Judy Lumb, a resident of Belize with ties<br />

to the Garifuna community in southern Belize, to organize a conference on community comanagement<br />

for the Sarstoon-Temash National Park stakeholders (see Producciones de la<br />

Hamaca & Community Conservation Consultants, 1998). From that event, the Sarstoon-<br />

Temash Institute of Indigenous Management (SATIIM), an indigenous-based nongovernmental<br />

organization created by Mayans and Garifuna, was developed to coordinate<br />

impacted communities and to manage the National Park using our model.<br />

297


298<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Based on the success and aftermath of the conference, Horwich and Lyon obtained a United<br />

Nations Development Project (UNDP) grant for the Belize-based Protected Areas<br />

Conservation Trust (PACT, 1998) to create a community co-management park system. In<br />

contrast to the Namibian case described below, PACT’s steering committee significantly<br />

modified project goals, leading to failure and abandonment of plans for the initiative<br />

(Catzim, 2002). However, a concrete result of our community-based conservation efforts in<br />

Belize was the central government’s eventual adoption of community co-management as<br />

national policy (Meerman, 2005) and signing of agreements with communities to co-manage<br />

at least a dozen protected areas distributed throughout Belize - both terrestrial and marine<br />

(Figure 1). Thus, implementation of the Community Conservation model generated the<br />

process of a conservation contagion that proved successful beyond anyone’s projections.<br />

Eventually, the Government of Belize supported enhancement of local natural resource<br />

management and production of systemic changes in conservation policy at the national<br />

level. However, it should also be noted that minimal government resources and political<br />

commitment (Catzim, 2002) have left many communities with insufficient support and no<br />

interconnected co-management system despite their interest in and will to proceed with<br />

conservation initiatives. Thus conservation contagion must be coupled with appropriate and<br />

sustainable support to achieve maximum impact.<br />

Fig. 1. Map of Belize showing distribution of the 12 community co-managed protected areas<br />

(dots) and the Community Baboon Sanctuary (arrow)


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Figure 2 shows a synopsis of the catalyzing influences and social network of interactions<br />

that were occurring in Belize that led to the conservation contagion (for details, see Young &<br />

Horwich, 2007). The Community Baboon Sanctuary was initiated in 1985 in affiliation with<br />

the Belize Audubon Society, the latter having been commissioned by the Belizean<br />

government in 1984 to administer the existing park system. This partnership led to meetings<br />

between the Community Baboon Sanctuary Manager, the late Fallet Young, and the Director<br />

of the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Ernesto Saqui, an employee of the Belize<br />

Audubon Society. With the Community Baboon Sanctuary becoming widely publicized<br />

nationally and internationally, it had a conservation influence on rural communities<br />

country-wide (Government of Belize, 1998). In 1988, Young addressed the village of Monkey<br />

River, eventually catalyzing that community to move the government to create Payne’s<br />

Creek Wildlife Sanctuary, that had a significant population of howlers (Horwich et al., 1993).<br />

By the early 1990s, three other projects were developed using our model: Slate Creek and<br />

Siete Milas village project in 1991 in the Mayan Mountains (Bevis & Bevis, 1991), a sea turtle<br />

nesting project initiated on Ambergris Cay by Greg Smith which was moved to Gales Point<br />

in 1992 when we initiated the Gales Point Manatee project (Lyon & Horwich, 1996); and, the<br />

Community Hicatee (turtle) Sanctuary along the Sibun River in 1994. Siete Milas later<br />

worked with Itzamna, a community-based organization co-managing the Elio Panti<br />

National Park in the Mayan Mountains.<br />

Many rural communities in Belize, seeing the efforts of the Community Baboon Sanctuary<br />

villages, realized that they too could participate in the growing conservation/ecotourism<br />

movement and stimulated the government to create protected areas adjacent to their<br />

communities (Horwich & Lyon, 1999). St. Margaret's village initiated the establishment of<br />

Five Blues Lake National Park on Earth Day 1991 (Horwich & Lyon, 1999). We tried<br />

unsuccessfully to initiate a community-based project that included the Sarstoon-Temash<br />

mangrove forest area in 1989. Then, in 1994, it became a National Park without community<br />

input. The government held an ecotourism conference in 1994 and produced a movie and a<br />

booklet on community ecotourism (Horwich & Lyon, 1999). In 1995, the Association of<br />

Friends of 5 Blues Lake National Park signed a formal co-management agreement with the<br />

Government of Belize. In 1997, the Inuit Circumpolar Conference sponsored a comanagement<br />

workshop in Toledo featuring the Community Baboon Sanctuary as an<br />

example of co-management. Later that year, Community Conservation initiated the process for<br />

a stakeholders workshop for the Sarstoon-Temash National Park (Produciones de la<br />

Hamaca & Community Conservation Consultants, 1998).<br />

Stimulated by that conference, Community Conservation developed a proposal for a<br />

community co-managed park system that was to include Freshwater Creek Forest<br />

Reserve, Five Blues Lake National Park, Gales Point Manatee and Aguacaliente Wildlife<br />

Sanctuary (PACT, 1998). As a result of this project, when the Government of Belize<br />

created the Protected Areas System Plan in 2005 it had a section on community comanagement.<br />

They presented the plan to the conservation community in early 2006<br />

(Government of Belize, 2005). These actions were some that initiated the conservation<br />

contagion. Figure 2 gives a visual representation of a complex network that contributed to<br />

the conservation contagion that resulted throughout the small nation of Belize. Figure 2<br />

demonstrates the complexity of social connections that occurred over the years<br />

contributing to the conservation contagion.<br />

299


300<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Government – GoB - Government of Belize, For - Forestry Department, Fish - Fishery Department,<br />

PACT Coman - Protected Areas Conservation Trust co-management grant, Cmpol – Co-management<br />

policy, Eco Con - Ecotourism Conference,<br />

NGOs – CC – Community Conservation, BAS - Belize Audubon Society, Inuit Conf-Inuit Conference, Sat -<br />

SATIIM, Tast - Taste, Tid - TIDE,<br />

CBOs/PAs - Ag – Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary, BB – Billy Barquedier, BC - Bacalar Chico, CB –<br />

Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, CBS – Community Baboon Sanctuary, Cc – Cay Caulker, CHS –<br />

Community Hickatee Sanctuary, FC – Freshwater Creek Forest Reserve, 5B – 5 Blues Lake National<br />

Park, GG – Gra Gra Lagoon, GP – Gales Point, GS – Gladen Spit, MB - Mayflower Bocwina National<br />

Park, MR –Monkey River, NK -- Noj Kaax Meen Eligio Panti National Park, PC - Paynes Creek, RB - Rio<br />

Blanco National Park, SaC - Sapadilla Cayes, SwC – Swallow Cay, SlC- Slate Creek, SpC - Spanish Creek<br />

Wildlife Sanctuary, ST- Sea Turtle Project, S-T – Sarstoon-Temash National Park.<br />

Fig. 2. Network connections of Community Conservation and their relationships with<br />

community-based organizations and Protected Areas, non-governmental organizations and<br />

government organizations.<br />

4.2 Namibia<br />

In the early 1980s in northern Namibia, wildlife was severely depleted by poaching (Hoole,<br />

2010). At the same time that the Community Baboon Sanctuary was developed in Belize, a<br />

non-governmental organization in Namibia, the Namibian Wildlife Trust, appointed Garth<br />

Owen-Smith, a former government game ranger, to respond to the poaching crisis in the<br />

northern area of the country by collaborating with village headmen who shared concern for<br />

the loss of wildlife (Hoole, 2010; Jones, 2001). Using village contacts from his prior career,<br />

Owen-Smith began to establish relationships with local headmen. Working with the<br />

government conservator, Chris Eyre and in cooperation with village leaders, Owen-Smith


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

instituted informal community game guard protection of wildlife, leading, over time, to<br />

increased population densities of large mammals threatened by poaching (Jones, 2001). In<br />

the mid-1980s, Owen-Smith and anthropologist Margaret Jacobsohn negotiated agreements<br />

with safari operators to pay the community a US$5 fee per tourist visiting the area to view<br />

game (Jones, 2001). In both Belize and Namibia, conservationists initiated their efforts by<br />

responding to environmental problems in discrete, manageable regions, engaging with<br />

stakeholders as allies having common interests and goals to preserve biodiversity. These<br />

associations also addressed resistance and other challenges arising within, between, and<br />

outside of village networks.<br />

By 1989-1991 a community game guard program was firmly established, and Owen-Smith<br />

and Jacobsohn moved on to initiate a second program in northeastern Namibia (Jones,<br />

2001). While projects in Belize had informal support from local politicians, there was no<br />

formal support from government because lands were privately owned by subsistence<br />

farmers. Their practices, especially “milpa” (slash-and-burn) or clear-cutting methods of<br />

land clearance, were often destructive to habitat and organisms inhabiting forests. In<br />

Namibia, before independence, the South African government viewed Owen-Smith’s liaison<br />

with black communities suspiciously, ultimately terminating support for his programs<br />

(Jones, 2001). By 1990, however, the Namibian initiative proved to be on the right side of<br />

history (Westley et al., 2006) when the country gained independence, extending rights over<br />

wildlife to the majority black government, thereby terminating private ownership of land by<br />

white farmers (Hoole, 2010). The post-independence government engaged the nongovernmental<br />

organization, Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation<br />

(IRDNC), formed by Owen-Smith and Jacobsohn, to develop a community-based natural<br />

resource management program (Hoole, 2010). This was similar to the process transpiring in<br />

Belize at approximately the same time.<br />

The pioneering projects in Belize and Namibia had similar trajectories, with conservationists<br />

and small non-governmental organizations acting as catalysts, initiating locally-based<br />

programs and educating villagers. In both cases, through disseminated information initial<br />

projects led to broad-based regional conservation efforts. This seemingly paradoxical role is<br />

the foundation of reliable and replicable tactics and strategies of community conservation,<br />

including features characteristic of Community Conservation’s 9-stage model.<br />

Namibian independence in 1990 removed the obstructionist South African regime, and the<br />

new Namibian government invited Owen-Smith and Jacobsohn to resume and to expand<br />

their work. Namibia’s community-based natural resource management program had been<br />

modeled after other African initiatives such as Zimbabwe’s Communal Areas Program for<br />

Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) and Zambia’s Administrative Management Design for<br />

Game Management Areas program (ADMADE) (Hoole, 2010). Zimbabwe’s conservation<br />

efforts, however, were obstructed by resistance at lower levels of government, a condition<br />

opposite to that in Namibia (Murphree, 2005). With major financial support from World<br />

Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID,<br />

2005) as well as backing from the central government, Namibia’s Communal Conservancy<br />

Program caught on rapidly, exhibiting the conservation contagion seen in Belize and Assam,<br />

<strong>India</strong> (Horwich et al., 2010). By 2009, Namibia was managing 59 registered conservancies<br />

cumulatively, covering 12.2 million hectares (Figure 3; 2009 map from www.nacso.org.na).<br />

Wildlife populations in the northeast conservancy regions increased markedly and money<br />

was generated from eco-projects (NACSO, 2009) with long-term potential for financial<br />

301


302<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

sustainability. While the Namibian case demonstrates that our model for the<br />

implementation of reliable community conservation projects is not the only one capable of<br />

sustained success, the Community Conservation template is explicitly detailed by stages<br />

characteristic of all community-based conservation initiatives. We base this statement upon<br />

our documentation of the methods and outcomes of other programs compared and<br />

contrasted to our own model.<br />

Fig. 3. Map of Namibia’s 59 Community Conservancies in 2009 (redrawn from 2009 map on<br />

www.nacso.org.na).<br />

4.3 Assam, <strong>India</strong><br />

The Golden Langur Conservation Project was initiated in 1998 to protect the Manas<br />

Biosphere Reserve and the golden langur (Trachypithecus geei), a folivorous monkey. Forests<br />

of the Manas Biosphere Reserve have been threatened by illegal logging since the early<br />

1990s, and, in the last 15 years, approximately one third to one half of the three reserve<br />

forests (~200,000 ha) making up the reserve (Ripu, Chirrang, and Manas), were deforested<br />

by clear-cutting (Bose & Horwich, unpublished data). Based on transect surveys, including<br />

interviews with residents in and near the reserves, these three reserve forests, a group of<br />

southern isolated reserve forests, and the Royal Manas Sanctuary on Bhutan’s northern<br />

border are presently the primary range of the golden langur. Understanding the potential of<br />

conservation contagion to create regional change, Community Conservation included local<br />

communities, non-governmental organizations, and agencies of the governing body of<br />

Assam in planning meetings and seminars to discuss the conservation project. While the<br />

Assam Forestry Department showed some interest in the effort, it was not until a new tribal<br />

government, the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), was formed in 2004, that community<br />

conservation was embraced, leading rapidly to the contagious spread of support for our<br />

proposals noted earlier, ultimately attracting crowds of 20,000 to 35,000 people (Figure 4) to<br />

our informational programs (Horwich et al., 2010).


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Fig. 4. Crowd Attending the Manas Biosphere Celebration at Ultapani<br />

An important aspect of the Assam project is the manner in which a second tier of catalysis<br />

arose from activities of community-based organizations and non-governmental<br />

organizations. In 2006, Forest Protection Forces were created within the Manas Biosphere<br />

Reserve with support from the Bodoland Territorial Council. Subsequently, conservation<br />

contagion gained momentum, culminating in cooperative management by 14 community<br />

groups forming the Unified Forest Conservation Network of Bodoland, supported by local<br />

and governmental networks (Horwich and Bose, personal observation). A schematic<br />

representation of connections between the three forests making up the reserve is presented<br />

in Figure 5. The lower circular configuration representing the Unified Forest Conservation<br />

Network of Bodoland that protects the Biosphere mimics the military squad network<br />

topology of Christakis and Fowler (2009). This ring network topology experimentally was<br />

shown to facilitate problem solving (Christakis & Fowler, 2009).<br />

Similarly, contagion occurred around the Kakoijana Reserve Forest where community<br />

members inhabiting or proximal to the reserve forest, housing a small golden langur<br />

population, were attracted to the conservation project. Today, by contagious processes, 28<br />

communities surrounding Kakoijana Reserve Forest (Figure 6) have created two federations<br />

(Nature Guard, Green Conservation Federation) to protect the 17km 2 reserve (Bose &<br />

Horwich, personal observation). These are represented by the two upper, left spheres in<br />

Figure 5. Most importantly, these community protection efforts resulted in an increased<br />

<strong>India</strong>n golden langur population from 1500 to almost 5600 langurs (Figure 7). The Kakoijana<br />

Reserve Forest increased its forest from 5% to 70-80% canopy (Figure 8) accompanied by an<br />

increase of golden langurs from less than 100 to over 500 langurs (Horwich et al., 2010;<br />

Horwich et al., 2011, Bose and Horwich unpublished data).<br />

303


304<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Government: As – Assam Forest Department, B – Bodoland Territorial Council<br />

NGOs: Aa – Aaranyak, C – Community Conservation, G – Green Heart Nature Club, N – Natures Foster,<br />

CBOs (black spheres): Biodiversity Conservation Society, Green Forest Conservation (larger black<br />

sphere), Manas Agrang Society, Manas Bhuyapara Conservation and Ecotourism Society, Manas<br />

Maozigendri Ecotourism Society, Manas Souci Khongar Ecotourism Society, New Horizon, Panbari<br />

Manas National Park Protection and Ecotourism Socierty, Raigajli Ecotourism and Social Welfare<br />

Society, Swarnkwr Mithinga Onsai Afut and four other unnamed community organizations.<br />

CBOs around Kakoijana Reserve Forests (black spheres upper left) Green Conservation Federation,<br />

Nature Guard<br />

Fig. 5. Network Connections Established by the Golden Langur Conservation Project in<br />

Assam, <strong>India</strong> Between Government, Non-Government and Community Organizations.


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Fig. 6. Map of Kakoijana Reserve Forest surrounded by 28 villages composing the Green<br />

Conservation Federation and Nature Guard that protect the reserve forest<br />

Fig. 7. Graph of <strong>India</strong>n Golden Langur Population estimates indicating population increase<br />

following initiation of the Golden Langur Conservation Project (data from Gee, 1964 for<br />

1960; Srivastava, et al. 2001 for 1997; Choudhury, 2002 for 2000; Ghosh, 2008a & b for 2008;<br />

Anonymous, 2009, Bose, 2007, 2008 (unpublished data), Ghosh, 2008a for 2009)<br />

305


306<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Fig. 8. Vegetation maps of Kakoijana Reserve Forest in 1996 and 2008 showing an increase in<br />

canopy cover from 5% to 70% as a result of community reforestation and protection.


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

In the Assam project, local villagers were trained as community organizers, community<br />

researchers, and community para-veterinarians (Figure 9). Through expansion of many<br />

programs and capacity-building, the project has influenced conservation efforts at broader<br />

regional scales, similar to the cases described for Belize and Namibia.<br />

Fig. 9. Veterinarian Sarma training para-veterinarians near Kakoijana Reserve Forest<br />

For example, one trained community organizer initiated self-help groups coordinating<br />

environmental awareness sessions around Manas National Park for the Pygmy Hog (Porcula<br />

salvania) Project (Bose and Horwich, personal observation). He is also organizing<br />

communities for the Assam Haathi Project whose goal is to mediate human-elephant<br />

conflict along the southern basin of the Brahmaputra River in Golpara District. Another<br />

local conservationist, trained in cutting-edge primate census methods by Community<br />

Conservation personnel, worked with the Tripura State Forest Department to census Phayre’s<br />

langurs (Trachypithecus phayrei), leaf-eating monkeys related to golden langurs. Members of<br />

communities in these areas gained capacity and experience and were able to enhance their<br />

employability as semi-professional conservationists, disseminating project goals and<br />

procedures throughout the region. They currently perform a role similar to trained parataxonomists<br />

in Papua New Guinea, in Guyana, and elsewhere (see Basset et al., 2000). In<br />

other locales, community members have been trained by a veterinarian as paraveterinarians<br />

(Figure 9), similar to bare-foot doctors supporting the Hen Can Change a Man<br />

Program organized to increase the income of villagers engaged in poultry husbandry<br />

around the Kakoijana Reserve Forest. These examples of effective educational initiatives<br />

reinforce our suggestion that all community-based conservation programs, ceteris paribus,<br />

are characterized by features similar to our 9-stage model because, due to psychological,<br />

economic, political, social and other comparable constraints, there are a restricted number of<br />

tactics and strategies likely to lead to sustained success. Training and capacity-building for<br />

both individuals and non-governmental organizations, then, have been integral and critical<br />

parts of expansion of community conservation programs on a range of fronts. Following the<br />

definition of catalysis presented above, energy inputs required to activate and effect initial<br />

stages of community-based conservation were decreased as a result of increased efficiency<br />

307


308<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

resulting from skill- and evidence-based organization. The broad regional success in Assam<br />

and elsewhere is dependent upon community conservation contagion traceable back to a<br />

modest, small-scale starting point in local areas. Our model, then, schematizes the trajectory<br />

of successful bottom-up conservation programs, creating stable “horizontal networks”<br />

capable of developing productive associations and activities with components of “vertical<br />

networks” (Berkes, 2004).<br />

5. Lessons learned from practice<br />

There is a current dearth of articles comparing and contrasting community-based<br />

conservation, community conservation, collaborative management, ICDPs, etc. These terms<br />

have, effectively, become buzz-words with biologists and sociologists referring to "new<br />

conservation" models incorporating community-based conservation practices. With so many<br />

different approaches, it has become difficult to know what works best and what doesn’t.<br />

First hand practical experience with 23 small on-going community conservation projects<br />

over the past 26 years have given us insights about what factors are most critical for<br />

achieving program success (Table 1).<br />

Rural communities are a major resource for a new breed of conservationists. Since they live<br />

where the highest concentration of natural resources exists, can easily exploit them with<br />

traditional practices, have additional knowledge about their habitats and people, and are<br />

experts in their own right, mainstream conservationists must create incentives for<br />

indigenous and other local people in order that their talents, knowledge, expectations,<br />

desires, and persistence can be utilized for their own benefit and that of the forests and<br />

wildlife. Conservationists can use existing rural institutions or can help rural people create<br />

new institutions to deal with modern problems (Agrawal and Gibson, 1999).<br />

To be most effective, practitioners need to be catalysts of community conservation, helping<br />

community-based organizations to form in local communities, monitoring them, building<br />

capacity and re-catalyzing them when needed. When initiating a community conservation<br />

project, a well-crafted proposal may have major power to interest community members,<br />

government officials, donors, and other stakeholders to become involved. Enlisting a<br />

support coordinator and seed money are important to get a young project started and to<br />

help a fledgling community-based organization.<br />

Seed money and money for simple project maintenance is essential. Looking for a simple<br />

mechanism for partial financial sustainability is very difficult, but, when found, adds a great<br />

deal toward continuity and longevity, preventing community discouragement. Using a<br />

guiding, entrance, or membership fee for protected areas can create a minimal budget to<br />

keep the project going. Community ecotourism, while a double-edged sword, can provide<br />

potential in this direction.<br />

While financial sustainability is to be strived for, project continuity and longevity depend on<br />

creating social incentives. Properly equipped volunteers are very important to keep<br />

incentives going. Discontinuity of funds or other incentives discourages community<br />

members. Although projects may pass through ups and downs, if the original incentives<br />

were good, there is a recycling effect; a project is only a failure if it totally disappears.<br />

Establishing model projects is extremely important to encourage other projects and can have<br />

a regional effect. A replication of techniques from one project to another helps to propagate<br />

ideas and models.


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Connection to land is important to rural residents and ownership contributes greatly to this.<br />

Thus, historical land tenure may be problematic or can be a source for positive conservation<br />

alternatives. While private landowners can make important contributions, encouraging<br />

communal and tribal or clan ownership, where in place, has a greater relevance for project<br />

longevity and long-term environmental protection, especially if there is a strong formal or<br />

informal institution in place. Since private landownership has its limitations, formal land<br />

protection mechanisms for private lands can create a long-lasting effect. There is a difference<br />

between land ownership and management and community groups can achieve some<br />

benefits from management alone. Land use planning provides an important vision for<br />

future conservation and protection.<br />

While governments are often slow to move, may be corrupt, or can hamper a project, there<br />

is a great need for balanced community-government communication. Too much<br />

government reduces community initiative. However, effective, strong laws can provide<br />

strong legal land protection. Additionally, once government sees the advantage to involving<br />

communities, their tactical and financial support can provide project sustainability. Comanagement<br />

of protected areas can thus be an important balanced conservation solution.<br />

Non-governmental organizations have an important role (Agrawal & Gibson, 1999) as<br />

intermediaries and community trainers and educators. They can provide an initial open<br />

communicatory link between communities and government. Often, they can provide<br />

expertise and motivation that governments cannot. Non-governmental organizations can<br />

provide networking to connect communities to the resources they need to develop a<br />

stronger community-based organization. In any effective system that involves communities,<br />

non-governmental organizations, and government, there is a need to strengthen all partners,<br />

especially the weaker ones.<br />

6. Policy implications for the future<br />

Comprehensive, multi-scale, and resilient policies are required to respond effectively to<br />

social, political, and economic networks facilitating successful catalytic incidents and the<br />

emergence of conservation contagion. In this chapter, we have documented a resilient<br />

community-based model whose successes have resulted from the expansion of existing<br />

ground-level networks into a broader horizontal matrix by capitalizing on catalytic events<br />

and subsequent contagious diffusion. These tactics and strategies operate along with<br />

indigenous and other local values, beliefs, folkways, resource use, and political structures as<br />

well as social, cultural, and economic activities in order to capitalize on opportunities to<br />

build complex horizontal networks (see Berkes, 2004, Christakis and Fowler, 2009). In these<br />

cases, we have observed that a critical mass of complexity (e.g., by increasing interindividual<br />

and multi-scale interactions) may lead to a threshold response at which a tipping<br />

point is reached, leading from one state of relative equilibrium to another (Gladwell, 2002).<br />

These non-linear events may have negative as well as positive outcomes from the<br />

perspective of conservation goals and objectives. Indeed, some studies suggest that<br />

increased complexity may lead some community members to resist or abandon active<br />

engagement with conservation initiatives (see Hoare and du Toit 1999 in Berkes, 2004), a<br />

dynamic state of affairs providing challenges to community-based organizations but capable<br />

of being addressed by components of our model applied to community-based organization<br />

programs by trained facilitators.<br />

309


310<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Community-based initiatives and their practitioners deliver specialized, reliable tactics and<br />

strategies to indigenous and other local communities for empowerment of community<br />

networks and, ultimately, transfer of power to these entities. Paramount to success is<br />

remembering that indigenous and other local communities are necessary components for<br />

solutions to the worldwide biodiversity crisis. We have demonstrated that application of our<br />

model and treating indigenous and other stakeholders with consistent and reliable respect<br />

and humility, valuing their folkways, habits, and cultures, their knowledge, leadership<br />

skills, and significant expertise without patronizing attitudes and behaviors, a majority of<br />

local stakeholders become willing and active participants in conservation programs (see<br />

Persha et al., 2011). If these factors are obtained, trusting, enduring relationships between<br />

horizontal and vertical networks can be built having the potential to establish multi-scale,<br />

multidimensional, complex, and dynamic associations, incorporating indigenous and other<br />

local people as co-conservationists (Haldane &May, 2011; Persha et al., 2011). In addition to<br />

consolidating horizontal and vertical networks, Community Conservation’s mission and the<br />

successful implementation of our 9-stage model that we extend to other community-based<br />

organizations, has promoted the success of our programs by providing incentives, fostering<br />

pride, advancing program self-sufficiency, and effecting sustainable project ownership.<br />

Our case studies demonstrate applications of the 9-stage paradigm that have influenced<br />

non-governmental organizations and/or central governments to adopt community-based<br />

conservation as policy, an outcome with the potential to impact conventional top-down<br />

environmental procedures linking horizontal with vertical networks. It is important to<br />

emphasize that successful implementation of our strategies depends upon careful,<br />

calculated planning resulting from the training and expertise of Community Conservation<br />

personnel. Equally important are the social and other skills, attendant traits, and motivation<br />

of indigenous leaders and other local individuals providing the initial commitment and<br />

impetus for successful implementation of our model and, later, cooperatively designed<br />

plans. Further, the flexibility and resilience of our 9-stage paradigm permits accommodation<br />

and adjustment to a range of local conditions, contingencies best evaluated stage by stage<br />

throughout the dynamic process of the multi-stage implementation of programs.<br />

An example of the flexibility and resilience of our 9-stage plan involves the different<br />

contexts and challenges encountered when community members of low socioeconomic rank<br />

prove, initially, to be the most committed to implementation of conservation projects. In our<br />

experience, when the principal innovators and drivers of change in a target community are<br />

of relatively low socioeconomic or other status compared to, for example, group leaders, a<br />

longer period of time is required for the broader community and region to absorb, integrate,<br />

and respond to new ideas and ultimate project success. The cases we describe emphasize the<br />

need to adopt a flexible, resilient, and holistic systems perspective including social,<br />

economic, and political components of values and practices of indigenous and other local<br />

agents’ relationships to their environment given the short-, mid- and long-range goals and<br />

objectives.<br />

Currently, indigenous or other local people with lower socioeconomic status, including<br />

some men, most women, and youth, are assuming key roles in Community Conservation’s<br />

community-based conservation projects. Large international non-governmental<br />

organizations may see the potential of using a catalyst method by adopting our 9-stage<br />

paradigm as a component of their conservation policy. Incorporating plans such as


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Community Conservation’s tactics and strategies would permit non-governmental<br />

organizations, central governments, and other entities to modify their methods, developing<br />

paradigms representative of their own circumstances and complying with the goals,<br />

objectives, and philosophies of their particular organizations. For example, World Wildlife<br />

Fund began innovative community conservation projects in southern Madagascar and<br />

Namibia. Conservation International is supporting the Tree Kangaroo Conservation in<br />

Papua New Guinea (Ancrenaz et al., 2007). The Nature Conservancy has shown innovative<br />

community projects in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands (Mayer and Brown,<br />

2007). Similarly, the Wildlife Conservation Society works with local communities to protect<br />

the critically endangered Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) limited to a restricted area<br />

along the Nigerian-Cameroon border (Nicholas et al., 2010). Successes can be documented;<br />

however, community conservation projects may not always be sufficiently comprehensive,<br />

ambitious, or efficient in time and energy to persuade non-governmental organizations with<br />

large budgets to invest in relatively small-scale conservation activities (Brockington et al.,<br />

2008). Furthermore, in our experience, large-scale non-governmental organizations rarely<br />

advertise their small community conservation accomplishments, and, if this policy were<br />

reversed, community-based conservation would likely be poised to gain a significant degree<br />

of legitimacy with non-governmental organizations and other entities in vertical networks.<br />

Attempts to evaluate the outputs and successes of historical policies and practices of<br />

protective programs and the field of conservation biology suggest that these entities lag<br />

behind most other policy fields because of their resistance to and slow incorporation of<br />

participatory philosophy and models (Ferraro & Pattanayak, 2006; also see Milner-Gulland<br />

et al., 2010). Yet there is growing recent data that show the effects of community and<br />

indigenous projects in reducing deforestation. Recent studies by Porter-Bollard et al. (2011),<br />

comparing 40 tropical protected areas to 33 community managed forests, indicated that the<br />

community managed forests showed lower and less variable annual deforestation than the<br />

protected areas. Soares-Filho et al. (2010), focusing on Brazil’s recent push to reduce<br />

Amazonian deforestation by expanding the Amazon protected area network of 1.9 million<br />

km2, showed a generalized inhibitory effect on deforestation in protected areas which<br />

would greatly reduce carbon emissions which in turn would effect climate change.<br />

However, they used a broad definition of protected areas. Looking closer at these 595<br />

protected areas, only 90 or 15% were in the strictly protected category used by Porter-<br />

Bollard et al. (2011) while 494 or 83% were in the sustainable use (176) and indigenous lands<br />

(318) categories. Thus the positive results are mainly due to sustained use and indigenous<br />

lands, indicating the importance of community conservation.<br />

New conservation policies incorporate and embrace community conservation as one<br />

approach to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation, necessitating involvement and active<br />

participation by horizontal networks, including community and other stakeholder entities,<br />

community-based organizations, regional and national agencies, central governments, nongovernmental<br />

organizations, conservation biologists, and other conservation practitioners<br />

(e.g., forest guards and rangers; scientists conducting research in habitat countries and<br />

hotspots) and stakeholders. Connecting horizontal and vertical networks among<br />

conservation entities has the potential to increase network diversity, scale, and resilience,<br />

maximizing likelihoods of success of conservation programs. Such connectivity also has the<br />

potential to compensate for limitations of agents and entities in both horizontal and vertical<br />

networks since bottom-up entities have generally lacked the resources to invest in the<br />

311


312<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

creation, management, and sustainability of global organizations or in sustaining these<br />

networks if and when established. Higher-order, protectionist networks with “fortress<br />

conservation” policies have traditionally been averse to incorporating the interests, values,<br />

and bodies of indigenous and other local agents and units (informal and formal) into the<br />

goals and objectives of their mission statements and programs. This state of affairs has been<br />

maintained in large part because the morality, ethics, beliefs, attitudes, and philosophy of<br />

local people’s relationships to their natural resources has conflicted with those of vertical<br />

networks’ historical prioritization of preservation over sustainable use of forests,<br />

waterways, etc. (Berkes, 2004). When multi-level networks cooperate and establish metanetworks<br />

designed to resolve differences of vision and to consolidate communication<br />

networks and integrated representation of all stakeholders, differences and potential<br />

conflicts can be minimized through a multi-scale and multidimensional system sensitive to<br />

the interests and objectives of all network units over time and space.<br />

7. Acknowledgements<br />

We thank all of the community members and non-governmental organizations from the<br />

countries in which we worked, especially Belize and <strong>India</strong>. They are the heroes and doers.<br />

We are only the catalysts. We especially acknowledge the input and expertise of Dr. Colin,<br />

Jesse, and the late Fallett Young in Belize, whose support and encouragement were critical<br />

as we implemented our first international project. Our gratitude is also extended to Sadahib<br />

Senn, Raju Das and other members of Nature’s Foster, the late Rajen Islari, and others from<br />

Green Forest Conservation, Bablu Dey and others from Green Heart Nature Club, Mahesh<br />

Moshahary and others from New Horizon, Firoz Ahmed and Aaranyak, and the members<br />

of the Biodiversity Conservation Society, the Raigajli Ecotourism and Social Welfare Society,<br />

the Panbari Manas National Park Protection and Ecotourism Society, the Swarnkwr<br />

Mithinga Onsai Afut, the Manas Maozigendri Ecotourism Society, Manas Bhuyapara<br />

Conservation and Ecotourism Society, the Manas Souchi Khongkar Ecotourism Society, the<br />

Manas Agrang Society, the Green Conservation Federation, and the Nature Guard of<br />

Chiponshila for making the Golden Langur Conservation Project a major success. We also<br />

are grateful to Minister of the <strong>Environment</strong> Kampa Borgoyari and the Bodoland Territorial<br />

Council for their support. The Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation, Conservation<br />

International, Primate Conservation, Inc., World Wildlife Fund, and the US Fish & Wildlife<br />

Service provided financial support, and we appreciate the generosity of these organizations.<br />

Thanks, also, to Ashley Morga for critiquing the manuscript.<br />

8. References<br />

Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of<br />

community in natural resource conservation. World Development, Vol.27, pp. 629-<br />

649, ISSN 0305-750X<br />

Allendorf, T. (2007). Residents’ attitudes toward three protected areas in southwestern<br />

Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol.16, pp. 2087-2102, ISSN 0960-3115<br />

Ancrenaz, M.; Dabek, L., & O’Neill, S. (2007). The costs of exclusion: recognizing a role for<br />

local communities in biodiversity conservation. PloS Biology, Vol.5, No.11, pp. 2443-<br />

2448, ISSN1544-9173


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Anonymous. (2009). Comprehensive census reveals 4,231 golden langurs. In: Assam Tribune<br />

April 13 , 2009, Available from:<br />

<br />

accessed 12/27/09<br />

Anonymous. (2011). <strong>India</strong> Tiger Estimate 2010. Ministry of <strong>Environment</strong> and Forests,<br />

Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

Ariely, D. (2010). The Upside of Irrationality. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, , ISBN 978-<br />

006-1995-03-3<br />

Arnstein, S.A. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of<br />

Planners ,Vol.35, pp. 216-224, ISSN 0002-8991<br />

Balmford, A., & Whitten, T. (2003). Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how<br />

could the costs be met? Oryx, Vol.37, pp. 238-250, ISSN 0030-6053<br />

Barrow, E. (1996). Frameworks for community participation. 1996 Pan Africa Symposium on<br />

Sustainable Use of Natural Resources and Community Participation. Harare, IUCN,<br />

ISBN 079-7419-07-1<br />

Basset, Y.; Novotny, V., Miller, S.E., & Pyle, R. (2000). Quantifying biodiversity: experience<br />

with parataxonomists and digital photography in Papua New Guinea and Guyana.<br />

Bioscience, Vol.50, No.10, pp. 899-908, ISSN 0006-3568<br />

Belsky, J. M. (2000). The meaning of the manatee: an examination of community-based<br />

ecotourism discourse and practice in Gales Point, Belize. In: People, Plants and<br />

Justice, C. Zerner (Ed.), pp.(285-308), Columbia University Press, ISBN 023-1108-10-<br />

9, New York<br />

Belsky, J.M. (1999). Misrepresenting communities: the politics of community-based rural<br />

ecotourism in Gales Point Manatee, Belize. Rural Sociology, Vol.64, pp. 641-666,<br />

ISSN 0036-0112<br />

Berkes, F. (1994). Co-management: bridging the two solitudes. Northern Perspectives, Vol.22,<br />

pp. 18-20, ISSN 0380-5522<br />

Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, Vol.18,<br />

pp. 621-630, ISSN 0888-8892<br />

Bernstein, S.E. (2005). Training to Develop Community-based Co-management Capacity in Belize.<br />

M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.<br />

Bevis, J. & Bevis, M. (1991). Slate Creek Preserve. Unpublished manuscript.<br />

Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996). Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the<br />

Approach to the Context. International Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland<br />

Borrini-Feyerabend, G..; Pimbert, M., Taghi Farvar, J.C., Kothari, A., & Renard, Y. (2004).<br />

Sharing Power. Learning by Doing in Co-management of Natural Resources Throughout<br />

the World. International Institute for <strong>Environment</strong> and Development (IIED) and<br />

IUCN, ISBN 184-3694-44-1, Cenesta, Tehran.<br />

Brandon, K.; Redford, K.H., & Sanderson, S.E. (Eds.). (1998). Parks in Peril: People, Politics and<br />

Protected Areas. Island Press/The Nature Conservancy, ISBN 155-9636-07-6,<br />

Washington D.C.<br />

Brechin, S.R.; Wilshusen, P.R., Fortwangler, C.L.,& West, P.C. (2002). Reinventing a square<br />

wheel: a critique of the new protectionist paradigm in international biodiversity<br />

conservation. Society and Natural Resources, Vol.15, pp. 41-64, ISSN 0894-1920<br />

Broad, J. (1994). The poor and the environment: friends or foes? World Development, Vol.22,<br />

pp. 811-822, ISSN 0305-750X.<br />

313


314<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Brockington, D.; Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature Unbound. Earthscan, ISBN 978-1-84407-<br />

440-2, London.<br />

Brooks, T.M.; Mittermeier, R.A., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gerlack, J., Hoffman, M., Lamoreux,<br />

J.F., Mittermeier, C.G., Pilgim, J.D., & Rodrigues, A.S.L. (2006). Global biodiversity<br />

conservation priorities. Science ,Vol.313, pp. 58-61, ISSN 0036-8075<br />

Brosius, P.; Tsing, A.L., & Zerner, C. (1998). Representing communities: histories and politics<br />

of community-based natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources,<br />

Vol.11, pp. 157-168, ISSN 0899-1920<br />

Caddy, E.; Ch'oc, G., Paul, S. (2000). The Sarstoon-Temash Institute of Indigenous<br />

Management: a grassroots initiative for social equity and sustainable development.<br />

In: MS presented at the IUCN World Congress, Amman, Jordan, Oct 10.<br />

Catzim, A. (2002). Project Systematization Main Report. PACT/GEF/UNDP The Community Comanaged<br />

Parks System Project 1999-2002, PACT, Belmopan.<br />

Choudhury, A. (2002). Golden langur Trachypithecus geei threatened by habitat<br />

fragmentation. Zoo’s Print Journal, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 699-703<br />

Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Networks and<br />

How They Shape Our Lives. Little, Brown and Company, ISBN 978-0-326-03614-6,<br />

New York<br />

Davey, A. G. (1998). National System Planning for Protected Areas, IUCN, ISBN 283-1703-99-9,<br />

Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />

Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation Refugees. MIT Press, ISBN 978- 0-26201-261-4, Cambridge,<br />

Massachusetts<br />

Dupuis, E.M. & Vandergeest, P. (Eds.). (1996). Creating the Countryside: the Politics of Rural<br />

and environmental Discourse, Temple University Press, ISBN 156-6393-60-4,<br />

Philadelphia<br />

Feeny, D.; Berkes, F., McCay, B.J. & Acheson, J.M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons:<br />

twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, Vol.18, pp. 1-19, ISSN 0300-7839<br />

Ferraro, P.J. & Pattanayak, S.K. (2006). Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation<br />

of Biodiversity Conservation Investments, PLoS Biology, Vol.4, No.4, e105.<br />

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105, ISSN 1544-9173<br />

Gadgil, M. & Guha, R. (1993). This Fissured Land: an Ecological History of <strong>India</strong>, University of<br />

California Press, ISBN 052-0076-21-4, Berkeley, California<br />

Gee, E. P. (1964). The Wildlife of <strong>India</strong>, Collins, London.<br />

Gezon, L. (1997). Institutional Structure and the Effectiveness of Integrated Conservation<br />

and Development Projects: Case Study from Madagascar, Human Organization,<br />

Vol.56, No.4, pp. 462-470, ISSN 0018-7259<br />

Ghosh, S. (2008a). Report on Population Estimation of Golden Langur (Southern Population) in<br />

Chakrashila Wildlife Sanctuary and Reserve Forests Under Kokrajhar, Dhubri and<br />

Bongaigaon Districts of Assam, Report to the Assam Forest Department, Guwahati,<br />

Assam<br />

Ghosh, S. (2008b). Report of Wild Elephant (Elephas maximus) Population Estimation in Bodoland<br />

Territorial Council (20 th-26 th Feb 2008), Report to the Assam Forest Department,<br />

Guwahati, Assam<br />

Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, Little,<br />

Brown and Company, ISBN 031-6316-96-2, New York.


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Government of Belize. (2005). The Belize National Protected Areas System Plan. Ministry of<br />

Natural Resources and the <strong>Environment</strong>, Belmopan, Belize<br />

Government of Belize. (1998). Belize’s Interim National Report. Submitted to The Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity. Ministry of Natural Resources, Belmopan, Belize<br />

Guha, R. (1989). The Unquiet Woods, Oxford University Press, ISBN 052-0222-35-0, Delhi<br />

Haldane, A.G., & May, R.M. (2011). Systematic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, Vol.469,<br />

pp. 351-355, ISSN 0028-0836<br />

Ham, S. M.; Sutherland, D.S., & Meganck, R.A. (1993). Applying environmental<br />

interpretation in protected areas of developing countries: problems in exporting a<br />

US model, <strong>Environment</strong>al Conservation, Vol.20, pp. 232-242, ISSN 0376-8929<br />

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons, Science, Vol.162, pp. 1243-1248, ISSN 0036-<br />

8075<br />

Hoole, A.F. (2010). Place – power –prognosis: community-based conservation, partnerships<br />

and ecotourism enterprise in Namibia. Inernational Journal of the Commons, Vol.4,<br />

No.1, pp. 78-99, ISSN 1875-0281<br />

Horwich, R. H. & Lyon, J. (1988). Experimental Technique for the conservation of private<br />

lands. Journal of Medical Primatology, Vol.17, pp. 169-176, ISSN 0047-2565<br />

Horwich, R. H. (1990a). How to develop a community sanctuary - an experimental approach<br />

to the conservation of private lands, Oryx, Vol.24, pp. 95-102, ISSN 0030-6053<br />

Horwich, R.H. & Lyon, J. (1995). Multilevel conservation and education at the Community<br />

Baboon Sanctuary, Belize. In: Conserving Wildlife: International Education and<br />

Communication Approaches, Jacobson, S.K., (Ed.), pp. (235-253), Columbia University<br />

Press, ISBN 023-1079-67-2, New York<br />

Horwich, R.H. & Lyon, J. (1998). Community development as a conservation strategy: the<br />

Community Baboon Sanctuary and Gales Point Manatee projects compared, In:<br />

Timber, Tourists, and Temples: Conservation and Development in the Maya Forests of<br />

Belize, Guatemala and Mexico, R.B. Primack, D.H. Bray, A. Galetti, A. & I. Ponciana,<br />

(Eds.), pp. (343-364), Island Press, ISBN 1-55963-541-X, Washington DC<br />

Horwich, R.H. & Lyon, J. (1999). Rural ecotourism as a conservation tool. In: Development of<br />

Tourism in Critical <strong>Environment</strong>, T.V. Singh & S. Singh (Eds.), pp. (102-119),<br />

Cognizant Communication Corporation, ISBN 1-882345-19-3, New York<br />

Horwich, R.H. & Lyon, J. (2007). Community conservation: practitioners’ answer to critics.<br />

Oryx, Vol.41, No.3, pp. 376-385, ISSN 0030-6053<br />

Horwich, R.H. (1990b). A Biosphere Reserve for Toledo District. Unpublished manuscript.<br />

Horwich, R.H. (1998). Effective solutions for howler conservation, International Journal of<br />

Primatology, Vol.19, pp. 579-598, ISSN 0164-0291<br />

Horwich, R.H. (2005). Communities saving Wisconsin birds: north and south. Passenger<br />

Pigeon, Vol.67, pp. 85-98, ISSN 0031-2703<br />

Horwich, R.H., Lyon, J. & Bernstein, S.E. (2004). An evaluation tool for internal and external<br />

assessments of community-based conservation projects, Unpublished manuscript<br />

Horwich, R.H.; Islari, R., Bose, A., Dey, B., Moshahary, M., Dey, N.K., Das, R. & Lyon, J.<br />

(2010). Community Protection of the the Manas Biosphere Reserve in Assam, <strong>India</strong><br />

and the endangered golden Langur (Trachypithecus geei). Oryx, Vol.44, No. 2, pp.<br />

252-260, ISSN 0030-6053<br />

Horwich, R.H.; Lyon, J., & Bose, A. (2011). What Belize can teach us about grassroots<br />

conservation. Solutions, May-June, pp. 51-58, ISSN 2154-0896<br />

315


316<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Horwich, R.H.; Murray, D., Saqui, E., Lyon, J. & Godfrey, G. (1993). Ecotourism and<br />

community development : A view from Belize. In: Ecotourism : A Guide For Planners<br />

and Managers, K. Lindberg. & D. E. Hawkins,(Eds.), pp.(152-168), The Ecotourism<br />

Society, ISBN 096-3633-10-4, North Bennington, Vermont<br />

Hutton, J.; Adams, W.M., & Murombedzi, J.C. (2005). Back to the barriers? Changing<br />

narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Developmental Studies NUPI, No.2,<br />

pp. 341-370<br />

Inamdar, A.; de Jode, H., Lindsay, K. & Cobb, S. (1999). Capitalizing on nature: protected<br />

area management. Science, Vol.283, pp. 1856-1857, ISSN 0036-8075<br />

IUCN, (2003). Policy Matters, Vol.12<br />

Johnson, M. (1992). Lore: Capturing Traditional <strong>Environment</strong>al Knowledge. International<br />

Development Research Centre, ISBN 088-9366-44-6, Ottawa, Ontario<br />

Jones, B. (2001). The evolution of community-based approach to wildlife management at<br />

Kunene, Namibia. In: African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of<br />

Community Conservation, D. Hulme & M. Murphree (Eds.), pp. (38-58), James<br />

Currey, Ltd., ISBN 032-5070-60-1, Oxford<br />

Kiss, A. (2004). Making biodiversity conservation a land-use priority. In: Getting Biodiversity<br />

Projects to Work, T.O. McShane & M.P.Wells (Eds.), pp. (98-123). Columbia<br />

University Press, ISBN 023-1127-64-2, New York<br />

Kramer, R.; van Schaik, C., & Johnson, J. (Eds.) (1997). Last Stand: Protected Areas and the<br />

Defense of Tropical Biodiversity, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-509554-5, New<br />

York<br />

Lyon, J., & Horwich, R.H. (1996). Modification of tropical forest patches for wildlife<br />

protection and community conservation in Belize, In: Forest Patches in Tropical<br />

landscapes, J. Schelhas & R. Greenberg (Eds.), pp. (205-230), Island Press, ISBN 155-<br />

9634-25-1, Washington, D.C.<br />

Mayer, E., Brown, S. (2007). Community Resource Management at the Arnavons, Accessed<br />

November 25, 2007, Available from:<br />

<br />

McGill, J.N.A. (1994). Special Development Areas. Consultancy Report No. 13, The Forest<br />

Planning and Management Project, Ministry of Natural Resources, Belmopan,<br />

Belize.<br />

McShane, T.O. & Newby, S.A. (2004). Expecting the unattainable: the assumptions behind<br />

ICDPs, In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, T.O. McShane & M.P. Wells (Eds.),<br />

pp. (49-74), Columbia University Press, ISBN 023-1127-64-2, New York<br />

McShane, T.O., Wells, M.P. (Eds.). (2004). Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, Columbia<br />

University Press, ISBN 023-1127-64-2, New York<br />

Meerman, J.C. (2005). Belize Protected Areas Policy and System Plan: Result 2: Protected Area<br />

System Assessment & Analysis PUBLIC DRAFT. Unpublished Report to the Protected<br />

Areas Systems Plan Office.<br />

Milner-Gulland, E.J.; Fisher, M., Browne, S., Redford, K.H., Spencer, M. & Sutherland, W.J.<br />

(2010). Do we need to develop a more relevant conservation literature? Oryx,<br />

Vol.44, pp.1-2, ISSN 0030-6053<br />

Murphree, M.W. (2005). Congruent objectives, competing interests, and strategic<br />

compromise: concept and process in the evolution of Zimbabwe’s CAMPFIRE,<br />

1984-1996, In: Communities and Conservation: History and Politics of Community-Based


Preserving Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Catalyzing Conservation Contagion<br />

Management, J.P. Brosius, A.L. Tsing & C. Zerner, (Eds.), pp. (105-147), Altamira<br />

Press, ISBN 075-9105-05-7, New York<br />

NACSO. (2009). Namibia’s communal conservancies: a review of progress 2008, NACSO,<br />

Windhoek.<br />

Nicholas, A.; Warren, Y., Bila, S., Ekinde, A., Ikfuingei, R. & Tampie, R. (2010). Successes in<br />

community-based monitoring of Cross River gorillas (Gorilla gorilla diehli) in<br />

Cameroon. African Primates, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 55-60, ISSN 1093-8966<br />

Oates, J.F. (1999). Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies Are Failing in<br />

West Africa. University of California Press, ISBN 052-0217-82-9, Berkeley<br />

PACT. (1998). Creating a Co-managed Protected Areas System in Belize: A Plan for Joint<br />

Stewardship Between Government and Community. Unpublished Manuscript<br />

Pathak, N.; Bhatt, S., Tasneem, B., Kothari, A., & Borrini-Feyerbend, G. (2004). Community<br />

Conservation Areas. A Bold Frontier for Conservation. TILCEPA, IUCN, CENESTA,<br />

CMWG, and WAMIP, ISBN Tehran.<br />

Persha L.; Agrawal A., & Chhatre A. (2011). Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking,<br />

forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation, Science, Vol.331, pp. 1606-1608,<br />

ISSN 0036-8075<br />

Poffenberger, M., & McGean, B. (Eds.). (1996). Village Voices, Forest Choices, Joint Forest<br />

Management in <strong>India</strong>, Oxford University Press, ISBN 019-5636-83-X, Delhi.<br />

Porter-Bolland, L.,: Ellis, A.E., Guariguata, M.R., Ruiz-Mallén, I., Negrete-Yankelevich, S., &<br />

Reyes-García, V. 2011 (2011 In Press). Community managed forests and forest<br />

protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics.<br />

Forest Ecology and Management. ISSN 0378-1127<br />

Producciones de la Hamaca & Community Conservation Consultants. (1998). Sarstoon-<br />

Temash National Park, Transcript of Stakeholders’, Workshop. Producciones de la<br />

Hamaca, Cay Caulker, Belize and Orang-utan Press, Gays Mills, Wisconsin<br />

Rhoades, R.E. & Stalling, J. (2001). Integrated Conservation and Development in Tropical<br />

America, SANREP CRSP and CARE—SUBIR, ISBN 1-59111-009-2, Quito, Ecuador.<br />

Robinson, J.G. & Redford, K.H. (2005). Jack of all trades, master of none: inherent<br />

contradictions among ICD approaches, In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, T.O.<br />

McShane & M.P. Wells (Eds.), pp. (10-340, Columbia University Press, ISBN 023-<br />

1127-64-2, New York.<br />

Robinson, J.G. (1993). The limits to caring: sustainable living and the loss of biodiversity.<br />

Conservation Biology, Vol.7, pp. 20-28, ISSN 0888-8892<br />

Sayer, J. & Wells, M.P. (2004). The pathology of projects, In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to<br />

Work, T.O. McShane & M.P. Wells (Eds.), pp. (35-48), Columbia University Press,<br />

ISBN 023-1127-64-2, New York<br />

Schipper, J. ; et al. (2008). The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity,<br />

threat, and knowledge. Science, Vol.322, pp. 225-230, ISSN 0036-8078<br />

Schmitt, C.B.; et al. 2009 Global Analysis of the protection status of the world’s forests.<br />

Biological Conservation, Vol.142, pp.2122-2130, ISSN 0006-3207<br />

Shanee, N.; Shanee, S. & Maldonado, A.M. (2007). Conservation Assessment and Planning<br />

for the Yellow Tailed Woolly Monkey (Oreonax flavicauda) in Peru. Wildlife Biology<br />

in Practice, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 73-82, ISSN 1646-1509<br />

317


318<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Shepard, G. (2004). Poverty and forests: sustaining livelihoods in integrated conservation<br />

and development, In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, T.O. McShane & M.P.<br />

Wells (Eds.), pp. (340-371), Columbia University Press, ISBN 0888-8892, New York.<br />

Singleton, S. (1998). Constructing Cooperation The Evolution of Institutions of Comanagement.,The<br />

University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor<br />

Soares-Filho, B. et al. (2010). Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change<br />

mitigation. PNAS, Vol. 107, No. 24, pp.10821-10826<br />

Srivastava, A.; Biswas, J., Das, J., & Bezbarua, P. (2001). Status and distribution of golden<br />

langurs (Trachypithecus geei) in Assam, <strong>India</strong>. American Journal of Primatology, Vol.55,<br />

pp.15-23., ISSN 0275-2565<br />

SSC (Species Conservation Planning Task Force). (2008). Strategic Planning for Species<br />

Conservation: A Handbook, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.<br />

Stevens, S. (ed.), (1997). Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and<br />

Protected Areas, Island Press, ISBN 155-9634-49-9, Washington, DC<br />

Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (1999). Partnerships for Protection, Earthscan Publications, Ltd.,<br />

ISNBN 185-3836-14-1, London<br />

Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for Nature. Island Press, ISBN 155-9635-87-8, Washington, DC.<br />

Turner, W.R.; Brandon, K., Brooks, T.M., Costanza, R., da Fonseca, G.A.B., & Portella, R.<br />

(2007). Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience,<br />

Vol.57, pp. 868-873, ISSN 0006-3568<br />

Uphoff, N. & Langholz, J. (1998). Incentives for avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons?<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Conservation, Vol.25, pp. 251-261, ISSN 0376-8929<br />

USAID. (2005). USAID/Namibia Annual Report. FY2005. June 16, 2005. Accessed on December<br />

12, 2010. Available from: http://www.dec.org,<br />

Vincent, K. (1994). Report of the Community-Based Ecotourism Gathering. Ministry of Tourism<br />

and the <strong>Environment</strong> and Belize Enterprise for Sustained Technology, Belmopan.<br />

Wells, M.P.; McShane, T.O., Dublin, H.T., O’Connor, S., & Redford, K.H. (2004). The future<br />

of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what worked, In:<br />

Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, T.O. McShane & M.P. Wells (Eds.), pp. (398-<br />

421), Columbia University Press, ISBN 023-1127-64-2, New York.<br />

Westley, F.; Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M.Q. (2006). Getting to Maybe How the World is<br />

Changed, Random House, ISBN 978-0-679-31443-1, Canada.<br />

Wilson, K. (2002). The new microfinance, an essay on the Self-Help group movement in<br />

<strong>India</strong>. Journal of Microfinance, Vol.4, pp. 217-245<br />

Young, C. & Horwich, R.H. (2007). History of protected area designation, co-management<br />

and community participation in Belize, In: Taking Stock: Belize at 25 Years of<br />

Independence, B.S.Balboni. & J.O. Palacio (Eds.), pp. (123-150), Cubola Books, ISBN<br />

978-976-8161-18-5, Benque Viejo del Carmen, Belize.


15<br />

Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent<br />

and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Óscar M. Chaves<br />

Instituto para la Conservación y el Desarrollo Sostenible (INCODESO), San José<br />

Costa Rica<br />

During the 2000-2010 period, worldwide deforestation, mainly due to conversion of forests<br />

to agricultural lands, was responsible for the loss of 5.2 million ha of forest per year or 140<br />

km 2 of forest per day (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO],<br />

2010a). During this same period, Central America loss 248,000 ha of forest per year and, with<br />

the exception of Costa Rica, the forest cover continues decreasing in the area (Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2010a). Tropical forest deforestation<br />

and the consequent habitat loss and forest fragmentation are among the main causes of the<br />

global decline in biodiversity (Brook et al., 2003; Sehgal, 2010). For this reason, studies<br />

evaluating the efficiency of the strategies contributing to prevent, minimize, and revert the<br />

forest covert loss are critical for the long-term survival of many species of plants and<br />

animals (including human beings).<br />

Costa Rica is often hailed as a model for how developing nations can balance the protection<br />

of the nature and the economic development. The country is recognized to devoted ca. 25%<br />

of its territory to forest conservation and for the income that the country generates from<br />

different sustainable activities (Buchsbaum, 2004; Food and Agriculture Organization of the<br />

United Nations [FAO], 2010a).<br />

However, the “conservationist” reputation of the country is relatively recent and largely<br />

contrasts from the unsustainable practices driving the economic model of Central America<br />

during the second half the XX century. Overall, the land speculation by cattle ranchers in<br />

combination with interest rate subsidies (i.e., financial incentives widely provided by<br />

government entities and public banks) is pointed as the main cause of deforestation in Costa<br />

Rica and in the rest of Latin America (Kull et al., 2007; Roebeling & Hendrix, 2010). Thus,<br />

since 1960 most government policies, national and international investment, and<br />

international cooperation programs have all promoted the deforestation, colonization, and<br />

“hamburgerization” (i.e., the pasture expansion for the beef industry proliferation for export<br />

to USA) of the Central American land (Harrison, 1989; Myers, 1981). As result of these<br />

“depredatory” politics, Costa Rican’s forest cover decreased from 2.71 million ha in 1950 to<br />

1.01 million ha in 1983, while the deforestation rates increased from 36,018 ha/year during<br />

the 1950-1961 period to 97,317 ha/year during 1977-1983 (reviewed by Harrison, 1989).<br />

However, the economic balance for the beef industry was extraordinary positive because the<br />

number of head cattle exported to USA explosively increased from 6903 in 1955 to 148,882 in<br />

1973. Even after 1983, the Costa Rican’s government across the Instituto de Desarrollo


320<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Agrario (IDA) continued promoting the deforestation and clearing of 500,000 ha of<br />

“underutilized lands” (i.e., forested or partially forested lands). Most of these lands were<br />

distributed among poor “campesinos”and/or small farmers to incentive the agriculture<br />

(Harrison, 1989).<br />

Although there is a complex network of environmental, social, economic, and politic factors<br />

influencing the changes in forest cover in the country (Calvo-Alvarado et al., 2009; Kull et al.,<br />

2007; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2001; Sánchez-Azofeifa & Van Laake, 2004), most studies<br />

highlight the importance of the ecotourism, the payments for environmental services, the<br />

private nature reserves, and the environmental education as strategies to prevent, minimize,<br />

and/or revert the deforestation in the country. These four factors are described below.<br />

1.1 Ecotourism<br />

Ecotourism is often perceived as an excellent tool for sustainable development in<br />

developing countries (Almeyda et al., 2010; Gossling, 1999). Among the main benefits of this<br />

“green” economic strategy frequently are mentioned: (1) the protection of forest resources<br />

and hence the prevention of deforestation in general, and (2) the economic benefits for local<br />

communities (Gossling, 1999; Horton, 2009).<br />

Since the boom of the ecotourism in Costa Rica, at the end of 1980s and into the 1990s, the<br />

activities related with ecotourism (e.g., proliferation of eco-lodges and/or private reserves,<br />

nature-tours, and agro-ecotourism), represent one of the main economic activities of the<br />

country (Koens et al., 2009; Weaver, 1999). Corresponding with this “boom”, the hotel sector<br />

in the country has grown over 400% from 1987 to 2000 (Instituto Centroamericano de<br />

Administración de Negocios [INCAE], 2000). As result, the agro-export economic model<br />

based in the extensive plantations of coffee and banana (i.e., the main economic activity<br />

since the nineteenth century), was displaced to a secondary place as source of economic<br />

resources (Iveniuk, 2006). Thus, annually ca. 1.2 million tourists visit the country, which<br />

result in an annual turnover range from US$ 1200 million in 2003 to US$ 1983 million in 2010<br />

(Instituto Costarricense de Turismo [ICT], 2011a).<br />

Although the above, some researchers question the contribution of the ecotourism to<br />

conservation and community development due to some potential negative impacts such as<br />

habitat destruction, waste generation, visitor impacts, and socio-cultural ills (Stem et al.,<br />

2003; Wearing & Neil, 2009). Below I discuss this topic in the light of the evidence provided<br />

by different case studies in Costa Rica.<br />

1.2 Payments for <strong>Environment</strong>al Services (PES)<br />

The payment for environmental services is an economic incentive received to the landowners<br />

for the services and goods provided for their forested lands or forest patches (Sánchez-<br />

Azofeifa et al., 2007). In Costa Rica the current PES system was created with the 1996 Forestry<br />

Law 7575, which recognizes four main environmental services: mitigation of green house gas<br />

emissions, hydrological services, biodiversity conservation, and provision of scenic beauty for<br />

recreation and ecotourism (Kull et al., 2007; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2007).<br />

The Forestry Law 7575 provides the legal and regulatory basis to contract with landowners<br />

for the environmental services provided by their lands, empowers the National Forestry<br />

Financing Fund (FONAFIFO) to issue such contracts, and establishes a financing mechanism<br />

for this purpose (Sánchez-Azofeifa et al., 2007; Sierra & Russman, 2006). Previously to<br />

receive the PES economic benefits, the landowners need sign a 5-10 year contract with the


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

government, agreeing to either protect forest cover or engage in reforestation. Funding for<br />

PES program comes from a 3.5% fossil fuel tax, private-sector and international donor<br />

contributions, a World Bank loan, and the sale of carbon offsets to industrialized countries<br />

established in the Kyoto Protocol (Kull et al., 2007).<br />

The percent of the country territory receiving PES increase from 5.5% (representing 4400<br />

contracts) in 2001 to 7.3% (representing 4600 contracts) in 2010 (National Forestry Financing<br />

Fund [FONAFIFO], 2011). According with the same source, currently PES covers 373,074 ha<br />

of forests in different succession stages and protects ca. 2.7 million of trees throughout the 7<br />

provinces of the country. Although this program might facilitate field abandonment in some<br />

marginal zones already affected by agricultural liberalization (Sierra & Russman, 2006), its<br />

relative efficiency as deforestation-avoiding strategy is even polemic.<br />

1.3 Private nature reserves<br />

Traditionally, conservation efforts to preserve the Costa Rican’ natural legacy (i.e.,<br />

ecosystems and species) have been focused on the establishment of government-controlled<br />

areas such as national parks, wildlife refuges, biological reserves, and other management<br />

categories (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2010b).<br />

However, with the boom of the ecotourism at the end of 1980s and into the 1990s (see<br />

above), this fact has changed noticeably. Thus, the number of private reserves registered<br />

increases from 65 reserves in 2005 to ca. 200 reserves in 2011 (Red Costarricense de Reservas<br />

Naturales, 2011).<br />

Overall, private reserves range from 20 to 1500 ha in size (Herzog & Vaughan, 1998; Red<br />

Costarricense de Reservas Naturales, pers. comm.) and together cover over 81,429 ha of<br />

forests along the country (Red Costarricense de Reservas Naturales, 2011). This fact<br />

highlights the importance of private landholdings in the fate of the Costa Rican forests,<br />

particularly in the trends in the forest cover along the time.<br />

1.4 <strong>Environment</strong>al Education (EE)<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al education is the process of recognizing values and clarifying concepts in order<br />

to develop skills and attitudes necessary to understand and appreciate the interrelatedness<br />

among men, his culture and his biophysical surroundings (International Union for the<br />

Conservation of Nature [IUCN], 1970). Overall, acording to Jacobson (1991) a well-designed<br />

and well-implemented EE program have the potential to increase ecological awareness, foster<br />

favorable attitudes toward the environment, and promote the conservation of the natural<br />

resources (including discourage of deforestation and/or selective logging). Even, some<br />

authors consider that an appropriate EE might produce significant behavioral changes in the<br />

people and hence, may be more crucial to successful long-term conservation than a strictly<br />

scientific work (Blum, 2008; Jacobson, 1991; Palmer, 1998).<br />

In this sense, since 1980s Costa Rica has been one of the world-leaders in efforts to promote<br />

environmental learning and national policies integrating education, conservation, and<br />

different sustainable activities related to ecotourism (Blum, 2008). For instance, as early as<br />

1975, the Universidad Nacional (one of the most important public universities in the country)<br />

established a School of <strong>Environment</strong>al Sciences which included an environmental education<br />

program. Similarly in 1994, the National Council of Vice-Chancellors created an Inter-<br />

University Commission for <strong>Environment</strong>al Education which works to ‘environmentalise’ all of<br />

the state universities (Oficina de Educación Ambiental, 2002). Currently, most of the<br />

321


322<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

environmental education in Costa Rican schools and/or communities is supported by the<br />

Ministry of <strong>Environment</strong> and diverse non-governmental organizations (Blum, 2008).<br />

Nevertheless, to date the controversy on the relative efficiency of the aforementioned factors<br />

as deforestation-avoiding strategies still persist. Some authors concludes that the current<br />

expansive network of efforts in conservation, environmental management, education and<br />

ecotourism contribute directly to prevent and minimize the deforestation in the country<br />

(e.g., Blum, 2008). Conversely, other authors support that the forest cover recovery in some<br />

areas of Costa Rica have been result of a process referred as “forest transition” (i.e.,<br />

deforestation trends are replaced with reforestation following the trends in the economic<br />

development and urbanization), rather a direct effect of the environmental policies (Calvo-<br />

Alvarado et al., 2009; Schelhas & Sánchez-Azofeifa, 2006). Therefore, in this chapter I<br />

reviewed the available literature to assess the relative efficiency of the ecotourism, PES,<br />

private reserves and environmental education to prevent, mitigate, and/or reverts the<br />

deforestation in different regions of Costa Rica. Finally, I synthesize the major strengths and<br />

weaknesses of these strategies and suggest future directions to minimize the deforestation<br />

and to improve the environmental performance in the country.<br />

2. Methods<br />

2.1 Literature review<br />

To achieve the main objectives of this study, I conducted a systematic review of published<br />

articles, book chapters and dissertations up to August 2011 using ISI Web of Science,<br />

Biological Abstracts, Google Scholar, and Costa Rican environmental agencies online data<br />

bases. Overall, I amassed a total of 90 studies on the study topic distributed as follow: 36<br />

studies on ecotourism, 17 studies on payment for environmental services, 8 studies on<br />

private nature reserves, and 29 studies on environmental education.<br />

2.2 Efficiency indicators<br />

To determine the efficiency of the above mentioned strategies I used changes in deforestation<br />

rates and/or forest cover before the implementation of each strategy and 4-20 years after its<br />

implementation in the same region. As sources of the information on the deforestation rates<br />

and/or forest cover in the sites in which a particular strategy was implemented, I used the<br />

information available in the literature and in online data bases from the Ministerio del<br />

Ambiente, Energía y Tecnología (MINAET) de Costa Rica (http://www.minae.go.cr/),<br />

Sistema de Infomación de Recursos Forestales (http://www.sirefor.go.cr), Fondo Nacional de<br />

Financiamiento Forestal (http://www.fonafifo.com/), Oficina Naciona Forestal (ONF),<br />

Tribunal Ambiental Administrativo (http://www.tribunalambiental.org), and Centro de<br />

Derecho Ambiental y de Recursos Naturales (http://www.cedarena.org/).<br />

2.3 Statistical analysis<br />

To evaluate if forest area covers by private and public forests differed between years, I used<br />

generalized linear models (GLM: Lehman et al., 2005). I constructed the following model:<br />

AREA = FOREST TYPE (PRIVATE AND PUBLIC) nested within YEAR + FOREST<br />

TYPE*YEAR. Data were first arcsine transformed, and tested for a normal distribution with<br />

a Shapiro-Wilk test (passed, P>0.05). I then selected Normal distribution with an identity<br />

link-function to the response variable. I performed the statistical analyses using JMP<br />

(version 7.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

Table 1. Three study case on ecotourism efficiency in different top tourism areas of Costa<br />

Rica.<br />

323


324<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

3.1 Relative efficiency of ecotourism<br />

Overall, the findings for the three analyzed case studies (Table 1) concur with previous<br />

studies suggesting that ecotourism represent a valuable tool for conservation and<br />

sustainable development (e.g., Almeyda et al., 2010; Ceballos-Lascurain, 1998; Wearing &<br />

Neil, 2009). Although in the three case studies there are some negative aspects, the general<br />

balance undoubtedly can favors the forest protection and the ecosystem regeneration (Table<br />

1). Similarly, there is evidence indicating that the expansion of the ecotourism plays a<br />

relevant role in the reduction of the deforestation in Costa Rica. Thus, considering forests on<br />

farmlands and non-farmland areas, the deforestation rates decreased from 47,219 ha/year<br />

during the 1950-1961 decade to 15,677 ha during 1973-1984 (reviewed by Harrison, 1989),<br />

which correspond to the boom of ecotourism in the country (see above).<br />

However, other studies do not support that ecotourism per se have a relevant role as<br />

deforestation-avoiding strategy. For instance, Kruger (2005) in his review of 251 ecotourism<br />

case studies found that ecotourism did not create enough revenues to prevent ‘consumptive’<br />

land use (e.g., forest conversion to agriculture or pasture) among households. Furthermore,<br />

the increasing development in the ecotourism “hotspots” of Costa Rica (e.g., Nicoya, Monte<br />

Verde, Siquirres, Motezuma, Quepos) might result in a higher deforestation in theses areas.<br />

Thus, Almeyda et al. (2010) mention that uncontrolled development of standard hotel<br />

operations and large condo developments in Nicoya, seeks to capitalise on the region’s<br />

natural beauty and may reverse land cover trends if they are not accompanied by adequate<br />

forest conservation strategies and government monitoring.<br />

3.2 Relative efficiency of the PES<br />

Since the implementation of PES the amount of industrial wood extracted from forests<br />

gradually decreased from 248,362 m 3 in 1998 to ca. 50,000 m 3 in the years 1999-2006 (Figure 1).<br />

Conversely, wood derived from agroforestry increased from 458,538 m 3 in 1998 to a maximum<br />

value of 673,426 m 3 in 2001 and two years latter this value drop to 205,401 m 3 and remained<br />

relatively constant until 2007 (Figure 1). Furthermore, during this period occurred a noticeable<br />

increase in the amount of wood derived from forest plantations (mainly Smelina arborea and<br />

Tectona grandis, National Forestry Financing Fund, pers. comm.) (Figure 1). Similarly, during the<br />

period 2000-2010 (i.e., 15 year after the implementation of PES), the forest area of Costa Rica<br />

increased from 2.37 to 2.60 million hectares (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United<br />

Nations [FAO], 2010a). However, the history of the forest cover was quite different during the<br />

1980s when the nation was losing 4% of its forest cover annually—the highest deforestation<br />

rate in the western hemisphere at the time (Carriere, 1991). Indeed, between 1970 and 1980<br />

more than 7000 km 2 were cleared, and by 1987 total forest cover had been reduced to only 31%<br />

of the land mass or approximately 16,000 km 2 (Carriere, 1991).<br />

Currently there are 4599 PES contracts covering 373,074 ha of lands along the country. Most<br />

of the area covered by PES (70%) was devoted to forest protection. Similarly, from the four<br />

main PES categories, most contracts were devoted to forest protection (54.2%), following by<br />

reforestation (29.8%), protection of wildlife areas (6.4%), and forest management (1.5%)<br />

(Table 2). This suggests that PES can promotes the protection of the forest cover in different<br />

private nature lands, at least during the contract period (i.e., 5-years). However, there was a<br />

large variation in the number of contracts and area covered by PES among provinces (Table<br />

2). Alajuela province presented the larger number of contracts (1045 contracts) and


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

cumulative number of hectares covered by PES (73,516 ha), while the lower values were<br />

found in Cartago province (130 contracts and 28,822 ha, respectively) (Table 2).<br />

Volume of industrial wood (m3)<br />

1,000,000<br />

900,000<br />

800,000<br />

700,000<br />

600,000<br />

500,000<br />

400,000<br />

300,000<br />

200,000<br />

100,000<br />

0<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Year<br />

Fig. 1. Amount of industrial wood extracted from agroforestry, forests, and forest<br />

plantations during a 10-year period. Source: Oficina Nacional Forestal (ONF) (2009).<br />

Province<br />

No.<br />

contracts<br />

Total area<br />

(ha)<br />

325<br />

Agroforestry<br />

Forest<br />

Forest plantation<br />

Hectares covered by PES category (No. contracts) a<br />

Forest protection Reforestation PWA FM Total<br />

Alajuela 1045 73,516.67 38,292.08 (447)<br />

21,255.07<br />

(443)<br />

6786.8<br />

(63)<br />

2351.82 68,685.77<br />

(31) (984)<br />

Limón 652 70,894.68 52,346.37 (389)<br />

3099.17<br />

(149)<br />

9645.7<br />

(44)<br />

587.32<br />

(10)<br />

65,678.56<br />

(592)<br />

Puntarenas 670 69,662.64 56,742.44 (422)<br />

3705.7<br />

(146)<br />

5928<br />

(62)<br />

0<br />

66,376<br />

(630)<br />

Guanacaste 1027 63,290.57 46,582.38 (541)<br />

11,130.89<br />

(375)<br />

547.5<br />

(10)<br />

0<br />

58,260.77<br />

(926)<br />

Heredia 484 35,722.00 18,989.42 (213)<br />

3885.51<br />

(113)<br />

8745.9<br />

(83)<br />

1792.66 33,413.49<br />

(30) (439)<br />

San José 590 31,165.95 24,462.32 (392)<br />

2430.23<br />

(122)<br />

1785.6<br />

(18)<br />

0<br />

28,678.15<br />

(532)<br />

Cartago 130 28,822.38 24,074.58 (90)<br />

848.4<br />

(21)<br />

3429.1<br />

(14)<br />

0<br />

28,352.08<br />

(124)<br />

Total 4599 373,074.90 261,489.59(2494)<br />

46,354.98<br />

(1369)<br />

36,868.60 4731.8<br />

(294) (71) 349,444.96<br />

aPWA= Protection of wildlife area, FM= forest management.<br />

Table 2. Current area covered by PES category in the 7 provinces of Costa Rica. Data come<br />

from the National Forestry Financing Fund of Costa Rica, FONAFIFO, (2011). Data are<br />

ordered according to the total area protected.


326<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The aforementioned trends in forest cover recovery might be related to the different<br />

environmental restrictions and government incentives related to the PES established in the<br />

Forestry Law 7575. However, other authors suggest that the increase in the forest cover<br />

observed in different areas of Costa Rica are in fact a result of a process of “forest transition”<br />

(Calvo-Alvarado et al., 2009; Schelhas & Sánchez-Azofeifa, 2006). For instance, Calvo-<br />

Alvarado et al. (2009) analyzed the process of deforestation and restoration of the tropical<br />

dry forest in Guanacaste, Costa Rica, using socioeconomic data and satellite images of the<br />

forest cover from 1960 to 2005. They concluded that the restoration of the Guanacaste′s<br />

forest cover after the 1980s was the result of multiple socioeconomic factors rather than the<br />

efficiency of the PES. Similarly, Almeyda et al. (2010) found that the proportion of forest<br />

cover in the Nicoya peninsula decrease from 0.51 in 1987 to 0.36 in 2008, indicating a poor<br />

efficiency of the PES or any other potential deforestation-avoiding strategies implemented<br />

by the government during that period.<br />

For this reason, Calvo-Alvarado et al. (2009) mentions that neither the PES nor the other<br />

conservation policies implemented in the country are enough to protect this tropical dry<br />

forest at the long-term. This statement might be particularly true if we take in consideration<br />

the multiple financial limitations of the MINAET and the limited number of environmental<br />

inspectors of the Secretaría Técnica Nacional Ambiental, the public institution responsible<br />

for authorizing the construction and monitoring the environmental performance of the<br />

diverse public and private infrastructures along the country (MINAET, pers. comm.).<br />

3.3 Relative efficiency of private nature reserves<br />

During the decades 1990s and 2000s the forest area on control of private landholdings was<br />

noticeable greater than the forest area on control of the government (Figure 2). Nevertheless,<br />

the latter forest area was duplicated from 1990 to 2005 (Figure 2). However, until today, most<br />

of the Costa Rican forests (55%) are on control of private landholdings (Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2010b). Overall, the forest cover protected by the<br />

private reserves increased ca. 2.5 times from 1995 (32,895 ha) to 2010 (81,429 ha) (Programa<br />

Estado de la Nación, 2011). Interestingly, from the 200 private reserves recorded until 2010<br />

only a minimal part is managed by individual landowners. Thus, 52% of private reserves are<br />

managed by non-government organizations (mainly public universities and non-profit<br />

conservationist institutions), 46% are managed by profit organizations, and only 2% are<br />

managed by individual landowners (Programa Estado de la Nación, 2011). This fact<br />

undoubtedly can benefit the long-term conservation of these areas because contrasting with<br />

individual landowners, the activities of the non-profit organizations and universities are<br />

frequently monitored by different government institutions and hence, it is more difficult to<br />

they change the land use of the forested areas. The deforestation and/or selective logging in<br />

reserves management by individual landowners is hard to detect and penalize (particularly<br />

when there is not a formal denounce) (Tribunal Ambiental Administrativo, 2011 ).<br />

On the other hand, considering both private reserves and mixed public-private areas, they<br />

cover over 13% of the total continental area of the country while the government-protected<br />

forests cover 21% of this area (Table 3). Additionally, as in most America Latina, the main<br />

uses of these reserves are ecotourism and investigation (Mesquita, 1999). Furthermore, since<br />

private reserves often are located in ecoregions poorly represented in the government<br />

system and in regions of the country without existing reserves, they might also contributes<br />

to protects a number of threatened animals such as agouti, peccary, jaguar, and puma


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

(Herzog & Vaughan, 1998). These facts strongly suggest that the private reserves play an<br />

important role in the protection of the forest cover in Costa Rica. Even, some of these reserves<br />

are also important research centers and frequently receive researches and students of diverse<br />

countries of the world. For instance, the La Selva Biological Station protects 1600 ha of primary<br />

tropical rainforest, (including 1000 tree species and 420 bird species), and also is one of the<br />

most well-studied and recognized tropical rainforest around the world with hundreds of<br />

scientific publications in high-impact international journals.<br />

Management category N Area (ha) %STAa % of the countryb Goverment-protected areas<br />

National Parks 28 629,121 37.1 12.3<br />

Biological Reserve 8 22,036 1.3 0.4<br />

Wildlife Refugie 12 61,708 3.6 1.2<br />

Absoult Natural Reserve 2 1,369 0.8 0<br />

Indigenous Reserves 24 335,851 19.8 6.6<br />

National Monument and<br />

other reserves<br />

3 23,768 1.4 0.5<br />

subtotal<br />

Mixed (Public-Private)<br />

77 1,073.853 64 21<br />

Wildlife Refugie 25 106,572 6.3 2.1<br />

Protected Zone 31 157,715 9.3 3.1<br />

Forest Reserve 9 221,239 13.0 4.3<br />

Wetland 13 68,543 4.0 1.3<br />

subtotal<br />

Private Reserves<br />

78 554,069 32.66 10.8<br />

Wildlife Refuges 34 68,447 4.03 1.3<br />

Natural Reserves 72 52,156 NA 1<br />

subtotal 106 120,603 4.03 2.3<br />

aPercent of total protected area.<br />

bPercent of the continental area of the country (i.e., 51,100 km2).<br />

Table 3. Area covered by public and private protected areas in Costa Rica during 2007.<br />

Modified from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO (2010b).<br />

3.4 Relative efficiency of environmental education<br />

The findings indicated that most environment education programs (EEP) in Costa Rica are<br />

linked to different ecotourism activities (79% of 29 analyzed studies), following by activities<br />

promoted by government and/or non-profit organizations. Currently, most Costa Rican<br />

eco-lodges, private reserves, and ecoturism companies have EEPs for employees, visitants<br />

and/or local inhabitants (Instituto Costarricense de Turismo [ICT], pers. comm.). Even, the<br />

EEP is an essential requirement for all those companies and institutions procuring the<br />

Certification for Sustainable Tourism (CST, see below). Currently, 178 eco-lodges, 59<br />

tourism agencies, and 4 car rental agencies are certificated (Instituto Costarricense de<br />

Turismo [ICT], 2011b), and hence with some type of EEP in course.<br />

Unfortunately, in most cases it is not possible to evaluate the relative efficiency of<br />

environmental education as deforestation-avoiding strategy due that its effect is difficult to<br />

separate from other complementary conservation strategies. Nevertheless, evidence<br />

327


328<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

suggests that it contributes significantly to reinforce conservation attitudes of the people<br />

respect to the deforestation and other environmental problems (Blum, 2008; Koens et al.,<br />

2009; Palmer, 1998). Further studies in particular communities of Costa Rica are necessary to<br />

evaluate if the environmental education per se is able to minimize, or even revert, the<br />

deforestation at the long-term.<br />

Forest area (x 1000 ha)<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Aa<br />

Aa<br />

Ab Ab<br />

1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

2005<br />

Fig. 2. Changes in the number of forest hectares under government and private management<br />

in Costa Rica. Different capital letters indicate significant differences among years, and<br />

different lowercase letters indicate differences among reserve type (contrast tests, P


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

vulnerable forested areas (i.e., those that contain threated species of animals and plants<br />

and/or water reservoir). When necessary, the government should consider the<br />

expropriation of some of these areas to guarantee their ecological integrity.<br />

Furthermore, to a more efficient control of the deforestation and/or logging along the<br />

country, it is important increase the resources invested in the environmental monitoring. In<br />

this sense, are necessary more private and public initiatives to monitoring and penalize the<br />

deforestation and other environmental crimes and/or reinforce those initiatives that have<br />

showed be successful. For instance, one successful initiative is the 2008′ public program<br />

namely “barridas ambientales” from the Tribunal Ambiental Admistrativo. In this initiative,<br />

a multidisciplinary team of biologists, forest engineers, chemistries, and lawyers carried out<br />

sudden visits (5-10 times/year) to different areas of the country and, with the cooperation of<br />

the local inhabitants, they detect, record, and sanction any environmental crime (including<br />

illegal logging). As result, the number of denounces has been increased by a 100% (Tribunal<br />

Ambiental Administrativo, 2011). Other interesting initiative is the program Certification for<br />

Sustainable Tourism (CST), from the Instituto Costarricense de Turismo. This program was<br />

designed to differentiated businesses of the tourism sector, based on way that they interact<br />

with the nature, local communities, and social resources in general (Instituto Costarricense<br />

de Turismo [ICT], 2011b).<br />

5. Acknowledgements<br />

I thank Júlio César Bicca-Marques for logistical support for the redaction of this chapter in<br />

Brazil. The Ministerio del Ambiente, Energía y Telecomunicaciones de Costa Rica<br />

(MINAET) provided important information on changes in the forest cover in different<br />

regions of Costa Rica.<br />

6. References<br />

Almeyda, A. M., Broadbent, E. N., Wyman, M. S., & Durham, W. H. (2010). Ecotourism<br />

Impacts in the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. International Journal of Tourism<br />

Research, 12:803-819<br />

Blum, N. (2008). <strong>Environment</strong>al education in Costa Rica: building a framework for<br />

sustainable development? International Journal of Educational Development 28:348-<br />

358.<br />

Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S., & Ng, P. K. L. (2003). Catastrophic extinctions follow<br />

deforestation in Singapore. Nature, Vol. 424, pp. 420-423.<br />

Buckley R. (2003). Case studies in ecotourism, CABI Publishing, Cambridge, 264 p<br />

Buchsbaum, B. D. (2004). Ecotourism and sustainable development in Costa Rica. M.Sc.<br />

dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, 59 p.<br />

Calvo-Alvarado, J., McLennan, B., Sánchez-Azofeifa, A., & Garvin, T. (2009). Deforestation<br />

and forest restoration in Guanacaste, Costa Rica: putting conservation policies in<br />

context. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 258, pp. 931-940<br />

Carriere, J. (1991). The crisis in Costa Rica: an ecological perspective. In: <strong>Environment</strong> and<br />

development in Latin America: the politics of sustainability, Redclift, M. & Goodman, D.,<br />

(Eds.), pp. 184-204, Manchester University Press, Manchester<br />

329


330<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Ceballos-Lascurain, H. (1998). Ecotourism as a worldwide phenomenon. In: Ecotourism: a<br />

guide for planners and managers, Lindberg, K. & Hawkins, D. (Eds.), The Ecotourism<br />

Society, North Bennington<br />

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO. (2010a). Global forest<br />

resource assessment 2010, FAO, Rome, Retrieved from<br />

<br />

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO. (2010b). Evaluación de los<br />

recursos forestales mundiales 2010: informe Costa Rica, FAO, Rome, Retrieved from<br />

<br />

Gossling, S. (1999). Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions?<br />

Ecological Economics, Vol. 29, pp. 303-320<br />

Harrison, S. (1989). Population, land use, and deforestation in Costa Rica, 1950-1983, Standford<br />

University, California, 75 p<br />

Herzog, P., & Vaughan, C. (1998). Conserving biological diversity in the tropics: the role of<br />

private nature reserves in Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, Vol. 46, pp. 183-<br />

190<br />

Honey, M. (1999). Ecotourism and Sustainable Development. Who owns Paradise?, Island Press,<br />

Washington D.C.<br />

Horton, L. R. (2009). Buying up nature economic and social impacts of Costa Rica's<br />

ecotourism boom. Latin American Perspectives, Vol. 36, pp. 93-107<br />

Instituto Centroamericano de Administración de Negocios, INCAE. (2000). Tourism in<br />

Costa Rica: a competitive challenge, INCAE, San José, Costa Rica<br />

Instituto Costarricense de Turismo, ICT. (2011a). Cifras turísticas. Accessed: 10 October 2011.<br />

Available from: <br />

Instituto Costarricense de Turismo, ICT. (2011b). Sustainability CST. Accessed: 15 December<br />

2011. Available from:<br />

<br />

IUCN. (1970). International Working Meeting on <strong>Environment</strong>al Education in the School<br />

Curriculum, UNESCO, Paris<br />

Iveniuk, J. (2006). The consumption of conservation ecotourism in Costa Rica. Nexus, Vol. 19,<br />

pp. 102-125<br />

Jacobson, S. K. (1991). Evaluation model for developing, implementing, and assessing<br />

conservation education programs: examples from Belize and Costa Rica.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Management, Vol. 15, pp. 143–150<br />

Koens, J. F., Dieperink, C., & Miranda, M. (2009). Ecotourism as a development strategy:<br />

experiences from Costa Rica. <strong>Environment</strong>, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 11,<br />

pp. 1225-1237<br />

Kruger, O. (2005). The role of ecotourism in conservation: Panacea or Pandora’s box?<br />

Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 14, pp. 579-600<br />

Kull, C. A., Ibrahim, C. K., & Meredith, T. C. (2007). Tropical forest transitions and<br />

globalization: neo-liberalism, migration, tourism, and international conservation<br />

agendas. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 20, pp. 723-737<br />

Lehman, A., O’Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (2005). JMP® for basic univariate and<br />

multivariate statistics: a step-by-step guide, SAS Institute, North Carolina, USA


Efficiency of the Strategies to Prevent and Mitigate the Deforestation in Costa Rica<br />

Liverman, D. M., & Vilas, S. (2006). Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America.<br />

Annual Review of <strong>Environment</strong> and Resources, Vol. 31, lines 327-363<br />

Mesquita, C. A. B. (1999). Caracterización de las reservas naturales privadas en América Latina.<br />

CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica<br />

Myers, N. (1981). The hamburger connection: how Central America’s forests become North<br />

America’s hamburgers. Ambio, Vol. 10, pp. 3-8<br />

National Forestry Financing Fund. (2011). In: Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal,<br />

FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica. Accessed: 10 October 2011. Available from: <<br />

http://www.fonafifo.go.cr/paginas_espanol/consultas_psa/e_cp_mapas.htm><br />

Oficina de Educación Ambiental. (2002). Marco conceptual, legal y áreas de acción de la Oficina<br />

de Educación Ambiental, Oficina de Educación Ambiental, Ministerio de Educación<br />

Pública, San José, Costa Rica<br />

Oficina Nacional Forestal, ONF. (2009). Registros de madera en rollo procesada por la<br />

industria, periodo 1998-2007. Ministerio del Ambiente, Energía y Tecnología<br />

(MINAET), San José, Costa Rica<br />

Palmer, J. A. (1998). <strong>Environment</strong>al education in the 21st century: theory, practice, progress and<br />

promise. Routledge, New York<br />

Programa Estado de la Nación. (2011). Decimoséptimo Informe Estado de la Nación en<br />

Desarrollo Humano Sostenible. Aspectos ambientales. Consejo Nacional de<br />

Rectores, San José, Costa Rica<br />

Red Costarricense de Reservas Naturales (2011). Red Costarricense de Reservas Naturales, San<br />

José, Costa Rica. Accessed: 5 October 2011. Available from:<br />

<br />

Roebeling, P. C., & Hendrix, E. M. T. (2010). Land speculation and interest rate subsidies as a<br />

cause of deforestation: the role of cattle ranching in Costa Rica. Land Use Policy, Vol.<br />

27, pp. 489-496<br />

Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., & Van Laake, P. E. (2004). Focus on deforestation: zooming in on<br />

hot spots in highly fragmented ecosystems in Costa Rica. Agriculture Ecosystems &<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>, Vol. 102, pp. 3-15<br />

Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Pfaff, A., Robalino, J. A., & Boomhower, J. P. (2007). Costa Rica's<br />

payment for environmental services program: Intention, implementation, and<br />

impact. Conservation Biology, Vol. 21, pp. 1165-1173<br />

Sánchez-Azofeifa, G., Harriss, R. C., & Skole, D. L. (2001). Deforestation in Costa Rica: a<br />

quantitative analysis using remote sensing imagery. Biotropica, 33:378-384<br />

Schelhas, J., & Sánchez-Azofeifa, A. (2006). Post-Frontier forest change adjacent to Braulio<br />

Carrillo National Park, Costa Rica. Human Ecology, Vol. 34, pp. 407-431<br />

Sehgal, R. N. M. (2010). Deforestation and avian infectious diseases. Journal of Experimental<br />

Biology, Vol. 213, pp. 955-960<br />

Sierra, R., & Russman, E. (2006). On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a<br />

forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological<br />

Economics, Vol. 59, pp. 131-141<br />

Stem, C.J., Lassoie, J. P., Lee, D. R., Deshler, D. J. (2003). How 'eco' is ecotourism? A<br />

comparative case study of ecotourism in Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,<br />

Vol. 11, pp. 322-347<br />

331


332<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Tribunal Ambiental Administrativo. (2011). In: Tribunal Ambiental Administrativo, MINAET,<br />

San José, Costa Rica. Accessed: 5 December 2011. Available from: <br />

Wearing S, Neil J. (2009). Ecotourism: impacts, potentials, and possibilities, Elsevier, New York,<br />

282 p<br />

Weaver, D. B. (1999). Magnitude of ecotourism in Costa Rica and Kenya. Annals of Tourism<br />

Research, Vol. 26, pp. 792-816


16<br />

Agroforestry Systems<br />

and Local Institutional Development<br />

for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Lorena Soto-Pinto 1,<br />

Miguel A. Castillo-Santiago 2 and Guillermo Jiménez-Ferrer 3<br />

1 Institut de Cíencia i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona,<br />

2 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). Unidad San Cristóbal, Chiapas,<br />

3 Veterinary Faculty, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona,<br />

1,3 Spain<br />

2 Mexico<br />

The transformation of natural forest to secondary forest and pastures has been the most<br />

common process of land use change in tropical countries in recent decades (FAO, 2010). The<br />

main causes of deforestation include institutional factors, markets, public policies and global<br />

forces, which often act synergistically (Deininger and Minten, 1999; Bocco et al. 2001;<br />

Lambin et al., 2001).<br />

Mexico is a country with 64,802x10 3 ha of forested land, and it is one of the ten countries<br />

with the largest area of primary forest (3% of total). The annual net loss of deforestation in<br />

Mexico has been estimated to be 0.52% for the period of 1990-2010, but the net loss, on<br />

average, has decreased over the past few years (FAO, 2010). The highest deforestation rates<br />

are concentrated in the south and central regions of the country, as documented elsewhere:<br />

8.4% in el Nevado de Toluca, state of Mexico (1972-2000) (Maass et al., 2006); 8% in<br />

Patzcuaro, Michoacan (1960-1990) (Klooster, 2000); 6.9% in some areas of Campeche (Reyes-<br />

Hernández et al., 2003); 6.1% in the highlands of the state of Chiapas (Cayuela et al., 2006;<br />

Echeverría et al., 2007); and 2-6.7% in Selva Lacandona, also in Chiapas (Ortiz-Espejel &<br />

Toledo, 1998; de Jong et. al., 2000). Precisely, the states of Chiapas and Yucatan have<br />

registered the highest rate of forest conversion to grasslands and slash-and-burn cultivation<br />

over the past two decades, and Chiapas alone has contributed towards 12% of national<br />

deforestation during the period 1993-2007 (De Jong et al, 2010; Díaz-Gallegos et al., 2010).<br />

In Mexico, deforestation occurs because forests become converted to agriculture, livestock<br />

and urban areas. But also because logging activities fail to meet the requirements of forest<br />

management plans. All these processes result in the loss of forest goods and services<br />

(Lambin et al. 2003), and they contribute to ecosystem fragmentation (Ochoa-Gaona &<br />

González Espinosa, 2000; Cayuela et al., 2006), biological invasions (Hobbs, 2000),<br />

greenhouse gas emissions (Watson et al., 2000), biodiversity loss (Lugo et al., 1993), soil<br />

degradation (Lal, 2004) and water siltation (Sweeney et al., 2004).


334<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Deforestation is one of the key contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the<br />

atmosphere (IPCC, 2000; Canadell & Raupach, 2008). Between 2003 and 2008, GHG<br />

deforestation-related emissions in Chiapas were estimated to be 16,477 (±7,299) Gg<br />

CO2/year, while 414 Gg CO2–eq were attributed to forest fires during the same period.<br />

These emissions represent 23.5% of national land-use change related emissions over the<br />

same period (Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas, 2011). In Chiapas, deforestation processes<br />

have affected highland, cloud and tropical forests. These forests have decreased in favour of<br />

agriculture, pastures and secondary vegetation. The original areas of some of these forest<br />

types have been reduced by 50% (de Jong et al, 2010). In particular, tropical mountain cloud<br />

forests and mangroves have been threatened by commercial agriculture, and considerable<br />

endemic biodiversity has subsequently been lost (Hirales-Cota, 2010; Toledo-Aceves et al.,<br />

2011). The Selva Lacandona (Lacandon rainforest) is located in the southern region of the<br />

country next to Guatemala, and it has been severely deforested during the last 40 years. The<br />

rainforest area of Marques de Comillas lost 81,080 ha of tropical forests between 1986 and<br />

2005, which represents 48% of the original forest cover (Castillo-Santiago 2009).<br />

Deforestation and degradation have occurred despite the fact that a variety of policy tools<br />

and approaches have been developed by national and regional governments, as well as by<br />

civil organisations, in order to guarantee forest and biodiversity conservation, including<br />

people-oriented conservation areas; community-based sustainable resource use<br />

management approaches; technological innovations for improved forest and agricultural<br />

management practices; and payments for ecosystem services (PES) (Deininger & Minten,<br />

1999; Corbera, 2005; Cayuela et al, 2006). It is recognised that managed forests and<br />

agroforestry systems can contribute to conserve soil, regulate water flows, support<br />

biodiversity and sequester significant amounts of carbon by including timber-focused<br />

trees for durable products. Some of these land management systems can maintain biomass<br />

for longer, restore site capacity and increase economic benefits compared to a business-asusual<br />

scenario (Kotto-Same et al., 1997; De Jong et al., 2000; Albrecht & Kandji, 2003;<br />

Montagnini & Nair, 2004; Soto-Pinto et al., 2010). The evidence presented before, however,<br />

has demonstrated that most of these policy and project-based approaches have been far<br />

from successful, and have been unable to halt land-use change in the region as a whole.<br />

There are of course apparently successful experiences, which should help us to learn<br />

lessons and identify avenues for improving the design and effectiveness of existing<br />

policies and instruments. One of these, institutional development, aims to encourage and<br />

facilitate local inputs and experimentation, interaction and consultation of local actors<br />

among themselves and to interact with relevant external agents to increase opportunities<br />

for the poor; it has a crucial importance in territorial development (Evans, 2004; Schejtman<br />

and Berdegué, 2004).<br />

One of the latter experiences concerns the project being analysed in this chapter, which has<br />

been promoting agroforestry, reforestation and conservation activities for offsetting GHG<br />

emissions since 1994. The Scolel Té project has allowed carbon offsets to be sold through the<br />

voluntary market and will provide non-timber and timber products in the short, medium<br />

and long term. In the following sections, we examine the involvement in the project of three<br />

municipalities located in the northern-eastern tropical area of Chiapas, Mexico (i.e., Marqués<br />

de Comillas, Chilón and Salto de Agua) (Figure 1), and we discuss the potential of<br />

alternatives of avoided deforestation and agroforestry systems as well as institutional<br />

arrangements resulting from project development in these municipalities. The following<br />

section of the chapter describes the process of deforestation in Marqués de Comillas, a


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 335<br />

representative area of the state’s ongoing deforestation and degradation processes. The<br />

central part of the chapter highlights Scolel Te’s conservation and forest management<br />

approach in our selected municipalities, and it discusses the drivers and constraints for the<br />

successful realisation of environmental, economic and social benefits in the three selected<br />

cases. The last part of the chapter discusses the overall results in the context of evolving<br />

carbon forestry markets and the through the enhancement, conservation and sustainable<br />

management of forest stocks.<br />

Fig. 1. Study area in Chiapas, Mexico.<br />

2. The process of deforestation in Marqués de Comillas<br />

Marqués de Comillas is one of the four municipalities of La Selva Lacandona and it<br />

comprises a total area of 203,200 ha. In the last few four decades, this municipality showed<br />

one of the highest deforestation rates in Mexico. Between 1986 and 2005 it lost<br />

approximately 81,080 ha of tropical rainforest, which represents 48% of its original forest<br />

cover (Figure 2). This loss contributed to 1.5% of the total CO2 emissions from land use<br />

change in Mexico (Castillo-Santiago 2009).<br />

Settlements in La Selva Lacandona were promoted during 1970-1980, and they have been<br />

recognised as the main driver of deforestation in Marqués de Comillas. Population was<br />

relocated to resolve conflicts of land scarcity and social rebellion in other Mexican states.<br />

Consequently, land in Marques de Comillas, which was completely forested at the


336<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

beginning of the 1970s, was distributed in 37 ejidos 1 (Mariaca, 2002). The colonisation<br />

process was complemented by the construction of a main road, which allowed people and<br />

goods to flow between rural areas and the main cities of Tabasco and Chiapas (Harvey,<br />

1998). Additionally, public policy favoured land use change from forest to maize<br />

agriculture, thereby financing deforestation in the 1970s. The process began with forest<br />

logging, followed by the use of fire for the cultivation of maize during three or four years.<br />

Once fertility was decreased and the land was weeded, due to intense cultivation, the<br />

natural steps were to intensify land use, fallow the land or let the grasses grow. Importantly,<br />

forested land was considered “idle land”, and the process of deforestation was actually<br />

funded by government programs that encouraged cattle ranching. In 1978, the protected<br />

area of Montes Azules was established adjacent to Marques de Comillas, covering and area<br />

of 331,200 ha.<br />

Subsequently, from 1992 to 1998, in Selva Lacandona six protected areas were established,<br />

five of them managed by the State, and other communal, with a total area of 123.660 ha:<br />

Chankin Protected Area (12.184 ha), Bonampak Natural Monument (4.357 ha), Biosphere<br />

Reserve Lacan-Tun (61.873 ha), areas of wildlife protection Nahá (3.847 ha), Metzabok (3.368<br />

ha), Natural Monument Yaxchilan (2.621 ha), and by agreement of the Lacandon<br />

Community, the Communal Reserve of Sierra Cojolita with 35.410 ha (INE 2000).<br />

Fig. 2. Land-use changes from 1986 to 2005 in Marques de Comillas Chiapas, México.<br />

In Marqués de Comillas, crops, such as cardamom, cocoa, rice, vanilla and rubber, were<br />

promoted by public and private investments to diversify the agricultural system and to<br />

employ local people who mainly participated as labourers in the 1980s and 1990s. Most of<br />

these projects were unsuccessful, due to their continuous requirements of external inputs,<br />

particularly technical support and capital. Forest initiatives were discouraging as well. In<br />

1996, the Pilot Forest Plan was launched to promote timber extraction and establish the basis<br />

for a rational use of community forests. However, only few ejidos have maintained the<br />

deforestation rate under the regional average. More recently, other public initiatives have<br />

favoured the growth of oil palm for biofuels, which are rapidly growing in this<br />

1 Ejido is a particular form of land tenure in which the State has given the land to a group of people<br />

called “ejidatarios”. The general use of forest and water is regulated by federal laws; land sale and use<br />

are decisions of the owner, this last is locally monitored and regulated by The Public Assembly of the<br />

community.


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 337<br />

municipality, even at the expense of forests. Livestock has also gained ground. Livestock has<br />

very often represented the best economic option from the farmers’ point of view because it<br />

has a relatively stable national market and a low level of investment is required. Livestock is<br />

thus still the dominant activity in the area and it occupies most of the landscape in Marques<br />

de Comillas at present (Table 1).<br />

Type of vegetation Area (ha) Percentage<br />

Tropical rainforest 69,360 34<br />

Riparian forest 3,054 1<br />

Wetlands 3,387 2<br />

Secondary forest 16,544 8<br />

Secondary vegetation<br />

(shrubs and herbaceous lands)<br />

25,904 13<br />

Pastures for livestock 56,339 28<br />

Rainfed agriculture 24,324 12<br />

Human settlements 2,404 1<br />

Rivers 3,124 2<br />

Total 204,440 100<br />

Source: Castillo-Santiago, 2009<br />

Table 1. Land use in Marqués de Comillas (Chiapas, México).<br />

Livestock in Selva Lacandona has normally been characterised by its extensiveness, and it has<br />

been devoted mainly to grow calves that are fed with naturalised grasses of low nutritional<br />

value. Moreover, it has been characterised as having a low management level, high number of<br />

animals per land unity, low capital investments, poor infrastructure, scarce technical assistance<br />

and scarce financial support (Jiménez et al, 2008; Martínez & Ruiz de Oña, 2010). Table 2<br />

shows the main features of the livestock system in communities of Selva Lacandona. Most of<br />

the farmers (95%) have designed their systems to produce calves to sell them to intermediaries<br />

in the local and regional markets. The trees located in the pastures are mainly tropical forest<br />

remnant trees tolerated for shading cattle, including Blephariduim guatemalensis, Sabal<br />

mauritiformis, Vatairea lundellii, Guarea glabra, Albizia adinocephala, Bursera simaruba, Spondias<br />

mombin, and Swietenia macrophylla. Specific timber species, such as “popiste” (B. mexicanum)<br />

and guanacastle (Enterolobium cyclocarpum), are sometimes favoured with the purpose of being<br />

used as a lumber source in rural construction (local market or self-supply).<br />

Recently, several studies have highlighted the importance of silvopastoral systems and other<br />

agroforestry systems for conserving biodiversity and connecting countryside landscape with<br />

reserves (Harvey et al, 2006; Rice & Greenberg, 2004). Several institutions, including the<br />

Commission for Natural Protected Areas (CONANP), the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

(CBM) and the National Commission of Knowledge and Use of Diversity (CONABIO) have<br />

launched programs in Selva Lacandona, specifically in Marques de Comillas, to improve<br />

rural production and promote conservation. One of these initiatives is the Scolel Te’ project,<br />

which began in 1994 as a pilot experience in Chiapas and it is managed by the local<br />

organisation AMBIO cooperative. It originally involved a few dozens of farmers in the<br />

central highlands of the state and it has now grown to encompass more than 700<br />

participants and their families (3500 beneficiaries) in approximately 50 communities of<br />

Chiapas and the neighbouring states of Oaxaca and Tabasco. The project is built on a


338<br />

Characteristics of<br />

livestock<br />

production units<br />

La Siria,<br />

Ocosingo<br />

Ach lum Monte<br />

Libano,<br />

Ocosingo<br />

Amatitlan,<br />

Maravilla<br />

Tenejapa<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

La Corona, Marques<br />

de Comillas<br />

Land use type Ejido Ejido Ejido Ejido<br />

Ethnic group Tseltal Tseltal Chol and<br />

Mestizo<br />

Mestizo<br />

Altitude (m a.s.l.) 150-200 300 - 500 275 - 590 75 – 125<br />

Land use Maize<br />

Maize<br />

Maize<br />

Maize agriculture<br />

agriculture, agriculture agriculture Livestock<br />

Fruits,<br />

Livestock Livestock Forestry<br />

Livestock<br />

Forestry<br />

Forestry PES-Carbon<br />

Average land<br />

area (ha/family)<br />

15 20 10 45<br />

Pasture area for<br />

cattle grazing<br />

(ha)<br />

10 15 5 25<br />

Stocking rate<br />

AU/ha<br />

Management<br />

system<br />

Product<br />

destination<br />

(mainly meat)<br />

Forage trees on<br />

pasture grazing<br />

areas<br />

1.9 2.1 1.5 2.7<br />

Livestock with<br />

improved<br />

pastures<br />

(Brachiaria<br />

brizantha, B<br />

humidicola).<br />

Rotations<br />

without<br />

technical<br />

assistance<br />

No supplement.<br />

Local market<br />

consumption<br />

G. sepium,<br />

Parmentiera<br />

aculeata,<br />

Brosimum<br />

allicastrum,<br />

Guazuma<br />

ulmifolia, Leucaena<br />

leuucocephala<br />

Livestock with<br />

native grasses<br />

and “estrella”<br />

grass (Cynodon<br />

niemufensis).<br />

Without<br />

technical<br />

assistance and<br />

financial<br />

support.<br />

Breeding and<br />

sales of young<br />

calves<br />

Local market<br />

consumption<br />

Whiteringia<br />

meiantha, Thitonia<br />

diversifolia, G.<br />

sepium, G.<br />

ulmifolia,<br />

Eupatorium<br />

morifolium<br />

Livestock with<br />

forest fallow<br />

grazing, and<br />

crop residues<br />

(maize stubbles)<br />

Local market<br />

consumption<br />

G. ulmifolia,<br />

Diphysa<br />

americana,<br />

Spondias mombin,<br />

Bahuinia herrerae<br />

Livestock on pastures<br />

with dispersed trees,<br />

live fences, and<br />

pastures with forest<br />

patches. Improved<br />

pastures (B.<br />

decumbens, B.<br />

humidicola,<br />

Andropogon gayanus).<br />

Growing and sale of<br />

calves recently wean<br />

Local and regional<br />

market consumption<br />

G. sepium, Cecropia<br />

obtusifolia, Erythrina sp,<br />

L. leucocephala, P.<br />

aculeata<br />

Table 2. Socio-technical characteristics of livestock in four communities in Selva Lacandona<br />

(Chiapas, México).


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 339<br />

participatory method that identifies rural development and forest management opportunities<br />

and constraints of each involved farmer and community. Subsequently, it helps farmers and<br />

communities to select and establish trees on individual or collective lands according to their<br />

preferences, providing technical support and paying participants for the provision of carbon<br />

offsets to national and mostly international buyers (Corbera 2010; Ruiz de Oña, 2011). Over<br />

time, the project has become a global landmark for the development of community-based<br />

payments for ecosystem services, and it has created its own design and implementation<br />

standard (www.planvivo.org). This approach has been extended to other similar projects in<br />

Uganda, Mozambique, Malawi and Cameroon<br />

3. Avoiding deforestation in La Corona, Marqués de Comillas<br />

In Ejido La Corona, a previous study estimated that 305 ha of forested land would have to<br />

be lost for agriculture purposes, as a baseline scenario during the period 2004-2009<br />

(Quechulpa, et al., 2010). With the support of the AMBIO cooperative and financial support<br />

from Pro-Árbol (i.e., a governmental PES program developed by Mexico’s National Forest<br />

Commission (CONAFOR) a participatory planning method was developed to design<br />

interventions for avoiding deforestation and increasing tree cover in deforested land.<br />

Concurrent financial resources were allocated from several programs, including Scolel Te,<br />

the Mexican Fund for Nature Conservation (FMCN) and Mesoamerican Biological Corridor<br />

(CBM). Financial resources were aimed to reduce pressure on forest land to avoid land-use<br />

change and to intensify cattle raising activities.<br />

The following two approaches were suggested by community members and selected for<br />

project development: 1) management of secondary vegetation and forest conservation and 2)<br />

establishment of agrosilvopastoral and agroforestry systems in open and grazing areas. As a<br />

result, secondary vegetation was managed by pruning and thinning trees to eliminate<br />

competition and favour growth of the most commercially valuable species. Activities for<br />

forest conservation included the opening and maintenance of 22 km of fire protection rifts,<br />

acquiring equipment for fires, combating brigades trained for fire control, supervising and<br />

regulating agricultural burns. Communal forest conservation incorporated a wider vision of<br />

the territory and collective agreements related to resource access into the working plan,<br />

thereby establishing rules and monitoring to regulate land use change according to the plan.<br />

The establishment of 45.5 km of live fences was carried out in accordance to the work plan<br />

(Figure 3) using “cocoite” forage trees (G. sepium) and other timber species, such as Tabebuia<br />

rosea, T. guayacan, C. odorata, S. macrophylla and Pachira aquatica. All forage trees were native<br />

species produced in communal nurseries. Other activities included the use of forage grasses<br />

such as Brachiaria, the promotion of cattle-feed supplements with multi-nutritional blocks,<br />

improvement of cattle breeds, establishment of livestock infrastructure, establishment of<br />

technical training and creation of a farmer-to-farmer exchange system (Ambio Cooperative,<br />

2010). In parallel, other projects particularly targeted towards women, such as the<br />

substitution of traditional open stoves by fuel wood-saving stoves, improvement of house<br />

conditions and improvement of other communal infrastructure, were also launched.<br />

In the first five years of the project, all of these activities resulted in 179 ha of prevented<br />

deforestation out of the 305 ha previously estimated to be lost, which translated in reduced<br />

CO2 emissions from land-use change. According to inventories from permanent plots, 407 ha<br />

of passively restored secondary forests accumulated biomass with a rate of 4.4 ton ha -1 year -1


340<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

(approximately 3000 ton of CO2 per year), and it was estimated that the establishment of live<br />

fences fixed approximately 3200 tonnes of CO2. Other intangible benefits included the<br />

organisation of farmers for fire prevention; the organisation and training of brigades for<br />

carrying out forest inventories; and the improvement of productive systems. Above all, the<br />

recognition that forests may contribute to environmental and socioeconomic direct benefits<br />

was one of the main gains resulting from the project.<br />

Fig. 3. Participatory planning for designing forestry and agroforestry interventions in La<br />

Corona and Marques de Comillas in Chiapas, Mexico.


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 341<br />

As a result of this management, Ejido La Corona, with a total area of 2254 ha, conserves 68%<br />

of the total rain forest (1530 ha), which includes primary and old secondary tropical rain<br />

forests. Nonetheless, livestock (528 ha), agriculture (177 ha) and urbanisation (20 ha) coexist<br />

with forests and the biological reserve, and these combined areas support 292 people<br />

(Quechulpa 2010).<br />

Subsequent studies have evaluated the performance of the systems established by producers<br />

in La Corona. An example is shown in Table 3, where the carbon components of pastures<br />

with and without trees are presented.<br />

Carbon components Pasture in Pasture with Pasture with<br />

monoculture live fences dispersed trees<br />

Trees (Mg C ha-1) 0.00 7.6 4.23<br />

Herbs (including grasses Mg C ha-1) 1.33 0.91 0.64<br />

Total roots (fine and coarse Mg C ha-1) 0.66 1.88 1.12<br />

Live biomass (Mg C ha-1) 1.99 10.4 5.99<br />

Soil organic matter 0-40cm (Mg C ha-1) 60.62 66.68 76.89<br />

Total carbon (Mg C ha-1) 64.62 87.5 88.89<br />

Source: modified from Aguilar-Argüello, 2007.<br />

Table 3. Carbon stocks in different components of monoculture pastures, live fences and<br />

dispersed trees in pastures in La Corona and Reforma Agraria in Chiapas (Mg C ha-1). 4. Agroforestry in Chilón and Salto de Agua, Chiapas<br />

Study communities of these municipalities are located in Chiapas tropical zone. Salto de<br />

Agua is located approximately 200 m a.s.l., and it has a warm and humid climate. In<br />

addition, Salto de Agua has a tropical rainforest. Meanwhile, Chilón is located in the<br />

intermediate tropical zone between 700 and 900 m a.s.l. It has a warm climate and abundant<br />

summer rains. Chilón has also a tropical rainforest, and the main soil types in this area are<br />

Regosols, Leptosols, and Cambisols (INEGI 1984; Soto-Pinto et al., 2010). Land is devoted<br />

mainly to agriculture, which is based on maize cultivation in both municipalities. While in<br />

Salto de Agua, maize cultivation is the key commercial and subsistence crop, Chilón farmers<br />

cultivate coffee as the main source of income. In both “ejidos”, farmers organise around<br />

small activity groups for establishing agroforestry systems. In Chilón, farmers established<br />

maize associated to trees (Taungya rotational systems), improved fallows and shaded coffee<br />

systems; while farmers in Salto de Agua established taungya systems converted finally to<br />

silvopastoral systems. Improved fallow consists of enriching fallow lands with secondary<br />

vegetation with timber trees, so far as the latter are planted during the first five years of the<br />

fallow period. Taungya, in turn, consists of enriching maize cultivated plots with timber<br />

trees in a rotational pattern; and coffee systems were enriched with timber trees in<br />

association to other variety of previously existing native trees as shading cover. The project<br />

Scolel Té has contributed to organizing agroforestry practices, training and monitoring.<br />

Previous evaluations by El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR) have shown that<br />

agroforestry systems provide multiple environmental services and can increase<br />

productivity, land and labour worth in relation to conventional land uses, such as extensive<br />

cattle farming and maize crops without trees (Soto-Pinto et al, 2010; Soto-Pinto, submitted).<br />

Coffee cultivation under the shade of trees conserves at least 40% of the total woody plant


342<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

diversity in scarce neighbouring forests (Soto-Pinto et al, 2000; Romero-Alvarado et al, 2002;<br />

Peeters et al, 2003). Organic coffee cultivation translates into a higher carbon content in the<br />

upper soil layer (0-30 cm) than non-organic coffee systems, being able to store between 129.8<br />

and 215.6 Mg C ha -1 in their components, including soil C (Soto-Pinto et al., 2010). However,<br />

the amount of aboveground biomass depends on the structure and composition of shade<br />

vegetation (Table 4). Economic analyses comparing conventional coffee with and without<br />

enrichment of timber trees and PES and organic coffee with timber trees and PES have<br />

shown positive benefit/cost ratios, as follows: 0.8, 1.2 and 1.8 for conventional management,<br />

conventional management enriched with timber trees, and organic coffee plus carbon<br />

sequestration and timber, respectively (Table 5).<br />

Carbon components Natural traditional<br />

polyculture coffee<br />

Natural traditional Organic traditional<br />

polyculture coffee polyculture coffee<br />

enriched with timber enriched with timber<br />

trees<br />

trees<br />

Adult trees (≥10cm) 17.02±3.32 27.3±4.79 37.89±5.17<br />

Tree saplings (


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 343<br />

Improved fallows have demonstrated to be an adequate alternative to slash-and-burn<br />

agriculture, due to their capacity to increase biomass, productivity, economic value,<br />

complexity, carbon and diversity (Roncal 2007; Soto-Pinto et al., submitted). Tables 6 and 7<br />

show structural and functional variables of these systems in the region. Results of these<br />

evaluations show that these systems may contribute to sedentarise the maize system,<br />

increase economic value and avoid deforestation while diversifying non-timber and timber<br />

related products.<br />

Both systems have shown their multifunctionality for improving productivity and restoring<br />

site features, environmental conditions and livelihood conditions (Soto-Pinto et al.,<br />

Submitted).<br />

Land use systems<br />

Adult tree<br />

density<br />

(trees ha-1)<br />

Tree sapling<br />

density<br />

(100m2)<br />

Tree<br />

Height (m)<br />

Tree<br />

Diameter<br />

(cm)<br />

Taungya system 9-13years 520±218 31.9±19.0 8.8±1.4 16.2±3.9<br />

Improved Fallow at 9th year 623.3±106.3 4800±2361.0 8.26±1.3 16.88±3.16<br />

Traditional Fallow >30 years 463.8±191.8 3616.7±2700 7.4±1.3 17.7±3.47<br />

Inga-shaded organic coffee >10<br />

years<br />

79.3±79.3 25.1±7.5 5.6±1.0 19.2±13.0<br />

Polyculture-shaded organic<br />

coffee >10 years<br />

115.0±115.0 22.8±6.9 7.3±4.1 15.0±9.9<br />

Polyculture-shaded non organic<br />

coffee >10 years<br />

206.3±180.0 21.5±7.5 6.5±3.5 15.4±10.2<br />

Pasture with dispersed trees >10<br />

years<br />

20.0±10.0 112.0±16.0 6.1±3.4 14.8±4.5<br />

Pasture with live fences >10<br />

years<br />

56.0±37.3 116.0±68.7 4.5±1.5 10.3±4.5<br />

Pasture in monoculture >10 years 0 0 0 0<br />

Continuous maize 4-7 years 210.0±217.0 66.6±57.7 2.1±0.42 7.17±2.2<br />

Source: Aguilar-Argüello 2007; Roncal –García et al., 2007; Aguirre 2006; Soto-Pinto et al. 2010; Soto-<br />

Pinto et al. submitted; and other original data<br />

Table 6. Structural variables of agroforestry systems in Selva Lacandona (Mexico).<br />

In Salto de Agua and Chilón the decisions on land use are taken individually, often under<br />

the consensus of the family and the work group. The impact seems to be centered at the plot<br />

level. However the impact on the territory has not been evaluated.<br />

In each community, regional and local technicians act as training guides. Local decisions are<br />

taken individually or by group. Regional and state-level assemblies of technicians discuss,<br />

analyse problems, and propose solutions, new projects and financial supports to resolve<br />

specific problems. Civil and academic organizations and government dependencies<br />

accompany the process offering punctual technical assistance to resolve specific questions<br />

and financial support. Academy plays an important role in knowledge management,<br />

offering training and developing human resources. All of the sectors are involved in<br />

thematic networks contributing to the building of a public policy in the thematic of forestry<br />

programs, PES and territorial developing, among other issues.


344<br />

Land use systems<br />

Aboveground<br />

tree biomass<br />

(Mg ha-1)<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Soil Carbon 0-<br />

30cm in depth<br />

(Mg C ha-1)<br />

Tree Species<br />

Richness<br />

(number of<br />

species)<br />

Taungya system 9-13years 44.4±25.7 104.7±30.1 3.4±2.3 (500m2) Improved Fallow at 9th year 164.3±65.4 88.85±4.7 15.8±3.9 (1000m2) Traditional Fallow >30 years 109.35±66.7 120.4±7.0 19.7±3.8 (1000m2) Inga-shaded organic coffee >10 years 34.1±17.6 75.83±28.6 5.6±2.9 (1000m2)<br />

Polyculture-shaded organic coffee >10<br />

years<br />

75.8±27.4 131.13±23.4 15.7±3.3 (1000m2)<br />

Polyculture-shaded non organic coffee<br />

>10 years<br />

54.6±25.9 101.13±27.9 8.0±3.3 (1000m2)<br />

Pasture with dispersed trees >10 years 8.5±6.0 46.4±13.0 2.6±2.6<br />

Pasture with live fences >10 years 15.2±10.7 40.5±9.8 1±0<br />

Pasture in monoculture >10 years 0 50.2±14.6 0<br />

Continuous maize 4-7 years 4.38±3.62 115.0±12.3 14.0±4.8 (1000m2)<br />

Source: Aguilar-Argüello 2007; Roncal –García et al., 2007; Aguirre 2006; Soto-Pinto et al. 2010; Soto-<br />

Pinto et al. submitted; and other original data<br />

Table 7. Functional variables of agroforestry systems in Selva Lacandona (Chiapas).<br />

5. Discussion<br />

In some places traditional communities have managed their resources sustainably for long<br />

time, even better than in many protected areas managed by the State, especially in Latin<br />

America (Bray et al., 2008; Porter-Bolland, et al., In Press). However, in the last years the<br />

effects of public policy, colonization process and urban development, among other land use<br />

change drivers led to high deforestation rates in sites which until four decades before were<br />

completely forested, this is the case of Selva Lacandona in Mexico where Marques de<br />

Comillas is a referent.<br />

Enriched shaded coffee, alternative rotational and silvopastoral systems have demonstrated<br />

benefits in the topics of food production, biodiversity and economy of livelihoods. Results<br />

demonstrate the value of agroforestry systems as a potential strategy for tree cover recovery<br />

and carbon sequestration (Haile et al., 2008; Nair et al., 2010; Soto-Pinto et al., 2010) and<br />

suggest that adequate planning, incentives and capacity-building efforts can lead to better<br />

conservation practices (Berkes, 2007). In Ejidos La Corona and communities in Chilón and<br />

Salto de Agua people have improved their local organisational activities, either in groups or<br />

collectively through preventing deforestation; intensifying the agriculture process;<br />

reforesting the deforested and open areas; controlling fire; acquiring new abilities; creating<br />

norms, sanctions, work plans, and social rearrangements; and reinforcing old capacities for<br />

developing a forest culture as a part of a new institutional development and good<br />

governance (Evans 2004; Corbera, 2005, 2010). All this, coupled with the accompaniment of<br />

the civil society and academic institutions, and the involvement of government in a network<br />

of ecosystem services has been key in order to begin a governance development (Ruiz de<br />

Oña et al., 2011). However, the scaling up of this process is a challenge since it represents a<br />

greater organizational complexity and negotiation, a matter of governance (Swiderska et al.,<br />

2008).


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 345<br />

In Marques de Comillas collective organization and decisions can impact broad and<br />

decisively on the territory in the short term, while in Chilón and Salto de Agua decisions<br />

taken by individuals or groups may be slower than collective decisions. Future studies on<br />

social resilience on both types of patterns should be of great importance. The lesson gained<br />

in this experience is that public programs must consider community priorities based on an<br />

integral regional vision, environmental education, strengthening of local capabilities and<br />

organisation. As a whole, public priorities may be a better appropriation and adaptation of<br />

programs in a new model of territorial development by considering institutional<br />

arrangements (Merino and Warnholtz, 2005). Farmers are the leading experts regarding<br />

their context and livelihood conditions and may or may not adopt and adapt programs that<br />

involve a territorial vision. The intense participation of communities may allow better<br />

monitoring, especially when these programs are integrated into their own communitymanagement<br />

plans (Franzel and Scherr, 2002).<br />

Territorial participatory planning of agroforestry and restoration systems, in addition to the<br />

institutional development have demonstrated their capacity to benefit environment,<br />

farmer’s livelihoods and social capital, through their contribution to increase productivity,<br />

complexity, diversity, economic value, organization capacities and knowledge, which as a<br />

whole may contribute to avoid deforestation (Alburquerque, 2002; Bray, 2008; Swiderska et<br />

al., 2008). However, other products, service, process and management innovations are<br />

required to have a broader menu of options for farming systems and livelihoods to ensure<br />

the permanence of forest systems in a competitive context. Some of the needs to be resolved<br />

in order to conceive this process as a territorial development are: the best practices to<br />

achieve food self-sufficiency, development of market chains, education, training,<br />

infrastructure, financial support, policy arrangements and skills of competitiveness for<br />

production systems (Alburquerque, 2002; Ruiz de Oña et al., 2011). An integration of an<br />

agroecological matrix which enables agricultural production and natural resource<br />

conservation and a new political vision may help facilitate social and environmental<br />

synergies in rural areas (Perfecto and Vandermeer, 2010)<br />

Although the experience run by the project Scolel te’ in Marqués de Comillas is not precisely<br />

REDD+, may offer a set of lessons learned about the conditions required for a good<br />

management for reducing deforestation. Some elements which need to be considered in order<br />

to contribute to the design of PES programs are the following: 1) technology adaptation, 2)<br />

ordering of land use with a territorial development vision, 3) broad participation of all<br />

stakeholders, 4) institutional development at local, regional levels and, 5) involvement in<br />

networks to launch processes of governance for the management of an adequate public policy<br />

of PES. Although these systems may contribute to avoiding deforestation, their potential to<br />

become part of REDD programs need to be better discussed since the relationship among<br />

markets and actors’ rights and duties, in addition to the uncertainty regarding the factors<br />

influencing effectiveness on deforestation is unclear (Coad et al., 2008).<br />

In Chiapas, a process of institutional development around the issue of PES is emerging. In the<br />

last years groups working on ecosystem services (State Group of Ecosystem Services, GESE by<br />

its acronyms in Spanish) and deforestation and degradation (REDD) have matured in the state<br />

of Chiapas; representatives of the “Camara de Diputados y Senadores del Estado de Chiapas”<br />

(State House of Representatives and Senate) have approved the Law for Mitigation and<br />

Adaptation to Climate Change in the State; meanwhile, a group of research institutions and<br />

organizations of the civil society carry out an effort of monitoring, reporting and verification


346<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

(MRV) in rural communities as a basis for a REDD planning in Chiapas. Moreover, the<br />

Government of the States of Chiapas and Campeche has recently signed an agreement with<br />

Acre Brazil and the Government of California through The Governors’ Climate and Forests<br />

Task Force (GCF) for REDD + (http://tropicalforestgroup.blogspot.com/2010/11/text-of-cachiapas-acre-mou-on-redd.html)<br />

with the aim to “developing a common subnational REDD+<br />

framework or patform for adoption and implementtion in GCF states and provinces” and “to<br />

building databases, developing options for linkage arrangements for getting financial support,<br />

technical assistance, capacity building, and advancing stakeholder involvement”<br />

(http://www.gcftaskforce.org). For its part, the Chiapas Government has allocated funds from<br />

the vehicle ownership tax payment to farmers focused on a Biodiversity Hotspot, the Selva<br />

Lacandona (Lacandon Community). This region has been widely supported by conservation<br />

projects, but from the point of view of other authors it lacks of organizational conditions for<br />

effective management of forest carbon (Castillo-Santiago et al 2009).<br />

At the national level, CONAFOR (Forestry National Comission) has convened a technical<br />

advisory board (Consejo Tecnico Consultivo CTC) aimed to “promote and deliver<br />

recommendations to the government institutions in order to influence the building of a<br />

functional mechanism for designing and implementing REDD+ in Mexico, guarantig the<br />

transference and maximization of environmental and social benefits”<br />

(http://www.reddmexico.org). However, groups of civil society organizations drew<br />

attention to the topic of indigenous peoples' rights. Hence, much effort is still needed to<br />

really get to have a shared vision.<br />

Forest alternatives will only be adopted by farmers if they respond to expressed needs of<br />

population, reduce risks, alleviate constraints, and increase productivity. Deforestation<br />

process seems to take its course if drivers persist (Cortina et al., in press). Farmers will be<br />

interested since they participate and design innovations from the beginning of the project<br />

and also if the initiatives constitute a good deal from the set of alternatives offered in the<br />

territory (Franzel & Scherr, 2002; Merino & Warnholtz, 2005; Bray, 2008). Mere academic<br />

exercises of land use ordering may be at risk of abandonment if local priorities are left out,<br />

so that the participation of farmers (men and women) in planning, designing and applying<br />

technology, norms, rules and sanctions among other local institutions must be established<br />

with broad participation of all of the actors involved.<br />

6. Acknowledgments<br />

We would like to thank CONACYT for financial support (projects SEP-2004-C01-46244 and<br />

FORDECYT 116306), and we would also like to thank El Colegio de la Frontera Sur<br />

(ECOSUR), Esteve Corbera from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cooperative<br />

Ambio, and anonymous reviewers. Sandra Roncal, Cecilia Armijo, Victor Aguilar Argûello<br />

and Carlos Mario Aguirre helped for fieldwork.<br />

7. References<br />

Aguilar-Argüello V.H. (2007). Almacenamiento de carbono en sistemas de pasturas en<br />

monocultivo y silvopastoriles, en dos comunidades de la Selva Lacandona,<br />

Chiapas, México. MSc Thesis. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Centro de<br />

Agroforestería para el Desarrollo Sustentable, Chapingo Edo. Mexico, 89p.


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 347<br />

Aguirre D.C.M. (2006). Servicios ambientales: Captura de carbono en sistemas de café bajo<br />

sombra en Chiapas, México. MSc Thesis. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Centro<br />

de Agroforestería para el Desarrollo Sustentable, Chapingo Edo. Mexico, 84p.<br />

Albrecht A., S.T. Kandji. (2003). Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems.<br />

Agriculture, Ecosystems and <strong>Environment</strong> 99: 15–27.<br />

Alburquerque L.F. (2002). Guia para agentes. Desarrollo economico territorial. Instituto de<br />

Desarrollo Regional. Fundación Universitaria. Sevilla Spain, 214 p.<br />

Berkes F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. PNAS 104 (39): 15188-<br />

15193.<br />

Bocco G., M. Mendoza, O. Masera. (2001). La dinámica del cambio de uso del suelo en<br />

Michoacán. Una propuesta metodológica para el estudio de los procesos de<br />

deforestación. Investigaciones Geográficas. Boletín del Instituto de Geografía de la<br />

UNAM 44:18-38.<br />

Bray D.B., E. Duran, V.H. Ramos, J.F. Mas, A. Velazquez, R.B. McNab, D. Barry, J.<br />

racachowsky. 2008. Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected áreas<br />

in the maya forests. Ecology and Society 13(2): 56<br />

Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science<br />

320(5882):1456–1457.<br />

Castillo-Santiago, M.A., (2009). Análisis con imágenes satelitales de los recursos forestales en<br />

el trópico húmedo de Chiapas. Un estudio de caso en Marqués de Comillas. Tesis<br />

de doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.<br />

123 p.<br />

Cayuela L., J. M. Benayas, C. Echeverria. (2006). Clearance and fragmentation of tropical<br />

montane forests in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico (1975–2000). Forest Ecology<br />

and Management 226, 208–218.<br />

Coad, L., Campbell, A., Clark, S., Bolt, K., Roe, D., Miles, L. (2008). Protecting the future:<br />

Carbon, forests, protected areas and locallivelihoods. Revised May 2008. UNEP World<br />

Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.<br />

Corbera E. (2005). Bringing development into carbon forestry markets: Challenges and<br />

outcomes of small-scale carbon forestry activities in Mexico. In: D. Murdiyarso y H.<br />

Herawati.pp. 42-56. Carbon forestry: ¿who will benefit? CIFOR (Center for Intnal.<br />

Forestry Res.), Bogor, Indonesia.<br />

Corbera E. (2010). Mexico’s PES-carbon programme: a preliminary assessment and impacts<br />

on rural livelihoods. In: L. Tacconi, S. Maharty and H. Sulch, 54-81pp. Payments for<br />

environmental services, forest conservation and climate change. Edmund Elgar,<br />

Cheltenham UK.<br />

Cortina V.S., H. Plascencia, R. Vaca, G. Schroth, Y. Zepeda, L. Soto-Pinto. Resolving the<br />

conflict between ecosystem protection and land use in protected areas of the Sierra<br />

Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. <strong>Environment</strong>al Management. In Press.<br />

de Jong B.H., Ochoa S, Cairns MA. (2000). Carbon flux and patterns of land-use/land-cover<br />

change in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. Ambio 29(8):504–511.<br />

de Jong B.H., V. Maldonado, F. Rojas G., M. Olguín A., V. de la Cruz A., F. Paz P., G.<br />

Jiménez Ferrer, M. A. Castillo-Santiago. (2010). Sector uso del suelo, cambio de uso<br />

de suelo y silvicultura del inventario estatal de gases de efecto invernadero del<br />

Estado de Chiapas. Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas<br />

México. 71p.<br />

Deininger K.W., B. Minten. (1999). Poverty, Policies, and Deforestation: The Case of Mexico.<br />

Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47 (2):313-344.


348<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Díaz-Gallegos J.R., J.F. Mas, A. Velázquez. (2010). Trends of tropical deforestation in<br />

Southeast Mexico. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 31 (2): 180-196.<br />

Echeverría C., L. Cayuela, R.H. Manson, D.A. Coomes, A. Lara, J.M. Rey-Benayas, A.C.<br />

Newton. (2007). Spatial and temporal patterns of forest loss and fragmentation in<br />

Mexico and Chile. In: A.C. Newton (Ed.) pp. 14-42. Biodiversity and conservation<br />

in fragmented forest landscapes. CABI, Oxford UK.<br />

Evans P. (2004). Development as institutional change: the pitfalls of monocropping and the<br />

potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development. 38<br />

(4): 30-52.<br />

FAO (2007). Paying Farmers for <strong>Environment</strong>al Services, Map 2, page 18. Rome.<br />

FAO (2010). Global forest resources assessment. (2010). Main report. Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations. FAO Forestry Paper 163. Rome Italy, 340p.<br />

Franzel S., S.J. Scherr. (2002). Trees on the farm. Assessing the adoption potential of<br />

agroforestry practices in Africa. CABI. New York, 185p.<br />

Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. (2011). Inventario de gases efecto invernadero del estado<br />

de Chiapas.<br />

http://www.cambioclimaticochiapas.org/portal/descargas/igei/resumen_igei.pdf<br />

Haile S., P.K.R. nair, V.D. Nair. (2008). Carbon storage of different soil-size fractions in<br />

Florida silvopastoral systems. J. Environ. Qual. 37: 1789-1797<br />

Harvey C.A., A. Medina, D. Merlos S., S. Vilchez, B. Hernández, J.C. Saez, J.M. Maes, F.<br />

Casnoves, F.L. Sinclair. (2006). Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree<br />

cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Applications 16 (5): 1986-1999.<br />

Harvey, N. (1998). El fin del “desarrollo” en Marqués de Comillas: discurso y poder en el<br />

último rincón de la Selva lacandona. In: Reyes R., M.E., Moguel, R., y van der Haar,<br />

G. (cords.), Espacios disputados: transformaciones rurales en Chiapas, Universidad<br />

Autónoma Metropolitana y El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, México.<br />

Hirales-Cota M., J. Espinoza-Avalos, B. Schmook, A. Ruiz-Luna, R. Ramos-Reyes. (2010).<br />

Drivers of mangrove deforestation in Mahahual-Xcalak, Quintana Roo, southeast<br />

Mexico Ciencias Marinas 36 (2):147-159.<br />

Hobbs R.J. (2000). Land use changes and invassions. In Mooney H. A. and R.J. Hobbs (Eds.).<br />

Pp. 55-64. Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington DC.<br />

INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e informática). (1984.) Carta de uso del<br />

suelo y vegetación 1:25000. Maps E 15–8, E 15–11. Instituto Nacional de Estadística<br />

e Informática, Aguascalientes, México.<br />

INE (Instituto Nacional de Ecología). 2000. Programa de manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera<br />

Montes Azules. México. 256 p.<br />

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change). (2000). Intergovernmental Panel for<br />

Climate Change special report on land use, land-use change and forestry. Special<br />

Report. IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA<br />

(http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_sr/).<br />

Jiménez-Ferrer G., Aguilar AV., Soto-Pinto L. (2008). Livestock and carbon sequestration in<br />

the Lacandon rainforest, Chiapas México. In : Livestock and Global Climate<br />

Change. BSAS,Cambridge Press, UK, 195-197.<br />

Klooster D. (2000). Beyond deforestation: the social context of forest change in two<br />

indigenous communities in Highland Mexico. Yearbook, Conference of Latin<br />

Americanists Geographers, 26: 47-59.


Agroforestry Systems and Local<br />

Institutional Development for Preventing Deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico 349<br />

Kotto-Same J, Woomer PL, Appolinaire M, Louis Z. (1997). Carbon dynamics in slash-andburn<br />

agriculture and land use alternatives of the humid forest zone in Cameroon.<br />

Agric Ecosyst Environ 65:245–256<br />

Lal R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123 (1-2): 1-22.<br />

Lambin E.F., B. L. Turner, H. J. Geist, S. B. Agbola, A. Angelsen, J. W. Bruce, O. T. Coomes,<br />

R. Dirzo, G. Fischer, C. Folke, P. S. George, K. Homewood, J. Imbernon, R.<br />

Leemans, X. Li, E. F. Moran, M. Mortimore, P. S. Ramakrishnan, J. F. Richards, H.<br />

Skånes, W. Steffen, G. D. Stone, U. Svedin, T.A. Veldkamp, C. Vogel and J. Xu.<br />

(2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths.<br />

Global <strong>Environment</strong>al Change, Vol. 11 (4): 261-269.<br />

Lugo E, J. A. Parrotta, S. Brown. (1993). Loss in species caused by tropical deforestation and<br />

their recovery through management. Ambio 22 (2/3): 106-109.<br />

Maass S.F., H.H. Regil G., J. A. Ordoñez. (2006). Dinámica de población-recuperación de las<br />

zonas forestadas en el Parque Nacional Nevado de Toluca. Madera y Bosques<br />

12(1):17-28<br />

Mariaca, R. (2002). Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas: procesos de inmigración y adaptabilidad<br />

en el trópico cálido húmedo de México. Tesis de Doctorado en Antropología Social,<br />

Universidad Iberoamericana. 396 p.<br />

Martínez M.P. y C. Ruiz de Oña P. (2010). Planeación comunitaria empleando la<br />

herramienta plan vivo. Consultancy Report to Corrredor Biológico Mesoamericano.<br />

San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, México 43p.<br />

Merino-Pérez, L., G. Segura-Warnholtz. (2005). Las políticas forestales y de conservación y<br />

sus impactos en las comunidades forestales en México. In: Bray, D. B., L. Merino-<br />

Pérez, D. Barry (Eds), pp. 49-70. The Community forests of Mexico: managing for<br />

sustainable landscapes. University of Texas Press. Austin.<br />

Montagnini F., P. K. R. Nair. (2004). Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental<br />

benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 61: 281–295, 2004.<br />

Nair P.K.R., V.D. Nair, B. M. Kumar, J.M. Showatter. 2010. Carbon sequestration in<br />

agroforestry systems. Advances in agrofomy 108:237-307.<br />

Ochoa-Gaona, S., González-Espinosa, M. (2000). Land use and deforestation in the<br />

highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Appl. Geogr. 20, 17–42.<br />

Ortiz-Espejel B. y V.M. Toledo. (1998). Tendencias en la deforestación de la Selva Lacandona<br />

(Chiapas Mexico): el caso de Las Cañadas. Interciencia 23(6): 318-327.<br />

Peeters l.Y.K, L. Soto-Pinto, H. Perales, G. Montoya, M. Ishiki. (2003). Coffee production,<br />

timber and firewood in Sothern México. Agric. Ecosyst. and Environmt 95 (2-<br />

3):481-493<br />

Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer. 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the landsparing/agriculture<br />

intensification model. PNAS 107 (13): 5786-5791.<br />

Porter-Bolland L., E. A. Ellis, M. R. Guariguata, I-Ruiz-Mallén, S. Negrete-yankelevich, V.<br />

Reyes-García. 2011. Community managed forest and forest protected areas: an<br />

assesment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecology and<br />

Management. In Press.<br />

Quechulpa, S., Castillo-Santiago, M.A., Esquivel, E., Hernández, M.A., Trujillo, J.M. (2010).<br />

Captura y reducción de emisiones de bióxido de carbono en el ejido La Corona,<br />

municipio de Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. Informe para La Comisión Nacional<br />

Forestal, México. 33 p.<br />

Reyes-Hernández H., S. Cortina-Villar, H. perales-Rivera, E. Kauffer-Michel, J,M. Pat<br />

Fernandez. (2003). Efecto de los subsidios agropecuarios y apoyos gubernamentales


350<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

sobre la deforestación durante el período 1990-2000 en la región de Calakmul,<br />

Campeche, México. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografia,<br />

UNAM 51: 88-106.<br />

Rice R., R. Greenberg. (2004). Silvopastoral systems and socioeconomic benefits and<br />

migratory bird conservation. In: Schroth G., G.A.B. da Fonseca, C. Harvey, C.<br />

Gascon, H.L. Vasconcelos, A.N. Izac (Eds). Agroforestry and biodiversity.<br />

Conservation in tropical landscapes pp. 453-472. Island Press, Washington D.C.<br />

Romero-Alvarado, Y., L. Soto-Pinto, L.E. García-Barrios y J. F. Barrera Gaytán. (2002). Coffee<br />

yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. Vs. multiple species in<br />

Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforestry Systems, 54:215-224.<br />

Roncal G. S. (2007). Almacenamiento de carbono en sistemas agroforestales en Chiapas,<br />

México. Tesis de MC. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (Mex), 75 p.<br />

Ruiz De Oña P.C., L. Soto-Pinto, S. Paladino, F. Morales, E. Esquivel. (2011). Constructing<br />

public policy in a participatory manner: from local carbon sequestration projects to<br />

network governance in Chiapas, Mexico. In: B. M. Kumar and P. K. R. Nair (Eds).<br />

Pp. 247-262. Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry: Processes, Policy, and<br />

Prospects. Springer. Dordrecht.<br />

Schejtman, A. and J. A. Berdegué. (2004). Desarrollo territorial rural. Serie Debates y Temas<br />

rurales 1. Rimisp-Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural. Santiago, Chile.<br />

Soto-Pinto L., Perfecto I., Castillo-Santiago H.J. and Caballero N.J. (2000). Shade effect on<br />

coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agricult.<br />

Ecosyst. Environ. 80: 61–69.<br />

Soto-Pinto L., Anzueto-Martinez M., Mendoza V. J., Jimenez-Ferrer G., B. de Jong B. 2010.<br />

Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas,<br />

Mexico. Agroforestry Systems 78 (1):39-51.<br />

Soto Pinto M.L., G. Montoya Gómez, J. F. Hernádez, T. Morales C, A. Flores, G. Jiménez<br />

Ferrer, E. Pineda D.B. (2011). Elaboración de la primera fase del sistema de<br />

evaluación de prácticas agroforestales en la Selva Lacandona. Technical Report of<br />

Consultancy to Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano 116 p.<br />

Soto-Pinto L., S. Roncal, M. Anzueto. Improved fallows as alternative to shifting cultivation<br />

in Chiapas México. Submitted.<br />

Swiderska K., D. Row, L. Siegele, M. Grieg-Gran. (2008). The governance of nature and the<br />

nature of governance: policy that works for biodiversity and livelihoods. IIED.<br />

London, UK, 184p.<br />

Sweeney B.W., T. Bott, J. K. Jackson, L.A. Kaplan, J. D. Newbold, L.J. Standley, W. C.<br />

Hession and R.J. Horwitz. (2004). Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and<br />

loss of stream ecosystem services. PNAS 101 ( 39) : 14132–14137.<br />

Toledo-Aceves, T., J. A. Meave, M. González-Espinosa, N. Ramírez-Marcial. (2011). Tropical<br />

montane cloud forests: Current threats and opportunities for their conservation<br />

and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Management, 92<br />

(3): 974-981.<br />

Watson R.T, I. R. Noble, B. Bolin, N. Ravindranath H., D. J. Verardo, D.J. Dokken. (2000).<br />

Land use, lande-use change and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental<br />

Panel on Climate Change. World Bank, Washington D.C. 388p.


1. Introduction<br />

17<br />

Economic Models<br />

of Shifting Cultivation: A Review<br />

Yoshito Takasaki<br />

University of Tsukuba<br />

Japan<br />

Shifting cultivation is a dominant agricultural system in tropical forests. Shifting<br />

cultivators transform nutrients stored in standing forests to soils by slashing, felling, and<br />

burning forests (i.e., slash-and-burn); they regularly shift crop lands by replacing depleted<br />

plots with cleared forest lands (Denevan & Padoch, 1987; Kleinman et al., 1995;<br />

Ruthenberg, 1980). Approximately 300–500 million people practice slash-and-burn<br />

agriculture on almost one third of the planet’s 1,500 million ha of arable land (Giaradina<br />

et al., 2000; Goldammer, 1993). Shifting cultivation is central to the poverty-environment<br />

nexus in the tropics. On one hand, shifting cultivation is a dominant livelihood activity<br />

among small-scale tropical farmers with various cultural, ethnic, and social backgrounds,<br />

and thus it is tightly linked with poverty and development (Angelsen & Wunder, 2003;<br />

Byron & Arnold, 1999; Reardon & Vosti, 1995; Sunderlin et al., 2005; Wunder, 2001). On<br />

the other hand, not only is shifting cultivation one of the major causes of tropical<br />

deforestation, but also, the associated forest-cover change leads to multiple environmental<br />

problems, such as soil degradation, biodiversity loss, and reduced carbon sequestration<br />

(e.g., Chazdon et al., 2009; Dent & Wright, 2009; Kleinman et al., 1995; Lawrence et al.,<br />

2005; Myers, 1992). As such, shifting cultivation can conflict with various conservation<br />

efforts, such as maintaining protected areas, engaging in community-based conservation,<br />

sustaining integrated conservation-development programs (ICDPs), making payments for<br />

environmental services (PES), and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest<br />

degradation (REDD) (e.g., Angelsen, 2008; Wilshusen et al., 2002; Wunder, 2006). A winwin<br />

goal of poverty alleviation and rainforest conservation in shifting cultivation systems<br />

is a global challenge of the first order. To design an effective policy mix, it is crucial to<br />

develop a better understanding of shifting cultivators’ decision making; to that end,<br />

economic modeling is a powerful tool.<br />

This chapter reviews economic models of shifting cultivation and those of deforestation<br />

and soil conservation related to shifting cultivation developed by economists over the last<br />

two decades. My goal is not to offer a comprehensive review, but to highlight key<br />

modeling approaches (what is modeled and what is not, and with what assumptions),<br />

clarify how they are useful and incomplete in efforts to examine shifting cultivators’<br />

behaviors, and point to promising directions for future modeling. I encourage readers to


352<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

see other reviews on economic models, such as Kaimowitz and Angelsen (1998) and<br />

Barbier and Burgess (2001) for deforestation and Barbier (1997) for land degradation in<br />

developing countries. As far as I know, no other reviews on economic models of shifting<br />

cultivation are available.<br />

I focus on farm-level models that characterize individual farmers’ behaviors (endogenous<br />

variables) under certain environmental and institutional conditions, such as resource<br />

stock, markets, and property rights (Binswanger & McIntire, 1987). 1 Farm models allow<br />

modelers to examine how farmers’ behaviors are affected by policy parameters<br />

(exogenous variables). Modelers usually focus on individual farmers’ key decisions that<br />

directly or indirectly determine environmental outcomes of interest (e.g., forest clearing in<br />

deforestation models). Although no models fully capture the complexity of the real world,<br />

economic models highlight key aspects of the reality to better understand causal<br />

mechanisms.<br />

1.1 Modeling approach<br />

Three important choices in modeling approaches require attention: static vs. dynamic<br />

modeling, market conditions, and policies. Economic models are generally classified into<br />

static or dynamic models; whereas static models capture economic agents’ decisions at a<br />

point in time, dynamic models consider the potentially changing path of their behaviors.<br />

The choice depends on whether agents’ decisions at a point in time affect their future<br />

decisions. This dynamic linkage is described by state equations, i.e., the law of motion of<br />

state variables, which can be the outcome of interest. Although static models characterize<br />

agents’ optimal decisions at a given point in time, dynamic models characterize the overtime<br />

path of their optimal decisions (control variables) and corresponding state variables.<br />

For example, in a soil-conservation model, the state variable can be soil stock (or fertility)<br />

and the control variables can be farmers’ choices that affect soil fertility, such as cultivation<br />

intensity and soil conservation input. The simplest dynamic model is a two-period model,<br />

although most dynamic models discussed below consider an infinite time horizon, while in<br />

this chapter, models are considered to be static when agents make current decisions based<br />

only on the present value of the net benefit/cost stream.<br />

Although perfect markets enable an efficient allocation of resources, market imperfection is<br />

the norm in developing countries, where most tropical forests are situated. Better<br />

understanding market imperfection and non-market institutions has been a central theme of<br />

development economics over the last three decades (Bardhan & Udry, 1999; Ray, 1998).<br />

Although many shifting cultivation, deforestation, and soil conservation models in the<br />

literature assume perfect markets to examine price policies, such as those related to taxes<br />

and subsidies, some models consider imperfect factor markets. In particular, although with<br />

a perfect labor market a market price (wage) supports a separation of farm households'<br />

consumption (labor supply) and production (labor demand) decisions, market imperfection<br />

can break this separation (Singh et al., 1986); here wage represents the opportunity cost of<br />

1 Kaimowitz and Angelsen (1998) review deforestation models other than farm-level models, such as<br />

regional-level models and national and macro-level models, including general equilibrium models (see<br />

also Angelsen & Kaimowitz, 1999). Although tropical forests are often common property, soils are<br />

individual farmers’ private property; most soil conservation models are farm-level models.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 353<br />

labor in the form of returns to any non-farm activities (Benjamin, 1992). Not surprisingly,<br />

market imperfection commonly gives rise to ambiguous policy impacts. In contrast, some<br />

models employ a framework that does not involve any factor markets (e.g., models focusing<br />

on fallow-cultivation cycle).<br />

Most models examine farm output price (mostly food price) and wage (opportunity cost<br />

of labor), which can be altered by various macroeconomic policies; some models also<br />

examine input price other than wage, technological progress, and property rights. 2 Many<br />

dynamic models highlight the role of the discount rate, which can be altered by credit<br />

policies. Some models that consider farmers’ decisions with uncertainty – especially in<br />

production and price – focus on the roles of risk and risk aversion. Most deforestation<br />

models show that promoting farming through price and technology leads to greater forest<br />

clearing as the farmers augment farm production; in contrast, promoting non-farm<br />

activities discourages forest clearing. Most dynamic models reveal that a lower discount<br />

rate encourages investment not only in soils (soil conservation), but also in land holdings<br />

(forest clearing). Other policy impacts are generally mixed, depending on modeling<br />

specification (assumption). Specific theoretical predictions of each model are not reviewed<br />

in this chapter.<br />

1.2 Organization of the chapter<br />

The remainder of the chapter is organized as follows. Sections 2, 3, and 4 review deforestation,<br />

soil conservation, and shifting cultivation models, respectively. The main papers cited in these<br />

sections are listed in chronological order in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively, which summarize<br />

decision variables, outcome variables, policy parameters, modeling frameworks (static vs.<br />

dynamic), and factor markets (perfect vs. imperfect vs. not modeled).<br />

The tables also report whether the modeling work is accompanied with a substantial<br />

empirical analysis; an empirical analysis can be a case study, a descriptive analysis of micro<br />

data, simulation work based on micro data, or a regression analysis (to test theoretical<br />

hypotheses). Whereas some models – especially those accompanied with an empirical<br />

analysis – consider specific empirical contexts (e.g., colonists in Amazonia), others are<br />

developed in general contexts. Although this distinction is not always clear, it is clarified<br />

when needed. In some models I show mathematical equations to highlight their key features<br />

in a concrete way; when I do so, I change original notations (and functions in some cases) to<br />

uniform notations for clarity and clear comparisons across models.<br />

Based on these reviews, Section 5 discusses major lacunae in extant shifting cultivation<br />

models and promising avenues for future modeling. Section 6 concludes.<br />

2. Deforestation models<br />

Most farm-level deforestation models examine forest-clearing labor as a key decision<br />

variable. Assuming a simple function of forest clearing with labor as a unique input (which<br />

is valid among small-scale farmers who do not use chainsaws), cleared forest is directly<br />

captured by forest-clearing labor.<br />

2Welfare-augmenting policies are usually considered. It is a straightforward process to examine welfare<br />

impacts of specific policies in dynamic models by applying the procedure developed by Caputo (1990)<br />

(see Takasaki, 2006 for an example).


354<br />

Southgate<br />

(1990)<br />

Larson<br />

(1991)<br />

DeShazo<br />

and<br />

DeShazo<br />

(1995)<br />

Bluffstone<br />

(1995)<br />

Angelsen<br />

(1999)<br />

Barrett<br />

(1999)<br />

Barbier<br />

(2000)<br />

Pendleton<br />

and Howe<br />

(2002)<br />

van Soest<br />

et al.<br />

(2002)<br />

Takasaki<br />

(2007)<br />

Delacote<br />

(2007)<br />

Main decision<br />

variables<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor, soil<br />

conservation labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor, soil<br />

conservation labor<br />

Main outcome<br />

variables<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor, soil<br />

conservation<br />

labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor, soil<br />

conservation<br />

labor<br />

On-farm labor Forest clearing<br />

(land value)<br />

Labor for firewood<br />

collection<br />

Cleared forest<br />

(distance)<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Proportion of land<br />

cultivated<br />

Table 1. Deforestation models<br />

Firewood<br />

collection, forest<br />

stock<br />

Cleared forest<br />

(distance)<br />

Forest-clearing<br />

labor<br />

Main policy<br />

parameters<br />

Output price,<br />

wage, interest<br />

rate<br />

Output price,<br />

wage, interest<br />

rate,<br />

technological<br />

progress<br />

Output price,<br />

input price,<br />

wage, cost of<br />

land clearing<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Static vs.<br />

dynamic<br />

Factor<br />

markets<br />

Empirics<br />

Static Perfect None<br />

Static Perfect None<br />

Static Perfect None<br />

Wage Dynamic Perfect, Nepal<br />

imperfect (simulation)<br />

Output price,<br />

wage, transport<br />

cost, discount<br />

rate, population<br />

Output price -<br />

mean and<br />

standard<br />

deviation<br />

Cultivated land Output price,<br />

wage<br />

Cleared forest Market<br />

integration<br />

(generated from<br />

price and wage),<br />

technological<br />

progress<br />

Cleared forest Technological<br />

progress, output<br />

price<br />

Static None,<br />

perfect<br />

None<br />

Static Perfect Madagascar<br />

(case study)<br />

Dynamic Perfect Mexico,<br />

Ghana<br />

(case study)<br />

Dynamic<br />

(2 periods)<br />

Cleared forest Output price, Dynamic<br />

wage, land price, (2 periods)<br />

discount rate<br />

Proportion of<br />

land cultivated<br />

Risk, risk<br />

aversion,<br />

population,<br />

forest<br />

profitability<br />

Perfect Bolivia<br />

(regression)<br />

Static Perfect,<br />

imperfect<br />

None<br />

Perfect, None<br />

imperfect<br />

Static Not<br />

modeled<br />

None


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 355<br />

McConnell<br />

(1983)<br />

Main decision<br />

variables<br />

Soil loss, nonsoil<br />

input<br />

Main outcome<br />

variables<br />

Main policy<br />

parameters<br />

Static vs.<br />

dynamic<br />

Factor<br />

markets<br />

Empirics<br />

Soil depth Tenure Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Barbier (1990) Soil-degrading Soil depth Output price,<br />

input, soilconserving<br />

input<br />

input price<br />

Barrett (1991) Soil loss, nonsoil<br />

input<br />

Clarke (1992) Farm input, soil<br />

investment<br />

LaFrance<br />

(1992)<br />

Krautkraemer<br />

(1994)<br />

Cultivation<br />

input, soilconservation<br />

input<br />

Barrett (1996) Soil loss, soilconservation<br />

input<br />

Grepperud<br />

(1997a)<br />

Grepperud<br />

(1997b)<br />

Bulte and van<br />

Soest (1999)<br />

Grepperud<br />

(2000)<br />

Lichtenberg<br />

(2006)<br />

Graff-Zivin<br />

and Lipper<br />

(2008)<br />

Dynamic Perfect Indonesia<br />

(descriptive)<br />

Soil depth Output price Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil quality Output price,<br />

input price,<br />

discount rate<br />

Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil stock Output price Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil loss Soil fertility Population Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil depth Output price,<br />

discount rate<br />

Farming labor, Farming labor, Farming<br />

soil-conservation soil-conservation support, soil-<br />

labor<br />

labor<br />

conservation<br />

support, offfarm<br />

support<br />

Farm input, Soil stock Output price,<br />

investment in<br />

soil-conservation<br />

structure<br />

discount rate<br />

Soil loss,<br />

farming labor<br />

Farming<br />

intensity (soil<br />

depleting/<br />

conserving)<br />

Soil loss,<br />

farming labor<br />

Soil carbonsequestration<br />

investment<br />

Table 2. Soil-conservation models<br />

Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Static Perfect None<br />

Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil depth Output price Dynamic Perfect,<br />

imperfect<br />

None<br />

Soil fertility Risk aversion Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil depth Output price Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Soil carbonsequestration<br />

investment<br />

Sequestration<br />

cost, output<br />

price, discount<br />

rate, risk<br />

aversion<br />

Dynamic Perfect None


356<br />

Barrett<br />

(1991)<br />

Jones and<br />

O’Neill<br />

(1993)<br />

López<br />

(1997)<br />

Tachibana<br />

et al. (2001)<br />

Batabyal and<br />

Lee (2003)<br />

Sylwester<br />

(2004)<br />

Willassen<br />

(2004)<br />

Takasaki<br />

(2006)<br />

Pascual and<br />

Barbier<br />

(2006)<br />

Pascual and<br />

Barbier<br />

(2007)<br />

Balsdon<br />

(2007)<br />

Brown<br />

(2008)<br />

Main decision<br />

variables<br />

Cultivation<br />

length, fallow<br />

length<br />

Proportion of<br />

land<br />

cultivated<br />

Main outcome<br />

variables<br />

Fallowcultivation<br />

cycle<br />

Main policy<br />

parameters<br />

Fallow length Output price,<br />

wage, discount<br />

rate, population<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Static vs.<br />

dynamic<br />

Factor<br />

markets<br />

Output price Dynamic Not<br />

modeled<br />

Empirics<br />

None<br />

Static Perfect None<br />

Cleared forest Cleared forest Output price Dynamic Perfect Ghana<br />

(regression)<br />

Proportion of<br />

upland land<br />

cultivated,<br />

upland forest<br />

cleared<br />

Proportion of<br />

upland<br />

cultivated,<br />

shifting<br />

cultivation area,<br />

upland forest<br />

cleared<br />

Lowland<br />

technological<br />

progress,<br />

lowland farm<br />

area, output<br />

price, forestclearing<br />

cost,<br />

tenure security<br />

Fallow length Fallow length Return to fallow,<br />

discount rate<br />

Proportion of<br />

land<br />

cultivated<br />

Fallowcultivation<br />

cycle<br />

Proportion of<br />

land cleared<br />

Farming labor<br />

(clearing and<br />

on-farm labor<br />

with a fixed<br />

proportion)<br />

Farming labor<br />

(clearing and<br />

on-farm labor<br />

with a fixed<br />

proportion)<br />

Cultivation<br />

length<br />

Proportion of<br />

land<br />

cultivated<br />

Land quality Income transfer,<br />

output price,<br />

population<br />

Fallowcultivation<br />

cycle,<br />

soil fertility<br />

(present value of<br />

gross output)<br />

Proportion of<br />

land cleared<br />

Fallow soil<br />

fertility, forest<br />

clearing<br />

Fallow soil<br />

fertility, forest<br />

clearing<br />

Cultivation<br />

length<br />

Proportion of<br />

land cultivated<br />

Table 3. Shifting cultivation models<br />

Dynamic Perfect Vietnam<br />

(regression)<br />

Dynamic Not<br />

modeled<br />

Dynamic Not<br />

modeled<br />

Output price Dynamic Not<br />

modeled<br />

Output price,<br />

wage, discount<br />

rate, soilregeneration<br />

rate, soil<br />

erosivity<br />

None<br />

None<br />

None<br />

Dynamic Perfect None<br />

Population Dynamic Perfect Mexico<br />

(simulation)<br />

Output price Dynamic Perfect Mexico<br />

(simulation)<br />

Output price,<br />

non-farm income<br />

Preference,<br />

spatial<br />

dependency<br />

Dynamic Not<br />

modeled<br />

None<br />

Dynamic Perfect Cameroon<br />

(regression,<br />

simulation)


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 357<br />

2.1 Static deforestation models<br />

Early deforestation models are static. Southgate (1990), which is elaborated by Larson (1991),<br />

considers not only forest-clearing labor, but also soil-conservation labor among colonists in<br />

the forest frontier; 3 these two labors separately determine the present value of agricultural<br />

production (cropping and livestock) and soil conservation. DeShazo and DeShazo (1995)<br />

apply an agricultural household model (Singh et al., 1986) to forest clearing with a perfect<br />

labor market, though they capture forest clearing through the value of land (rent), not forest<br />

clearing itself. van Soest et al. (2002) directly extend the agricultural household model to<br />

forest clearing, comparing effects of farm technological progress on forest clearing under<br />

perfect and no labor-market conditions.<br />

Barrett (1999) and Delacote (2007), respectively, examine influences of price and production<br />

risk in farming on forest clearing in their static models; Delacote (2007) also addresses effects<br />

of risk aversion and returns to standing forest in the form of non-timber forest products<br />

(NTFPs). 4<br />

2.2 Discrete dynamic deforestation models<br />

Static deforestation models effectively treat cleared land as a variable input (produced by<br />

labor) for farming. This setup is valid if tropical farmers replace their old infertile plots with<br />

newly cleared forest lands every agricultural season or do not consider future production on<br />

their cleared lands because of insecure tenure. This is not a common practice among shifting<br />

cultivators, because (1) forest clearing is very costly to them (especially with no use of<br />

chainsaws), (2) they can employ a variety of traditional soil management techniques (in<br />

particular fallowing), and (3) forest clearing and cultivation often give them some claims to<br />

the land (Takasaki, 2007). Instead, shifting cultivators crop their cleared lands for more than<br />

one agricultural season over time.<br />

Takasaki (2007) treats forest clearing as both an input for current production and an<br />

investment in future production in his two-period model. Quality-adjusted land for<br />

cultivation at period t is given by:<br />

<br />

A aL<br />

(1.1)<br />

1 1<br />

1 <br />

A A a L<br />

(1.2)<br />

2 1 2<br />

where Lt is labor allocated to clear forest at period t, a is forest-clearing function, and ρ<br />

captures fertility decline through cultivation (depreciation rate). van Soest et al. (2002) use<br />

the same forest-clearing function as in equation (1.1); equation (1.2) is a state equation of<br />

3Although conflicts over property rights are central issues among colonists in the forest frontier (e.g.,<br />

Alston et al., 2000; Anderson & Hill, 1990; Hotte, 2001; Mueller, 1997), related theoretical modeling is<br />

not reviewed in this chapter.<br />

4The potential role of NTFPs for sustainable development and poverty alleviation in the tropics is often<br />

emphasized (e.g., Arnold & Perez, 2001; Coomes et al., 2004; Wunder, 2001); at the same time,<br />

overexploitation of forest resources as local commons among poor populations has been a major<br />

concern (i.e., poverty-environment trap) (Barbier, 2010; Dasgupta, 1993, 2001; Jodha, 1986). In particular,<br />

firewood collection and associated forest degradation have received much attention. Bluffstone (1995),<br />

for example, examines firewood/fodder collection and forest biomass evolution.


358<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

crop land. Takasaki (2007) considers not only labor-market conditions, but also land-market<br />

conditions, comparing four distinct market institutions (Latin America vs. Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa), including the effects of land price.<br />

Some static models, such as Southgate (1990), Larson (1991), and Angelsen (1999), jointly<br />

address input and investment aspects of forest clearing by considering the benefit/cost<br />

stream over time generated by current forest clearing; such models capture neither farmers’<br />

behaviors over time nor the evolution of land assets. 5<br />

Pendleton and Howe (2002) develop a two-period model for Amerindians in Bolivia,<br />

capturing forest clearing in the dry season (period 1) for production in the wet season<br />

(period 2). Distinct from other modeling works, Pendleton and Howe (2002) distinguish<br />

between primary and secondary forests; they also construct a measure of market integration<br />

from market prices.<br />

2.3 Continuous dynamic deforestation models<br />

Following a standard capital model, dynamic farm-level deforestation models consider<br />

forest clearing as a pure investment in land capital for future production. This modeling is<br />

commonly used to examine a society's optimal deforestation – i.e., exploitation of tropical<br />

forests as the commons – in the literature (e.g., Barbier & Burgess, 1997; Ehui et al., 1990;<br />

López, 1994; López & Niklitschek, 1991); most models employ control theory in a<br />

continuous time framework (e.g., Kamien & Schwartz, 1991; Seietstad & Sydsaeter, 1987).<br />

Assuming that a fixed proportion of arable land (δ) is fallowed in each time period, Barbier<br />

(2000) considers the following state equation:<br />

<br />

A a L A<br />

(2)<br />

where time index is suppressed and A dA dt . The depreciation rate δ is effectively the<br />

same as ρ in equation (1) in the discrete-time framework.<br />

3. Soil-conservation models<br />

Soil-management measures are classified into two groups based on their costs: one with<br />

reduced current output levels, such as less intensified cultivation, forest fallowing, and<br />

perennial systems, and the other with input use, which can take various forms, such as<br />

mulching, composting, terracing, and creating hedgerows, depending on agroecological<br />

conditions in specific locales. Although fertilizer is an essential input in other agricultural<br />

systems, fertilizer use is very limited in shifting cultivation that relies heavily on forestbased<br />

measures (forest clearing and fallowing) (Nicholaides et al., 1983; Sanchez et al., 1982).<br />

Grepperud (1997a) examines how programs supporting farming, soil conservation, and nonfarm<br />

activities affect labor allocations for these three activities in his static model, in the<br />

same spirit as Southgate (1990) and Larson (1991).<br />

5The key decision variable in Angelsen’s model (1999) is the distance to forest cleared. Such spatial<br />

modeling, which is common among geographers, is not reviewed in this chapter (other examples of<br />

spatial farm-level deforestation models developed by economists include Angelsen, 1994; Chomitz &<br />

Gray, 1996; Mendelsohn, 1994). Angelsen (1999) compares four models under distinct modeling<br />

assumptions and property rights, not market conditions, in a unified framework.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 359<br />

All soil conservation models developed in the literature examine continuous cultivation<br />

with fixed land size.<br />

3.1 Canonical soil dynamics<br />

McConnell (1983) models the dynamics of soil depth x as follows:<br />

x s<br />

(3)<br />

where is natural soil regeneration and s is soil loss associated with cultivation; farm<br />

output is a function of soil loss, soil depth (fertility), and non-soil inputs (evaluated at factor<br />

price). 6 This model captures only the adjustment of cultivation intensity among soilmanagement<br />

measures.<br />

3.2 Input-based soil-conservation models<br />

Economists have extended McConnell’s (1983) dynamic model by incorporating input-based<br />

soil-conservation measures in various ways. Clarke (1992) adds soil investment as a choice<br />

variable to equation (3); Barbier (1990) and LaFrance (1992) consider inputs for (soil<br />

degrading) cultivation and soil conservation separately; Barrett (1996) adds a soilconservation<br />

measure as a function of conservation input to equation (3); and Grepperud<br />

(1997b) considers an investment in soil-conservation structure, such as terraces, modeling<br />

the joint evolution of soil stock and conservation structure.<br />

Bulte and van Soest (1999) examine the soil dynamics with no labor market, using the<br />

following state equation:<br />

<br />

x l s<br />

(4)<br />

where l is labor for soil conservation. Equation (4) captures labor-intensive soil<br />

conservation. 7<br />

Grepperud (2000) examines how risk aversion influences soil conservation with production<br />

and price uncertainty. Graff-Zivin and Lipper (2008) examine the farmer’s decision on<br />

investment in soil carbon sequestration by explicitly modeling soil carbon as well as soil<br />

fertility with production risk; they examine effects of sequestration cost and risk aversion, as<br />

well as output price and discount rate.<br />

3.3 Continuous vs. cyclical farming<br />

Assuming stock-dependent soil regeneration (cf. equations 3 and 4),<br />

<br />

x x s<br />

(5)<br />

Krautkraemer (1994) shows that in the presence of nonconvexity in the net benefit function,<br />

a non-continuous farming strategy – periodic cycles of cultivation and fallow – can be an<br />

6Barrett (1991) compares McConnell’s (1983) models with and without non-soil inputs.<br />

7Using equation (4), Bulte and van Soest (2001) examine an environmental Kuznets curve for land<br />

degradation with no labor market. Lichtenberg (2006) demonstrates that ambiguous impacts of output<br />

price found by Bulte and van Soest (1999) is not attributable to labor-market failure, but can occur<br />

depending on the labor supply's wage elasticity.


360<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

equilibrium (Lewis & Schmalensee, 1977, 1979) and that population growth leads to a shift<br />

from cyclical cultivation to continuous cultivation (sensu Boserup, 1965).<br />

4. Shifting cultivation models<br />

Shifting cultivation models in the economics literature can be classified into four: the fallowcultivation<br />

cycle model, the forest-fallow model, the cultivation-intensity model, and the<br />

land-replacement model. 8 Almost all models are dynamic; all models except for Tachibana<br />

et al. (2001) assume a fixed land size.<br />

4.1 Fallow-cultivation cycle models<br />

Fallow-cultivation cycle models focus on fallow and/or cultivation length as decision<br />

variables, ignoring all other decisions, such as labor allocation. Barrett (1991) extends the<br />

optimal forest-rotation problem (Faustmann, 1995) to fallow-cultivation cycles by treating<br />

both fallow and cultivation lengths as choice variables. This rotation problem does not<br />

explicitly capture soil dynamics. In contrast, Willassen (2004) models the cyclical evolution<br />

of soil fertility in the cultivation and fallow phases; the farmer chooses only the phase –<br />

binary choice q = 0 (fallow) or 1 (cultivation) – over time, and distinct from soil conservation<br />

models (e.g., equation 3), soil dynamics under cultivation as well as fallow are assumed to<br />

be determined by soil fertility level x only.<br />

In these cyclical models, the farmer does no cultivation in the fallow phase. This<br />

simplification is for analytical tractability. Of course, in practice, shifting cultivators mix<br />

different stages of cultivation and fallow across plots.<br />

Assuming fixed fallow length and on-farm soil dynamics characterized by equation (5),<br />

Balsdon (2007) focuses on cultivation length as a choice variable; distinct from other cyclical<br />

models, the termination of the cultivation phase in one plot is instantly followed by<br />

cultivation on the next plot. Batabyal and Lee (2003), in contrast, focus on the choice of<br />

fallow length.<br />

4.2 Cultivation-intensity models<br />

Cultivation-intensity models capture soil degradation resulting from shortened fallow<br />

through the cultivation-intensity measure without explicitly modeling fallow dynamics.<br />

Although cultivation-intensity models differ depending on their focus, their common<br />

feature is to capture cultivation intensity through the proportion of land cultivated (b). For a<br />

given land size, 1 – b is the proportion of fallow land and 1/b represents fallow length. For<br />

example, for b = .1, fallow length is 10 (years).<br />

4.2.1 Early cultivation-intensity models<br />

Larson and Bromley (1990) develop a dynamic model with a fixed cultivation intensity.<br />

Jones and O’Neill (1993) develop a static model using cultivation intensity b as a key<br />

decision variable. 9<br />

8Batabyal and Beladi (2004) and Batabyal and Nijkamp (2009) apply stochastic modeling to shifting<br />

cultivation, which is not reviewed in this chapter.<br />

9Jones and O’Neill (1993) extend their model to a spatial model.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 361<br />

4.2.2 Cultivation-intensity models with soil dynamics<br />

In Sylwester’s (2004) model, the soil dynamics under cultivation follows equation (5), with<br />

soil loss s replaced with a function of cultivation intensity b; distinct from other cultivationintensity<br />

models, Sylwester does not model factor markets as in fallow-cultivation cycle<br />

models.<br />

Whereas Brown (2008) considers a binary choice between cultivation and fallow – on each<br />

plot over time – as in fallow-cultivation cycle models, he solves the dynamic problem by<br />

treating this binary variable q as continuous; that is, he effectively uses cultivation intensity<br />

b as a choice variable. His focus is to examine the roles of preference (measured by the<br />

revealed preference approach) and spatial dependency in farmers’ forest clearing using<br />

simulation (see also Brown, 2006).<br />

4.2.3 Cultivation-intensity models with land dynamics<br />

Tachibana et al. (2001) develop a cultivation-intensity model that endogenizes the evolution<br />

of upland holdings (T) among Vietnamese farmers who combine upland shifting cultivation<br />

and lowland paddy cultivation:<br />

T a( b) bT<br />

(6)<br />

where a is (upland) forest cleared and endogenized depreciation rate δ(b) (cf. equation 2)<br />

captures soil degradation through shortened fallow (higher b captures depriving<br />

intensification). Note that distinct from equation (2), T is total land holdings, consisting of<br />

cultivated land bT (=A) and fallow land (1-b)T (= T – A). Furthermore, fallow land is under<br />

the risk of being grabbed by neighbors. Tachibana et al. (2001) examine how the proportion<br />

of cultivated upland land (inverse of fallow length), shifting cultivation area, and upland<br />

forest clearing are affected by a rich set of policies, such as lowland technological progress,<br />

lowland farm area, forest clearing cost, and upland tenure security, as well as output price.<br />

4.3 Forest-fallow models<br />

4.3.1 Forest-fallow models with communal fallow forest<br />

Forest-fallow models endogenize the dynamics of biomass accumulation in fallow forest as<br />

a soil builder. Fallow forest is explicitly or implicitly assumed to be communally owned by<br />

villagers. López (1997) introduces the following dynamics of fallow biomass density η:<br />

i i a<br />

<br />

Q<br />

(7)<br />

where γ is the intrinsic growth of secondary vegetation, ai is cleared forest by household i,<br />

and Q is total land area under both cultivation and fallow – of the village. Equation (7)<br />

assumes that fallow biomass density is determined by the proportion of cleared forest land<br />

for cultivation, i.e., village-level cultivation intensity. 10<br />

Assuming equation (7) and a simple conversion of biomass to soil fertility on cleared fallow<br />

forest, Pascual and Barbier (2006; 2007) derive the dynamics of soil fertility on cleared forest<br />

(Pascual & Barbier, 2006, equation 5). They assume that in each period of time the farmer<br />

10In the forest-fallow model, adding NTFPs collected from secondary fallow forest as an additional<br />

benefit of fallowing is a straightforward extension.


362<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

cultivates only the cleared land; then, on-farm soil conservation is irrelevant. In Pascual and<br />

Barbier (2006; 2007), the only decision variable is farm labor, which is assumed to be<br />

allocated between forest clearing and cultivation with a fixed proportion. Pascual and<br />

Barbier (2006; 2007) examine impacts of population density (n/Q, where n is the number of<br />

households in the village) and output price on forest clearing and fallow soil fertility.<br />

4.3.2 Forest-fallow models with private fallow forest<br />

Shifting cultivators commonly have usufruct of not only the cultivated land they have<br />

cleared, but also their fallow land; customary tenure of fallow land tends to be insecure,<br />

however, and this tenure insecurity influences their forest clearing and fallowing decisions<br />

(Otsuka & Place, 2001; Place & Otsuka, 2001; Tachibana et al., 2001). It is straightforward to<br />

revise equation (7) to characterize such an alternative customary tenure setting; then, soil<br />

fertility of cleared fallow forest is effectively determined by fallow length or the inverse of<br />

cultivation intensity, 1/b. In this way, the fallow-forest model with private fallow forest<br />

directly corresponds to the cultivation-intensity model; a key difference is that the former<br />

focuses on fallow dynamics and the latter highlights other dynamics, such as on-farm soil or<br />

land holdings.<br />

4.4 Land-replacement models<br />

Fallow-cultivation cycle models assume a cyclical switch of the whole land between<br />

cultivation and fallow; fallow-forest models assume that the farmer cultivates cleared forest<br />

land only in each period of time. In practice, shifting cultivators replace some depleted plots<br />

with cleared forest land each time, while continuing to cultivate the remaining plots;<br />

replacing all plots simultaneously is a polar case.<br />

This aspect is explicitly captured in the land-replacement model (with fixed land size)<br />

introduced by Takasaki (2006). The key choice variable is the proportion of cultivated land,<br />

not total land, replaced with cleared forest land (c). This modeling approach highlights the<br />

tension between replaced (cleared) and non-replaced (remaining) plots – the former is more<br />

fertile but clearing is costly. It also directly captures new soils on cleared forest land added<br />

to soils on remaining plots. Specifically, the dynamics of on-farm soil stock is obtained by<br />

extending equation (3):<br />

1 <br />

x c c s<br />

(8)<br />

where φ is soil stock (per unit of land) of cleared forest (see Takasaki, 2006, Figure 1 for<br />

derivation). Note that for c = 0 (continuous cultivation), equation (8) is the same as (3); for c<br />

= 1 (complete replacement), equation (8) corresponds to forest-fallow models, though fallow<br />

dynamics is not modeled (φ is not endogenized). Takasaki (2006) examines effects on forest<br />

clearing (measured by c) of soil-regeneration rate and soil erosivity altered by soil<br />

conservation programs, as well as output price, wage, and discount rate.<br />

5. Discussion<br />

5.1 Primary vs. secondary forests<br />

The review in the last section indicates two significant lacunae in the extant shifting<br />

cultivation models. The first lacuna is that the extant models do not distinguish between


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 363<br />

primary and secondary forests. 11 This distinction is critically important for both<br />

environmental and economic reasons. First, in general, protecting primary forest with<br />

greater biodiversity needs to be given a higher priority than secondary forest protection.<br />

At the same time, as primary forest becomes scarce in the tropics, researchers and<br />

practitioners pay greater attention to secondary fallow forest (Coomes et al., 2000). In<br />

particular, short fallow results in less matured secondary forest with limited biomass<br />

accumulation and poor protection of erodible soils, as well as low biodiversity, weak<br />

carbon sequestration, and limited timber and NTFPs (Brown & Lugo, 1990; Chazdon et<br />

al., 2009; Dalle & de Bois, 2006; Dent & Wright, 2009; Lawrence et al., 2005). Shifting<br />

cultivation models need to jointly address cleared primary forest and fallow length of<br />

secondary forest as key environmental outcomes.<br />

Second, the choice between primary and secondary forest is determined by farmers’<br />

decisions under specific environmental and economic conditions: In particular, secondary<br />

forest is less fertile but easier to clear than primary forest (Scatena et al., 1996), and this<br />

comparison depends on fallow length (farmer’s decision) (Dvořàk, 1992) and the availability<br />

of primary forest (determined by population growth, etc.). This choice also has a direct<br />

implication for asset accumulation: Although clearing secondary forest does not alter total<br />

land holdings (only the plot phase changes from fallow to cultivation), clearing new<br />

primary forest augments land holdings. That is, although secondary forest brings fertile soil,<br />

primary forest brings both more fertile soil and new land itself. Shifting cultivation models<br />

need to capture these key differences.<br />

Pendleton and Howe (2002) address the choice between primary and secondary forests as a<br />

pure forest-clearing problem; they neither model the role of secondary fallow forest as a soil<br />

builder nor consider soil addition through primary forest clearing. No other deforestation<br />

models distinguish or specify the type of cleared forest; this is also true in dynamic<br />

deforestation models, which necessarily involve land accumulation (Barbier, 2000; Takasaki,<br />

2007). Not only all soil conservation models but also most shifting cultivation models<br />

assume fixed land holdings, and thus implicitly focus on secondary forest; Tachibana et al.<br />

(2001) do not distinguish or specify the type of cleared forest, either.<br />

This lacuna in the theoretical literature is in contrast to the considerable number of empirical<br />

studies on primary and secondary forests. Smith et al. (1999), for example, show that the<br />

relative importance of secondary forest to primary forest increases over time among<br />

Amazonian colonists; Coomes et al. (2000; 2011) also find this pattern over a longer time<br />

span among Amazonian peasants (in their study village in Peru, primary forest has virtually<br />

disappeared).<br />

5.2 On-farm soil conservation in shifting cultivation<br />

Supporting non-farm activities discourages farming, thereby releasing pressure on forests.<br />

This policy option becomes available and significant only after non-agricultural sectors<br />

sufficiently develop, often following massive deforestation and forest degradation. What<br />

policies can slow down this trend along the development path?<br />

11 Primary forest “has had little or no anthropogenic intervention” and secondary forest is “woody<br />

successional vegetation that regenerates after the original forest cover has been removed for agriculture<br />

or cattle ranching” (Smith et al., 1999, p.86).


364<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

The second lacuna not only in the extant theoretical works on shifting cultivation, but also in<br />

related empirical works is the investigation into potential roles of on-farm soil conservation.<br />

Among poor shifting cultivators, forest-based soil-management options (forest clearing and<br />

fallowing) outweighs on-farm soil conservation (Barbier, 1997); when degraded land can be<br />

easily replaced, farmers have little incentive to adopt expensive input-based soilconservation<br />

measures. Then, the question is whether policy makers can alter shifting<br />

cultivators’ benefit-cost calculations by introducing effective soil-conservation programs, as<br />

discussed by Takasaki (2006) (see also Grepperud, 1997a).<br />

Although developing locally adoptable, effective soil-conservation measures in tropical<br />

forests has been a daunting task (Lal, 1995), soil scientists' recent growing interest in biochar<br />

in Amazonia may lead to significant improvement in soil fertility and soil carbon<br />

sequestration in shifting cultivation systems (Glaser, 2007; Marris, 2006; Steiner et al., 2004).<br />

Biochar, also known as black carbon, is the residue of organic matter that has been<br />

pyrolyzed (partially combusted in a low-oxygen environment). Research indicates that<br />

Amazonian black carbon (terra preta) has, on average, three times more soil organic matter<br />

(SOM) content, higher nutrient levels, and a better nutrient retention capacity than<br />

surrounding infertile soils (Glaser, 2007). How the labor-intensive alternative “slash-andchar”<br />

system, combined with sustainable charcoal production, can be promoted among poor<br />

shifting cultivators is still an open question, however (Swami et al., 2009) (see Coomes &<br />

Burt, 2001 for charcoal production among Amazonian peasants).<br />

Soil-conservation models extensively developed in the literature can well capture various<br />

input-based soil-conservation measures; in particular, equation (4) or its variant can be<br />

applied to labor-intensive conservation like biochar.<br />

5.3 Shifting cultivation regimes<br />

It is very useful to differentiate two regimes of shifting cultivation. In regime 1, where<br />

primary forest is available, farmers choose to clear primary or secondary forest. Although<br />

the extant deforestation and shifting cultivation models effectively capture primary forest<br />

clearing and secondary fallow forest clearing (cyclical cultivation), respectively, neither of<br />

them addresses the choice of these two. As primary forest becomes scarce (deforestation),<br />

cultivation shifts to regime 2, in which only secondary forest is cleared; in another words,<br />

primary forest has been so degraded that clearing primary forest is too costly or simply not<br />

an available option. Policies effectively protecting primary forest (in particular, protected<br />

areas with compliance) can also make this regime shift. 12 Although the extant shifting<br />

12 Migration can also significantly affect the regime shift. Coomes et al. (2011) find that urban migration<br />

plays an important role in lowering pressure on diminishing forest land among shifting cultivators in<br />

their study village. The extensive migration option in the forest frontier, however, may allow farmers to<br />

clear forest – both primary and secondary – without employing fallowing practices; this is possible<br />

among colonists in land-abundant areas in Latin America, especially in locales where selling cleared<br />

lands is an additional motive for forest clearing (Barbier, 2004; Binswanger, 1991; Takasaki, 2007).<br />

Conceptually, further regime shifts following regime 2 can be considered. Once shifting cultivators start<br />

to employ continuous cultivation on some plots, regime 3 emerges; in this new regime, in addition to<br />

forest fallow management, farmers make a key choice between shifting and continuous. Lastly, regime<br />

3 is followed by the complete shift to continuous cultivation, i.e., abandonment of shifting cultivation<br />

(Krautkraemer, 1994).


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 365<br />

cultivation models essentially focus on regime 2, protecting remaining primary forest and<br />

promoting sustainable secondary forest management (long fallow) in regime 1 should be<br />

given a higher priority for conservation and development in shifting cultivation systems.<br />

5.4 Future modeling<br />

It is now clear that a promising avenue for future modeling of shifting cultivation is to<br />

extend extant models for secondary fallow forest in regime 2 by adding primary forest<br />

clearing to capture regime 1 and by endogenizing on-farm soil conservation to examine its<br />

effects on forest outcomes. That is, a unified farm model of primary forest clearing, forest<br />

fallowing, and on-farm soil conservation is needed to examine effective policies for<br />

protecting primary forest and maintaining sustainable long fallow.<br />

Two extensions toward such a unified model are suggested. The first is to augment a<br />

cultivation-intensity model so that it captures the dynamics of both on-farm soil and land<br />

holdings (through primary forest clearing). Such an augmented model could explicitly<br />

capture the mechanism of depriving intensification embedded in δ(b) in equation (6).<br />

The second extension is to augment Takasaki’s (2006) land-replacement model by<br />

endogenizing cultivation intensity and capturing acquisition of new land and soil through<br />

primary forest clearing. The proportion of total land, not cultivated land, replaced with<br />

fallow forest is bc, and fallow length 1/bc determines the soil stock of cleared fallow forest φ<br />

in equation (8).<br />

5.5 Hypothetical effects of on-farm soil conservation<br />

How does better on-farm soil conservation affect forest outcomes? On one hand, in regime 2<br />

with no primary forest clearing, it is expected that shifting cultivators intensify on-farm soil<br />

conservation and rely less on fallow soils (less frequent clearing), resulting in longer fallow.<br />

On the other hand, in regime 1, better on-farm soil conservation encourages shifting<br />

cultivators to clear more primary forest with increased returns to farming; at the same time,<br />

primary forest clearing (land accumulation) is balanced with secondary forest clearing<br />

(fallow management). A well-designed soil conservation program might result in longer<br />

fallow at the cost of primary forest; then, it becomes crucial to combine the soil program<br />

with other measures to protect primary forest, such as protected areas.<br />

The unified farm model proposed above can dissect shifting cultivators’ benefit-cost<br />

calculations, shedding light on an effective policy mix for conservation and development<br />

and pointing to promising avenues for empirical research.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

This chapter reviewed farm-level economic models of shifting cultivation, as well as those of<br />

deforestation and soil conservation related to shifting cultivation. Although economists<br />

have made significant progress in modeling shifting cultivation over the last two decades,<br />

extant economic models neither clearly distinguish between primary and secondary forests<br />

nor address potential roles of on-farm soil conservation in shifting cultivation. Developing a<br />

unified farm model of primary forest clearing, forest fallowing, and on-farm soil<br />

conservation is needed to examine effective policies for protecting primary forest and<br />

maintaining sustainable secondary fallow forest. The chapter pointed to promising avenues<br />

for future modeling.


366<br />

7. Acknowledgment<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

This chapter has benefited significantly from the comments and suggestions of Oliver<br />

Coomes. This research has been made possible through financial support provided by the<br />

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,<br />

Science and Technology in Japan. Any errors of interpretation are solely the author’s<br />

responsibility.<br />

8. References<br />

Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D. & Mueller, B. (2000). Land reform policies, the sources of violent<br />

conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of<br />

<strong>Environment</strong>al Economics and Management, Vol. 39, No., 162-188.<br />

Anderson, T. L. & Hill, P. J. (1990). The race for property rights. Journal of Law and Economics,<br />

Vol. 33, No. 1, 177-197.<br />

Angelsen, A. (1994). Shifting cultivation expansion and intensity of production: the open<br />

economy case. Working Paper 3, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen.<br />

Angelsen, A. (1999). Agricultural expansion and deforestation: modeling the impact of<br />

population, market forces and property rights. Journal of Development Economics,<br />

Vol. 58, No. 1, 185-218.<br />

Angelsen, A. (Ed.), (2008). Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications, Center<br />

for International Forestry Research, Bogor.<br />

Angelsen, A. & Kaimowitz, D. (1999). Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from<br />

economic models. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 14, No. 1, 73-98.<br />

Angelsen, A. & Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues<br />

and research implications. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 40, Center for International<br />

Forestry Research, Bogor.<br />

Arnold, J. E. M. & Perez, M. R. (2001). Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest<br />

conservation and development objectives? Ecological Economics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 437-<br />

447.<br />

Balsdon, E. M. (2007). Poverty and the Management of Natural Resources: A Model of<br />

Shifting Cultivation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 333-<br />

347.<br />

Barbier, E. B. (1990). The farm-level economics of soil conservation: the uplands of Java. Land<br />

Economics, Vol. 66, No. 2, 198-211.<br />

Barbier, E. B. (1997). The economic determinants of land degradation in developing<br />

countries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Vol. 352,<br />

No. 1356, 891-899.<br />

Barbier, E. B. (2000). Links between economic liberalization and rural resource degradation<br />

in the developing regions. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 299-310.<br />

Barbier, E. B. (2004). Agricultural expansion, resource boom and growth in Latin America:<br />

implications for long-run economic development. World Development, Vol. 32, No.<br />

1, 137-157.<br />

Barbier, E. B. (2010). Poverty, Development, and <strong>Environment</strong>. <strong>Environment</strong> and Development<br />

Economics, Vol. 15, No. 6, 635-660.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 367<br />

Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. (1997). The economics of tropical forest land use options. Land<br />

Economics, Vol. 73, No. 2, 174-195.<br />

Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. (2001). The economics of tropical deforestation. Journal of<br />

Economic Surveys, Vol. 15, No. 3, 413-433.<br />

Bardhan, P. & Udry, C. (1999). Development Microeconomics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.<br />

Barrett, C. B. (1999). Stochastic food prices and slash-and-burn agriculture. <strong>Environment</strong> and<br />

Development Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 161-176.<br />

Barrett, S. (1991). Optimal soil conservation and the reform of agricultural pricing policies.<br />

Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 167-187.<br />

Barrett, S. (1996). Microeconomic responses to macroeconomic reforms in the optimal<br />

control of soil erosion. In: The <strong>Environment</strong> and Emerging Development Issues, P.<br />

Dasgupta & K. G. Mäler, (Eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br />

Batabyal, A. A. & Beladi, H. (2004). Swidden agriculture in developing countries. Review of<br />

Development Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 255-265.<br />

Batabyal, A. A. & Lee, D. M. (2003). Aspects of land use in slash and burn agriculture.<br />

Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 10, No. 13, 821-824.<br />

Batabyal, A. A. & Nijkamp, P. (2009). The Fallow and the Non-fallow States in Swidden<br />

Agriculture: A Stochastic Analysis. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Vol. 2,<br />

No. 1, 45-51.<br />

Benjamin, D. (1992). Household composition, labor markets and labor demand: testing for<br />

separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica, Vol. 60, No. 2, 287-322.<br />

Binswanger, H. P. (1991). Brazilian policies that encourage deforestation in the Amazon.<br />

World Development, Vol. 19, No. 7, 821-829.<br />

Binswanger, H. P. & McIntire, J. (1987). Behavioral and material determinants of production<br />

relations in land-abundant tropical agriculture. Economic Development and Cultural<br />

Change, Vol. 36, No. 1, 73-99.<br />

Bluffstone, R. (1995). The effect of labor market performance on deforestation in developing<br />

countries under open access: an example from rural Nepal. Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Economics and Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 42-63.<br />

Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change<br />

under Population Pressure, Aldine, New York.<br />

Brown, D. R. (2006). Personal preferences and intensification of land use: their impact on<br />

southern Cameroonian slash-and-burn agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems,<br />

Vol. 68, No., 53-67.<br />

Brown, D. R. (2008). A spatiotemporal model of shifting cultivation and forest cover<br />

dynamics. <strong>Environment</strong> and Development Economics, Vol. 13, No. 5, 643-671.<br />

Brown, S. & Lugo, A. E. (1990). Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology, Vol. 6,<br />

No. 1, 1-32.<br />

Bulte, E. H. & van Soest, D. P. (1999). A note on soil depth, failing markets and agricultural<br />

pricing. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1, 245-254.<br />

Bulte, E. H. & van Soest, D. P. (2001). <strong>Environment</strong>al degradation in developing countries:<br />

households and the (reverse) <strong>Environment</strong>al Kuznets Curve. Journal of Development<br />

Economics, Vol. 65, No. 1, 225-235.<br />

Byron, N. & Arnold, M. (1999). What future for the people of the tropical forests? World<br />

Development, Vol. 27, No. 5, 789-805.


368<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Caputo, M. R. (1990). How to do comparative dynamics on the back of an envelope in<br />

optimal control theory. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 14, No. 3-4,<br />

655-683.<br />

Chazdon, R. L., Peres, C. A., Dent, D., Sheil, D., Lugo, A. E., Lamb, D., Stork, N. E. & Miller,<br />

S. E. (2009). The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests.<br />

Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1406-1417.<br />

Chomitz, K. M. & Gray, D. A. (1996). Roads, Land Use, and Deforestation: A Spatial Model<br />

Applied to Belize. World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 487-512.<br />

Clarke, H. R. (1992). The supply of non-degraded agricultural land. Australian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 31-56.<br />

Coomes, O. T., Barham, B. L. & Takasaki, Y. (2004). Targeting conservation-development<br />

initiatives in tropical forests: insights from analyses of rain forest use and economic<br />

reliance among Amazonian peasants. Ecological Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1-2, 47-64.<br />

Coomes, O. T. & Burt, G. J. (2001). Peasant charcoal production in the Peruvian Amazon:<br />

rainforest use and economic reliance. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 140, No.<br />

1, 39-50.<br />

Coomes, O. T., Grimard, F. & Burt, G. J. (2000). Tropical forests and shifting cultivation:<br />

secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian<br />

Amazon. Ecological Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 109-124.<br />

Coomes, O. T., Takasaki, Y. & Rhemtulla, J. (2011). Land-use poverty traps identified in<br />

shifting cultivation systems shape long-term tropical forest cover. Proceedings of the<br />

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 108, No. 34, 13925-<br />

13930.<br />

Dalle, S. P. & de Bois, S. (2006). Shorter fallow cycles affect the availability of noncrop plant<br />

resources in a shifting cultivation system. Ecology and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2.<br />

Dasgupta, P. (1993). An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br />

Dasgupta, P. (2001). Human Well-being and the Natural <strong>Environment</strong>, Oxford University Press,<br />

Oxford.<br />

Delacote, P. (2007). Agricultural expansion, forest products as safety nets, and deforestation.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> and Development Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2, 235-249.<br />

Denevan, W. M. & Padoch, C. (Eds.), (1987). Swidden-Fallow Agroforestry in the Peruvian<br />

Amazon, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.<br />

Dent, D. H. & Wright, S. J. (2009). The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a<br />

quantitative review. Biological Conservation, Vol. 142, No. 12, 2833-2843.<br />

DeShazo, R. P. & DeShazo, J. R. (1995). An economic model of smallholder deforestation: a<br />

consideration of the shadow value of land on the frontier. In: Management of tropical<br />

forests: towards an integrated perspective, O. Sandbukt, (Ed.), Center for Development<br />

and the <strong>Environment</strong>, University of Oslo, Oslo.<br />

Dvořàk, K. A. (1992). Resource management by West African farmers and the economics of<br />

shifting cultivation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 74, No. 3, 809-<br />

815.<br />

Ehui, S., Hertel, T. W. & Preckel, P. V. (1990). Forest resource depletion, soil dynamics, and<br />

agricultural productivity in the tropics. Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Economics and<br />

Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 136-154.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 369<br />

Faustmann, M. (1995). Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands<br />

possess for forestry. Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 7-44.<br />

Giaradina, P. M., Sanford, R. L., Dockersmith, I. C. & Jaramillo, V. J. (2000). The effects of<br />

slash burning on ecosystem nutrients during the land preparation phase of shifting<br />

cultivation. Plant Soil, Vol. 220, No. 1/2, 247-260.<br />

Glaser, B. (2007). Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable<br />

agriculture in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society<br />

B, Vol. 362, No., 187-196.<br />

Goldammer, J. G. (1993). Historical biogeography of fire: tropical and subtropical. In: Fire in<br />

the environment: the ecological, atmospheric, and climatic importance of vegetation fires, P.<br />

J. Crutzen & J. G. Goldammer, (Eds.), Wiley, New York.<br />

Graff-Zivin, J. & Lipper, L. (2008). Poverty, Risk, and the Supply of Soil Carbon<br />

Sequestration. <strong>Environment</strong> and Development Economics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 353-373.<br />

Grepperud, S. (1997a). Soil conservation and government policies in tropical areas: does aid<br />

worsen the incentives for arresting erosion? Agricultural Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2,<br />

129-140.<br />

Grepperud, S. (1997b). Soil conservation as an investment in land. Journal of Development<br />

Economics, Vol. 54, No. 2, 455-467.<br />

Grepperud, S. (2000). Optimal Soil Depletion with Output and Price Uncertainty.<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> and Development Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 221-240.<br />

Hotte, L. (2001). Conflicts over property rights and natural-resource exploitation at the<br />

frontier. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 66, No. 1, 1-21.<br />

Jodha, N. S. (1986). Common property resources and rural poor in dry region of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 21, No. 27, 1169-1181.<br />

Jones, D. W. & O'Neill, R. V. (1993). Human-environmental influences and interactions in<br />

shifting agriculture when farmers form expectations rationally. <strong>Environment</strong> and<br />

Planning A, Vol. 25, No. 1, 121-136.<br />

Kaimowitz, D. & Angelsen, A. (1998). Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review,<br />

Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.<br />

Kamien, M. I. & Schwartz, N. L. (1991). Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and<br />

Optimal Control in Economics and Management, Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />

Kleinman, P. J. A., Pimentel, D. & Bryant, R. B. (1995). The ecological sustainability of slashand-burn<br />

agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and <strong>Environment</strong>, Vol. 52, No. 2-3, 235-<br />

249.<br />

Krautkraemer, J. A. (1994). Population growth, soil fertility, and agricultural intensification.<br />

Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2, 403-428.<br />

LaFrance, J. T. (1992). Do increased commodity prices lead to more or less soil degradation?<br />

Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 57-82.<br />

Lal, R. (1995). Sustainable management of soil resources in the humid tropics, United Nations<br />

University Press, Tokyo.<br />

Larson, B. A. (1991). The causes of land degradation along "spontaneously" expanding<br />

agricultural frontier in the third world: comment. Land Economics, Vol. 67, No. 2,<br />

260-266.<br />

Larson, B. A. & Bromley, D. W. (1990). Property rights, externalities, and resource<br />

degradation. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 235-262.


370<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Lawrence, D., Suma, V. & Mogea, J. P. (2005). Changes in species composition with repeated<br />

shifting cultivation: limited role of soil nutrients. Ecological Applications, Vol. 15, No.<br />

6, 1953-1967.<br />

Lewis, T. R. & Schmalensee, R. (1977). Nonconvexity and optimal exhaustion of renewable<br />

resources. International Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 535-552.<br />

Lewis, T. R. & Schmalensee, R. (1979). Nonconvexity and optimal harvesting strategies for<br />

renewable resources. Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 677-691.<br />

Lichtenberg, E. (2006). "A note on soil depth, failing markets and agricultural pricing":<br />

Comments. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 81, No. 1, 236-243.<br />

López, R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth<br />

and trade liberalization. Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Economics and Management, Vol. 27,<br />

No. 2, 163-184.<br />

López, R. (1997). <strong>Environment</strong>al externalities in traditional agriculture and the impact of<br />

trade liberalization: the case of Ghana. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 53, No.<br />

1, 17-39.<br />

López, R. & Niklitschek, M. (1991). Dual economic growth in poor tropical areas. Journal of<br />

Development Economics, Vol. 36, No. 2, 189-211.<br />

Marris, E. (2006). Putting the carbon back: black is the new green. Nature, Vol. 442, No., 624-<br />

626.<br />

McConnell, K. E. (1983). An economic model of soil conservation. American Journal of<br />

Agricultural Economics, Vol. 65, No. 1, 83-89.<br />

Mendelsohn, R. (1994). Property rights and tropical deforestation. Oxford Economic Papers,<br />

Vol. 46, No. Oct., 750-756.<br />

Mueller, B. (1997). Property rights and the evolution of a frontier. Land Economics, Vol. 73,<br />

No. 1, 42-57.<br />

Myers, N. (1992). The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future, W. W. Norton, New York.<br />

Nicholaides, J. J. I., Sanchez, P. A., Bandy, D. E., Villachica, J. H., Coutu, A. J. & Valverde, C.<br />

S. (1983). Crop production systems in the Amazon basin. In: The Dilemma of<br />

Amazonian Development, E. F. Moran, (Ed.), Westview Press, Boulder.<br />

Otsuka, K. & Place, F. (Eds.), (2001). Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management, The Johns<br />

Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.<br />

Pascual, U. & Barbier, E. B. (2006). Deprived land use intensification in forest-fallow<br />

agricultural systems under population pressure. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 34, No.<br />

2, 155-165.<br />

Pascual, U. & Barbier, E. B. (2007). On Price Liberalization, Poverty, and Shifting<br />

Cultivation: An Example from Mexico. Land Economics, Vol. 83, No. 2, 192-216.<br />

Pendleton, L. H. & Howe, E. L. (2002). Market integration, development, and smallholder<br />

forest clearance. Land Economics, Vol. 78, No. 1, 1-19.<br />

Place, F. & Otsuka, K. (2001). Population, tenure, and natural resource management: the case<br />

of customary land area in Malawi. Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Economics and<br />

Management, Vol. 41, No. 1, 13-32.<br />

Ray, D. (1998). Development Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.<br />

Reardon, T. & Vosti, S. A. (1995). Links between rural poverty and the environment in<br />

developing countries: asset categories and investment poverty. World Development,<br />

Vol. 23, No. 9, 1495-1506.


Economic Models of Shifting Cultivation: A Review 371<br />

Ruthenberg, H. (1980). Farming Systems in the Tropics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.<br />

Sanchez, P. A., Bandy, D. E., Villachica, J. H. & Nicholaides, J. J. (1982). Amazon basin soils:<br />

management for continuous crop production. Science, Vol. 216, No. 4548, 821-827.<br />

Scatena, F. N., Walker, R. T., Homma, A. K. O., de Conto, A., Ferreira, C. A. P., Carvalho, R.<br />

d. A., de Rocha, A. C. P. N., dos Santos, A. I. M. & de Oliverira, P. M. (1996).<br />

Cropping and fallowing sequences of small farmers in the "terra firme" landscape<br />

of the Brazilian Amazon: a case study from Santarem, Para. Ecological Economics,<br />

Vol. 18, No. 1, 29-40.<br />

Seietstad, A. & Sydsaeter, K. (1987). Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications,<br />

Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />

Singh, I., Squire, L. & Strauss, J. (Eds.), (1986). Agricultural Household Models: Extensions,<br />

Applications, and Policy, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.<br />

Smith, J., van de Kop, P., Reategui, K., Lombardi, I., Sabogal, C. & Diaz, A. (1999). Dynamics of<br />

secondary forests in slash-and-burn farming: interactions among land use types in<br />

the Peruvian Amazon. Agriculture Ecosystems & <strong>Environment</strong>, Vol. 76, No. 2-3, 85-98.<br />

Southgate, D. (1990). The causes of land degradation along "spontaneously" expanding<br />

agricultural frontiers in the third world. Land Economics, Vol. 66, No. 1, 93-101.<br />

Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G. & Zech, W. (2004). Slash and char: an alternative to slash and<br />

burn practiced in the Amazon basin. In: Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, Properties,<br />

and Management, J. Lehman, D. C. Kern, B. Glaser & J. Woods, (Eds.), Kluwer<br />

Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.<br />

Sunderlin, W. D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgess, P., Nasi, R., Santos, L. & Wunder, S.<br />

(2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview.<br />

World Development, Vol. 33, No. 9, 1383-1402.<br />

Swami, S. N., Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G. & Lehmann, J. (2009). Charcoal making in the<br />

Brazilian Amazon: economic aspects of production and carbon conversion<br />

efficiencies of kilns. In: Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision, W. I. Woods,<br />

(Ed.), Springer, Heidelberg.<br />

Sylwester, K. (2004). Simple Model of Resource Degradation and Agricultural Productivity<br />

in a Subsistence Economy. Review of Development Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 128-40.<br />

Tachibana, T., Nguyen, T. M. & Otsuka, K. (2001). Agricultural intensification versus<br />

extensification: a case study of deforestation in the northern-hill region of Vietnam.<br />

Journal of <strong>Environment</strong>al Economics and Management, Vol. 41, No. 1, 44-69.<br />

Takasaki, Y. (2006). A model of shifting cultivation: can soil conservation reduce<br />

deforestation? Agricultural Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 193-201.<br />

Takasaki, Y. (2007). Dynamic household models of forest clearing under distinct land and<br />

labor market institutions: can agricultural policies reduce tropical deforestation?<br />

<strong>Environment</strong> and Development Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 423-443.<br />

van Soest, D. P., Bulte, E. H., Angelsen, A. & van Kooten, G. C. (2002). Technological change<br />

and tropical deforestation: a perspective at the household level. <strong>Environment</strong> and<br />

Development Economics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 269-280.<br />

Willassen, Y. (2004). On the economics of the optimal fallow-cultivation cycle. Journal of<br />

Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1541-1556.


372<br />

Deforestation Around the World<br />

Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L. & West, P. C. (2002). Reinventing the<br />

square wheel: critique of a resurgent "protection paradigm" in international<br />

biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 15, No. 1, 17-40.<br />

Wunder, S. (2001). Poverty alleviation and tropical forests - what scope for synergies? World<br />

Development, Vol. 29, No. 11, 1817-1833.<br />

Wunder, S. (2006). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical<br />

conservation. Conservation Biology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 48-58.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!